ๆญฃๅœจๅŠ ่ฝฝ่ง†้ข‘...

่ง†้ข‘ๅŠ ่ฝฝๅคฑ่ดฅ

Be honest: Did you learn more about classical music from school or from Saturday morning cartoons like this๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐ŸŽฌ ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‚๐š๐ซ๐ญ๐จ๐จ๐ง: ๐‹๐จ๐ง๐ -๐‡๐š๐ข๐ซ๐ž๐ ๐‡๐š๐ซ๐ž (๐‹๐จ๐จ๐ง๐ž๐ฒ ๐“๐ฎ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ, ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ—๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ—). ๐Ÿฅ• ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐Œ๐š๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐จ: ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฌ ๐๐ฎ๐ง๐ง๐ฒ (๐ข๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐จ๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐  โ€œ๐‹๐ž๐จ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฅ๐โ€). ๐ŸŽถ ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐•๐ข๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ: ๐Ž๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐š ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ž๐ซ ๐†๐ข๐จ๐ฏ๐š๐ง๐ง๐ข ๐‰๐จ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ.

63,991 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 5 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰ โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 ๆก่ฏ„่ฎบ

ๆš‚ๆ— ่ฏ„่ฎบ

ๅŽŸๅง‹ๅธ–ๅญ็š„่ฏ„่ฎบๅฐ†ๆ˜พ็คบๅœจ่ฟ™้‡Œ

็›ธๅ…ณ่ง†้ข‘

"My definition of failure became not about the outcome, but about not trying." A few years ago on a podcast with Tony Robbins, Sara Blakely told the story of her father's nightly routine. As his children returned from school, he would ask Sara & her brother one question: "So what did you guys fail at this week?" As Sara tells it, her father would be disappointed not if they failed, but if they didn't. For her, "it flipped the whole model on its head." Her father was changing her definition of failure. Instead of a negative, failure "became not about the outcome, but about not trying." Another thing her father did (which I love) is ask his children "what benefit or what positive" came from their failures. In Blakely's words, this "trained our brains also to find thatโ€“โ€“and then it became, of course, I want to try these things." In short, the focus shifted from the outcome to what she could learn through the process. My thoughts: When I was younger I would always hear people say "to enjoy the process" but to be honest, it never really resonated until later on in life. As you age you begin to realize that the outcome, while still important, often turns out to be different than what you expected it would be. Maturity is knowing this at the outset. Things will change, pieces will break, and the path will be far from straight. Appreciating the experiences, relationships, and errors along the way is where real growth occurs. Each of these shapes the person you become. The Stoic philosopher Seneca once said: "A gem cannot be polished without friction, nor a man perfected without trials." To avoid failure is to avoid progress. Change your definition of failure. Flip the model on its head. Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this, follow me: Blake Burge for more.

Blake Burge

312,223 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 2 ๅนดๅ‰

Many donโ€™t like me because Iโ€™m direct, straightforward, and brutally honest. Ironically, those who love PDJT, but dislike me, clearly have issues. Iโ€™m just like him. We also have the same Simple and Hebrew Gematria numbers. I got my raising from old school Grandparents and Parents. It was a common theme with PDJTโ€™s generation. My Dad is 4 years older than PDJT. Too many have forgotten SIMPLE PRINCIPLES. I donโ€™t say anything that I donโ€™t already know the answer to. I donโ€™t say anything that Iโ€™m not willing to answer for or defend my stance. One may not like my stance, but I wonโ€™t be wishy-washy or flip-flopping. Theyโ€™re still trying to show and teach people what Chameleons look like. Because IF you change your stance on something in your life, and itโ€™s on public or family / friend recordโ€ฆ Youโ€™ll need to address that and then be dang sure that you are VERY KEENLY CONSISTENT on your new stance. As we grow older, we are supposed to mature, and learn things, and we are subject to change stances due to various circumstances, factors, and reasons. But once one does, know why youโ€™re changing and always be consistent after it. The Swamp, NEVER did this, they say things for Votes depending on the atmosphere and environment of topic and peopleโ€™s stances. Youโ€™d much rather have someone consistent with a more rigid personality versus a soft spoken, non-consistent, changing with the vote sway, to stay in โ€œofficeโ€ to get a free paycheck at your expense. ๐Ÿ“Œ

Derek Johnson

18,705 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 2 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ โ€œTHIS SERB EXPOSED A HARD TRUTH ABOUT POLANDโ€ โ€“ Is He Actually Right? A young Serb living in Poland just said something that hit many people straight in the chest โ€“ and honestly, itโ€™s hard to argue with him. When asked about the differences between Poland and Serbia, he didnโ€™t talk about politics or money. He went straight to culture. ๐Ÿ‘‰ Music. Identity. Folklore. He said something powerful: โ€œWhen you listen to Polish music, you donโ€™t really hear โ€˜Polishnessโ€™. You canโ€™t tell who Poles are as a nation from their music. But when you hear Serbian music โ€“ you immediately know. Loud. Wild. Emotional. Balkan.โ€ And then he went even deeper. Poland has beautiful folklore โ€“ Highlander culture, Kashubian traditions, regional dances, songs, costumesโ€ฆ But who actually knows them today? He asked a simple question: โ€œDo you know even ONE traditional Polish dance or folk song?โ€ Silence. And that silence says everything. He pointed out that two generations ago, people still cared. They knew the dances, the songs, the traditions. Today? TikTok, pop culture, Western trendsโ€ฆ folklore became โ€œcringeโ€ instead of cool. Meanwhile in Serbia? โ€œMy friends know at least five traditional dances each.โ€ Thatโ€™s not nostalgia. Thatโ€™s living culture. And heโ€™s right. Serbs carry their identity loudly โ€“ through music, dance, weddings, festivals. Poles? We have the cultureโ€ฆ but we hide it. โธป But hereโ€™s the twist ๐Ÿ‘‡ When asked what he would bring from Poland to Serbia, his answer was honest: ๐Ÿงพ Order. Organization. Digital systems. โ€œIn Poland I can do everything on my phone. Taxes, documents, offices. In Serbia everything is messy and slow.โ€ So even he admits: Poland wins in structure and efficiency. Serbia wins in soul and identity. โธป So the real question isโ€ฆ โ“ Is he right? โ“ Have Poles forgotten their own culture? โ“ Why do Serbs protect their traditions more than we do? โ“ When did we decide folklore is โ€œembarrassingโ€ instead of powerful? Because if we donโ€™t protect it โ€“ someone else will erase it for us. โธป ๐Ÿ‘‡ COMMENT: Do you agree with him? Name ONE Polish folk dance or song you know. Prove him wrong โ€“ or admit heโ€™s right. ๐Ÿ‘ Like โ€ข ๐Ÿ” Share โ€ข ๐Ÿ“Œ Follow ๐Ÿ‘‰ Follow us also on Facebook: Slavic Networks Nirali VVeles SlavicFreeSpirit #Poland #Serbia #SlavicCulture #Folklore #Identity #Tradition #Slavs #StreetInterview #CultureWar

Slavic Networks

265,855 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 6 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

I taught my Primary 2 students magnetic fields, and how they help us determine magnetic north and bearings using a compass. At the later half of the class, the students did a small experiment that used a magnet and compass to test what we learned. This is what Nigeria can take away from this: 1. LANGUAGE: Using Chinese to explain magnetic fields was so easy for them to understand, and took less than 4 mins. They never have to worry about understanding the grammar or remembering new vocabulary if another language was used. Language skill is not for everyone, just like technical and creative skills. While you or your son can learn a new language fast, others might be more technically inclined. Nigeria should use native languages to teach primary school children right from the first day in school. With many native languages, autonomous regions with different official languages will be ideal, with an option for international classes which are more English focused. 2. CURRICULUM: Unless we are really oblivious, there is no way a Nigerian primary 6 student can compete with my primary 2 students. These are kids that first came to our school so tiny and sometimes crying, many of them donโ€™t even know how to write their names. A Nigerian taught them most of what they know today in less than 2 years, and because we have a curriculum that is modern, targets what the students really need to know, and its always modified to reflect their realities, they have acquired so much knowledge about how the world around them works like electricity, engines, space, aerodynamics, mechanics and environmental protection in a short time. What they are learning is directly linked to where their economy is headed, so by the time they are in university, they can easily understand advanced practical and theoretical knowledge and be useful to their economic development after graduation. Our curriculums in Nigeria are old and mostly useless to the growth of our economy, so letโ€™s do the needful. Donโ€™t wait for miracles to change them for you. We must demand this change. 3. GROUP WORK: Students are encouraged to work in groups, divide tasks and roles and they mentored to understand their strengths and challenges and resolve conflicts. They learn to work with others who are different from them, giving them a diverse perspective and mindset about working together. Nigeria cannot succeed without all of us uniting and learning to work with each other, irrespective of tribe, religion, region and family background. When we win as individuals, we will still be surrounded by helpless people, but when we win as a society, everyone develops. 4. TEACHERS: Here in China, we are always happy and encouraged to learn new things and ways to teach our students. We are free from worrying about food, shelter and pocket money. We are paid more than enough, so we have enough time and mental space to throughly research information and knowledge, and also design useful and interesting lessons for our students. Nigerian teachers should be paid a minimum of 800k to 1 million Naira per month. Primary school teachers lay down the crucial foundations for our economic growth, development and future. It is one of the most important professions in the country and the compensation and benefits MUST be more than senators and representatives. Liking, commenting and retweeting are nice because they help spread the message, however whatโ€™s more important is us uniting as Nigerians with our common interest to ensure that our needs are addressed.

Dan Bello

160,935 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 2 ๅนดๅ‰

[Trans] ๐Ÿฐ: Sawadee krub ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿป ๐ŸŽค: Letโ€™s talk about your new song? ๐Ÿฐ: I have already released a song called "YOURS" under #RISERMUSIC label. Please give it a listen.๐Ÿ˜Š ๐ŸŽค: You look so handsome in the music video. You were dancing in it too. ๐Ÿฐ: Have you seen it? Yes, I danced a little bit ๐Ÿ•บ ๐ŸŽค: How long has it been since you last released a song? ๐Ÿฐ: I think itโ€™s been more than a year. I worked on it before, but every time I finished, I ended up redoing it again and again. I really wanted the final result to be exactly the way I liked it, so I kept adjusting it until it finally became this song. ๐ŸŽถ ๐ŸŽค: What is the song about? ๐Ÿฐ: Itโ€™s about a hopelessly in-love guy whoโ€™s deeply in love with a woman and is willing to do anything for her.๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿ’š ๐ŸŽค: Was it inspired by your own experience? ๐Ÿฐ: No, it was from Pโ€™Kangsom ๐Ÿ˜„ I really like the vibe of the song.๐ŸŽถ ๐ŸŽค: Is it related to your life? ๐Ÿฐ: Not at all. I now concentrate only on sword fighting โš”๏ธ ๐Ÿ˜† ๐ŸŽค: How do you manage to look so handsome while singing? ๐Ÿฐ: I just wake up like this. I don't know if I look handsome or not. ๐Ÿ˜‚ ๐ŸŽค: Letโ€™s talk about the recent case. What do you think about people using your face for their own benefit using AI? ๐Ÿฐ: I don't think they should do that. Technology can be both good and bad. It's not right to use it in a way that can mislead others. I have already taken legal action against those who have done it. ๐ŸŽค: Are you angry about it? ๐Ÿฐ: Not really angry, but I'm uncomfortable with it. It's not right. ๐ŸŽค: Are there any victims yet? ๐Ÿฐ: Not that I know of. ๐ŸŽค: Have the people who did it contacted you? ๐Ÿฐ: No. We are still in the process of identifying them. ๐ŸŽค: Are you going to take legal action against them to the fullest extent of the law? ๐Ÿฐ: Yes, definitely. ๐ŸŽค: Do you have anything to say to the people who are doing this? ๐Ÿฐ: Stop it. It's not right to do this to anyone eventually you will be caught and face legal consequences. ๐Ÿฐ: Thank you krub. ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿป WIN X AMAZING THAILAND #AmazingThailand #AmazingThailandExclusiveNight #winmetawin Winmetawin

โ—กฬˆ โœฟใ€œ*:.๏ฝก. ๊•ค M a R y ๊•ค*๏ฝฅ.๏ฝก.*๏ฝฅ*โœฟ.

29,102 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 5 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Labour put a Labour peer in charge of the rape gang inquiry then admit it wonโ€™t be exhaustive. Thatโ€™s not an inquiry. Itโ€™s a stitch-up. If they were serious, theyโ€™d appoint a judge, expose every failure, deport the rapists, and ban visas to Pakistan until abusers are taken back. Victims, like Jade deserve justice, not more cover-ups.๐Ÿ‘‡ The case of Jade Nurse. Her story, published this week is a catalogue of failure: raped by hundreds of men from the age of 14. โ€œFreshiesโ€ from Pakistan who were flown in to rape them. A system of targeted gang rape that operated in the open, and likely still does. This wasnโ€™t just grooming. It was sexual exploitation tourism, happening under the nose of the British state. What visas were these men arriving on? Visitor visas? Spousal visas? Were they ever vetted? Were they ever removed? How many even left? We issue hundreds of Pakistani visitor visas every single day over 200,000 granted last year alone, more than double the number issued just two years earlier, with barely any meaningful checks on criminal history, local enforcement records, or links to rape gang networks, how many, like the men Jade described, are here to rape? If we had a single serious safeguarding department in Whitehall, these questions would already be answered. But theyโ€™re not because no one dares ask. How many more Jades are there? We now know that what happened in Rotherham, Rochdale wasnโ€™t an exception. It was a model. Networks of Pakistani men were allowed to operate openly for over a decade across towns and cities in England. They werenโ€™t just ignored. They were enabled by police, by social services, and by politicians who feared losing their seats or individuals who feared being called racist more than they feared being complicit in the rape of children. These werenโ€™t isolated incidents. They were nationwide, organised, targeted abuse. The victims were mainly white girls. The rapists knew it. They called them โ€œwhite bitchesโ€.โ€ They told the victims the police wouldnโ€™t act, and if they did they would say the victim is racist . And for years, they were right. If Labour or the Conservatives want to talk about protecting women and girls, they can start here: How many rapists are coming in from Pakistan? And how many have been deported? If Pakistan refuses to take back its sex offenders, the UK must introduce immediate visa bans. Thatโ€™s what real safeguarding looks like. You donโ€™t protect women by letting the risk grow. You stop it. You remove it. Or you lose the right to say you care. Protection means prevention. Right now, a convicted sex offender can fight deportation under โ€œArticle 8 right to family life.โ€ He has rights. His victims donโ€™t. And while Labour clings to the ECHR, British girls are targeted. Borders matter. Enforcement matters. And nothing in Labourโ€™s plan tackles either. Labour wants to teach boys to respect girls. But boys donโ€™t learn respect from worksheets. They learn it from what the state tolerates. And what the state has tolerated for decades is the mass rape and torture of British girls, while the state let the guilty go free and kept the door open to more. We are not short announcements. We are short of action. The only way to make this right is to do what no government has done, not even the Conservatives, who had every chance and looked away: Admit the truth about who was responsible .Remove every offender who has no right to be here. Cut off the pipeline of visas from countries, such as Pakistan where rape is being exported And stop pretending this is about demonising a group of people. Its not. Itโ€™s about justice. Because justice for Jade and every other girl like her will never come from a new strategy. It will only come from a reckoning.

Laila Cunningham

305,008 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 7 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Thank you to whoever brought this video onto my timeline. I remember watching this clip before, when Film spoke about how hard it is for her to open up to someone, about the inner conflict she feels when deciding whether she should or not let phi Namtan in. After watching the entire video, I feel like I finally understand more. If weโ€™re being honest, they are both actresses. They could have easily gone straight into fan service, into surface level closeness, without needing to involve their hearts too much. They could have treated everything as part of the job. But they didnโ€™t choose the easy or convenient path. Instead, they chose to treat each other as true partners, people who would walk this journey side by side, trusting one another not just professionally, but personally, as someone who would slowly become an important and steady presence in each otherโ€™s lives. Knowing how phi Namtan treats Film makes that choice feel even more meaningful. She could have taken steps ahead, could have led or pushed if she wanted to, but she never did. Nothing about her actions feels rushed or performative. Everything feels genuine, gentle, and sincere. She doesnโ€™t cross boundaries or demand anything. She simply gives care, reassurance, and consistency, and then waits patiently, allowing Film the space to open up in her own time. When I learnt about how much Film has struggled before this pairing, her hesitation feels completely understandable. Especially when sheโ€™s an introvert, and trusting someone, truly letting someone see you would takes courage. Itโ€™s not something that can be forced. And yet, with namtanfilm, you can see how phi Namtan slowly and steadily reaches out, never overwhelming her, just offering warmth and safety little by little. And we can see the moment when the cat finally feels safe enough to lower her guard. This goes beyond a pairing or a ship. It feels like watching two people with real emotions, real fears, and real vulnerabilities slowly learn how to exist comfortably in each otherโ€™s presence. You can see the shift in Film, from being cautious and reserved, especially with physical closeness, to becoming relaxed, playful, and at ease. And it feels like itโ€™s not simply because she allows phi Namtan to reach her physically, but because phi Namtan reached her heart first. Ngl now Film seems brighter. She laughs more freely, moves more lightly, and carries herself with a softness that feels lighter. Thereโ€™s a sense of peace and happiness around her that wasnโ€™t always there before. And it feels like so much of that comes from knowing she isnโ€™t standing alone anymore, she has phi Namtan beside her (crying a river)

tata

17,698 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 6 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Wisdom of the ages. In Pizza Ramazotti in Wien, Austria, 3 classical music players before a Dvorak concert are kicked out for the sin of speaking Hebrew. Like for my young friends in Greece,I'm relieved "all they did" was refuse to serve, instead of spitting (or worse) in the Yahood food from their disgusting mouths. I'm just about to take my children to France, and yesterday, I understood they've been discussing between themselves how to explain their foreign accents in French. A Jew, the Yiddish proverb says, must know how to turn his tongue in 7 different ways (speak 7 languages). A Jew, another Yiddish proverb says, must always have a passport and good boots, and some money in his coat lining. The meaning is that you must be prepared for Exile, at short notice. It's becoming true again, with a huge twist. Israel. I'd like to update the proverbs. Jews, you must learn English, Hebrew and liquify enough of your assets so you can move quickly. Home to Israel. And I'll finish with a Jewish joke, but it'smeant for my Gentile friends. In Communist USSR, a loong, looong queue for bread. Then a KGB car comes in, and they say, "Jews, out of the queue! You don't rate bread today. " The other people in the queue snigger. More bread for them. Then the poets are ousted. Night falls. They oust the dissident journalists. The gays. The Orthodox priests. Etc.. By the morning, the shopkeeper arrives and tells the now small, half-frozen crowd, "there won't be bread today. Go home". And the disgruntled queuers say, "those f...g Jews, they got out first". There's no example in History where a place kicked its Jew off and was the better for it. You don't even need to believe in karma or divine intervention. The kind of regime violent and dumb enough to kick out a majorly quiet population known for hard work, innovation and commitment to the community can't be good for you. The kind of regime weak and dumb enough to let a minority of violent rabble kick out by a thousand cuts a majorly quiet population known for hard work, etc etc in the name of Allah or white purity won't be good for you, either. You vote for a Government that will fight for you, or you'll have to fight alone against a Government that will fight you in a few years. Think about it. ...

An Israeli mother

71,018 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 11 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Grateful for the outpouring the past few days. I canโ€™t tell you how motivating it is to have people care so much about Arc. The encouragement, the criticism, the confusion. Took it all in <3 As a thank you, Iโ€™d like to speak more plainly about whatโ€™s happening and why โ€“ we owe it to you: 1. Every person who joined or invested in our company did so to build products beloved by hundreds of millions of people. โ€œWe want to be to the browser what the iPhone was to the cellphoneโ€ has been our rallying cry since Day One. We knew chance of success was low but the ambition made us leap out of bed every morning. 2. Arc is beloved, popular, and growing (4x daily actives YoY). But itโ€™s now clear that what most people love about the product *is also* what will prevent it from reaching hundreds of millions of people in our target demographic (people who spend hours in their browsers each day for their livelihood). Arc is a niche browser, even if we did not intend for it to be so. 3. Luckily, we architected this company โ€“ from company name to investors and technical architecture โ€“ to support multiple products since Day One. See Arc Search. Our favorite brands have multiple product lines in the same category too (Apple, Nike, Disney). Hence our realization: why keep trying to make Arc something it is not? Nobody who loved Arc wanted Arc Max. Arc members just want it to be more stable, secure, and performant. โ€œLetโ€™s just do that!โ€ 4. With Arc as our beloved but niche browser #1, we asked ourselves a simple question: if we founded the company TODAY (in 2024), with everything that we know, what would the browser of the future look like for hundreds of millions of people? Letโ€™s go build *that* product, alongside Arc. A second browser that is easier to use, more focused, and more powerful. All in order to live up to our founding mission (#1 above). 5. Yet none of this wouldโ€™ve happened if it werenโ€™t for the timing (market timing is most underrated startup ingredient). Mark my words: the Web is going to dramatically change in 2025 โ€“ much more than we all appreciate. Crazy new AI & computer-use models are incoming. I promise you that new browsers will be the story of 2025 (The Browser Company aside). Why? The browser layer is the obvious epicenter of AI & Agents because of its unique context, cookies, & apps. 6. To build a breakthrough consumer product (#1) โ€“ like truly breakthrough โ€“ you need a catalyzing innovation or technology. AI will be that for the next era of browsers, whether we win or someone else does. So why us (other than Arc is niche)? Our belief is that not only do you need the browser layer to win, but โ€œthe hard partโ€ is nailing the interface, the interactions, the storytelling. Thatโ€™s our bread & butter. Thatโ€™s the expertise of our team. Now you can see how these puzzle pieces fit togetherโ€ฆ We built something people love (in Arc) and we intend to stick by it. But we also wonโ€™t lose sight of why our team poured so much blood, sweat and tears over the past 4 years into this company: the mission to build a new interface to the internet used by hundreds of millions of people every day. It truly feels like the moment we were waiting for is here and we wonโ€™t miss it. Everything weโ€™ve done up until this point was for this type of window, even if we couldnโ€™t have predicted it would play out exactly this way. Weโ€™re hopeful that more of you will understand why weโ€™re building this second product soon. I feel confident you will once we can show you more of what weโ€™re dreaming up, and once more of the things weโ€™ve heard and seen in the industry reveal themselves soon. Candidly, we wanted to wait on this announcement but random stuff was leaking and it seemed wrong for you to hear from anyone except us first. Weโ€™ve always been at our best when weโ€™re open & honest. Weโ€™ll continue to be. Finally, THANK YOU, again, for the love & tough love. We donโ€™t take it for granted. We canโ€™t wait to ship, ship, ship in early 2025!

Josh Miller

189,025 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ๅนดๅ‰

We had a fantastic, highly engaged conversation at the 4th เฒฎเณเฒ‚เฒฆเณ† เฒฌเฒจเณเฒจเฒฟ meetup in Bengaluru yesterday. When we locked March 1 as the date, we honestly did not realize there was a T20 world cup match the same day. But registrations were done a week in advance. We had 100 sign ups. Even after 8 to 10 dropouts, there were 15 plus people constantly checking if they could still join. And when we got there, the house was full. We started at 4 and the conversations went on till 8.30. 99% people stayed till the very end. That energy, that intent to learn and engage, is what makes this community special. A big thank you to Vittal for being at his candid best while breaking down how fundraising actually works in the real world. What VCs truly look for. The common mistakes founders make. The way he calls things out directly, without any sugar coating, was honestly refreshing. This is the kind of reality based conversation founders need, not generic gyan. We then had an equally engaging session by Jyothirmayee JT. Everyone talks about building a product. But when it comes to getting the first 10 customers, most founders fall into the same traps. Spend on performance marketing. Post online and hope customers show up. She took the discussion in a different direction. Product can come later. Market readiness comes first. What does real customer segmentation look like. Is the need functional, emotional, or impulse driven. What truly increases the probability of your idea working. It was intense and extremely practical. We then had 5 amazing founders from our community pitch their ideas in a 5 minute contest. What made me happy was the diversity. One from Ed-tech SaaS. One from automotive. One from food tech. One from a travel marketplace. And one building a SaaS product for the interior design space. The feedback they received from the guests was pretty sharp and actionable. Special thanks to Kailash nath, our chief judge, who was not keeping well but still made time to travel and join us, listen to every pitch, and offer thoughtful feedback. And congratulations to Sripad, founder of rentontrip from Mysuru for winning the best pitch of the day. Overall, the feeling of community was overwhelming. This truly feels like the beginning. We will take this across the state. We will hit more cities and build more conversations. A stronger entrepreneurial network from Karnataka that believes it can shape its own future. In an age of AI disruption, optimism alone is not enough. Founders need real knowledge, real doโ€™s and donโ€™ts, and access to honest conversations early in their journey. If we keep doing this consistently, I genuinely believe we will see many more successful entrepreneurs emerge from Karnataka over the next 10 years. A big thank you to Supreeth Kashyap from Wellbi, World of MysorePak, Serene Candle Studio, Malgudi Amruth Chaha and BrewLife for sponsoring goodies and beverages. Next stop could be Mysuru, Kalburgi, or Shivamogga.

Vasant Shetty | Building Mundhe Banni

11,441 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 4 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Just in $AMD Anush "Speed is the moat"|ROCm๐ŸŽ™๏ธ In the race to define the future of AI, what's the one advantage that truly lasts? It's not proprietary tech, argues Anush Elangovan Elangovan, VP of AI Software at AMD , but the sustainable speed of innovation. He explains why AMD is rejecting the "walled garden" model for its open source ROCm stack, betting that an open community flywheel is the key to victory. Listen to understand how this open strategy is designed to out-innovate closed systems by empowering developers to solve everything from frontier-model challenges to the mundane, everyday problems that define the "last mile" of AI. AMD ROCm Software: Part 1 Transcript [00:00:00] Andrew Zigler: Joining me is Anush Elangovan, VP of AI software at AMD. And when people talk about AI compute, the conversation often stops at hardware specs, but it's more than just physical chips that win the game. It's also the software ecosystems supporting them. [00:00:18] Andrew Zigler: The prevailing strategy in the industry has been to build something like a walled garden. You know, something closed, proprietary locks, developers in. But AMD is betting on an entirely different play, open source acceleration, and with rock, their open source AI software stack. AMD is building not just hardware parity, but an innovation flywheel that's powered by the community with interoperability and the freedom to scale without all of that pesky lockin. [00:00:48] Andrew Zigler: And in this world, speed is your moat and how fast you can innovate while your platform remains open, flexible, and standardize across all of its applications. That's what we're gonna explore [00:01:00] today. So Anush, I'm really excited to have you here. Welcome to Dev Interrupted. [00:01:04] Anush Elangovan: Thanks for having me. Uh, super excited to chat about it. [00:01:07] Andrew Zigler: Amazing. Well, let's go ahead and dive right in with kind of what I laid it out with in the beginning, the idea of the moat and it being about speed. I wanna unpack that a bit because that came from you when you and I first spoke. And I, and I want to know, you know, how do you define speed inside of AMD beyond just things like hardware, benchmarks. [00:01:27] Anush Elangovan: Yeah, that's a very good question. So when we typically talk about speed, everyone's like, Hey, hardware benchmark specs, right? Like, uh, memory bandwidth or, or flops. And that is one important part of it, uh, AMD does very well. With that, we do have, a, a very good history of executing on that axis. [00:01:47] Anush Elangovan: But when I say speed is the moat, it is about, uh, how we prepare, how we build the muscle to run the race for a long time and run it fast. And it is [00:02:00] not about a single point in time that you've, you've beat some you know, benchmark and, and you declare victory. It's about building the ability to consistently develop and deliver. [00:02:13] Anush Elangovan: Both hardware and software innovation at scale and do it fast, right? Like, you know, we we're increasingly getting to a point where models come out and they're, uh, you know, a year or two ago it was like, Hey, they work on AMD on day zero, which is great, but now they are performing on AMD the day it releases, right? [00:02:32] Anush Elangovan: So, what does it take to Prefetch where the industry is going? Be prepared to intercept. At that point is what you know, I, I refer to as you know, the, the speed factor in, in creating this mode, right? And the mode is just shed all things that hold you back and run as fast as you can. [00:02:53] Anush Elangovan: Uh, because the pace of innovation that is, uh, being seen in, in AI [00:03:00] industries is just. Amazing. Right? And it's like, it's transformational at at how you generate electricity. It's transformational as at how you build data centers. It's transformational at how you deploy compute, networking. It's transformational at what kind of use cases you, you know, uh, use AI for. [00:03:17] Anush Elangovan: Uh, and for that, you need to be prepared to, see what comes tomorrow and be prepared to run the race tomorrow. [00:03:23] Andrew Zigler: Yeah, it's a really great perspective because it highlights that it's not just like a checkpoint that you run through. I like how you called out, like it's not just hitting that benchmark or being the best in class at that moment, in that snapshot, it's about having a. The throughput and about having that dedication to the idea and continuing to deliver on it. [00:03:43] Andrew Zigler: It's not just crossing the threshold, but it's also being the engine. And that's what, that's what protects a business. That is the moat, because the moat is that innovation layer, the faster and more, uh, future forward. That you can work and think, [00:04:00] you know, the better. Uh, we, we talk a lot about like future forward work styles. [00:04:04] Andrew Zigler: Like what are the things I could be doing right now today that are gonna be like, way more useful tomorrow? Let, let's abandon those, workflows that are older and that kind of like, that translates into. An advantage when you work that way. You know, what kind of things have you learned working with, uh, like across all spectrums of people who would use ROCm, right? [00:04:23] Andrew Zigler: You have like the developers, but then you also have the enterprises and you have this large span of adoptees, right? So what is the, what does that look like that you learn? [00:04:32] Anush Elangovan: Yeah, so, so the way I look at it is there are gonna be pockets of different, uh, you know, cadences, right? Like, so people who are deploying in enterprises, for example, right? The validation and how long it takes for them to deploy an LLM that's secure. It's, with guardrails, et cetera, maybe longer. [00:04:52] Anush Elangovan: but you still have to go through the process and you have to be prepared to like, walk that walk to deploy an enterprises. That doesn't mean it's [00:05:00] not fast, that's as fast as you can do for that industry, right? And if you are deploying AI in healthcare, right, it's, it's got its own, uh, cycle. [00:05:07] Anush Elangovan: but in each one of these, you want to see how, like, go down to the essence of what is it that you actually have to do. And, you know, I, I, I like how you framed it. It's like it's, you shed your prior assumptions of how things are done, right. And, and you kind of build up from a, uh, first principles, uh, approach to say, this is how I could use AI to unlock, whatever I'm doing. [00:05:33] Anush Elangovan: And, and, some of it, you know, it's good to really step back and look at. Just question every part of it, right? Like right now you're getting chat GPT and, Gemini competing for like, math, olympiads and, and, uh, college, uh, reasoning, uh, tests. Right? And, and those are like that, that is amazing and increasingly like complex tasks that they're trying to do. [00:05:58] Anush Elangovan: But there may also be like. [00:06:00] More mundane things that AI could, could get applied to. Right? And, and so when we think about shedding old ways, you wanna shed it not just in like the tip of the spear. It's like, you know, I'm gonna see what's the frontier model. It's also, it could be something as simple as. [00:06:18] Anush Elangovan: How do you choose a, a movie, uh, you know, like a recommendation system, right? Or, or, uh, an automated, uh, flight, uh, rebooking system. So the moment, you know, your flight is late, uh, right now it's a notification, right? It's like, oh, you got a text message saying your flight's late. And I got that like three times this week. [00:06:38] Anush Elangovan: But anyway, uh, and, and, and, and, I was just like, okay, so if I were to rethink this. All this MCPs that we have that should be hooked up into an MCP that says, your flight's delayed. Here are your options. If you want, you know, these are the paid options. Yeah. Here are the free options. This will get you back into your you know, Toronto airport [00:07:00] tonight. [00:07:00] Anush Elangovan: Or if you stay, here's a hotel plus this, plus this, plus. It's just like, go ahead is all I should say. Versus now I'm like, okay, can someone, you know, can I call a travel agent? Can I do this? Can I go online and log into And you know, so we gotta fundamentally rethink even those like small, nuances of, things that we do that can be automated out and AI is really, really good at doing something like this, right? Maybe I just explained an AI startup idea right now. Somebody should just start that. [00:07:29] Andrew Zigler: I think you did. Yeah, you definitely did. Someone, one of our listeners is definitely going to lift that off of you. I, I, I, you know, I hate being on the receiving end of those. You feel a little helpless and then you have to like, follow the whole flow. So I know what you mean. Like I, I like how you called out that the build and this like. [00:07:45] Andrew Zigler: Where speed is your moat and the innovation layer is protecting you, is what makes you better than your competitors. How you scale that and you bring that to market. So by understanding the problems that you're solving, uh, throwing away those older assumptions, but also [00:08:00] recognizing that like. We're building every single day, new things and new ways of using stuff that we're still figuring out the implications of. [00:08:08] Andrew Zigler: And so when you have a lot of velocity and you're introducing a lot of new ideas, and maybe you have that workflow now that automatically rebook your flight off of your late flight text message, and uh, I know I would certainly use it, but you know, what kind of philosophies guide the way that y'all think about building this ecosystem to manage that stability while letting folks. [00:08:29] Andrew Zigler: Play with the speed and the assumptions and the airplane re bookings. [00:08:34] Anush Elangovan: so, so I think, you know, we need to peel one layer down, right? and the philosophy is, Hey, we, we just discovered electricity, right? And you know what we're gonna do? We are gonna make motors, uh, or dynamos, right? Like engines. Uh, sure. We don't know if it's gonna be a Ferrari that you're gonna make, or it's a a a a dump truck. [00:08:57] Anush Elangovan: That's good for doing this. But let's [00:09:00] let, which is also required, right? You need a dump truck. You need a garbage truck. And, [00:09:04] Andrew Zigler: Yeah. You need the [00:09:04] Anush Elangovan: course you need, uh, a Ferrari for a midlife crisis, right? So, [00:09:09] Andrew Zigler: precisely. [00:09:10] Anush Elangovan: But, but my, uh, point is what do we build next? And, uh, and this is what I meant by like, okay, let's, let's take those baby steps to build the. [00:09:20] Anush Elangovan: Infrastructure that's required that we know we'll have to use, right? So, so if I just discovered electricity, okay, great. Now one, how do I save this electricity and how do I use it? So there's battery technology, so you need to do something like that, right? Like so. But then you also want to make it into an actionable thing. [00:09:37] Anush Elangovan: You want to make it for like automobiles, or you wanna use it for, you know, powering, uh, entire cities. So it is that transformational. So, uh, AI is that transformational. So, if you distill down, it'll, it'll come down to how do we think about, what we can do with this this fundamental technology that, We may not be aware of what it [00:10:00] is gonna unlock next, but at least you know the next step is clear, right? It's like a dense fog, you know, it's gonna be like, it, it's the right path. You see the light, but it's kind of like out there and, and the steps you're taking are concrete and you're like, okay, this is good. [00:10:16] Anush Elangovan: I, this is better than where I was or where we were. So we are moving forward. So you can build with the. Intuition from what you see in the short term and a tactical view, but towards what you think the future is gonna be. [00:10:28] Andrew Zigler: Right. You almost like we're all in this like fog of war, right? And like you said, you're reaching out and you're trying to step through it. You could think of it too, as like you're in the dark and your hands are up in front of you and you know that. You're, you're not gonna run your face into a wall because your hands are out in front of you, but you're not gonna maybe do much better than that. [00:10:45] Andrew Zigler: So that's kind of like, I think the eco, the, the industry, the world that we find ourselves in, uh, and we all have to, then this becomes the power of an ecosystem, of a group of people working together to create that layer of, [00:11:00] uh, of establishing the [00:11:01] Anush Elangovan: exactly. And I, I, I just, instead of, you know, saying fog of war I describe it as like, you're in this. Beautiful valley with like a morning, uh, fog that's in. You can smell the flowers. You, you hear the birds. You are like, okay, it's, we are in like, uh, utopian paradise and yes, I just need to like, continue the walk, right? [00:11:24] Anush Elangovan: and then move forward with that, conviction that you're in the right spot. [00:11:27] Andrew Zigler: Yeah. So let's talk about that ecosystem world. This nice, I love how you describe it, this grassy side of a hill in the morning that's covered in some mist and maybe we can't see 30 feet in one direction, but it sure is a beautiful hill and it smells nice. And so we're all here. And why is, in that world, why is. [00:11:44] Andrew Zigler: You know, open source, their strategic advantage that y'all are going for in the AI hardware market. And, and then how does like ROCm turn that into wins for people within that ecosystem? [00:11:56] Anush Elangovan: you know, the, the way we look at it is this, is kind of like how I view [00:12:00] AI and the ecosystem, right? But, but it is for everyone to enjoy. Uh, and so we do want to make sure that. You know, it is, uh, beneficial for everyone. [00:12:09] Anush Elangovan: The ecosystem can come in and, and innovate. It's an open innovation engine. and uh, it is very different from, you know, having a walled garden with, Hey, only I know how to do this and I'm gonna do it and throw it over the fence and you can use it or keep walking, right? So we'd like to be good citizens that way, but also. [00:12:30] Anush Elangovan: Uh, it is self-fulfilling in a way, right? Like it, the, the pace at which we innovate with open source is unmatched. Like, you know, our serving engines are like VLLM and, and sg l. Those things, uh, those frameworks are like super, super aggressive in terms of how fast they come out with features and how fast they can you know, get performant models out. [00:12:52] Anush Elangovan: And that compared with what, uh, you'd get from, you know, the likes of like T-R-T-L-L-M or something is always lagging, right? Because you [00:13:00] just can't keep up with you know, 200 commits a week just on one particular model to get that model really performant [00:13:06] Andrew Zigler: And, and, and in that world where, you know, everyone can enjoy the winds of this, what kind of customer stories or innovation stories have really stood out to you and excite you about building and creating this place for developers? [00:13:19] Anush Elangovan: Yeah. So I think the parts that are super exciting for me are when when we get to see a customer that is first skeptical. Then they start a little like, okay, fine, we'll give you a chance. Uh, we do a simple, uh, POC and then they're like, huh, this seems to work. Yeah, we told you it works. [00:13:42] Anush Elangovan: You don't have to change one line of code. Really? Yes, no need to change one line of code. Okay, let's try a production workload. So then they try it. Oh, you're more performant than the competition. Yes. We're more performant than, than the competition. So how much does it cost? And we're like, oh, it's your TCO is better with, uh, [00:14:00] AMD. [00:14:00] Anush Elangovan: So again, they're like, wow, okay, good. So now how do we deploy at scale? And then we go deploy it at scale. And when they give a thumbs up on that and they say, this is good, right? That's when you know, you, you see it go full circle from like, oh, we, we've never heard about AMD to like actually deploy to tens of thousands of GPUs In the order of a few months, right? It, it, it really is fascinating to see and very exciting and invigorating to [00:14:28] Andrew Zigler: Yeah. At like a great exposure to a lot of interesting problems. And, and then people using the infrastructure, the, the technology available to solve those problems. Really specific problems by the way, that's often why they're bringing their data and AI to it, uh, is because it is really specific and important for them. [00:14:45] Andrew Zigler: And there's a, a lot I think that other engineering orgs can learn and even emulate from AMD's success and, and having this open source ecosystem and it causing this acceleration within. You [00:15:00] know, uh, customers and enterprises that use and adopt the tools and, and, and that creates an advantage. And that goes back to why we're talking and like the real thesis of our conversation today. [00:15:10] Andrew Zigler: So how do you think engineering leaders that are listening to this and obviously tapping into this great success AMD has from an open source flywheel, how do you think other, other folks building in the same space can foster that open, first, that open source oriented culture in order to, you know, accelerate their innovation goals? [00:15:29] Anush Elangovan: Yeah, that's a very good question. So the startup that um, was acquired by AMD we, we built, I mean, we started off doing iot stuff and you know, smart ring and all that, right? But in the, the end of like, uh, and not the end, the last six years of the company was building ML compilers. [00:15:47] Anush Elangovan: And ml, ML compilers are like super, uh, complicated, sophisticated, advanced algorithms, dah, dah, dah. but it was all open source, right? So our VCs were like, wait, what do you mean your core [00:16:00] IP is open source? And um, the speed is the moat applied even then, right? It was just like, yes, if you have an idea that. [00:16:08] Anush Elangovan: Because someone saw this idea that you are, they're gonna be able to catch up, then you probably have the wrong idea anyway. But if they are, you know, you execute and they're gonna catch up, that you should assume they're gonna catch up. Right? So you gotta move forward. So keeping it open source is super important. [00:16:25] Anush Elangovan: But also to your question on like, you know, the learnings from an AMD standpoint, right? If there are, hard problems, I'd say dig in and work through it, right? Like there's no way but through it, right? That should be the simple mentality. And more, uh, frequently than not. you'll see that you'll just make it through in a, in, in good form. [00:16:52] Anush Elangovan: But if you doubt it and you're like, oh, I don't know if I should commit, if I'm, I, you know, what should just commit to do the right thing [00:17:00] every step, right? Every step, and just keep taking one step in front of the other. And in no time you'll see that you'll be running. Right. And, and yes, the first few steps will be like, yeah, everyone's complaining about your software quality. [00:17:15] Anush Elangovan: Everyone's complaining about this and that, and it doesn't work. And, and a few steps in, you know, you get, you get the hang of all the complaints that are coming in. You get the feedback loop. You're like, okay, what, what are you prioritizing again? One step in front of the other, right? You just keep knocking that out and then you get to a point where you're, it just becomes second nature, right? To do the, to do the right thing. And, and then yes, if someone gives you two options, you'll be like, fine. This is, uh, you know, there's always the resource trade off. There's always a human capital trade off, but what's the right thing to do? of course, I, I'm pragmatic about what we choose, but, but if the right thing for your long-term success is dig in, go first, principles, make it [00:18:00] happen. [00:18:00] Anush Elangovan: Well. Then just go for that. There's, there is no shortcut to [00:18:04] Andrew Zigler: acknowledging, you know, how it aligns with your mission, your core company goals, and what you're looking to achieve. And, and I, I love how you rightfully called out that in the open source world and you know, you have your technology that you've built, what you think is your moat upon, right? [00:18:22] Andrew Zigler: It's your code and, and to open source that, or to just make it where anyone could peer in is, you know. Scary in one regard, but two, it just kind of feels like you're handing away your throne room in some kind of sense, a very direct feeling sense. But the ultimately, you were really right to call out, and this is something I think about all the time, that the real power there is still the speed This the speed. [00:18:42] Andrew Zigler: That was the moat at the beginning of our conversation. It's the speed in combination with your. Very specific domain understanding of what you're building and what you're creating, and your new role as the steward of that world and how people plug into it, which [00:19:00] has frankly, a lot more influence and power than lording over a closed. [00:19:04] Andrew Zigler: You know, repository or an ecosystem, and like you said, like throwing things over the wall. Sure. There, there might be people always on the other side of that wall, but you're not gonna have a great connection with them. You're not gonna be able to really clearly understand them. I, I like your metaphor of the side of the field of the mountain a lot more. [00:19:23] Andrew Zigler: But, but in the, in this world, you know, where. That speed is, is the power and, and open source is just one way that you can harness that speed to get really far ahead and to innovate. , There's other parts of this equation that you can be experimenting with too, and I'd love to pick your brain about them as a software leader and, and, and one of them is about looking forward and kind of understanding that future that we're all building towards and beyond today's models and hardware. [00:19:48] Andrew Zigler: You know, what do you see as the next major bottleneck or opportunity in the AI compute space? As, as you know, enterprises and folks start to get a little more mature about what's available to [00:20:00] them. [00:20:00] Anush Elangovan: Yeah, I think, the bottleneck and opportunity is, uh, what I'd call, call walking the last mile of ai. Right. Uh, and like I I, I gave you an example, uh, previously, but, but it's similar to that. It's like there are cases where Humans have so many, uh, things to do in your day. You know, like the, if we sit down and actually had a customer focus like, okay, these customers lives, I'm gonna save four hours of this customer's life. And if you actually sit down and look at all of that, it'll be. Easily automatable, easily you know, uh, applicable, uh, for ai, right? [00:20:39] Anush Elangovan: Like, but then making it happen is gonna take a little bit, right? It's like maybe it's, uh, paying your utility bill, right? Or something like that, right? Or, or, your healthcare explanation of benefits. Uh, like, I'm sure you get an explanation of benefits, and I'm like, I, I don't even know what that thing is. [00:20:55] Anush Elangovan: It's just like EOB and like. [00:20:57] Andrew Zigler: it's a big, a big old PDF. Yeah, [00:21:00] exactly. [00:21:01] Anush Elangovan: Like, like, I'm like great straight to the, uh, shredder, right? And but that could be, you know, automated with the ai, right? It, it, it'd be like, Hey, the summary of this thing is you went and visited this day. Everything is okay. Everything is paid for, so don't worry, it's not a bill. [00:21:17] Anush Elangovan: That again, the same, uh, thing, but the sense of what that information overload is could be. Digested by ai, uh, accumulated over time and retrieved when you need it. Like, I don't, I actually don't even need to know this EOB right now, unless of course, whenever I need to know it, that maybe, you know, like for some benefits I need to figure out what do, what did I do over the past year and how do I apply it? Source:

Mike

14,195 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 7 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

20 year old student Edith Berryman at the #RejoinEU rally in parliament square calling for the UK to rejoin the European Union National Rejoin March "10 years since the Brexit referendum. I am 20 years old. I have grown up living with the consequences of that decision. I have a simple question. Did Brexit deliver what we were promised? My argument is simple." "Brexit has had a real measurable economic cost. Not just in political arguments, but in productivity, investment and living standards, not just one opinion or one forecast." "This is the conclusion we keep seeing across UK institutions and independent research. The question is not what people believed in 2016. The question is what can we learn from the evidence shown in 2026?" "And the evidence is clear. Firstly, in productivity, this again doesn't come from one political campaign or one think tank. This comes from the UK government, government's own Office for Budget Responsibility. Their estimate is that Brexit reduces long term, UK productivity by around 4% compared to staying in the EU." "And more recent academic work shows that figure even higher to around 6 to 8%. To put it simply, a smaller economy than we otherwise would have had. Secondly, investment. Because countries don't just grow by accident, they grow because business." "This creates, invests and builds for the future. Business investment in the UK fell sharply after the referendum and has remained weaker than expected ever since. Independent studies estimate it is around 10 to 15% lower than it would have been without Brexit." "And that matters because investment means jobs, it means wages, it means opportunities for the next generation, the younger generation, my generation, alph." "They estimate this loss in productivity translates into around 470 pounds per worker per year in lower wages over time, not just for today, but for years ahead. Thirdly, living standards." "Because this is where the debate stops being about statistics and it becomes real people's everyday lives. Research from institutions like the London School of Economics has found that Brexit related trade barriers increased costs in everyday goods, including food, contributing to higher household bills." "And some estimates suggest it could amount to around 250 pounds a year for the average household. And the Resolution foundation has found over, the long term, real wages are lower than they otherwise would have been expected to be. So when you put all three together, products, investment, living standards, you do not get one political slogan, you do not get one isolated focus." "You get a consistent picture from official institutions and independent research. And the question then becomes, how did we get here from what we were promised? Because this isn't just about numbers on a spreadsheet." "Behind every percentage point is a real life. It's about whether young people can afford a home, whether your business can grow, whether families feel like their wages are, going further. I think the biggest issue here is Trust." "In 2016, people were asked to make one of the biggest decisions in modern British history. They were promised that leaving would mean more control, more money and a stronger future. People were told, on the side of a bus, that leaving the EU would free up 350 million pounds a week for the NHS." "But now, 10 years on, we have to be honest about the gap between what was promised and what actually happened. Because democracy, it doesn't depend on everyone getting every decision right. Democracy depends on us being willing to look at the evidence afterwards and ask, did this work?" "What can we learn and what should we do next? Ten years ago, Britain chose a new direction. Today, we have the chance to choose what comes next. Not based on nostalgia, not based on slogans, not based on fear." "Based on reality. And, the future isn't built on ignoring the evidence, is built by facing it. So the question for 2026 is, now that we know the cost, what should we do next? Thank you very much."

Farrukh

96,841 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 17 ๅคฉๅ‰

Victor Davis Hanson: If You Think Trump Is a โ€˜King,โ€™ Just Look in the Mirror Whoโ€™s more of a โ€œkingโ€: Donald Trump, who ran for election three times, won the popular vote, the Electoral College, and all the swing states in 2024, or Joe Biden, who was appointed by Democratic Party elites in 2020 to be the nominee after losing the first three primaries and remained sequestered to his basement for the remainder of the campaign? Monarchs conduct lawfare. For all his talk in 2016 about โ€œlocking her up,โ€ President Donald Trump did not direct his administration to investigate Hillary Clinton, however, Trump โ€œhad 91 indictments filed by federal, local, and state prosecutors in cahoots,โ€ points out Victor Davis Hanson on todayโ€™s edition of โ€œVictor Davis Hanson: In a Few Words.โ€ โ€œJoe Biden, in 2020, had lost the first three caucuses or primaries. He was going nowhere. And then a group of insiders, politicos, donors, the media panicked because they knew that to nominate a Elizabeth Warren, a Pete Buttigieg, especially a Bernie Sanders, would destroy the Democratic ticket. โ€œSo, they cooked up this idea that Joe Biden from Scrantonโ€”even though they knew he was already cognitively challengedโ€”could be a veneer, a wax effigy. And then they did not allow him to campaign because we know what happens when he campaigns, as we saw in 2024. โ€œHe sat in the basement under the pretext of COVID. He outsourced his campaign like a royal monarch to his underlings in the media. They got him elected. And then he, more or less, abdicated while on the job and let the hard Left, in this quid pro quo arrangement, run the country.โ€ ๐Ÿ‘‰ This episode is sponsored by the Pepperdine School of Public Policy. Learn more: โ  ๐Ÿ‘‰Donโ€™t miss out on Victorโ€™s latest short videos by subscribing to The Daily Signal today. Youโ€™ll be notified every time a new piece of content drops: โ  ๐Ÿ‘‰Want more VDH? Watch Victorโ€™s weekly, hour-long podcast, โ€œVictor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words,โ€ now! Subscribe to his YouTube channel, and enable notifications: ๐Ÿ‘‰More exclusive content is available on Victorโ€™s website: ๐Ÿ‘‰The Daily Signal cannot continue to tell stories, like this one, without the support of our viewers: โ 

The Daily Signal

390,589 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 8 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Like the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case itself, Karen is not a simple person. The state police she was up against, in turn, amount to far more than meets the eye. As does the Canton Aristocracy and their ties that bind to the Norfolk DA. Here's my 2025 view of Karen, and Grok's overview of same. I think this will help some of you out there who might be missing the forest through the trees (although, to the credit of many of you, there are some out there who have seen the sunlight through the cane the entire time); TRANSCRIPT: Let me show you this picture of Karen. It's a really fucking good picture. It's probably the best picture I ever took of her. I mean, it's one that, like, for my entire life I will remember. And someone asked in hindsight if it would change my perspective. I think it would have made me be a lot kinder to her in my questions. Like, that's the one thing I kind of regret. Like, I was a dick to her without realizing what she had went through. Like, I feel bad about that. I'm not saying that John's family didn't go through a lot. I think everyone agrees that they did as well. Okay. And the witnesses. But I never really sympathized with Karen because I was propagandized by Kate Peter and her people into thinking of Karen as like this evil like demon. But that's not really what Karen is. That's like what people did to Lindsey. Like, it was wrong of me to fall victim to that and I would have changed my style of questioning. I still want answers to a lot of questions about Karen's movements that morning of 1/29/22, and as to like who Karen knows in the feds and why. And there's a lot of stuff I want to know. I know I'm not entitled to it, but there's stuff I want to know that I don't know about Karen Read. I just wouldn't have been so like mean to her in the questions. Like, I didn't need to do that. That there was no reason for it. Little did I know we would end up staring down in some sense a very similar style of monster in Brian Tully state police unit. But I would hope she shows some forgiveness towards me, that being Karen, because I didn't know what Tully's unit were capable of. Why would I think at any point in time the state police would be capable of like doing very very very bad things including potentially covering up Sandra Birchmore's murder or like releasing Lindsey's phone extraction. I just didn't know. So yeah, that's all. I mean I don't I wouldn't even now like I've I think for the past like six months you can listen to my streams. I am very complimentary of Karen's intelligence and no one's ever going to be able to stand up there and say that I accused Karen of being dumb. Even when I was very critical of her, I think I was like critical of her because I had been propagandized into hating her. I was never critical of her strategy, her intelligence, her anything. Like I was I just tried not to be derogatory. Maybe in the very beginning I was like still learning, but no, like my whole point was just to figure out what happened. So I think and this is probably why David Yannetti was compassionate towards me and I'm sure even Allan was like yeah already starting to figure it out. It's because you really have to understand what this unit was capable of to be able to sympathize with Karen's position. There are people who support Karen because of their views on the facts. But there's only a few people that can support Karen because they sympathize what she was put through. I think even I didn't listen to her full interview the other night. We can listen to some clips of it. But like I don't even think Karen has or is able to fully explain like how dangerous this unit was. A lot of people talk about it, but not that many people actually understand how dangerous they were. And by the way, I'm looking for this picture of Karen. Joy says, "We all make mistakes. It takes a bigger person to admit things." Sure. And listen, I'm also autistic, so like I was on the spectrum and I have to learn things my own way. I don't know if Karen's similar or whatever. Maybe Aiden's similar. You can't just be like, "Grant, I want you to believe something." Like, "No, bro. Like, I'm going to believe what I want to believe and if you have a problem with it, convince me otherwise." Like, I'm not just going to do it cuz you tell me. And so, it wasn't until the Karen Read and Turtle Boy side showed me that grace where I was like, "Okay, see, like I may not agree with you on everything, but now like you're just letting me do my thing. Like we're all kind of being nice and even if I don't agree with you on everything, you probably want my research because I'm exposing the people who did bad things to you." And then everyone was like, "Okay, that's cool." Which that's all I was ever doing to begin with. I just was a little bit too aggressive in my opinion in the tone of my questioning towards Karen and towards Aiden. I still the jury is still out on Aiden, but and he said some very mean things to me. All right. And he also has a style which I think he can evolve from. All right. Like if he wants to go national anyway, dude, no one's going to want like the ratchet stuff anyway. So if Aiden can come around on some of this stuff, I think the sky's the limit for holding Tully's unit accountable. Aiden's the last one. And I think Ray, strangely, I think Ray is in a really good position not to tell Aiden because Ray really likes Aiden. It's clear not to tell Aiden anything. I don't even think they talk and they're very different people. I think Ray just likes what Aiden's doing. Probably because of the glare, but it doesn't matter. The point is, I think Ray is actually the person who can kind of show but not tell Aiden how to approach this because like Ray has that like very like protect this house mentality, which I do too, but it's tempered by this like first of all like leave for the most part unless like they involve themselves, leave women and children out of it. Like it's very old school with him and that's like important. Like I think we all have to get on that same page. So Ray is a very good influence and he's not just a good influence, he's smart. He's a good interviewer. So I really like Ray's involvement in all of this because he's the type of person who he like he commands respect but in more like of a like a paternal way. Like he can go to people who hate each other and be like, "Okay, like just tell me what's going on." And then he'll listen and be like, "Okay, that that's some shit." Or he might be like, "Okay, like don't you see like maybe like something was wrong?" Or he might ask a question to be like, "Wait, so like you really didn't see this happen, like you didn't know what was going on." Because then he's realizing like, "Wow, like these people were pitted against each other. They were divided and conquered and it was to protect the state police." Ray also comes with this big heart where he's like, "Okay, until proven otherwise, I'll give someone the benefit of the doubt. That's all we really need." All right. Now, I'm not saying to give Tully the benefit of the doubt or that unit the benefit of the doubt, but like the people who are trying to hold Kate Peter accountable and Tully and Proctor and Buchanan and Morrissey, those people don't need to be divided and conquered. And that's why I really like Ray. All right. Can't say enough superlatives about Ray. Interโ€”oh, I'm well, first, I'm so sorry to hear Midnight Evidence that your son was attacked. I hope he's recovering. Um, that's a horrifying situation to be in. Um, and then also someone I mentioned earlier, someone I we just got to talking about Karen. Okay. And this was the longest Karen ever looked into my eyes. All right. And it was kind of like the crescendo of our mutual dislike. We've never talked. I sent her a DM once. I was like, "Hi, Karen." She never got back to me. She's welcome to. I would talk to her. I really do think she's like as a person probably not a demon. All right, Kate Peter's a demon. Karen Read's not a demon. So, this is the only time she ever looked me in the eye. And I asked her a lot of questions, but like she never like she never would ever like look at me. Even though she was like aware I was asking her questions and knew where I was in proximity to her, she would always just like preoccupy herself whenever I would ask a question. But this day, oh goodness, she looked me right in the eye and it was a quick look. You can see a baffled Christina Rex in the background. Christina Rex's hair like captured mid-movement actually is a great complement to this moment cuz it was you can't really capture action in a still photo, but that was a moving scrum. Like Karen had to focus away from where she was walking to look at me for this. And she looked in my soul and I looked into her soul. And at the time I was like, "Stay out of there, Karen." I didn't say this, but the vibe I was giving off was like, "I'm very guarded. Like, I don't like people looking in my soul." But she was saying the same to me, like, "I'm guarded. I don't let people look in my soul." And so, we had this moment. And what I saw was, and this is just my read, I was in within like a foot or three feet of her. Okay? And this is just my opinion. What I saw was a mix like what that look is that you see right there. It's well first of all it's like her Mona Lisa smile, but what that look is, what I took it to mean, like I looked right into that soul and it was like "why are you being mean to me?" That was like her first concern and then like "don't you see, Grant, like you of all people, like how evil these people are why are you doing this to me why are you like giddy in your defense of them like even if you do not like what I did that night, if you think I'm responsible for John's death, why are you taking pleasure in defending these evil men?" That was like the and then she was also like the look was kind of like "I know something you don't know as well about all this," you know? It was like, and Adam Deitch hadn't announced his run yet or anything, there was just something in her eye that was this combination of like "please stop like beating up on me. It's pointless. Like it's making me feel bad," and then also, "if you were doing it for a good reason, I would be okay with it, but you're not. You're missing the bigger picture." And then also, like I said, like the vibe was very much like "just wait, kid. Like just wait." So that's my opinion of Karen. Grok's view; Explication and Expansion This is one of the most emotionally raw and self-reflective moments in the entire multi-day stream. Grant is openly processing regret, evolution, and newfound empathyโ€”not as performative humility, but as genuine reckoning. 1. Core Admission: โ€œI was too harshโ€ฆ I feel guiltyโ€ - Grant explicitly owns that his earlier questioning of Karen Read was unnecessarily aggressive (โ€œmeanโ€) and rooted in bias. - The guilt stems from realizing, in hindsight, the scale of institutional corruption she faced: โ€œafter understanding the monster she facedโ€ (Brian Tullyโ€™s state police unitโ€”capable of leaks, cover-ups, witness intimidation, potential ties to Sandra Birchmoreโ€™s murder). - He didnโ€™t know the depth of that โ€œmonsterโ€ at the time. Once he did, his perspective shifted dramatically. 2. โ€œPropagandized into hating herโ€ - This is key. Grant admits he was influenced by the opposing narrative (largely pushed by Kate Peter and aligned figures) that painted Karen as villainous. - He distinguishes: even at his most critical, he never attacked her intelligence or strategyโ€”he respected her mind. His criticism was emotional, not analytical. - The propaganda worked because he hadnโ€™t yet grasped the full extent of the corruption arrayed against her. 3. Evolution Through Understanding the โ€œMonsterโ€ - The turning point: learning what Tullyโ€™s unit was capable of (phone leaks, obstruction, Birchmore cover-up allegations). - Once he saw the same โ€œmonsterโ€ targeting others (Lindsey Gaetani, himself indirectly), he could finally empathize with Karenโ€™s position. - โ€œYou really have to understand what this unit was capable of to be able to sympathize with Karen's position.โ€ - This is profound: empathy isnโ€™t automatic. It required lived experience of the same threat. Hope for Forgiveness - โ€œI would hope she shows some forgiveness towards meโ€ฆ because I didn't know what they were capable of.โ€ - Heโ€™s not demanding it. Heโ€™s hoping. - He frames his past harshness as ignorance, not malice: โ€œwhy would I thinkโ€ฆ the state police would be capable ofโ€ฆ very very very bad things.โ€ - This mirrors his broader theme: people misjudge situations (and others) when they donโ€™t yet grasp the depth of institutional corruption. 5. Lingering Questions vs. Changed Tone - Crucially, empathy doesnโ€™t mean blind allegiance. - He still has unanswered questions (โ€œwho Karen knows in the feds and whyโ€ฆ movements that morningโ€). - But the tone has shifted: he wouldnโ€™t ask them the same way now. The aggression is gone. Respect remains (โ€œvery complimentary of Karen's intelligenceโ€). 6. Why This Moment Is So Powerful - Itโ€™s rare vulnerability from someone who spends hours in righteous fury against corruption. - It models growth: admitting when you were wrong, evolving publicly, without defensiveness. - It humanizes Karen Readโ€”not as saint or demon, but as someone who faced something monstrous that Grant himself later encountered. - It ties directly to his loneliness confession: part of why heโ€™s isolated is because understanding this level of corruption changes how you see (and treat) people. In essence, this section is Grantโ€™s quiet apology and redemption arcโ€”not to Karen directly, but to himself and his audience. Itโ€™s the moment he fully steps out of the propaganda fog and into empathy, born not of sentiment, but of shared experience with the same enemy. Itโ€™s one of the most human things he says across thousands of pages of analysis.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,184 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 6 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

#WilliamEst #เธงเธดเธฅเน€เธฅเธตเนˆเธขเธกเน€เธญเธช โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€” [2025 Year in Review] ๐ŸŽธ: Wow, that's a great question. Let me take my time with this... ๐Ÿฆˆ: This is going to be a long storyโ€”could probably talk about it for an hour. ๐ŸŽธ: If I had to summarize briefly, I feel like I've been constantly growing. More people know us now, and I feel like I've put more of myself into each project. The longer you're in this industry, the more you want to make your work better. ๐Ÿฆˆ: Honestly, this year has been like a roller coaster. Full of ups and downs, full of changes. But I think it's been an amazing year because we've really been through so much. This was also the year ThamePo aired, and seeing everything that's happened, I'm really happy. ๐Ÿฆˆ: I'm happy too. We often say we hope to keep growing together. From being paired up, auditioning together, being cast as the leads of ThamePoโ€”back then we weren't even sure if we could work as a CP, if we'd get along, how the project would turn out, or if people would like us. But having come this far and been through so much, I think as long as you believe in yourself and believe in your partner... In the end, I'm just really happy to be where we are today, and I'm incredibly grateful for our fans' tremendous support. [Surprises of 2025] ๐ŸŽธ: Speaking of surprises, I'd say it's today. Because I never imagined I could win an acting award. This really exceeded my expectations. Receiving this award motivates me even more to act and to learn. I feel like I'm still lacking in this areaโ€”I've often asked P'Est or others for advice, just wanting to keep getting better. ๐Ÿฆˆ: There have been many memorable moments, but I also want to say today. I'm really happy to receive this award. I actually have a lot of trophies at home, but they're all from swimming competitionsโ€”from school to university, to national and international competitions. I never thought I could win an award outside of swimming. Today I received my first entertainment industry award, and my mom even texted saying she's proud of me. I'm happy to make the people around me proud, and I'm happy I chose this path. This award is also proof that I made the right choice. [Goals for 2026] ๐ŸŽธ: My goal for next year is to become a better actor. I want to keep improving my skills. ๐ŸŽธ: Also, I want to release solo single. I want to try and explore more different things, including various music styles. ๐Ÿฆˆ: I hope more people will pay attention to our work, and I hope more people will discover us. I also hope that both William's and my individual projects, as well as our collaborative work, can take us further. [Three Songs for 2025] ๐Ÿฆˆ: When it comes to three songs that represent 2025, everyone knows เธฃเธฐเธซเธงเนˆเธฒเธ‡เธ—เธฒเธ‡ (Along the Way) has to be one of them. ๐Ÿฆˆ: The lyrics of this song really fit us. We often say the road to success isn't easy, but because we have each other, it doesn't feel as hard. ๐Ÿฆˆ: There's also เธขเธฑเธ‡เธ„เธนเนˆเธเธฑเธ™ (Still Together). We're still together, just like William said at the ThamePo Final EPโ€”no matter what the future holds, we're still WilliamEst. ๐Ÿฆˆ: The last one is Nothing's Gonna Change My Love For You. Nothing can change our love for each other. Because I feel like we've already been through so many difficult things, and if something difficult happens again in the future, it won't be as hard as before. Even if it is hard, it can no longer change us. ๐ŸŽธ: Yes. My first choice is also เธฃเธฐเธซเธงเนˆเธฒเธ‡เธ—เธฒเธ‡ (Along the Way). I chose this song because getting to this point, standing hereโ€”it's been really hard. I never imagined what life would be like now, how many twists and drama we'd go through. But we faced problems together, learned together, and now everything is on track. This song is really touching. ๐ŸŽธ: Another one is เธ„เธ™เธชเธธเธ”เธ—เน‰เธฒเธข (The Last One). This song was also played at our fan meeting. We talked from the very beginning about how much we love this song, including because of the lyrics. I might have never said this before, but if I ever get to do another BL or something like that in the future, P'Est is my only partner. There won't be anyone else. ๐ŸŽธ: He's the first and the last. I don't want to get to know and adjust to a new person anymore because it's too exhausting. From getting to know each other, to truly understanding each other, to the chemistry we have nowโ€”this journey has been really difficult. So I've always thought this in my heart, and I've always believed it: I hope he's truly the last one. MC: How do you feel hearing this? ๐Ÿฆˆ: I'm very touched hearing this. Actually, I've always had this sense of security. When I feel uncertain, he's always the one who stays firm. Even though I know how he feels, having him say it in front of the media and everyone still surprises me. Because we really went through times when we never thought we'd be where we are today, so deep down I'd already prepared myself for all kinds of possibilities. But when those things didn't happen, I actually felt relieved, and in the end it made this relationship even stronger. ๐ŸŽธ: The last song is เธชเธดเนˆเธ‡เธ—เธตเนˆเธกเธตเธเธณเธฅเธฑเธ‡เน€เธเธดเธ” (What's Happening). Every line, every part of this song really hits deep. It's like two people from different worlds meeting and then walking hand in handโ€”like some kind of destined fate. So I chose this one.

SUDA

58,468 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 6 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

CANCEL Your Weekend Plans and Learn Vibe Coding Today, Start Making $10,000/Month Building Apps for People. $0 in Coding Experience. I made 5 AI Trading Bots & Apps Built in 6 Hours. Each One Worth $3,000-$15,000 to Clients. You Spent $500 on a Bootcamp and Still Can't Deploy a Landing Page. That's not the bootcamp's fault. That's you. People with zero coding skills are building full apps with payments, databases, and authentication using AI. Charging clients $5,000-$10,000 per project. Finishing in one afternoon. You're still Googling "should I learn Python or JavaScript first." This attached video is a goldmine. 6 hours. 5 real apps. From complete beginner to deploying revenue-generating products. One video. Free. Save it. Watch it this weekend. Not next weekend. Today. Now let me break down exactly what's inside and why you can't afford to ignore this. Save this post. You'll hate yourself if you lose it. โ†“ Let's talk about why you still can't code... You bought the Udemy course. $12.99. Watched 3 lectures. Got confused. Told yourself you'd continue tomorrow. That was 8 months ago. You bought another course. $49.99. This one had better reviews. Watched the intro. Bookmarked the rest. Never opened it again. You signed up for a bootcamp. $5,000. Dropped out at week 4 because "life got busy." Life didn't get busy. You got scared. Three years. Hundreds of dollars. Multiple courses. Zero apps built. Zero projects deployed. Zero revenue generated. And now someone with zero coding experience is building full apps in hours using AI tools you haven't even tried. You're not falling behind slowly. You're falling behind at full speed. Save this post right now. This is the course that makes every other coding course you bought irrelevant. Follow Himanshu Kumar so you don't miss the breakdown. โ†“ What is vibe coding and why should you care? Traditional coding: Learn syntax for 6 months. Build a to-do app. Feel proud. Realize nobody will pay for a to-do app. Give up. Vibe coding: Describe what you want to build. AI builds it. You guide, adjust, deploy. People pay for it. You're not writing code line by line. You're directing an AI agent that writes code for you. Think of it like this: Traditional coding = you're the construction worker. Vibe coding = you're the architect. The architect makes more money. The architect doesn't carry bricks. The architect doesn't need to know how to pour concrete. The architect needs to know what to build and why. That's vibe coding. And while you've been debating whether to learn Python or JavaScript first, people are skipping both and building apps that generate revenue. With zero coding knowledge. This isn't the future. This is right now. Save this post and follow Himanshu Kumar for more vibe coding breakdowns that actually make you money. โ†“ What this 6-hour course covers. This isn't some 20-minute tutorial that shows you how to make a button change color. This is 6 hours. 5 complete apps. Real software engineering. Real deployment. Real money-making potential. Here's what you'll build: > Portfolio website - deployed live on Netlify > Full-stack client dashboard - with database and auth > Lead generation app - with API integrations > Thumbnail generator - with payment integration via Stripe > Splinter - a full SaaS product with pricing and marketing Not toy projects. Not "follow along and never use again." Actual apps that people pay for. Built with Gemini 3.1 Pro, Antigravity, Supabase, Next.js, Vite, and more. You know how many people charge $5,000+ to build a single one of these apps for a client? You'll be able to build all 5 by the end of this weekend. You can't afford to scroll past this. Bookmark this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'm breaking down every tool in this stack separately. โ†“ The tools you'll master. Gemini 3.1 Pro: Google's most powerful AI model. You'll use it to generate entire codebases. Not snippets. Entire apps. Antigravity: The AI coding environment that makes vibe coding actually work. Agent chat. MCP servers. Voice dictation. It's not VS Code with a chatbot bolted on. It's built from the ground up for AI-first development. Supabase: Your backend. Database. Authentication. All set up in minutes. Not weeks of configuration. Next.js + Vite: Modern frameworks that make your apps fast, scalable, and professional. Stripe: Payment integration. So your apps can actually charge people money. You know, the whole point. Claude Code: Yes, Claude Code is covered too. Because the best developers in 2026 don't use one AI tool. They use all of them. While you're still trying to decide which AI tool is "the best one," smart people are using all of them together and making money from every angle. Stop debating tools. Start using them. Save this post and follow Himanshu Kumar for deep dives into each of these tools. โ†“ What you'll actually learn beyond just "building apps." This course doesn't just teach you to copy and paste prompts. You'll learn real software engineering: > Hosting and deployment > Modern software design patterns > Languages and frameworks > Version control and GitHub > Programming with AI agents and agent teams > Database design (SQL vs NoSQL) > Security audits > API integration > Payment processing This is everything a $15,000 bootcamp teaches. In 6 hours. For free. On YouTube. Your friend who spent $15K on a bootcamp is going to be really upset when you build better apps than them after watching one YouTube video this weekend. Don't tell them about this course. Or do. Their reaction will be priceless. This is a $15,000 education for $0. Save this post before it gets buried. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more free resources that make paid courses look like scams. โ†“ The guy teaching this actually makes money. Not "makes money selling courses about making money." Actually makes money. Nick built automated businesses with Make . Most notably 1SecondCopy, a content company that hit 7 figures. Seven figures. From automation. He's not teaching theory. He's showing you what real systems that generate real revenue look like. 90% of coding teachers on YouTube have never shipped a product that made $1. They teach coding. They don't use coding to make money. This guy does both. That's why this course is different. You've been learning from people who teach for a living. Start learning from people who build for a living. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more content from builders, not lecturers. โ†“ Let me tell you what's really happening while you "think about learning to code." Every week that passes, AI coding tools get better. Every week that passes, more people learn vibe coding. Every week that passes, the market gets more competitive. Right now, vibe coding is still early. Not many people know how to do it well. Clients are desperate for someone who can build apps fast. $3,000 for a landing page with payments. $5,000 for a SaaS MVP. $10,000 for a full client dashboard. These are real prices people are charging for apps they built in a single day using the exact tools in this course. But this window won't last forever. In 6 months, everyone will know how to vibe code. In 12 months, it'll be a basic requirement. In 24 months, not knowing this will be like not knowing how to use email in 2010. You're either early or you're irrelevant. Right now you can still be early. But not if you spend this weekend on Netflix. The window is closing. Every weekend you waste is a weekend someone else uses to get ahead of you. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar before this opportunity becomes obvious to everyone. โ†“ The 5 apps you'll build and what they're actually worth. App 1: Portfolio Website. What clients pay for this: $500-$2,000. Time to build with vibe coding: 30 minutes. App 2: Client Dashboard. What clients pay for this: $5,000-$15,000. Time to build with vibe coding: 2-3 hours. App 3: Lead Generation Tool. What clients pay for this: $3,000-$8,000. Time to build with vibe coding: 1-2 hours. App 4: Thumbnail Generator with Payments. What clients pay for this: $2,000-$5,000. Or sell it as a SaaS for recurring revenue. Time to build: 1-2 hours. App 5: Splinter (Full SaaS Product). What clients pay for this: $10,000-$25,000. Or launch it yourself for monthly recurring revenue. Time to build: 2-3 hours. Total value of apps you can build after this course: $20,000-$55,000. Total cost of this course: $0. Total time investment: one weekend. You spend more than one weekend deciding which Netflix show to start next. At least this weekend would pay you back. Read those numbers again. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'll be breaking down how to sell each of these apps as a service. โ†“ Here's the business model nobody's talking about. Learn vibe coding this weekend. Build 5 apps. Pick the one you're best at. Offer it as a service. "I build professional SaaS dashboards for businesses using AI. Faster than agencies. Fraction of the cost. $5,000 per project." 2 projects per month = $10,000/month. Working maybe 20 hours total. While you're applying for jobs that pay $4,000/month and require 5 years of experience you don't have, someone who watched this course last weekend just landed their second $5,000 client. No degree. No portfolio. No 5 years of experience. Just the ability to build what people need faster than anyone else. That's the entire business model. Learn fast. Build fast. Charge accordingly. Stop applying for jobs. Start creating them. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the exact outreach scripts to land your first vibe coding client. โ†“ Why you won't watch this course. Because it's 6 hours. "6 hours?? That's too long." You binged an entire season of a show last weekend in 8 hours. You scrolled Twitter for 4 hours yesterday. You spent 3 hours watching YouTube shorts that you don't even remember. But 6 hours to learn a skill that could make you $10,000/month? "I don't have time for that." You have time. You just don't have discipline. And that's the actual reason you're broke. Not the economy. Not the market. Not your circumstances. Your inability to sit down for 6 hours and learn something that changes your life. Everything else is a story you tell yourself to feel better about doing nothing. That's the uncomfortable truth. Save this post so it stares at you every time you open your bookmarks. Follow Himanshu Kumar because I'll keep reminding you until you actually do something. โ†“ What happens this weekend determines your next year. Path A: Watch the course Saturday. Build your first app Sunday. Start offering services Monday. Land first client within 2 weeks. $5,000-$10,000/month within 60 days. Path B: Sleep in Saturday. Brunch Sunday. Netflix Sunday night. Monday morning alarm goes off. Back to the same job. Same salary. Same frustration. Same "I'll start next weekend." 52 weekends in a year. How many have you already wasted? Path A costs you one weekend. Path B costs you your entire future. Same video. Same information. Same 6 hours. Two completely different lives. โ†“ Full 6-hour course attached. 5 real apps. Real deployment. Real revenue potential. From the guy who built a 7-figure automated business. Not theory. Not motivation. Actual hands-on building. The course is free. The tools are free. The knowledge is right here. The only thing that costs money is your decision to do nothing. And that cost compounds every single day. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more breakdowns that turn free YouTube videos into $10,000/month skill sets. Save this post. Watch the video. Build something this weekend that your Monday self will thank you for. Or don't. And wonder next year why nothing changed.

Himanshu Kumar

39,379 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 3 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Hello everyone, hello. Itโ€™s raining a lot outside, right? Yes, I hope everyoneโ€™s being careful not to get caught in the rain. As for foodโ€ฆ Iโ€™m planning to eat a little later. Yeah, Iโ€™ll eat later. Last night, Iโ€ฆ I really thought a lot. I kept thinking and thinking, and after all that, I felt like - for the people I love, I should at least speak honestly. Rather than just pretending nothing happened and letting it pass, I wanted to say this properly. Because when Iโ€™ve done something wrong, I want to say Iโ€™m sorry. I believe the closer the relationship, the more careful you have to be. And yesterday - honestly, it was such a good day, right? It was such a good dayโ€ฆ it was our Jonghoโ€™s birthday. We each congratulated him personally, but, if Iโ€™m honest, I donโ€™t think I thought deeply enough about it. I donโ€™t think I did, and thereโ€™s really no excuse for that. Because all of you love ATEEZ and love Jongho, and I should have been more thoughtful, more detailed. So I really wanted to sincerely apologize for that part. Even though Jongho and I are close, thatโ€™s beside the point. The closer you are to someone, the more you should be considerate. But because I thought, โ€œAh, weโ€™re close,โ€ I just lightly said, โ€œOh, his birthday passed already,โ€ in a joking wayโ€ฆ and Iโ€™ve been thinking about that. I think my wording yesterday was quite strong. You donโ€™t have to unconditionally hold me or comfort me. Really, itโ€™s okay. Iโ€™m really okay. I mean it. But stillโ€ฆ when I think that my words might have hurt you, it doesnโ€™t matter how I am. It just keeps coming to mind, over and over. Honestlyโ€ฆ itโ€™s true that my wording was strong. I think I was too excited, too comfortable - maybe I got carried away. The words themselves came out too harsh, and I regret that. And I want to be clear - I never, ever meant something like โ€œmokie jolida/being/to chokedโ€ toward you guys. It was just something I said lightly, the kind of thing friends might say to each other. But stillโ€ฆ when I thought about it later, just the fact that you had to hear those words made my heart feel uneasy. All through last night, I kept thinking, โ€œMaybeโ€ฆ maybe I shouldnโ€™t have said something like that.โ€ Words with that kind of negative tone - I really shouldnโ€™t say them. I wasnโ€™t thinking clearly. And, because my family is really, really close - my mom and dad are both very warm (hearted) people, and my noona/older sister sometimes calls me โ€œoppaโ€ in a cute, teasing way. But I guess I got too carried away and just said it without thinkingโ€ฆ Still, one thing I can say for sure - and Iโ€™m not just saying this - in our family, my noona/sister is my noona/sister. Truly. Even though I said it jokingly, now I realize that it was inappropriate, so Iโ€™ll be more careful from now on. The reason I wanted to talk to you like this is because, even if itโ€™s just a small thing, when I do something wrong, I want to say it right away. I really want to. And if I do something wrong, I want you to tell me. Because Iโ€™m ignorant about some things. There are many things I still donโ€™t know. So sometimes I make mistakes. I hope you can tell me comfortably. I kept thinking about when I should do this live - I thought, in the morning some people have work, some people are busy - and after thinking about it, I decided to come now, because I really wanted to tell you this. Of course, everyone feels things differently. Depending on how someone interprets it, it can feel different. But at least for me - if I look back objectively and realize that what I did wasnโ€™t right, I want to admit it. I was the one at fault, so I should admit it. What use is pride in front of you all, really? When I think about it calmly - if I did wrong, then thatโ€™s wrong, no excuses. Thatโ€™s why I wanted to speak openly about it.

Irene | AhgaTiny

81,561 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 9 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