Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

BITCOIN RAILS #63: Bitcoin's threshold for trust-minimization—without a soft fork | with Sam Blackshear Sam Blackshear 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌱 SPOTIFY: Some of the most impressive technical and commercial leaders in digital assets emerged from what insiders call the "Libra Mafia" — the team assembled by Meta to build Libra... (later Diem). Though the project ultimately succumbed to regulatory pressure, it produced a generation of founders and engineers who went on to shape the industry, including Sam Blackshear (Sam Blackshear), a leading expert in blockchain programming languages and CTO of MystenLabs.sui In this episode of Bitcoin Rails, Sam joins me to discuss: - Why Mysten Labs has turned its focus toward Bitcoin + why Sam leans conservative on soft-fork changes to Bitcoin script - What makes a strong crypto programming language + why EVM is missing the mark - Why trust minimization remains the critical technical challenge standing between Bitcoin and broader DeFi adoption - Why Mysten Lab's new Hashi architecture may be the most trust-minimized architecture for Bitcoin "bridging" without a soft fork This episode of Bitcoin Rails is brought to you by: LayerTwo Labs LayerTwo Labs — developing research, software, and technologies for scaling Bitcoin via the integration of Drivechains (BIP 300/301) Hashi on Sui — a primitive for executing Bitcoin DeFi transactions, without having to trust a federated bridge or other centralized entity BitBox BitBox — an open-source Bitcoin-only hardware wallet, with smooth UX and no compromises on security. Check out Bitbox [dot] swiss and use code BITCOINRAILS to get a discount TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 — Intro 01:09 — Sam's Origin Story 04:40 — Building Move Inside Libra 10:18 — Why Sui Looks Like Bitcoin 15:55 — Libra Dies & Sui Is Born 23:06 — Quantum Resistance & Sui's Cryptography 28:24 — Bitcoin's Programmability Problem 34:39 — How Hashi Works 38:00 — Hashi's Trust Assumptions 53:54 — Why Nobody Else Could Build This 56:24 — The Future of Building on Bitcoinshow more

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

16,266 subscribers

34,465 views • 26 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

BITCOIN RAILS #62: BITCOIN'S 3 BIGGEST CHALLENGES | with Neha Narula Director of Digital Currency Initiative (DCI) Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌱 SPOTIFY: Neha Narula is the Director of the MIT Digital Currency Initiative, where she focuses on Bitcoin research and the broader design tradeoffs of decentralized money systems. Her work often centers on what Bitcoin gets right—and where it runs into hard limits—especially around scaling, decentralization, and how systems behave as global demand increases. In this interview, Neha and I explore longer-term risks to Bitcoin—including advancements in quantum computing and the implications of a diminishing block subsidy—as well as the ongoing challenge of scaling Bitcoin without losing access to self-custody. A thoughtful conversation on how Bitcoin may change in the coming years, we also explore its social and governance dynamics—including tensions within the development community over protocol changes, scaling philosophies, and the future direction of the system. This episode of Bitcoin Rails is brought to you by: LayerTwo Labs LayerTwo Labs — developing research, software, and technologies for scaling Bitcoin via the integration of Drivechains (BIP 300/301) Hashi on Sui — a primitive for executing Bitcoin Defi transactions, without having to trust a federated bridge or other centralized entity BitBox BitBox— an open-source Bitcoin-only hardware wallet, with smooth UX and no compromises on security. Check out Bitbox [dot] swiss and use code BITCOINRAILS to get a discount TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 00:17 Neha’s Origins 02:26 Bitcoin to MIT 04:40 Media Lab Culture and Mission 11:34 CBDCs as Digital Cash Debate 24:42 Funding Model and Bitcoin Security Budget 29:55 Reorg Risk and Quantum Computing 32:14 Bitcoin Dev Funding Map 42:49 Governance and Corporate Stakes 50:23 Quantum Tradeoffs Framework 56:02 Post Quantum Proposals 58:59 Prioritize PQ Transactions 01:00:54 Satoshi Coins Debate 01:02:12 Mining Incentives And Price 01:08:08 Corporate Funding And Governance 01:10:54 Scaling Self Custody And L2s 01:20:30 Bitcoin Kernel And Wrap Up

BITCOIN RAILS #62: BITCOIN'S 3 BIGGEST CHALLENGES | with Neha Narula Director of Digital Currency Initiative (DCI) Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌱 SPOTIFY: Neha Narula is the Director of the MIT Digital Currency Initiative, where she focuses on Bitcoin research and the broader design tradeoffs of decentralized money systems. Her work often centers on what Bitcoin gets right—and where it runs into hard limits—especially around scaling, decentralization, and how systems behave as global demand increases. In this interview, Neha and I explore longer-term risks to Bitcoin—including advancements in quantum computing and the implications of a diminishing block subsidy—as well as the ongoing challenge of scaling Bitcoin without losing access to self-custody. A thoughtful conversation on how Bitcoin may change in the coming years, we also explore its social and governance dynamics—including tensions within the development community over protocol changes, scaling philosophies, and the future direction of the system. This episode of Bitcoin Rails is brought to you by: LayerTwo Labs LayerTwo Labs — developing research, software, and technologies for scaling Bitcoin via the integration of Drivechains (BIP 300/301) Hashi on Sui — a primitive for executing Bitcoin Defi transactions, without having to trust a federated bridge or other centralized entity BitBox BitBox— an open-source Bitcoin-only hardware wallet, with smooth UX and no compromises on security. Check out Bitbox [dot] swiss and use code BITCOINRAILS to get a discount TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 00:17 Neha’s Origins 02:26 Bitcoin to MIT 04:40 Media Lab Culture and Mission 11:34 CBDCs as Digital Cash Debate 24:42 Funding Model and Bitcoin Security Budget 29:55 Reorg Risk and Quantum Computing 32:14 Bitcoin Dev Funding Map 42:49 Governance and Corporate Stakes 50:23 Quantum Tradeoffs Framework 56:02 Post Quantum Proposals 58:59 Prioritize PQ Transactions 01:00:54 Satoshi Coins Debate 01:02:12 Mining Incentives And Price 01:08:08 Corporate Funding And Governance 01:10:54 Scaling Self Custody And L2s 01:20:30 Bitcoin Kernel And Wrap Up

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

23,827 views • 1 month ago

BITCOIN RAILS #61: QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY FOR BITCOIN | with Dan Boneh Dan Boneh 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌿 SPOTIFY: One of the most prolific and influential cryptographers in the world, it’s difficult to fully quantify the impact that Dan Boneh has had on Bitcoin and digital assets more broadly. Through both his own research and his mentorship of some of the space’s most important contributors — e.g. Andrew Poelstra, Benedikt Bünz ☕️, and Robin Linus — few people have done more to shape the cryptographic foundations underlying modern blockchains and digital finance. More recently, Dan co-authored Google's widely discussed paper, “Securing Elliptic Curve Cryptocurrencies against Quantum Vulnerabilities,” which reduced prior estimates of the resources required to run Shor’s algorithm against the elliptic-curve cryptography used by Bitcoin. The paper reignited debate around quantum computing timelines and the long-term security assumptions behind modern cryptocurrencies. In this episode of Bitcoin Rails, Dan and I discuss the current state of quantum computing, its potential implications for Bitcoin, and how he believes the Bitcoin community should think about preparing for a post-quantum future over the coming decade and beyond. And yes, Dan shares his take on the “when quantum” question in the interview, among other key perspectives. This episode of Bitcoin Rails is brought to you by my NEW sponsors: LayerTwo Labs LayerTwo Labs — developing research, software, and technologies for scaling Bitcoin via the integration of Drivechains (BIP 300/301) Hashi on Sui — a primitive for executing Bitcoin Defi transactions, without having to trust a federated bridge or other centralized entity BitBox BitBox — an open-source Bitcoin-only hardware wallet, with smooth UX and no compromises on security. Check out Bitbox [dot] swiss and use code BITCOINRAILS to get a discount TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 — Intro and Dan’s history with cryptography and Bitcoin 11:44 — Shor's algorithm: how a 1994 paper became cryptography's most important threat 16:39 — Building a quantum computer: superconducting qubits vs neutral atoms 25:37 — When should we start worrying about quantum computers? The timeline debate 31:51 — Have we already reached quantum computing's “ahá” moment? 39:09 — Inside the Google paper: how Shor's algorithm was optimized 49:57 — The Bitcoin mempool attack and the 10-minute window 59:21 — Mitigation: what should Bitcoin do to prepare for quantum? 1:11:54 — Hash-based vs lattice-based signatures: Dan's case for lattice 1:23:15 — ZK proofs, BIP361, and what to do with Satoshi's coins 1:31:52 — Encrypted mempools and MEV 1:38:29 — Why Bitcoin will survive quantum and Dan's message to Bitcoin builders

BITCOIN RAILS #61: QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY FOR BITCOIN | with Dan Boneh Dan Boneh 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌿 SPOTIFY: One of the most prolific and influential cryptographers in the world, it’s difficult to fully quantify the impact that Dan Boneh has had on Bitcoin and digital assets more broadly. Through both his own research and his mentorship of some of the space’s most important contributors — e.g. Andrew Poelstra, Benedikt Bünz ☕️, and Robin Linus — few people have done more to shape the cryptographic foundations underlying modern blockchains and digital finance. More recently, Dan co-authored Google's widely discussed paper, “Securing Elliptic Curve Cryptocurrencies against Quantum Vulnerabilities,” which reduced prior estimates of the resources required to run Shor’s algorithm against the elliptic-curve cryptography used by Bitcoin. The paper reignited debate around quantum computing timelines and the long-term security assumptions behind modern cryptocurrencies. In this episode of Bitcoin Rails, Dan and I discuss the current state of quantum computing, its potential implications for Bitcoin, and how he believes the Bitcoin community should think about preparing for a post-quantum future over the coming decade and beyond. And yes, Dan shares his take on the “when quantum” question in the interview, among other key perspectives. This episode of Bitcoin Rails is brought to you by my NEW sponsors: LayerTwo Labs LayerTwo Labs — developing research, software, and technologies for scaling Bitcoin via the integration of Drivechains (BIP 300/301) Hashi on Sui — a primitive for executing Bitcoin Defi transactions, without having to trust a federated bridge or other centralized entity BitBox BitBox — an open-source Bitcoin-only hardware wallet, with smooth UX and no compromises on security. Check out Bitbox [dot] swiss and use code BITCOINRAILS to get a discount TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 — Intro and Dan’s history with cryptography and Bitcoin 11:44 — Shor's algorithm: how a 1994 paper became cryptography's most important threat 16:39 — Building a quantum computer: superconducting qubits vs neutral atoms 25:37 — When should we start worrying about quantum computers? The timeline debate 31:51 — Have we already reached quantum computing's “ahá” moment? 39:09 — Inside the Google paper: how Shor's algorithm was optimized 49:57 — The Bitcoin mempool attack and the 10-minute window 59:21 — Mitigation: what should Bitcoin do to prepare for quantum? 1:11:54 — Hash-based vs lattice-based signatures: Dan's case for lattice 1:23:15 — ZK proofs, BIP361, and what to do with Satoshi's coins 1:31:52 — Encrypted mempools and MEV 1:38:29 — Why Bitcoin will survive quantum and Dan's message to Bitcoin builders

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

112,380 views • 1 month ago

BITCOIN RAILS #59: Post-Quantum Bitcoin Signatures (+ their tradeoffs) | with BIP 360 co-author Ethan ✨ is on BlueSky✨ Heilman 🐱 and Blockstream Head of Research Jonas Nick 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌿 SPOTIFY: According to BIP 360 co-author Ethan Heilman, Bitcoin needs a minimum of two soft forks to become quantum resistant: P2MR (or an output type that can safely execute PQ signatures) + a post-quantum checksig (signature scheme). Ethan and the BIP 360 team (including myself and Hunter Beast 🕯️) introduced the P2MR part via a BIP 360 update late last year—but the question remains, what’s the most appropriate PQ signature scheme for Bitcoin? They all have substantive tradeoffs, but hash-based signatures seem to be leading technical discourse—likely due to recent optimizations by Jonas Nick and the broader Blockstream research team. It was an honor to sit down with both of these men - arguably the two most influential and productive cryptographers in Bitcoin quantum mitigation right now - for an in-depth review of the leading PQ signature schemes and a temperature check on Bitcoin’s post-quantum planning process. TBH, if you want to skip the noise and jump straight to the signal on quantum, this is the interview to watch. In this episode, we discuss: - What needs to happen at the soft fork, infra, and mitigation levels to fully quantum-harden Bitcoin - Recent updates to BIP 360 + breakdown of the leading hash-based signatures schemes for Bitcoin (SHRINCS + SHRIMPS) - Why we may actually get consensus around a stateful scheme for Bitcoin - Comparisons of hash-based signatures vs Lattice and Isogeny-based schemes - Assessing the risks of both waiting too long and acting too fast (and why quantum is a better threat to be facing than a potential classical attack) This episode of Bitcoin Rails is brought to you by my NEW sponsors: - LayerTwo Labs LayerTwo Labs — developing research, software, and technologies for scaling Bitcoin via the integration of Drivechains (BIP 300/301) - Hashi on Sui — a primitive for executing Bitcoin Defi transactions, without having to trust a federated bridge or other centralized entity - BitBox BitBox — an open-source Bitcoin-only hardware wallet, with smooth UX and no compromises on security. Check out Bitbox [dot] swiss and use code BITCOINRAILS to get a discount TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 02:18 Ethan’s Quantum Wakeup 05:18 How Blockstream Enters Post Quantum 09:25 BIP 360 Explained 12:11 How Bitcoin Transitions to PQ 17:35 Choosing Post Quantum Signatures 23:20 How Blockstream Created SHRINCS 27:22 Signature Budgets Importance Explained 41:13 What are SHRIMPS? 44:51 SHRIMPS vs SHRINCS 47:48 Why SLH-DSA Alone Won’t Cut It 49:24 Is a SHRIMPS + SHRINCS BIP Coming? 51:51 Blockstream’s Big Plans for Liquid 59:04 Quantum Readiness Roadmap 01:02:22 Importance of a PQ Recovery Plan 01:05:35 How Long Would a PQ Migration Take 01:11:17 Quantum Watchlist Recommendations

BITCOIN RAILS #59: Post-Quantum Bitcoin Signatures (+ their tradeoffs) | with BIP 360 co-author Ethan ✨ is on BlueSky✨ Heilman 🐱 and Blockstream Head of Research Jonas Nick 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌿 SPOTIFY: According to BIP 360 co-author Ethan Heilman, Bitcoin needs a minimum of two soft forks to become quantum resistant: P2MR (or an output type that can safely execute PQ signatures) + a post-quantum checksig (signature scheme). Ethan and the BIP 360 team (including myself and Hunter Beast 🕯️) introduced the P2MR part via a BIP 360 update late last year—but the question remains, what’s the most appropriate PQ signature scheme for Bitcoin? They all have substantive tradeoffs, but hash-based signatures seem to be leading technical discourse—likely due to recent optimizations by Jonas Nick and the broader Blockstream research team. It was an honor to sit down with both of these men - arguably the two most influential and productive cryptographers in Bitcoin quantum mitigation right now - for an in-depth review of the leading PQ signature schemes and a temperature check on Bitcoin’s post-quantum planning process. TBH, if you want to skip the noise and jump straight to the signal on quantum, this is the interview to watch. In this episode, we discuss: - What needs to happen at the soft fork, infra, and mitigation levels to fully quantum-harden Bitcoin - Recent updates to BIP 360 + breakdown of the leading hash-based signatures schemes for Bitcoin (SHRINCS + SHRIMPS) - Why we may actually get consensus around a stateful scheme for Bitcoin - Comparisons of hash-based signatures vs Lattice and Isogeny-based schemes - Assessing the risks of both waiting too long and acting too fast (and why quantum is a better threat to be facing than a potential classical attack) This episode of Bitcoin Rails is brought to you by my NEW sponsors: - LayerTwo Labs LayerTwo Labs — developing research, software, and technologies for scaling Bitcoin via the integration of Drivechains (BIP 300/301) - Hashi on Sui — a primitive for executing Bitcoin Defi transactions, without having to trust a federated bridge or other centralized entity - BitBox BitBox — an open-source Bitcoin-only hardware wallet, with smooth UX and no compromises on security. Check out Bitbox [dot] swiss and use code BITCOINRAILS to get a discount TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 02:18 Ethan’s Quantum Wakeup 05:18 How Blockstream Enters Post Quantum 09:25 BIP 360 Explained 12:11 How Bitcoin Transitions to PQ 17:35 Choosing Post Quantum Signatures 23:20 How Blockstream Created SHRINCS 27:22 Signature Budgets Importance Explained 41:13 What are SHRIMPS? 44:51 SHRIMPS vs SHRINCS 47:48 Why SLH-DSA Alone Won’t Cut It 49:24 Is a SHRIMPS + SHRINCS BIP Coming? 51:51 Blockstream’s Big Plans for Liquid 59:04 Quantum Readiness Roadmap 01:02:22 Importance of a PQ Recovery Plan 01:05:35 How Long Would a PQ Migration Take 01:11:17 Quantum Watchlist Recommendations

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

23,783 views • 1 month ago

This is why Bitcoin’s real power is going to Be unlocked on Sui👇 Here's a podcast with Robert Zaremba | Native BTCFi 🐝, the co-founder of Native | Bitcoin Yield Hub🐝 「🦑」, on why Sui is going to be the powerhose for BTCfi and how they won the 'Impossible Challenge' by Kostas Kryptos Timestamps: 00:00 Introduction 01:05 The Mission 01:18 The ‘Impossible Challenge’ 02:11 Technical Details and Implementation 05:58 Understanding Bitcoin Nodes 08:14 Types of Bitcoin Nodes 17:18 Trustless Systems and Decentralization 22:29 Challenges in Building Trustless Solutions 23:06 Custodian vs. Trustless Solutions 27:14 Bitcoin and Sui Integration 29:41 Advanced Programmability with Bitcoin and Sui 34:43 Decentralized Layer and Executor 38:01 Future of Trustless Bitcoin Transactions 41:13 Conclusion

This is why Bitcoin’s real power is going to Be unlocked on Sui👇 Here's a podcast with Robert Zaremba | Native BTCFi 🐝, the co-founder of Native | Bitcoin Yield Hub🐝 「🦑」, on why Sui is going to be the powerhose for BTCfi and how they won the 'Impossible Challenge' by Kostas Kryptos Timestamps: 00:00 Introduction 01:05 The Mission 01:18 The ‘Impossible Challenge’ 02:11 Technical Details and Implementation 05:58 Understanding Bitcoin Nodes 08:14 Types of Bitcoin Nodes 17:18 Trustless Systems and Decentralization 22:29 Challenges in Building Trustless Solutions 23:06 Custodian vs. Trustless Solutions 27:14 Bitcoin and Sui Integration 29:41 Advanced Programmability with Bitcoin and Sui 34:43 Decentralized Layer and Executor 38:01 Future of Trustless Bitcoin Transactions 41:13 Conclusion

Sooraj

24,459 views • 1 year ago

Scaling Bitcoin with ZK Rollups with David Seroy and Sims | SLP644 Can ZK Rollups & BitVM scale Bitcoin without soft forks? David Seroy 🏔️ & Simanta Gautam discuss in depth on how ZK proofs enable trust-minimized scaling, batching transactions for better efficiency while keeping Bitcoin secure, and trade-offs when compared to Lightning & sidechains. Timestamps: (00:00) - Intro (01:00) - What are the benefits of ZK rollups for Bitcoin? (03:55) - What is the role of Alpen in helping scale Bitcoin? (09:32) - Are ZK rollups beneficial to Bitcoin? (11:30) - The mechanics of ZK rollups (18:13) - Challenges and limitations of current tech in Bitcoin (23:29) - How does BitVM complement ZK rollups? (31:46) - The experience of using A-BTC for the end user (35:16) - Building the network effects for ZK rollups on Bitcoin (39:11) - Who would be the users of A-BTC? (43:42) - The competitive lending solutions for Bitcoin (46:02) - What are the risks in ZK rollups? (51:52) - What is the ‘Data Availability’ problem? (1:04:21) - What is the future of rollups on Bitcoin?

Scaling Bitcoin with ZK Rollups with David Seroy and Sims | SLP644 Can ZK Rollups & BitVM scale Bitcoin without soft forks? David Seroy 🏔️ & Simanta Gautam discuss in depth on how ZK proofs enable trust-minimized scaling, batching transactions for better efficiency while keeping Bitcoin secure, and trade-offs when compared to Lightning & sidechains. Timestamps: (00:00) - Intro (01:00) - What are the benefits of ZK rollups for Bitcoin? (03:55) - What is the role of Alpen in helping scale Bitcoin? (09:32) - Are ZK rollups beneficial to Bitcoin? (11:30) - The mechanics of ZK rollups (18:13) - Challenges and limitations of current tech in Bitcoin (23:29) - How does BitVM complement ZK rollups? (31:46) - The experience of using A-BTC for the end user (35:16) - Building the network effects for ZK rollups on Bitcoin (39:11) - Who would be the users of A-BTC? (43:42) - The competitive lending solutions for Bitcoin (46:02) - What are the risks in ZK rollups? (51:52) - What is the ‘Data Availability’ problem? (1:04:21) - What is the future of rollups on Bitcoin?

Stephan Livera

17,669 views • 1 year ago

BITCOIN RAILS #34: Bitcoin’s Security & Quantum Risks—and the Future of Satoshi’s Coins | with Jameson Lopp Jameson Lopp “Most people don’t think about security until it’s too late,” says the Casa co-founder and CSO. One of the most prolific thought-leaders in Bitcoin security and privacy, there are few people who understand the nuances of Bitcoin security quite as deeply - not to mention the OPSEC practices required to protect against wrench attacks, for instance, which are rising globally as Bitcoin price increases. More recently, Lopp has turned his attention to mitigating Bitcoin’s quantum vulnerabilities, including market risks associated with quantum-vulnerable Satoshi’s Coins + longer-term strategies for quantum-hardening of Bitcoin addresses long term. In this special episode of Bitcoin Rails, we cover: - Lopp’s experiences designing self-custody products at both BitGo and Casa - The swatting attack he suffered in 2017, and the radical steps he’s taken to secure his home location since - The ‘quantum computing’ challenge for Bitcoin and its impacts on Satoshi’s Coins - How the network may respond to QCs in the face of ossification and why QC preparation may be the hardest governance test the network has ever faced This episode is powered by: - Best In Slot (Best in Slot | BRC2.0 🧑‍🍳), the leading API for Ordinals and BRC20 data aggregation and indexing - Spark (Lightspark), a statechains implementation leading the path towards institutional adoption of Bitcoin-powered payments - Citrea (Citrea), the leading Bitcoin Rollup technology and contributor to the BitVM alliance 📌 Timestamps 00:00 – Intro: Quantum Computing Meets Bitcoin 00:19 – Jameson Lopp on the Bitcoin Rails 00:53 – The Quantum Threat to Bitcoin Security 06:32 – Lopp’s Path into Bitcoin & Security 12:58 – The Swatting Attack During the Block Size Wars 25:28 – Could Quantum Crack Satoshi’s Coins? 43:55 – Announcements & Sponsors Messages 45:30 – Building Bitcoin’s Quantum Resistance 47:00 – QBTC and the Push for Quantum-Resistant Bitcoin 48:43 – Why Changing Bitcoin Is So Hard 51:19 – Email Protocols, Ossification, and Bitcoin’s Future 01:01:53 – A Roadmap for Quantum Resistance

BITCOIN RAILS #34: Bitcoin’s Security & Quantum Risks—and the Future of Satoshi’s Coins | with Jameson Lopp Jameson Lopp “Most people don’t think about security until it’s too late,” says the Casa co-founder and CSO. One of the most prolific thought-leaders in Bitcoin security and privacy, there are few people who understand the nuances of Bitcoin security quite as deeply - not to mention the OPSEC practices required to protect against wrench attacks, for instance, which are rising globally as Bitcoin price increases. More recently, Lopp has turned his attention to mitigating Bitcoin’s quantum vulnerabilities, including market risks associated with quantum-vulnerable Satoshi’s Coins + longer-term strategies for quantum-hardening of Bitcoin addresses long term. In this special episode of Bitcoin Rails, we cover: - Lopp’s experiences designing self-custody products at both BitGo and Casa - The swatting attack he suffered in 2017, and the radical steps he’s taken to secure his home location since - The ‘quantum computing’ challenge for Bitcoin and its impacts on Satoshi’s Coins - How the network may respond to QCs in the face of ossification and why QC preparation may be the hardest governance test the network has ever faced This episode is powered by: - Best In Slot (Best in Slot | BRC2.0 🧑‍🍳), the leading API for Ordinals and BRC20 data aggregation and indexing - Spark (Lightspark), a statechains implementation leading the path towards institutional adoption of Bitcoin-powered payments - Citrea (Citrea), the leading Bitcoin Rollup technology and contributor to the BitVM alliance 📌 Timestamps 00:00 – Intro: Quantum Computing Meets Bitcoin 00:19 – Jameson Lopp on the Bitcoin Rails 00:53 – The Quantum Threat to Bitcoin Security 06:32 – Lopp’s Path into Bitcoin & Security 12:58 – The Swatting Attack During the Block Size Wars 25:28 – Could Quantum Crack Satoshi’s Coins? 43:55 – Announcements & Sponsors Messages 45:30 – Building Bitcoin’s Quantum Resistance 47:00 – QBTC and the Push for Quantum-Resistant Bitcoin 48:43 – Why Changing Bitcoin Is So Hard 51:19 – Email Protocols, Ossification, and Bitcoin’s Future 01:01:53 – A Roadmap for Quantum Resistance

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

14,538 views • 9 months ago

New Episode: Scaling Bitcoin Utility We are back this week with a fresh ABO episode. This time, we have Kieran from Core DAO 🔶 and Jedi blocmates discussing: - Core's Focus on Institutional and Retail Bitcoin Users - The Future of Core: Scaling Bitcoin Utility - Non-Custodial Bitcoin Staking on Core Network /// Full episode also available via offsite links below /// Timestamps: 00:00 Meet Kieran Dennis: Core's Vision for Bitcoin Utility 05:00 Core's Mission: Unlocking Bitcoin's Potential 10:00 Bitcoin DeFi: Combining Security and Scalability 15:00 Non-Custodial Bitcoin Staking on Core Network 20:00 Core's Role in Emerging Markets and Global Adoption 25:00 Bridging Bitcoin and EVM Compatibility 30:00 Core Community: The Power of Global Collaboration 35:00 Real-World Assets on Core: Tokenizing the Future 40:00 Core's Focus on Institutional and Retail Bitcoin Users 45:00 Challenges and Opportunities in Bitcoin DeFi 50:00 The Future of Core: Scaling Bitcoin Utility 55:00 Kieran's Insights: Building Bitcoin for Everyone 01:00:00 Closing Thoughts: Bitcoin DeFi's Path Forward ///

New Episode: Scaling Bitcoin Utility We are back this week with a fresh ABO episode. This time, we have Kieran from Core DAO 🔶 and Jedi blocmates discussing: - Core's Focus on Institutional and Retail Bitcoin Users - The Future of Core: Scaling Bitcoin Utility - Non-Custodial Bitcoin Staking on Core Network /// Full episode also available via offsite links below /// Timestamps: 00:00 Meet Kieran Dennis: Core's Vision for Bitcoin Utility 05:00 Core's Mission: Unlocking Bitcoin's Potential 10:00 Bitcoin DeFi: Combining Security and Scalability 15:00 Non-Custodial Bitcoin Staking on Core Network 20:00 Core's Role in Emerging Markets and Global Adoption 25:00 Bridging Bitcoin and EVM Compatibility 30:00 Core Community: The Power of Global Collaboration 35:00 Real-World Assets on Core: Tokenizing the Future 40:00 Core's Focus on Institutional and Retail Bitcoin Users 45:00 Challenges and Opportunities in Bitcoin DeFi 50:00 The Future of Core: Scaling Bitcoin Utility 55:00 Kieran's Insights: Building Bitcoin for Everyone 01:00:00 Closing Thoughts: Bitcoin DeFi's Path Forward ///

A blocmates Orange 🍊⛓️

12,593 views • 1 year ago

BITCOIN RAILS #50: HISTORY OF SEGWIT & TAPROOT | with Pieter Wuille 🔗 YOUTUBE: A primary maintainer of Bitcoin Core from 2011-2022, Pieter Wuille is arguably the most influential developer in Bitcoin’s history since Satoshi himself. After receiving keys to the Bitcoin codebase from Gavin Andresen, who was tasked with maintaining the codebase by Satoshi Nakamoto, Pieter went on to implement some of Bitcoin’s most dramatic and influential upgrades, including but not limited to: - Implementation of Bitcoin’s Taproot and Segwit upgrades - Implementation of libsecp256k + Bitcoin’s unique encoding structure for the cryptography securing all Bitcoin public/private keys - The first import/export feature for Bitcoin private keys into Bitcoin (now Bitcoin Core) - Development of hierarchical deterministic (HD) wallets, enabling backups via a single seedphrase and paving the way for seedphrases themselves - DER signatures, Miniscript, and so much more A truly special episode of Bitcoin Rails, this is a rare long-form interview with one of the most important historical figures in the arc of Bitcoin’s development. Pieter and I walk through how Bitcoin consensus works in practice, the history of Bitcoin's most critical early developments, and the key role of his good friend, Greg Maxwell, nearly every step of the way. This episode of Bitcoin Rails is powered by: — Best In Slot (Best in Slot | BRC2.0 🧑‍🍳) - the leading API for Ordinals and BRC-20 data aggregation and indexing. — Spark (Lightspark) - a statechains implementation advancing Bitcoin-powered payments. — Citrea (Citrea | Mainnet Live 🍊🍋) - a leading Bitcoin rollup technology and BitVM alliance contributor. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 00:42 Early Days in Bitcoin 01:25 First Contributions to Bitcoin Core 04:38 Challenges and Innovations in Bitcoin Development 06:54 The Hal Finney Challenge 12:16 Bitcoin Core Contributors Back Then 14:18 The Creation of HD Wallets and Seed Phrases 17:47 Greg Maxwell Role and Relationship 21:00 Implementing Libsecp256k1 28:39 Why Did Satoshi Choose ECDSA 33:34 Addressing OpenSSL Issues 40:41 Why Pieter Wrote BIP 66 47:54 BIP 103 Proposal and Initial Reactions 49:57 SegWit Development and Implementation 01:05:39 Taproot's History, Details, and Benefits 01:11:09 Why Taproot Has No Hashed Addresses 01:16:55 Pieter's Thoughts on BitVM and other non-softfork dependent scaling solutions cc Robin Linus 01:18:27 Non-Soft Fork Scaling Solutions 01:23:03 Future Consensus Changes and Challenges 01:25:28 Bitcoin's Miner Centralization and Security Concerns (e.g. MEV) cc Matt Corallo 🟠 01:34:48 Miniscript: Simplifying Bitcoin Script? cc Rob Hamilton

BITCOIN RAILS #50: HISTORY OF SEGWIT & TAPROOT | with Pieter Wuille 🔗 YOUTUBE: A primary maintainer of Bitcoin Core from 2011-2022, Pieter Wuille is arguably the most influential developer in Bitcoin’s history since Satoshi himself. After receiving keys to the Bitcoin codebase from Gavin Andresen, who was tasked with maintaining the codebase by Satoshi Nakamoto, Pieter went on to implement some of Bitcoin’s most dramatic and influential upgrades, including but not limited to: - Implementation of Bitcoin’s Taproot and Segwit upgrades - Implementation of libsecp256k + Bitcoin’s unique encoding structure for the cryptography securing all Bitcoin public/private keys - The first import/export feature for Bitcoin private keys into Bitcoin (now Bitcoin Core) - Development of hierarchical deterministic (HD) wallets, enabling backups via a single seedphrase and paving the way for seedphrases themselves - DER signatures, Miniscript, and so much more A truly special episode of Bitcoin Rails, this is a rare long-form interview with one of the most important historical figures in the arc of Bitcoin’s development. Pieter and I walk through how Bitcoin consensus works in practice, the history of Bitcoin's most critical early developments, and the key role of his good friend, Greg Maxwell, nearly every step of the way. This episode of Bitcoin Rails is powered by: — Best In Slot (Best in Slot | BRC2.0 🧑‍🍳) - the leading API for Ordinals and BRC-20 data aggregation and indexing. — Spark (Lightspark) - a statechains implementation advancing Bitcoin-powered payments. — Citrea (Citrea | Mainnet Live 🍊🍋) - a leading Bitcoin rollup technology and BitVM alliance contributor. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 00:42 Early Days in Bitcoin 01:25 First Contributions to Bitcoin Core 04:38 Challenges and Innovations in Bitcoin Development 06:54 The Hal Finney Challenge 12:16 Bitcoin Core Contributors Back Then 14:18 The Creation of HD Wallets and Seed Phrases 17:47 Greg Maxwell Role and Relationship 21:00 Implementing Libsecp256k1 28:39 Why Did Satoshi Choose ECDSA 33:34 Addressing OpenSSL Issues 40:41 Why Pieter Wrote BIP 66 47:54 BIP 103 Proposal and Initial Reactions 49:57 SegWit Development and Implementation 01:05:39 Taproot's History, Details, and Benefits 01:11:09 Why Taproot Has No Hashed Addresses 01:16:55 Pieter's Thoughts on BitVM and other non-softfork dependent scaling solutions cc Robin Linus 01:18:27 Non-Soft Fork Scaling Solutions 01:23:03 Future Consensus Changes and Challenges 01:25:28 Bitcoin's Miner Centralization and Security Concerns (e.g. MEV) cc Matt Corallo 🟠 01:34:48 Miniscript: Simplifying Bitcoin Script? cc Rob Hamilton

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

43,619 views • 4 months ago

BITCOIN RAILS #36: The Birth Story of ‘OPCAT’ | with proposal co-author Ethan ✨ is on BlueSky✨ Heilman 🐱 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌿 SPOTIFY: As interest in Bitcoin Layer 2s skyrockets, the inclusion of OP_CAT — an opcode enabling concatenation of elements in the Bitcoin stack — has become a key technical upgrade to watch for its potential in the development of trustless bridges. OP_CAT co-author Ethan ✨ is on BlueSky✨ Heilman 🐱 and I sat down to discuss debate around this opcode — including why it’s controversial, the cultural environment shaping its future, and why some worry its broad expressivity could pose “unknown risks” to Bitcoin over time. More recently, Ethan co-authored BIP 360 with Hunter Beast 🕯️ — another controversial proposal aimed at addressing Bitcoin’s quantum vulnerabilities. Suffice it to say, there are few people with Ethan's experience in navigating Bitcoin politics and its shifting governance landscape as we move towards ossification over time. In this episode, we cover: - The origins of OP_CAT and why it was included and removed from early Bitcoin - What makes OP_CAT so powerful (and why that worries some developers) - Cultural shifts in Bitcoin governance as its developer community matures - The ‘great covenants debate’ + OPCAT vs. CTV - The path to BIP 360 and why Bitcoin should be ‘quantum ready’ This episode is powered by: - Best In Slot (Best in Slot | BRC2.0 🧑‍🍳), the leading API for Ordinals and BRC20 data aggregation and indexing - Spark (Lightspark), a statechains implementation leading the path towards institutional adoption of Bitcoin-powered payments - Citrea (Citrea), the leading Bitcoin Rollup technology and contributor to the BitVM alliance 📍 Timestamps 00:00 – Intro 00:45 – Bitcoin Privacy and the OP_CAT Proposal 03:18 – Technical Challenges of Adding New Opcodes 07:37 – Politics and Culture of Bitcoin Upgrades 28:46 – Quantum Computing Meets Bitcoin 37:48 – How Governments View Quantum Risk 39:06 – Breaking Down BIP 360 for Developers 42:03 – Post-Quantum Signature Schemes Explained 45:18 – Trade-offs in Quantum Security for Bitcoin 53:16 – Community Reactions to BIP 360 01:00:23 – The Future of Bitcoin in a Post Quantum World

BITCOIN RAILS #36: The Birth Story of ‘OPCAT’ | with proposal co-author Ethan ✨ is on BlueSky✨ Heilman 🐱 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌿 SPOTIFY: As interest in Bitcoin Layer 2s skyrockets, the inclusion of OP_CAT — an opcode enabling concatenation of elements in the Bitcoin stack — has become a key technical upgrade to watch for its potential in the development of trustless bridges. OP_CAT co-author Ethan ✨ is on BlueSky✨ Heilman 🐱 and I sat down to discuss debate around this opcode — including why it’s controversial, the cultural environment shaping its future, and why some worry its broad expressivity could pose “unknown risks” to Bitcoin over time. More recently, Ethan co-authored BIP 360 with Hunter Beast 🕯️ — another controversial proposal aimed at addressing Bitcoin’s quantum vulnerabilities. Suffice it to say, there are few people with Ethan's experience in navigating Bitcoin politics and its shifting governance landscape as we move towards ossification over time. In this episode, we cover: - The origins of OP_CAT and why it was included and removed from early Bitcoin - What makes OP_CAT so powerful (and why that worries some developers) - Cultural shifts in Bitcoin governance as its developer community matures - The ‘great covenants debate’ + OPCAT vs. CTV - The path to BIP 360 and why Bitcoin should be ‘quantum ready’ This episode is powered by: - Best In Slot (Best in Slot | BRC2.0 🧑‍🍳), the leading API for Ordinals and BRC20 data aggregation and indexing - Spark (Lightspark), a statechains implementation leading the path towards institutional adoption of Bitcoin-powered payments - Citrea (Citrea), the leading Bitcoin Rollup technology and contributor to the BitVM alliance 📍 Timestamps 00:00 – Intro 00:45 – Bitcoin Privacy and the OP_CAT Proposal 03:18 – Technical Challenges of Adding New Opcodes 07:37 – Politics and Culture of Bitcoin Upgrades 28:46 – Quantum Computing Meets Bitcoin 37:48 – How Governments View Quantum Risk 39:06 – Breaking Down BIP 360 for Developers 42:03 – Post-Quantum Signature Schemes Explained 45:18 – Trade-offs in Quantum Security for Bitcoin 53:16 – Community Reactions to BIP 360 01:00:23 – The Future of Bitcoin in a Post Quantum World

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

13,231 views • 9 months ago

Michael Saylor: #Bitcoin 'Gold Rush' 2024-2034: The era of mass adoption is here. I had the chance to sit down with Michael Saylor to discuss the success of the spot Bitcoin ETFs, why our money is toxic, the ideal form of government, building companies on the network and why Bitcoin is for everyone. Timecodes: (00:00) Bitcoin Atlantis in Madeira, Portugal (00:27) Success of Spot Bitcoin ETF launch (3:00)Spot Bitcoin ETF vs. S&P 500 Index ETFs (8:53) Are the ETFs a 'sellout' to Wall Street? (11:45) Bear market lesson (16:26) "Money is toxic" (22:22) What is the role of government and money? (31:05) Why does power centralize? (36:30) Will Bitcoin be hoarded? (45:00) Bitcoin as a cryptographic trust network (54:29) Building businesses on Bitcoin (59:39) Lightning Round (1:02:39) Spreading knowledge globally (1:07:00) Are some born for greatness? Thank you to our lead sponsor (NASDAQ: $BTDR) → and promotional sponsors → Coinkite + The Bitcoin Conference + CrowdHealth + The Bitcoin Way + Fountain

Michael Saylor: #Bitcoin 'Gold Rush' 2024-2034: The era of mass adoption is here. I had the chance to sit down with Michael Saylor to discuss the success of the spot Bitcoin ETFs, why our money is toxic, the ideal form of government, building companies on the network and why Bitcoin is for everyone. Timecodes: (00:00) Bitcoin Atlantis in Madeira, Portugal (00:27) Success of Spot Bitcoin ETF launch (3:00)Spot Bitcoin ETF vs. S&P 500 Index ETFs (8:53) Are the ETFs a 'sellout' to Wall Street? (11:45) Bear market lesson (16:26) "Money is toxic" (22:22) What is the role of government and money? (31:05) Why does power centralize? (36:30) Will Bitcoin be hoarded? (45:00) Bitcoin as a cryptographic trust network (54:29) Building businesses on Bitcoin (59:39) Lightning Round (1:02:39) Spreading knowledge globally (1:07:00) Are some born for greatness? Thank you to our lead sponsor (NASDAQ: $BTDR) → and promotional sponsors → Coinkite + The Bitcoin Conference + CrowdHealth + The Bitcoin Way + Fountain

Natalie Brunell ⚡️

388,839 views • 2 years ago

BITCOIN RAILS #43: A HISTORY OF “SPAM” on BITCOIN | with Peter Todd 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌿 SPOTIFY: “You cannot prevent arbitrary data from being published in Bitcoin transactions. Even at the consensus level…It’s mathematically impossible.” Legendary Bitcoin contributor since 2009 and self-described "weirdo with a fine arts degree," Peter Todd joins me to unpack the endless wars over Bitcoin's "true purpose," his pioneering work putting "spam" on the blockchain, and why he believes attempts to filter transactions are just “silly.” In this episode, we get deep into the history of using Bitcoin for data storage - which goes back, at least, to the development of Namecoin in 2011. Relatedly, we cover the history and long-fought governance battles around OP_RETURN, relay policy, and our community's evolving definitions of "arbitrary data. Suffice it to say, the Filter Wars of 2024/25 are not new... they are simply one battle in a decade+ war we unpack in detail in this context-rich episode of Bitcoin Rails. In more detail, this episode covers: - The development of Open Time Stamps + Bitcoin's use in validating election data and beyond. - OPRETURN battles of the early days... and how its use has evolved over the past decade. - Why Bitcoin Core "should not try to censor transactions" and the "performance art project" (Libre Relay) that shows why. - Bitcoin as a "replicated database" and why blockchains may legitimately be useful outside of sound money. - Why preventing arbitrary data on Bitcoin is "mathematically impossible" ...and trying to stop it is only distracting us from "more important" efforts, like the Great Consensus Cleanup Antoine Poinsot. This episode of Bitcoin Rails is powered by: - Best In Slot (Best in Slot | BRC2.0 🧑‍🍳) — the leading API for Ordinals and BRC-20 data aggregation and indexing. - Spark (Lightspark) — a statechains implementation advancing Bitcoin-powered payments. - Citrea (Citrea | Mainnet Live 🍊🍋) — the leading Bitcoin rollup technology and BitVM alliance contributor. Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 01:19 Bitcoin Early Days 03:44 OpenTimestamps Project 12:22 Governance and Bitcoin Protocol Debates 26:36 The Blockchain Use Case Argument 35:46 Transaction Version Numbers and Standardization 38:30 Preventing Exploits and DDoS Attacks 40:10 Relay Policies and Economic Decisions 42:00 The Taproot Annex and OP_RETURN 45:07 Libre Relay 01:01:18 Future of Bitcoin and Soft Fork Proposals

BITCOIN RAILS #43: A HISTORY OF “SPAM” on BITCOIN | with Peter Todd 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌿 SPOTIFY: “You cannot prevent arbitrary data from being published in Bitcoin transactions. Even at the consensus level…It’s mathematically impossible.” Legendary Bitcoin contributor since 2009 and self-described "weirdo with a fine arts degree," Peter Todd joins me to unpack the endless wars over Bitcoin's "true purpose," his pioneering work putting "spam" on the blockchain, and why he believes attempts to filter transactions are just “silly.” In this episode, we get deep into the history of using Bitcoin for data storage - which goes back, at least, to the development of Namecoin in 2011. Relatedly, we cover the history and long-fought governance battles around OP_RETURN, relay policy, and our community's evolving definitions of "arbitrary data. Suffice it to say, the Filter Wars of 2024/25 are not new... they are simply one battle in a decade+ war we unpack in detail in this context-rich episode of Bitcoin Rails. In more detail, this episode covers: - The development of Open Time Stamps + Bitcoin's use in validating election data and beyond. - OPRETURN battles of the early days... and how its use has evolved over the past decade. - Why Bitcoin Core "should not try to censor transactions" and the "performance art project" (Libre Relay) that shows why. - Bitcoin as a "replicated database" and why blockchains may legitimately be useful outside of sound money. - Why preventing arbitrary data on Bitcoin is "mathematically impossible" ...and trying to stop it is only distracting us from "more important" efforts, like the Great Consensus Cleanup Antoine Poinsot. This episode of Bitcoin Rails is powered by: - Best In Slot (Best in Slot | BRC2.0 🧑‍🍳) — the leading API for Ordinals and BRC-20 data aggregation and indexing. - Spark (Lightspark) — a statechains implementation advancing Bitcoin-powered payments. - Citrea (Citrea | Mainnet Live 🍊🍋) — the leading Bitcoin rollup technology and BitVM alliance contributor. Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 01:19 Bitcoin Early Days 03:44 OpenTimestamps Project 12:22 Governance and Bitcoin Protocol Debates 26:36 The Blockchain Use Case Argument 35:46 Transaction Version Numbers and Standardization 38:30 Preventing Exploits and DDoS Attacks 40:10 Relay Policies and Economic Decisions 42:00 The Taproot Annex and OP_RETURN 45:07 Libre Relay 01:01:18 Future of Bitcoin and Soft Fork Proposals

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

10,768 views • 7 months ago

E133: Sam Blackshear - How Libra Sparked the Move Language and Why Sui Is the Real Endgame! Sam Blackshear is the Co-founder and CTO of MystenLabs.sui , the company behind the Sui, and the Creator of the Move programming language that's revolutionizing smart contract development. Timestamps: 0:00 Introduction 1:54 Partnerships: Jupiter, KAST (old), , Sui, Mantle, Forza! BTC 2:44 The Power of Preparation 5:14 Discipline Behind the Podcast 6:27 Translating Thought Into Code 8:19 Who is Sam Blackshear? 9:27 Choosing What Truly Matters 10:25 Self-Custody with Trezor 11:18 Crypto vs. AI Thinking 12:28 The Power of Support 16:04 From Court Dreams to Reality 17:55 Challenging the Limits of Code 22:52 Chose Learning Over a Job 24:09 The Internship That Changed Everything 27:35 PhD Skills Meet Facebook 29:05 Entering Crypto Through Facebook 32:15 Why Libra Needed Move 33:42 Solving Scarcity in Code 36:37 Bitcoin & Ethereum Mistakes 38:45 Creating a New Language 41:41 Problem-Driven Innovation 44:47 Avoiding Analysis Paralysis 48:11 What is Unstructured Thinking? 50:50 Why Unstructured Thinking Works 53:14 Future of Crypto Protocols 54:21 Why Move is the Best Programming Language 55:00 What is the Sui Network? 56:25 What Makes Sui Different? 57:05 Why is Sui The Best Blockchain? 59:05 Managing Energy Long-Term 1:01:02 Satisfaction Without Closure 1:03:37 90% Love, 10% Grind 1:05:37 Mental State of Surfing 1:06:47 Non-Consensus Beliefs 1:07:34 What is Memory Safety? 1:09:07 What Was the Equifax Hack? 1:10:53 Rethinking Software Safety 1:12:00 Right Dose of Regulation 1:13:00 Biggest Prediction for the Next 24 Months? 1:14:02 Scaling Crypto Developers 1:16:07 Concluding Remarks

E133: Sam Blackshear - How Libra Sparked the Move Language and Why Sui Is the Real Endgame! Sam Blackshear is the Co-founder and CTO of MystenLabs.sui , the company behind the Sui, and the Creator of the Move programming language that's revolutionizing smart contract development. Timestamps: 0:00 Introduction 1:54 Partnerships: Jupiter, KAST (old), , Sui, Mantle, Forza! BTC 2:44 The Power of Preparation 5:14 Discipline Behind the Podcast 6:27 Translating Thought Into Code 8:19 Who is Sam Blackshear? 9:27 Choosing What Truly Matters 10:25 Self-Custody with Trezor 11:18 Crypto vs. AI Thinking 12:28 The Power of Support 16:04 From Court Dreams to Reality 17:55 Challenging the Limits of Code 22:52 Chose Learning Over a Job 24:09 The Internship That Changed Everything 27:35 PhD Skills Meet Facebook 29:05 Entering Crypto Through Facebook 32:15 Why Libra Needed Move 33:42 Solving Scarcity in Code 36:37 Bitcoin & Ethereum Mistakes 38:45 Creating a New Language 41:41 Problem-Driven Innovation 44:47 Avoiding Analysis Paralysis 48:11 What is Unstructured Thinking? 50:50 Why Unstructured Thinking Works 53:14 Future of Crypto Protocols 54:21 Why Move is the Best Programming Language 55:00 What is the Sui Network? 56:25 What Makes Sui Different? 57:05 Why is Sui The Best Blockchain? 59:05 Managing Energy Long-Term 1:01:02 Satisfaction Without Closure 1:03:37 90% Love, 10% Grind 1:05:37 Mental State of Surfing 1:06:47 Non-Consensus Beliefs 1:07:34 What is Memory Safety? 1:09:07 What Was the Equifax Hack? 1:10:53 Rethinking Software Safety 1:12:00 Right Dose of Regulation 1:13:00 Biggest Prediction for the Next 24 Months? 1:14:02 Scaling Crypto Developers 1:16:07 Concluding Remarks

MR SHIFT 🦁

164,259 views • 10 months ago

BITCOIN RAILS #41 | Bitcoin Native Staking: When Trust Becomes the Bottleneck | with Babylon founder David Tse 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌿 SPOTIFY: “99% of Bitcoin is held idle, not because of lack of interest, but because of lack of trust.” Not long after Ordinals (and BRC20) revitalized the “Bitcoin DeFi” narrative, Babylon seemingly leapt onto the scene with what felt like overnight success – locking several billion dollars of TVL in its “trustless Bitcoin staking” protocol. With some of the most interesting advisors and contributors in the space (...seriously, what other projects can claim both domo and яobin linus as collaborators?), Babylon quickly became a “BTC-Fi” Goliath – converting both Bitcoin Season 2 types and formerly staunch ETH maxis alike. In this episode, I sit down with creator David Tse to get the protocol's birth story - and learn how POS staking became the first truly trustless Bitcoin DeFi application in the world. In this episode, we cover: - Why smaller POS chains need better security… and how Bitcoin liquidity may be the answer to securing experimental chains in smaller ecosystems - How David’s former experiences in the Cosmos ecosystem informed the core thesis of using Bitcoin to secure smaller chains - A quick breakdown of Babylon’s staking architecture - and what exactly makes it “trustless” - Babylon’s relationship with BitVM, and the team’s lesser-known contributions to both BitVM2 and BitVM3 (Fun Fact: David Tse is яobin linus's PhD advisor at Stanford 🧑‍🎓) - Why Bitcoiners didn’t want to stake their Bitcoin for yield until now... and how the "trustlessness" thesis is already panning out (with 1 whale dropping a whopping 10K Bitcoin in the protocol just a few months back!) Bitcoin Rails is powered by: - Best In Slot (Best in Slot | BRC2.0 🧑‍🍳) — the leading API for Ordinals and BRC-20 data aggregation and indexing. - Spark (Lightspark) — a Statechains implementation advancing Bitcoin-powered payments. - Citrea (Citrea) — the leading Bitcoin rollup technology and BitVM alliance contributor. 📌 Timestamps 00:00 Intro 00:38 Bitcoin++ Insights 01:52 David’s Background and Information Theory 05:34 Journey into Bitcoin and Blockchain 07:34 Scaling Bitcoin with Prism Protocol 10:38 Babylon and Cosmos Ecosystem 13:51 Bitcoin Staking and Security Mechanisms 24:49 The Importance of Reputation in Crypto 25:51 Partners and Announcements Break 27:25 Profile of Babylon Stakers 29:17 The Grand Vision for Babylon 32:40 Garbled Circuits and Secret Revelation 44:05 Trustless Bitcoin Vaults and Future Prospects

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

15,937 views • 7 months ago

BITCOIN RAILS #38: Two Forces That Could Break Bitcoin: AI vs Quantum I with Martin Shkreli 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌿 SPOTIFY: A couple months ago, I co-hosted an X space with LayerTwo Labs re: “Should Bitcoiners care about quantum computing?” You can imagine our surprise when (in?)famous tech investor Martin Shkreli arrived to share that he’s been researching this very question for years… and dropped that he’s been personally considering raising funds to hire a team of mathematicians to hack Satoshi’s Coins. In this episode, Martin and I explore the limits of Bitcoin’s security model and the two forces he believes could potentially challenge it: a computational path driven by advances in quantum hardware, and/or a mathematical path fueled by AI-assisted discovery. This interview additionally shares takes on: - Why hacking Bitcoin would be the "ultimate" mathematical achievement—and why hacking Satoshi’s coins should be considered a “bug bounty” for Bitcoin - Why quantum may be more problematic for Bitcoin than for the traditional tech world (e.g. why quantum doesn’t likely threaten NVIDIA) - The little known history of Bitcoin’s “overflow bug” (yup, Bitcoin *has* been hacked before… an exploit corrected by hard fork). - And of course, why mathematicians do their deepest work in prison 😉 As always, this episode of Bitcoin Rails can be viewed on YouTube or Spotify via the link available in my bio—and is brought to you with the help of my incredible partners: - Best In Slot (Best in Slot | BRC2.0 🧑‍🍳) – the leading API for Ordinals and BRC20 data aggregation and indexing - Spark (Lightspark) – a statechains implementation leading the path towards institutional adoption of Bitcoin-powered payments - Citrea (Citrea) – the leading Bitcoin rollup technology and contributor to the BitVM alliance 📷 Timestamps 00:00 Intro 02:57 Quantum Supremacy and Google’s Breakthroughs 05:02 Bitcoin’s Cryptographic Vulnerabilities 08:24 Studying Math and Cryptography Behind Bars 20:04 Governance and the Culture of Bitcoin Development 26:29 The Future of Quantum and AI in Cryptography 37:42 Hardware Challenges and Fidelity in Quantum 47:57 Game Theory and the Quantum Race 01:04:08 Bitcoin Recovery and the Quantum Security Question 01:08:38 Mathematical Challenges in Breaking Cryptography 01:15:08 The Role of AI in Future Mathematical Breakthroughs

BITCOIN RAILS #38: Two Forces That Could Break Bitcoin: AI vs Quantum I with Martin Shkreli 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌿 SPOTIFY: A couple months ago, I co-hosted an X space with LayerTwo Labs re: “Should Bitcoiners care about quantum computing?” You can imagine our surprise when (in?)famous tech investor Martin Shkreli arrived to share that he’s been researching this very question for years… and dropped that he’s been personally considering raising funds to hire a team of mathematicians to hack Satoshi’s Coins. In this episode, Martin and I explore the limits of Bitcoin’s security model and the two forces he believes could potentially challenge it: a computational path driven by advances in quantum hardware, and/or a mathematical path fueled by AI-assisted discovery. This interview additionally shares takes on: - Why hacking Bitcoin would be the "ultimate" mathematical achievement—and why hacking Satoshi’s coins should be considered a “bug bounty” for Bitcoin - Why quantum may be more problematic for Bitcoin than for the traditional tech world (e.g. why quantum doesn’t likely threaten NVIDIA) - The little known history of Bitcoin’s “overflow bug” (yup, Bitcoin has been hacked before… an exploit corrected by hard fork). - And of course, why mathematicians do their deepest work in prison 😉 As always, this episode of Bitcoin Rails can be viewed on YouTube or Spotify via the link available in my bio—and is brought to you with the help of my incredible partners: - Best In Slot (Best in Slot | BRC2.0 🧑‍🍳) – the leading API for Ordinals and BRC20 data aggregation and indexing - Spark (Lightspark) – a statechains implementation leading the path towards institutional adoption of Bitcoin-powered payments - Citrea (Citrea) – the leading Bitcoin rollup technology and contributor to the BitVM alliance 📷 Timestamps 00:00 Intro 02:57 Quantum Supremacy and Google’s Breakthroughs 05:02 Bitcoin’s Cryptographic Vulnerabilities 08:24 Studying Math and Cryptography Behind Bars 20:04 Governance and the Culture of Bitcoin Development 26:29 The Future of Quantum and AI in Cryptography 37:42 Hardware Challenges and Fidelity in Quantum 47:57 Game Theory and the Quantum Race 01:04:08 Bitcoin Recovery and the Quantum Security Question 01:08:38 Mathematical Challenges in Breaking Cryptography 01:15:08 The Role of AI in Future Mathematical Breakthroughs

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

62,881 views • 8 months ago

Mysten Labs Co Founder says $SUI will unlock 5%-10% of #bitcoin liquidity 'at scale'. "I think Hashi gives the minimal trust assumptions required for an institution."

