Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

BREAKING: Senator Ron Johnson reveals a high-quality Vax vs. Unvax study will FINALLY be made public Tuesday. Originally conducted in 2000, the results have been buried for 25 years—until now. And what did the data suggest? “…the vaccinated population [is] far more prone to chronic illness than people completely... show more

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,972,371 subscribers

526,705 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Здоровье и велнес Наука и технологии Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

A landmark, long-suppressed study from a prestigious pro-vaccine institution is set to be unveiled at a U.S. Senate hearing next Tuesday. The research, which compares health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated individuals, reportedly reveals that the vaccinated population is significantly more prone to chronic illness. Senator Ron Johnson will hold the hearing, where attorney Aaron Siri will testify and formally enter the study into the congressional record. According to Del Bigtree of The HighWire, the study was conducted by a high-integrity healthcare facility that initially undertook the research to disprove claims of vaccine-related harm. However, upon discovering damning results in 2020 that allegedly implicated vaccines in the chronic disease epidemic, the institution chose to bury the findings. The revelation of this study is being hailed as a potential game-changer for the medical freedom movement. To coincide with the hearing, the trailer for a new documentary detailing the study's suppression, titled "An Inconvenient Study," will premiere. The full film is scheduled for release on October 3rd. This development represents the first time a major, ostensibly impartial medical institution has conducted such a comparative analysis, with results that could fundamentally challenge the established narrative on vaccine safety.

A landmark, long-suppressed study from a prestigious pro-vaccine institution is set to be unveiled at a U.S. Senate hearing next Tuesday. The research, which compares health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated individuals, reportedly reveals that the vaccinated population is significantly more prone to chronic illness. Senator Ron Johnson will hold the hearing, where attorney Aaron Siri will testify and formally enter the study into the congressional record. According to Del Bigtree of The HighWire, the study was conducted by a high-integrity healthcare facility that initially undertook the research to disprove claims of vaccine-related harm. However, upon discovering damning results in 2020 that allegedly implicated vaccines in the chronic disease epidemic, the institution chose to bury the findings. The revelation of this study is being hailed as a potential game-changer for the medical freedom movement. To coincide with the hearing, the trailer for a new documentary detailing the study's suppression, titled "An Inconvenient Study," will premiere. The full film is scheduled for release on October 3rd. This development represents the first time a major, ostensibly impartial medical institution has conducted such a comparative analysis, with results that could fundamentally challenge the established narrative on vaccine safety.

Camus

46,117 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

A suppressed study, hidden from the public, reveals a devastating truth the establishment never wanted you to hear. According to children's health advocate Mary Holland, a pivotal hearing uncovered an unpublished study from the Henry Ford Center in Detroit. Conducted explicitly to PROVE vaccinated children are healthier, the results instead showed the opposite. The findings? Vaccinated children are two and a half times more likely to suffer from a chronic disease. This includes: - Autism - Asthma - ADHD - Severe Allergies This critical data was never published. It was brought to light by legal experts and presented by Senator Ron Johnson, who is now blowing the whistle on this concealment. We are at the beginning of a global reckoning. For decades, the explosive rise in chronic childhood illness has paralleled the explosive rise of the vaccine schedule. The plausible connection is now more than plausible—it is supported by their own suppressed research. The truth is finally coming out. The question is, will you listen?

A suppressed study, hidden from the public, reveals a devastating truth the establishment never wanted you to hear. According to children's health advocate Mary Holland, a pivotal hearing uncovered an unpublished study from the Henry Ford Center in Detroit. Conducted explicitly to PROVE vaccinated children are healthier, the results instead showed the opposite. The findings? Vaccinated children are two and a half times more likely to suffer from a chronic disease. This includes: - Autism - Asthma - ADHD - Severe Allergies This critical data was never published. It was brought to light by legal experts and presented by Senator Ron Johnson, who is now blowing the whistle on this concealment. We are at the beginning of a global reckoning. For decades, the explosive rise in chronic childhood illness has paralleled the explosive rise of the vaccine schedule. The plausible connection is now more than plausible—it is supported by their own suppressed research. The truth is finally coming out. The question is, will you listen?

Camus

112,057 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

👀Have you seen the study? "The only real problem with this study, and why it didn't get submitted for publication, is that its findings did not fit the belief that vaccines are safe--- a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted." -Aaron Siri Esq., in Senate Hearing on Corruption in Science, held by Senator Ron Johnson last week. Link to the study below.

👀Have you seen the study? "The only real problem with this study, and why it didn't get submitted for publication, is that its findings did not fit the belief that vaccines are safe--- a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted." -Aaron Siri Esq., in Senate Hearing on Corruption in Science, held by Senator Ron Johnson last week. Link to the study below.

The HighWire

88,165 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

As Senator Johnson stated at today’s hearing, I will be testifying this Tuesday at a Senate hearing on the corruption of vaccine science, including about a robust study conducted by a major institution that inconveniently found far higher rates of various chronic diseases among vaccinated children and was therefore filed away. If you are in DC, the hearing is open to the public. Hart Senate Office Building, Room SH-216, at 2 p.m. on Tuesday Sept 9. Don’t miss it!

As Senator Johnson stated at today’s hearing, I will be testifying this Tuesday at a Senate hearing on the corruption of vaccine science, including about a robust study conducted by a major institution that inconveniently found far higher rates of various chronic diseases among vaccinated children and was therefore filed away. If you are in DC, the hearing is open to the public. Hart Senate Office Building, Room SH-216, at 2 p.m. on Tuesday Sept 9. Don’t miss it!

Aaron Siri

109,394 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

For decades, they refused to compare vaccinated vs. unvaccinated kids. A top scientist finally did—and the results were so damning they were hidden... until now. 🚨 Aaron Siri testifies on the study & we drop the trailer for the film, 'An Inconvenient Study,' SEPT 9TH! The cover-up ends now. DETAILS BELOW

For decades, they refused to compare vaccinated vs. unvaccinated kids. A top scientist finally did—and the results were so damning they were hidden... until now. 🚨 Aaron Siri testifies on the study & we drop the trailer for the film, 'An Inconvenient Study,' SEPT 9TH! The cover-up ends now. DETAILS BELOW

The HighWire

410,068 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Look closely at this graph — the results are jaw-dropping. Vaccinated kids: 57% chance of developing a chronic disease in the first 10 years of life. Unvaccinated kids: Only 17%. “That should shock everyone.” This figure is nearly identical to national data, which says that 54% of American children now have at least one chronic condition. The graph comes from a vax vs. unvax study that’s been buried for five years. Dr. Marcus Zervos led the research but chose not to publish it, admitting, “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.”

Look closely at this graph — the results are jaw-dropping. Vaccinated kids: 57% chance of developing a chronic disease in the first 10 years of life. Unvaccinated kids: Only 17%. “That should shock everyone.” This figure is nearly identical to national data, which says that 54% of American children now have at least one chronic condition. The graph comes from a vax vs. unvax study that’s been buried for five years. Dr. Marcus Zervos led the research but chose not to publish it, admitting, “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

361,246 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

REPORT: A buried study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children has finally come to light—and the results are shattering the vaccine narrative. Featured in Del Bigtree’s new film An Inconvenient Study ( this long-suppressed data reveals what public health agencies have refused to examine for decades: vaccinated children suffer dramatically higher rates of chronic illness. Led by Dr. Marcus Zervos of Henry Ford Health, the study found vaccinated kids were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma, nearly six times more likely to develop autoimmune disorders, and over five times more likely to suffer neurodevelopmental issues. Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, learning disabilities, or behavioral disorders. When confronted with the findings, Dr. Zervos admitted on hidden camera, “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.” This could be the biggest medical cover-up of our time. See the data for yourself in 's explosive report. Watch the full episode:👇

REPORT: A buried study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children has finally come to light—and the results are shattering the vaccine narrative. Featured in Del Bigtree’s new film An Inconvenient Study ( this long-suppressed data reveals what public health agencies have refused to examine for decades: vaccinated children suffer dramatically higher rates of chronic illness. Led by Dr. Marcus Zervos of Henry Ford Health, the study found vaccinated kids were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma, nearly six times more likely to develop autoimmune disorders, and over five times more likely to suffer neurodevelopmental issues. Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, learning disabilities, or behavioral disorders. When confronted with the findings, Dr. Zervos admitted on hidden camera, “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.” This could be the biggest medical cover-up of our time. See the data for yourself in 's explosive report. Watch the full episode:👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

64,527 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨MAJOR: For YEARS we’ve been clamoring for a true study comparing vaxxed children to unvaxxed children to measure health outcomes. Vaccine proponents DID that study from 2016-2020 and BURIED IT. But, ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network, The HighWire and Del Bigtree in partnership with Senator Ron Johnson now HAVE the results. MUST WATCH.

🚨MAJOR: For YEARS we’ve been clamoring for a true study comparing vaxxed children to unvaxxed children to measure health outcomes. Vaccine proponents DID that study from 2016-2020 and BURIED IT. But, ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network, The HighWire and Del Bigtree in partnership with Senator Ron Johnson now HAVE the results. MUST WATCH.

Tracy Beanz

77,344 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Del Bigtree reveals a shocking correlation between the explosion of the childhood vaccine schedule and a catastrophic rise in chronic illness. In the 1980s, with ~10 vaccines, childhood chronic illness was at 12.4%. After the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act removed liability, the schedule exploded to 72 doses. Now, 54% of American children have a lifelong neurological or autoimmune disorder. The question must be asked: have these vaccines been properly tested for this outcome?

Del Bigtree reveals a shocking correlation between the explosion of the childhood vaccine schedule and a catastrophic rise in chronic illness. In the 1980s, with ~10 vaccines, childhood chronic illness was at 12.4%. After the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act removed liability, the schedule exploded to 72 doses. Now, 54% of American children have a lifelong neurological or autoimmune disorder. The question must be asked: have these vaccines been properly tested for this outcome?

Camus

14,100 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

17% vs. 57%: The Staggering Chronic Illness Difference Between Unvaxxed and Vaxxed Kids A Major Study Found—Before It Was Buried. A bombshell revelation from attorney Aaron Siri exposes a systemic corruption of science that has left parents in the dark for decades. Leading up to 2013, the U.S. government paid the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to review ALL existing science to confirm the safety of the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule. Their finding? “The studies designed to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule… have not been conducted.” They found ZERO studies comparing the long-term health of fully vaccinated vs. completely unvaccinated children. The IOM could only conclude “there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe”—a far cry from proving it is safe. They noted such a study was possible using large medical databases. A 2015 CDC white paper even outlined how to do it. Yet, the government never did. In 2017, the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) sought to answer this critical question. They met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center—a mainstream, pro-vaccine doctor who conducts clinical trials for companies like Moderna. He agreed to conduct the study. Using actual medical records from 2000-2016, his team compared children with no vaccines to those who had one or more. The sample was large: ~2,000 unvaxxed vs. ~16,000 vaxxed. The results were staggering, and all statistically significant. Compared to the unvaccinated, vaccinated children had: ▪️ 4.29x higher rate of ASTHMA ▪️ 3.03x higher rate of ATOPIC DISEASE ▪️ 5.96x higher rate of AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE ▪️ 5.53x higher rate of NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS - Including 3.28x DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY - And 4.47x SPEECH DISORDER For conditions like ADHD, learning disabilities, and intellectual disabilities, there were HUNDREDS of cases in the vaccinated group and ZERO in the unvaccinated. The overarching finding: By age 10, only 17% of the unvaccinated children had a chronic illness. Among the vaccinated, that number skyrocketed to 57%. This was the study that was never done. The one the IOM called for. And its findings were devastating to the official narrative. So what happened? The study was completed in early 2020… and then buried. Aaron Siri states that the researchers, despite affirming the study was well-designed, refused to publish it. Dr. Zervos reportedly said he “didn’t want to lose his job.” The co-author said she “did not want to make doctors uncomfortable.” This is the corruption of science in plain sight. Studies that confirm the desired outcome are published. Those that don’t are shoved in a drawer. We must be able to have honest science to ensure we are protecting children from infectious diseases without causing widespread chronic harm. The public deserves the truth.

