Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Ben Affleck breaks down exactly why Hollywood is dying and the math is brutal. It costs a minimum of $25 million just to shoot a movie today with any A-list stars, no massive action sequences just 40 to 50 days of standard production. Then you spend another $25 million... to market it, which puts you at $50 million before a single ticket is sold. From there, theaters take 50% of every dollar at the box office so if your movie grosses $100 million, you walk away with $50 million , the exact amount you already spent making and marketing it. Which means a $25 million movie has to gross $100 million at the box office just to get back to zero. And most movies don't come close. The 2025 domestic box office hit $8.9 billion which sounds okay until you realize it's still down more than 20% from pre-pandemic levels, with the average wide release earning 14% less than it did the year before. So what happens when the math stops working? Studios stop taking risks. "When things are more expensive, people get risk averse. And when they're risk averse, they do the same shit. That's how you get the safe, homogenized stuff. And so it's a vicious cycle." The second thing killing it is streaming, people see the trailer, think it looks good, and decide to wait for it to hit Netflix. The only movies that survive the math are the ones audiences refuse to wait for which is why every theater slate looks like a Marvel calendar and why even Ryan Coogler making a Creed film with Michael B. Jordan is still considered a risk because it's not a sequel to a sequel. The system doesn't reward creativity but rather punishes it.show more

StockMarket.News

88,310 subscribers

217,500 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Искусство Новости и политика Финансы

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Ben Affleck breaks down why a $25M movie has to make $100M just to break even Affleck: "It's very, very difficult to make a movie for less than $25 million" "You spend about the same amount to advertise the movie as you spend to make it. So you spent $25 million to make it, $25 million to advertise it now you've got $50 million into the movie" "From the theaters you get back roughly 50%. So if a movie makes $100 million, you get back $50 million. You've got to gross a hundred million just in simple math" "People now go, 'this movie looks good, but I'll see it when it comes on streaming'"

Ben Affleck breaks down why a $25M movie has to make $100M just to break even Affleck: "It's very, very difficult to make a movie for less than $25 million" "You spend about the same amount to advertise the movie as you spend to make it. So you spent $25 million to make it, $25 million to advertise it now you've got $50 million into the movie" "From the theaters you get back roughly 50%. So if a movie makes $100 million, you get back $50 million. You've got to gross a hundred million just in simple math" "People now go, 'this movie looks good, but I'll see it when it comes on streaming'"

Arslan

3,529,536 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Ben Affleck says making a theatrical movie is far more expensive than most people realize. “Even without paying a huge movie star, it’s very difficult to make a film for less than $25 million today.” “And that number can climb fast once you add action scenes, stunts, or visual effects.” “What most people don’t realize is that you often spend about as much marketing the movie as you do making it.” “If the movie costs $25 million to make, you might spend another $25 million promoting it.” “Now you’re $50 million into the project.” “And theaters only send back about 50% of the box office.” “So if your movie grosses $100 million, you’re basically breaking even.”

Ben Affleck says making a theatrical movie is far more expensive than most people realize. “Even without paying a huge movie star, it’s very difficult to make a film for less than $25 million today.” “And that number can climb fast once you add action scenes, stunts, or visual effects.” “What most people don’t realize is that you often spend about as much marketing the movie as you do making it.” “If the movie costs $25 million to make, you might spend another $25 million promoting it.” “Now you’re $50 million into the project.” “And theaters only send back about 50% of the box office.” “So if your movie grosses $100 million, you’re basically breaking even.”

KΞRL_✂️

145,291 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

traditional marketing is dying and Obsession (the 2026 movie) is one of the biggest examples of it the movie has made $225 million in 2 weeks of launching and it only costed $750,000 to make thats a 300x return on production budget while a Star Wars movie came out a week after and it costed $166,000,000, more than 220x than obsession and it's struggling to make a 1x return on production budget the difference between these 2 movies is that obsession was incredibly clippable the clips of that movie are literally trending TikTok audios people clipped obsession and made it go viral all over social media they didn't need a $50 million marketing budget or interviews, or a press release just teenagers on their phone with capcut and tiktok made this movie $225 million in 2 weeks that's what happens when you're culturally relevant people's social media feeds are the culture when you run an ad or pay for a partnership it's not a part of the culture, it's an interruption and people despise that when you do clipping for your brand, product, or movie, it blends into the feed it's one with the culture people move with the culture, they share it, they react to it, and they build trends around it the reason people are rushing to go and watch Obsession is because they keep seeing it on their fyp 20 times a day it naturally builds curiosity and fomo and they don't want to miss out clipping blends you into the culture and when you become one with the trends that's when your costs will literally go down 300x and your ROI will go up 1000x this is what we see on Content Rewards every single day with our campaigns where our CPMs get as low as $0.30 to even $0.09 and we see numbers like 400 million views w/ only $100,000 in spend if you also want to see results like that, DM me and I'll help you

Alex

11,671 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Arnold Schwarzenegger reveals the Twins made him $15M more profits than any Terminator movie "You earn more from Twins than any of the Terminator movies because Twins was a $15 million film...you got 20% of the profits" "It was Ivan Wrightman, Danny, and myself...We split 37.5% and my share was like you said the 20% of it...We went to Universal Studio and said I want no money" "You take the risk with comedy and I am more than happy to take that risk...in the end it was not just what it made at the box office but then it was sold to TV and then for videos and TV deals"

Arnold Schwarzenegger reveals the Twins made him $15M more profits than any Terminator movie "You earn more from Twins than any of the Terminator movies because Twins was a $15 million film...you got 20% of the profits" "It was Ivan Wrightman, Danny, and myself...We split 37.5% and my share was like you said the 20% of it...We went to Universal Studio and said I want no money" "You take the risk with comedy and I am more than happy to take that risk...in the end it was not just what it made at the box office but then it was sold to TV and then for videos and TV deals"

CreativeDude

537,847 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I know it's already been said, but if you like Vikings and care about European history, you NEED to watch The Northman from 2022. It only made 75.8 million at the box office with a budget of 70 million. It's a crime that it didn't do better.

I know it's already been said, but if you like Vikings and care about European history, you NEED to watch The Northman from 2022. It only made 75.8 million at the box office with a budget of 70 million. It's a crime that it didn't do better.

Nathaniel Graves

443,382 просмотров • 6 дней назад

Warren Buffett: "Finance departments teach that volatility equals risk. They want to measure risk and they don't know how to do it, so they say that volatility measures risk." "I've often used the example of The Washington Post stock, when we first bought it in 1973, had gone down almost 50% from a valuation of the whole company of ~$175 million down to maybe $80-90 million. Because it happened very fast, the beta of the stock had actually increased — and a professor would have told you that the company was more risky if you bought it for $80 million than if you bought it for $170 million. Which is something that I've thought about ever since they told me that 25 years ago — and I still haven't figured it out." (Berkshire Hathaway AGM || 1997)

Warren Buffett: "Finance departments teach that volatility equals risk. They want to measure risk and they don't know how to do it, so they say that volatility measures risk." "I've often used the example of The Washington Post stock, when we first bought it in 1973, had gone down almost 50% from a valuation of the whole company of ~$175 million down to maybe $80-90 million. Because it happened very fast, the beta of the stock had actually increased — and a professor would have told you that the company was more risky if you bought it for $80 million than if you bought it for $170 million. Which is something that I've thought about ever since they told me that 25 years ago — and I still haven't figured it out." (Berkshire Hathaway AGM || 1997)

Kevin Carpenter

37,341 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Jeremy has a unique lens on how to underwrite new investment managers. He looks at whether the manager is looking up or looking down at the size of their own fund: "People overweight the investing thesis and track record and underweight the facts about the person. The personal financial situation of a manager is an incredibly underrated thing to ask about. Someone who has a million dollars in the bank, raising $100M to do a thing that they're trying to make the most money from -- that's a very different place to start from. Take two $50 million funds. One is from someone who has 500 grand in the bank and one is from someone who has $500 million in the bank. For the $500 million person, the $50 million fund might very well do better because it's held with a looser grip. You're gonna be less paralyzed by the sheer quantities of dollars. That is generally not recognized, and you see it all the time in new ventures. If you are helming something that is two or three zeros more than you have, there's just a monumental to it that is a bit intimidating...versus when you're taking bets that are negligible to you."

Jeremy has a unique lens on how to underwrite new investment managers. He looks at whether the manager is looking up or looking down at the size of their own fund: "People overweight the investing thesis and track record and underweight the facts about the person. The personal financial situation of a manager is an incredibly underrated thing to ask about. Someone who has a million dollars in the bank, raising $100M to do a thing that they're trying to make the most money from -- that's a very different place to start from. Take two $50 million funds. One is from someone who has 500 grand in the bank and one is from someone who has $500 million in the bank. For the $500 million person, the $50 million fund might very well do better because it's held with a looser grip. You're gonna be less paralyzed by the sheer quantities of dollars. That is generally not recognized, and you see it all the time in new ventures. If you are helming something that is two or three zeros more than you have, there's just a monumental to it that is a bit intimidating...versus when you're taking bets that are negligible to you."

Patrick OShaughnessy

80,785 просмотров • 15 дней назад

Ryan Leaf says he made $15,000,000 from his $31,000,000 NFL rookie contract before losing it all “The headline says $31 million. The signing bonus was $11 million, which is still a lot of damn money. Three years in the contract was lower salaries” “I probably made $15 million out of all that. $7.5 million went to taxes. $3.8 million went to the ex-wife” “So I have $3.8 million, and I lived like I was still making $5 million a year. Had the big house, flew on private planes” “I just figured that the money would never run out. Didn't fully understand what that looked like, and before you know it, it's gone” “When you were making zero dollars a year, and you live like you're still making $5 million a year, it goes away. It was gone”

Ryan Leaf says he made $15,000,000 from his $31,000,000 NFL rookie contract before losing it all “The headline says $31 million. The signing bonus was $11 million, which is still a lot of damn money. Three years in the contract was lower salaries” “I probably made $15 million out of all that. $7.5 million went to taxes. $3.8 million went to the ex-wife” “So I have $3.8 million, and I lived like I was still making $5 million a year. Had the big house, flew on private planes” “I just figured that the money would never run out. Didn't fully understand what that looked like, and before you know it, it's gone” “When you were making zero dollars a year, and you live like you're still making $5 million a year, it goes away. It was gone”

dank

719,838 просмотров • 12 дней назад

a horror movie made for $750,000 is about to become one of the most profitable films ever made. Obsession - shot in 20 days in Alabama by a 26-year-old YouTuber with no stars in the cast - is now eyeing a $250 million+ box office finish. that's a return north of 300 times its budget. it's already the highest-grossing release in Focus Features history. now look at what the industry spent that same money on: - Joker: Folie a Deux - ~$200 million budget. a punchline. - Mickey 17 - ~$118 million. forgotten in a month. - The Mandalorian & Grogu - $165 million, 7 years, the entire Lucasfilm machine. it's currently losing the weekday box office to... Obsession. Hollywood keeps insisting you need $200 million, a pre-sold IP, and a marketing budget the size of a small country to make a hit. then a guy with a camera, a wish-granting toy, and three weeks in Alabama outearned all of them on a rounding error of their catering bill. the most profitable movie of the year cost less than a single second of screen time in the average blockbuster. turns out audiences never wanted the budget. they wanted a good movie.

a horror movie made for $750,000 is about to become one of the most profitable films ever made. Obsession - shot in 20 days in Alabama by a 26-year-old YouTuber with no stars in the cast - is now eyeing a $250 million+ box office finish. that's a return north of 300 times its budget. it's already the highest-grossing release in Focus Features history. now look at what the industry spent that same money on: - Joker: Folie a Deux - ~$200 million budget. a punchline. - Mickey 17 - ~$118 million. forgotten in a month. - The Mandalorian & Grogu - $165 million, 7 years, the entire Lucasfilm machine. it's currently losing the weekday box office to... Obsession. Hollywood keeps insisting you need $200 million, a pre-sold IP, and a marketing budget the size of a small country to make a hit. then a guy with a camera, a wish-granting toy, and three weeks in Alabama outearned all of them on a rounding error of their catering bill. the most profitable movie of the year cost less than a single second of screen time in the average blockbuster. turns out audiences never wanted the budget. they wanted a good movie.

frostzy

4,345,912 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Elon Musk just told you why caution kills more companies than risk ever has. Musk: “One of the approaches we did take was to proceed at risk with temporary permits.” Hundreds of millions in concrete before the final signature exists. Knowing the full downside. Musk: “Your long-term permit could be denied, in which case you have to stop everything.” Tear it all down. Back to dirt. Every board on Earth calls that unacceptable. Musk calls it cheaper than the alternative. Musk: “Most companies are not willing to take the risk of the temporary permit, and then the risk of having to stop and tear down.” They think they are avoiding risk. They are selecting one. Waiting is not neutral. Waiting is a position. A bet that the market holds, the team stays, and momentum outlasts a system designed to outlast you. It never does. No one says no. The calendar says it for them. Not rejection. Erosion. Musk saw it for what it was. He chose the risk you can see over the risk you cannot. Gigafactories rose in months while the rest of the industry waited on the meeting about the permit. The gap was never resources. It was the willingness to see that waiting is not free. It is the most expensive decision in business. Because it is the only one nobody knows they are making.

Elon Musk just told you why caution kills more companies than risk ever has. Musk: “One of the approaches we did take was to proceed at risk with temporary permits.” Hundreds of millions in concrete before the final signature exists. Knowing the full downside. Musk: “Your long-term permit could be denied, in which case you have to stop everything.” Tear it all down. Back to dirt. Every board on Earth calls that unacceptable. Musk calls it cheaper than the alternative. Musk: “Most companies are not willing to take the risk of the temporary permit, and then the risk of having to stop and tear down.” They think they are avoiding risk. They are selecting one. Waiting is not neutral. Waiting is a position. A bet that the market holds, the team stays, and momentum outlasts a system designed to outlast you. It never does. No one says no. The calendar says it for them. Not rejection. Erosion. Musk saw it for what it was. He chose the risk you can see over the risk you cannot. Gigafactories rose in months while the rest of the industry waited on the meeting about the permit. The gap was never resources. It was the willingness to see that waiting is not free. It is the most expensive decision in business. Because it is the only one nobody knows they are making.

Dustin

18,985 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Dave Ramsey breaks down how saving only $100 a month can make you a millionaire by 65 "Be on a detailed plan, be in agreement with your spouse, and get out of debt" "$100 a month saved at 12%, the s&p's average 11.6, 11.8 depending on how many years you go back, $100 a month from 25 to 65 is $1.176 million" "a million is not what it used to be, but a 100 is not what it used to be either, it's so doable"

Dave Ramsey breaks down how saving only $100 a month can make you a millionaire by 65 "Be on a detailed plan, be in agreement with your spouse, and get out of debt" "$100 a month saved at 12%, the s&p's average 11.6, 11.8 depending on how many years you go back, $100 a month from 25 to 65 is $1.176 million" "a million is not what it used to be, but a 100 is not what it used to be either, it's so doable"

Yonan

108,905 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Elon Musk: We've mostly fixed the bug which would give you way too much of something if you interacted with a particular subject matter. And then the really big change which is where Grok literally reads everything that's posted to the platform Which actually there's about 100 million posts per day. So it's 100 million pieces of content per day. And I think that's actually just maybe just in English. I think it goes beyond that if it's outside of English. So Grok is going to we're going to start off reading the really what Grok thinks are the top 10 million of the 100 million and we'll actually read them and understand them and categorize them and match them to users This is not a job humans could ever do. And then once that is scaling we'll add the entire 100 million a day. So it's literally going to read through 100 million things and show you the things that it thinks out of 100 million posts per day, what are the most interesting posts to you? Interviewer: How much of Colossus will that take? Like... lot of work. Yeah, that's like is it tens of thousands of servers like to do that every day? Elon Musk: Yeah, my guess is it's probably on the order of 50k H100s, something like that Interviewer: Wow. And that will replace search, so you'll be able to actually search on Twitter and find things in like with a with a plain language... Elon Musk: We'll have semantic search where you can just ask a question and it will show you all content whether that is text, pictures, or video that matches your search query semantically

Elon Musk: We've mostly fixed the bug which would give you way too much of something if you interacted with a particular subject matter. And then the really big change which is where Grok literally reads everything that's posted to the platform Which actually there's about 100 million posts per day. So it's 100 million pieces of content per day. And I think that's actually just maybe just in English. I think it goes beyond that if it's outside of English. So Grok is going to we're going to start off reading the really what Grok thinks are the top 10 million of the 100 million and we'll actually read them and understand them and categorize them and match them to users This is not a job humans could ever do. And then once that is scaling we'll add the entire 100 million a day. So it's literally going to read through 100 million things and show you the things that it thinks out of 100 million posts per day, what are the most interesting posts to you? Interviewer: How much of Colossus will that take? Like... lot of work. Yeah, that's like is it tens of thousands of servers like to do that every day? Elon Musk: Yeah, my guess is it's probably on the order of 50k H100s, something like that Interviewer: Wow. And that will replace search, so you'll be able to actually search on Twitter and find things in like with a with a plain language... Elon Musk: We'll have semantic search where you can just ask a question and it will show you all content whether that is text, pictures, or video that matches your search query semantically

X Freeze

89,232 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Arteta: “To be fair, it's a bit different when you finish second and when you win it with your phone, and that's a sport and it's a big lesson in life as well because the margins are so small and it can go either way. “When you just accomplish it, you realise, yeah, how immense it is, how big it is for so many people. I mean, just to witness the happiness and the enjoyment, all the things that I've seen from all of our supporters, families in different countries, it's just so good.”

Arteta: “To be fair, it's a bit different when you finish second and when you win it with your phone, and that's a sport and it's a big lesson in life as well because the margins are so small and it can go either way. “When you just accomplish it, you realise, yeah, how immense it is, how big it is for so many people. I mean, just to witness the happiness and the enjoyment, all the things that I've seen from all of our supporters, families in different countries, it's just so good.”

Connor Humm

39,215 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Marcus Morris says the NBA middle class is disappearing because of $50,000,000 contracts Adam: “The Devin Booker one stuck out to me because the math was, he's making $880,000 a game. Is it still staggering to see these numbers and where it's gotten to?” Marcus: “I wish they could disperse it out a little bit better than what that is. You'll see teams like OKC, where you're going to have three players making $50 million, but it's more players on the team that's giving stuff to help you win. You're going to see that, then the big drop off of $8 million, $7 million, $3 million. In that aspect, I think it should be more mixed” Adam: “The upper tier guys are always going to get paid, but it does seem with the luxury tax and aprons, the middle class is no longer there. Because if you're going to have some big name guys, the rest of your roster needs to be low end contracts. Then when someone gets to that next level, there's no middle ground”

Marcus Morris says the NBA middle class is disappearing because of $50,000,000 contracts Adam: “The Devin Booker one stuck out to me because the math was, he's making $880,000 a game. Is it still staggering to see these numbers and where it's gotten to?” Marcus: “I wish they could disperse it out a little bit better than what that is. You'll see teams like OKC, where you're going to have three players making $50 million, but it's more players on the team that's giving stuff to help you win. You're going to see that, then the big drop off of $8 million, $7 million, $3 million. In that aspect, I think it should be more mixed” Adam: “The upper tier guys are always going to get paid, but it does seem with the luxury tax and aprons, the middle class is no longer there. Because if you're going to have some big name guys, the rest of your roster needs to be low end contracts. Then when someone gets to that next level, there's no middle ground”

dank

312,791 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Curtis Yarvin on how "the Left" has executed population replacement in the White Dominions as a "stalk and charge." "This is a predator... [and] they're starting to speed run...mass immigration is not 2 million people entering the US a year...[it's] 10... to 100 million a year" This clip of Yarvin (Curtis Yarvin), a political blogger and software developer (according to Wikipedia), is taken from a conversation with Peter McCormack (Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪) posted to McCormack's eponymous YouTube channel on February 23, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "You might think that people getting red-pilled in various ways is something that would really put a stop to this craziness of population replacement. Oh, no, actually it's quite very much the reverse. "Because there's something anyone who's totally lost faith in the Left, in a way, they have many complaints with the Left. But it all boils down to, you basically recognize that this is not a vegetarian thing. This is a predator, right? "And so this is a predator. And so when a predator such as a lion is hunting, there are basically two phases of the pursuit. There's the stalk and the charge. And the stalk is like, well, nobody really knows what's going on here. Like, let's take the demographic replacement in the U.S. It's from the, you know, the 1965 Immigration Act. And politicians swore up and down that this was not what it, what it was. Basically, since that act, basically it's brought like 100 million people from the third world into the US, right? "Something like that. Solid, solid numbers like that. And, but in order to sort of do that, you know, you couldn't have this giant boat lift where, you know, some gigantic version of the Empire Windrush brought 100 million people at the same time. It's more a case of like, you know, slowly, slowly, catchy, catchy fish, right? You know, where you're kind of tickling it and you're like, oh yeah, oh yeah, our friends from, you know, we're open, our hearts are welcoming, right? "You know, like all of this, like, you know, stuff that's just of course, unbelievably sinister because it's sort of trading on people's goodwill and people's good wishes. It's like this con. But the thing is, when people, when enough people see the con, and all of these systems are incentive-based, they're not based on planning, the Left is not run by some cabal. It's incentives that drive things. "What you're seeing, especially in what used to be called the white dominions, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, especially is you're seeing they're starting to speed run, they're starting to come out of their crouch and basically just be like, yeah, actually we're, I mean in the 21st century, I think they've increased the population of Canada by like 35%. Right? "And so even that is small. Even that is small. The Spanish government was just like, we're going to legalize 500,000. Oh, but that's just an estimate. That's just an estimate of how many people that plan will suck in it probably will be more like over a million. Right. "And so you know and those people are Schengen. They can go anywhere in Europe and you will see them do that and the like and and so what you could see in the US if basically the next time Democrats win the presidency people go on about like mass immigration. Like no, we've not seen mass immigration. You have no idea what mass immigration is. "Mass Immigration is not 2 million people entering the US a year. Mass immigration starts I I would call it mass until it was like 10 a year. And like mass immigration is really the 10 to 50 to 100 million a year. But that's what could spark civil war. No, no— I don't know I'm seeing it here. No because people have no balls. People have no balls—"

Curtis Yarvin on how "the Left" has executed population replacement in the White Dominions as a "stalk and charge." "This is a predator... [and] they're starting to speed run...mass immigration is not 2 million people entering the US a year...[it's] 10... to 100 million a year" This clip of Yarvin (Curtis Yarvin), a political blogger and software developer (according to Wikipedia), is taken from a conversation with Peter McCormack (Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪) posted to McCormack's eponymous YouTube channel on February 23, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "You might think that people getting red-pilled in various ways is something that would really put a stop to this craziness of population replacement. Oh, no, actually it's quite very much the reverse. "Because there's something anyone who's totally lost faith in the Left, in a way, they have many complaints with the Left. But it all boils down to, you basically recognize that this is not a vegetarian thing. This is a predator, right? "And so this is a predator. And so when a predator such as a lion is hunting, there are basically two phases of the pursuit. There's the stalk and the charge. And the stalk is like, well, nobody really knows what's going on here. Like, let's take the demographic replacement in the U.S. It's from the, you know, the 1965 Immigration Act. And politicians swore up and down that this was not what it, what it was. Basically, since that act, basically it's brought like 100 million people from the third world into the US, right? "Something like that. Solid, solid numbers like that. And, but in order to sort of do that, you know, you couldn't have this giant boat lift where, you know, some gigantic version of the Empire Windrush brought 100 million people at the same time. It's more a case of like, you know, slowly, slowly, catchy, catchy fish, right? You know, where you're kind of tickling it and you're like, oh yeah, oh yeah, our friends from, you know, we're open, our hearts are welcoming, right? "You know, like all of this, like, you know, stuff that's just of course, unbelievably sinister because it's sort of trading on people's goodwill and people's good wishes. It's like this con. But the thing is, when people, when enough people see the con, and all of these systems are incentive-based, they're not based on planning, the Left is not run by some cabal. It's incentives that drive things. "What you're seeing, especially in what used to be called the white dominions, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, especially is you're seeing they're starting to speed run, they're starting to come out of their crouch and basically just be like, yeah, actually we're, I mean in the 21st century, I think they've increased the population of Canada by like 35%. Right? "And so even that is small. Even that is small. The Spanish government was just like, we're going to legalize 500,000. Oh, but that's just an estimate. That's just an estimate of how many people that plan will suck in it probably will be more like over a million. Right. "And so you know and those people are Schengen. They can go anywhere in Europe and you will see them do that and the like and and so what you could see in the US if basically the next time Democrats win the presidency people go on about like mass immigration. Like no, we've not seen mass immigration. You have no idea what mass immigration is. "Mass Immigration is not 2 million people entering the US a year. Mass immigration starts I I would call it mass until it was like 10 a year. And like mass immigration is really the 10 to 50 to 100 million a year. But that's what could spark civil war. No, no— I don't know I'm seeing it here. No because people have no balls. People have no balls—"

Sense Receptor

245,834 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Elon Musk: Any country that allows unfettered mass immigration will cease to exist. “The mass immigration is insane and will lead to the destruction of any country that allows unfettered mass immigration. That country will simply cease to exist. At the end of the day, it is a numbers game, a numbers situation. If there are 8 billion people in the world, and let's say you're a country of 50 million, 60 million, for a medium-sized country, but even for a country like the United States, which is 350 million, given that there are 8 billion people in the world, it only takes a few percent of the rest of the world to move to the country to where it is no longer that country. A country is not its geography. A country is its people. This is a fundamental concept that is truly obvious. If you took the people of Italy and you teleported the people of Italy to, say, some part of the United States, it would still be Italy. But if you teleported a bunch of people from some other part of the world to Italy, where the Italian people are no longer because they've been teleported to America, then the region, the geographic region, would no longer be Italy. It would be that other country.” From: Interview with Matteo Salvini, April 5, 2025

Elon Musk: Any country that allows unfettered mass immigration will cease to exist. “The mass immigration is insane and will lead to the destruction of any country that allows unfettered mass immigration. That country will simply cease to exist. At the end of the day, it is a numbers game, a numbers situation. If there are 8 billion people in the world, and let's say you're a country of 50 million, 60 million, for a medium-sized country, but even for a country like the United States, which is 350 million, given that there are 8 billion people in the world, it only takes a few percent of the rest of the world to move to the country to where it is no longer that country. A country is not its geography. A country is its people. This is a fundamental concept that is truly obvious. If you took the people of Italy and you teleported the people of Italy to, say, some part of the United States, it would still be Italy. But if you teleported a bunch of people from some other part of the world to Italy, where the Italian people are no longer because they've been teleported to America, then the region, the geographic region, would no longer be Italy. It would be that other country.” From: Interview with Matteo Salvini, April 5, 2025

ELON CLIPS

27,107 просмотров • 1 год назад

"It's a superhero movie that is for adults and has adult ideas in it. You don't have to think about it any harder than that. It goes way deeper. If you want to, you can tear it apart like a giant onion and keep peeling it until you're at its core. "But I think that it's cool to experience it just like when I read the comic book for the first time and I didn't know. No one was telling me what it's about or the why of it. You come to it fresh. And sometimes I wish I had that experience because I would love to see the movie or read the book for the first time again because that feeling was for me awesome. "Especially when you go into something with this anticipation that it's just a Hollywood superhero movie which is what a lot of people will think because they don't know. They see some guys fighting and then when you see the film you actually have this experience of it being taken apart. "Those archetypes, those mythological shapes, whether they be Batman or Superman or any of superheroes and how they're just turned around. Whether it's through sexual fetish or fighting, actually killing guys they fight. "Stuff like that or whether it's the end of the movie and there's this moral dilemma that is the end of the movie is also challenging on all those levels."

"It's a superhero movie that is for adults and has adult ideas in it. You don't have to think about it any harder than that. It goes way deeper. If you want to, you can tear it apart like a giant onion and keep peeling it until you're at its core. "But I think that it's cool to experience it just like when I read the comic book for the first time and I didn't know. No one was telling me what it's about or the why of it. You come to it fresh. And sometimes I wish I had that experience because I would love to see the movie or read the book for the first time again because that feeling was for me awesome. "Especially when you go into something with this anticipation that it's just a Hollywood superhero movie which is what a lot of people will think because they don't know. They see some guys fighting and then when you see the film you actually have this experience of it being taken apart. "Those archetypes, those mythological shapes, whether they be Batman or Superman or any of superheroes and how they're just turned around. Whether it's through sexual fetish or fighting, actually killing guys they fight. "Stuff like that or whether it's the end of the movie and there's this moral dilemma that is the end of the movie is also challenging on all those levels."

Zack Snyder Film

22,225 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

HOLLYWOOD JUST LOST TO YOUTUBE This weekend three movies made by YouTube creators landed in the domestic top 5 at the same time. None of them came from a studio pipeline. All of them came from the internet. - Obsession cost $750,000 and is passing $150 million domestic to become Focus Features' biggest film ever - Backrooms cost $10 million and has already hit $134 million domestic as A24's biggest film ever - Masters of the Universe cost a reported $200 million and opened to just $31 million - Obsession and Backrooms combined cost less than the catering on most blockbusters The barrier between a webcam and the box office just stopped existing.

HOLLYWOOD JUST LOST TO YOUTUBE This weekend three movies made by YouTube creators landed in the domestic top 5 at the same time. None of them came from a studio pipeline. All of them came from the internet. - Obsession cost $750,000 and is passing $150 million domestic to become Focus Features' biggest film ever - Backrooms cost $10 million and has already hit $134 million domestic as A24's biggest film ever - Masters of the Universe cost a reported $200 million and opened to just $31 million - Obsession and Backrooms combined cost less than the catering on most blockbusters The barrier between a webcam and the box office just stopped existing.

BuBBliK

1,020,723 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

You win a $4 million jackpot at 18, and suddenly it's "the system's" fault when you go broke? Please. He didn't lose his money because the lottery is a curse. He lost it because instead of taking accountability, learning how the financial system works, and hiring an advisor, he blew every single penny. Now he’s a maintenance tech budgeting to the cent for groceries. If you get handed massive wealth, it is 100% your responsibility to protect it. Would you take the time to learn the system, or would you blow it all too?

You win a $4 million jackpot at 18, and suddenly it's "the system's" fault when you go broke? Please. He didn't lose his money because the lottery is a curse. He lost it because instead of taking accountability, learning how the financial system works, and hiring an advisor, he blew every single penny. Now he’s a maintenance tech budgeting to the cent for groceries. If you get handed massive wealth, it is 100% your responsibility to protect it. Would you take the time to learn the system, or would you blow it all too?

Desiree

11,385 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад