正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Biased Bev’s explanation for ruling Dr. Laposata’s unqualified to testify about dog bites or portions of her opinions on injuries from a vehicle pedestrian collision makes no sense. 1) Dr. Laposata has been qualified by a federal judge as an expert on dog bites, but I’m sure Bev knows... better! 🤣 2) She’s worked on approximately 50 cases with dog bite injuries 3) She uses the same methodology as Dr. Marie Russell, who corrupt Cannone already qualified as a dog bite expert 4) Judge Bev’s own reasoning here would unequivocally exclude the Commonwealth’s non-medical doctor dog behaviorist, Dr. Crosby, from providing expert testimony on medical causation of the injuries on John’s arm #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenReadshow more

Olivia

28,195 subscribers

112,575 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治喜剧

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 条评论

Linda Kenney Baden (she/her) 的头像

Linda Kenney Baden (she/her)1 年前

This ruling is dead set wrong. The forensic pathologist is the only person who sees the dead body with injuries. If Cannone were going to do a DAUBERT should have been before trial so to other forensic paths could testify or submit certifications saying her "methodology" based on experience etc is valid! @JusticeServedTV

UserInterface 的头像

UserInterface4 年前

Did You Know Dog Insurance Was a Thing? #pets #dogs #petcare

Michelle #AmericaFirst 的头像

Michelle #AmericaFirst1 年前

@aburkhartlaw So a "dog behaviorist" has more qualification to opine on dog bites than a forensic pathologist who's been an ME in several different states for nearly 5 decades?? Got it.🤦‍♀️

Bill -_- 的头像

Bill -_-1 年前

@aburkhartlaw Cannone has gone way past being biased into the corrupt zone. No justice is possible in her court.

𝙴𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚑 #𝕁𝕦𝕡𝕚𝕥𝕖𝕣𝕀𝕍𝔾𝕒𝕟𝕘 的头像

𝙴𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚑 #𝕁𝕦𝕡𝕚𝕥𝕖𝕣𝕀𝕍𝔾𝕒𝕟𝕘1 年前

@aburkhartlaw Reversible error

SallyCinnamon 的头像

SallyCinnamon1 年前

@aburkhartlaw I don't think it's going to matter much what Biased Bev thinks or rules about this qualified expert's dog bite testimony. Defense is brilliant! Wait for it!

michelle L 的头像

michelle L1 年前

@aburkhartlaw For Hank, the less the jury hears about dog bites (from either side), the better.

Frank Parker, Jr. ESQ, DDH, PDQ, BLT. 的头像

Frank Parker, Jr. ESQ, DDH, PDQ, BLT.1 年前

@aburkhartlaw Jackson must be laughing internally going over her credentials on direct. Auntie Bev REALLY screwed the pooch on this one. Pun intended.

The Cuban Sandwich Crisis 的头像

The Cuban Sandwich Crisis1 年前

@aburkhartlaw I love that Alan is usin the rest of the day to run through all of the credentials and ticky-tack details. It may seem like a waste of time, but it will all make sense once Hank starts objecting to every question here very soon.

*~The~Truth~Is~Always~The~Strongest~Argument~* 的头像

*~The~Truth~Is~Always~The~Strongest~Argument~*1 年前

@aburkhartlaw i mean it kinda does make sense if ya think about it… 🫤

Smathers 的头像

Smathers1 年前

@aburkhartlaw "the crime scene"

相关视频

During trial 1, Bev allowed Dr. Frank Sheridan - A FORENSIC PATHOLOGIST, the same profession as Dr. Laposata, to testify about JOKs injuries being….. DOG. BITES. Bev Cannone HAS to see the writing on the wall for the CW. She’s been awful throughout, but denying Laposata is such an awful ruling, even by her standards.

During trial 1, Bev allowed Dr. Frank Sheridan - A FORENSIC PATHOLOGIST, the same profession as Dr. Laposata, to testify about JOKs injuries being….. DOG. BITES. Bev Cannone HAS to see the writing on the wall for the CW. She’s been awful throughout, but denying Laposata is such an awful ruling, even by her standards.

Theecret Agent Flip

38,612 次观看 • 1 年前

This is exactly what a trial by ambush looks like. Why did the Commonwealth wait until June 5, 2025 to file a Motion In Limine to keep out Dr. Elizabeth Laposata’s testimony on medical causation of John O’Keefe’s injuries? If the Commonwealth’s Medical Examiner can testify about dog bites or pedestrian vehicle collisions in regard to medical causation of injury, why is any other Medical Examiner or Forensic Pathologist suddenly unqualified to do the same simply because they’re with the defense? God forbid the defense makes a record or Karen Read’s constitutional rights be protected. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead

This is exactly what a trial by ambush looks like. Why did the Commonwealth wait until June 5, 2025 to file a Motion In Limine to keep out Dr. Elizabeth Laposata’s testimony on medical causation of John O’Keefe’s injuries? If the Commonwealth’s Medical Examiner can testify about dog bites or pedestrian vehicle collisions in regard to medical causation of injury, why is any other Medical Examiner or Forensic Pathologist suddenly unqualified to do the same simply because they’re with the defense? God forbid the defense makes a record or Karen Read’s constitutional rights be protected. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

87,748 次观看 • 1 年前

Dr. Marie Russell, a dog bite expert, testified during Karen Read's retrial that the wounds discovered on John O'Keefe's arm "were inflicted as the result of a dog attack."

Dr. Marie Russell, a dog bite expert, testified during Karen Read's retrial that the wounds discovered on John O'Keefe's arm "were inflicted as the result of a dog attack."

Fox News

54,125 次观看 • 1 年前

Dr. Laposata literally teaches dog bite wound pattern recognition classes. In fact, she’s taught no less than thirteen dog bite wound pattern recognition classes. I think that makes her an expert. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead

Dr. Laposata literally teaches dog bite wound pattern recognition classes. In fact, she’s taught no less than thirteen dog bite wound pattern recognition classes. I think that makes her an expert. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

43,926 次观看 • 1 年前

Dr. Marie Russell makes a fantastic point about how on John O’Keefe’s right arm sweatshirt sleeve, the fibers at the puncture holes are coming outward, signifying that the entry object that caused the holes in the sleeve & the corresponding wounds on John’s arm, also exited or pulled out of the sleeve. This observation is highly characteristic of wounds caused by dog bites through a sleeve. However, this would not occur as the result of taillight, or any object for that matter, shattering onto John O’Keefe’s arm—as in that case, the shattered taillight pieces wouldn’t pull out or “exit” from the fabric like dog teeth would. This was the Commonwealth’s theory for the causation of injury, or the wounds on John O’Keefe’s right arm. Thoroughly debunked by Dr. Marie Russell. See evidence exhibits attached displaying the punctate holes with their fibers pulling outward from John O’Keefe’s sweatshirt sleeves. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup

Dr. Marie Russell makes a fantastic point about how on John O’Keefe’s right arm sweatshirt sleeve, the fibers at the puncture holes are coming outward, signifying that the entry object that caused the holes in the sleeve & the corresponding wounds on John’s arm, also exited or pulled out of the sleeve. This observation is highly characteristic of wounds caused by dog bites through a sleeve. However, this would not occur as the result of taillight, or any object for that matter, shattering onto John O’Keefe’s arm—as in that case, the shattered taillight pieces wouldn’t pull out or “exit” from the fabric like dog teeth would. This was the Commonwealth’s theory for the causation of injury, or the wounds on John O’Keefe’s right arm. Thoroughly debunked by Dr. Marie Russell. See evidence exhibits attached displaying the punctate holes with their fibers pulling outward from John O’Keefe’s sweatshirt sleeves. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup

Olivia

39,210 次观看 • 1 年前

Dog expert goes on a FKR podcast to talk about dog bites and tells Leslie Hall, nope, those are not dog bites.

Dog expert goes on a FKR podcast to talk about dog bites and tells Leslie Hall, nope, those are not dog bites.

Dan Donovan🌺

22,556 次观看 • 3 个月前

Imagine finally finding an "expert" to say a dog attacked but they don't know about the available bite mark comparisson or the fact their was no dog DNA? And they can't tell the difference between a bite or scratch? And who are the other bites supposed to be from?🙄#KarenRead

Imagine finally finding an "expert" to say a dog attacked but they don't know about the available bite mark comparisson or the fact their was no dog DNA? And they can't tell the difference between a bite or scratch? And who are the other bites supposed to be from?🙄#KarenRead

Killer Karen Read Case

25,449 次观看 • 2 年前

Remember when Hank Brennan tried to have a “gotcha!” moment with Dr. Marie Russell, acting as if he knows more than her about dog bites, when he claimed that they’re “routinely referred to as an hourglass shape”? Brennan went so far as to represent that “hourglass” is the industry standard term used to describe the shape of dog bites by experts in an attempt to imply that being unfamiliar with this term suggests one isn’t an expert. ———— Brennan asked: “Well in most professional studies by experts, isn’t it routinely referred to as an hourglass shape?” Dr. Russell replied: “I haven’t seen that at all.” Brennan asked: “Well have you read books on dog bites?” Dr. Russell replied: “I’ve read articles on dog bites.” Brennan asked: “Have you read books on dog bites?” Dr. Russell replied: “No. I have read articles on dog bites.” Brennan asked: “Have you ever read this book (Brennan holds up book)? Do you recognize this as an authority?” Dr. Russell replied: “No.” ———— There’s just one problem for Mr. Brennan. This—the term “hourglass” for describing the shape of dog bites—isn’t a standard known or used industry term, in fact, it isn’t even a term used by experts in the field, nor is it a term used in “professional studies” to describe the shape of dog bites. Unable to find any instances where the term “hourglass” is used in any of the literature, “professional studies”, scientific papers or expert testimony, I decided to consult Hank Brennan’s Dog Bible (I mean book) since he specifically cited to it as being a source that substantiates the supposed established & routine use of this terminology by experts in the field. However, in my quest to determine if this was in fact the case, I scanned through the entirety of Brennan’s “Dog Bites: A Multidisciplinary Perspective” book in order to find what he was referring to. Shockingly, for a term like “hourglass” that Brennan portrayed as being industry nomenclature, or specific verbiage used by experts & in books—particularly Brennan’s book—to describe & expertly qualify the distinct shape of dog bites, this book used the word “hourglass” one time across its 450+ pages. In its singular mention of the word “hourglass”, the book states: “The hourglass shape of a generalized dog bite is clearly different from the typical bow shape of a human bite” (pg. 237). Nowhere in this sentence, page or chapter of the book does it indicate that the word “hourglass” is a widely accepted & used term in the field for describing the shape of dog bites. Based on its singular reference & lack of routine use in this entire book about dog bites, I think it’s safe to say that Hank Brennan is not only wrong, but apparently didn’t read his own reference book—other than perhaps the one page mentioning “hourglass”. ———— Final note on Brennan’s apparent lack of discernment on what constitutes an authoritative source in the field, especially in the areas of science & medicine, and particularly as it relates to expert witness testimony: It’d also appear that Brennan is confusing “professional studies” with peer reviewed studies. This seems to be further reinforced by the fact that he leaned on “books” as a default authority source, when in actuality, it is very well understood both in the medical/scientific community, as well as in the legal world of expert witnesses, that the unequivocally reliable authoritative source is the peer-reviewed study—sometimes referred to as “articles” (aka academic research articles). You probably recall hearing Dr. Russell refer to many such “articles” (peer reviewed studies) throughout the hearing. Peer-reviewed studies, unlike “professional studies”, are academic research articles that undergo rigorous scrutiny by experts in the field (peers) before publication. This process ensures the quality, validity & originality of the research—unlike say a book, for instance, which has no barrier to publication. #KarenReadTrial

Remember when Hank Brennan tried to have a “gotcha!” moment with Dr. Marie Russell, acting as if he knows more than her about dog bites, when he claimed that they’re “routinely referred to as an hourglass shape”? Brennan went so far as to represent that “hourglass” is the industry standard term used to describe the shape of dog bites by experts in an attempt to imply that being unfamiliar with this term suggests one isn’t an expert. ———— Brennan asked: “Well in most professional studies by experts, isn’t it routinely referred to as an hourglass shape?” Dr. Russell replied: “I haven’t seen that at all.” Brennan asked: “Well have you read books on dog bites?” Dr. Russell replied: “I’ve read articles on dog bites.” Brennan asked: “Have you read books on dog bites?” Dr. Russell replied: “No. I have read articles on dog bites.” Brennan asked: “Have you ever read this book (Brennan holds up book)? Do you recognize this as an authority?” Dr. Russell replied: “No.” ———— There’s just one problem for Mr. Brennan. This—the term “hourglass” for describing the shape of dog bites—isn’t a standard known or used industry term, in fact, it isn’t even a term used by experts in the field, nor is it a term used in “professional studies” to describe the shape of dog bites. Unable to find any instances where the term “hourglass” is used in any of the literature, “professional studies”, scientific papers or expert testimony, I decided to consult Hank Brennan’s Dog Bible (I mean book) since he specifically cited to it as being a source that substantiates the supposed established & routine use of this terminology by experts in the field. However, in my quest to determine if this was in fact the case, I scanned through the entirety of Brennan’s “Dog Bites: A Multidisciplinary Perspective” book in order to find what he was referring to. Shockingly, for a term like “hourglass” that Brennan portrayed as being industry nomenclature, or specific verbiage used by experts & in books—particularly Brennan’s book—to describe & expertly qualify the distinct shape of dog bites, this book used the word “hourglass” one time across its 450+ pages. In its singular mention of the word “hourglass”, the book states: “The hourglass shape of a generalized dog bite is clearly different from the typical bow shape of a human bite” (pg. 237). Nowhere in this sentence, page or chapter of the book does it indicate that the word “hourglass” is a widely accepted & used term in the field for describing the shape of dog bites. Based on its singular reference & lack of routine use in this entire book about dog bites, I think it’s safe to say that Hank Brennan is not only wrong, but apparently didn’t read his own reference book—other than perhaps the one page mentioning “hourglass”. ———— Final note on Brennan’s apparent lack of discernment on what constitutes an authoritative source in the field, especially in the areas of science & medicine, and particularly as it relates to expert witness testimony: It’d also appear that Brennan is confusing “professional studies” with peer reviewed studies. This seems to be further reinforced by the fact that he leaned on “books” as a default authority source, when in actuality, it is very well understood both in the medical/scientific community, as well as in the legal world of expert witnesses, that the unequivocally reliable authoritative source is the peer-reviewed study—sometimes referred to as “articles” (aka academic research articles). You probably recall hearing Dr. Russell refer to many such “articles” (peer reviewed studies) throughout the hearing. Peer-reviewed studies, unlike “professional studies”, are academic research articles that undergo rigorous scrutiny by experts in the field (peers) before publication. This process ensures the quality, validity & originality of the research—unlike say a book, for instance, which has no barrier to publication. #KarenReadTrial

Olivia

31,675 次观看 • 1 年前

LIVE: MA v. #KarenRead Murder Retrial - Day 26 Dog bite expert Dr. Marie Russell returns to the witness stand to face cross-examination by the Commonwealth's Special Prosecutor Hank Brennen. #CourtTV What do YOU think? ⚖️ WATCH LIVE:

LIVE: MA v. #KarenRead Murder Retrial - Day 26 Dog bite expert Dr. Marie Russell returns to the witness stand to face cross-examination by the Commonwealth's Special Prosecutor Hank Brennen. #CourtTV What do YOU think? ⚖️ WATCH LIVE:

Court TV

22,489 次观看 • 1 年前

If a dog bites you, do not sit quietly after getting the rabies vaccine, but instead, demand compensation from the dog owner or the MCD for the trauma and pain caused by the dog bite. Beware of Dog Gangs!

If a dog bites you, do not sit quietly after getting the rabies vaccine, but instead, demand compensation from the dog owner or the MCD for the trauma and pain caused by the dog bite. Beware of Dog Gangs!

NCMIndia Council For Men Affairs

16,779 次观看 • 1 个月前

We receive 100+ Dog bite cases daily in our emergency. Pet Dog bites are more frequent & dangerous as I noticed in ER because multiple times we needed surgical & plastic surgery intervention. If you get a dog bite by stray or pet dog immediately go to hospital or nearest anti rabies centre to receive ARV &ARS/HRIG as per the dog bite category. If blood comes after dog bite always receive ARS/HRIG. There are proper guidelines for the rabies vaccine so always visit the nearest centre in case of dog bite whether it is stray or pet. The same applies to cats or monkey bite as well. #Rabies

We receive 100+ Dog bite cases daily in our emergency. Pet Dog bites are more frequent & dangerous as I noticed in ER because multiple times we needed surgical & plastic surgery intervention. If you get a dog bite by stray or pet dog immediately go to hospital or nearest anti rabies centre to receive ARV &ARS/HRIG as per the dog bite category. If blood comes after dog bite always receive ARS/HRIG. There are proper guidelines for the rabies vaccine so always visit the nearest centre in case of dog bite whether it is stray or pet. The same applies to cats or monkey bite as well. #Rabies

Dr.Monika Langeh

1,779,238 次观看 • 2 年前

Despite stating that “only medical doctors” are qualified & can testify as to the medical causation of an injury on June 18, 2024, Judge Cannone just ruled that Mr. Crosby can testify to the medical causation of an injury even though he’s not a medical doctor, he’s not a forensic odontologist or veterinarian, and he has no medical training or experience. Apparently, the Court’s rules, case law, and the rules of criminal procedure don’t apply to the prosecution, but are applied with the highest, strictest, most unreasonable and impossible to meet standards to the defense. In Judge Bev’s court, Karen Read’s defense team has the burden of proof! Even though criminal defendants are presumed innocent, if you don’t have at least $5 million dollars to throw away, you’re f*cked! And if you do, you’re still f*cked! Especially in Judge Beverly Cannone’s court. Is Judge Beverly Cannone unwell? I’ve truly not seen such a nonsensical decision that’s so obviously in direct contradiction with the Court’s own stated ruling on qualifying medical causation experts. In her decision, Judge Cannone states: “The defendant's objection goes to the weight of the evidence, not its admissibility.” Either Judge Cannone is lying or she doesn’t read the defense’s moving papers and affidavits, because the defense laid out a 15-page Motion, and 6-page Affidavit from its already qualified expert Dr. Marie Russell, detailing how Mr. Crosby is unqualified to offer medical causation testimony under the Daubert Lanigan standard. The Daubert Lanigan standard has everything to do with the admissibility of evidence, or expert testimony, and nothing to do with “the weight of the evidence.” But I thought Judge Cannone knew that? Her decision today suggests otherwise. Foundationally, it is undisputed that Mr. Crosby is not a medical doctor. He thus fails per se the “crucial” qualifications inquiry of the Daubert-Lanigan standard; this failure is not curable. On this basis alone his testimony must be excluded as he fails to meet the first, and crucial, prong of the Daubert-Lanigan standard for the reason expressed in the Court’s June 18th ruling during the first trial. In addition, the methodology that Crosby proffered is not generally accepted in the relevant medical community and is otherwise unreliable. But, who cares about the law, or Judge Bev’s candor to the court, right? Apparently in Massachusetts, candor to the court doesn’t apply to judges and they’re permitted to make amorphous, ever-evolving, fluid statements and rulings not based in the law, but rather subjectively and selectively applied to benefit one side. If ever you needed proof to show you just how unfit this Judge is to preside over this case—because her emotions and bias so overwhelm her ability to make fair, impartial rulings rooted in the law, literally causing her to defy her own standard previously stated in this courtroom on the record—well, here it is. If the Judge’s own standard is selectively enforced to ALWAYS prejudice the defendant and benefit the Commonwealth, then why do we even have standards to begin with? #KarenReadTrial #KarenRead

Despite stating that “only medical doctors” are qualified & can testify as to the medical causation of an injury on June 18, 2024, Judge Cannone just ruled that Mr. Crosby can testify to the medical causation of an injury even though he’s not a medical doctor, he’s not a forensic odontologist or veterinarian, and he has no medical training or experience. Apparently, the Court’s rules, case law, and the rules of criminal procedure don’t apply to the prosecution, but are applied with the highest, strictest, most unreasonable and impossible to meet standards to the defense. In Judge Bev’s court, Karen Read’s defense team has the burden of proof! Even though criminal defendants are presumed innocent, if you don’t have at least $5 million dollars to throw away, you’re fcked! And if you do, you’re still fcked! Especially in Judge Beverly Cannone’s court. Is Judge Beverly Cannone unwell? I’ve truly not seen such a nonsensical decision that’s so obviously in direct contradiction with the Court’s own stated ruling on qualifying medical causation experts. In her decision, Judge Cannone states: “The defendant's objection goes to the weight of the evidence, not its admissibility.” Either Judge Cannone is lying or she doesn’t read the defense’s moving papers and affidavits, because the defense laid out a 15-page Motion, and 6-page Affidavit from its already qualified expert Dr. Marie Russell, detailing how Mr. Crosby is unqualified to offer medical causation testimony under the Daubert Lanigan standard. The Daubert Lanigan standard has everything to do with the admissibility of evidence, or expert testimony, and nothing to do with “the weight of the evidence.” But I thought Judge Cannone knew that? Her decision today suggests otherwise. Foundationally, it is undisputed that Mr. Crosby is not a medical doctor. He thus fails per se the “crucial” qualifications inquiry of the Daubert-Lanigan standard; this failure is not curable. On this basis alone his testimony must be excluded as he fails to meet the first, and crucial, prong of the Daubert-Lanigan standard for the reason expressed in the Court’s June 18th ruling during the first trial. In addition, the methodology that Crosby proffered is not generally accepted in the relevant medical community and is otherwise unreliable. But, who cares about the law, or Judge Bev’s candor to the court, right? Apparently in Massachusetts, candor to the court doesn’t apply to judges and they’re permitted to make amorphous, ever-evolving, fluid statements and rulings not based in the law, but rather subjectively and selectively applied to benefit one side. If ever you needed proof to show you just how unfit this Judge is to preside over this case—because her emotions and bias so overwhelm her ability to make fair, impartial rulings rooted in the law, literally causing her to defy her own standard previously stated in this courtroom on the record—well, here it is. If the Judge’s own standard is selectively enforced to ALWAYS prejudice the defendant and benefit the Commonwealth, then why do we even have standards to begin with? #KarenReadTrial #KarenRead

Olivia

85,088 次观看 • 1 年前

Hank Brennan’s hired Dr. Laposata as an expert multiple times but is now suddenly questioning her qualifications when her conclusions don’t support his persecution? How telling. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead

Hank Brennan’s hired Dr. Laposata as an expert multiple times but is now suddenly questioning her qualifications when her conclusions don’t support his persecution? How telling. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

57,301 次观看 • 1 年前

$KAREN READ TRIAL REVIEW #3: Injuries don’t add up. Besides the wounds on his right arm, from the neck down, John O’Keefe had: - No significant injuries from the neck down - No injuries to his shoulders - No injuries to his chest area (aside from CPR related injuries) - No injuries to his torso - No injuries to his back - No injuries to his hips - No injuries to his pelvis - No injuries to his thighs - No injuries to his knees - No injuries to his shins - No injuries to his ankles - No injuries to his feet The Commonwealth alleges that Officer John O’Keefe was the victim of a pedestrian-vehicle collision. Yet, he did not have a single broken bone from the neck down. Not a single fracture other than from CPR administration. From the state’s Medical Examiner, Dr. Irini Scordi-Bello’s testimony, trial 1. #CantonCoverup #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe$

KAREN READ TRIAL REVIEW #3: Injuries don’t add up. Besides the wounds on his right arm, from the neck down, John O’Keefe had: - No significant injuries from the neck down - No injuries to his shoulders - No injuries to his chest area (aside from CPR related injuries) - No injuries to his torso - No injuries to his back - No injuries to his hips - No injuries to his pelvis - No injuries to his thighs - No injuries to his knees - No injuries to his shins - No injuries to his ankles - No injuries to his feet The Commonwealth alleges that Officer John O’Keefe was the victim of a pedestrian-vehicle collision. Yet, he did not have a single broken bone from the neck down. Not a single fracture other than from CPR administration. From the state’s Medical Examiner, Dr. Irini Scordi-Bello’s testimony, trial 1. #CantonCoverup #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

31,718 次观看 • 1 年前

Dr. Laposata might be my new favorite expert. I mean seriously, what’s better than watching her laugh in the face of Hank Brennan for the stupidity of his questions? #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead

Dr. Laposata might be my new favorite expert. I mean seriously, what’s better than watching her laugh in the face of Hank Brennan for the stupidity of his questions? #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

30,076 次观看 • 1 年前