正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Black Forest Labs (Black Forest Labs) co-founder & CEO Robin Rombach (Robin Rombach) says: "Fear-mongering around AI models is only going to lead to them being more closed, & that's ultimately going to slow down AI progress." "Open innovation is good for the world." "Having accessible AI models is...

40,491 次观看 • 25 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

David Friedberg: “AI is the new lightning rod for fear and divisiveness that ultimately breeds compliance and control.” “Peter Thiel said this best. He's like, ‘Look at all the money that's going into AI, there's really only one company that's making any money, and that's Nvidia.’” “Like at this point, the jury's still out. We don't even know what AI is.” “It's sort of like when the internet was happening, everyone thought these fiber optic switch companies were going to make all the money.” “Turns out that was wrong. It was the end applications that made all the money.” “And they competed in many different markets. from Google, to Amazon, to Uber.” “You can go down the list of all the beneficiaries of the core infrastructure technology of the internet that was built out.” “So what is really going on?” Well, AI is the new lightning rod for fear and for divisiveness that ultimately breeds compliance and control.” “Which is where these politicians are trying to drive the populace and the voting conditions in the United States.” “And that's what's going on right now.” “There's a lot of fear about, ‘Putting this data center in my town is gonna do X or Y or Z,’ with no real conversation about the truth of that matter.” “There's a lot of fear about wealth creation being aggregated in the hands of a few when as we saw with the internet, it benefited the many.” “And that fear mongering is a very similar tactic that we've seen in the prior generations where policies were misstated, fear was used, and then voting control allowed folks to come to power that were looking for power.” “So I think it's just the lightning rod at the moment.”

The All-In Podcast

241,146 次观看 • 7 个月前

David Sacks: America needs “a single national standard” in AI to beat China and avoid Woke AI Sacks on E245: “There's a regulatory frenzy happening at the states right now.” “Everyone just seems to be motivated by the imperative to ‘do something’ on AI, even though no one's really sure what that something should be.” “So you've got 50 different states each with their own reporting regime, which is going to be a trap for startups. They've all gotta figure this out about what they're supposed to report on, what the deadlines are, who to report to.” “A single federal standard is the best way to make sure that we do not have Woke AI, that we do not have insanely burdensome regulations that allow China to basically get ahead of us in this AI race, and it's to ensure that we actually have truthful, unbiased AI instead of highly ideological AI.” – According to Polymarket, chances of a National AI Bill in 2025 are VERY LOW, despite a regulation frenzy at the state level. – At the time of taping, there was a ~20% chance. Today it’s significantly lower at 5%. “Here's the good news, it doesn't really matter what I think. The important thing is what President Trump thinks.” “And in his July 23rd speech on AI, he was really clear that there needs to be a single national standard for AI.” “I think the administration ultimately will support this, and I think more Republicans will come on board as they realize what the blue states are doing here is not helpful for conservatives. It's not helpful for having an unbiased information environment.”

The All-In Podcast

103,113 次观看 • 9 个月前

Naval Ravikant: "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us." On E215, Naval broke down his main AI fear: consolidated control enabled by regulatory capture. "If you really think you're going to create God, do you want to put God on a leash with one entity controlling God?" "That to me is the real fear." "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us, 'for our own good.'" "I'm not an AI doomer. I don't think AI is going to end the world. That's a separate conversation." "But, there's this religion that comes along in many faces, which is that, 'Oh, climate change is going to end the world. AI is going to end the world. Asteroid's going to end the world. COVID-19 is going to end the world.' And it just has a way of fixating your attention, right? "It captures everybody's attention at once. So it's a very seductive thing." "And I think in the case of AI, it's really been overplayed by incentive bias. Motivated reasoning by the companies who are ahead and they want to pull up the ladder behind them." "I think they generally believe that there is safety risk, but I think they're motivated to believe in those safety risks and then they pass that along." "But it's kind of a weird position because they have to say, 'Oh, it's so dangerous that you shouldn't just let open-source go at it. And you should let just a few of us work with you on it. But it's not so dangerous that a private company can't own the whole thing.'" "Because if it was truly the Manhattan Project, if they were building nuclear weapons, you wouldn't want one company to own that." "So to me, the real issue boils down to, how do you push AI forward while not having just a very small number of players control the entire thing?"

The All-In Podcast

300,830 次观看 • 1 年前