Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨HOLY CRAP: SCOTUS Decision Could WIPE OUT Billions in US Gains, NULLIFY Trump's Deals, Force US To Pay Back TRILLIONS in Tariffs – Economy SHATTERED, Chaos Ensues! 😤 Folks, the lower appeals court ruling on Trump's Tariffs – it's a FULL-BLOWN THREAT to America's sovereignty and economy! If the...

ProjectConstitu's profile picture

Project Constitution

294,026 subscribers

453,576 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikFinanzen
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 BREAKING: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent listened to the oral arguments and believes the Supreme Court WILL uphold President Trump's tariffs - meaning the US will NOT have to pay back trillions "Traditionally, the Supreme Court does not interfere with a president's signature policy." "I don't think this ruling is gonna go against us. If it does - what's THEIR plan for refunds?! Are we just handing these importers big windfalls? What if exporters gave big discounts already? Then you give a refund? They'd be making on both sides." "I don't think the Supreme Court wants to wade into a mess like that." "Numerous peace deals - he threatened tariffs! That got us to the peace deal." "Fentanyl - we had FENTANYL tariffs., What's more of an emergency than hundreds of thousands of Americans dying every year?! Nobody got China to the table [except Trump]." DO THE RIGHT THING, SCOTUS!
1:31

🚨 BREAKING: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent listened to the oral arguments and believes the Supreme Court WILL uphold President Trump's tariffs - meaning the US will NOT have to pay back trillions "Traditionally, the Supreme Court does not interfere with a president's signature policy." "I don't think this ruling is gonna go against us. If it does - what's THEIR plan for refunds?! Are we just handing these importers big windfalls? What if exporters gave big discounts already? Then you give a refund? They'd be making on both sides." "I don't think the Supreme Court wants to wade into a mess like that." "Numerous peace deals - he threatened tariffs! That got us to the peace deal." "Fentanyl - we had FENTANYL tariffs., What's more of an emergency than hundreds of thousands of Americans dying every year?! Nobody got China to the table [except Trump]." DO THE RIGHT THING, SCOTUS!

Eric Daugherty

163,380 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨 JUST IN: Commerce Sec. Howard Lutnick reveals he listened to the ENTIRE Supreme Court case and believes SCOTUS will uphold President Trump's tariffs "We're gonna win the case...I listened to the whole case. I think we win 5-4 or 6-3. The president is absolutely right. He's allowed to regulate importation...he can do it with a fee and a tariff." "However, we have other tools as well...if the SCOTUS does not side with us, which I think they will, we have other tools to put them right in place." "Tariffs are here to stay. Deals are here to stay!" DO THE RIGHT THING, SCOTUS!
1:13

🚨 JUST IN: Commerce Sec. Howard Lutnick reveals he listened to the ENTIRE Supreme Court case and believes SCOTUS will uphold President Trump's tariffs "We're gonna win the case...I listened to the whole case. I think we win 5-4 or 6-3. The president is absolutely right. He's allowed to regulate importation...he can do it with a fee and a tariff." "However, we have other tools as well...if the SCOTUS does not side with us, which I think they will, we have other tools to put them right in place." "Tariffs are here to stay. Deals are here to stay!" DO THE RIGHT THING, SCOTUS!

Eric Daugherty

202,732 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

BREAKING: Trump's illegal tariffs are about to cause a huge mess in the US Economy. Why? "A coalition of 800 small businesses across the country who weren't happy about the tariffs saying they were the ones paying the brunt of these costs. They just put out a statement saying they are sending immediate letters to the white house and congress demanding full, fast and automatic tariff refunds. We talk about how the refunds work for the tariffs, how messy you envision this getting?" Businesses will now request refunds, and there will likely be huge class action lawsuits against the US government. Additionally, the budget is about to have major issues.
0:27

BREAKING: Trump's illegal tariffs are about to cause a huge mess in the US Economy. Why? "A coalition of 800 small businesses across the country who weren't happy about the tariffs saying they were the ones paying the brunt of these costs. They just put out a statement saying they are sending immediate letters to the white house and congress demanding full, fast and automatic tariff refunds. We talk about how the refunds work for the tariffs, how messy you envision this getting?" Businesses will now request refunds, and there will likely be huge class action lawsuits against the US government. Additionally, the budget is about to have major issues.

Ed Krassenstein

854,138 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 JUST IN: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent says he listened to the oral arguments and believes the Supreme Court will UPHOLD President Trump's sweeping tariffs AWESOME! We're on the verge of a huge WIN! 🇺🇸 "It is very unlikely that the Supreme Court will overrule a president's signature economic policy. They did not overrule Obamacare." "I believe that the Supreme Court does not want to create chaos. We have set these trade deals. And it is very good for the United States." "We are balancing our trade deficit. You look, Europe is being overrun with Chinese goods. There is now an emergency in Europe." "There's going to be an economic emergency. The Europeans will follow us. So President Trump is preempting this." "If we go back to emergencies, he put a fentanyl tariff in Mexico, Canada, China. Guess what's happened to fentanyl deaths? If that's an emergency, I don't know what it was!" "October 8th, when the Chinese threatened to put rare earth export controls in the entire world, President Trump threatened a 100% tariff. And the Chinese came to the table, and we negotiated on behalf of the whole world!" 💯💯💯
1:25

🚨 JUST IN: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent says he listened to the oral arguments and believes the Supreme Court will UPHOLD President Trump's sweeping tariffs AWESOME! We're on the verge of a huge WIN! 🇺🇸 "It is very unlikely that the Supreme Court will overrule a president's signature economic policy. They did not overrule Obamacare." "I believe that the Supreme Court does not want to create chaos. We have set these trade deals. And it is very good for the United States." "We are balancing our trade deficit. You look, Europe is being overrun with Chinese goods. There is now an emergency in Europe." "There's going to be an economic emergency. The Europeans will follow us. So President Trump is preempting this." "If we go back to emergencies, he put a fentanyl tariff in Mexico, Canada, China. Guess what's happened to fentanyl deaths? If that's an emergency, I don't know what it was!" "October 8th, when the Chinese threatened to put rare earth export controls in the entire world, President Trump threatened a 100% tariff. And the Chinese came to the table, and we negotiated on behalf of the whole world!" 💯💯💯

Eric Daugherty

29,758 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

I JUST BROKE DOWN THE REAL NUMBERS ON TRUMP'S TARIFFS Everyone expected tariffs to reduce the current account deficit and restore US jobs. But the numbers tell a different story. China just posted a $1.2 trillion trade surplus in 2025. The biggest in history. Up 20% from 2024. And this happened DURING Trump's "maximum pressure" tariff campaign. Let's dive deeper: Early 2025: Tariffs on China escalated as high as 145%. Late 2025: A deal brought them down to the high-40s/low-50s range. January 2026: Trump threatens 25% tariffs on ANY country doing business with Iran. Iran's biggest trading partner? China. But here's the part nobody's talking about: The Tax Policy Center estimates the average tariff rate on ALL US imports is now 17%. The Budget Lab at Yale estimates these tariffs raised consumer prices by 1.2% - roughly $1,700 per household. In 2025, businesses absorbed most of these costs. But in 2026, they're passing them to consumers. The jobs data is worse: After the April 2025 tariff announcement, factory employment FELL by 68,000 jobs. The Federal Reserve found that tariff exposure in 2018-2019 reduced manufacturing employment by 1.4%. A small +0.3% protection effect was offset by -1.1% from higher input costs and -0.7% from retaliation. Even in optimistic scenarios, tariffs create very few jobs once you account for higher input costs destroying downstream employment and retaliation from trading partners. Trump's theory was that tariffs would force manufacturing back to the US. The reality: Companies just moved production to Vietnam, Mexico, and Malaysia. Supply chains didn't come home. They found cheaper routes around the tariffs. And China? Exports to the US fell 20%, but grew everywhere else. Africa: +26% Southeast Asia: +13% EU: +8% China maintained 14% of global exports. 4x more than India and Vietnam combined. Trump didn't destroy China's export machine. He redirected where it sells. Here's the fiscal reality: Trump claims tariffs will eliminate the deficit and eventually replace income taxes. Even in an optimistic scenario, tariffs will raise about $400 billion. The budget deficit last year? Over $2 trillion. Income tax revenue? Over $2 trillion. The math doesn't work. It's not even close. Now the legal problem: The Supreme Court is weighing whether Trump's tariffs were even legal under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Congressional researchers say importers paid roughly $129 billion in estimated duty deposits for IEEPA tariffs as of December 10, 2025. If the Court rules against Trump, that money potentially gets refunded. The entire tariff structure collapses. And nobody knows what happens next. Costco and major retailers have already filed lawsuits. Meanwhile, the EU is negotiating with China on "minimum price undertakings" to replace tariffs. Canada is considering dropping their 100% tariff on Chinese EVs. So Trump's pressure is pushing allies CLOSER to China, not away. These tariff policies are accelerating the transition to a tripolar world - US, China, and a European bloc increasingly willing to play both sides. Here's the ONE thing you have to understand: Markets can price risk. They cannot price uncertainty. Right now markets are complacent. The VIX is subdued. Credit spreads are tight. But if the Supreme Court rules against the tariffs, uncertainty escalates dramatically. No one knows what happens to the $195 billion already collected. No one knows if companies get refunds. No one knows what Trump's next move is if he loses this authority. Markets do not handle institutional uncertainty well. So are Trump's tariffs working? If working means reducing the deficit and creating US jobs, the answer is no. Tariffs can help a narrow slice of producers and raise revenue. But evidence shows they raise consumer prices and, on net, reduce manufacturing employment once you include input costs and retaliation. The next weeks will be crucial.
1:18

I JUST BROKE DOWN THE REAL NUMBERS ON TRUMP'S TARIFFS Everyone expected tariffs to reduce the current account deficit and restore US jobs. But the numbers tell a different story. China just posted a $1.2 trillion trade surplus in 2025. The biggest in history. Up 20% from 2024. And this happened DURING Trump's "maximum pressure" tariff campaign. Let's dive deeper: Early 2025: Tariffs on China escalated as high as 145%. Late 2025: A deal brought them down to the high-40s/low-50s range. January 2026: Trump threatens 25% tariffs on ANY country doing business with Iran. Iran's biggest trading partner? China. But here's the part nobody's talking about: The Tax Policy Center estimates the average tariff rate on ALL US imports is now 17%. The Budget Lab at Yale estimates these tariffs raised consumer prices by 1.2% - roughly $1,700 per household. In 2025, businesses absorbed most of these costs. But in 2026, they're passing them to consumers. The jobs data is worse: After the April 2025 tariff announcement, factory employment FELL by 68,000 jobs. The Federal Reserve found that tariff exposure in 2018-2019 reduced manufacturing employment by 1.4%. A small +0.3% protection effect was offset by -1.1% from higher input costs and -0.7% from retaliation. Even in optimistic scenarios, tariffs create very few jobs once you account for higher input costs destroying downstream employment and retaliation from trading partners. Trump's theory was that tariffs would force manufacturing back to the US. The reality: Companies just moved production to Vietnam, Mexico, and Malaysia. Supply chains didn't come home. They found cheaper routes around the tariffs. And China? Exports to the US fell 20%, but grew everywhere else. Africa: +26% Southeast Asia: +13% EU: +8% China maintained 14% of global exports. 4x more than India and Vietnam combined. Trump didn't destroy China's export machine. He redirected where it sells. Here's the fiscal reality: Trump claims tariffs will eliminate the deficit and eventually replace income taxes. Even in an optimistic scenario, tariffs will raise about $400 billion. The budget deficit last year? Over $2 trillion. Income tax revenue? Over $2 trillion. The math doesn't work. It's not even close. Now the legal problem: The Supreme Court is weighing whether Trump's tariffs were even legal under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Congressional researchers say importers paid roughly $129 billion in estimated duty deposits for IEEPA tariffs as of December 10, 2025. If the Court rules against Trump, that money potentially gets refunded. The entire tariff structure collapses. And nobody knows what happens next. Costco and major retailers have already filed lawsuits. Meanwhile, the EU is negotiating with China on "minimum price undertakings" to replace tariffs. Canada is considering dropping their 100% tariff on Chinese EVs. So Trump's pressure is pushing allies CLOSER to China, not away. These tariff policies are accelerating the transition to a tripolar world - US, China, and a European bloc increasingly willing to play both sides. Here's the ONE thing you have to understand: Markets can price risk. They cannot price uncertainty. Right now markets are complacent. The VIX is subdued. Credit spreads are tight. But if the Supreme Court rules against the tariffs, uncertainty escalates dramatically. No one knows what happens to the $195 billion already collected. No one knows if companies get refunds. No one knows what Trump's next move is if he loses this authority. Markets do not handle institutional uncertainty well. So are Trump's tariffs working? If working means reducing the deficit and creating US jobs, the answer is no. Tariffs can help a narrow slice of producers and raise revenue. But evidence shows they raise consumer prices and, on net, reduce manufacturing employment once you include input costs and retaliation. The next weeks will be crucial.

George Noble

90,704 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

NEW: JD Vance explains how Trump's tariffs will reinvigorate American manufacturing and generate jobs for American workers. "The president's been very clear. He wants to impose tariffs on foreign importers because he wants to bring investment and jobs back to the United States Of America." "Build more in the USA, invest more in the USA, raise wages for workers in the USA, and you don't have to pay these tariffs at all." "We also have to force businesses to invest more, not overseas, not in Chinese workers, but in American workers." "What the President is doing is changing forty years of a failed bipartisan consensus in Washington DC that has sold out American workers and destroyed the underlying economic strength of the USA." "The basic thrust of President Trump's economic policies are, if you invest in the USA, you are going to be rewarded with lower taxes, lower regulations, and lower energy costs." "If you want to build a factory in China, that's your right, but you're going to pay when you try to bring that stuff back to the United States."
5:48

NEW: JD Vance explains how Trump's tariffs will reinvigorate American manufacturing and generate jobs for American workers. "The president's been very clear. He wants to impose tariffs on foreign importers because he wants to bring investment and jobs back to the United States Of America." "Build more in the USA, invest more in the USA, raise wages for workers in the USA, and you don't have to pay these tariffs at all." "We also have to force businesses to invest more, not overseas, not in Chinese workers, but in American workers." "What the President is doing is changing forty years of a failed bipartisan consensus in Washington DC that has sold out American workers and destroyed the underlying economic strength of the USA." "The basic thrust of President Trump's economic policies are, if you invest in the USA, you are going to be rewarded with lower taxes, lower regulations, and lower energy costs." "If you want to build a factory in China, that's your right, but you're going to pay when you try to bring that stuff back to the United States."

KanekoaTheGreat

3,226,163 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

#WATCH | Washington, DC | On being asked by ANI if tariffs would be imposed on China for buying crude oil from Russia, US President Trump says. "... Right now, as of November 1st, China will have about 155% tariffs put on it. I don't think it's sustainable for them. I want to be nice to China. But China has been very rough with us over the years because we had presidents that weren't smart from a business standpoint... They allowed China and every other country to take advantage of us. I made a deal with the European Union. I made a deal with Japan and South Korea. A lot of these deals are great deals... It's about national security. I was able to do it because of tariffs. We're getting hundreds of billions, even trillions of dollars paid into the United States... We'll start paying off debt..." (Source: The White House)
2:20

#WATCH | Washington, DC | On being asked by ANI if tariffs would be imposed on China for buying crude oil from Russia, US President Trump says. "... Right now, as of November 1st, China will have about 155% tariffs put on it. I don't think it's sustainable for them. I want to be nice to China. But China has been very rough with us over the years because we had presidents that weren't smart from a business standpoint... They allowed China and every other country to take advantage of us. I made a deal with the European Union. I made a deal with Japan and South Korea. A lot of these deals are great deals... It's about national security. I was able to do it because of tariffs. We're getting hundreds of billions, even trillions of dollars paid into the United States... We'll start paying off debt..." (Source: The White House)

ANI

48,752 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Businesses in America have moved quickly and are now demanding refunds for the tariffs they paid after the pronouncement by the United States Supreme Court that Donald Trump’s tariffs were illegal. So this is how the tariffs worked. If you imported goods from South Africa and there was an illegal 30 percent tariff on them, the company importing the goods from South Africa would have had to pay that 30 percent tariff to the American government and then pass that cost on to the consumer. For instance, if an American company ordered a bottle of wine from South Africa and there was a 30 percent tariff on it, which the Supreme Court has now pronounced illegal, and that bottle cost US$1 to import, once it reached America the importer would have to add the 30 percent tariff, taking the cost to US$1.30. The importing company would then add its own margin, say another US$0.30 as profit. Ordinarily, without the tariff, that bottle might have retailed at around US$1.30, but because of the additional 30 percent tariff, it would end up costing the consumer about US$1.60. In effect, the 30 percent tariff was passed directly on to the consumer through higher retail prices. What American businesses are now saying is that they want that 30 percent tariff refunded. So the company that imported the bottle of wine from South Africa and sold it for US$1.60, comprising 30 percent tariff and 30 percent profit, now wants the tariff component returned to them. How consumers themselves will be reimbursed, if at all, remains unclear, and that is likely to become the next area of legal and commercial contestation. Meanwhile, American media is reporting that Donald Trump has gone into meltdown after the Supreme Court delivered this important ruling, which many had already predicted because it was clear to numerous legal experts that the tariffs were unlawful. Only his most loyal supporters insisted that the court would uphold them. The decision has triggered not only political shockwaves in Washington but also significant financial and legal consequences, as businesses begin positioning themselves to recover the money improperly collected by Trump’s government.
1:33

Businesses in America have moved quickly and are now demanding refunds for the tariffs they paid after the pronouncement by the United States Supreme Court that Donald Trump’s tariffs were illegal. So this is how the tariffs worked. If you imported goods from South Africa and there was an illegal 30 percent tariff on them, the company importing the goods from South Africa would have had to pay that 30 percent tariff to the American government and then pass that cost on to the consumer. For instance, if an American company ordered a bottle of wine from South Africa and there was a 30 percent tariff on it, which the Supreme Court has now pronounced illegal, and that bottle cost US$1 to import, once it reached America the importer would have to add the 30 percent tariff, taking the cost to US$1.30. The importing company would then add its own margin, say another US$0.30 as profit. Ordinarily, without the tariff, that bottle might have retailed at around US$1.30, but because of the additional 30 percent tariff, it would end up costing the consumer about US$1.60. In effect, the 30 percent tariff was passed directly on to the consumer through higher retail prices. What American businesses are now saying is that they want that 30 percent tariff refunded. So the company that imported the bottle of wine from South Africa and sold it for US$1.60, comprising 30 percent tariff and 30 percent profit, now wants the tariff component returned to them. How consumers themselves will be reimbursed, if at all, remains unclear, and that is likely to become the next area of legal and commercial contestation. Meanwhile, American media is reporting that Donald Trump has gone into meltdown after the Supreme Court delivered this important ruling, which many had already predicted because it was clear to numerous legal experts that the tariffs were unlawful. Only his most loyal supporters insisted that the court would uphold them. The decision has triggered not only political shockwaves in Washington but also significant financial and legal consequences, as businesses begin positioning themselves to recover the money improperly collected by Trump’s government.

Hopewell Chin’ono

42,592 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

SCOTUS SLOW FAIL: Stephen Moore just torched the Supreme Court for dragging their feet on the tariff ruling - 6 months of waiting! "Why did it take the Supreme Court 6 months to make this decision? SHAME ON THE COURT!" Moore called it one of the most important economic decisions in modern times, leaving everyone confused on the economy's direction. "This is one of the most important economic decisions in modern times." "It has left everyone confused on which direction the economy will take after this." While globalists cheer the IEEPA block, Trump's already pivoting with new 10% global tariffs and other tools. The delay was a disgrace - but America First trade keeps charging forward no matter what!
0:50

SCOTUS SLOW FAIL: Stephen Moore just torched the Supreme Court for dragging their feet on the tariff ruling - 6 months of waiting! "Why did it take the Supreme Court 6 months to make this decision? SHAME ON THE COURT!" Moore called it one of the most important economic decisions in modern times, leaving everyone confused on the economy's direction. "This is one of the most important economic decisions in modern times." "It has left everyone confused on which direction the economy will take after this." While globalists cheer the IEEPA block, Trump's already pivoting with new 10% global tariffs and other tools. The delay was a disgrace - but America First trade keeps charging forward no matter what!

Bill Mitchell

42,941 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Bill Ackman Bill Ackman on markets and tariffs. Bill Ackman gives his optimistic take on what he expects over the next 6 -9 months: - Ukraine / Russia war to be resolved. - Some kind of resolution in the Middle East with Iran. - Inflation largely run out of the economy and will stay down. On tariffs: "I think tariffs, if they ultimately get resolved will increase the cost by a percentage of some products - but it's not like inflation that will compound - it's more like a one time reset." "I think what's important is that tariffs get resolved in the relative short-term." What does "resolved" mean on tariffs? "I would say Trump has gotten the world's attention on trade imbalances and unfair trading practices with our partners." "My argument is, made the point with China, but 145% tariff means we're ceasing doing business with China. That has very negative repercussions for China and for U.S. small businesses and others." "The right thing to do, in my view, is we pause on China - let's give it a little more time - maybe it's 180 days because we're going to be busy here. What that does is it stabilizes the risk to the U.S. economy and small businesses around the country. But China is now highly incentivized to make a deal."
5:32

Bill Ackman Bill Ackman on markets and tariffs. Bill Ackman gives his optimistic take on what he expects over the next 6 -9 months: - Ukraine / Russia war to be resolved. - Some kind of resolution in the Middle East with Iran. - Inflation largely run out of the economy and will stay down. On tariffs: "I think tariffs, if they ultimately get resolved will increase the cost by a percentage of some products - but it's not like inflation that will compound - it's more like a one time reset." "I think what's important is that tariffs get resolved in the relative short-term." What does "resolved" mean on tariffs? "I would say Trump has gotten the world's attention on trade imbalances and unfair trading practices with our partners." "My argument is, made the point with China, but 145% tariff means we're ceasing doing business with China. That has very negative repercussions for China and for U.S. small businesses and others." "The right thing to do, in my view, is we pause on China - let's give it a little more time - maybe it's 180 days because we're going to be busy here. What that does is it stabilizes the risk to the U.S. economy and small businesses around the country. But China is now highly incentivized to make a deal."

Barbie True Blue

330,467 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 DEMOCRATS ARE MELTING DOWN OVER TRUMP ACTUALLY ENFORCING TRADE DEALS Congressman Brendan Boyle just went full panic mode on MSNOW: Trade war with Canada will “push us over the edge” into recession… Tariffs are the worst since the Great Depression… And somehow easing beef tariffs for 90 days to lower grocery prices is also a disaster. Let’s get this straight: Canada has been hammering American farmers with tariffs for years. Trump finally hits back. Suddenly it’s “attacking our allies.” When he temporarily eases beef tariffs to help consumers, Republicans and Democrats both cry that it’s hurting ranchers. There’s no winning with these people. They spent years ignoring Canadian tariffs that hurt our producers. Now that Trump is matching them, it’s an economic apocalypse. And of course Boyle ends with the classic Democrat pivot: If the economy struggles, Trump will just “demonize” illegals to distract people. The real distraction is Democrats pretending free trade only works in one direction.
7:36

🚨 DEMOCRATS ARE MELTING DOWN OVER TRUMP ACTUALLY ENFORCING TRADE DEALS Congressman Brendan Boyle just went full panic mode on MSNOW: Trade war with Canada will “push us over the edge” into recession… Tariffs are the worst since the Great Depression… And somehow easing beef tariffs for 90 days to lower grocery prices is also a disaster. Let’s get this straight: Canada has been hammering American farmers with tariffs for years. Trump finally hits back. Suddenly it’s “attacking our allies.” When he temporarily eases beef tariffs to help consumers, Republicans and Democrats both cry that it’s hurting ranchers. There’s no winning with these people. They spent years ignoring Canadian tariffs that hurt our producers. Now that Trump is matching them, it’s an economic apocalypse. And of course Boyle ends with the classic Democrat pivot: If the economy struggles, Trump will just “demonize” illegals to distract people. The real distraction is Democrats pretending free trade only works in one direction.

Gunther Eagleman™

52,116 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Trump has just proved why he’s known internationally as the global village idiot. If he thought tariffs was the answer to annexing Greenland 🇬🇱 he’s made a massive miscalculation. If he thinks Europe is weak, he’s about to find out how mistaken he is. America is slowly becoming Billy no mates. You should NEVER threaten countries that own so much of your debt when you are on the hook for $38.4 trillion and your tariff revenue represents just 28% of the interest on that debt. Soon the US will reach the point of no return and hand global pole position to China and they haven’t had to lift a finger. If Republicans in Congress sit back and do nothing, they will go down in history as the people that destroyed the US economy. Trump may now find he’s left the Supreme Court to rule against him on tariffs in order to save America from becoming an economic wasteland. 🎥 TikTok -
1:50

Trump has just proved why he’s known internationally as the global village idiot. If he thought tariffs was the answer to annexing Greenland 🇬🇱 he’s made a massive miscalculation. If he thinks Europe is weak, he’s about to find out how mistaken he is. America is slowly becoming Billy no mates. You should NEVER threaten countries that own so much of your debt when you are on the hook for $38.4 trillion and your tariff revenue represents just 28% of the interest on that debt. Soon the US will reach the point of no return and hand global pole position to China and they haven’t had to lift a finger. If Republicans in Congress sit back and do nothing, they will go down in history as the people that destroyed the US economy. Trump may now find he’s left the Supreme Court to rule against him on tariffs in order to save America from becoming an economic wasteland. 🎥 TikTok -

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

286,471 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: Treasury Sec. SCOTT BESSENT will be sitting in the FRONT ROW at the Supreme Court as they consider abolishing President Trump's sweeping tariffs "I am there to emphasize that this is an economic EMERGENCY. National security is economic security. Economic security is national security. As the Treasury secretary of the United States, I'm in charge of maintaining both." This is a LANDMARK case and central to Trump's foreign policy wins. "I'm actually going to go and sit hopefully in the front row and have a ringside seat!" "This is a matter of national security. If President Trump had not had the IEEPA, which is an emergency tariff authority, back in the spring, he put IEEPA tariffs on China. Last week in Korea, the Chinese agreed to start working to bring down the precursors for fentanyl. If fentanyl is not a national emergency, what is?!" 🔥🔥🔥 SCOTUS MUST do the right thing!
1:52

🚨 BREAKING: Treasury Sec. SCOTT BESSENT will be sitting in the FRONT ROW at the Supreme Court as they consider abolishing President Trump's sweeping tariffs "I am there to emphasize that this is an economic EMERGENCY. National security is economic security. Economic security is national security. As the Treasury secretary of the United States, I'm in charge of maintaining both." This is a LANDMARK case and central to Trump's foreign policy wins. "I'm actually going to go and sit hopefully in the front row and have a ringside seat!" "This is a matter of national security. If President Trump had not had the IEEPA, which is an emergency tariff authority, back in the spring, he put IEEPA tariffs on China. Last week in Korea, the Chinese agreed to start working to bring down the precursors for fentanyl. If fentanyl is not a national emergency, what is?!" 🔥🔥🔥 SCOTUS MUST do the right thing!

Eric Daugherty

146,712 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten