正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Beijing’s answer is basically: Ask it ten thousand times. The answer will still be the same. China is a Pacific country. China is not bound by a notification regime it never joined. When China gives advance notice, that is responsible conduct. It is not an admission that South Pacific...

OopsGuess's profile picture

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

57,575 subscribers

41,067 次观看 • 14 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

China slaps down Palau’s malicious attempt to hijack South Pacific island nations and manufacture a regional security crisis out of China’s normal missile tests. China tested a missile into the high seas. China is not a subscriber to the Hague Code of Conduct and is therefore not bound by its notification mechanism. Yet China still issued navigation and airspace warnings and notified relevant states in advance. Meanwhile, the United States has conducted more than 300 ICBM tests and roughly 200 SLBM tests. Washington has given China advance notice only once — in November 2024, after China had first notified the US of its own September launch. And now Palau is behaving as though China owes it a permission slip to conduct a lawful military test in the Pacific. This is the most ironic part: Palau has fewer than 20,000 people and its government has convinced itself that the Pacific is its private backyard. The high seas are not Palauan territorial waters. You do not get to turn an entire ocean into your private security perimeter and then demand that another Pacific power ask your permission to operate in international waters. Palau has sovereignty over Palau. It does not have sovereignty over the Pacific. If China conducts a lawful test in the high seas, your displeasure does not magically create jurisdiction. China is a Pacific country too. The Pacific is not Palau’s private swimming pool, and it certainly is not an American-administered firing range where only Washington gets to normalize missile testing. If every Chinese test is going to trigger a regional morality play, then perhaps China simply has not tested often enough for everyone to get used to the fact that it is a Pacific military power. America tested hundreds of times and made it background noise. China conducts a rare public test and everyone suddenly discovers trauma. Maybe the problem is not the missile. Maybe the problem is that the monopoly is over.
0:30

China slaps down Palau’s malicious attempt to hijack South Pacific island nations and manufacture a regional security crisis out of China’s normal missile tests. China tested a missile into the high seas. China is not a subscriber to the Hague Code of Conduct and is therefore not bound by its notification mechanism. Yet China still issued navigation and airspace warnings and notified relevant states in advance. Meanwhile, the United States has conducted more than 300 ICBM tests and roughly 200 SLBM tests. Washington has given China advance notice only once — in November 2024, after China had first notified the US of its own September launch. And now Palau is behaving as though China owes it a permission slip to conduct a lawful military test in the Pacific. This is the most ironic part: Palau has fewer than 20,000 people and its government has convinced itself that the Pacific is its private backyard. The high seas are not Palauan territorial waters. You do not get to turn an entire ocean into your private security perimeter and then demand that another Pacific power ask your permission to operate in international waters. Palau has sovereignty over Palau. It does not have sovereignty over the Pacific. If China conducts a lawful test in the high seas, your displeasure does not magically create jurisdiction. China is a Pacific country too. The Pacific is not Palau’s private swimming pool, and it certainly is not an American-administered firing range where only Washington gets to normalize missile testing. If every Chinese test is going to trigger a regional morality play, then perhaps China simply has not tested often enough for everyone to get used to the fact that it is a Pacific military power. America tested hundreds of times and made it background noise. China conducts a rare public test and everyone suddenly discovers trauma. Maybe the problem is not the missile. Maybe the problem is that the monopoly is over.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

59,279 次观看 • 15 天前

China responded to Solomon Islands’ protest by saying the missile test was a routine military training activity by the Chinese military. It was not directed at any specific country or target. Relevant parties had been notified in advance. There was no need to overinterpret it. What’s interesting here is the timing. On July 7, Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele said he had strongly protested China’s missile test, saying: China is a good friend of Solomon Islands, but friends do not do this. We do not want anyone testing intercontinental ballistic missiles in the Pacific. Very touching. Now the timeline: On March 3, the U.S. fired a Minuteman III ICBM across 6,700 km into the Marshall Islands. Silence. On May 20, the U.S. fired another Minuteman III into the South Pacific. Silence again. Then China conducted one publicly notified missile test with a dummy warhead, consistent with international practice, and suddenly everyone became a guardian of Pacific peace. So the problem is not missiles in the Pacific. The problem is Chinese missiles in the Pacific. Maybe China has simply tested too little there. A few more routine launches, and the regional nerves will adapt.
0:36