17% vs. 57%: The Staggering Chronic Illness Difference Between Unvaxxed and Vaxxed Kids A Major Study Found—Before It Was Buried. A bombshell revelation from attorney Aaron Siri exposes a systemic corruption of science that has left parents in the dark for decades. Leading up to 2013, the U.S. government paid the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to review ALL existing science to confirm the safety of the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule. Their finding? “The studies designed to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule… have not been conducted.” They found ZERO studies comparing the long-term health of fully vaccinated vs. completely unvaccinated children. The IOM could only conclude “there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe”—a far cry from proving it is safe. They noted such a study was possible using large medical databases. A 2015 CDC white paper even outlined how to do it. Yet, the government never did. In 2017, the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) sought to answer this critical question. They met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center—a mainstream, pro-vaccine doctor who conducts clinical trials for companies like Moderna. He agreed to conduct the study. Using actual medical records from 2000-2016, his team compared children with no vaccines to those who had one or more. The sample was large: ~2,000 unvaxxed vs. ~16,000 vaxxed. The results were staggering, and all statistically significant. Compared to the unvaccinated, vaccinated children had: ▪️ 4.29x higher rate of ASTHMA ▪️ 3.03x higher rate of ATOPIC DISEASE ▪️ 5.96x higher rate of AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE ▪️ 5.53x higher rate of NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS - Including 3.28x DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY - And 4.47x SPEECH DISORDER For conditions like ADHD, learning disabilities, and intellectual disabilities, there were HUNDREDS of cases in the vaccinated group and ZERO in the unvaccinated. The overarching finding: By age 10, only 17% of the unvaccinated children had a chronic illness. Among the vaccinated, that number skyrocketed to 57%. This was the study that was never done. The one the IOM called for. And its findings were devastating to the official narrative. So what happened? The study was completed in early 2020… and then buried. Aaron Siri states that the researchers, despite affirming the study was well-designed, refused to publish it. Dr. Zervos reportedly said he “didn’t want to lose his job.” The co-author said she “did not want to make doctors uncomfortable.” This is the corruption of science in plain sight. Studies that confirm the desired outcome are published. Those that don’t are shoved in a drawer. We must be able to have honest science to ensure we are protecting children from infectious diseases without causing widespread chronic harm. The public deserves the truth.

Camus

1,048,777 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network attorney Aaron Siri reveals the CDC has dismantled the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) — a critical database holding vaccine safety data from over 21 million Americans. The data has reportedly been handed back to HMOs and other sources, making it nearly impossible for HHS to investigate environmental causes of autism — or to conduct a comprehensive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study. “If that wasn’t government actors doing it, it would be absolutely criminal,” says Siri. What do you think they’re trying to hide? Full segment: #VaccineSafety #AutismAwareness #MedicalTransparency #HealthFreedom #ICAN #AaronSiri #RFKJr #MakeAmericaHealthyAgain #VSD #VaccinatedVsUnvaccinated #CDC #ExposeTheTruth

🚨 BREAKING: ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network attorney Aaron Siri reveals the CDC has dismantled the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) — a critical database holding vaccine safety data from over 21 million Americans. The data has reportedly been handed back to HMOs and other sources, making it nearly impossible for HHS to investigate environmental causes of autism — or to conduct a comprehensive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study. “If that wasn’t government actors doing it, it would be absolutely criminal,” says Siri. What do you think they’re trying to hide? Full segment: #VaccineSafety #AutismAwareness #MedicalTransparency #HealthFreedom #ICAN #AaronSiri #RFKJr #MakeAmericaHealthyAgain #VSD #VaccinatedVsUnvaccinated #CDC #ExposeTheTruth

The HighWire

3,173,190 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 Del Bigtree LIVE FROM D.C. 🚨 In less than 20 minutes, Senator Ron Johnson will hold a hearing on An Inconvenient Study. Since 2016, I’ve pushed for a top infectious disease expert at one of the world’s most prestigious medical centers to conduct the first true vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study. Instead of proving us wrong, the results became one of the greatest indictments of the vaccine program ever. 📺 Watch the hearing LIVE at ( This is the moment we’ve all been waiting for.

🚨 Del Bigtree LIVE FROM D.C. 🚨 In less than 20 minutes, Senator Ron Johnson will hold a hearing on An Inconvenient Study. Since 2016, I’ve pushed for a top infectious disease expert at one of the world’s most prestigious medical centers to conduct the first true vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study. Instead of proving us wrong, the results became one of the greatest indictments of the vaccine program ever. 📺 Watch the hearing LIVE at ( This is the moment we’ve all been waiting for.

The HighWire

43,880 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

FINALLY: ‘New CDC Work Group to Study Aluminum in Childhood Vaccines.’ The negative and oftentimes life-altering effects of aluminum on a developing brain cannot be understated. It is high time that CDC looked at the risks associated with injecting our children with “over 500 times” the “existing safety limit…in a single practitioner visit.” It is likely that the findings from this work group will reveal that aluminum in vaccines will be as scandalous, if not more, than the mercury/vaccine catastrophe. Brian Hooker, PhD

FINALLY: ‘New CDC Work Group to Study Aluminum in Childhood Vaccines.’ The negative and oftentimes life-altering effects of aluminum on a developing brain cannot be understated. It is high time that CDC looked at the risks associated with injecting our children with “over 500 times” the “existing safety limit…in a single practitioner visit.” It is likely that the findings from this work group will reveal that aluminum in vaccines will be as scandalous, if not more, than the mercury/vaccine catastrophe. Brian Hooker, PhD

Children’s Health Defense

15,217 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

The Unvaccinated Cohort Had Zero ADHD: Legal Expert Aaron Siri Explains Why That's Not a "Fatal Flaw" in Critical Vaccine Study Aaron Siri, a legal expert who frequently litigates around scientific studies, delivered a powerful commentary on the contentious Henry Ford vaccine study. He argues it is one of the best-designed vaccine safety studies ever conducted, precisely because it compares vaccinated against unvaccinated children—a critical methodological standard he claims is often avoided in favor of "vaccinated vs. vaccinated" comparisons, which he likens to "studying the danger of arsenic by comparing it to hemlock." Siri gives immense credit to the scientists behind the study for their fortitude in conducting it, suggesting it was never published because the unexpected results threatened their careers. He directly addresses critiques of the data, specifically the zero ADHD cases in the unvaccinated cohort. He contends this is not a fatal flaw, pointing to 52 cases of asthma in the same group as proof that other environmental factors can cause harm. He further argues that ADHD has a known biological plausibility of being linked to immune dysregulation, a mechanism through which vaccines could potentially be a trigger, a finding supported by smaller existing studies. On the topic of autism, Siri highlights the study's finding of 23 cases in the vaccinated group versus 1 in the unvaccinated. He explains that due to outdated DSM-IV billing codes, many autism cases were historically categorized as ADHD, likely skewing the data. Ultimately, he asserts that while the study is not perfect or wholly determinative, its results are indisputable in one key conclusion: they reveal a "pretty high probability that heavy vaccination might lead to a higher instance of chronic illness" and serve as a powerful call to action for more rigorous and honest safety investigations.

The Unvaccinated Cohort Had Zero ADHD: Legal Expert Aaron Siri Explains Why That's Not a "Fatal Flaw" in Critical Vaccine Study Aaron Siri, a legal expert who frequently litigates around scientific studies, delivered a powerful commentary on the contentious Henry Ford vaccine study. He argues it is one of the best-designed vaccine safety studies ever conducted, precisely because it compares vaccinated against unvaccinated children—a critical methodological standard he claims is often avoided in favor of "vaccinated vs. vaccinated" comparisons, which he likens to "studying the danger of arsenic by comparing it to hemlock." Siri gives immense credit to the scientists behind the study for their fortitude in conducting it, suggesting it was never published because the unexpected results threatened their careers. He directly addresses critiques of the data, specifically the zero ADHD cases in the unvaccinated cohort. He contends this is not a fatal flaw, pointing to 52 cases of asthma in the same group as proof that other environmental factors can cause harm. He further argues that ADHD has a known biological plausibility of being linked to immune dysregulation, a mechanism through which vaccines could potentially be a trigger, a finding supported by smaller existing studies. On the topic of autism, Siri highlights the study's finding of 23 cases in the vaccinated group versus 1 in the unvaccinated. He explains that due to outdated DSM-IV billing codes, many autism cases were historically categorized as ADHD, likely skewing the data. Ultimately, he asserts that while the study is not perfect or wholly determinative, its results are indisputable in one key conclusion: they reveal a "pretty high probability that heavy vaccination might lead to a higher instance of chronic illness" and serve as a powerful call to action for more rigorous and honest safety investigations.

Camus

16,299 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Senator Ron Johnson convened a powerful hearing to confront a crisis of credibility in science, asking a pivotal question: How much of our public health policy is built on unreliable or manipulated data? He opened with a stunning quote from Dr. Marcia Angell, former Editor-in-Chief of the New England Journal of Medicine: “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published.” The evidence presented was alarming: - A Nature survey showing 70% of researchers have failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments. - The closure of 19 Wiley journals due to an avalanche of fraudulent "paper mill" studies, with over 11,300 papers retracted. Senator Johnson then introduced witnesses set to unveil suppressed truths: - Attorney Aaron Siri discussed a concealed 2020 study allegedly showing vaccinated children suffer 2.5x the rate of chronic illness. - Dr. Toby Rogers, PhD detailed the profound flaws and historical obfuscation in autism research. - Minority witness Dr. Jake Scott argued for the public to trust existing vaccine safety studies. Johnson connected this to previous hearings where federal agencies were shown to have hidden myocarditis safety signals linked to mRNA vaccines. He argued that the "vaccine injured" have been systematically ignored by a media eager to report on disease outbreaks but reluctant to cover what they dismiss as "rare and mild" adverse events. The core accusation? That powerful, multi-billion dollar interests actively work to prevent the discovery of root causes for chronic illness. As an expert testified: “They do not want root causes to be discovered.” This hearing wasn't about easy answers, but about forcing a long-overdue acknowledgment of reality. The goal: to restore integrity to science and public faith in the institutions meant to protect our health. The truth may be inconvenient, but it deserves our attention.

Senator Ron Johnson convened a powerful hearing to confront a crisis of credibility in science, asking a pivotal question: How much of our public health policy is built on unreliable or manipulated data? He opened with a stunning quote from Dr. Marcia Angell, former Editor-in-Chief of the New England Journal of Medicine: “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published.” The evidence presented was alarming: - A Nature survey showing 70% of researchers have failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments. - The closure of 19 Wiley journals due to an avalanche of fraudulent "paper mill" studies, with over 11,300 papers retracted. Senator Johnson then introduced witnesses set to unveil suppressed truths: - Attorney Aaron Siri discussed a concealed 2020 study allegedly showing vaccinated children suffer 2.5x the rate of chronic illness. - Dr. Toby Rogers, PhD detailed the profound flaws and historical obfuscation in autism research. - Minority witness Dr. Jake Scott argued for the public to trust existing vaccine safety studies. Johnson connected this to previous hearings where federal agencies were shown to have hidden myocarditis safety signals linked to mRNA vaccines. He argued that the "vaccine injured" have been systematically ignored by a media eager to report on disease outbreaks but reluctant to cover what they dismiss as "rare and mild" adverse events. The core accusation? That powerful, multi-billion dollar interests actively work to prevent the discovery of root causes for chronic illness. As an expert testified: “They do not want root causes to be discovered.” This hearing wasn't about easy answers, but about forcing a long-overdue acknowledgment of reality. The goal: to restore integrity to science and public faith in the institutions meant to protect our health. The truth may be inconvenient, but it deserves our attention.

Camus

26,370 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Ron Johnson on Iran: "By the way, this is exactly what nationwide gun control results in. The Iranian people are completely disarmed. It's gonna be very difficult for them to rise up. So it's a very difficult situation."

Ron Johnson on Iran: "By the way, this is exactly what nationwide gun control results in. The Iranian people are completely disarmed. It's gonna be very difficult for them to rise up. So it's a very difficult situation."

Aaron Rupar

52,191 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

A recent hearing chaired by Senator Ron Johnson brought significant attention to an unpublished study conducted by the Henry Ford Health System, led by Dr. Marcus Zervos, the head of infectious diseases. The study, which compared health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated children, has become a central point of controversy. Following the hearing, Henry Ford Health System pushed back, stating the study draft faced significant peer review concerns and serious data flaws, and that the institution was unaware the rejected draft was being discussed. Critics, including a Washington Post journalist, have echoed these concerns, labeling the research as commissioned by an "anti-vaccine group" and highlighting methodological issues. However, defenders of the study offer counterarguments to the criticism: - They assert the study was not "commissioned" but was a challenge to Dr. Zervos to prove the safety of the vaccine schedule. - They claim no formal peer review was ever conducted on the completed study. - They argue that while the unvaccinated cohort was smaller, its size was statistically significant for comparison. - They contend that sensitivity analyses—which limited data to one year, three years, and five years—consistently showed worse health outcomes in the vaccinated group, with the results becoming more pronounced over time. The core finding of the study indicates vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to develop a chronic disease. Defenders of the research argue that the study's design mirrors the CDC's own recommended blueprint for such comparative safety studies and question why a major health institution would bury concerning results rather than address the alleged flaws and publish. This incident is framed as part of a larger pattern where a comprehensive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study is avoided by public health authorities. A forthcoming documentary, An Inconvenient Study, promises to explore the entire episode in detail.

A recent hearing chaired by Senator Ron Johnson brought significant attention to an unpublished study conducted by the Henry Ford Health System, led by Dr. Marcus Zervos, the head of infectious diseases. The study, which compared health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated children, has become a central point of controversy. Following the hearing, Henry Ford Health System pushed back, stating the study draft faced significant peer review concerns and serious data flaws, and that the institution was unaware the rejected draft was being discussed. Critics, including a Washington Post journalist, have echoed these concerns, labeling the research as commissioned by an "anti-vaccine group" and highlighting methodological issues. However, defenders of the study offer counterarguments to the criticism: - They assert the study was not "commissioned" but was a challenge to Dr. Zervos to prove the safety of the vaccine schedule. - They claim no formal peer review was ever conducted on the completed study. - They argue that while the unvaccinated cohort was smaller, its size was statistically significant for comparison. - They contend that sensitivity analyses—which limited data to one year, three years, and five years—consistently showed worse health outcomes in the vaccinated group, with the results becoming more pronounced over time. The core finding of the study indicates vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to develop a chronic disease. Defenders of the research argue that the study's design mirrors the CDC's own recommended blueprint for such comparative safety studies and question why a major health institution would bury concerning results rather than address the alleged flaws and publish. This incident is framed as part of a larger pattern where a comprehensive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study is avoided by public health authorities. A forthcoming documentary, An Inconvenient Study, promises to explore the entire episode in detail.

Camus

33,372 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Aaron Siri breaks down why Dr. Scott's dismissal of a pivotal vaccine safety study is itself fundamentally flawed. Dr. Scott, labeled the Henry Ford Health System study "fatally flawed" due to "detection bias"—the idea that vaccinated kids seek more medical care and thus have more conditions diagnosed. But as Siri points out, had Dr. Scott actually read the submission, he would have seen the study authors specifically designed multiple sensitivity analyses to rule this exact bias out. Here’s what they found: 1. They Quantified Care-Seeking: Vaccinated children averaged 7 medical visits/year. Unvaccinated children averaged 2. This suggests less illness. However, the 17% of unvaccinated kids with a chronic issue averaged 5 visits/year—proving that when they were sick, they did go to the doctor. 2. They Removed the Healthiest Kids: To be ultra-conservative, the authors re-ran the analysis after removing all children who never sought medical care. This eliminated the healthiest unvaccinated cohort. The result? The statistically significant increase in chronic illness in the vaccinated group remained. 3. They Controlled for Duration: To ensure kids were observed equally long, they analyzed only children in the system from birth for 5+ years. The result? The risk ratio for chronic illness in the vaccinated group actually increased, further affirming the findings. 4. They Used a Control Condition: They looked at cancer rates—a condition not plausibly linked to vaccination. Here, they found no statistically significant difference, proving their method could tell a true signal from noise. Siri concludes: The establishment calls this study "flawed by design" not because of its methodology, but because of its outcome. It was designed by professionals to detect safety issues—and it found them. That is what makes it so threatening. The real fatal flaw isn't in the study's design—it's in the refusal to engage with its rigorous, validating evidence.

Aaron Siri breaks down why Dr. Scott's dismissal of a pivotal vaccine safety study is itself fundamentally flawed. Dr. Scott, labeled the Henry Ford Health System study "fatally flawed" due to "detection bias"—the idea that vaccinated kids seek more medical care and thus have more conditions diagnosed. But as Siri points out, had Dr. Scott actually read the submission, he would have seen the study authors specifically designed multiple sensitivity analyses to rule this exact bias out. Here’s what they found: 1. They Quantified Care-Seeking: Vaccinated children averaged 7 medical visits/year. Unvaccinated children averaged 2. This suggests less illness. However, the 17% of unvaccinated kids with a chronic issue averaged 5 visits/year—proving that when they were sick, they did go to the doctor. 2. They Removed the Healthiest Kids: To be ultra-conservative, the authors re-ran the analysis after removing all children who never sought medical care. This eliminated the healthiest unvaccinated cohort. The result? The statistically significant increase in chronic illness in the vaccinated group remained. 3. They Controlled for Duration: To ensure kids were observed equally long, they analyzed only children in the system from birth for 5+ years. The result? The risk ratio for chronic illness in the vaccinated group actually increased, further affirming the findings. 4. They Used a Control Condition: They looked at cancer rates—a condition not plausibly linked to vaccination. Here, they found no statistically significant difference, proving their method could tell a true signal from noise. Siri concludes: The establishment calls this study "flawed by design" not because of its methodology, but because of its outcome. It was designed by professionals to detect safety issues—and it found them. That is what makes it so threatening. The real fatal flaw isn't in the study's design—it's in the refusal to engage with its rigorous, validating evidence.

Camus

175,643 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🚨💉 “The Study says people that took the shots will be making proteins on their own” “If correct this study has serious implications” New study from Yale University is absolutely terrifying for the Covid Vaccinated. People need to start demanding full transparency & support from their Government & health officials in order to fully understand the impact from these experimental vaccines.

🚨💉 “The Study says people that took the shots will be making proteins on their own” “If correct this study has serious implications” New study from Yale University is absolutely terrifying for the Covid Vaccinated. People need to start demanding full transparency & support from their Government & health officials in order to fully understand the impact from these experimental vaccines.

Concerned Citizen

49,192 просмотров • 1 год назад