Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Bitcoin Outflows From Binance Hit a Three-Year High More than 13,800 bitcoin:native left Binance on Sept. 22, according to CryptoQuant data. This marked the exchange’s largest single-day Bitcoin outflow since 2023. Binance’s reserves also fell from about 705,000 BTC to 685,000 BTC. The 20,000 BTC decline happened over just... show more

BSCN

1,378,219 subscribers

23,729 views • 4 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨DATA: WHALE ACTIVITY ON LINK INTENSIFIES AMID ALTS WEAKNESS On-chain data shows whale activity on $LINK is sharply intensifying. Top 10 daily outflow transactions on Binance have spiked twice, with over 8,000 LINK pulled in a single day, according to CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost. Monthly average outflows from the top 10 have climbed from ~2,000 to ~2,600 LINK since mid-February. Large exchange withdrawals typically signal reduced selling pressure. This comes despite brutal conditions across the broader altcoin market.

🚨DATA: WHALE ACTIVITY ON LINK INTENSIFIES AMID ALTS WEAKNESS On-chain data shows whale activity on $LINK is sharply intensifying. Top 10 daily outflow transactions on Binance have spiked twice, with over 8,000 LINK pulled in a single day, according to CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost. Monthly average outflows from the top 10 have climbed from ~2,000 to ~2,600 LINK since mid-February. Large exchange withdrawals typically signal reduced selling pressure. This comes despite brutal conditions across the broader altcoin market.

BSCN

12,084 views • 6 months ago

MICHAEL SAYLOR IS IN SERIOUS TROUBLE The last few days have been the worst for $MSTR in a long time Despite massive share issuance and constant $BTC accumulation, the losses keep piling up: - $11 billion underwater on BTC holdings - MSTR down 72% from its 2025 peak - First BTC sale in four years, just to pay STRC dividends The most convicted Bitcoin holder on earth just blinked Welcome to the other side of that trade

MICHAEL SAYLOR IS IN SERIOUS TROUBLE The last few days have been the worst for $MSTR in a long time Despite massive share issuance and constant $BTC accumulation, the losses keep piling up: - $11 billion underwater on BTC holdings - MSTR down 72% from its 2025 peak - First BTC sale in four years, just to pay STRC dividends The most convicted Bitcoin holder on earth just blinked Welcome to the other side of that trade

bee🐝

43,692 views • 3 months ago

😱 I'VE LOST $525,000+ IN #BITCOIN Not from a scam. Not from a hack. From my own stupidity. 5 $BTC → sent to an address on a computer I wiped. 2.5 BTC → sitting in a wallet I'll never access again. That's 7.5 BTC. Gone. Forever. But I'm not even the worst case. This guy missed ONE digit in a wallet address. One single character. And sent 55,000 BTC to the wrong place. That's over $3.8 BILLION. Gone because of a copy-paste error. And you know what? I am still here telling you to buy Bitcoin. Because the only thing worse than losing Bitcoin… is never owning any.

😱 I'VE LOST $525,000+ IN #BITCOIN Not from a scam. Not from a hack. From my own stupidity. 5 $BTC → sent to an address on a computer I wiped. 2.5 BTC → sitting in a wallet I'll never access again. That's 7.5 BTC. Gone. Forever. But I'm not even the worst case. This guy missed ONE digit in a wallet address. One single character. And sent 55,000 BTC to the wrong place. That's over $3.8 BILLION. Gone because of a copy-paste error. And you know what? I am still here telling you to buy Bitcoin. Because the only thing worse than losing Bitcoin… is never owning any.

Davinci Jeremie

192,815 views • 6 months ago

my bot doesn't predict bitcoin it just waits for polymarket to catch up to binance spot price moves, polymarket takes 2-3 seconds to reprice agent buys the lag, waits 5 minutes, collects 288 windows per day. every single day trading bots pulled $60M on polymarket last year 77% from exactly this one inefficiency most traders ask "will btc go up?" - wrong question "how long until polymarket catches up?" - that's the one that pays $130 to $14,400 in 47 days not from predicting btc correctly. from timing a 2-second delay Bookmark to copy strategy to your Bot later gap resets every 5 minutes doesn't care about your macro thesis

my bot doesn't predict bitcoin it just waits for polymarket to catch up to binance spot price moves, polymarket takes 2-3 seconds to reprice agent buys the lag, waits 5 minutes, collects 288 windows per day. every single day trading bots pulled $60M on polymarket last year 77% from exactly this one inefficiency most traders ask "will btc go up?" - wrong question "how long until polymarket catches up?" - that's the one that pays $130 to $14,400 in 47 days not from predicting btc correctly. from timing a 2-second delay Bookmark to copy strategy to your Bot later gap resets every 5 minutes doesn't care about your macro thesis

Livsun

20,761 views • 4 months ago

🔥STRATEGY WILL BE THE WORLD'S MOST VALUABLE COMPANY🔥 Strategy bought OVER 56,000 Bitcoin in April. That number is so absurd people are psychologically incapable of processing it. Post-halving miners produce roughly 13,500 BTC per month. Strategy just bought about 4.1x an entire month of new miner supply in one month. Now run the simple monster math: Today: Strategy BTC stack: 818,334 BTC Bitcoin price: $76,196 Bitcoin NAV: $62.35B Assume Strategy keeps buying 56,000 BTC per month for 5 years. That is: ASSUMING STRC GROWTH TOTALLY STOPS (LOL) ~672,000 BTC per year ~3,360,000 BTC over 5 years Their stack goes from: 818,334 BTC to 4,178,334 BTC Now assume Bitcoin compounds at 25% CAGR. Bitcoin goes from: $76,196 to roughly: $232,532 So the Bitcoin NAV becomes: 4,178,334 BTC × $232,532 = roughly $971.5 BILLION Almost $1 TRILLION in Bitcoin NAV. And the funniest part? This model assumes no mNAV expansion. No premium insanity. No additional acceleration. No credit flywheel getting stronger. No market panic as everyone realizes Strategy is vacuuming Bitcoin off the planet like a publicly traded monetary black hole. Just: 56,000 BTC per month. 25% Bitcoin CAGR. 5 years. That’s it. Don't think they can accumulate that much Bitcoin at that low of a CAGR? Think the Bitcoin CAGR has to go higher? Cool. That only helps Strategy buy more Bitcoin. The bear case is basically: “Sure, they are absorbing multiples of new supply, building the largest corporate Bitcoin balance sheet in history, converting fiat capital markets into Bitcoin ownership, and compounding NAV at escape velocity, but have you considered that I am emotionally upset?” MSTR is becoming the most aggressive Bitcoin accumulation machine ever built. The fiat world is still modeling it like a tech stock with a weird treasury policy. GOOD LUCK.

🔥STRATEGY WILL BE THE WORLD'S MOST VALUABLE COMPANY🔥 Strategy bought OVER 56,000 Bitcoin in April. That number is so absurd people are psychologically incapable of processing it. Post-halving miners produce roughly 13,500 BTC per month. Strategy just bought about 4.1x an entire month of new miner supply in one month. Now run the simple monster math: Today: Strategy BTC stack: 818,334 BTC Bitcoin price: $76,196 Bitcoin NAV: $62.35B Assume Strategy keeps buying 56,000 BTC per month for 5 years. That is: ASSUMING STRC GROWTH TOTALLY STOPS (LOL) ~672,000 BTC per year ~3,360,000 BTC over 5 years Their stack goes from: 818,334 BTC to 4,178,334 BTC Now assume Bitcoin compounds at 25% CAGR. Bitcoin goes from: $76,196 to roughly: $232,532 So the Bitcoin NAV becomes: 4,178,334 BTC × $232,532 = roughly $971.5 BILLION Almost $1 TRILLION in Bitcoin NAV. And the funniest part? This model assumes no mNAV expansion. No premium insanity. No additional acceleration. No credit flywheel getting stronger. No market panic as everyone realizes Strategy is vacuuming Bitcoin off the planet like a publicly traded monetary black hole. Just: 56,000 BTC per month. 25% Bitcoin CAGR. 5 years. That’s it. Don't think they can accumulate that much Bitcoin at that low of a CAGR? Think the Bitcoin CAGR has to go higher? Cool. That only helps Strategy buy more Bitcoin. The bear case is basically: “Sure, they are absorbing multiples of new supply, building the largest corporate Bitcoin balance sheet in history, converting fiat capital markets into Bitcoin ownership, and compounding NAV at escape velocity, but have you considered that I am emotionally upset?” MSTR is becoming the most aggressive Bitcoin accumulation machine ever built. The fiat world is still modeling it like a tech stock with a weird treasury policy. GOOD LUCK.

Adam Livingston

61,606 views • 5 months ago

🔥METAPLANET MOON MATH🔥 Metaplanet had a 568.2% BTC Yield last year. Their small size helped. Even assuming they never trade at a huge multiple, and assuming a much lower BTC Yield, the returns are still ridiculous over the next 5 years. 1× mNAV returns with a 75 % BTC Yield + 30 % Bitcoin CAGR over the next 10 years are flat-out insane: Year 0: 35,102 BTC, $2.64 Year 1: 61,428 BTC, $6 Year 2: 107,500 BTC, $14 Year 3: 188,125 BTC, $31 Year 4: 329,218 BTC, $71 Year 5: 576,132 BTC, $161 Year 6: 1,008,231 BTC, $366 Year 7: 1,764,405 BTC, $833 Year 8: 3,087,708 BTC, $1,894 Year 9: 5,403,489 BTC, $4,310 Year 10: 9,456,106 BTC, $9,804 Halfway through the decade gets you as 61x here with those inputs. Lots of unknowns with this trade, keep in mind that they aim to have 210,000 BTC by end of 2027 and this is projecting about half that with 107,500. 75% BTC Yield for 10 years also will not happen. If you look at the results from this input, years 5-7 is where it starts to get ridiculous. Strategy was able to achieve more than Metaplanet's Year 5 number in a harder currency and by trailblazing... but getting around 1 million Bitcoin by year 6 will be much tougher with prices being higher past 2030. W/ the 75% BTC yield input I think this is a somewhat reasonable result for the first 5 years. Still small enough for plenty of yield. Of course, you could imagine a multiple. Or an even higher BTC Yield initially, then lower. Or a steeper BTC CAGR. Adjust whatever inputs you want. All I know... We’re going a LOT higher, kids. $MPJPY

🔥METAPLANET MOON MATH🔥 Metaplanet had a 568.2% BTC Yield last year. Their small size helped. Even assuming they never trade at a huge multiple, and assuming a much lower BTC Yield, the returns are still ridiculous over the next 5 years. 1× mNAV returns with a 75 % BTC Yield + 30 % Bitcoin CAGR over the next 10 years are flat-out insane: Year 0: 35,102 BTC, $2.64 Year 1: 61,428 BTC, $6 Year 2: 107,500 BTC, $14 Year 3: 188,125 BTC, $31 Year 4: 329,218 BTC, $71 Year 5: 576,132 BTC, $161 Year 6: 1,008,231 BTC, $366 Year 7: 1,764,405 BTC, $833 Year 8: 3,087,708 BTC, $1,894 Year 9: 5,403,489 BTC, $4,310 Year 10: 9,456,106 BTC, $9,804 Halfway through the decade gets you as 61x here with those inputs. Lots of unknowns with this trade, keep in mind that they aim to have 210,000 BTC by end of 2027 and this is projecting about half that with 107,500. 75% BTC Yield for 10 years also will not happen. If you look at the results from this input, years 5-7 is where it starts to get ridiculous. Strategy was able to achieve more than Metaplanet's Year 5 number in a harder currency and by trailblazing... but getting around 1 million Bitcoin by year 6 will be much tougher with prices being higher past 2030. W/ the 75% BTC yield input I think this is a somewhat reasonable result for the first 5 years. Still small enough for plenty of yield. Of course, you could imagine a multiple. Or an even higher BTC Yield initially, then lower. Or a steeper BTC CAGR. Adjust whatever inputs you want. All I know... We’re going a LOT higher, kids. $MPJPY

Adam Livingston

30,335 views • 9 months ago

$BTC is at $61,000 and you're about to hit buy. Wait sixty seconds: • $250,000 on Coinbase buys you roughly 4 BTC and the tax bill shows up later when you sell. • $250,000 into S21 XP miners hosted at $0.07/kWh is a different move. You deduct the full amount against your income this year under Section 179. Your ASICs start producing Bitcoin into your wallet from day one and over 24 months you're looking at 4+ BTC, KYC-free, mined below spot. The hardware keeps running in year 3, year 4, year 5. We're watching the same price. But the investors who set up their ASICs at cycle lows are the ones who look back and understand why the entry point mattered less than the structure they used to accumulate Bitcoin. Same capital. Very different outcome.

$BTC is at $61,000 and you're about to hit buy. Wait sixty seconds: • $250,000 on Coinbase buys you roughly 4 BTC and the tax bill shows up later when you sell. • $250,000 into S21 XP miners hosted at $0.07/kWh is a different move. You deduct the full amount against your income this year under Section 179. Your ASICs start producing Bitcoin into your wallet from day one and over 24 months you're looking at 4+ BTC, KYC-free, mined below spot. The hardware keeps running in year 3, year 4, year 5. We're watching the same price. But the investors who set up their ASICs at cycle lows are the ones who look back and understand why the entry point mattered less than the structure they used to accumulate Bitcoin. Same capital. Very different outcome.

Simple Mining

266,578 views • 3 months ago

This is shocking. On Monday, $BTC dumped from $63,800 to $61,000 liquidating $659M. Then on Tuesday, $BTC pumped above $64,600 liquidating another $309M. On Wednesday, $BTC dumped back to $61,500 liquidating $319M more. And over the next days, $BTC pumped to $64,500 once again, liquidating an extra $554M along the way. $1.8B total Crypto liquidations in 1 week!!! And that's a relatively quiet week for Crypto... Now imagine this is happening every single week, but on a 10x larger scale. Market makers are quite literally draining every single investor left in this market. No wonder the majority are pivoting to Stocks, AI etc. Serious changes are needed to stop this blatant manipulation and extraction in Crypto. How do we fix this?

This is shocking. On Monday, $BTC dumped from $63,800 to $61,000 liquidating $659M. Then on Tuesday, $BTC pumped above $64,600 liquidating another $309M. On Wednesday, $BTC dumped back to $61,500 liquidating $319M more. And over the next days, $BTC pumped to $64,500 once again, liquidating an extra $554M along the way. $1.8B total Crypto liquidations in 1 week!!! And that's a relatively quiet week for Crypto... Now imagine this is happening every single week, but on a 10x larger scale. Market makers are quite literally draining every single investor left in this market. No wonder the majority are pivoting to Stocks, AI etc. Serious changes are needed to stop this blatant manipulation and extraction in Crypto. How do we fix this?

CryptoReviewing

97,490 views • 2 months ago

🚀ASST TO $700 PER SHARE?!?🚀 YOU THINK I'M JOKING? THINK AGAIN, BUCKO. Current ASST snapshot: BTC holdings: 15,000.5 BTC BTC price: $80,593 Bitcoin NAV: $1.21B Total debt: $10M Preferred outstanding: $495.95M Debt + preferred: $505.95M Amplification ratio: 41.9% Current stock price: $15.85 Now here’s the model, and this isn't MOONBOY NONSENSE, kids. This is with Bitcoin at $750k in 2036, not $1 million in 2034. ASST maintains their current 41.9% amplification ratio for 10 years. Translation for normal people: For every $1.00 of Bitcoin NAV, ASST keeps roughly $0.419 of senior claims through debt/preferred financing. The bears hear that and immediately start sweating through a Men’s Wearhouse suit. But this is the actual machine. As Bitcoin rises, the Bitcoin NAV rises. When the NAV rises, the old preferred stack becomes smaller relative to the treasury. So ASST issues more SATA to keep amplification at 41.9%. That new SATA capital buys more Bitcoin. Then Bitcoin goes up again. Then the NAV goes up again. Then the amplification ratio drops again. Then they issue more SATA again. Then they buy more Bitcoin again. This is how you turn a balance sheet into a legally registered orange crocodile. Now we add the funding mix: 75% of new Bitcoin accumulation comes from SATA. 25% comes from issuing common stock. And the common stock is issued at 1.2x EV mNAV. Meaning they are selling equity at a 20% premium to the enterprise value of the Bitcoin stack. That matters. Because issuing common below NAV is financial self-harm. Issuing common above NAV is accretive treasury sorcery. Now assume Bitcoin compounds at 25% per year for 10 years. BTC price goes from: $80,593 today to roughly: $750,579 in year 10 That is a 9.3x move in Bitcoin. Now what happens to ASST? Starting BTC stack: 15,000.5 BTC Projected year 10 BTC stack: 143,425 BTC That is 9.6x more Bitcoin. Starting Bitcoin NAV: $1.21B Projected year 10 Bitcoin NAV: $107.65B That is 89x larger. Now the bears will say: “BUT THE PREFERREDS!” Yes, Carl. The preferreds are the point. Senior claims rise from $505.95M to $45.11B because the model intentionally keeps amplification at 41.9%. That sounds terrifying until you remember the Bitcoin NAV grew to $107.65B. The stack got bigger. The senior claims got bigger. The common equity claim got bigger too. This is where CEBE comes in. CEBE = Common Equity Bitcoin Exposure. It answers the only question that matters: After debt and preferred holders get their claim, how much Bitcoin exposure does the common shareholder really own? Today: Gross BPS: 20,222 sats CEBE/share: 11,759 sats Year 10: Gross BPS: 95,380 sats CEBE/share: 55,416 sats That means common-equity Bitcoin exposure per share rises about 4.7x. Even after common issuance. Even after maintaining the preferred stack. Even after the bears finish their sacred ritual of screaming “DILUTION” into a spreadsheet they opened sideways. Now the share count. Current implied diluted shares: 74.2M Projected year 10 shares: 150.4M So yes, the share count roughly doubles in this model. But the Bitcoin stack goes 9.6x. This is the entire game. If Bitcoin holdings grow much faster than shares outstanding, the common shareholder’s Bitcoin exposure goes up. The bears think all issuance is bad because they learned finance from a Yahoo message board during a divorce. The actual question is: Does issuance increase Bitcoin per share after senior claims? In this model, yes. Now the stock price. Strict 1.2x EV mNAV model gets ASST to about: $559/share But if we anchor the model to today’s actual ASST price of $15.85, the same growth path gets you to roughly: $696/share Call it $700. There it is. ASST to $700 per share is not “vibes.” It is a model. BTC compounds at 25%. SATA funds 75% of accumulation. Common funds 25% at 1.2x EV mNAV. Amplification stays at 41.9%. BTC stack grows from 15,000 BTC to 143,425 BTC. Bitcoin NAV goes from $1.21B to $107.65B. CEBE/share goes from 11,759 sats to 55,416 sats. The stock goes from $15.85 to roughly $700. This is why small Bitcoin treasury companies are so insane. Strategy is the Death Star. ASST is the weird little orange lab experiment in the basement where someone accidentally discovers corporate finance methamphetamine. Tiny denominator. Preferred financing. Bitcoin accumulation. Premium equity issuance. CEBE expansion. A compounding treasury loop. The bear case is that dilution kills the common. The bull case is that accretive dilution plus preferred financing creates a Bitcoin-per-share machine that eats capital markets and leaves behind a pile of traumatized short sellers asking why their model still says “book value.” ASST to $700? If the machine works, yes. If Bitcoin does 25% CAGR, absolutely possible. If SATA scales and common gets issued above NAV, the goblin gets fed. And once the goblin gets fed, the spreadsheet starts looking like it was written by Saylor, Dylan LeClair, and a sleep-deprived Austrian economist locked inside a treasury dashboard with three Celsius energy drinks. This is not financial advice. This is FINANCIAL ENTERTAINMENT:

🚀ASST TO $700 PER SHARE?!?🚀 YOU THINK I'M JOKING? THINK AGAIN, BUCKO. Current ASST snapshot: BTC holdings: 15,000.5 BTC BTC price: $80,593 Bitcoin NAV: $1.21B Total debt: $10M Preferred outstanding: $495.95M Debt + preferred: $505.95M Amplification ratio: 41.9% Current stock price: $15.85 Now here’s the model, and this isn't MOONBOY NONSENSE, kids. This is with Bitcoin at $750k in 2036, not $1 million in 2034. ASST maintains their current 41.9% amplification ratio for 10 years. Translation for normal people: For every $1.00 of Bitcoin NAV, ASST keeps roughly $0.419 of senior claims through debt/preferred financing. The bears hear that and immediately start sweating through a Men’s Wearhouse suit. But this is the actual machine. As Bitcoin rises, the Bitcoin NAV rises. When the NAV rises, the old preferred stack becomes smaller relative to the treasury. So ASST issues more SATA to keep amplification at 41.9%. That new SATA capital buys more Bitcoin. Then Bitcoin goes up again. Then the NAV goes up again. Then the amplification ratio drops again. Then they issue more SATA again. Then they buy more Bitcoin again. This is how you turn a balance sheet into a legally registered orange crocodile. Now we add the funding mix: 75% of new Bitcoin accumulation comes from SATA. 25% comes from issuing common stock. And the common stock is issued at 1.2x EV mNAV. Meaning they are selling equity at a 20% premium to the enterprise value of the Bitcoin stack. That matters. Because issuing common below NAV is financial self-harm. Issuing common above NAV is accretive treasury sorcery. Now assume Bitcoin compounds at 25% per year for 10 years. BTC price goes from: $80,593 today to roughly: $750,579 in year 10 That is a 9.3x move in Bitcoin. Now what happens to ASST? Starting BTC stack: 15,000.5 BTC Projected year 10 BTC stack: 143,425 BTC That is 9.6x more Bitcoin. Starting Bitcoin NAV: $1.21B Projected year 10 Bitcoin NAV: $107.65B That is 89x larger. Now the bears will say: “BUT THE PREFERREDS!” Yes, Carl. The preferreds are the point. Senior claims rise from $505.95M to $45.11B because the model intentionally keeps amplification at 41.9%. That sounds terrifying until you remember the Bitcoin NAV grew to $107.65B. The stack got bigger. The senior claims got bigger. The common equity claim got bigger too. This is where CEBE comes in. CEBE = Common Equity Bitcoin Exposure. It answers the only question that matters: After debt and preferred holders get their claim, how much Bitcoin exposure does the common shareholder really own? Today: Gross BPS: 20,222 sats CEBE/share: 11,759 sats Year 10: Gross BPS: 95,380 sats CEBE/share: 55,416 sats That means common-equity Bitcoin exposure per share rises about 4.7x. Even after common issuance. Even after maintaining the preferred stack. Even after the bears finish their sacred ritual of screaming “DILUTION” into a spreadsheet they opened sideways. Now the share count. Current implied diluted shares: 74.2M Projected year 10 shares: 150.4M So yes, the share count roughly doubles in this model. But the Bitcoin stack goes 9.6x. This is the entire game. If Bitcoin holdings grow much faster than shares outstanding, the common shareholder’s Bitcoin exposure goes up. The bears think all issuance is bad because they learned finance from a Yahoo message board during a divorce. The actual question is: Does issuance increase Bitcoin per share after senior claims? In this model, yes. Now the stock price. Strict 1.2x EV mNAV model gets ASST to about: $559/share But if we anchor the model to today’s actual ASST price of $15.85, the same growth path gets you to roughly: $696/share Call it $700. There it is. ASST to $700 per share is not “vibes.” It is a model. BTC compounds at 25%. SATA funds 75% of accumulation. Common funds 25% at 1.2x EV mNAV. Amplification stays at 41.9%. BTC stack grows from 15,000 BTC to 143,425 BTC. Bitcoin NAV goes from $1.21B to $107.65B. CEBE/share goes from 11,759 sats to 55,416 sats. The stock goes from $15.85 to roughly $700. This is why small Bitcoin treasury companies are so insane. Strategy is the Death Star. ASST is the weird little orange lab experiment in the basement where someone accidentally discovers corporate finance methamphetamine. Tiny denominator. Preferred financing. Bitcoin accumulation. Premium equity issuance. CEBE expansion. A compounding treasury loop. The bear case is that dilution kills the common. The bull case is that accretive dilution plus preferred financing creates a Bitcoin-per-share machine that eats capital markets and leaves behind a pile of traumatized short sellers asking why their model still says “book value.” ASST to $700? If the machine works, yes. If Bitcoin does 25% CAGR, absolutely possible. If SATA scales and common gets issued above NAV, the goblin gets fed. And once the goblin gets fed, the spreadsheet starts looking like it was written by Saylor, Dylan LeClair, and a sleep-deprived Austrian economist locked inside a treasury dashboard with three Celsius energy drinks. This is not financial advice. This is FINANCIAL ENTERTAINMENT:

Adam Livingston

66,707 views • 4 months ago

The only strategy on Polymarket that actually works flawlessly. Bot that consistently makes $20,000 to $30,000/day. It started on January 6 with just $50. One month later the balance is close to $500,000. Honestly, I’m shocked. Yes, you’re right. It uses the same strategy on 15 minute markets trading BTC, ETH, and SOL. The bot doesn’t predict direction. It exploits latency by tracking spot prices on Binance and Coinbase. The tools that make this possible are explained in my article linked in my profile. According to his profile: > What do you think about this strategy? Might be time to try it yourself.

igorizuchaetcrypty

145,281 views • 7 months ago

James Wynn just opened another 40x Bitcoin short. For him this barely counts as news anymore. A year ago he ran a $1.25 BILLION Bitcoin position, the largest ever seen on Hyperliquid, then lost over $100 MILLION in a month. Instead of stopping, he kept going, getting liquidated more than 200 times and grinding his account from $100 MILLION down to under $1,000. Today it's a 12.57 $BTC short, around $830,000, at the same 40x that already destroyed him once. One small move and it's gone again. Everyone keeps waiting for him to learn his lesson. At some point you have to accept he isn't trading to win, he's just chasing the rush.

James Wynn just opened another 40x Bitcoin short. For him this barely counts as news anymore. A year ago he ran a $1.25 BILLION Bitcoin position, the largest ever seen on Hyperliquid, then lost over $100 MILLION in a month. Instead of stopping, he kept going, getting liquidated more than 200 times and grinding his account from $100 MILLION down to under $1,000. Today it's a 12.57 $BTC short, around $830,000, at the same 40x that already destroyed him once. One small move and it's gone again. Everyone keeps waiting for him to learn his lesson. At some point you have to accept he isn't trading to win, he's just chasing the rush.

Jeremy

75,932 views • 3 months ago

🚀3 PATHS TO $100 ASST🚀 ASST starts at $13.00. Reaching $100 requires a 7.69× total stock multiple. All three scenarios use a 24-month horizon. SATA issuance is expressed as a monthly average, meaning ASST could issue opportunistically rather than raising the exact same amount every month. PATH 1: BITCOIN-LED Average new SATA issuance: $0 per month BTC: $66.3K → $300K = 4.52× CEBE: 13,312 → 20,286 sats/share = 1.52× CEBE mNAV: 1.47× → 1.64× = 1.12× 4.52 × 1.52 × 1.12 = 7.69× Implied ASST price: $100 ASST issues no additional SATA. Its existing $782.95M preferred claim simply becomes much smaller when measured in BTC at $300K. PATH 2: BALANCED Average SATA issuance: $100M per month That means $2.40B of cumulative SATA issuance over 24 months, bringing the preferred balance to approximately $3.18B. At $200K Bitcoin: BTC holdings: 40,251 Senior claims: 14,912 BTC CEBE attributable to common: 25,339 BTC Diluted shares: 95.12M CEBE: 26,639 sats/share CEBE mNAV: 1.47× → 1.88× Return decomposition: BTC appreciation: 3.02× CEBE sats/share: 2.00× mNAV rerating: 1.27× 3.02 × 2.00 × 1.27 = 7.69× Implied ASST price: $100 This path cuts the projected SATA issuance rate by more than half. The tradeoff is that ASST must rerate from 1.47× to approximately 1.88× CEBE mNAV. PATH 3: SATA PLUS MULTIPLE EXPANSION Average SATA issuance: $150M per month That means $3.60B of cumulative SATA issuance over 24 months, bringing the preferred balance to approximately $4.38B. At $150K Bitcoin: BTC holdings: 56,162 Senior claims: 27,883 BTC CEBE attributable to common: 28,279 BTC Diluted shares: 99.02M CEBE: 28,558 sats/share CEBE mNAV: 1.47× → 2.33× Return decomposition: BTC appreciation: 2.26× CEBE sats/share: 2.15× mNAV rerating: 1.59× 2.26 × 2.15 × 1.59 = 7.69× Implied ASST price: $100 This is the lowest-Bitcoin path, but it demands the highest valuation. With BTC reaching only $150K, the market must eventually price ASST at approximately 2.33× CEBE mNAV. Reducing SATA issuance does not eliminate the path to $100. It changes which engine must do more work. Path one depends primarily on Bitcoin. Path two balances Bitcoin, $100M of average monthly SATA issuance, and moderate mNAV expansion. Path three relies on $150M of average monthly SATA issuance and a much larger valuation rerating. Every path reaches the same destination. The burden simply moves between Bitcoin appreciation, CEBE accretion, and mNAV expansion. Educational modeling only. Not investment advice.

🚀3 PATHS TO $100 ASST🚀 ASST starts at $13.00. Reaching $100 requires a 7.69× total stock multiple. All three scenarios use a 24-month horizon. SATA issuance is expressed as a monthly average, meaning ASST could issue opportunistically rather than raising the exact same amount every month. PATH 1: BITCOIN-LED Average new SATA issuance: $0 per month BTC: $66.3K → $300K = 4.52× CEBE: 13,312 → 20,286 sats/share = 1.52× CEBE mNAV: 1.47× → 1.64× = 1.12× 4.52 × 1.52 × 1.12 = 7.69× Implied ASST price: $100 ASST issues no additional SATA. Its existing $782.95M preferred claim simply becomes much smaller when measured in BTC at $300K. PATH 2: BALANCED Average SATA issuance: $100M per month That means $2.40B of cumulative SATA issuance over 24 months, bringing the preferred balance to approximately $3.18B. At $200K Bitcoin: BTC holdings: 40,251 Senior claims: 14,912 BTC CEBE attributable to common: 25,339 BTC Diluted shares: 95.12M CEBE: 26,639 sats/share CEBE mNAV: 1.47× → 1.88× Return decomposition: BTC appreciation: 3.02× CEBE sats/share: 2.00× mNAV rerating: 1.27× 3.02 × 2.00 × 1.27 = 7.69× Implied ASST price: $100 This path cuts the projected SATA issuance rate by more than half. The tradeoff is that ASST must rerate from 1.47× to approximately 1.88× CEBE mNAV. PATH 3: SATA PLUS MULTIPLE EXPANSION Average SATA issuance: $150M per month That means $3.60B of cumulative SATA issuance over 24 months, bringing the preferred balance to approximately $4.38B. At $150K Bitcoin: BTC holdings: 56,162 Senior claims: 27,883 BTC CEBE attributable to common: 28,279 BTC Diluted shares: 99.02M CEBE: 28,558 sats/share CEBE mNAV: 1.47× → 2.33× Return decomposition: BTC appreciation: 2.26× CEBE sats/share: 2.15× mNAV rerating: 1.59× 2.26 × 2.15 × 1.59 = 7.69× Implied ASST price: $100 This is the lowest-Bitcoin path, but it demands the highest valuation. With BTC reaching only $150K, the market must eventually price ASST at approximately 2.33× CEBE mNAV. Reducing SATA issuance does not eliminate the path to $100. It changes which engine must do more work. Path one depends primarily on Bitcoin. Path two balances Bitcoin, $100M of average monthly SATA issuance, and moderate mNAV expansion. Path three relies on $150M of average monthly SATA issuance and a much larger valuation rerating. Every path reaches the same destination. The burden simply moves between Bitcoin appreciation, CEBE accretion, and mNAV expansion. Educational modeling only. Not investment advice.

Adam Livingston

12,608 views • 2 months ago

SATA acquired an estimated ~291.5 BTC today. That would be assuming $19.13M raised out of the $96.44M daily volume. Is this accurate? Tough to know! We'll find out Monday I assume. But what does this look like for ASST's stock price if this was replicated every day for a year? Let's say there are about ~21 trading days per month... and Bitcoin is at $200k a year from now. It'll be a volatile, non-linear ride upward of course, but this is what it looks like if BTC moves linearly to that price point with this level of issuance. 21 x $19.3M raised = ~$400 million raised per month via SATA... zero ASST sold to buy Bitcoin. Zero mNAV expansion... mNAV trades at the same it does today. Common stock ASST is sold to fund dividends in this model. At $200K BTC: Ending BTC stack: 65,250 ₿ Ending CEBE sats/share: 43,614 CEBE Sats Yield: 228.9% annualized Ending implied stock price: $157.88 Total return vs today: 900% It is a 10x from today almost exactly. Does common equity own more residual Bitcoin per share after senior claims, dividends, and dilution? In this model, yes. A lot more. Not investment advice. This does not include the potential warrant exercises later this year. Issuing SATA adds a lot of LATENT POWER to the balance sheet. If Bitcoin goes up and to the right and it SATA issuance can continue to raise capital... well... ASST is a powder keg about to be ignited.

SATA acquired an estimated ~291.5 BTC today. That would be assuming $19.13M raised out of the $96.44M daily volume. Is this accurate? Tough to know! We'll find out Monday I assume. But what does this look like for ASST's stock price if this was replicated every day for a year? Let's say there are about ~21 trading days per month... and Bitcoin is at $200k a year from now. It'll be a volatile, non-linear ride upward of course, but this is what it looks like if BTC moves linearly to that price point with this level of issuance. 21 x $19.3M raised = ~$400 million raised per month via SATA... zero ASST sold to buy Bitcoin. Zero mNAV expansion... mNAV trades at the same it does today. Common stock ASST is sold to fund dividends in this model. At $200K BTC: Ending BTC stack: 65,250 ₿ Ending CEBE sats/share: 43,614 CEBE Sats Yield: 228.9% annualized Ending implied stock price: $157.88 Total return vs today: 900% It is a 10x from today almost exactly. Does common equity own more residual Bitcoin per share after senior claims, dividends, and dilution? In this model, yes. A lot more. Not investment advice. This does not include the potential warrant exercises later this year. Issuing SATA adds a lot of LATENT POWER to the balance sheet. If Bitcoin goes up and to the right and it SATA issuance can continue to raise capital... well... ASST is a powder keg about to be ignited.

Adam Livingston

15,473 views • 3 months ago

The only strategy on Polymarket that does not care if BTC goes to $200K or $0. Just $116,000 in February. Here is how it works. All of crypto Twitter is arguing where BTC is headed. Bulls, bears, charts, signals. Meanwhile the most profitable strategy on Polymarket right now does not even answer that question. A bot trades 15-minute markets on BTC, ETH and SOL. Does not predict direction. It watches the spot price on Binance and places bets on Polymarket before the oracle updates. Pure speed. Making its developer $8,000 - $10,000 a day. His profile: The price on Binance updates faster than the Polymarket oracle. The difference is seconds. But on 15-minute markets seconds = guaranteed profit. The bot does not predict the future, it trades the present that Polymarket has not seen yet. While everyone argues about direction someone is taking money from both sides.

Blaze

47,684 views • 7 months ago

As you could already see from my previous videos, the drop to $75,500 was expected at the same time as in 2023. In 2023, when Bitcoin experienced its first strong sell-off, a wick formed below the blue TEM zone. Measured from that point, it took roughly 5 days until Bitcoin fell 0.8% below the last TEM wick. I expected Bitcoin to once again drop 0.8% below the last wick outside the blue TEM area, which pointed to a price region of $75,500. The only change on the 4-hour timeframe is that a wick has formed below the blue zone once again. Looking at the timing and the day intervals, I conclude that Bitcoin has to see a pump within the next 3 days. If I compare the patterns one-to-one in percentage terms, $73,500 could be the exact target! If the $75k area is lost, $73,000–$73,900 are the next targets where I’ll add more to my long. Check out the picture! NFA Since this is a high-timeframe (1W) pattern, delays or deviations may occur on lower timeframes than 1W. It doesn't necessarily mean it has to happen again! bitcoin:native

As you could already see from my previous videos, the drop to $75,500 was expected at the same time as in 2023. In 2023, when Bitcoin experienced its first strong sell-off, a wick formed below the blue TEM zone. Measured from that point, it took roughly 5 days until Bitcoin fell 0.8% below the last TEM wick. I expected Bitcoin to once again drop 0.8% below the last wick outside the blue TEM area, which pointed to a price region of $75,500. The only change on the 4-hour timeframe is that a wick has formed below the blue zone once again. Looking at the timing and the day intervals, I conclude that Bitcoin has to see a pump within the next 3 days. If I compare the patterns one-to-one in percentage terms, $73,500 could be the exact target! If the $75k area is lost, $73,000–$73,900 are the next targets where I’ll add more to my long. Check out the picture! NFA Since this is a high-timeframe (1W) pattern, delays or deviations may occur on lower timeframes than 1W. It doesn't necessarily mean it has to happen again! bitcoin:native

XAPA

120,848 views • 17 days ago

I am very confident that Bitcoin will rise rather than fall. The bear market is over, so it is advisable to take every dip seriously when it comes to long-term investments. I still expect September to be bullish rather than bearish. The $85,000 to $87,000 range will be reached soon. I bought more Bitcoin and Ethereum today! In 2023, when Bitcoin topped (green circle), the 5D chart showed wick gaps between candles of no more than 1%. I expected that move for Monday. The difference this time, we had a weekend, in 2023 we didn’t. The stock market was closed on Monday, so I was expecting a 3-day delay. Since this is a high-timeframe (1W) pattern, delays or deviations may occur on lower timeframes than 1W. It doesn't necessarily mean it has to happen again! As soon as Bitcoin loses the area around $76,777, I’m targeting levels between $73,880 and $75,300. bitcoin:native

I am very confident that Bitcoin will rise rather than fall. The bear market is over, so it is advisable to take every dip seriously when it comes to long-term investments. I still expect September to be bullish rather than bearish. The $85,000 to $87,000 range will be reached soon. I bought more Bitcoin and Ethereum today! In 2023, when Bitcoin topped (green circle), the 5D chart showed wick gaps between candles of no more than 1%. I expected that move for Monday. The difference this time, we had a weekend, in 2023 we didn’t. The stock market was closed on Monday, so I was expecting a 3-day delay. Since this is a high-timeframe (1W) pattern, delays or deviations may occur on lower timeframes than 1W. It doesn't necessarily mean it has to happen again! As soon as Bitcoin loses the area around $76,777, I’m targeting levels between $73,880 and $75,300. bitcoin:native

XAPA

60,264 views • 22 days ago

A new all-time high for Solana. $17.3B in stablecoin supply! A look at the dollars powering it: ↳ USDC anchors the chain at $7.4B, the deepest, most liquid dollar on Solana ↳ Tether's $USDT keeps growing, now $2.7B and up more than 3x since 2023 ↳ USDGO went from launch to $1.4B in just nine months this year More issuers, more depth, more digital dollars on Solana than ever before. Data: Artemis

A new all-time high for Solana. $17.3B in stablecoin supply! A look at the dollars powering it: ↳ USDC anchors the chain at $7.4B, the deepest, most liquid dollar on Solana ↳ Tether's $USDT keeps growing, now $2.7B and up more than 3x since 2023 ↳ USDGO went from launch to $1.4B in just nine months this year More issuers, more depth, more digital dollars on Solana than ever before. Data: Artemis

Eco

20,087 views • 4 days ago

bitcoin:native UPDATE My local view on #BTC My plan: 1. We stopped at Strong Resistance - $83K (DONE) 2. Scenario one - pullback to at least $75K liquidity, then a move toward $83K–$85K (LOAD). 3. Fear & Greed Index - 71 4. Open Interest - rising, which means more traders are buying the dip, so we could see further downside. 5. Head & Shoulders pattern, which could play out at least as a liquidity sweep around $75,538. 6. Long zone 1: $74K/$72K 7. Long zone 2: $72K/$69K We got the correction from the Strong Resistance zone. The weekly 50 MA is also right there, so far everything is going according to plan. The plan remains the same - I’m waiting for safer long setups on bitcoin:native. Until Bitcoin breaks above $83K, the trend remains bearish. The monthly structure is, of course, very bullish for BTC, as the monthly candle closed with an engulfing pattern covering the previous two monthly candles. $ETH - still holding the long. $ETH - local trade closed at a loss after hitting my stop-loss. Coins I’m watching: $ETH, $SOL, $HYPE, $LIT, $PUMP, $MNT, $CAKE, $ZRO REMINDER: I warned about the BTC bull trap at $82K, the bounce from $62K, the summer drop, and the SPACE X decline before they even happened. FOLLOW ME AND TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS. MOST PEOPLE WILL FOLLOW ME TOO LATE.

bitcoin:native UPDATE My local view on #BTC My plan: 1. We stopped at Strong Resistance - $83K (DONE) 2. Scenario one - pullback to at least $75K liquidity, then a move toward $83K–$85K (LOAD). 3. Fear & Greed Index - 71 4. Open Interest - rising, which means more traders are buying the dip, so we could see further downside. 5. Head & Shoulders pattern, which could play out at least as a liquidity sweep around $75,538. 6. Long zone 1: $74K/$72K 7. Long zone 2: $72K/$69K We got the correction from the Strong Resistance zone. The weekly 50 MA is also right there, so far everything is going according to plan. The plan remains the same - I’m waiting for safer long setups on bitcoin:native. Until Bitcoin breaks above $83K, the trend remains bearish. The monthly structure is, of course, very bullish for BTC, as the monthly candle closed with an engulfing pattern covering the previous two monthly candles. $ETH - still holding the long. $ETH - local trade closed at a loss after hitting my stop-loss. Coins I’m watching: $ETH, $SOL, $HYPE, $LIT, $PUMP, $MNT, $CAKE, $ZRO REMINDER: I warned about the BTC bull trap at $82K, the bounce from $62K, the summer drop, and the SPACE X decline before they even happened. FOLLOW ME AND TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS. MOST PEOPLE WILL FOLLOW ME TOO LATE.

Tony Research

203,994 views • 1 month ago

A Chinese engineer from a Shenzhen HFT shop told me over hotpot that Wall Street is building the wrong half of the trade I met him through a founder I was helping in Futian. He hadn't slept in two days. His firm runs latency arb on Binance futures. "Every desk in New York predicts where BTC goes. Up. Down. Wrong question. The real question is who is too slow to update" I asked what he meant. "Chainlink" He pulled up Polymarket on his phone. "400 BTC windows a day. 5 minutes each. UP or DOWN. Resolves on the Chainlink feed. Chainlink lags Binance by 14 seconds on average. When Binance and Coinbase both move 50 bucks the same way, Chainlink follows within 2 minutes 94% of the time" He drew on a napkin soaked in chili oil. "You don't have to guess direction. Binance already told you. You just buy the side Chainlink hasn't reached yet. 4 minute window. Free money until the feed catches up" His wallet: "Wall Street builds $800M models to forecast BTC close. You just race a public oracle. Different equation. Different result" I flew home. Opened Claude Code. Typed what he said. "Build a 5-minute BTC engine on Polymarket. Enter 60-180 seconds after open when Binance and Coinbase both diverge from Chainlink by $50. Confirm with order book imbalance above 1.8. Exit at 75c. Stop at 35c" 86M historical trades. Claude ranked every window by Chainlink lag. Wrote the combiner overnight. NERVE GRID. BTC. ETH. SOL. AVAX. 400+ windows a day. Edge table live: Binance+Coinbase $50 divergence vs Chainlink. 63% alone. Book imbalance 1.8+ in the 30-90s window. 63% alone. Both signals agree. 71%. The system kills 85% of setups. Enters 50-60 a day. Winners are 4.2x the losers. Fill rate 96%. Avg latency 15ms. Early exit at 75c. Stop at 35c. Never trade the last 60 seconds. +$14,200 from $2,000 seed. 30 days. Sharpe 2.84. Infrastructure: $20 Claude. $5 Hetzner VPS. Four repos open source. $25/month. Copied the setup here: Texted him two weeks later with a screenshot. "You're racing the oracle" Claude built it from one hotpot dinner. "Good. Now try ETH during Tokyo hours. Chainlink updates slower on thinner pairs. Bigger window" I already was. He could see it in the second tab. Long pause. "You build faster than most quants at my firm. And you don't argue. That's the rare part" I didn't argue. I just listened.

A Chinese engineer from a Shenzhen HFT shop told me over hotpot that Wall Street is building the wrong half of the trade I met him through a founder I was helping in Futian. He hadn't slept in two days. His firm runs latency arb on Binance futures. "Every desk in New York predicts where BTC goes. Up. Down. Wrong question. The real question is who is too slow to update" I asked what he meant. "Chainlink" He pulled up Polymarket on his phone. "400 BTC windows a day. 5 minutes each. UP or DOWN. Resolves on the Chainlink feed. Chainlink lags Binance by 14 seconds on average. When Binance and Coinbase both move 50 bucks the same way, Chainlink follows within 2 minutes 94% of the time" He drew on a napkin soaked in chili oil. "You don't have to guess direction. Binance already told you. You just buy the side Chainlink hasn't reached yet. 4 minute window. Free money until the feed catches up" His wallet: "Wall Street builds $800M models to forecast BTC close. You just race a public oracle. Different equation. Different result" I flew home. Opened Claude Code. Typed what he said. "Build a 5-minute BTC engine on Polymarket. Enter 60-180 seconds after open when Binance and Coinbase both diverge from Chainlink by $50. Confirm with order book imbalance above 1.8. Exit at 75c. Stop at 35c" 86M historical trades. Claude ranked every window by Chainlink lag. Wrote the combiner overnight. NERVE GRID. BTC. ETH. SOL. AVAX. 400+ windows a day. Edge table live: Binance+Coinbase $50 divergence vs Chainlink. 63% alone. Book imbalance 1.8+ in the 30-90s window. 63% alone. Both signals agree. 71%. The system kills 85% of setups. Enters 50-60 a day. Winners are 4.2x the losers. Fill rate 96%. Avg latency 15ms. Early exit at 75c. Stop at 35c. Never trade the last 60 seconds. +$14,200 from $2,000 seed. 30 days. Sharpe 2.84. Infrastructure: $20 Claude. $5 Hetzner VPS. Four repos open source. $25/month. Copied the setup here: Texted him two weeks later with a screenshot. "You're racing the oracle" Claude built it from one hotpot dinner. "Good. Now try ETH during Tokyo hours. Chainlink updates slower on thinner pairs. Bigger window" I already was. He could see it in the second tab. Long pause. "You build faster than most quants at my firm. And you don't argue. That's the rare part" I didn't argue. I just listened.

Lunar

35,630 views • 5 months ago

Polymarket pays me $400 a day because it's slower than Binance by 2 seconds. And this is just the beginning - while I was writing this post, the bot made another $40. Let me explain. I built a bot on OpenClaw. It monitors Binance 24/7. Sees a sharp impulse - switches to high attention mode. If price doesn't snap back within a second (the impulse could be a squeeze) - it opens a trade on Polymarket in the same direction. Why this works. When BTC moves sharply, Polymarket odds don't have time to adjust. These windows appear every day - especially now, with elevated volatility across financial markets. I usually enter when the gap is 200+ points. Odds are still stale - I capture the spread before it closes. Aggressive mode - spreads from 100 points, significantly more trades per day. $20 per trade. 10-30 trades a day. Morning. Coffee. Open the laptop. The bot closed 14 trades overnight. Another good day

Polymarket pays me $400 a day because it's slower than Binance by 2 seconds. And this is just the beginning - while I was writing this post, the bot made another $40. Let me explain. I built a bot on OpenClaw. It monitors Binance 24/7. Sees a sharp impulse - switches to high attention mode. If price doesn't snap back within a second (the impulse could be a squeeze) - it opens a trade on Polymarket in the same direction. Why this works. When BTC moves sharply, Polymarket odds don't have time to adjust. These windows appear every day - especially now, with elevated volatility across financial markets. I usually enter when the gap is 200+ points. Odds are still stale - I capture the spread before it closes. Aggressive mode - spreads from 100 points, significantly more trades per day. $20 per trade. 10-30 trades a day. Morning. Coffee. Open the laptop. The bot closed 14 trades overnight. Another good day

may.crypto {🦅}

70,267 views • 7 months ago