Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🚨 BOMBSHELL: ATF Ballistics Expert ADMITS the Rifle Had DUST Inside the Barrel When Recovered — PROOF The Gun Had NOT Been Recently Fired 😱 During cross-examination, ATF firearms examiner Samantha Karner confirmed under oath that when the alleged murder rifle was recovered, there was dust and debris inside... the barrel. When asked if she inspected the interior of the barrel, she replied: “I believe my notes state that debris and dust was observed in the inside of the barrel.” This is significant because if the rifle had been recently fired (as prosecutors claim), the force of the shot would have blown out any dust or debris inside the barrel. The presence of dust strongly suggests the gun had not been fired recently. This is yet another major piece of exculpatory evidence that undermines the claim that Tyler Robinson used this rifle to shoot Charlie Kirk. TAG Candace Owens, RT and watch the other damning exculpatory evidence revealed in my post below.👇show more

Project Constitution

293,830 subscribers

375,550 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

‼️PART 2: Candace Owens Breaks Down the MOST Damaging EXCULPATORY Evidence From Tyler Robinson’s Hearing — DNA Forensics & Firearm Ballistics 🔍👀 In tonight’s episode, Candace Owens highlighted two major pieces of testimony from the ATF that directly undermine the claim that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk. First, ATF forensic biologist Caitlin Oliver testified that Tyler Robinson’s DNA was the most degraded of all the samples found on the gun. She also confirmed there were multiple DNA contributors on the weapon — including Lance Twiggs and even Tyler’s father. Candace explained that if Tyler had recently fired the rifle, his DNA should have been among the freshest, not the most degraded. This strongly suggests his DNA was left on the gun long before September 10th. Even more explosive was the testimony from ATF ballistics expert Samantha Carner. Of the seven bullet fragments removed from Charlie Kirk’s body, only one was usable for analysis. That single fragment had a diameter too small to have come from Tyler Robinson’s .30-06 rifle. Additionally, Something HUGE Candace missed was that the ATF Analyst that performed the tesiting admitted the recovered rifle had dust inside the barrel — when it was recovered, which PROVES it had NOT been recently fired. This is not the overwhelming case they’ve been selling. The forensic evidence actually points away from Tyler Robinson as the shooter. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇

‼️PART 2: Candace Owens Breaks Down the MOST Damaging EXCULPATORY Evidence From Tyler Robinson’s Hearing — DNA Forensics & Firearm Ballistics 🔍👀 In tonight’s episode, Candace Owens highlighted two major pieces of testimony from the ATF that directly undermine the claim that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk. First, ATF forensic biologist Caitlin Oliver testified that Tyler Robinson’s DNA was the most degraded of all the samples found on the gun. She also confirmed there were multiple DNA contributors on the weapon — including Lance Twiggs and even Tyler’s father. Candace explained that if Tyler had recently fired the rifle, his DNA should have been among the freshest, not the most degraded. This strongly suggests his DNA was left on the gun long before September 10th. Even more explosive was the testimony from ATF ballistics expert Samantha Carner. Of the seven bullet fragments removed from Charlie Kirk’s body, only one was usable for analysis. That single fragment had a diameter too small to have come from Tyler Robinson’s .30-06 rifle. Additionally, Something HUGE Candace missed was that the ATF Analyst that performed the tesiting admitted the recovered rifle had dust inside the barrel — when it was recovered, which PROVES it had NOT been recently fired. This is not the overwhelming case they’ve been selling. The forensic evidence actually points away from Tyler Robinson as the shooter. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

14,453 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

‼️EXPOSED: Blake Neff Just Showed EXACTLY Why People Don’t Trust TPUSA Anymore 👀 Tonight on Paramount Not So Tactical’s Space, Blake Neff spent the entire time defending the official story while refusing to engage with basic questions about the evidence. When pressed on the car footage, the bullet diameter mismatch, the dust in the barrel, and the timeline contradictions, Blake didn’t address any of it. Instead, he called the exploding mic theory “the dumbest thing in the world,” compared it to bad TV writing, and tried to shut down the conversation by saying “that’s not what we’re here to talk about.” Even when it was pointed out that the ATF ballistics expert admitted the recovered rifle had dust inside the barrel (meaning it hadn’t been recently fired), Blake brushed it off and said he didn’t know what she meant by “dust.” This is the same guy who has positioned himself as someone just “reporting the facts.” But when actual inconsistencies from the preliminary hearing are brought up, he immediately pivots to defending TPUSA and attacking the people asking questions. If the evidence was as overwhelming as they claim, why does the defense of it always turn into deflection and insults instead of addressing the actual forensics?

‼️EXPOSED: Blake Neff Just Showed EXACTLY Why People Don’t Trust TPUSA Anymore 👀 Tonight on Paramount Not So Tactical’s Space, Blake Neff spent the entire time defending the official story while refusing to engage with basic questions about the evidence. When pressed on the car footage, the bullet diameter mismatch, the dust in the barrel, and the timeline contradictions, Blake didn’t address any of it. Instead, he called the exploding mic theory “the dumbest thing in the world,” compared it to bad TV writing, and tried to shut down the conversation by saying “that’s not what we’re here to talk about.” Even when it was pointed out that the ATF ballistics expert admitted the recovered rifle had dust inside the barrel (meaning it hadn’t been recently fired), Blake brushed it off and said he didn’t know what she meant by “dust.” This is the same guy who has positioned himself as someone just “reporting the facts.” But when actual inconsistencies from the preliminary hearing are brought up, he immediately pivots to defending TPUSA and attacking the people asking questions. If the evidence was as overwhelming as they claim, why does the defense of it always turn into deflection and insults instead of addressing the actual forensics?

Project Constitution

103,158 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

‼️EXPOSED: Blake Neff Just Showed EXACTLY Why People Don’t Trust TPUSA Anymore — Sorry I Scuffed The First Attempt, I PROMISE You Can Hear Me This Time. 😂 Last Night on Paramount Not So Tactical’s Space,Blake Neff spent the entire time defending the official story while refusing to engage with basic questions about the evidence. When pressed on the car footage, the bullet diameter mismatch, the dust in the barrel, and the timeline contradictions, Blake didn’t address any of it. Instead, he called the exploding mic theory “the dumbest thing in the world,” compared it to bad TV writing, and tried to shut down the conversation by saying “that’s not what we’re here to talk about.” Even when it was pointed out that the ATF ballistics expert admitted the recovered rifle had dust inside the barrel (meaning it hadn’t been recently fired), Blake brushed it off and said he didn’t know what she meant by “dust.” This is the same guy who has positioned himself as someone just “reporting the facts.” But when actual inconsistencies from the preliminary hearing are brought up, he immediately pivots to defending TPUSA and attacking the people asking questions. If the evidence was as overwhelming as they claim, why does the defense of it always turn into deflection and insults instead of addressing the actual forensics? CC:Candace Owens Baron Coleman

‼️EXPOSED: Blake Neff Just Showed EXACTLY Why People Don’t Trust TPUSA Anymore — Sorry I Scuffed The First Attempt, I PROMISE You Can Hear Me This Time. 😂 Last Night on Paramount Not So Tactical’s Space,Blake Neff spent the entire time defending the official story while refusing to engage with basic questions about the evidence. When pressed on the car footage, the bullet diameter mismatch, the dust in the barrel, and the timeline contradictions, Blake didn’t address any of it. Instead, he called the exploding mic theory “the dumbest thing in the world,” compared it to bad TV writing, and tried to shut down the conversation by saying “that’s not what we’re here to talk about.” Even when it was pointed out that the ATF ballistics expert admitted the recovered rifle had dust inside the barrel (meaning it hadn’t been recently fired), Blake brushed it off and said he didn’t know what she meant by “dust.” This is the same guy who has positioned himself as someone just “reporting the facts.” But when actual inconsistencies from the preliminary hearing are brought up, he immediately pivots to defending TPUSA and attacking the people asking questions. If the evidence was as overwhelming as they claim, why does the defense of it always turn into deflection and insults instead of addressing the actual forensics? CC:Candace Owens Baron Coleman

Project Constitution

32,571 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

You should look at exactly what Candace Owens doesn't want you to see. The ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson owned. This is extremely significant because it undercuts this narrative that a .30-06 round couldn't possibly have killed Charlie Kirk. The “inconclusive” part of the ATF report means the bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body was too damaged to match or exclude when compared to ballistics markings on a bullet test fired by law enforcement from Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This doesn’t mean the bullet wasn’t fired from that rifle. It means there wasn’t enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or exclude it with a bullet test fired from Tyler Robinson's rifle. This happens in 20-66% of cases when there's a bullet jacket fragment recovered from an autopsy. But the .30 caliber class round is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used. Candace claims the ATF did not hand over any of this analysis or data to the defense—this is false. We know the defense cited this ATF report in their January 9, 2026 filing.

You should look at exactly what Candace Owens doesn't want you to see. The ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson owned. This is extremely significant because it undercuts this narrative that a .30-06 round couldn't possibly have killed Charlie Kirk. The “inconclusive” part of the ATF report means the bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body was too damaged to match or exclude when compared to ballistics markings on a bullet test fired by law enforcement from Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This doesn’t mean the bullet wasn’t fired from that rifle. It means there wasn’t enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or exclude it with a bullet test fired from Tyler Robinson's rifle. This happens in 20-66% of cases when there's a bullet jacket fragment recovered from an autopsy. But the .30 caliber class round is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used. Candace claims the ATF did not hand over any of this analysis or data to the defense—this is false. We know the defense cited this ATF report in their January 9, 2026 filing.

Liz Wheeler

46,277 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 Candace Owens claims after he meeting with Erika Kirk that she does not believe Tyler Robinson murdered Charlie Kirk Reminder, court documents state: “DNA consistent with Robinson’s was found on the trigger, other parts of the rifle, the fired cartridge casing, two of the three unfired cartridges, and the towel”

🚨 Candace Owens claims after he meeting with Erika Kirk that she does not believe Tyler Robinson murdered Charlie Kirk Reminder, court documents state: “DNA consistent with Robinson’s was found on the trigger, other parts of the rifle, the fired cartridge casing, two of the three unfired cartridges, and the towel”

Ian Miles Cheong

27,111 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

JUST IN: FBI confirms they believe they’ve recovered the weapon used in Charlie Kirk’s assassination. The shooter only fired once…because the coward knew that it would only take one shot with that style of firearm. “I can tell you that we have recovered what we believe is the weapon to be that was used in yesterday’s shooting.” “It is a high powered bolt action rifle.” “That rifle was recovered in a wooded area where the shooter had fled.” “The FBI laboratory will be analyzing this weapon.”

JUST IN: FBI confirms they believe they’ve recovered the weapon used in Charlie Kirk’s assassination. The shooter only fired once…because the coward knew that it would only take one shot with that style of firearm. “I can tell you that we have recovered what we believe is the weapon to be that was used in yesterday’s shooting.” “It is a high powered bolt action rifle.” “That rifle was recovered in a wooded area where the shooter had fled.” “The FBI laboratory will be analyzing this weapon.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,529,631 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

‼️BREAKING: Prosecution Shows Rifle Photos In Tyler Robinson Hearing — But There’s A Major Problem 👀 In Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing, prosecutors just showed photos of the rifle they claim was used to assassinate Charlie Kirk. They displayed: The exact location where the gun was allegedly found The rifle wrapped in a towel (how they say it was discovered) The same rifle out of the towel and in a box Here’s the critical issue: This is a sporterized Mauser .30-06 with a low-mounted scope. If the rifle still has its original military-style wing safety, it would be nearly impossible to operate with that scope mounted. The safety wing would have to flip up and over the bolt — directly into the scope. For this rifle to actually fire with the current scope setup, it would need an aftermarket low-profile safety that clears the optic. So the question is simple: Looking at these photos the prosecution just presented… does this rifle still have the original military wing safety, or has it been modified with a low-profile aftermarket safety? If it still has the original safety, this gun — as configured — could not have been fired with that scope in place. This is a major problem for the prosecution’s case. Watch the clip and look closely at the safety on the rifle. What do you see? More on this coming. Follow for the technical breakdowns they’re not addressing in court. CC: Candace Owens Baron Coleman

Project Constitution

727,591 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

‼️🇺🇸: Candace Owens SHARES ALL HER VIDEO & PHOTO EVIDENCE OF CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION Candace Owens just dropped the ENTIRE video segment from the camera directly behind Charlie Kirk when he was shot. The SD card from this camera was removed at the scene by Terryl Farnsworth. 🤨 She notes that remarkably THERE IS NO BLOOD VISIBLE on the back of Charlie, highlighting that the "30-06" round did not go through. She also released photos from inside the SUV with the plastic debris that took Charlie to the hospital that fateful day. This is ALL of it.

‼️🇺🇸: Candace Owens SHARES ALL HER VIDEO & PHOTO EVIDENCE OF CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION Candace Owens just dropped the ENTIRE video segment from the camera directly behind Charlie Kirk when he was shot. The SD card from this camera was removed at the scene by Terryl Farnsworth. 🤨 She notes that remarkably THERE IS NO BLOOD VISIBLE on the back of Charlie, highlighting that the "30-06" round did not go through. She also released photos from inside the SUV with the plastic debris that took Charlie to the hospital that fateful day. This is ALL of it.

Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸

968,163 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CASE JUST EXPLODED — “KILL SHOT” BULLET DOES NOT MATCH TYLER ROBINSON’S RIFLE Everyone said something felt off. They were right. A new court filing claims the ATF couldn’t tie the fatal bullet to the rifle linked to Tyler Robinson. Read that again. • The bullet that killed Charlie Kirk… not matched to Tyler Robinson's rifle • The weapon they said was used… now in question • DNA on the evidence? Multiple contributors This was supposed to be airtight. Now it’s collapsing in real time. So if Tyler Robinson’s rifle didn’t fire the shot… then who, or what, actually did?

🚨 CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CASE JUST EXPLODED — “KILL SHOT” BULLET DOES NOT MATCH TYLER ROBINSON’S RIFLE Everyone said something felt off. They were right. A new court filing claims the ATF couldn’t tie the fatal bullet to the rifle linked to Tyler Robinson. Read that again. • The bullet that killed Charlie Kirk… not matched to Tyler Robinson's rifle • The weapon they said was used… now in question • DNA on the evidence? Multiple contributors This was supposed to be airtight. Now it’s collapsing in real time. So if Tyler Robinson’s rifle didn’t fire the shot… then who, or what, actually did?

HustleBitch

1,607,148 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The Daily Mail still hasn’t updated its headline: “Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims” They should be ashamed of themselves. An earlier case filing cites the ATF’s finding on the bullet: “The result of the comparison was inconclusive.” If there's an “inconclusive” result, it does not mean that the bullet was not fired from that rifle. It means that there was not enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or not match it with a bullet test-fired from the rifle. That's ALL it means.

The Daily Mail still hasn’t updated its headline: “Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims” They should be ashamed of themselves. An earlier case filing cites the ATF’s finding on the bullet: “The result of the comparison was inconclusive.” If there's an “inconclusive” result, it does not mean that the bullet was not fired from that rifle. It means that there was not enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or not match it with a bullet test-fired from the rifle. That's ALL it means.

Liz Wheeler

19,316 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Candace Owens appears on Piers Morgans Uncensored and is asked if, after meeting with Erika Kirk, she now believes that Tyler Robinson was responsible for the murder of Charlie Kirk. Her response: "Absolutely not. In fact, I have seen more evidence to the contrary." Evidence which she has not revealed, of course.

Candace Owens appears on Piers Morgans Uncensored and is asked if, after meeting with Erika Kirk, she now believes that Tyler Robinson was responsible for the murder of Charlie Kirk. Her response: "Absolutely not. In fact, I have seen more evidence to the contrary." Evidence which she has not revealed, of course.

𝔸η𝐓

83,996 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨THE SHOOTER WAS MUCH CLOSER - CHARLIE KIRK WAS SHOT FROM THE CROWD 🚨 CANDACE OWENS: “It is totally plausible that there were multiple people there that day, maybe even deciding in the last hour which one of them would take the shot.” “It is likely that a rifle was fired to muffle the sound of a smaller gun… which had to come from the front of Charlie.” “We are looking for a person that was a lot closer to Charlie, and likely in the audience.” “That goes a long way in explaining why they’re hiding the footage from behind Charlie’s head.” “Of all the cameras, why grab that one first?” “There’s a lot of hiding and definitively a lot of lying going on.”

🚨THE SHOOTER WAS MUCH CLOSER - CHARLIE KIRK WAS SHOT FROM THE CROWD 🚨 CANDACE OWENS: “It is totally plausible that there were multiple people there that day, maybe even deciding in the last hour which one of them would take the shot.” “It is likely that a rifle was fired to muffle the sound of a smaller gun… which had to come from the front of Charlie.” “We are looking for a person that was a lot closer to Charlie, and likely in the audience.” “That goes a long way in explaining why they’re hiding the footage from behind Charlie’s head.” “Of all the cameras, why grab that one first?” “There’s a lot of hiding and definitively a lot of lying going on.”

HustleBitch

101,606 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Trump's Department of Justice under Pam Bondi has once again gone on record to defend its national gun registry under the National Firearms Act. They have filed their response claiming that the short barrel rifle, short barrel shotgun, and silencer/suppressor are "weapons of war". The mask is off and the true anti-gun nature of the this administration is on full display. AAGHarmeetDhillon ran cover for they betrayals and dereliction of Attorney General Pamela Bondi & DOJ Civil Rights Division

Trump's Department of Justice under Pam Bondi has once again gone on record to defend its national gun registry under the National Firearms Act. They have filed their response claiming that the short barrel rifle, short barrel shotgun, and silencer/suppressor are "weapons of war". The mask is off and the true anti-gun nature of the this administration is on full display. AAGHarmeetDhillon ran cover for they betrayals and dereliction of Attorney General Pamela Bondi & DOJ Civil Rights Division

Curtis Hallstrom

29,441 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Ian Carroll I hope this is not the testimony you’re referring to. If so, it just further proves what a liar you are. Nestor: “But you don’t know what the K9 was tasked with?” Detective Hull: “My understanding was that it may have been used in an effort to track an individual that jumped off the roof, but I don’t know for certain.” Nestor: “Obviously that didn’t produce any results?” Detective Hull: “Not that I was made aware of.” The full account from Agent Faumina (SBI) of how the rifle was found is provided in this clip. Facts: 1) There is zero evidence the rifle was missed by any dogs. 2) There is no evidence that “bomb” dogs were ever tasked with finding the rifle. 3) There is zero evidence that FBI agents directed UT County Sheriff Deputies where to look for the rifle as claimed by Candace. 4) There is no evidence the “rifle was planted by the Feds” as claimed/insinuated by Candace. It’s another convenient, unverifiable BS story from an anonymous source, pushed by Candace Owens and her chief lying lapdog Ian Carroll. Those claims are contradicted by testimony and facts. Remember y’all, in 10 months Candace Owens has not produced a single piece of evidence that could be admitted in court. Also remember that Ian Carroll called the picture of the rifle a “stock photo” for over 10 months and still hasn’t corrected the record or admitted he lied (or was wrong). Wake up.

Ian Carroll I hope this is not the testimony you’re referring to. If so, it just further proves what a liar you are. Nestor: “But you don’t know what the K9 was tasked with?” Detective Hull: “My understanding was that it may have been used in an effort to track an individual that jumped off the roof, but I don’t know for certain.” Nestor: “Obviously that didn’t produce any results?” Detective Hull: “Not that I was made aware of.” The full account from Agent Faumina (SBI) of how the rifle was found is provided in this clip. Facts: 1) There is zero evidence the rifle was missed by any dogs. 2) There is no evidence that “bomb” dogs were ever tasked with finding the rifle. 3) There is zero evidence that FBI agents directed UT County Sheriff Deputies where to look for the rifle as claimed by Candace. 4) There is no evidence the “rifle was planted by the Feds” as claimed/insinuated by Candace. It’s another convenient, unverifiable BS story from an anonymous source, pushed by Candace Owens and her chief lying lapdog Ian Carroll. Those claims are contradicted by testimony and facts. Remember y’all, in 10 months Candace Owens has not produced a single piece of evidence that could be admitted in court. Also remember that Ian Carroll called the picture of the rifle a “stock photo” for over 10 months and still hasn’t corrected the record or admitted he lied (or was wrong). Wake up.

Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

16,977 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

🚨BREAKING: Read the Official Court Filing in the Tyler Robinson Case—Just Released😳 The establishment is trying to bury the details of the newest court filing in the Tyler Robinson case, but the actual documents prove the entire official narrative is collapsing in real-time. The state does not have an open-and-shut case. They have a massive, compromised mess, and they are scrambling. Here is exactly what the defense's new motion reveals: The prosecution's entire timeline relies on the rifle found at the scene. But the filing officially confirms that the ATF’s firearm analysis on the bullet recovered during the autopsy was "inconclusive." They cannot forensically match the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk to the weapon they claim Tyler Robinson used. The defense is literally planning to use the state's own ATF ballistics report as exculpatory evidence to clear Tyler's name. They told the public this was a lone gunman. Yet, the FBI and ATF DNA reports indicate that multiple different DNA profiles (a DNA mixture) were found on the evidence, including the rifle. The crime scene was contaminated, the weapon was handled by multiple people, and the Feds are desperately trying to sort through the mess. How is the state responding to their lack of forensic evidence? By burying the defense. The filing reveals the prosecution just dumped 20,000 electronic audio files and written documents onto Tyler’s lawyers. It is a classic stall tactic. Because the Feds' testing is so convoluted and full of mixed DNA, the defense is demanding a 6-month delay so they can bring in independent forensic biologists, genetic systems engineers, and statisticians to verify if the FBI and ATF even applied correct scientific procedures. Tyler Robinson is a scapegoat, and the physical evidence proves it. 🇺🇸⚓️

🚨BREAKING: Read the Official Court Filing in the Tyler Robinson Case—Just Released😳 The establishment is trying to bury the details of the newest court filing in the Tyler Robinson case, but the actual documents prove the entire official narrative is collapsing in real-time. The state does not have an open-and-shut case. They have a massive, compromised mess, and they are scrambling. Here is exactly what the defense's new motion reveals: The prosecution's entire timeline relies on the rifle found at the scene. But the filing officially confirms that the ATF’s firearm analysis on the bullet recovered during the autopsy was "inconclusive." They cannot forensically match the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk to the weapon they claim Tyler Robinson used. The defense is literally planning to use the state's own ATF ballistics report as exculpatory evidence to clear Tyler's name. They told the public this was a lone gunman. Yet, the FBI and ATF DNA reports indicate that multiple different DNA profiles (a DNA mixture) were found on the evidence, including the rifle. The crime scene was contaminated, the weapon was handled by multiple people, and the Feds are desperately trying to sort through the mess. How is the state responding to their lack of forensic evidence? By burying the defense. The filing reveals the prosecution just dumped 20,000 electronic audio files and written documents onto Tyler’s lawyers. It is a classic stall tactic. Because the Feds' testing is so convoluted and full of mixed DNA, the defense is demanding a 6-month delay so they can bring in independent forensic biologists, genetic systems engineers, and statisticians to verify if the FBI and ATF even applied correct scientific procedures. Tyler Robinson is a scapegoat, and the physical evidence proves it. 🇺🇸⚓️

Project Constitution

67,807 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

😱MASSIVE BREAK: The Fatal Flaw in the Tyler Robinson Case—Gun Could NOT Have Been Fired! 👀 The mainstream media is aggressively pushing the narrative that Tyler Robinson used a WWII-era .30-06 Mauser to assassinate Charlie Kirk. But if you actually understand firearm mechanics, there is a glaring, undeniable hole in their story. Take a close look at photos of the rifle the Feds are trying to sell to the public as the "murder weapon." BTW The phot release is NOT the actual gun recovered but a generic Remington 700 or a Mauser 125th-anniversary model with the background edited out). Anyway, regardless of that; the Mauser 98 allegedly used by Tyler Robinson features a $2k low-mounted scope. Here is the mechanical reality the FBI hopes you don't notice: 🛑 The Mauser Wing Safety: The original Mauser 98 action uses a tall, 3-position "wing" or "flag" safety on the back of the bolt. To take the rifle off "SAFE" and put it on "FIRE", that metal flag has to flip in a 180-degree arc directly over the top of the bolt. 🛑 The Scope Collision: Look at how low that optic is mounted. If this rifle still has its original military-style safety, you cannot physically push the safety to the "FIRE" position. The metal flag will instantly smash directly into the bottom of the scope's ocular bell. Let's be completely clear about the facts: This rifle could NOT have been fired unless it was equipped with an aftermarket modified safety (like a low-profile or side-swing safety). If the rifle in FBI custody retains the original military safety, it is literally an inoperable prop. The safety flag is physically blocked by the optic scope, meaning you cannot switch the safety off, and YOU CANNOT PULL THE TRIGGER. Is this why the FBI has locked the physical gun away at Quantico? Is this why they are flat-out refusing to let Tyler Robinson’s defense attorneys physically examine the weapon? If a defense expert gets their hands on it and confirms an unmodified safety, they will prove in open court that the state's murder weapon couldn't have fired the fatal shot. The state's case isn't just full of holes—it defies the basic laws of physics. 👇 Look at the diagrams. Understand the mechanics. SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE. The official narrative is collapsing. CREDIT: Sara Kirk 🩷 FOLLOW Her!

Project Constitution

182,395 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Reason Five: There are multiple inconsistencies with the firearms that were claimed to have been used, the ballistics of the shots, and the audio of the shooting from that night. In the audio from the incident, it is clear that there is overlapping rates of fire, meaning that more than one rifle was shooting at the same time. How did Stephen Paddock accomplish this as a lone shooter? Authorities have consistently stated that the shooter used bump stocks. However, the audio does not match the firing rate of a rifle with a bump stock. Moreover, bump stocks are highly unreliable and severely reduce accuracy, making them unlikely choices for any skilled shooter. The ballistics of the shots suggest they were fired from 600-900 yards away, not the 300-500 yards distance from the hotel. This implies the shots likely originated from the airspace between the hotels. The last two notable points are: first, no glass was broken in the hotel until 10:16 p.m., after the initial volleys of shooting had concluded and two additional shots were fired from a pistol. Second, SDS Law has asserted that the U.S. Government has not yet proven that any victim was injured or killed by the weapons recovered from Stephen Paddock's room. None of this is adding up.

Reason Five: There are multiple inconsistencies with the firearms that were claimed to have been used, the ballistics of the shots, and the audio of the shooting from that night. In the audio from the incident, it is clear that there is overlapping rates of fire, meaning that more than one rifle was shooting at the same time. How did Stephen Paddock accomplish this as a lone shooter? Authorities have consistently stated that the shooter used bump stocks. However, the audio does not match the firing rate of a rifle with a bump stock. Moreover, bump stocks are highly unreliable and severely reduce accuracy, making them unlikely choices for any skilled shooter. The ballistics of the shots suggest they were fired from 600-900 yards away, not the 300-500 yards distance from the hotel. This implies the shots likely originated from the airspace between the hotels. The last two notable points are: first, no glass was broken in the hotel until 10:16 p.m., after the initial volleys of shooting had concluded and two additional shots were fired from a pistol. Second, SDS Law has asserted that the U.S. Government has not yet proven that any victim was injured or killed by the weapons recovered from Stephen Paddock's room. None of this is adding up.

Green Beret Nap Time

353,391 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨THREAD: Was Candace Owens’ “Inside Source” Joe Kent? Here’s what we know.... Candace Owens said on Sept. 30, 2025, that she had been contacted the week prior by a “source” with inside information on the Charlie Kirk investigation. From mid-September through October, Owens appeared to share information that would typically only be accessible to someone close to the investigation - including photos from inside the car Kirk was taken to the hospital in, details of Tyler Robinson’s movements on the day of Kirk’s death, alleged ballistic information, and the FBI’s investigative strategy. Was Joe Kent Owens’ “source on the inside”? Let’s break down the timeline....

🚨THREAD: Was Candace Owens’ “Inside Source” Joe Kent? Here’s what we know.... Candace Owens said on Sept. 30, 2025, that she had been contacted the week prior by a “source” with inside information on the Charlie Kirk investigation. From mid-September through October, Owens appeared to share information that would typically only be accessible to someone close to the investigation - including photos from inside the car Kirk was taken to the hospital in, details of Tyler Robinson’s movements on the day of Kirk’s death, alleged ballistic information, and the FBI’s investigative strategy. Was Joe Kent Owens’ “source on the inside”? Let’s break down the timeline....

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

73,853 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 Tyler Robinson's GRANDFATHER Speaks Out On Candace Owens Podcast 🚨 Just when you thought the official narrative couldn't get any more absurd, Candace Owens just dropped a massive bombshell on tonight's episode. She has EXCLUSIVE audio from the grandfather of Tyler Robinson—the original owner of the rifle the feds claim was used to assassinate Charlie Kirk. We need to talk about the "Magic Rifle" for a second. 🐕 The highly-trained bomb dogs completely missed it. Did their noses just "malfunction" that day? 🕵️‍♂️ Or is it just a coincidence that the Feds managed to lead rookie local cops directly to the weapon after the area had already been searched and cleared? Candace is asking the question the mainstream media refuses to touch: Does his own grandfather even believe Tyler is guilty, or is he just a convenient patsy? And if that wasn't enough, Trump is apparently having a meltdown from Air Force One. He just fired off four separate tweets calling Candace a "nobody" and saying she's "dying fast." If she’s really a nobody, why is the leader of the free world so triggered by her investigations? 🤔 The truth is making a lot of powerful people very nervous. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and Watch her full episode linked below and hear the grandfather's audio for yourself. 👇

🚨 Tyler Robinson's GRANDFATHER Speaks Out On Candace Owens Podcast 🚨 Just when you thought the official narrative couldn't get any more absurd, Candace Owens just dropped a massive bombshell on tonight's episode. She has EXCLUSIVE audio from the grandfather of Tyler Robinson—the original owner of the rifle the feds claim was used to assassinate Charlie Kirk. We need to talk about the "Magic Rifle" for a second. 🐕 The highly-trained bomb dogs completely missed it. Did their noses just "malfunction" that day? 🕵️‍♂️ Or is it just a coincidence that the Feds managed to lead rookie local cops directly to the weapon after the area had already been searched and cleared? Candace is asking the question the mainstream media refuses to touch: Does his own grandfather even believe Tyler is guilty, or is he just a convenient patsy? And if that wasn't enough, Trump is apparently having a meltdown from Air Force One. He just fired off four separate tweets calling Candace a "nobody" and saying she's "dying fast." If she’s really a nobody, why is the leader of the free world so triggered by her investigations? 🤔 The truth is making a lot of powerful people very nervous. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and Watch her full episode linked below and hear the grandfather's audio for yourself. 👇

Project Constitution

53,661 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten