正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🇩🇪🇺🇸🇪🇺 BREAKING: Germany has reopened a major debate over fitting its next-generation F127 air-defense frigates with the U.S.-made AEGIS combat system and SPY-6 radar, amid rising concerns over Europe’s growing dependence on American defense technology. Reports say German defense circles are increasingly divided between combat-ready U.S. systems, offering proven...

514,297 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

36 条评论

Military Arms 的头像
Military Arms6 个月前

I have a solution. We should deny all sales of our advanced military tech to any nation such as Germany trash talking us. Watch them come groveling back on their knees.

Gandalv 的头像
Gandalv6 个月前

There is no dilemma here. Only someone locked in a Cold War bunker since 1983 could call this a dilemma. The U.S. today is a clone of Russia, the country Europe spent fifty years arming against. It threatens allies, pulls security guarantees on a whim, and treats European sovereignty as an inconvenience. The only difference between Washington and Moscow right now is the Wi-Fi speed. Russia needs fifteen years to reach the military capability of a mid-sized European state. They are not the urgent threat. American dependency is. Build European. Take the time. Pay the costs. The alternative is to stay hostage to a government that has made its contempt for Europe loudly and repeatedly clear. This was never a close call.

john cook 的头像
john cook6 个月前

The price of the AEGIS and SPY 6 systems just tripled in price for all you wankers and none for Spain

SB 的头像
SB6 个月前

Sure, go ahead and try to build your own replacement for Aegis and Spy-6. It'll cost you more than you can afford and take years. In the meanwhile your ships will be vulnerable and by the time you build something as good, the US will already have the next generation.

Next Gen EV | Ralph Panhuyzen 的头像
Next Gen EV | Ralph Panhuyzen6 个月前

Start developing Europe's own! Even if it takes years and we have to settle for the older systems for now. There is NO alternative, if we don't want to stay dependent and taken hostage by a mentally highly unstable American president.

Constantly Underfoot 的头像
Constantly Underfoot6 个月前

Yes, NATO countries should use less capable tech to defend themselves at the very moment Russia & China's tech has been exposed as subpar to American tech. - The continued brilliance of EU military strategists, believing capability is a simple plug-and-play game.

THE EUROPEAN 的头像
THE EUROPEAN6 个月前

Buy European. Any politician buying 🇺🇸 weapons in this situation is stupid and should be hold accountable

Corvus 的头像
Corvus6 个月前

Europe wants tech sovereignty, fair enough. But right now, no European radar matches SPY-6 for real upper-tier BMD on a frigate. SMART-L spots 'em far away... then hands the kill to US systems anyway. Germany picking proven capability over 'soon alternatives isn't weakness—it's not wanting to get sunk while waiting.

Clayton_Bigsby 的头像
Clayton_Bigsby6 个月前

It will take them years and billions to build their own and by the time they do it will have been surpassed by American technology. They simply don’t have the money or the resources to compete.

defensayseguridad.es 的头像
defensayseguridad.es6 个月前

Thx for the mention, @Defence_Index

Defence Index 的头像
Defence Index6 个月前

♥️♥️♥️

Leonard Joyner 的头像
Leonard Joyner6 个月前

BLUF, they make a dumb choice, and their ships will be combat ineffective for the next two decades. Way to go, team.

Roger Meisal 的头像
Roger Meisal6 个月前

No brainer. Use what is best right now. Develop in Europe something much better and replace when ready.

Andy Hutton 的头像
Andy Hutton6 个月前

Germany: *watches American military thoroughly dismantle Iranian military, air defenses, nuclear sites, ballistic missiles, etc. in two weeks* *thinks maybe American technology isn't what we want*

Warships IFR 的头像
Warships IFR6 个月前

Good morning. Would be useful if you also mentioned @StephenJagger4 as the creator of the video, which btw we on @WarshipsIFR commissioned him to do. And posted it originally. Permission to use should be sought prior to use. Here it is in our original post

Paul Cullivan 的头像
Paul Cullivan6 个月前

Excellent idea. Spend decades trying to replicate existing technology. Which will be obsolete by the time it’s ready to deploy. Europe in a nutshell.

Dominique Bertrand 的头像
Dominique Bertrand6 个月前

Qu'ils choisissent l'AEGIS comme ça, le moment voulu les américains leur couperont certaines fonctionnalités en fonction de la situation. Le matin on coupe les F-35 et l'après-midi les frégates AEGIS...et le lendemain, on leur dit que finalement il n'y a rien dans les bombes atomiques B-61 de l'OTAN. Vive la vraie souveraineté dans le domaine militaire opérationnel et de l'industrie militaire. Seule la France en Europe peut s'en targuer. Cela nous a couté et nous coutera cher mais rien ne vaut la liberté.

Steel Penn 的头像
Steel Penn6 个月前

When Germany believes Iran "is not our war" and does not have the guts to board a ghost oil ship with a Russian escort warship, what is the purpose of new navy vessels? Fishing?

TontonMythik 的头像
TontonMythik6 个月前

Germany’s natural reflex is « buy American or Israeli if we don’t have it », they’ll never buy European.

Jonathan 的头像
Jonathan6 个月前

Germany killed their nuclear, they will kill their US-Made defense. They have no problem comitting economic suicide, they’ll have no problem comitting military suicide. Leftists rule the EU. Failure is unavoidable.

Patrick 🇳🇱 的头像
Patrick 🇳🇱6 个月前

1. Buy what's available. 2. Develop your own. 3. Switch when your own works 100%.

Kaiko 🇩🇪🇺🇦🇮🇱🇳🇱🇺🇸 的头像
Kaiko 🇩🇪🇺🇦🇮🇱🇳🇱🇺🇸6 个月前

Frigate vs Destroyer?

Vittorio Vezzola 的头像
Vittorio Vezzola6 个月前

I don’t know how much adaptation must be done on F127, but there are some different European platforms for the combat management system and for the radar that have similar capabilities than Aegis + SPY-6

GrumpyHobbit 的头像
GrumpyHobbit6 个月前

The T45 fit is good and its European. Currently being upgraded for BMD. We should be building the same designs and building them in quantity to amortize the NRE. US purchases should be for unique capability only and that should be reduced as much as possible going forward.

Antonio Falconieri 的头像
Antonio Falconieri6 个月前

@clyntonK1 Air defense frigates are wasteful. Even 4th rate nations can now field enough land based cruise missiles and drones to exhaust the launch cells of a frigate in a matter of hours. Surface warfare ships like this are a waste.

thelaine thelaine 的头像
thelaine thelaine6 个月前

They can make their own everything, but not in the short term and not at a price they can afford. They need to get their energy policy straight before anything else.

D A 的头像
D A6 个月前

IF the ship is going to spend 90% of its time in dock waiting for repairs, then it doesn't really need the best air defense radar system.

Brandon Anderson 的头像
Brandon Anderson6 个月前

Honestly, we shouldn’t be selling these systems to foreign countries anyway. AEGIS is in high demand, they are difficult to build and we need them for our own ships.

Mindaugas Svedas 的头像
Mindaugas Svedas6 个月前

Sovereignty is more important. We already saw how unreliable USA is.

Michael Johnson 的头像
Michael Johnson6 个月前

If only Europe had met their commitment on military spending, they might have actually developed systems that worked effectively. Oh well, best of luck to them

MCForce 的头像
MCForce6 个月前

Sovereignty has endless value

Uncle Curtis 🇺🇸 的头像
Uncle Curtis 🇺🇸6 个月前

I guess this is good news for all the European manufacturers of combat radar... <stand by> I have just been informed that there are no European companies capable of fielding a combat radar system, but Germany has implemented a mandatory struggle session for each US purchase.

Arnie 🇺🇲 的头像
Arnie 🇺🇲6 个月前

The ignorance displayed by europeans in the replies is staggering. You have no equivalent system and to build one would take years. It's like you just woke up and started demanded indigenous technology when none exist and threats on the rise. You people are learning some hard lessons 😂

Claus 的头像
Claus6 个月前

Buy European !

Absolute Resolve Fella 的头像
Absolute Resolve Fella6 个月前

Could always just not have a Navy, seems to be the trend in Europe

Marco 🇪🇺 的头像
Marco 🇪🇺6 个月前

BUY Italian FREMM as we buy German from Rheinmetal

相关视频

JUST IN: 🇷🇺🇩🇪 Putin May Have Made A Historic Mistake, Germany Is Rebuilding A Military Russia Could Fear A warning emerging from Russian strategic circles is becoming increasingly significant: Moscow’s confrontation with Europe may have awakened a power that had deliberately kept its military ambitions restrained for decades. Germany is now rapidly rebuilding the Bundeswehr, and the transformation could fundamentally change Europe’s military balance. 🔰 €108+ billion in 2026 defense related spending, with the core defense budget alone around €82.7 billion. 🔰 Defense spending is planned to rise toward 3.5% of GDP by 2029. 🔰 A major expansion of Germany’s military personnel and combat readiness. 🔰 F-35A stealth fighters for high end strike and NATO nuclear sharing missions. 🔰 Additional Eurofighters and major upgrades to Germany’s existing fleet. 🔰 Leopard 2A8 main battle tanks and expanded armored forces. 🔰 Boxer armored vehicles and modern mechanized formations. 🔰 IRIS-T SLM and Patriot air defense systems. 🔰 Tomahawk long range cruise missiles. 🔰 Development of next generation European long range strike weapons. 🔰 Cooperation with Britain on advanced cruise missile and hypersonic weapons. 🔰 Massive investment in drones, satellites, electronic warfare, communications and battlefield networks. 🔰 A rapidly expanding German defense industrial base capable of producing weapons at much greater scale. Germany’s military spending has already surged. SIPRI estimates German military expenditure reached roughly $114 billion in 2025, a 24% increase from the previous year. But the biggest change may still be ahead. Germany has the economic power, industrial capacity and technological base to sustain a major military buildup for years. If Berlin follows through on its plans, Germany could enter the 2030s with stealth fighters, advanced air defenses, large armored formations, long range precision weapons, drones, modern command networks and a defense industry operating at a completely different scale. And Russia may have helped trigger it. Moscow wanted to reshape Europe’s security order. Instead, its confrontation with Europe may be creating a far more militarized Germany, one that could become increasingly assertive and much harder for Russia to ignore. The Germany of the future may look very different from the Germany Russia faced before the Ukraine war. 👀 Putin may have awakened Europe’s sleeping giant.

War Radar

277,264 次观看 • 2 个月前

TRUMP UNVEILS GOLDEN DOME MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEM. President Donald Trump said he had selected a design for the $175 billion Golden Dome missile defense shield and named U.S. Space Force General Michael Guetlein, to lead the ambitious program aimed at blocking threats from China and Russia. This is a Manhattan Project-scale mission, one that is both urgent and crucial to America’s security. Lockheed Martin is ready to partner with the best in industry, emerging, and large technology companies together to safeguard our nation. We lead the MDA’s National Team for C2BMC and successfully built the world’s most powerful missile defense software network, which connects forces around the world 24x7. This operationally proven, layered missile defense system allows commanders to make synchronized decisions about threats at any range, in any phase of flight, from any location in the world. From surface to space, Lockheed Martin is delivering combat-proven layered defense solutions so the U.S. and allies can stay ahead of accelerating threats. Our integrated air and missile defense systems provide the most advanced radars and sensors, command and control networks, satellites, targets, interceptors, and directed energy systems in the world. NGI is a first line of defense, tip-to-tail interceptor within the Missile Defense Agency’s Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) system. PAC-3 is a world leader in defense technology for air defense missile systems, delivering unmatched capability across multi-domain environments. SBIRS serves as a critical missile warning system, utilizing infrared surveillance for early missile detection. The Long Range Discrimination Radar (LRDR) program is the backbone of the Missile Defense Agency’s layered defense strategy to protect the U.S. homeland from ballistic missile attacks. Sentinel A4 is a high-performance surveillance radar, replacing the legacy Sentinel A3, enhancing defense against cruise missiles, UAVs, and air threats. Aegis Combat System, the Navy’s most modern surface combat system, employs the SPY-1 radar for threat detection at sea. Experience the combat-proven THAAD, a top missile interceptor, protecting against ballistic threats with unmatched effectiveness. The F-35 is the most advanced node in a 21st Century Security network-centric architecture with the ability to securely connect high-tech platforms to share information across every domain. With a combination of all these advanced weapons, A.I., direct energy weapons (DEWs), and the finest aircraft and military in the world, let's just say this is like Skynet from Terminator movies on steroids. America will have the best country missle defense system in the world. Source: Lockheed Martin

The SCIF

21,781 次观看 • 1 年前