Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Best DESIGN Resources for AI Coding, save this 👇 1. — 5-figure site prompts. 600+ 3D Websites, 500+ Animated gradients, motion sections. Everything's a prompt. 2. — every navbar pattern worth copying. 3. — footers that don't feel like an afterthought. 4. — call-to-actions that actually convert. 5. —... show more

Viktor Oddy

72,813 subscribers

126,015 просмотров • 10 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Образование Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

How I built with Claude 👇 1. Structure it as 6 individual 3D scenes per product 2. Design each scene as an intimate alcove with its own world 3. Use scroll to move between scenes 4. Add hidden gestures that reward curious users 5. Pair a custom soundscape to each environment 6. Let the 3D render carry the story 7. This is how luxury brands sell without selling 8. Save this if you want websites that feel like walking into a store 🏆

How I built with Claude 👇 1. Structure it as 6 individual 3D scenes per product 2. Design each scene as an intimate alcove with its own world 3. Use scroll to move between scenes 4. Add hidden gestures that reward curious users 5. Pair a custom soundscape to each environment 6. Let the 3D render carry the story 7. This is how luxury brands sell without selling 8. Save this if you want websites that feel like walking into a store 🏆

FHILY👑

75,220 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

HIGGSFIELD + FABLE 5 MADE A SITE THAT LOOKS LIKE A $35,000 STUDIO JOB FOR $12. NOBODY'S CLOCKED IT YET. the cheap giveaway of an AI-built site is always the same: stocky visuals, dead scroll, zero polish. this skips all three. what actually makes it read as $35k: → REAL MOTION, NOT STOCK the clips come from 30+ generative models, matched to your story - not the same three stock loops everyone's already seen. → SCROLL WITH WEIGHT GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis give it pacing and feel - pinned sections, scrubbed video, reveals that land. this is the thing that makes expensive sites feel expensive. → THE CINEMATIC LAYER film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints - baked in, no config. it's the polish agencies charge a designer for. → TASTE IS THE INPUT the AI executes; you direct. point real judgment at the stack and it ships premium. point lazy prompts at it and yeah - you get slop. that part's on you. CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: - mcp_servers: - higgsfield: - url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. THE MATH: → what a studio charges: $6,000-$35,000+ → what it costs you: a Claude sub + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → what it takes: 4 people + 3 weeks → 1 operator + 1 session the tools were never the bottleneck. taste was. now taste is the only input left. Follow me, reply "LAUNCH" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

HIGGSFIELD + FABLE 5 MADE A SITE THAT LOOKS LIKE A $35,000 STUDIO JOB FOR $12. NOBODY'S CLOCKED IT YET. the cheap giveaway of an AI-built site is always the same: stocky visuals, dead scroll, zero polish. this skips all three. what actually makes it read as $35k: → REAL MOTION, NOT STOCK the clips come from 30+ generative models, matched to your story - not the same three stock loops everyone's already seen. → SCROLL WITH WEIGHT GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis give it pacing and feel - pinned sections, scrubbed video, reveals that land. this is the thing that makes expensive sites feel expensive. → THE CINEMATIC LAYER film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints - baked in, no config. it's the polish agencies charge a designer for. → TASTE IS THE INPUT the AI executes; you direct. point real judgment at the stack and it ships premium. point lazy prompts at it and yeah - you get slop. that part's on you. CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: - mcp_servers: - higgsfield: - url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. THE MATH: → what a studio charges: $6,000-$35,000+ → what it costs you: a Claude sub + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → what it takes: 4 people + 3 weeks → 1 operator + 1 session the tools were never the bottleneck. taste was. now taste is the only input left. Follow me, reply "LAUNCH" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

ZEUS⚡️

80,782 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

GPT-4o static ads that ACTUALLY convert. I spent 7+ hrs on this 13 min video.👇 Get it now 1. Like + Comment GPT Ads 2. Connect with Aniruddha Mishra (Ani) 3. Repost for instant access Why? Because ChatGPT-generated ads are outperforming traditional creative. Here’s what you’ll find inside the video: 1. The exact research process I follow 2. The prompts I used (yes, copy-paste ready) 3. The frameworks that consistently drive results 4. The mistakes most people make - and how to avoid them This isn’t a fluff tutorial. It’s the exact process that’s working right now. Want better performing ads? This walkthrough might change the game for you. P.S. The video’s only 13 minutes. But it took me hours to make sure every minute was worth it.

GPT-4o static ads that ACTUALLY convert. I spent 7+ hrs on this 13 min video.👇 Get it now 1. Like + Comment GPT Ads 2. Connect with Aniruddha Mishra (Ani) 3. Repost for instant access Why? Because ChatGPT-generated ads are outperforming traditional creative. Here’s what you’ll find inside the video: 1. The exact research process I follow 2. The prompts I used (yes, copy-paste ready) 3. The frameworks that consistently drive results 4. The mistakes most people make - and how to avoid them This isn’t a fluff tutorial. It’s the exact process that’s working right now. Want better performing ads? This walkthrough might change the game for you. P.S. The video’s only 13 minutes. But it took me hours to make sure every minute was worth it.

Aniruddha Mishra (Ani)

44,465 просмотров • 1 год назад

Fable 5 just dropped and someone already built a $10k-looking website with it. Here's the full workflow The smooth scrolling, the animations, the transitions, all built with Fable 5. Here's how to get the same result instead of a generic template. 1. Steal a direction first. Go to Mobbin or Godly and find a site whose feel you love. Screenshot it. Fable copies a vibe far better than it invents one. 2. Grab real components. Pull animation-ready blocks from Aceternity UI or Magic UI. These are built for exactly this look (scroll reveals, parallax, gradients). 3. Prompt Fable with all of it. Switch to Fable 5 in Claude Code, drop in your screenshots and the component references, and describe the sections and scroll behavior you want. Let it plan before it builds. 4. Animate with the right tools. Tell it to use GSAP with ScrollTrigger for scroll effects, or Framer Motion for React. This is what separates "nice" from "$10k." 5. Iterate on feel, not code. Preview it, then give Fable specific notes ("slower fade, more spacing on mobile") until it lands. Bookmark this

Fable 5 just dropped and someone already built a $10k-looking website with it. Here's the full workflow The smooth scrolling, the animations, the transitions, all built with Fable 5. Here's how to get the same result instead of a generic template. 1. Steal a direction first. Go to Mobbin or Godly and find a site whose feel you love. Screenshot it. Fable copies a vibe far better than it invents one. 2. Grab real components. Pull animation-ready blocks from Aceternity UI or Magic UI. These are built for exactly this look (scroll reveals, parallax, gradients). 3. Prompt Fable with all of it. Switch to Fable 5 in Claude Code, drop in your screenshots and the component references, and describe the sections and scroll behavior you want. Let it plan before it builds. 4. Animate with the right tools. Tell it to use GSAP with ScrollTrigger for scroll effects, or Framer Motion for React. This is what separates "nice" from "$10k." 5. Iterate on feel, not code. Preview it, then give Fable specific notes ("slower fade, more spacing on mobile") until it lands. Bookmark this

Fokki

72,175 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD JUST KILLED THE $35,000 WEB AGENCY. The same animated website that used to cost between $6,000 and $35,000 can now be built in a single session for around $12 in AI credits. Claude Code handles the website. Higgsfield creates the visuals. Together, they can build a complete scroll-driven website from a simple prompt. Claude writes the layout, GSAP ScrollTrigger animations, Lenis smooth scrolling, responsive pages, and checks everything before you ship. Higgsfield generates the hero videos, cinematic transitions, ambient loops, thumbnails, and every visual asset you need. By the end of one session, you have a fully animated website with cinematic motion, smooth scrolling, optimized assets, responsive layouts, and polished visual effects like film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, and color tints. Getting started only takes a few minutes. Add Higgsfield as an MCP server inside Claude Code, complete the OAuth login once, and Claude can generate and pull videos directly into your project without manually exporting anything. The prompts are simple. Give Claude your project brief and ask it to script the entire scroll experience. Tell it to generate a hero video and supporting clips for every section. Ask it to add the finishing touches like film grain, particles, glass cards, and scroll pacing. Then let it review the site, improve loading speed, fix mobile layouts, and rewrite anything that doesn’t work. This replaces work that usually looks like this: A $6,000-$35,000 web agency. An $800-$2,000 motion designer. A $2,000-$10,000 front-end developer. And weeks of back-and-forth before launch. Now it’s Fable 5, Higgsfield, a subscription, a few dollars in AI credits, and one session. The pipeline used to be the advantage. Now it’s just a prompt. Full breakdown in the article below.