China responded to Solomon Islands’ protest by saying the missile test was a routine military training activity by the Chinese military. It was not directed at any specific country or target. Relevant parties had been notified in advance. There was no need to overinterpret it. What’s interesting here is the timing. On July 7, Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele said he had strongly protested China’s missile test, saying: China is a good friend of Solomon Islands, but friends do not do this. We do not want anyone testing intercontinental ballistic missiles in the Pacific. Very touching. Now the timeline: On March 3, the U.S. fired a Minuteman III ICBM across 6,700 km into the Marshall Islands. Silence. On May 20, the U.S. fired another Minuteman III into the South Pacific. Silence again. Then China conducted one publicly notified missile test with a dummy warhead, consistent with international practice, and suddenly everyone became a guardian of Pacific peace. So the problem is not missiles in the Pacific. The problem is Chinese missiles in the Pacific. Maybe China has simply tested too little there. A few more routine launches, and the regional nerves will adapt.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

35,128 次观看 • 2 个月前

Beijing fires back with a brutal reality check after the U.S. blamed China for “late notice” on its missile test. The funniest part is that the United States actually thinks it has the moral standing to lecture China on missile tests. The U.S. is the only country that has ever used nuclear weapons. The U.S. has conducted more than 300 intercontinental ballistic missile tests in the Pacific Ocean over the years. It sits on the world’s largest and most advanced nuclear arsenal. It routinely launches strategic missile tests from nuclear submarines. But when China conducts one routine test, notified in advance and not aimed at any country, Washington suddenly becomes the priest of “standards.” The problem is not missile tests. The problem is that China is no longer asking permission to defend itself. Washington is used to being the only country allowed to point missiles at the world while calling it stability. So China tests one missile, and suddenly the arsonist wants to inspect the fire code.
1:32

Beijing fires back with a brutal reality check after the U.S. blamed China for “late notice” on its missile test. The funniest part is that the United States actually thinks it has the moral standing to lecture China on missile tests. The U.S. is the only country that has ever used nuclear weapons. The U.S. has conducted more than 300 intercontinental ballistic missile tests in the Pacific Ocean over the years. It sits on the world’s largest and most advanced nuclear arsenal. It routinely launches strategic missile tests from nuclear submarines. But when China conducts one routine test, notified in advance and not aimed at any country, Washington suddenly becomes the priest of “standards.” The problem is not missile tests. The problem is that China is no longer asking permission to defend itself. Washington is used to being the only country allowed to point missiles at the world while calling it stability. So China tests one missile, and suddenly the arsonist wants to inspect the fire code.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

72,694 次观看 • 2 个月前

🇨🇳 🇺🇸 China is preparing a “shocking” surprise for the United States in the near future in the Asia-Pacific region. The expensive U.S. aircraft carriers and other ships must face reality and accept that they will sooner or later sink to the bottom of the Pacific Ocean or the South China Sea when confronted by a squadron of Chinese attack drones.
0:44

🇨🇳 🇺🇸 China is preparing a “shocking” surprise for the United States in the near future in the Asia-Pacific region. The expensive U.S. aircraft carriers and other ships must face reality and accept that they will sooner or later sink to the bottom of the Pacific Ocean or the South China Sea when confronted by a squadron of Chinese attack drones.

Global Scope

294,594 次观看 • 6 个月前

Everyone thinks giving Taiwan to China is a concession. It's not. Taiwan blocks China from the Pacific. That's its only strategic value to America. But if China owns Taiwan — Taiwan now blocks Japan and South Korea from the Strait of Malacca. Suddenly Japan and South Korea have to stop China from taking Taiwan. At their own expense. Their own military. Their own risk. Trump just transferred the Taiwan problem from America to its allies. And in return China opens its financial markets. 1.4 billion people finance American debt. Giving Taiwan to China is not a concession. It is the trade of the century.
2:08

Everyone thinks giving Taiwan to China is a concession. It's not. Taiwan blocks China from the Pacific. That's its only strategic value to America. But if China owns Taiwan — Taiwan now blocks Japan and South Korea from the Strait of Malacca. Suddenly Japan and South Korea have to stop China from taking Taiwan. At their own expense. Their own military. Their own risk. Trump just transferred the Taiwan problem from America to its allies. And in return China opens its financial markets. 1.4 billion people finance American debt. Giving Taiwan to China is not a concession. It is the trade of the century.

Predictive History

35,275 次观看 • 4 个月前

Russia wants to dominate Europe. Iran wants to dominate the Middle East. China wants to dominate the Indo-Pacific and Sub-Saharan Africa. That world is not safe for the American people.
1:04

Russia wants to dominate Europe. Iran wants to dominate the Middle East. China wants to dominate the Indo-Pacific and Sub-Saharan Africa. That world is not safe for the American people.

