正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🚨 BREAKING: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent listened to the oral arguments and believes the Supreme Court WILL uphold President Trump's tariffs - meaning the US will NOT have to pay back trillions "Traditionally, the Supreme Court does not interfere with a president's signature policy." "I don't think this ruling...

EricLDaugh's profile picture

Eric Daugherty

1,156,727 subscribers

163,380 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 JUST IN: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent says he listened to the oral arguments and believes the Supreme Court will UPHOLD President Trump's sweeping tariffs AWESOME! We're on the verge of a huge WIN! 🇺🇸 "It is very unlikely that the Supreme Court will overrule a president's signature economic policy. They did not overrule Obamacare." "I believe that the Supreme Court does not want to create chaos. We have set these trade deals. And it is very good for the United States." "We are balancing our trade deficit. You look, Europe is being overrun with Chinese goods. There is now an emergency in Europe." "There's going to be an economic emergency. The Europeans will follow us. So President Trump is preempting this." "If we go back to emergencies, he put a fentanyl tariff in Mexico, Canada, China. Guess what's happened to fentanyl deaths? If that's an emergency, I don't know what it was!" "October 8th, when the Chinese threatened to put rare earth export controls in the entire world, President Trump threatened a 100% tariff. And the Chinese came to the table, and we negotiated on behalf of the whole world!" 💯💯💯
1:25

🚨 JUST IN: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent says he listened to the oral arguments and believes the Supreme Court will UPHOLD President Trump's sweeping tariffs AWESOME! We're on the verge of a huge WIN! 🇺🇸 "It is very unlikely that the Supreme Court will overrule a president's signature economic policy. They did not overrule Obamacare." "I believe that the Supreme Court does not want to create chaos. We have set these trade deals. And it is very good for the United States." "We are balancing our trade deficit. You look, Europe is being overrun with Chinese goods. There is now an emergency in Europe." "There's going to be an economic emergency. The Europeans will follow us. So President Trump is preempting this." "If we go back to emergencies, he put a fentanyl tariff in Mexico, Canada, China. Guess what's happened to fentanyl deaths? If that's an emergency, I don't know what it was!" "October 8th, when the Chinese threatened to put rare earth export controls in the entire world, President Trump threatened a 100% tariff. And the Chinese came to the table, and we negotiated on behalf of the whole world!" 💯💯💯

Eric Daugherty

29,758 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨 JUST IN: Commerce Sec. Howard Lutnick reveals he listened to the ENTIRE Supreme Court case and believes SCOTUS will uphold President Trump's tariffs "We're gonna win the case...I listened to the whole case. I think we win 5-4 or 6-3. The president is absolutely right. He's allowed to regulate importation...he can do it with a fee and a tariff." "However, we have other tools as well...if the SCOTUS does not side with us, which I think they will, we have other tools to put them right in place." "Tariffs are here to stay. Deals are here to stay!" DO THE RIGHT THING, SCOTUS!
1:13

🚨 JUST IN: Commerce Sec. Howard Lutnick reveals he listened to the ENTIRE Supreme Court case and believes SCOTUS will uphold President Trump's tariffs "We're gonna win the case...I listened to the whole case. I think we win 5-4 or 6-3. The president is absolutely right. He's allowed to regulate importation...he can do it with a fee and a tariff." "However, we have other tools as well...if the SCOTUS does not side with us, which I think they will, we have other tools to put them right in place." "Tariffs are here to stay. Deals are here to stay!" DO THE RIGHT THING, SCOTUS!

Eric Daugherty

202,732 次观看 • 10 个月前

Scott Bessent believes SCOTUS will deliver a favorable ruling for President Trump’s use of Tariffs. 💥 “I think it’s very unlikely that the Supreme Court is going to strike down a president’s signature economic policy..”
2:19

Scott Bessent believes SCOTUS will deliver a favorable ruling for President Trump’s use of Tariffs. 💥 “I think it’s very unlikely that the Supreme Court is going to strike down a president’s signature economic policy..”

MJTruthUltra

15,450 次观看 • 8 个月前

.Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: Tariffs are "a matter of national security and this is one of President Donald J. Trump' signature policies — and it would be very unusual for the Supreme Court to overrule a President's signature policy. The Supreme Court gave President Obama a lot of room on Obamacare..."
1:37

.Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: Tariffs are "a matter of national security and this is one of President Donald J. Trump' signature policies — and it would be very unusual for the Supreme Court to overrule a President's signature policy. The Supreme Court gave President Obama a lot of room on Obamacare..."

Rapid Response 47

121,213 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: Treasury Sec. SCOTT BESSENT will be sitting in the FRONT ROW at the Supreme Court as they consider abolishing President Trump's sweeping tariffs "I am there to emphasize that this is an economic EMERGENCY. National security is economic security. Economic security is national security. As the Treasury secretary of the United States, I'm in charge of maintaining both." This is a LANDMARK case and central to Trump's foreign policy wins. "I'm actually going to go and sit hopefully in the front row and have a ringside seat!" "This is a matter of national security. If President Trump had not had the IEEPA, which is an emergency tariff authority, back in the spring, he put IEEPA tariffs on China. Last week in Korea, the Chinese agreed to start working to bring down the precursors for fentanyl. If fentanyl is not a national emergency, what is?!" 🔥🔥🔥 SCOTUS MUST do the right thing!
1:52

🚨 BREAKING: Treasury Sec. SCOTT BESSENT will be sitting in the FRONT ROW at the Supreme Court as they consider abolishing President Trump's sweeping tariffs "I am there to emphasize that this is an economic EMERGENCY. National security is economic security. Economic security is national security. As the Treasury secretary of the United States, I'm in charge of maintaining both." This is a LANDMARK case and central to Trump's foreign policy wins. "I'm actually going to go and sit hopefully in the front row and have a ringside seat!" "This is a matter of national security. If President Trump had not had the IEEPA, which is an emergency tariff authority, back in the spring, he put IEEPA tariffs on China. Last week in Korea, the Chinese agreed to start working to bring down the precursors for fentanyl. If fentanyl is not a national emergency, what is?!" 🔥🔥🔥 SCOTUS MUST do the right thing!

Eric Daugherty

146,712 次观看 • 11 个月前

CNN’s Dana Bash got embarrassed live on her own show as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flat out rejected her entire framing on tariffs. She tried to turn it into a $134 billion reckoning, but Bessent came armed with the facts. She was left scrambling. BASH: “I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” BESSENT: “Well Dana that’s not the big question.” BESSENT: “Let’s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president’s authority under the IEEPA tariffs. BESSENT: “We have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariffs, section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it’s a big question, that’s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn’t even address that.” BESSENT: “The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.” BESSENT: “And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the supreme court did not address refunds.” BASH: “Sure. They didn’t address refunds. That is clearly going to be up to to you, which—” BESSENT: “No, no, no Dana, it is not up to me.” BASH: “Not…not…you…” BESSENT: “It is not up to the administration. It is up to the lower court. Let’s just be clear on that.” The “big question” wasn’t so big after all.
1:28

CNN’s Dana Bash got embarrassed live on her own show as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flat out rejected her entire framing on tariffs. She tried to turn it into a $134 billion reckoning, but Bessent came armed with the facts. She was left scrambling. BASH: “I do want to start with the big question. Will you refund the roughly $134 billion in revenue taken by these emergency tariffs?” BESSENT: “Well Dana that’s not the big question.” BESSENT: “Let’s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president’s authority under the IEEPA tariffs. BESSENT: “We have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariffs, section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it’s a big question, that’s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn’t even address that.” BESSENT: “The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court.” BESSENT: “And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the supreme court did not address refunds.” BASH: “Sure. They didn’t address refunds. That is clearly going to be up to to you, which—” BESSENT: “No, no, no Dana, it is not up to me.” BASH: “Not…not…you…” BESSENT: “It is not up to the administration. It is up to the lower court. Let’s just be clear on that.” The “big question” wasn’t so big after all.

Overton

245,862 次观看 • 7 个月前

MASSIVE BREAKING: The United States Supreme Court has just struck down Trump's ILLEGAL tariffs. We've been telling you for a year now that Trump does not have the authority to implement these tariffs without Congress. We were right. The Supreme Court, 3 justices which are appointed by Trump, just ruled that he broke the law!
0:30

MASSIVE BREAKING: The United States Supreme Court has just struck down Trump's ILLEGAL tariffs. We've been telling you for a year now that Trump does not have the authority to implement these tariffs without Congress. We were right. The Supreme Court, 3 justices which are appointed by Trump, just ruled that he broke the law!

Brian Krassenstein

422,885 次观看 • 7 个月前

“This is really a national security issue,” says Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on tariffs. “If the Supreme Court goes the other way, it will be a loss for the American people… look at the drop in fentanyl deaths because President Donald J. Trump was able to put fentanyl tariffs on China, Mexico, Canada.”
1:09

“This is really a national security issue,” says Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on tariffs. “If the Supreme Court goes the other way, it will be a loss for the American people… look at the drop in fentanyl deaths because President Donald J. Trump was able to put fentanyl tariffs on China, Mexico, Canada.”

Rapid Response 47

135,684 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨HOLY CRAP: SCOTUS Decision Could WIPE OUT Billions in US Gains, NULLIFY Trump's Deals, Force US To Pay Back TRILLIONS in Tariffs – Economy SHATTERED, Chaos Ensues! 😤 Folks, the lower appeals court ruling on Trump's Tariffs – it's a FULL-BLOWN THREAT to America's sovereignty and economy! If the SCOTUS lacks the spine to overturn that bogus lower court ruling (7-4 against Trump's tariffs), we're staring down CATASTROPHIC damage. HERE IS WHY THIS IS HUGE: 🔴Billions in Tariff Revenue GONE: We'd have to REFUND every penny collected from countries like China. That's OUR money vanishing into thin air – irreparable hit to the Treasury! 🔴Trade Deals in LIMBO: All those hard-fought deals Trump negotiated? Poof! Null and void. Uncertainty will CRIPPLE negotiations and leave us WEAK on the global stage. 🔴Investments EVAPORATE: Companies poured BILLIONS into the US because of these tariffs – think factories, jobs, growth! If ruled illegal, those deals collapse overnight. Markets will ROIL, businesses flee, and we're left holding the bag. ‼️This Would Be ECONOMIC SABOTAGE! Businesses big and small are already freaking out. Gas prices might be down now, but wait till this mess hits. Midterms? This could swing EVERYTHING. Supreme Court: DO THE RIGHT THING. Uphold the President's constitutional power to protect America with tariffs. Our future depends on it! 🚨
1:43

🚨HOLY CRAP: SCOTUS Decision Could WIPE OUT Billions in US Gains, NULLIFY Trump's Deals, Force US To Pay Back TRILLIONS in Tariffs – Economy SHATTERED, Chaos Ensues! 😤 Folks, the lower appeals court ruling on Trump's Tariffs – it's a FULL-BLOWN THREAT to America's sovereignty and economy! If the SCOTUS lacks the spine to overturn that bogus lower court ruling (7-4 against Trump's tariffs), we're staring down CATASTROPHIC damage. HERE IS WHY THIS IS HUGE: 🔴Billions in Tariff Revenue GONE: We'd have to REFUND every penny collected from countries like China. That's OUR money vanishing into thin air – irreparable hit to the Treasury! 🔴Trade Deals in LIMBO: All those hard-fought deals Trump negotiated? Poof! Null and void. Uncertainty will CRIPPLE negotiations and leave us WEAK on the global stage. 🔴Investments EVAPORATE: Companies poured BILLIONS into the US because of these tariffs – think factories, jobs, growth! If ruled illegal, those deals collapse overnight. Markets will ROIL, businesses flee, and we're left holding the bag. ‼️This Would Be ECONOMIC SABOTAGE! Businesses big and small are already freaking out. Gas prices might be down now, but wait till this mess hits. Midterms? This could swing EVERYTHING. Supreme Court: DO THE RIGHT THING. Uphold the President's constitutional power to protect America with tariffs. Our future depends on it! 🚨

Project Constitution

453,576 次观看 • 1 年前

BESSENT: “What the Supreme Court said is that the President cannot use IEEPA to do this, he does have other authorities. It's very interesting that the Supreme Court said that the President can't raise $1 of revenue with tariffs, but he can put on a full embargo." looks like the admin will fight very hard to keep tariffs using any justification they can legally provide
1:10

BESSENT: “What the Supreme Court said is that the President cannot use IEEPA to do this, he does have other authorities. It's very interesting that the Supreme Court said that the President can't raise $1 of revenue with tariffs, but he can put on a full embargo." looks like the admin will fight very hard to keep tariffs using any justification they can legally provide

amit

111,812 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump BLOWS UP on the Supreme Court after they forced him to REFUND $166 BILLION in tariffs "The Supreme Court didn't want to SAVE our country with one sentence, $165 billion! And we're giving a lot of that money back to people that HATE OUR COUNTRY. So I'm NOT happy with the Supreme Court!" "We're being SUCKED DRY!" "We had a SETBACK with the Supreme Court...because of what they did, we have to pay $165 BILLION DOLLARS!" "All they had to do is add one sentence: you don't have to pay what you've taken in thus far back." "We lost by just 2 votes! Little 2 votes. We have to pay back $165 BILLION! With one sentence, you don't have to pay back tariffs. Start from this point." "It's a little more unwieldy, but it's the way it's been done."
1:18

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump BLOWS UP on the Supreme Court after they forced him to REFUND $166 BILLION in tariffs "The Supreme Court didn't want to SAVE our country with one sentence, $165 billion! And we're giving a lot of that money back to people that HATE OUR COUNTRY. So I'm NOT happy with the Supreme Court!" "We're being SUCKED DRY!" "We had a SETBACK with the Supreme Court...because of what they did, we have to pay $165 BILLION DOLLARS!" "All they had to do is add one sentence: you don't have to pay what you've taken in thus far back." "We lost by just 2 votes! Little 2 votes. We have to pay back $165 BILLION! With one sentence, you don't have to pay back tariffs. Start from this point." "It's a little more unwieldy, but it's the way it's been done."

Eric Daugherty

457,125 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨JUST NOW: Sen. Rand Paul says the Constitution doesn't have meaning since President Trump is using Tariffs. Q: "I know you're not a fan of tariffs. Do you want to see them struck down by the Supreme Court?" PAUL: "Tariffs are a tax, and anybody who tries to say tariffs are not a tax is just not serious. A president cannot levy taxes without the approval of Congress. I think the Supreme Court's going to strike this down."
0:48

🚨JUST NOW: Sen. Rand Paul says the Constitution doesn't have meaning since President Trump is using Tariffs. Q: "I know you're not a fan of tariffs. Do you want to see them struck down by the Supreme Court?" PAUL: "Tariffs are a tax, and anybody who tries to say tariffs are not a tax is just not serious. A president cannot levy taxes without the approval of Congress. I think the Supreme Court's going to strike this down."

The Patriot Oasis™

949,753 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: President Trump says that he will GO to the Supreme Court to WATCH their ruling on his Tariff Power. "That is why I'm going down to the Supreme Court to WATCH." "I have not done that, but I think it is ONE of the MOST IMPORTANT Cases EVER Brought!"
0:24

🚨MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: President Trump says that he will GO to the Supreme Court to WATCH their ruling on his Tariff Power. "That is why I'm going down to the Supreme Court to WATCH." "I have not done that, but I think it is ONE of the MOST IMPORTANT Cases EVER Brought!"

The Patriot Oasis™

1,069,678 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨 NOW: President Trump DROPS this line on the U.S. Supreme Court “Any money paid to the United States of America does not have to be paid back” — That sentence, if added by the Supreme Court to its highly disputed Tariff decision, would have saved America 159 Billion Dollars!“ Now we have to give out refunds. BOTCHED RULING!
1:01

🚨 NOW: President Trump DROPS this line on the U.S. Supreme Court “Any money paid to the United States of America does not have to be paid back” — That sentence, if added by the Supreme Court to its highly disputed Tariff decision, would have saved America 159 Billion Dollars!“ Now we have to give out refunds. BOTCHED RULING!

Eric Daugherty

1,183,099 次观看 • 4 个月前