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD JUST KILLED THE $35,000 WEB AGENCY. The same animated website that used to cost between $6,000 and $35,000 can now be built in a single session for around $12 in AI credits. Claude Code handles the website. Higgsfield creates the visuals. Together, they can build a complete scroll-driven website from a simple prompt. Claude writes the layout, GSAP ScrollTrigger animations, Lenis smooth scrolling, responsive pages, and checks everything before you ship. Higgsfield generates the hero videos, cinematic transitions, ambient loops, thumbnails, and every visual asset you need. By the end of one session, you have a fully animated website with cinematic motion, smooth scrolling, optimized assets, responsive layouts, and polished visual effects like film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, and color tints. Getting started only takes a few minutes. Add Higgsfield as an MCP server inside Claude Code, complete the OAuth login once, and Claude can generate and pull videos directly into your project without manually exporting anything. The prompts are simple. Give Claude your project brief and ask it to script the entire scroll experience. Tell it to generate a hero video and supporting clips for every section. Ask it to add the finishing touches like film grain, particles, glass cards, and scroll pacing. Then let it review the site, improve loading speed, fix mobile layouts, and rewrite anything that doesn’t work. This replaces work that usually looks like this: A $6,000-$35,000 web agency. An $800-$2,000 motion designer. A $2,000-$10,000 front-end developer. And weeks of back-and-forth before launch. Now it’s Fable 5, Higgsfield, a subscription, a few dollars in AI credits, and one session. The pipeline used to be the advantage. Now it’s just a prompt. Full breakdown in the article below.

MIKE

142,642 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Claude Code + Google Stitch 2.0 is f*cking cracked 🤯 Google just dropped a free AI design agent that solves Claude Code's biggest weakness: frontend design. One screenshot of a high-converting landing page → a production-ready site for your brand in minutes. All inside Google Stitch + Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are building advertorial pages and product launch pages for Meta but burning days on designer back-and-forth. If you're running Meta ads and need 5-10 different landing pages testing different hooks, angles, and offers — each one targeting a different audience and pain point — you know the bottleneck isn't the ads. It's the pages. Briefing designers, waiting for revisions, paying $2-5K per page. Stitch eliminates the design bottleneck: → Find a high-converting advertorial that's scaling on Meta → Screenshot it and drop it into Stitch (powered by Gemini 3.1) → Stitch redesigns it with your brand's colors, fonts, and imagery using Nano Banana 2 → Edit sections visually — headlines, CTAs, layouts — without touching code → Export the code and paste it into Claude Code → Claude builds the full production site and deploys to Vercel or Netlify in 60 seconds No designer. No $3K per landing page. No Claude Code frontend that looks like a template from 2019. What you get: → Designer-quality landing pages and advertorials built in minutes, not weeks → Visual editing so you actually see the design before you code it → Nano Banana 2 generating on-brand product imagery and hero shots → A repeatable system — new angle, new page, same pipeline Built 100% with Google Stitch 2.0 + Claude Code. I put together a full playbook showing the exact workflow: how to find winning pages, redesign them in Stitch, and deploy with Claude Code. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "STITCH" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

126,469 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

this effect is all over tiktok right now and nobody's explaining how to actually do it properly... the 3d balloon character thing. where someone turns into a shiny inflatable version of themselves that still moves and talks. looks pretty smooth in feeds. the workflow is stupid simple once you see it. step 1: take any photo. drop it into an image gen tool (nano banana pro). prompt it with something like "make the person in the photo a plastic blow up balloon character with a shiny surface. keep the face details as 3d balloon details including the person in the background. don't change background" that's it for the image. don't overcomplicate the prompt. shorter = more consistent results. (learned this after wasting like 2 hours trying to get "perfect" prompts that kept giving me garbage) step 2: take that balloon image + your original video and drop both into kling motion control. prompt: "turn the motion and detailed mouth movement of the video to the setting of the image" that's literally it. kling maps the motion from the real video onto the balloon character. mouth moves. head turns. expressions transfer. the whole thing renders in a few minutes. the result looks like a $500 custom animation and costs you maybe $0.30 in kling credits. people are getting 500k+ views with these because the scroll-stop factor is insane. nobody expects to see a shiny inflatable version of someone giving a real speech or doing a product review. the play here is obvious btw. run this for client content (mix with the hook and real body, check the results yourself) or use it on your own faceless channels as a hook pattern before the algo catches up...

this effect is all over tiktok right now and nobody's explaining how to actually do it properly... the 3d balloon character thing. where someone turns into a shiny inflatable version of themselves that still moves and talks. looks pretty smooth in feeds. the workflow is stupid simple once you see it. step 1: take any photo. drop it into an image gen tool (nano banana pro). prompt it with something like "make the person in the photo a plastic blow up balloon character with a shiny surface. keep the face details as 3d balloon details including the person in the background. don't change background" that's it for the image. don't overcomplicate the prompt. shorter = more consistent results. (learned this after wasting like 2 hours trying to get "perfect" prompts that kept giving me garbage) step 2: take that balloon image + your original video and drop both into kling motion control. prompt: "turn the motion and detailed mouth movement of the video to the setting of the image" that's literally it. kling maps the motion from the real video onto the balloon character. mouth moves. head turns. expressions transfer. the whole thing renders in a few minutes. the result looks like a $500 custom animation and costs you maybe $0.30 in kling credits. people are getting 500k+ views with these because the scroll-stop factor is insane. nobody expects to see a shiny inflatable version of someone giving a real speech or doing a product review. the play here is obvious btw. run this for client content (mix with the hook and real body, check the results yourself) or use it on your own faceless channels as a hook pattern before the algo catches up...

KNOX

25,773 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Perplexity Computer in 60 seconds: 1. It's a cloud-based AI employee that runs tasks in the background. 2. 19 models working together. Claude for reasoning, GPT-5.2 for research, Grok for speed tasks. You don't pick. It routes automatically. 3. 400+ connectors. Gmail, Slack, Notion, Salesforce, HubSpot. One click to enable each. 4. Credits, not tokens. Simple tasks cost ~30. Complex builds cost 1,000+. Vague prompts waste them. Specific prompts save them. 5. Spaces = persistent project folders. Upload context once, every task inherits it. 6. Scheduled tasks run on autopilot. "Every Monday, prep my calendar." Set it and forget it. The PRD hack alone (in the article) will save you hundreds in credits. Full breakdown in the article below.

Perplexity Computer in 60 seconds: 1. It's a cloud-based AI employee that runs tasks in the background. 2. 19 models working together. Claude for reasoning, GPT-5.2 for research, Grok for speed tasks. You don't pick. It routes automatically. 3. 400+ connectors. Gmail, Slack, Notion, Salesforce, HubSpot. One click to enable each. 4. Credits, not tokens. Simple tasks cost ~30. Complex builds cost 1,000+. Vague prompts waste them. Specific prompts save them. 5. Spaces = persistent project folders. Upload context once, every task inherits it. 6. Scheduled tasks run on autopilot. "Every Monday, prep my calendar." Set it and forget it. The PRD hack alone (in the article) will save you hundreds in credits. Full breakdown in the article below.

Corey Ganim

106,105 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Claude "Puzzling" while GPT 5.6 on GOD-MODE just bade a banger that's mindblowing. Here's the exact way to get a site like this, step by step: > open the desktop app, pick Sol, reasoning on High. taste work never goes to small models > drop it 3 sites with motion you love and one line: "reverse-engineer the art direction: mood, typography, pacing, and WHY each animation exists. save it as a style bible" > brief in one paragraph, goal not steps: "[your niche] site, cinematic scroll, every animation has a job. follow the bible" > house rules on top: no template hero, no stock gradients, nothing on the page moves without a reason > now the bar: "a motion designer can't tell this from an agency build." spin up a SECOND 5.6 with fresh context whose only job is to FAIL the build against that bar > /loop overnight: build, grade, close the biggest gap, again. you're asleep for all of it > when the verifier runs out of complaints: tag Sites. live URL, one click, zero hosting The deeper version of every step (the full contract, the house rules, the verifier trick, when Ultra is worth the bill) is in the article below. P.S. send the article to your GPT and tell it "we're doing this tonight".

Claude "Puzzling" while GPT 5.6 on GOD-MODE just bade a banger that's mindblowing. Here's the exact way to get a site like this, step by step: > open the desktop app, pick Sol, reasoning on High. taste work never goes to small models > drop it 3 sites with motion you love and one line: "reverse-engineer the art direction: mood, typography, pacing, and WHY each animation exists. save it as a style bible" > brief in one paragraph, goal not steps: "[your niche] site, cinematic scroll, every animation has a job. follow the bible" > house rules on top: no template hero, no stock gradients, nothing on the page moves without a reason > now the bar: "a motion designer can't tell this from an agency build." spin up a SECOND 5.6 with fresh context whose only job is to FAIL the build against that bar > /loop overnight: build, grade, close the biggest gap, again. you're asleep for all of it > when the verifier runs out of complaints: tag Sites. live URL, one click, zero hosting The deeper version of every step (the full contract, the house rules, the verifier trick, when Ultra is worth the bill) is in the article below. P.S. send the article to your GPT and tell it "we're doing this tonight".

