Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Before #ZackSnyder got involved, #Watchmen was almost a VERY different movie. "When I first got the script...it was a PG-13 movie, it was 2-hours long, it was sequel-able... "Adrian dies - killed by Nite Owl at the end - very little Manhattan, very little of Comedian's funeral. "It's just...

22,892 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

"'Caddyshack' (1980) was a little disappointing when it came out and now it's just a miraculous irony that people have continued to embrace the film and love it." --- Harold Ramis Full Excerpt: "The fact that people are still watching 'Caddyshack' (1980) & showing it to their kids, their grandchildren and still talking about it amazes me because when the movie came out, we actually were a little disappointed because Doug Kenney and I had just done 'Animal House' (1978) and we were so arrogant at the time as we were writing 'Animal House' with Chris Miller. We would actually think to ourselves that it would be the most successful comedy of all time; which it turned out to be . It was like a grandiose delusion that was turned real on us. So then we thought well now we'll do 'Caddyshack' & that it will be the most successful comedy ever. we will do better than 'Animal House' and it didn't. It did half as well and a lot of critics scorned us. The New York Times called it an "amiable mess" which I kind of liked. I thought "all right I'll take amiable and the mess I can live with." So, it was a little disappointing when it came out and now it's just a miraculous irony that people have continued to embrace the film and love it. I once recognized the strange fact that when people used to read TV Guide and they would rate movies. 'Caddyshack' was a two-star movie for the first 10 years. Then at some point I noticed that it got a third star in the same publication and I thought "maybe it's like wine, the longer you keep it in, it just gets a little better."" (Harold Ramis' interview to AFI, 2009)

DepressedBergman

42,447 views • 5 months ago

Mike Nichols on how the young audiences reacted to 'The Graduate' (1967) when it was first screened: "Interviewer: "'The Graduate' (1967) was a phenomenon when it opened…how did it feel to suddenly be considered a hero of the 1960s youth movement when you were in your mid thirties? Nichols: Very weird, actually. But it wasn’t quite like that at first. Joseph E. Levine made us take the film around to college campuses. After we’d showed it to a bunch of younger audiences there, the question on everyone’s lips was, “How come it’s not about Vietnam?” The only way college students could apparently get laid in those days was to be very serious and concerned about the war, so 80 to 90 percent of the kids said, “We can’t tell whether you are for or against Vietnam in this movie.… What are we supposed to think?” That was their criterion. They had no idea what they were looking at. It wasn’t until we got the movie in front of audiences that we felt like younger viewers would feel a kinship with it. We previewed 'The Graduate' in a theater on 86th Street; we just showed up and essentially flung the movie on top of another feature to surprise people. And in the last five minutes—starting with the melee in the church—everyone stood and cheered. I mean, it was like being at a prizefight. And it wasn’t even a finished print; I still had the sound in a box on my lap, because we hadn’t fully mixed the movie yet. Poor Dustin was white as a sheet; it was his first time seeing the movie and he was stunned by the reaction. We all were." (Mike Nichols' interview with David Fear, TimeOut, 2012)

DepressedBergman

34,515 views • 6 months ago

Richard Donner on why he made 'Superman' (1978) & the movie's connection to François Truffaut's 'Jules & Jim' (1962): "I certainly didn’t know it when we were making 'Superman' (1978) [that it would have a profound impact on millions of people around the world]. I was just trying to make the best movie I could make. I think it was during the first showing I attended — not the opening, but a regular screening in a theater, in New York. I watched the audience experience that movie and I was very moved, very excited. Before I came on board, the script was kind of a parody of a parody, It had been really well written by three or four really good writers, but they had been directed by a couple of Hungarians [producers Alexander and Ilya Salkind] who saw it as a comic book rather than a piece of history. Their script didn’t have any respect for what the character stood for, since I was a little kid. Tom Mankiewicz and I had known each other for years, and we’d always talked about working together, so I presented him with the problem, I asked him to bring a sense of reality, or verisimilitude, to the story. I wanted to be able to prove that a man could fly. Tom rewrote the entire script. Years before, there had been a French film called 'Jules and Jim' (1962, Truffaut), a great film. Two guys fall in love with the same woman. That’s what Superman was: two guys in love with the same woman. It happened to be that the two guys were the same guy, but not in the woman’s eyes. I asked Tom ‘How do we make that into a love story?’ He just fell right into it." I was trying to let the audience know that they were not looking at a comic book, or what had been done with Superman over the ages. This was the true story of Superman. In my eyes, when I was a kid, he was real. And he was in Tom’s eyes, too. We decided that’s the way we wanted the movie to be." (Richard Donner's interview with Michael P Coleman, 2020)

DepressedBergman

36,100 views • 7 months ago