Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

BREAKING: 52 MISSILES. ZERO IMPACT. Read that again. Fifty-two coordinated Iranian missiles launched at a United States Navy Carrier Strike Group. And they didn’t scratch the USS Abraham Lincoln. While an E-2D Hawkeye circled high above the Gulf of Oman… watching… scanning… calculating… the entire salvo was detected in...

1,275,116 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

‼️🇺🇸 💥USS Arleigh Burke Class Destroyer | Precision Strike Platform The USS Arleigh Burke class destroyer is one of the most powerful surface combat ships in active US Navy service. In recent operations, these destroyers have been used to conduct long range precision strikes using the Tomahawk cruise missile. How it works Arleigh Burke class destroyers are equipped with the Mk 41 Vertical Launch System. This system allows the ship to fire Tomahawk missiles directly from the sea without warning and from a safe distance. Tomahawk missile role The Tomahawk is a long range, land attack cruise missile designed for high accuracy. It can strike command centers, air defense sites, radar stations, and high value infrastructure deep inside enemy territory. Guidance is achieved through GPS, terrain matching, and advanced navigation systems. Why the US Navy uses destroyers for strikes Using destroyers for missile strikes provides flexibility and speed. These ships can operate close to conflict zones while remaining hard to detect. They allow the US to project power without relying on nearby air bases or large carrier groups. Strategic impact When a Burke class destroyer launches Tomahawk missiles, it sends a clear message of deterrence and dominance. These strikes are precise, controlled, and designed to limit collateral damage while achieving military objectives. Modern naval warfare is no longer just about ships at sea. It is about reach, accuracy, and decision making within minutes. The Arleigh Burke class destroyer represents that reality.

Defense Intelligence

25,526 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

What is Netanyahu expected to say to the president? The main problem with the ballistic-missile story is that the Iranians have caught on to the daylight—the gap—between Israel and the United States. What happened here is that Donald Trump gave his word and then broke it. "We will not allow Iran to have nuclear weapons." But he didn’t talk about conventional weapons—the ballistic missiles that threaten Israel. They threaten Israel to such an extent that Netanyahu himself, in a video announcing to the Israeli people that he was launching Operation Nation of Lions, said that two existential threats had developed. The nuclear threat—you’ve known about for years—but also the threat of thousands of ballistic missiles. What has happened since then? The Iranians are not acting at all on the nuclear front, as far as we know. They have not even extracted the enriched material buried underground. But they are very much intensifying their experiments with ballistic missiles. Either because they think it is threatening, or because, as Netanyahu says, it is an existential threat to Israel. We also have a race between the number of their missiles and the number of our missiles—and let’s say that both countries need to recover on this issue. Let’s ask the question now, and here I don’t have an answer. When Netanyahu goes to Washington to talk to Trump about this, is he talking to him about a combined attack—which seems a bit far-fetched to me, because the Americans really have no intention of getting involved in a conventional weapons conflict anywhere in the world; otherwise they would never get out of it—or is he content to give Israel permission to attack on its own, with the U.S. providing a defensive umbrella? One. Two, it should also be said, in this context, that there is a big debate in the Israeli cabinet and at the top about whether it is possible to launch an attack every six months. You cannot—unlike the nuclear project—you cannot eliminate the Iranian ballistic threat. Is it sustainable to come every six months, eight months, and launch another round, which includes them firing at us, all the flights leaving Israel, and all the implications for the economy? There is no decision in Israel. There is no decision in the U.S. that's what they will discuss.

Amit Segal

273,898 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

BREAKING: Satellite imagery shows an Iranian ballistic missile struck the AN/FPS-132 phased array radar at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. If the damage is as severe as the imagery suggests, Iran just destroyed a $1.1 billion piece of equipment that took years to build and cannot be replaced on any timeline relevant to this war. The AN/FPS-132 is not an ordinary radar. It is one of a handful of early warning sensors in the entire US global missile defence architecture. It detects ballistic missile launches at ranges exceeding 5,000 kilometres. It provides the initial tracking data that allows Patriot, THAAD, and Aegis systems to calculate intercept solutions. Without it, every other layer of missile defence in the Gulf theatre is operating with compressed reaction times and degraded situational awareness. Qatar intercepted 101 ballistic missiles during this conflict. Sixty-five missiles and twelve drones were fired at Al Udeid specifically. The base’s layered defences stopped nearly all of them. Two got through. One of them appears to have hit the single most valuable sensor in the entire region. This is the mathematics of asymmetric warfare in a single event. Iran does not need to overwhelm the defence system. It needs one missile to reach one target. The defender has to intercept everything. The attacker has to succeed once. A ballistic missile costs Iran a fraction of what the radar costs. Even at the most generous estimate of Iranian missile production costs, the exchange ratio is hundreds to one in the attacker’s favour. Now connect this to the insurance mechanism. I have written all day that the B-2 and B-52 campaigns are destroying Iran’s conventional military but not its ability to threaten asymmetric targets. This is the proof. The most heavily defended air base in the Middle East, housing CENTCOM’s forward headquarters, protected by Patriot batteries and the most advanced interception systems the US deploys, just lost its primary early warning radar to a single ballistic missile that evaded every layer. If the US military cannot protect a $1.1 billion radar inside its own most fortified base, on what basis does any reinsurer model that a tanker transiting the Strait of Hormuz is protectable by Navy escorts? The DFC insurance backstop announced hours ago promised Navy escorts would secure Gulf shipping. The AN/FPS-132 strike demonstrates that even the most sophisticated US defensive systems cannot guarantee protection against Iranian ballistic missiles in a saturation attack environment. One missile. One radar. $1.1 billion. And a defence architecture that just revealed its fundamental constraint: perfection is required, and perfection is impossible. The escorts cannot guarantee what the base defences could not. The insurance market already knew this. Now the satellite imagery proves it.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

3,109,193 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The IRGC Navy transmits “final Iranian warnings” to US Navy Arleigh Burke-class destroyers USS Frank E. Petersen Jr (DDG 121) and USS Michael Murphy (DDG 112) in the Gulf of Oman near the port of Fujairah. IRGC: US Navy ship no. 121, this is the Sepah Navy unit. You must change course and immediately return to the Indian Ocean. If you do not obey my order, you will become a target. US Navy: USS Frank E. Petersen Jr: This is coalition military ship no. 121. We are conducting a transit passage in accordance with international law. We do not intend to provoke conflict. IRGC: This is the Sepah Navy unit. Final warning. Final warning. Final warning. 🔴Research has revealed that the American attempt was an extremely risky move that could easily have turned into a disaster for the United States and its military. — The destroyers were only minutes away from complete destruction after Iranian cruise missiles locked onto the ship and attack drones were deployed. — When the two destroyers and escort reached the mouth of the Persian Gulf, Iranian cruise missiles locked onto them, and the destroyers were given only 30 minutes to withdraw. The ships immediately retreated. — They tried to use electronic warfare tactics, including turning off the position reporting system, in an attempt to deceive the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Navy (IRGC) forces. — By faking their identity, they tried to present themselves as commercial ships from Oman, allegedly engaged in coastal traffic in the southern part of the Gulf of Oman, the investigation revealed. — The destroyers also chose a route very close to the coast and through shallow waters, taking a great risk to pass that way and enter the Persian Gulf by concealment and deception, expecting that Iranian forces might be negligent during the truce. — However, the IRGC naval forces, while patrolling around Fujairah, had already detected the deception and took swift action. — USS Frank Peterson first tried to continue its course but immediately realized that the radar systems of the cruise missiles had locked onto it and was stopped by IRGC ships. — At the same time, IRGC drones were flying over the two destroyers. USS Peterson then received a notification on international channel 16 that it must either return and leave the area within thirty minutes or become a target of Iranian armed forces. — As the destroyer insisted on continuing, it was given a final warning, so the destroyer was only minutes away from destruction. — According to the investigation, the conversation between the IRGC naval forces operators and the American destroyers indicates their full compliance with the IRGC warning. — The investigation further revealed that the failed operation was specifically designed to exploit the truce to test the readiness of the Iranian naval forces. — It also aimed to influence negotiators in Islamabad, where important talks between Iran and the US were taking place under Pakistani mediation. — According to the investigation findings, the operation of the two American destroyers failed and did not achieve any of the set objectives. — Support helicopters also flew over the destroyers. At the same time as the warning to these destroyers, all ships in the area were ordered to stay at least 10 miles away from them so that, in case IRGC fired at them, surrounding ships would be protected. — The investigation also stated that the highly risky and failed American operation was the result of the dismissal of the highest military generals from the army by order of Secretary of War Hegset in the last days.

Sprinter Press Agency

19,476 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨WATCH THIS NOW OR BOOKMARK IT IMMEDIATELY⚠️ This video is a reminder of something many Americans still underestimate… The enemy we are facing is not a band of cave fighters with spears and rocks. What you are looking at here is Iran’s 3rd Khordad mobile surface-to-air missile system… a truck-mounted air defense platform designed to detect, track, and destroy aircraft, drones, and cruise missiles at distances that can reach well over 100 km depending on the missile configuration. This system was developed specifically to counter modern Western air power. And it has already proven it can do damage… it was the same class of Iranian air defense system that shot down a U.S. surveillance drone in 2019. Iran has spent decades building a layered military apparatus. Mobile missile launchers Underground missile cities Long-range ballistic weapons Drone swarms Integrated air defense systems like this one And they are not doing it alone. Russia has transferred radar technology and missile engineering experience. China has provided electronics, sensors, and industrial manufacturing capability. That means the battlefield we are dealing with is not primitive… it is a hybrid military ecosystem built by three industrial powers. That matters. 🚨Because arrogance in war gets people killed. When Americans see footage like this, it should not produce panic… but it should produce respect for the complexity of the threat. These systems are designed to challenge the most advanced air force in the world. And there is another reality most people don’t like to talk about. The battlefield is not always overseas. Iran’s strategy has long included sleeper networks and proxy infrastructure outside the Middle East… cells that can be activated for sabotage, intelligence gathering, or disruption if a full regional war erupts. War in the 21st century is not just missiles and jets. It is intelligence networks industrial supply chains cyber warfare and influence operations inside rival nations. So when you see footage like this Iranian system rolling across the desert… understand what it represents. A state that has spent decades preparing for confrontation with the United States and Israel. Never underestimate your adversary. History shows that arrogance in war is one of the fastest paths to disaster. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

13,043 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten