Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🤔 BOBI WINE is blabbering to a straightforward question whether he supports or opposes the repressive anti-homosexuality law in uganda which he claims targets him! bobi wine describes the law as a “political weapon,” asserting that any statement he makes could be used against him. however, to me, this... explanation falls short, considering his silence during the law's passage and the unanimous support for it from his/out nup party's mps. this situation begs two questions: 𝟏. is our entire nup party complicit, or there is a lack of leadership in addressing internal dissent? 𝟐. as the president of the party, what disciplinary actions has bobi wine take against the homophobic nup parliamentarians who voted for a law that is targeting him and themselves, besides firing the former leader of opposition, Mathias Mpuuga, who misled the entire opposition to vote for the anti-lgbtiq+ law? still when pressed on whether bobi wine would repeal the law if he came to power, his hesitation leaves my eyebrows fully deployed! asserting a commitment to respect all human rights without specifically recognizing lgbtiq+ rights as human rights is not enough. there cannot be true democracy without lgbtiq+rights. as bobi wine sang that “𝐈𝐟 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐡, 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐛𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐥𝐨𝐧𝐞,” why now cower or get excuses that whatever you say about the anti-gay law, it will be used against you? let’s walk our talk! the time has come for ugandan politicians and leaders to unequivocally oppose the egregious anti-homosexuality law. advocating for some rights while remaining ambiguous about lgbtiq+ rights is inconsistent, inexcusable, indefensible, unacceptable, and undermines the principles of democracy, justice and equality. the political exploitation of human rights issues by the opposition and the junta must end. you should either stand for lgbtiq+ rights or stand for hypocrisy, hate, and politics of appeasement. politicians, always be clear and firm on your position when it comes to the queer rights just like it is on other subjects like political and civil rights, good governance, rule of law, corruption, women’s rights, children’s rights… where you don’t blabber. otherwise the chess and checkers politicians are playing is exacerbating marginalization and plight of lgbtiq+ ugandans, which unacceptable!#standupforhumanrights #repealaha2023 #turnoffthehateshow more

justice hunter 🇺🇬🇺🇸

84,674 subscribers

206,411 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Comments

justice hunter 🇺🇬🇺🇸2 years ago

full interview #icymi ⬇️

justice hunter 🇺🇬🇺🇸2 years ago

let me leave this here for my trolls!

justice hunter 🇺🇬🇺🇸2 years ago

almost the same with the bbc interview

LM Dada2 years ago

@HEBobiwine He is consistent with this response but I understand yo frustration coz u want him to speak like a gay rights activist which he is not

justice hunter 🇺🇬🇺🇸2 years ago

@HEBobiwine repeating the same line over and over is not my argument. re-read what i said, please.

Hon.Nsubuga Acksam 🇺🇬🇹🇿 🇰🇪 🇷🇼2 years ago

@HEBobiwine There is no time for such! And don’t divert our struggle to oust the dictator to a mere homo conversation. Homosexuality is not even amongst the top 10 issues pressing the wanaichi here at home. So don’t drag us to your knees

justice hunter 🇺🇬🇺🇸2 years ago

@HEBobiwine what law school did you go to? i want to black list it!

aloysius maximus2 years ago

@HEBobiwine Strategic ambiguity is also a tactic. He is definitely damned if he supports (most Ugandans support the law) & kind of damned if he doesn't (many foreign powers are against the law). He's therefore better off towing the fragile middle ground.

justice hunter 🇺🇬🇺🇸2 years ago

@HEBobiwine so you think ugandans are dense not to understand the vague answers bobi wine gave? should that ambiguity be brought to your other freedoms? let’s not play games when it comes to the question of any right/s.

Mpagi Julius2 years ago

@HEBobiwine I think you are confusing him for a gay rights activist.

justice hunter 🇺🇬🇺🇸2 years ago

@HEBobiwine comprehension!!!!!

Related Videos

.BOBI WINE once again struggles to answer a basic question about his position on the lgbtiq+ question in uganda! it’s factually incorrect & indefensible for bobi to say that he hesitates to give comments on the subject because of the law⁉️ what do you lose to say lgbtq+ rights are human rights, deserving of protection, promotion, and respect 24/7 like any other rights? #repealaha23 #standup4humanrights

.BOBI WINE once again struggles to answer a basic question about his position on the lgbtiq+ question in uganda! it’s factually incorrect & indefensible for bobi to say that he hesitates to give comments on the subject because of the law⁉️ what do you lose to say lgbtq+ rights are human rights, deserving of protection, promotion, and respect 24/7 like any other rights? #repealaha23 #standup4humanrights

justice hunter 🇺🇬🇺🇸

176,829 views • 2 years ago

#URGENT 🇺🇬UGANDA | International Lawyer Calls for Commonwealth Suspension Over Rights Abuses Robert Amsterdam ( Robert Amsterdam ), international counsel for Ugandan opposition leader Bobi Wine, has called for Uganda’s suspension from the Commonwealth, citing “systematic repression and internal colonization” by the Museveni regime. In a forceful statement, Amsterdam condemned ongoing threats to BOBI WINE 's life, declaring: “We are shocked and appalled by the calls to find President Wine ‘dead or alive.’ He has committed no crime other than winning the hearts of the Ugandan people.” He urged international partners and donors to end complicity in Uganda’s human rights violations, invoking the 1991 Harare Declaration and Uganda’s own Constitution as frameworks now being violated. “Uganda today is acting as an outlaw,” he said. “There are sanctions, there are mechanisms — no one should remain complicit.” Context: Bobi Wine (Robert Kyagulanyi) remains Uganda’s leading opposition figure. His party accuses Museveni’s government of election fraud, torture, and political assassinations. #Uganda #BobiWine #HumanRights #Commonwealth #RobertAmsterdam #Museveni #Democracy

#URGENT 🇺🇬UGANDA | International Lawyer Calls for Commonwealth Suspension Over Rights Abuses Robert Amsterdam ( Robert Amsterdam ), international counsel for Ugandan opposition leader Bobi Wine, has called for Uganda’s suspension from the Commonwealth, citing “systematic repression and internal colonization” by the Museveni regime. In a forceful statement, Amsterdam condemned ongoing threats to BOBI WINE 's life, declaring: “We are shocked and appalled by the calls to find President Wine ‘dead or alive.’ He has committed no crime other than winning the hearts of the Ugandan people.” He urged international partners and donors to end complicity in Uganda’s human rights violations, invoking the 1991 Harare Declaration and Uganda’s own Constitution as frameworks now being violated. “Uganda today is acting as an outlaw,” he said. “There are sanctions, there are mechanisms — no one should remain complicit.” Context: Bobi Wine (Robert Kyagulanyi) remains Uganda’s leading opposition figure. His party accuses Museveni’s government of election fraud, torture, and political assassinations. #Uganda #BobiWine #HumanRights #Commonwealth #RobertAmsterdam #Museveni #Democracy

Xtrafrica

18,457 views • 5 months ago

WATCH: National Unity Platform principal BOBI WINE has pledged that if given the mandate to contest for President of Uganda under the NUP banner, he will bring an end to President Museveni’s four-decade rule. Kyagulanyi has reaffirmed his commitment to advocating for a better Uganda grounded in the rule of law, democracy, and the restoration of political prisoners' rights. This follows his official declaration to once again contest for the country’s highest office in the 2026 General Election. #MonitorUpdates 📹 Walugembe David

WATCH: National Unity Platform principal BOBI WINE has pledged that if given the mandate to contest for President of Uganda under the NUP banner, he will bring an end to President Museveni’s four-decade rule. Kyagulanyi has reaffirmed his commitment to advocating for a better Uganda grounded in the rule of law, democracy, and the restoration of political prisoners' rights. This follows his official declaration to once again contest for the country’s highest office in the 2026 General Election. #MonitorUpdates 📹 Walugembe David

Daily Monitor

19,938 views • 1 year ago

.BOBI WINE's BBC Interview: Addressing Controversies 👇🏽 1. Host: You have not been allowed in the UK for a decade b'se of your homophobic lyrics, what changed? why are you allowed in? Bobi: I took responsibility. We grow and transform. 2. Host: Would you repeal the Anti-Homsexuality Law when you become president? Bobi Wine: I would be very cautious 3. Host: Do you support or oppose the law? Bobi: It was brought targeting the opposition 4. Host: But your party National Unity Platform voted in favor of the law in its entirety Bobi: Sure, in my party, I have MPs working with Museveni There was a lot of scapegoating! #StandUp4HumanRights #RepealAHA2023 Photo and Sound credit to BBC.

.BOBI WINE's BBC Interview: Addressing Controversies 👇🏽 1. Host: You have not been allowed in the UK for a decade b'se of your homophobic lyrics, what changed? why are you allowed in? Bobi: I took responsibility. We grow and transform. 2. Host: Would you repeal the Anti-Homsexuality Law when you become president? Bobi Wine: I would be very cautious 3. Host: Do you support or oppose the law? Bobi: It was brought targeting the opposition 4. Host: But your party National Unity Platform voted in favor of the law in its entirety Bobi: Sure, in my party, I have MPs working with Museveni There was a lot of scapegoating! #StandUp4HumanRights #RepealAHA2023 Photo and Sound credit to BBC.

justice hunter 🇺🇬🇺🇸

209,599 views • 2 years ago

“It’s a red line, Mr. President, for my Country to be allegedly accused of genocide when we know that this is a criteria that international law guides. There’s no mechanism that has called for that, and I will not allow for that to be mentioned here in the UN premises and accept that this happens under your watch, Mr. President. I want you to please address this. It’s not an allegation that we will accept.” — Amb. Urujeni addressing the President of UN Human Rights Council after allegations made by the DRC Minister of Human Rights during the 60th Session of the Human Rights Council. UN Human Rights #HRC60

“It’s a red line, Mr. President, for my Country to be allegedly accused of genocide when we know that this is a criteria that international law guides. There’s no mechanism that has called for that, and I will not allow for that to be mentioned here in the UN premises and accept that this happens under your watch, Mr. President. I want you to please address this. It’s not an allegation that we will accept.” — Amb. Urujeni addressing the President of UN Human Rights Council after allegations made by the DRC Minister of Human Rights during the 60th Session of the Human Rights Council. UN Human Rights #HRC60

Rwanda in Geneva

86,931 views • 10 months ago

When the likes of Richard Squirmer, our Attorney General, throw around accusations of fascism and far-right politics at those who wish to reclaim the sovereignty of this country and exit the European Convention on Human Rights, he seems to forget that we have the receipts. His mentor and the great champion of prioritising human rights law over actual English law is Tom Bingham, and he was absolutely explicit about its purpose. In a lecture in Australia he said outright that human rights law is “undemocratic”, “counter-majoritarian”, and designed to prioritise the minority over the majority. I wrote about the usurpation of English law by Bingham here: It’s always useful when these people occasionally tell the truth. We must never forget to keep a record! #DavidStarkey #UKPolitics #HumanRightsLaw #ECHR #BritishSovereignty #TomBingham #RuleOfLaw #BritishConstitution

When the likes of Richard Squirmer, our Attorney General, throw around accusations of fascism and far-right politics at those who wish to reclaim the sovereignty of this country and exit the European Convention on Human Rights, he seems to forget that we have the receipts. His mentor and the great champion of prioritising human rights law over actual English law is Tom Bingham, and he was absolutely explicit about its purpose. In a lecture in Australia he said outright that human rights law is “undemocratic”, “counter-majoritarian”, and designed to prioritise the minority over the majority. I wrote about the usurpation of English law by Bingham here: It’s always useful when these people occasionally tell the truth. We must never forget to keep a record! #DavidStarkey #UKPolitics #HumanRightsLaw #ECHR #BritishSovereignty #TomBingham #RuleOfLaw #BritishConstitution

David Starkey

23,540 views • 4 months ago

Arab leaders are the most hypocritical leaders to exist. The King of Jordan is peaching to the West about ”human rights” in this video. What do you know about "human rights"? In most Arab countries, it is legal to rape your wife. In most Arab countries, women are not considered ”full human beings” by law. In most Arab countries, there is a death penalty for criticizing or leaving Islam. In most Arab countries, there is a death penalty for being gay. In most Arab countries, you go to prison for eating pork or drinking alcohol. This same ”king" who is preaching about ”human rights” imprisons people who criticize him. And yet here he sits, with a firm face, lecturing us on ”human rights.” Keep your side of the street clean first, king.

Arab leaders are the most hypocritical leaders to exist. The King of Jordan is peaching to the West about ”human rights” in this video. What do you know about "human rights"? In most Arab countries, it is legal to rape your wife. In most Arab countries, women are not considered ”full human beings” by law. In most Arab countries, there is a death penalty for criticizing or leaving Islam. In most Arab countries, there is a death penalty for being gay. In most Arab countries, you go to prison for eating pork or drinking alcohol. This same ”king" who is preaching about ”human rights” imprisons people who criticize him. And yet here he sits, with a firm face, lecturing us on ”human rights.” Keep your side of the street clean first, king.

Luai Ahmed

206,813 views • 2 years ago

. Robert Amsterdam , a U.S.-based international lawyer who has been banned from entering Uganda, has openly described the Museveni administration as a “thugocracy.” In an interview on Think Africa, Amsterdam—who recently issued an official statement urging international donors to Uganda to condition their aid on guarantees for the safety of Bobi Wine—strongly criticized the regime’s human rights record. He dismissed claims that President Museveni is capable of ensuring law and order, citing past incidents in which Bobi Wine was tortured, as well as the continued political targeting of Dr. Kizza Besigye. Amsterdam characterized such assurances as disingenuous and unconvincing. Watch as Amsterdam forcefully challenges the Museveni government, followed by my commentary. YouTube -

. Robert Amsterdam , a U.S.-based international lawyer who has been banned from entering Uganda, has openly described the Museveni administration as a “thugocracy.” In an interview on Think Africa, Amsterdam—who recently issued an official statement urging international donors to Uganda to condition their aid on guarantees for the safety of Bobi Wine—strongly criticized the regime’s human rights record. He dismissed claims that President Museveni is capable of ensuring law and order, citing past incidents in which Bobi Wine was tortured, as well as the continued political targeting of Dr. Kizza Besigye. Amsterdam characterized such assurances as disingenuous and unconvincing. Watch as Amsterdam forcefully challenges the Museveni government, followed by my commentary. YouTube -

Mordecai Muriisa ™️

12,602 views • 6 months ago

My heart weeps for our community in #Ghana following the passing of the stringent anti-LGBTQ law a few hours ago. This legislation, one of the most severe in Africa, not only perpetuates the punishment of LGBTQ+ individuals but also criminalises the vital support and advocacy for these communities. It’s a dark day for human rights in Ghana, and my thoughts are with everyone who now faces even more significant challenges in living their truth. As the Director General of Uganda Key Populations Consortium , I’ve witnessed firsthand the power of community and the resilience of those fighting for their right to love and exist freely. The passage of this law is a stark reminder of the battles still ahead in the journey toward equality and justice. Now, more than ever, our brothers and sisters in Ghana need our support and solidarity. We must rally to amplify their voices and challenge this affront to human dignity. The fight for human rights knows no borders, and we stand with the LGBTQ+ community in Ghana, advocating for a world where everyone’s rights are protected and cherished. I urge the global community, leaders, and human rights advocates to join us in this critical moment. Let’s work tirelessly to reverse this regression and reaffirm our commitment to human rights for all, regardless of who they love.

My heart weeps for our community in #Ghana following the passing of the stringent anti-LGBTQ law a few hours ago. This legislation, one of the most severe in Africa, not only perpetuates the punishment of LGBTQ+ individuals but also criminalises the vital support and advocacy for these communities. It’s a dark day for human rights in Ghana, and my thoughts are with everyone who now faces even more significant challenges in living their truth. As the Director General of Uganda Key Populations Consortium , I’ve witnessed firsthand the power of community and the resilience of those fighting for their right to love and exist freely. The passage of this law is a stark reminder of the battles still ahead in the journey toward equality and justice. Now, more than ever, our brothers and sisters in Ghana need our support and solidarity. We must rally to amplify their voices and challenge this affront to human dignity. The fight for human rights knows no borders, and we stand with the LGBTQ+ community in Ghana, advocating for a world where everyone’s rights are protected and cherished. I urge the global community, leaders, and human rights advocates to join us in this critical moment. Let’s work tirelessly to reverse this regression and reaffirm our commitment to human rights for all, regardless of who they love.

Richard Lusimbo

19,688 views • 2 years ago

Whether you support him or not, President Trump’s systematic retaliation against law firms like Susman Godfrey for representing clients or causes he opposes is more than an attack on those firms — it’s an attack on the rule of law itself. Lawyers make easy targets. But as John Adams knew when he defended the British soldiers on trial for the Boston Massacre, securing our rights and freedoms depends on their efforts to uphold the rule of law and defend the unpopular. If you’re being prosecuted, suing the government for violating your rights, or challenging an unconstitutional law, you need a lawyer. And you shouldn’t have to worry about whether the government will retaliate against the attorneys who take your case. Worryingly, there doesn’t seem to be an end in sight to these executive actions that threaten to chill First Amendment-protected advocacy, undermine the right to counsel, and erode due process. President Trump announced that five more executive orders targeting law firms and their clients are forthcoming, even after courts blocked three earlier orders for likely violating the Constitution. The use of executive power to punish opponents is neither new nor confined to a single party, but we should always be alarmed by such unconstitutional overreach. Today’s tactics can just as easily be turned against the views or causes you support tomorrow. For nearly 250 years, America has been a nation of laws, not men. Our heritage of freedom and due process demands that legal processes remain accessible to those with grievances. Access to counsel is a critical part of that liberty.

Whether you support him or not, President Trump’s systematic retaliation against law firms like Susman Godfrey for representing clients or causes he opposes is more than an attack on those firms — it’s an attack on the rule of law itself. Lawyers make easy targets. But as John Adams knew when he defended the British soldiers on trial for the Boston Massacre, securing our rights and freedoms depends on their efforts to uphold the rule of law and defend the unpopular. If you’re being prosecuted, suing the government for violating your rights, or challenging an unconstitutional law, you need a lawyer. And you shouldn’t have to worry about whether the government will retaliate against the attorneys who take your case. Worryingly, there doesn’t seem to be an end in sight to these executive actions that threaten to chill First Amendment-protected advocacy, undermine the right to counsel, and erode due process. President Trump announced that five more executive orders targeting law firms and their clients are forthcoming, even after courts blocked three earlier orders for likely violating the Constitution. The use of executive power to punish opponents is neither new nor confined to a single party, but we should always be alarmed by such unconstitutional overreach. Today’s tactics can just as easily be turned against the views or causes you support tomorrow. For nearly 250 years, America has been a nation of laws, not men. Our heritage of freedom and due process demands that legal processes remain accessible to those with grievances. Access to counsel is a critical part of that liberty.

FIRE

156,425 views • 1 year ago

Bobi Wine was recently selected to address the Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy, marking his second appearance at the prestigious international forum. He first spoke at the summit in 2023 following Uganda’s 2021 general elections. This time, however, the circumstances surrounding his address are markedly different. After the 2026 elections, Bobi Wine fled his home and has remained in hiding amid threats from Muhoozi Kainerugaba, Uganda’s Chief of Defence Forces. As a result, he is expected to deliver his address remotely via video rather than appearing in person. In his 2023 maiden speech at the summit, Bobi Wine described what he characterized as widespread violence and repression during the 2020 election campaigns. He explained the numerous times Ugandans were killed by state authorities, under President Yoweri Museveni, who is responsible for grave human rights violations. His message was direct and focused: he urged the international community to reconsider its relationship with Museveni’s government, calling for an end to financial support and diplomatic cooperation. He further appealed for targeted sanctions against Museveni and his associates, advocating for their international isolation. Despite ongoing concerns raised by human rights organizations and opposition figures, Western governments have continued to engage with Museveni’s administration. This raises an important question: what will Bobi Wine’s upcoming address emphasize under these new and more precarious circumstances? Below is my commentary on his maiden address, during which he introduced himself and his cause to the global stage. YouTube - EU in Uganda United Nations

Bobi Wine was recently selected to address the Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy, marking his second appearance at the prestigious international forum. He first spoke at the summit in 2023 following Uganda’s 2021 general elections. This time, however, the circumstances surrounding his address are markedly different. After the 2026 elections, Bobi Wine fled his home and has remained in hiding amid threats from Muhoozi Kainerugaba, Uganda’s Chief of Defence Forces. As a result, he is expected to deliver his address remotely via video rather than appearing in person. In his 2023 maiden speech at the summit, Bobi Wine described what he characterized as widespread violence and repression during the 2020 election campaigns. He explained the numerous times Ugandans were killed by state authorities, under President Yoweri Museveni, who is responsible for grave human rights violations. His message was direct and focused: he urged the international community to reconsider its relationship with Museveni’s government, calling for an end to financial support and diplomatic cooperation. He further appealed for targeted sanctions against Museveni and his associates, advocating for their international isolation. Despite ongoing concerns raised by human rights organizations and opposition figures, Western governments have continued to engage with Museveni’s administration. This raises an important question: what will Bobi Wine’s upcoming address emphasize under these new and more precarious circumstances? Below is my commentary on his maiden address, during which he introduced himself and his cause to the global stage. YouTube - EU in Uganda United Nations

Mordecai Muriisa ™️

26,590 views • 5 months ago

🚨BREAKING: In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna announces legislation making politically motivated attacks a civil rights violation, ensuring offenders face the full weight of the law: "I'm in the process of writing legislation to update the civil rights codes to ensure that if you are committing an act hate crime as a result of someone's political ideologies and affiliations, that it should be the same charges as a civil rights violation." "There is going to be punitive action, and I'd hope that that person that did this to Charlie gets the electric chair."

🚨BREAKING: In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna announces legislation making politically motivated attacks a civil rights violation, ensuring offenders face the full weight of the law: "I'm in the process of writing legislation to update the civil rights codes to ensure that if you are committing an act hate crime as a result of someone's political ideologies and affiliations, that it should be the same charges as a civil rights violation." "There is going to be punitive action, and I'd hope that that person that did this to Charlie gets the electric chair."

Benny Johnson

1,109,641 views • 10 months ago

This is abhorrent behaviour. Netanyahu is a wanted war criminal, indicted by the International Criminal Court. He should be immediately arrested by any country that purports to support international law. The fact that any politician, or party in Australia or elsewhere would indicate they would not follow through on their obligations under international law is extremely disturbing. It places every Australian at risk as it undermines the very system of rules that underpins our rights including basics like consular protection abroad, human rights protections, aside from basic sovereignty and territorial integrity without which the world is lawless. Australia is obligated under the treaties we have signed to support the independence and rulings of the international justice system which includes the duty to prevent genocide where sufficient evidence exists to invoke that duty, and to end apartheid where legally established by the ICJ. This requires sanctions and all measures to bring it to an end. Our duties are very clear. They do not change according to the case, the State, the individual or any other factor. Netanyahu is a wanted war criminal. And Australia should deliver him to The Hague. As we would any other. Being committed to the arrest of Putin, Duterte or Netanyahu is not a reflection of Australia’s regard or otherwise for our local communities, and should never be characterised as such for political gain, but of our unwavering commitment to justice under the international law established with our direct and proud involvement, and on which our future relies.

This is abhorrent behaviour. Netanyahu is a wanted war criminal, indicted by the International Criminal Court. He should be immediately arrested by any country that purports to support international law. The fact that any politician, or party in Australia or elsewhere would indicate they would not follow through on their obligations under international law is extremely disturbing. It places every Australian at risk as it undermines the very system of rules that underpins our rights including basics like consular protection abroad, human rights protections, aside from basic sovereignty and territorial integrity without which the world is lawless. Australia is obligated under the treaties we have signed to support the independence and rulings of the international justice system which includes the duty to prevent genocide where sufficient evidence exists to invoke that duty, and to end apartheid where legally established by the ICJ. This requires sanctions and all measures to bring it to an end. Our duties are very clear. They do not change according to the case, the State, the individual or any other factor. Netanyahu is a wanted war criminal. And Australia should deliver him to The Hague. As we would any other. Being committed to the arrest of Putin, Duterte or Netanyahu is not a reflection of Australia’s regard or otherwise for our local communities, and should never be characterised as such for political gain, but of our unwavering commitment to justice under the international law established with our direct and proud involvement, and on which our future relies.

Craig F̶o̶s̶t̶e̶r̶

188,680 views • 1 year ago

David Friedberg cites John Quincy Adams on property rights as the foundation of liberty "The moment the idea is admitted into society, that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence." "Fundamental to the foundation of the USA was this idea of private property rights, because if you think about where everybody was coming from, they were these tyrannical governments, monarchies, where some overlord or some cabal could decide at any point to take what you have. You had no property rights as an individual." "That stasis drove so many to come to the USA and say, we want a place where individuals can say, I own something and no one can take it from me." "Private property rights are the foundation of liberty." david friedberg The All-In Podcast

David Friedberg cites John Quincy Adams on property rights as the foundation of liberty "The moment the idea is admitted into society, that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence." "Fundamental to the foundation of the USA was this idea of private property rights, because if you think about where everybody was coming from, they were these tyrannical governments, monarchies, where some overlord or some cabal could decide at any point to take what you have. You had no property rights as an individual." "That stasis drove so many to come to the USA and say, we want a place where individuals can say, I own something and no one can take it from me." "Private property rights are the foundation of liberty." david friedberg The All-In Podcast

KanekoaTheGreat

53,320 views • 2 days ago

Francesca Albanese on Fire: A Lesson to Canada 🇨🇦 on International Law and Palestinian 🇵🇸 Rights "The priority is to stop the genocide. If the government here, the parliamentarians here want to call it a 'Ceasefire,' call it the way they want, but this is the priority. The rest is secondary. Which doesn't mean that the recognition of the State of Palestine is not important. My question is, if this country has entertained discussions on the two-state solution, how come it does not recognize the state of Palestine yet? What is there to be debated? The recognition of Palestine 🇵🇸 shouldn't take time; it should be automatic and be an act of coherence. Otherwise, if you don't recognize it, it means that you shouldn't be talking about it at all. Why are you even a voice in the debate? It's about coherence. I know what I'm saying is blunt, but we need to be blunt because the impunity that has been granted to Israel for decades has led to this, which is a disaster both for the Palestinians and the Israelis. Again, diplomatic talks have been turned into a place to justify the unimaginable, the illegal... Is Canada spending any of its political capital to make sure that the genocide ends as soon as possible, the ceasefire, whatever, but then there is already a deadline set for the end of occupation? The ICJ has passed an advisory opinion which declares the occupation unlawful and to be dismantled unconditionally and totally as rapidly as possible, and that 'as rapid as possible' has been defined by the General Assembly; it must happen by September next year. What is Canada doing to ensure that the Occupation is dismantled? And then, more than these, there is Apartheid. I know that in this country, you feel uncomfortable with the word 'Apartheid,' but you have to tell me why? Because I, together with Israeli human rights organizations, Palestinian human rights organizations, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, Harvard University, and thousands of Israelis, talking about Apartheid, give you the evidence of it, and here, like in other parts of North America, I hear, 'Hmm... we cannot say that word.' It's your problem... International law is so clear that it doesn't allow you to find excuses. So, however, end the genocide, end the Occupation, end the Apartheid; this is what it means to apply international law and help build peace for Palestinians, Israelis, and anyone who calls that land home." — Francesca Albanese at a Press Conference in Canada. Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur oPt

Francesca Albanese on Fire: A Lesson to Canada 🇨🇦 on International Law and Palestinian 🇵🇸 Rights "The priority is to stop the genocide. If the government here, the parliamentarians here want to call it a 'Ceasefire,' call it the way they want, but this is the priority. The rest is secondary. Which doesn't mean that the recognition of the State of Palestine is not important. My question is, if this country has entertained discussions on the two-state solution, how come it does not recognize the state of Palestine yet? What is there to be debated? The recognition of Palestine 🇵🇸 shouldn't take time; it should be automatic and be an act of coherence. Otherwise, if you don't recognize it, it means that you shouldn't be talking about it at all. Why are you even a voice in the debate? It's about coherence. I know what I'm saying is blunt, but we need to be blunt because the impunity that has been granted to Israel for decades has led to this, which is a disaster both for the Palestinians and the Israelis. Again, diplomatic talks have been turned into a place to justify the unimaginable, the illegal... Is Canada spending any of its political capital to make sure that the genocide ends as soon as possible, the ceasefire, whatever, but then there is already a deadline set for the end of occupation? The ICJ has passed an advisory opinion which declares the occupation unlawful and to be dismantled unconditionally and totally as rapidly as possible, and that 'as rapid as possible' has been defined by the General Assembly; it must happen by September next year. What is Canada doing to ensure that the Occupation is dismantled? And then, more than these, there is Apartheid. I know that in this country, you feel uncomfortable with the word 'Apartheid,' but you have to tell me why? Because I, together with Israeli human rights organizations, Palestinian human rights organizations, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, Harvard University, and thousands of Israelis, talking about Apartheid, give you the evidence of it, and here, like in other parts of North America, I hear, 'Hmm... we cannot say that word.' It's your problem... International law is so clear that it doesn't allow you to find excuses. So, however, end the genocide, end the Occupation, end the Apartheid; this is what it means to apply international law and help build peace for Palestinians, Israelis, and anyone who calls that land home." — Francesca Albanese at a Press Conference in Canada. Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur oPt

The Compass Report 🧭

31,969 views • 1 year ago

THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE AGAINST HONOURABLE TUNDU A. LISSU IS THE LAW BEING DISREGARDED? The Tanganyika Law Society (TLS) raises its voice regarding the troubling conduct in the criminal case against Honourable Tundu Antipas Lissu — a lawyer, former Member of Parliament, and one of the nation’s prominent advocates for human rights, good governance, and constitutionalism. Since his arrest, there has been a disturbing pattern undermining the principles of justice, violating legal procedures, and casting a heavy shadow over our criminal justice system. This is evident in the following: His arrest was conducted without adherence to lawful procedures, signaling an abuse of power; The charges appear to be politically motivated, raising serious concerns about the use of judicial processes as tools for political ends; Denial of even the basic right to greet and meet with fellow citizens before the official hearing of the case; Repeated adjournments of the case on legally unsubstantial grounds, indicating a deviation from legal focus; Interference with or denial of the accused’s right to private consultations with his lawyers, which violates the right to equal legal representation; Indications of breaches of the attorney-client privilege, which is protected under the Constitution and legal framework, and is a cornerstone of the right to an effective legal defense. The right of a client to consult privately with their lawyer is a fundamental right protected by the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, the Evidence Act, and the Code of Ethics for Advocates. To restrict or interfere with this right is to undermine the foundation of the justice process and impair the accused’s ability to defend themselves adequately before the court. TLS emphasizes the following: The law must not be used as a weapon against justice; State authorities must not place themselves above the Constitution or the laws enacted by Parliament; The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) must reflect deeply on the significant constitutional powers he holds in criminal justice and whether there is sufficient accountability to protect citizens' rights and ensure adherence to the law at all times; The right to legal assistance is not a privilege — it is a right of every citizen. Any criminal case, especially those involving individuals with political or social stature, must be conducted with transparency, fairness, and with respect for human dignity. The Tanganyika Law Society (TLS) continues to closely monitor the progress of this case. We reiterate that justice must not only be done but must also be seen to be done. We call upon the Judiciary and all state organs to uphold and protect the rights of the accused in accordance with the law and the Constitution. Furthermore, we urge all lawyers in the country, the media, and human rights stakeholders to continue championing the protection of justice, freedom of expression, and the rule of law — without fear or favour. BAK MWABUKUSI President, Tanganyika Law Society (TLS)

THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE AGAINST HONOURABLE TUNDU A. LISSU IS THE LAW BEING DISREGARDED? The Tanganyika Law Society (TLS) raises its voice regarding the troubling conduct in the criminal case against Honourable Tundu Antipas Lissu — a lawyer, former Member of Parliament, and one of the nation’s prominent advocates for human rights, good governance, and constitutionalism. Since his arrest, there has been a disturbing pattern undermining the principles of justice, violating legal procedures, and casting a heavy shadow over our criminal justice system. This is evident in the following: His arrest was conducted without adherence to lawful procedures, signaling an abuse of power; The charges appear to be politically motivated, raising serious concerns about the use of judicial processes as tools for political ends; Denial of even the basic right to greet and meet with fellow citizens before the official hearing of the case; Repeated adjournments of the case on legally unsubstantial grounds, indicating a deviation from legal focus; Interference with or denial of the accused’s right to private consultations with his lawyers, which violates the right to equal legal representation; Indications of breaches of the attorney-client privilege, which is protected under the Constitution and legal framework, and is a cornerstone of the right to an effective legal defense. The right of a client to consult privately with their lawyer is a fundamental right protected by the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, the Evidence Act, and the Code of Ethics for Advocates. To restrict or interfere with this right is to undermine the foundation of the justice process and impair the accused’s ability to defend themselves adequately before the court. TLS emphasizes the following: The law must not be used as a weapon against justice; State authorities must not place themselves above the Constitution or the laws enacted by Parliament; The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) must reflect deeply on the significant constitutional powers he holds in criminal justice and whether there is sufficient accountability to protect citizens' rights and ensure adherence to the law at all times; The right to legal assistance is not a privilege — it is a right of every citizen. Any criminal case, especially those involving individuals with political or social stature, must be conducted with transparency, fairness, and with respect for human dignity. The Tanganyika Law Society (TLS) continues to closely monitor the progress of this case. We reiterate that justice must not only be done but must also be seen to be done. We call upon the Judiciary and all state organs to uphold and protect the rights of the accused in accordance with the law and the Constitution. Furthermore, we urge all lawyers in the country, the media, and human rights stakeholders to continue championing the protection of justice, freedom of expression, and the rule of law — without fear or favour. BAK MWABUKUSI President, Tanganyika Law Society (TLS)

Boniface Mwabukusi

15,205 views • 1 year ago

Itamar ben‑Gvir told Israel's Channel 7 that the Israeli government is ordering new uniforms and opening a dedicated death row wing following a controversial new execution law targeting Palestinians. He said the measures are necessary to punish Palestinians even as human rights groups warned that the questionable law deepens state violence and undermines legal safeguards. Israel will only be executing Palestinian prisoners and does not extend the same punishment to Israeli citizens, highlighting its discriminatory nature. International condemnation has been swift as the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights called the law discriminatory and a potential war crime. European governments, including Britain, France and Germany, described it as dangerously discriminatory, while many Muslim‑majority states, including Pakistan, Turkey and Egypt, denounced it as a violation of international law. Amnesty International said the law undermines due process and fair trial rights, and other regional human rights forums called for urgent global action to halt its implementation. Critics argue the legislation entrenches a racist system of state violence and specifically targets Palestinians.

Itamar ben‑Gvir told Israel's Channel 7 that the Israeli government is ordering new uniforms and opening a dedicated death row wing following a controversial new execution law targeting Palestinians. He said the measures are necessary to punish Palestinians even as human rights groups warned that the questionable law deepens state violence and undermines legal safeguards. Israel will only be executing Palestinian prisoners and does not extend the same punishment to Israeli citizens, highlighting its discriminatory nature. International condemnation has been swift as the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights called the law discriminatory and a potential war crime. European governments, including Britain, France and Germany, described it as dangerously discriminatory, while many Muslim‑majority states, including Pakistan, Turkey and Egypt, denounced it as a violation of international law. Amnesty International said the law undermines due process and fair trial rights, and other regional human rights forums called for urgent global action to halt its implementation. Critics argue the legislation entrenches a racist system of state violence and specifically targets Palestinians.

Middle East Eye

31,018 views • 3 months ago