John Kennedy

131,276 次观看 • 3 年前

China offers Pacific islands respect, not conditions, says ambassador What sets China apart from Western powers in the Pacific? For one thing, China is no newcomer. Li Minggang, China's ambassador to Vanuatu, points out that exchanges between the two peoples go back centuries. And the bilateral relationship has been based on theset interactions. In this video, Li explains how Beijing's approach is built on respecting independence and traditions, with no strings and no empty promises. For island nations like Vanuatu, the appeal is clear: partnership, not being told what to do.
1:20

China offers Pacific islands respect, not conditions, says ambassador What sets China apart from Western powers in the Pacific? For one thing, China is no newcomer. Li Minggang, China's ambassador to Vanuatu, points out that exchanges between the two peoples go back centuries. And the bilateral relationship has been based on theset interactions. In this video, Li explains how Beijing's approach is built on respecting independence and traditions, with no strings and no empty promises. For island nations like Vanuatu, the appeal is clear: partnership, not being told what to do.

China Says

438,551 次观看 • 7 个月前

Manila is not a “victim.” It is auditioning to become Asia’s Israel: small-state hysteria, Western sponsorship, constant provocation, permanent victim theater, and zero regard for the civilians it uses as props. The Philippines knows China will not behave like the United States. China will not bomb fishing boats and order “kill them all.” So Manila keeps pushing poor fishermen and small boats into confrontations, betting Filipino lives on Chinese restraint. The Marcos administration is not protecting the Philippines. It is renting the country out as a forward operating stage for America’s Asia-Pacific containment script. Japan claps because it wants Asia unstable. America claps because it wants another powder keg. That is why China is angry. Not because Manila is “small.” But because Manila is trying to import Middle East-style chaos into Asia. Asia does not need another powder keg. And China will not let the South China Sea become one.
1:45

Manila is not a “victim.” It is auditioning to become Asia’s Israel: small-state hysteria, Western sponsorship, constant provocation, permanent victim theater, and zero regard for the civilians it uses as props. The Philippines knows China will not behave like the United States. China will not bomb fishing boats and order “kill them all.” So Manila keeps pushing poor fishermen and small boats into confrontations, betting Filipino lives on Chinese restraint. The Marcos administration is not protecting the Philippines. It is renting the country out as a forward operating stage for America’s Asia-Pacific containment script. Japan claps because it wants Asia unstable. America claps because it wants another powder keg. That is why China is angry. Not because Manila is “small.” But because Manila is trying to import Middle East-style chaos into Asia. Asia does not need another powder keg. And China will not let the South China Sea become one.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

18,355 次观看 • 2 个月前

🇨🇳🇯🇵🇵🇭 China didn’t "send a message," it delivered a verdict. “The atrocities must be remembered. The blood debts must be repaid. The justice must be delivered for crimes.” This is no longer the anger of civilians, it is the cold, institutional memory of a nation that buried 35 million of its people under fascist steel. The Pacific War never truly ended. How could it? Fascist Japan never truly confessed. And every attempt to revive militarism isn’t a threat to China, it is Japan digging up the corpse of its own past. As for the Philippines: When a nation that was slaughtered, starved, and enslaved now bows to the descendants of the same fascist empire… that’s not “moving on.” That’s colonial trauma wearing a fresh flag. They say China’s diplomacy is “getting sharper.” No, China is simply done pretending that history is a metaphor, it is an invoice, and overdue debts get collected. Fascism is not “returning” to Asia. It never left Japan, and China is reminding the region why it will never rise again.
1:44

🇨🇳🇯🇵🇵🇭 China didn’t "send a message," it delivered a verdict. “The atrocities must be remembered. The blood debts must be repaid. The justice must be delivered for crimes.” This is no longer the anger of civilians, it is the cold, institutional memory of a nation that buried 35 million of its people under fascist steel. The Pacific War never truly ended. How could it? Fascist Japan never truly confessed. And every attempt to revive militarism isn’t a threat to China, it is Japan digging up the corpse of its own past. As for the Philippines: When a nation that was slaughtered, starved, and enslaved now bows to the descendants of the same fascist empire… that’s not “moving on.” That’s colonial trauma wearing a fresh flag. They say China’s diplomacy is “getting sharper.” No, China is simply done pretending that history is a metaphor, it is an invoice, and overdue debts get collected. Fascism is not “returning” to Asia. It never left Japan, and China is reminding the region why it will never rise again.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

76,662 次观看 • 8 个月前

Xi Jinping says, China Never Seeks Hegemony" Can there be any bigger lie than this? From South China Sea to South Pacific, from Arctic to Antarctica, Taiwan Strait, to South America, in pursuit of a hegemony, China is turning the entire world into a conflict zone!
0:51

Xi Jinping says, China Never Seeks Hegemony" Can there be any bigger lie than this? From South China Sea to South Pacific, from Arctic to Antarctica, Taiwan Strait, to South America, in pursuit of a hegemony, China is turning the entire world into a conflict zone!

Michael Turner

23,323 次观看 • 2 个月前

Bessent just admitted the quiet part: everyone else is afraid of U.S. sanctions, but China kept buying Iranian oil. That is what real support looks like. Not hashtags. Not empty “rules-based order” sermons. Not performative outrage from anti-China colonial pets. When Trump bombed Iran, blocked Hormuz, and tried to choke Tehran economically, they laughed and said China had lost its cheap oil. Then they mocked China for “not helping Iran.” But helping a country does not always mean sending troops. Sometimes it means keeping its economy breathing when Washington tries to suffocate it. China’s demand, industry, and payment networks gave Iran enough room to survive the pressure until America could no longer drag out a war it could not afford. And then Washington had to sign a ceasefire so humiliating that even MAGA called it surrender. China did not need to fire a missile. It bought oil. It kept trade alive. That is why sanctions did not become a death sentence. That is why empire hates China: because China does not ask permission to keep another country standing.
0:28

Bessent just admitted the quiet part: everyone else is afraid of U.S. sanctions, but China kept buying Iranian oil. That is what real support looks like. Not hashtags. Not empty “rules-based order” sermons. Not performative outrage from anti-China colonial pets. When Trump bombed Iran, blocked Hormuz, and tried to choke Tehran economically, they laughed and said China had lost its cheap oil. Then they mocked China for “not helping Iran.” But helping a country does not always mean sending troops. Sometimes it means keeping its economy breathing when Washington tries to suffocate it. China’s demand, industry, and payment networks gave Iran enough room to survive the pressure until America could no longer drag out a war it could not afford. And then Washington had to sign a ceasefire so humiliating that even MAGA called it surrender. China did not need to fire a missile. It bought oil. It kept trade alive. That is why sanctions did not become a death sentence. That is why empire hates China: because China does not ask permission to keep another country standing.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

11,546 次观看 • 2 个月前

“We threaten no one.” China’s reply to NATO’s accusations over normal Beijing-Moscow cooperation was simple. And it exposed the absurdity perfectly. A bloc that spent decades turning “defense” into invasions, bombings, regime change, occupation, and mass killing now calls China a “security concern.” China did not invade Europe. China did not bomb NATO. China did not loot European palaces, burn their gardens, or steal their civilizational treasures. Europe did that to China. Before NATO lectures Beijing, this North Atlantic bombing club should explain why it is crawling into the Asia-Pacific like a colonial ghost with new branding.
0:45

“We threaten no one.” China’s reply to NATO’s accusations over normal Beijing-Moscow cooperation was simple. And it exposed the absurdity perfectly. A bloc that spent decades turning “defense” into invasions, bombings, regime change, occupation, and mass killing now calls China a “security concern.” China did not invade Europe. China did not bomb NATO. China did not loot European palaces, burn their gardens, or steal their civilizational treasures. Europe did that to China. Before NATO lectures Beijing, this North Atlantic bombing club should explain why it is crawling into the Asia-Pacific like a colonial ghost with new branding.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

16,991 次观看 • 2 个月前

When asked whether China is a threat to the UK, Victor Gao responded unceremoniously that the UK is not qualified to consider China a threat. The strength of the two countries is no longer at the same level, and the UK should not overestimate its global influence… Lmao😂😂
1:25

When asked whether China is a threat to the UK, Victor Gao responded unceremoniously that the UK is not qualified to consider China a threat. The strength of the two countries is no longer at the same level, and the UK should not overestimate its global influence… Lmao😂😂

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

226,665 次观看 • 2 年前

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: "China🇨🇳 was supposed to develop in a way that is subservient to the United States🇺🇸 (they didn't)...now they have to be punished." China is a target for one reason and one reason only: China refused to develop its economy to resemble a colony of Washington. Instead it developed its economy to staggering heights with an alternative economic system, showing the world that American capitalism is not the only model for development left in the world after the collapse of Soviet communism. Additionally, and perhaps most importantly, China refused to bend the knee to Washington’s hegemonic diktats. The US would rather go to war with China rather than allow it to surpass it economically, and any country that doesn’t obey US diktats is viewed as an enemy.
1:16

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: "China🇨🇳 was supposed to develop in a way that is subservient to the United States🇺🇸 (they didn't)...now they have to be punished." China is a target for one reason and one reason only: China refused to develop its economy to resemble a colony of Washington. Instead it developed its economy to staggering heights with an alternative economic system, showing the world that American capitalism is not the only model for development left in the world after the collapse of Soviet communism. Additionally, and perhaps most importantly, China refused to bend the knee to Washington’s hegemonic diktats. The US would rather go to war with China rather than allow it to surpass it economically, and any country that doesn’t obey US diktats is viewed as an enemy.

Afshin Rattansi

380,783 次观看 • 11 个月前

China’s warning about Japan’s re-militarization is not just a warning to Tokyo. It is a warning to the entire region. Japan’s economy has fallen back to roughly its 1992 level in nominal dollar terms, while China has grown into the world’s second-largest economy. China’s military spending has long remained below 1.5% of GDP. Even if Japan pushes defense spending to 5% of its GDP, it still cannot match China’s scale, industrial capacity, military R&D, shipbuilding, missile production, or strategic depth. So let us be honest: Japan’s re-militarization is not a real military threat to China. Japan cannot fight China. The real danger is to the smaller countries that keep telling China to “move on” from history. Japan once invaded, occupied, burned, raped, enslaved, and massacred across Asia. China. Korea. The Philippines. Indonesia. Singapore. Malaysia. Vietnam. Myanmar. Cambodia. Laos. Half of Asia remembers what Imperial Japan did. Or at least it should. The reason Japan has behaved like a “peaceful country” after 1945 is not because Japanese militarism suddenly grew a conscience. It is because the postwar order pulled out the beast’s fangs. And because China became too strong to be swallowed again. Now, as the U.S.-led order weakens, Japan’s Neo-fascist forces are testing the cage. They call it “defense.” They call it “counterstrike capability.” They call it “normalization.” But Asia has heard these words before. Japan has always known how to dress aggression in polite language. Today Japan does not dare confront China directly. So it provokes China, hides behind Washington, cries about Chinese “bullying,” and performs weakness for the Western press. That theater creates a useful illusion: Japan is peaceful. China is aggressive. But the real historical danger is not that Japan will defeat China. It is that Japan will once again turn its militarism toward countries that cannot fight back. And here is the part those countries should understand: China will not sacrifice Chinese soldiers to protect client states that choose the “Indo-Pacific” containment camp and help Tokyo and Washington pressure China. The Chinese people would not allow it. If some countries believe they can cut themselves off from China, stand with Japan, erase history, and become “higher-class Asians” under the U.S. umbrella, then they should prepare to live with the consequences. Japan was restrained by defeat. Not by remorse. And when the leash loosens, the first victims are rarely the strong.
1:45

China’s warning about Japan’s re-militarization is not just a warning to Tokyo. It is a warning to the entire region. Japan’s economy has fallen back to roughly its 1992 level in nominal dollar terms, while China has grown into the world’s second-largest economy. China’s military spending has long remained below 1.5% of GDP. Even if Japan pushes defense spending to 5% of its GDP, it still cannot match China’s scale, industrial capacity, military R&D, shipbuilding, missile production, or strategic depth. So let us be honest: Japan’s re-militarization is not a real military threat to China. Japan cannot fight China. The real danger is to the smaller countries that keep telling China to “move on” from history. Japan once invaded, occupied, burned, raped, enslaved, and massacred across Asia. China. Korea. The Philippines. Indonesia. Singapore. Malaysia. Vietnam. Myanmar. Cambodia. Laos. Half of Asia remembers what Imperial Japan did. Or at least it should. The reason Japan has behaved like a “peaceful country” after 1945 is not because Japanese militarism suddenly grew a conscience. It is because the postwar order pulled out the beast’s fangs. And because China became too strong to be swallowed again. Now, as the U.S.-led order weakens, Japan’s Neo-fascist forces are testing the cage. They call it “defense.” They call it “counterstrike capability.” They call it “normalization.” But Asia has heard these words before. Japan has always known how to dress aggression in polite language. Today Japan does not dare confront China directly. So it provokes China, hides behind Washington, cries about Chinese “bullying,” and performs weakness for the Western press. That theater creates a useful illusion: Japan is peaceful. China is aggressive. But the real historical danger is not that Japan will defeat China. It is that Japan will once again turn its militarism toward countries that cannot fight back. And here is the part those countries should understand: China will not sacrifice Chinese soldiers to protect client states that choose the “Indo-Pacific” containment camp and help Tokyo and Washington pressure China. The Chinese people would not allow it. If some countries believe they can cut themselves off from China, stand with Japan, erase history, and become “higher-class Asians” under the U.S. umbrella, then they should prepare to live with the consequences. Japan was restrained by defeat. Not by remorse. And when the leash loosens, the first victims are rarely the strong.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

29,354 次观看 • 3 个月前