Mysten Labs Co Founder says $SUI will unlock 5%-10% of #bitcoin liquidity 'at scale'. "I think Hashi gives the minimal trust assumptions required for an institution."

Altcoin Daily

35,269 views • 2 months ago

Is Bitcoin The Arcane? New episode with Lyn Alden hosted by David Seroy 🏔️ SPOTIFY: ⁠⁠⁠⁠ APPLE: ⁠⁠⁠⁠ YOUTUBE: ⁠⁠⁠⁠ THANKS TO OUR SPONSORS: ALPEN LABS: ⁠⁠⁠⁠ Chapters 00:00 Exploring Arcane: A Masterpiece of Animation 06:39 Thematic Depth: Real-World Parallels in Arcane 12:53 Navigating Burnout: The Balance of Creativity and Work 20:52 Macro Insights: Understanding the Current Economic Landscape 25:40 Bitcoin's Evolution: Balancing Value and Protocol Integrity 39:56 Covenant Changes and Developer Perspectives 43:04 The Evolution of Technical Leadership in Bitcoin 47:13 Exploring BitVM and Technical Constraints 53:23 Programmability and Expressivity in Bitcoin 57:54 User Experience and Self-Sovereignty in Bitcoin 01:03:28 Market Signals and the Future of Bitcoin 01:07:41 The Viability of Decentralized Stablecoins

Is Bitcoin The Arcane? New episode with Lyn Alden hosted by David Seroy 🏔️ SPOTIFY: ⁠⁠⁠⁠ APPLE: ⁠⁠⁠⁠ YOUTUBE: ⁠⁠⁠⁠ THANKS TO OUR SPONSORS: ALPEN LABS: ⁠⁠⁠⁠ Chapters 00:00 Exploring Arcane: A Masterpiece of Animation 06:39 Thematic Depth: Real-World Parallels in Arcane 12:53 Navigating Burnout: The Balance of Creativity and Work 20:52 Macro Insights: Understanding the Current Economic Landscape 25:40 Bitcoin's Evolution: Balancing Value and Protocol Integrity 39:56 Covenant Changes and Developer Perspectives 43:04 The Evolution of Technical Leadership in Bitcoin 47:13 Exploring BitVM and Technical Constraints 53:23 Programmability and Expressivity in Bitcoin 57:54 User Experience and Self-Sovereignty in Bitcoin 01:03:28 Market Signals and the Future of Bitcoin 01:07:41 The Viability of Decentralized Stablecoins

Strata

47,803 views • 1 year ago

🚈 BITCOIN RAILS EPISODE 2: "OP_CAT IS GOOD FOR EVERYONE" with #ICP and Ordinals builder Bob Bodily, PhD 👋 | #BTC #ETH #ICP 🧙🏽‍♂️ One of the most beloved educators of the "Bitcoin Renaissance," Bob and I chat about the possibilities -and limitations - of proposed L2 tech, including: —why the Lightning Network is not enough + proposed solutions for programmable Bitcoin —liquidity fragmention on Bitcoin metaprotocols + the need for interoperability —Bob & Isabel's shared history with ckBTC... and the underrated influence of ICP in the Bitcoin L2 space —who will realistically benefit from ZKP/BitVM style solutions (and who will not) —why OP_CAT is "good for everyone," and probably Bob's favorite Bitcoin Improvement Proposal We hope you enjoy this special episode of Bitcoin Rails! YOUTUBE EPISODE IN BIO 🎉 0:00 Intro 1:26 How Bob Moved To Bitcoin L2s 3:30 Internet Computer Protocol (ICP): Interoperability with any chain 5:40 What’s your definition of an L2? 7:19 Lightning is the only “real” L2 right now 10:00 What makes DeFi on Bitcoin so hard? 11:34 Runes is a fantastic token standard 14:25 Why are there so many Bitcoin metaprotocols? 17:16: Which Bitcoin L2s will win? 20:00 Prongs of the ideal Bitcoin L2 22:00 Real Bitcoin rollups are a problem 23:00 OP_CAT is good for everyone 24:15 The limitations of BitVM 26:30 CAT and transaction introspection 28:00 Fractal and the CAT20 token standard 31:50 Even OP_CAT is not the silver bullet 35:05 Do we build L2s, or just upgrade L1? 36:41 How CAT helps lightning 38:40 A message for the maxi devs

🚈 BITCOIN RAILS EPISODE 2: "OP_CAT IS GOOD FOR EVERYONE" with #ICP and Ordinals builder Bob Bodily, PhD 👋 | #BTC #ETH #ICP 🧙🏽‍♂️ One of the most beloved educators of the "Bitcoin Renaissance," Bob and I chat about the possibilities -and limitations - of proposed L2 tech, including: —why the Lightning Network is not enough + proposed solutions for programmable Bitcoin —liquidity fragmention on Bitcoin metaprotocols + the need for interoperability —Bob & Isabel's shared history with ckBTC... and the underrated influence of ICP in the Bitcoin L2 space —who will realistically benefit from ZKP/BitVM style solutions (and who will not) —why OP_CAT is "good for everyone," and probably Bob's favorite Bitcoin Improvement Proposal We hope you enjoy this special episode of Bitcoin Rails! YOUTUBE EPISODE IN BIO 🎉 0:00 Intro 1:26 How Bob Moved To Bitcoin L2s 3:30 Internet Computer Protocol (ICP): Interoperability with any chain 5:40 What’s your definition of an L2? 7:19 Lightning is the only “real” L2 right now 10:00 What makes DeFi on Bitcoin so hard? 11:34 Runes is a fantastic token standard 14:25 Why are there so many Bitcoin metaprotocols? 17:16: Which Bitcoin L2s will win? 20:00 Prongs of the ideal Bitcoin L2 22:00 Real Bitcoin rollups are a problem 23:00 OP_CAT is good for everyone 24:15 The limitations of BitVM 26:30 CAT and transaction introspection 28:00 Fractal and the CAT20 token standard 31:50 Even OP_CAT is not the silver bullet 35:05 Do we build L2s, or just upgrade L1? 36:41 How CAT helps lightning 38:40 A message for the maxi devs

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

20,513 views • 1 year ago

BITCOIN RAILS EPISODE #28: ORANGE PILLING CRYPTO WITH WIZARDS & CATS | with Udi Wertheimer One of the most influential voices in “Bitcoin Season II,” Udi Wertheimer is one of the most controversial and, perhaps, most misunderstood figures in the Bitcoin community broadly. A self-identified “survivor” of Bitcoin maximalism, Udi’s critiques of Bitcoin-only tribalism – and the suppression of nuanced discussion that arises as a result – made him the perfect spokesperson for post-Ordinals Bitcoiners looking for someone to represent their “Bitcoin-first” rather than “Bitcoin-only” views. Inspired by Ordinals, Udi and partner Eric Wall founded Taproot Wizards – one of the most unique and enigmatic companies in Bitcoin – with a broad mandate to “onboard crypto users to Bitcoin… by any means necessary.” From launching two of the most popular Ordinals collections in the world – to campaigning for progressive Bitcoin opcodes (i.e. CAT) – Udi and the Wizards relentlessly orange pill the most maxi-neglected low-hanging fruit… non-Bitcoin crypto users. As always, you can view this episode on YouTube or Spotify via the linktree in my bio. This episode is powered by Best In Slot (Best in Slot | BRC2.0 🧑‍🍳), the leading API for Ordinals and BRC20 data aggregation and indexing—as well as Citrea (Citrea), a leading 'Bitcoin Rollup' technology and core contributor to the BitVM alliance. Timestamps: 00:20 Udi: The Bitcoin Maxi “Cult Survivor” 03:10 Maxis cheering on Gary Gensler 06:30 Ordinals: Tokens arriving on Bitcoin 08:55 How NFTs helped encourage Bitcoin self-custody 11:40 Making Bitcoin cool again for crypto people 13:55 Why did Udi start the Taproot Wizards company? 16:00 The Wizards’ pitch to investors 18:50 “Successful fundraising” is an oxymoron 20:40 Why did Ryan Dell join the Wizards? 24:00 Taproot Wizards is not strictly an “L2” company 27:00 What went into the Taproot Wizards NFT launch 29:30 The NFT auction and inspiring Solana user participation 32:50 The importance of launching during the bear market 34:30 Every active crypto trader has Phantom wallet 37:10 Cultural differences between Bitcoin, crypto and different wallet users 40:45 Why Udi was impressed by 43:30 Udi is NOT a Runes fan 45:40 Don't be too defeatist about Runes’ failure 47:40 Championing OP_CAT and the Bitcoin Core power vacuum 49:40 Why Bitcoin Core has “failed” 51:35 Bitcoin Core’s weakness around OP-Return drama 55:00 How will Bitcoin devs get things done? 57:40 Udi’s OP_CAT political lobbying effort 01:00:20 Why Udi thinks CTV is unlikely to pass 01:03:40 Robin Linus wanted OP_CAT: What happened? 01:05:30 Were Taproot Wizards a blessing or a curse for OP_CAT?

BITCOIN RAILS EPISODE #28: ORANGE PILLING CRYPTO WITH WIZARDS & CATS | with Udi Wertheimer One of the most influential voices in “Bitcoin Season II,” Udi Wertheimer is one of the most controversial and, perhaps, most misunderstood figures in the Bitcoin community broadly. A self-identified “survivor” of Bitcoin maximalism, Udi’s critiques of Bitcoin-only tribalism – and the suppression of nuanced discussion that arises as a result – made him the perfect spokesperson for post-Ordinals Bitcoiners looking for someone to represent their “Bitcoin-first” rather than “Bitcoin-only” views. Inspired by Ordinals, Udi and partner Eric Wall founded Taproot Wizards – one of the most unique and enigmatic companies in Bitcoin – with a broad mandate to “onboard crypto users to Bitcoin… by any means necessary.” From launching two of the most popular Ordinals collections in the world – to campaigning for progressive Bitcoin opcodes (i.e. CAT) – Udi and the Wizards relentlessly orange pill the most maxi-neglected low-hanging fruit… non-Bitcoin crypto users. As always, you can view this episode on YouTube or Spotify via the linktree in my bio. This episode is powered by Best In Slot (Best in Slot | BRC2.0 🧑‍🍳), the leading API for Ordinals and BRC20 data aggregation and indexing—as well as Citrea (Citrea), a leading 'Bitcoin Rollup' technology and core contributor to the BitVM alliance. Timestamps: 00:20 Udi: The Bitcoin Maxi “Cult Survivor” 03:10 Maxis cheering on Gary Gensler 06:30 Ordinals: Tokens arriving on Bitcoin 08:55 How NFTs helped encourage Bitcoin self-custody 11:40 Making Bitcoin cool again for crypto people 13:55 Why did Udi start the Taproot Wizards company? 16:00 The Wizards’ pitch to investors 18:50 “Successful fundraising” is an oxymoron 20:40 Why did Ryan Dell join the Wizards? 24:00 Taproot Wizards is not strictly an “L2” company 27:00 What went into the Taproot Wizards NFT launch 29:30 The NFT auction and inspiring Solana user participation 32:50 The importance of launching during the bear market 34:30 Every active crypto trader has Phantom wallet 37:10 Cultural differences between Bitcoin, crypto and different wallet users 40:45 Why Udi was impressed by 43:30 Udi is NOT a Runes fan 45:40 Don't be too defeatist about Runes’ failure 47:40 Championing OP_CAT and the Bitcoin Core power vacuum 49:40 Why Bitcoin Core has “failed” 51:35 Bitcoin Core’s weakness around OP-Return drama 55:00 How will Bitcoin devs get things done? 57:40 Udi’s OP_CAT political lobbying effort 01:00:20 Why Udi thinks CTV is unlikely to pass 01:03:40 Robin Linus wanted OP_CAT: What happened? 01:05:30 Were Taproot Wizards a blessing or a curse for OP_CAT?

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

16,524 views • 11 months ago

Over $1 trillion worth of Bitcoin has been sitting dormant—until now Built for institutions holding idle Bitcoin, Hashi from Sui $SUI Sui removes the barriers so they can participate in Bitcoin DeFi without the usual constraints. Join Grayscale's Head of Research Zach Pandl Zach Pandl and Sui's Adeniyi.sui as they discuss how Sui is powering Bitcoin finance infrastructure.

Over $1 trillion worth of Bitcoin has been sitting dormant—until now Built for institutions holding idle Bitcoin, Hashi from Sui $SUI Sui removes the barriers so they can participate in Bitcoin DeFi without the usual constraints. Join Grayscale's Head of Research Zach Pandl Zach Pandl and Sui's Adeniyi.sui as they discuss how Sui is powering Bitcoin finance infrastructure.

Grayscale

44,896 views • 2 days ago

BITCOIN RAILS #39: The Bull Case for Statechains & Why Big Tech Wants Self-Custody Too | with Lightspark CTO & Spark creator Kevin Hurley 🔗YOUTUBE: 🌿SPOTIFY: It was about four years ago that Facebook’s famous effort at creating its own cryptocurrency and crypto-native payments system (Libra, then Diem) was effectively halted by an unending stream of regulatory scrutiny and compliance blocks. Some leaders of the project went on to create crypto-projects of their own (e.g. SUI and Aptos), however, “Head of Facebook Financial” David Marcus, along with Diem wallet technical lead Kevin Hurley made the key bet that Bitcoin’s decentralized rails were the only in the crypto space likely to be undisrupted by regulatory roadblocks long-term. They went on to create Lightspark - initially designed to make Lightning “usable” by enterprise payments companies - but ultimately came to the conclusion that Lightning alone was not going to scale to 8 billion people globally. After heavy research on scaling solutions for Bitcoin, they eventually developed a “statechains” layer-2 solution of their own Spark – which, since going live, has garnered attention from Ordinals degens to enterprise payments companies alike. In this episode, Kevin Hurley and I get into: — How the Libra/Diem regulatory blocks went down and why these concerns will likely only be addressed by a truly decentralized system like Bitcoin (+ self-custody on the wallets side) — Why Lightspark started building on the Lightning Network (raising more than 2X field leader Lightning Labs⚡️🌐 ), but developed serious concerns about its ability to scale — What a multi-system Bitcoin scaling future might look like: with Lightning as the liquidity provider feeding self-custody friendly systems like Spark, Ark, e-cash systems, and more. —What a multi-system Bitcoin scaling future might look like: with Lightning as the liquidity provider feeding self-custody friendly systems like Spark, Ark, e-cash systems, and more. Bitcoin Rails is powered by: — Best In Slot (Best in Slot | BRC2.0 🧑‍🍳) – the leading API for Ordinals and BRC-20 data aggregation and indexing — Spark (Lightspark) – a Statechains implementation leading the path toward institutional adoption of Bitcoin-powered payments — Citrea (Citrea | Mainnet Live 🍊🍋) – the leading Bitcoin rollup technology and contributor to the BitVM alliance 📌 Timestamps 00:00 Intro 00:26 How Lightspark came to life 03:41 Lessons from Libra and Diem 08:35 Universal Money Addresses and global payments 13:45 How traditional finance is approaching blockchain adoption 33:08 The core challenge of Lightning 37:53 Exploring alternatives: ARC and Statechains 40:18 How Statechains work and their benefits 56:43 The future of Lightning and Spark’s role

BITCOIN RAILS #39: The Bull Case for Statechains & Why Big Tech Wants Self-Custody Too | with Lightspark CTO & Spark creator Kevin Hurley 🔗YOUTUBE: 🌿SPOTIFY: It was about four years ago that Facebook’s famous effort at creating its own cryptocurrency and crypto-native payments system (Libra, then Diem) was effectively halted by an unending stream of regulatory scrutiny and compliance blocks. Some leaders of the project went on to create crypto-projects of their own (e.g. SUI and Aptos), however, “Head of Facebook Financial” David Marcus, along with Diem wallet technical lead Kevin Hurley made the key bet that Bitcoin’s decentralized rails were the only in the crypto space likely to be undisrupted by regulatory roadblocks long-term. They went on to create Lightspark - initially designed to make Lightning “usable” by enterprise payments companies - but ultimately came to the conclusion that Lightning alone was not going to scale to 8 billion people globally. After heavy research on scaling solutions for Bitcoin, they eventually developed a “statechains” layer-2 solution of their own Spark – which, since going live, has garnered attention from Ordinals degens to enterprise payments companies alike. In this episode, Kevin Hurley and I get into: — How the Libra/Diem regulatory blocks went down and why these concerns will likely only be addressed by a truly decentralized system like Bitcoin (+ self-custody on the wallets side) — Why Lightspark started building on the Lightning Network (raising more than 2X field leader Lightning Labs⚡️🌐 ), but developed serious concerns about its ability to scale — What a multi-system Bitcoin scaling future might look like: with Lightning as the liquidity provider feeding self-custody friendly systems like Spark, Ark, e-cash systems, and more. —What a multi-system Bitcoin scaling future might look like: with Lightning as the liquidity provider feeding self-custody friendly systems like Spark, Ark, e-cash systems, and more. Bitcoin Rails is powered by: — Best In Slot (Best in Slot | BRC2.0 🧑‍🍳) – the leading API for Ordinals and BRC-20 data aggregation and indexing — Spark (Lightspark) – a Statechains implementation leading the path toward institutional adoption of Bitcoin-powered payments — Citrea (Citrea | Mainnet Live 🍊🍋) – the leading Bitcoin rollup technology and contributor to the BitVM alliance 📌 Timestamps 00:00 Intro 00:26 How Lightspark came to life 03:41 Lessons from Libra and Diem 08:35 Universal Money Addresses and global payments 13:45 How traditional finance is approaching blockchain adoption 33:08 The core challenge of Lightning 37:53 Exploring alternatives: ARC and Statechains 40:18 How Statechains work and their benefits 56:43 The future of Lightning and Spark’s role

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

25,909 views • 8 months ago