Miraqle

206,624 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

A CHINESE GUY STOPPED PAYING WEB DESIGNERS $1,800 PER LANDING PAGE AND BUILT THE SAME KIND OF SITE WITH CLAUDE CODE IN ONE AFTERNOON FOR LESS THAN $70 claude was not just writing code. it was doing the job of a designer, copywriter and frontend dev in one window. in 4 hours, one rough idea turned into the layout, color system, font choices, page sections and the full html/css/js build the real trick was the references. he gave claude 5 screenshots, made it ask 7 questions first, then pushed it toward one clear visual direction instead of accepting another generic ai-looking template the first version already looked solid. the second pass made it feel expensive: better typography, a darker palette, mobile cleanup, cursor effects, 6 micro-interactions and custom hero visuals his old workflow was burning $1,200 on design, $500 on frontend work and another $150 on small fixes every time he needed a new page. now the whole test costs less than $70 and the site still looks like something a $5,000 agency would ship the edge is not “ai builds websites.” the edge is that one person can now brief, critique, polish and launch in one afternoon without waiting 10 days for a designer to send version one

A CHINESE GUY STOPPED PAYING WEB DESIGNERS $1,800 PER LANDING PAGE AND BUILT THE SAME KIND OF SITE WITH CLAUDE CODE IN ONE AFTERNOON FOR LESS THAN $70 claude was not just writing code. it was doing the job of a designer, copywriter and frontend dev in one window. in 4 hours, one rough idea turned into the layout, color system, font choices, page sections and the full html/css/js build the real trick was the references. he gave claude 5 screenshots, made it ask 7 questions first, then pushed it toward one clear visual direction instead of accepting another generic ai-looking template the first version already looked solid. the second pass made it feel expensive: better typography, a darker palette, mobile cleanup, cursor effects, 6 micro-interactions and custom hero visuals his old workflow was burning $1,200 on design, $500 on frontend work and another $150 on small fixes every time he needed a new page. now the whole test costs less than $70 and the site still looks like something a $5,000 agency would ship the edge is not “ai builds websites.” the edge is that one person can now brief, critique, polish and launch in one afternoon without waiting 10 days for a designer to send version one

Gipp 🦅

304,719 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Claude Fable 5 + Claude Design is f*cking insane 🤯 Anthropic just dropped its most intelligent model ever, and the first thing I pointed it at was email design. I built a complete email campaign design in Claude Design, and the difference is night and day: tighter layouts, cleaner hierarchy, on-brand from the first generation. All inside Claude Design with Fable 5. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are still paying email agencies $3-5K/month for campaign designs that take 2 weeks to ship. If your campaign calendar is packed but every new email means briefing a designer, waiting on mockups, sending notes, and waiting again... This workflow eliminates the entire bottleneck: → Load your brand design system into Claude Design once (colors, fonts, logo, button styling) → Switch the model to Claude Fable 5 — Anthropic's new state-of-the-art model with the best vision of any AI → Prompt the campaign email section by section: header, hero, headline, offer block, CTA → Fable 5 nails layout and brand details that older models fumbled → Iterate inline — swap images, adjust styling, color-pick directly in the canvas → Export the finished email and hand off to your ESP No briefing a designer. No 2-week turnaround on a single campaign. No paying an agency $4K/month for 4 emails. What you get: → Campaign emails designed in minutes, not weeks → A reusable design system every new email pulls from automatically → Noticeably smarter design decisions from Fable 5's upgraded vision → Full inline editing before anything touches your ESP Built 100% with Claude Design + Claude Fable 5. I recorded a full walkthrough showing exactly how this works. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "FABLE" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

43,201 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

this video is 100% AI made it in under 10 minutes all you need is: - sora 2 - a dialed prompt - optionally an upscaler if you're still paying $500+ per UGC clip to creators who take 5 days to deliver you're literally burning money the quality has gotten to the point where it's genuinely hard to tell the difference one person with the right prompts and workflow can now output what entire creative teams used to do we've built an entire system around this and my whop members are landing brand deals with AI content that clients can't even tell isn't real i'm running AI UGC like this for coaching/bizopp offers right now and the CPAs are competing with real creator content, if you're selling anything online and you're not using AI content yet you're leaving money on the table

MAX

104,719 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Almost every brand I’ve talked to has asked me about showing up in LLM answers. Here’s what matters most: 1. Mentions → Does AI actually bring up your brand? 2. Sentiment → When it does… is it positive or negative? 3. Citations → Are you being referenced as a source? You can win in traffic and still lose here. So what actually moves this? 1. Visibility across AI platforms (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, etc.) 2. Site structure that machines can understand (not just humans) 3. Content designed to answer questions (not just rank for keywords) 4. Trust signals across the internet (reviews, mentions, third-party validation) We’re early, but the data is already clear. AI-attributed commerce is growing fast, and this is only going to compound. You can treat this like SEO in 2012. Or you can get ahead of it now. We put everything we’re seeing into an AI visibility playbook for ecommerce brands. Worth a read if you care about how customers will find you next.

Maxx Blank 🐳

812,417 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Claude + Meta + GPT Image 2 = AI UGC FACTORY Here's the free workflow Real UGC creators charge $150-$500 per video. 5-7 day turnaround. By the time you get 12 variants, your winning angle is already dead. We built a system that does 12 unique video ads in under an hour. Cost per video? Less than your coffee. The stack: • HeyOz (product import + export hub) • Claude (creative director + prompt engine) • GPT Image 2 (photorealistic starting frames) • Seedance 2.0 (animation) Broke down the entire thing in a step-by-step guide. What you'll get: → The exact 5-step workflow from URL to finished ad → 3 copy-paste image prompts (Stanley Quencher example) → 3 matching motion prompts for Seedance → The prompt framework that fixes 90% of bad AI outputs → Why grip specificity is the make-or-break variable most people miss → The 70/30 strategy for scaling (AI for testing, humans for winners) No design skills needed. No Canva. No CapCut. No Adobe. Just paste your product URL. Generate. Export. Launch. If you're running Meta or TikTok ads and your creative rotation is slower than your ad spend, this is for you. Comment "factory" to get access (must be following)

Claude + Meta + GPT Image 2 = AI UGC FACTORY Here's the free workflow Real UGC creators charge $150-$500 per video. 5-7 day turnaround. By the time you get 12 variants, your winning angle is already dead. We built a system that does 12 unique video ads in under an hour. Cost per video? Less than your coffee. The stack: • HeyOz (product import + export hub) • Claude (creative director + prompt engine) • GPT Image 2 (photorealistic starting frames) • Seedance 2.0 (animation) Broke down the entire thing in a step-by-step guide. What you'll get: → The exact 5-step workflow from URL to finished ad → 3 copy-paste image prompts (Stanley Quencher example) → 3 matching motion prompts for Seedance → The prompt framework that fixes 90% of bad AI outputs → Why grip specificity is the make-or-break variable most people miss → The 70/30 strategy for scaling (AI for testing, humans for winners) No design skills needed. No Canva. No CapCut. No Adobe. Just paste your product URL. Generate. Export. Launch. If you're running Meta or TikTok ads and your creative rotation is slower than your ad spend, this is for you. Comment "factory" to get access (must be following)

HeyOz

43,291 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

New IG Ads Feature! Found this new feature where it loads the landing page inside the comments. Pretty smart way for Meta to shift high intent users from comments to the site annnnd maybe inflate link click numbers. I have so many questions and a couple thoughts... Questions: 1. Was anyone notified about this? 2. At what point exactly does this count as a "link click" in Ads Manager? When the full page takes over the whole screen? 3. How is this impacting external tracking? This will surely track more visits and bounces... 4. Is this a new trick for Meta to gobble more externally measured attribution credit? 5. What determines if your page gets shown here or doesn't? I'm still seeing ads that don't do this. Thoughts: A. Seems like landing pages with highly relevant and potent headlines and imagery will help win here. B. Don't let your cookie consent bar block your entire page's content in this view little view.

New IG Ads Feature! Found this new feature where it loads the landing page inside the comments. Pretty smart way for Meta to shift high intent users from comments to the site annnnd maybe inflate link click numbers. I have so many questions and a couple thoughts... Questions: 1. Was anyone notified about this? 2. At what point exactly does this count as a "link click" in Ads Manager? When the full page takes over the whole screen? 3. How is this impacting external tracking? This will surely track more visits and bounces... 4. Is this a new trick for Meta to gobble more externally measured attribution credit? 5. What determines if your page gets shown here or doesn't? I'm still seeing ads that don't do this. Thoughts: A. Seems like landing pages with highly relevant and potent headlines and imagery will help win here. B. Don't let your cookie consent bar block your entire page's content in this view little view.

Barry Hott ☄️

17,978 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

A SOLO CREATOR JUST SHIPPED A $35,000-TIER ANIMATED SITE IN ONE WEEKEND - WITH CLAUDE CODE + HIGGSFIELD, FOR THE COST OF A SUBSCRIPTION. What you're looking at isn't a template. It's a fully animated, scroll-driven site, generated end to end in a single agentic session. What's actually on the page: → Cinematic motion clips pulled from 30+ generative models → Scroll animations written automatically - not a single hand-coded keyframe → 6 cinematic effects baked in with zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing Scroll the demo and one question keeps surfacing: a person didn't build this by hand… did they? For studios billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. What this normally takes: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs between all three → 6 systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis smooth-scroll, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It's what justified the invoice. Here's the part the agency won't put in its pitch deck. The price gap: → Boutique agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Industry average project: ~$5,280 → Your cost: a Claude subscription + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → Timeline: weeks of production → one session One operator now runs all six systems in a single pass and ships a working site - without opening a frame extractor or writing one CSS keyframe. Full breakdown of how it's built in the article below. Save it & read today 👇

A SOLO CREATOR JUST SHIPPED A $35,000-TIER ANIMATED SITE IN ONE WEEKEND - WITH CLAUDE CODE + HIGGSFIELD, FOR THE COST OF A SUBSCRIPTION. What you're looking at isn't a template. It's a fully animated, scroll-driven site, generated end to end in a single agentic session. What's actually on the page: → Cinematic motion clips pulled from 30+ generative models → Scroll animations written automatically - not a single hand-coded keyframe → 6 cinematic effects baked in with zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing Scroll the demo and one question keeps surfacing: a person didn't build this by hand… did they? For studios billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. What this normally takes: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs between all three → 6 systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis smooth-scroll, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It's what justified the invoice. Here's the part the agency won't put in its pitch deck. The price gap: → Boutique agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Industry average project: ~$5,280 → Your cost: a Claude subscription + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → Timeline: weeks of production → one session One operator now runs all six systems in a single pass and ships a working site - without opening a frame extractor or writing one CSS keyframe. Full breakdown of how it's built in the article below. Save it & read today 👇

ZEUS⚡️

21,779 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Claude Design is f*cking cracked for landing pages 🤯 Find any competitor's e-com lander → feed it to Claude Design w/ your brand's design system → get back a fully rebuilt version in your brand, your copy, your design. All inside Claude Design. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are still paying freelancers to build advertorial pages from scratch. If you're finding landers that have been running on Meta for 6+ months and want to test the same structure for your brand —> Briefing a designer, waiting a week, getting back a flat mockup, giving notes, waiting again... Claude Design eliminates the entire loop: → Use Go Full Pag to screenshot the full competitor lander → Feed it to Claude Design with your design system → Prompt it to extract the exact section structure and rebuild it for your brand → It rewrites all copy, applies your fonts, colors, and layout → Iterate section by section — send a screenshot of what you want to fix, it fixes it → Drop in your product images and founder photos as you go No designer. No back-and-forth briefs. No starting from scratch. What you get: -> Full production-ready lander built around a proven structure that's already converting on Meta -> Live elements (countdown timers, animated sections) auto-generated -> Mobile and desktop versions you can refine with plain-English prompts -> A repeatable system — new competitor, new screenshots, same pipeline I put together a full playbook breaking down the exact process — the prompts, the section-by-section editing approach, and how to set this up for any competitor lander. Want it completely for free? > Like this post > Comment "CLONE" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

37,966 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Veo 3.1 + n8n is insane 🤯 Google's new model lets you generate studio-quality UGC videos that look like they cost $1k to produce. Copy my entire automated workflow below 👇 Most e-commerce brands & creative agencies are stuck choosing between: → Expensive creator networks ($500-$2k per video) → In-house production (weeks of coordination) → Stock footage that looks generic This n8n automation cuts through all of that. Here's the complete process: Step 1: Upload one product image to an n8n form Step 2: AI generates multiple UGC prompt variations automatically Step 3: Veo 3.1 renders each prompt into ultra-realistic video Step 4: System creates testimonials, unboxings, demos & lifestyle shots Step 5: All videos delivered to your workspace production-ready Total cost per video: $2-3 Total time: 15 minutes for 20+ videos Full commercial rights: yours forever This is the same workflow I've been using to generate 100+ UGC videos for e-comm brands. 100% automated. Want the complete n8n workflow? > Comment "VEO" > Like this post And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Veo 3.1 + n8n is insane 🤯 Google's new model lets you generate studio-quality UGC videos that look like they cost $1k to produce. Copy my entire automated workflow below 👇 Most e-commerce brands & creative agencies are stuck choosing between: → Expensive creator networks ($500-$2k per video) → In-house production (weeks of coordination) → Stock footage that looks generic This n8n automation cuts through all of that. Here's the complete process: Step 1: Upload one product image to an n8n form Step 2: AI generates multiple UGC prompt variations automatically Step 3: Veo 3.1 renders each prompt into ultra-realistic video Step 4: System creates testimonials, unboxings, demos & lifestyle shots Step 5: All videos delivered to your workspace production-ready Total cost per video: $2-3 Total time: 15 minutes for 20+ videos Full commercial rights: yours forever This is the same workflow I've been using to generate 100+ UGC videos for e-comm brands. 100% automated. Want the complete n8n workflow? > Comment "VEO" > Like this post And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

83,844 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

THIS GUY JUST REBUILT A $35,000 ANIMATED SITE FOR $12. IF YOU RUN A WEB STUDIO, YOU SHOULD PROBABLY KEEP SCROLLING. Every agency billing $100-149/hr is selling you five departments wearing one invoice. Here’s each one - collapsed into a single agentic session. LAYER 1 - THE CONCEPT ROOM (Claude) Reads the brief, pulls references, and scripts the scroll: what the visitor feels at second 3, second 15, second 40. → Used to be a strategist and a wall of mood boards. Now it’s a conversation. LAYER 2 - THE MOTION STUDIO (Higgsfield) Cinematic clips from 30+ generative models - hero shots, transitions, ambient loops - all matched to the story from Layer 1. → Used to be a motion artist on retainer. Now it’s a prompt. LAYER 3 - THE DEV TEAM (Claude Code) Scaffolds the site, writes the GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. → A full scroll-driven build with zero hand-coded keyframes. LAYER 4 - THE DESIGN DEPT (baked-in cinematic layer) Six effects, zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. → The polish that justified the invoice - now it ships by default. LAYER 5 - THE QA PASS (Claude) Checks load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands - then rewrites whatever doesn’t. → Used to be a client call and a revision cycle. Now it’s one more turn in the same session. Five departments. One operator. One pass. A strategist, a motion artist, a developer, a designer, and a QA lead - weeks of handoffs - now run in a single session. For a Claude subscription and a few dollars of Higgsfield credits. The studio was never selling talent. It was selling overhead. And the overhead just became five layers. Follow me, reply “website” to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

THIS GUY JUST REBUILT A $35,000 ANIMATED SITE FOR $12. IF YOU RUN A WEB STUDIO, YOU SHOULD PROBABLY KEEP SCROLLING. Every agency billing $100-149/hr is selling you five departments wearing one invoice. Here’s each one - collapsed into a single agentic session. LAYER 1 - THE CONCEPT ROOM (Claude) Reads the brief, pulls references, and scripts the scroll: what the visitor feels at second 3, second 15, second 40. → Used to be a strategist and a wall of mood boards. Now it’s a conversation. LAYER 2 - THE MOTION STUDIO (Higgsfield) Cinematic clips from 30+ generative models - hero shots, transitions, ambient loops - all matched to the story from Layer 1. → Used to be a motion artist on retainer. Now it’s a prompt. LAYER 3 - THE DEV TEAM (Claude Code) Scaffolds the site, writes the GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. → A full scroll-driven build with zero hand-coded keyframes. LAYER 4 - THE DESIGN DEPT (baked-in cinematic layer) Six effects, zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. → The polish that justified the invoice - now it ships by default. LAYER 5 - THE QA PASS (Claude) Checks load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands - then rewrites whatever doesn’t. → Used to be a client call and a revision cycle. Now it’s one more turn in the same session. Five departments. One operator. One pass. A strategist, a motion artist, a developer, a designer, and a QA lead - weeks of handoffs - now run in a single session. For a Claude subscription and a few dollars of Higgsfield credits. The studio was never selling talent. It was selling overhead. And the overhead just became five layers. Follow me, reply “website” to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

ZEUS⚡️

141,973 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад