Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

🚨 BREAKING: Bessent Couldn't Name The Case. Asked what ongoing litigation prevents him from discussing Trump's audit status, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the matter was tied up in court. Then Rep. Linda Sánchez asked a simple follow-up: Which case? He couldn't name it. Sánchez pointed out that the... show more

Brian Allen

302,512 subscribers

208,412 просмотров • 22 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 BREAKING: Sánchez Came Prepared. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claimed ongoing litigation prevented him from answering questions about Trump's audit status. Then Rep. Linda Sánchez pulled out a court order and cited Supreme Court precedent saying ongoing litigation does not automatically bar testimony before Congress. 🔥 That's when the argument shifted. The debate was no longer about Trump's taxes. It was about whether "ongoing litigation" was a legitimate legal reason... or an excuse not to answer the question.

🚨 BREAKING: Sánchez Came Prepared. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claimed ongoing litigation prevented him from answering questions about Trump's audit status. Then Rep. Linda Sánchez pulled out a court order and cited Supreme Court precedent saying ongoing litigation does not automatically bar testimony before Congress. 🔥 That's when the argument shifted. The debate was no longer about Trump's taxes. It was about whether "ongoing litigation" was a legitimate legal reason... or an excuse not to answer the question.

Brian Allen

95,624 просмотров • 22 дней назад

Bessent tells Rep. Sanchez he can't comment on Trump's tax audit immunity deal because of ongoing litigation -- but he can't name the ongoing litigation 🙃

Bessent tells Rep. Sanchez he can't comment on Trump's tax audit immunity deal because of ongoing litigation -- but he can't name the ongoing litigation 🙃

Aaron Rupar

35,250 просмотров • 22 дней назад

🚨 BREAKING: Bessent Wouldn't Answer The Hypothetical. Rep. Linda Sánchez asked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent a simple question: If Joe Biden filed an amended tax return claiming the government owed him $1 billion, would that be audited? 🔥 Bessent refused to answer. That's what made the exchange notable. Sánchez wasn't really asking about Biden. She was testing whether the standard being applied to Trump would be applied to anyone else. And Bessent wouldn't engage.

🚨 BREAKING: Bessent Wouldn't Answer The Hypothetical. Rep. Linda Sánchez asked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent a simple question: If Joe Biden filed an amended tax return claiming the government owed him $1 billion, would that be audited? 🔥 Bessent refused to answer. That's what made the exchange notable. Sánchez wasn't really asking about Biden. She was testing whether the standard being applied to Trump would be applied to anyone else. And Bessent wouldn't engage.

Brian Allen

68,098 просмотров • 22 дней назад

BESSENT: I'm unable to discuss this because of ongoing litigation WHITEHOUSE: Was there any consideration to the govt in return for the benefits of no audit and no investigation? BESSENT: Again, I'm unable to comment WHITEHOUSE: 🤷 Mr Chairman, this makes no sense at all

BESSENT: I'm unable to discuss this because of ongoing litigation WHITEHOUSE: Was there any consideration to the govt in return for the benefits of no audit and no investigation? BESSENT: Again, I'm unable to comment WHITEHOUSE: 🤷 Mr Chairman, this makes no sense at all

Aaron Rupar

75,182 просмотров • 23 дней назад

President Trump said the stock market kept ripping every time peace was discussed and joked that the market is “more brilliant than anybody” except him. He then asked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent if the market was smarter than him and Bessent replied “No, sir.”

President Trump said the stock market kept ripping every time peace was discussed and joked that the market is “more brilliant than anybody” except him. He then asked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent if the market was smarter than him and Bessent replied “No, sir.”

Shay Boloor

155,043 просмотров • 9 дней назад

I was on the BBC earlier this week to discuss the ongoing same-sex marriage litigation before the Supreme Court of India, in which Kotia and I are petitioners

I was on the BBC earlier this week to discuss the ongoing same-sex marriage litigation before the Supreme Court of India, in which Kotia and I are petitioners

Utkarsh Saxena

79,318 просмотров • 3 лет назад

#BREAKING: Hayes: “Acting AG Todd Blanche told Congress not to worry about the $1.8 billion slush fund for insurrectionists…The DOJ then told the court the same thing—don’t worry, it’s moot, it’s dropped, and then last week, the judge said okay, fine, put it in writing. She ordered Blanche and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and an associate AG to all sign ‘a declaration under the penalty of perjury, they will not take any action to create or operate the anti-weaponization fund and that the anti-weaponization fund will not proceed in any manner or under any name.’ Well, today was the deadline for that and guess what? They came back to the court and they said no, we’re NOT doing it. We’re NOT filing any declaration to officially kill the fund, which probably means the slush fund is NOT dead.”🙄🤦‍♀️

#BREAKING: Hayes: “Acting AG Todd Blanche told Congress not to worry about the $1.8 billion slush fund for insurrectionists…The DOJ then told the court the same thing—don’t worry, it’s moot, it’s dropped, and then last week, the judge said okay, fine, put it in writing. She ordered Blanche and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and an associate AG to all sign ‘a declaration under the penalty of perjury, they will not take any action to create or operate the anti-weaponization fund and that the anti-weaponization fund will not proceed in any manner or under any name.’ Well, today was the deadline for that and guess what? They came back to the court and they said no, we’re NOT doing it. We’re NOT filing any declaration to officially kill the fund, which probably means the slush fund is NOT dead.”🙄🤦‍♀️

Emoluments Clause

521,289 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Rep Ben Cline asks AG Pam Bondi why they're STILL enforcing a registration requirement, and the felony criminal penalties that come with it, for NFA items despite the "tax" being removed as of January 1st this year. She responds that it's "pending litigation" which is technically true. However, it's only true because her DOJ hasn't dropped their support of it in court. If they did then the registration and the "pending litigation" would just go away. It really is that simple... #NFA #PamBondi #AG #DOW #silencer #SBR #suppressors #OSHA #safety

Rep Ben Cline asks AG Pam Bondi why they're STILL enforcing a registration requirement, and the felony criminal penalties that come with it, for NFA items despite the "tax" being removed as of January 1st this year. She responds that it's "pending litigation" which is technically true. However, it's only true because her DOJ hasn't dropped their support of it in court. If they did then the registration and the "pending litigation" would just go away. It really is that simple... #NFA #PamBondi #AG #DOW #silencer #SBR #suppressors #OSHA #safety

Mrgunsngear

86,910 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Bove: I think the characterizations that you just made are both political.. and they’re also tied up in ongoing litigation. Welch: How is it political to state who got the most votes in the election?

Bove: I think the characterizations that you just made are both political.. and they’re also tied up in ongoing litigation. Welch: How is it political to state who got the most votes in the election?

Acyn

103,752 просмотров • 1 год назад

Treasury Secretary Bessent (Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent): "We believe that the shutdown may start costing the U.S. economy up to $15 billion dollars a day."

Treasury Secretary Bessent (Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent): "We believe that the shutdown may start costing the U.S. economy up to $15 billion dollars a day."

CSPAN

15,079 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Tuesday that President Donald Trump was willing to let TikTok go dark, and it was “what turned the tide” in the deal framework with China.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Tuesday that President Donald Trump was willing to let TikTok go dark, and it was “what turned the tide” in the deal framework with China.

CNBC

24,042 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨 WTF?! President Trump reveals the woman who walked by the White House and sued him to block the ballroom national security project is also involved in OTHER litigation around DC Throw the case out! “She is highly litigious, a serial plaintiff, and said she was bothered in her walking by the White House, but didn't state her involvement in numerous places around D.C. Why then is she involved in litigation on other Developments in far distant parts of D.C. Is she walking there, too? How is she walking on a totally closed street at the Treasury Building — Nobody is allowed to walk there? She never saw a Building, because there is no Building there.“

🚨 WTF?! President Trump reveals the woman who walked by the White House and sued him to block the ballroom national security project is also involved in OTHER litigation around DC Throw the case out! “She is highly litigious, a serial plaintiff, and said she was bothered in her walking by the White House, but didn't state her involvement in numerous places around D.C. Why then is she involved in litigation on other Developments in far distant parts of D.C. Is she walking there, too? How is she walking on a totally closed street at the Treasury Building — Nobody is allowed to walk there? She never saw a Building, because there is no Building there.“

Eric Daugherty

711,464 просмотров • 8 дней назад

🚨 BREAKING: In a startling development, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has issued a dire warning about the ongoing government shutdown, stating that it could cost the U.S. economy up to $15 billion per day. Bessent urged moderate Democrats to "be heroes" and end the shutdown.

🚨 BREAKING: In a startling development, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has issued a dire warning about the ongoing government shutdown, stating that it could cost the U.S. economy up to $15 billion per day. Bessent urged moderate Democrats to "be heroes" and end the shutdown.

FAN TRUMP ARMY

856,855 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the independence of the Fed was based on Americans' trust of the central bank, which it lost because it allowed inflation to get out of control

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the independence of the Fed was based on Americans' trust of the central bank, which it lost because it allowed inflation to get out of control

Reuters

62,729 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨Tom Homan responds to criticisms of his “judges” comments: "I don't care what other judges think — as far as this case, we're going to continue to raise public safety threats and national security threats." "I understand this case is in litigation through the Alien Enemies Act and we will abide by the court order that's litigated." "But my point was, despite what he thinks, we're going to keep targeting the worst of the worst of the worst, which we've been doing since day one, and deporting from the United States to the various laws on the books." "We're not making this up. The Alien Enemies Act was actually a federal law. It's the statutes enacted by Congress and signed by a president. Now, that's under litigation. But put that aside. We still have title eight authority to remove illegal aliens United States. And we're going to continue to concentrate on those who were the biggest threat to to our communities and public safety threats."

🚨Tom Homan responds to criticisms of his “judges” comments: "I don't care what other judges think — as far as this case, we're going to continue to raise public safety threats and national security threats." "I understand this case is in litigation through the Alien Enemies Act and we will abide by the court order that's litigated." "But my point was, despite what he thinks, we're going to keep targeting the worst of the worst of the worst, which we've been doing since day one, and deporting from the United States to the various laws on the books." "We're not making this up. The Alien Enemies Act was actually a federal law. It's the statutes enacted by Congress and signed by a president. Now, that's under litigation. But put that aside. We still have title eight authority to remove illegal aliens United States. And we're going to continue to concentrate on those who were the biggest threat to to our communities and public safety threats."

Western Lensman

105,414 просмотров • 1 год назад

🔴 BREAKING: Pawan Khera Sues Arnab Goswami for Saying "Congress Sided With Nation’s Enemy During Operation Sindoor" ~ Defamation case filed in personal capacity, but Arnab’s comment was aimed at the Congress party ~ Statement was made during live broadcast on Republic TV What exactly did Arnab say that wasn’t true? When facts sting, is litigation the only defence?

🔴 BREAKING: Pawan Khera Sues Arnab Goswami for Saying "Congress Sided With Nation’s Enemy During Operation Sindoor" ~ Defamation case filed in personal capacity, but Arnab’s comment was aimed at the Congress party ~ Statement was made during live broadcast on Republic TV What exactly did Arnab say that wasn’t true? When facts sting, is litigation the only defence?

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

168,763 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Jennings: What lengths did the previous admin go to to tell the American people what happened with Epstein? Taylor: SDNY was still investigating the case. And the reports are that they were investigating potential coconspirators. And then the administration sent 20 people to get the files from S.D.N.Y. Then what did they do? They did a control-f, looked for trump's name. And then in July, they said, case is over, case closed. But wait, the case is back open tonight. Is that a coincidence or does it have to do with trump?

Jennings: What lengths did the previous admin go to to tell the American people what happened with Epstein? Taylor: SDNY was still investigating the case. And the reports are that they were investigating potential coconspirators. And then the administration sent 20 people to get the files from S.D.N.Y. Then what did they do? They did a control-f, looked for trump's name. And then in July, they said, case is over, case closed. But wait, the case is back open tonight. Is that a coincidence or does it have to do with trump?

Acyn

234,623 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Simon Harris previously couldn't explain why a rapist was let into Ireland as he said he wasn't aware of the case. Asked again 4 weeks later he said "I don't have that information today tbh." "That's a matter for our immigration system & those who enforce it to speak to that."

Simon Harris previously couldn't explain why a rapist was let into Ireland as he said he wasn't aware of the case. Asked again 4 weeks later he said "I don't have that information today tbh." "That's a matter for our immigration system & those who enforce it to speak to that."

gript

152,778 просмотров • 1 год назад

CNN’s Dana Bash got embarrassed live on her own show as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flat out rejected her entire framing on tariffs. She tried to turn it into a $134 billion reckoning, but Bessent came armed with the facts. She was left scrambling. BASH: “I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” BESSENT: “Well Dana that’s not the big question.” BESSENT: “Let’s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president’s authority under the IEEPA tariffs. BESSENT: “We have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariffs, section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it’s a big question, that’s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn’t even address that.” BESSENT: “The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.” BESSENT: “And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the supreme court did not address refunds.” BASH: “Sure. They didn’t address refunds. That is clearly going to be up to to you, which—” BESSENT: “No, no, no Dana, it is not up to me.” BASH: “Not…not…you…” BESSENT: “It is not up to the administration. It is up to the lower court. Let’s just be clear on that.” The “big question” wasn’t so big after all.

CNN’s Dana Bash got embarrassed live on her own show as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flat out rejected her entire framing on tariffs. She tried to turn it into a $134 billion reckoning, but Bessent came armed with the facts. She was left scrambling. BASH: “I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” BESSENT: “Well Dana that’s not the big question.” BESSENT: “Let’s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president’s authority under the IEEPA tariffs. BESSENT: “We have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariffs, section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it’s a big question, that’s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn’t even address that.” BESSENT: “The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.” BESSENT: “And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the supreme court did not address refunds.” BASH: “Sure. They didn’t address refunds. That is clearly going to be up to to you, which—” BESSENT: “No, no, no Dana, it is not up to me.” BASH: “Not…not…you…” BESSENT: “It is not up to the administration. It is up to the lower court. Let’s just be clear on that.” The “big question” wasn’t so big after all.

Overton

245,862 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

VAN HOLLEN: I assume you mean that "zealous advocacy" does not mean telling untruths to courts of law. But if that's not the case, what did you mean by saying he's not a "zealous advocate"? BONDI: This is all pending litigation and I can't discuss pending litigation ... but the timing of it I find suspect. He takes hits at Emil Bove who is one of the best human beings I know.

VAN HOLLEN: I assume you mean that "zealous advocacy" does not mean telling untruths to courts of law. But if that's not the case, what did you mean by saying he's not a "zealous advocate"? BONDI: This is all pending litigation and I can't discuss pending litigation ... but the timing of it I find suspect. He takes hits at Emil Bove who is one of the best human beings I know.

Aaron Rupar

42,303 просмотров • 1 год назад