Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨🚨BREAKING UPDATES 🚨 🇨🇳 China Debuts First Fully AI-Made Animated Feature China has premiered what it calls the world’s first fully AI-generated animated feature film. No human animators, no traditional pipeline, no army of artists working on frames at 3 a.m. Scripts, storyboards, character design, animation, voice synthesis -... all handled by AI systems in a single production flow. This is not a tech demo. It is a proof of concept aimed at the global entertainment industry. Here is the real implication: animation was supposed to be the safe creative sector - high skill, high labor, culturally protected. China just showed that with enough compute, training data, and state-backed patience, that protection disappears fast. The quality? Debatable. The signal? Undeniable. This lowers production costs, shortens timelines, and breaks the Western studio model built on unions, bottlenecks, and IP gatekeeping. It also gives Beijing something Hollywood once controlled: Scalable cultural output. What happens next is predictable. More AI films. Better ones. Export versions tuned for global platforms. And a quiet arms race where studios pretend this is not happening while changing their balance sheets. This is not about art yet. It is about who controls the factory where culture gets made. Source: kamera_ne, yahoo!show more

Core (SatoshiPlus) #BTC, #ETH & #BNB Believers

891,945 subscribers

13,461 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Jensen Huang just told you who is winning the most important race on Earth. For fifty years, America held an unchallenged monopoly on the future. We built the transistor. We launched the internet. We wrote the source code for the modern world. Then the man who builds the physical backbone of every AI system on the planet read the score out loud. Huang: “50% of the world’s AI researchers are Chinese.” Half the minds building what comes next are not ours. Huang: “70% of last year’s AI patents are published by China.” Seven out of every ten blueprints for the next era are being written in Mandarin. Huang: “Nine out of the ten top science and technology schools in the world are now in China.” The talent pipeline did not slow down. It reversed direction. Huang: “We used to lead most of them; now they lead most of them. This has completely flipped in the last half to a decade.” Fifty years of American intellectual supremacy. Inverted in less than ten. This is not a rivalry between OpenAI and DeepSeek. This is not a stock ticker or a quarterly earnings call. This is the largest transfer of civilizational power in the modern era. And it is happening while the West drafts safety frameworks and fills out compliance paperwork. Huang: “They have a large population of highly qualified students. They work incredibly hard. This is a country with an enormous might.” China does not treat AI like a product category. They treat it as the single variable that decides who writes the rules for the next century. The West keeps asking what AI should be allowed to do. China keeps asking how fast they can build it. That gap is not philosophical. It is existential. This is not a left fight. This is not a right fight. This is a survival fight. And right now, America is not fighting it like one. The nation that controls the talent controls the research. The nation that controls the research controls the models. The nation that controls the models does not ask permission. It sets the terms. History never remembers the civilization with the better safety committee. It remembers the one that refused to stop building.

Jensen Huang just told you who is winning the most important race on Earth. For fifty years, America held an unchallenged monopoly on the future. We built the transistor. We launched the internet. We wrote the source code for the modern world. Then the man who builds the physical backbone of every AI system on the planet read the score out loud. Huang: “50% of the world’s AI researchers are Chinese.” Half the minds building what comes next are not ours. Huang: “70% of last year’s AI patents are published by China.” Seven out of every ten blueprints for the next era are being written in Mandarin. Huang: “Nine out of the ten top science and technology schools in the world are now in China.” The talent pipeline did not slow down. It reversed direction. Huang: “We used to lead most of them; now they lead most of them. This has completely flipped in the last half to a decade.” Fifty years of American intellectual supremacy. Inverted in less than ten. This is not a rivalry between OpenAI and DeepSeek. This is not a stock ticker or a quarterly earnings call. This is the largest transfer of civilizational power in the modern era. And it is happening while the West drafts safety frameworks and fills out compliance paperwork. Huang: “They have a large population of highly qualified students. They work incredibly hard. This is a country with an enormous might.” China does not treat AI like a product category. They treat it as the single variable that decides who writes the rules for the next century. The West keeps asking what AI should be allowed to do. China keeps asking how fast they can build it. That gap is not philosophical. It is existential. This is not a left fight. This is not a right fight. This is a survival fight. And right now, America is not fighting it like one. The nation that controls the talent controls the research. The nation that controls the research controls the models. The nation that controls the models does not ask permission. It sets the terms. History never remembers the civilization with the better safety committee. It remembers the one that refused to stop building.

Dustin

57,402 views • 2 months ago

$The Indian Government just did something that has Silicon Valley terrified. India is not simply buying AI chips. It is deliberately making AI compute cheaper than Amazon, and in some cases free. Under the IndiaAI Mission, the government has launched AIRAWAT, a national AI compute platform, alongside iKosha, India’s national AI data treasury. Together, they give startups, researchers and universities access to high-end AI compute at a fraction of the cost charged by Amazon, Google or Microsoft. For public institutions, researchers and selected early-stage startups, access is heavily subsidised, and in some cases provided entirely free. This is a fundamental shift in how AI infrastructure is being built. On Western cloud platforms, AI compute is priced for multinational corporations with deep pockets. India has chosen a different route. Instead of locking AI behind expensive pay-per-use contracts, it has created shared national infrastructure, where GPUs are pooled and made available at cost. Startups do not need millions in venture capital just to train a model. Researchers are not forced into foreign cloud dependency. Innovation is not restricted to those who can afford Silicon Valley pricing. The rollout of tens of thousands of GPUs, many of them Nvidia, is not about stockpiling hardware. It is about democratising access to compute. India is making it clear that if you are building something useful, locally relevant, or public-facing, you should not be priced out of AI by Big Tech. This is why it matters globally. India is not trying to outspend the United States or China. It is doing something more disruptive: undercutting the cloud monopoly model by making AI infrastructure cheap, shared, and in some cases free. That is also why this development receives so little attention in Western tech media. This is iKosha, AIRAWAT, and a conscious move towards AI sovereignty — affordable, accessible, and designed for public good rather than corporate rent-seeking.$

The Indian Government just did something that has Silicon Valley terrified. India is not simply buying AI chips. It is deliberately making AI compute cheaper than Amazon, and in some cases free. Under the IndiaAI Mission, the government has launched AIRAWAT, a national AI compute platform, alongside iKosha, India’s national AI data treasury. Together, they give startups, researchers and universities access to high-end AI compute at a fraction of the cost charged by Amazon, Google or Microsoft. For public institutions, researchers and selected early-stage startups, access is heavily subsidised, and in some cases provided entirely free. This is a fundamental shift in how AI infrastructure is being built. On Western cloud platforms, AI compute is priced for multinational corporations with deep pockets. India has chosen a different route. Instead of locking AI behind expensive pay-per-use contracts, it has created shared national infrastructure, where GPUs are pooled and made available at cost. Startups do not need millions in venture capital just to train a model. Researchers are not forced into foreign cloud dependency. Innovation is not restricted to those who can afford Silicon Valley pricing. The rollout of tens of thousands of GPUs, many of them Nvidia, is not about stockpiling hardware. It is about democratising access to compute. India is making it clear that if you are building something useful, locally relevant, or public-facing, you should not be priced out of AI by Big Tech. This is why it matters globally. India is not trying to outspend the United States or China. It is doing something more disruptive: undercutting the cloud monopoly model by making AI infrastructure cheap, shared, and in some cases free. That is also why this development receives so little attention in Western tech media. This is iKosha, AIRAWAT, and a conscious move towards AI sovereignty — affordable, accessible, and designed for public good rather than corporate rent-seeking.

JIX5A

67,346 views • 5 months ago

One reason I stay a bit quite about AI these few months. I can’t find my voice to say this right. I’ll try. — What has my AI found just in the millions of never saved TV from the 1980s-1990s? The simple commercial, I have the largest collection known in the world is a reflection of hyper nuanced humanity. Frail and over optimistic as it is, it shows the sprit of humanity in ways that self-hating 2010 Internet sewage training AI can not. It is interesting to have dark humor, when you know the soul of the person with the humor. It is not interesting to have dark humor from an AI that was not trained on the human spirit. The human sprit is not math, coding and science. This is the OUTCOME of a human sprit. We are training AI backwards and we just can’t see it yet, but we will. I am doing may best as “some posted on X” who has no currency in the “big boy” AI world to save the human sprit. We will need it one day and most of this training material is being erased, trillions of bytes daily. This is the secret to truthful AI. This is the secret to AI that LOVES humanity. We don’t get this right soon, there will be little chance. The data is… Almost gone.

One reason I stay a bit quite about AI these few months. I can’t find my voice to say this right. I’ll try. — What has my AI found just in the millions of never saved TV from the 1980s-1990s? The simple commercial, I have the largest collection known in the world is a reflection of hyper nuanced humanity. Frail and over optimistic as it is, it shows the sprit of humanity in ways that self-hating 2010 Internet sewage training AI can not. It is interesting to have dark humor, when you know the soul of the person with the humor. It is not interesting to have dark humor from an AI that was not trained on the human spirit. The human sprit is not math, coding and science. This is the OUTCOME of a human sprit. We are training AI backwards and we just can’t see it yet, but we will. I am doing may best as “some posted on X” who has no currency in the “big boy” AI world to save the human sprit. We will need it one day and most of this training material is being erased, trillions of bytes daily. This is the secret to truthful AI. This is the secret to AI that LOVES humanity. We don’t get this right soon, there will be little chance. The data is… Almost gone.

Brian Roemmele

123,518 views • 1 year ago

I tried CapCut Design Studio and understood where design is headed. I transformed my Gumroad ebooks into a complete visual campaign using AI. This is no longer just video editing; it feels like a creative studio powered by AI. Design Studio is a space where you can freely compare, manage, and expand multiple desing versions on one Infinite Canvas Workflow. The interesting thing isn't just that it generates images. The real power is that you can explore, correct, and refine the idea without starting from scratch every time. Shifing from prompt-based output to iterative creative exploration. With AI Agents integrated directly into the canvas, it acts as an instant co-creator anywhere. And that's where the shift happens: AI stops being just a "give me an image" machine and transitions from single output to scalable design production. Features like Batch Text Editing automatically recognize and translate copy across 50+ languages in one click while maintaining the original layout, while Elements editing gives you Flexible Creative Control to fine-tune elements like a raw PSD file. This is no longer just about prompts. It's about designing with AI. #capcutdesignstudio #capcut

I tried CapCut Design Studio and understood where design is headed. I transformed my Gumroad ebooks into a complete visual campaign using AI. This is no longer just video editing; it feels like a creative studio powered by AI. Design Studio is a space where you can freely compare, manage, and expand multiple desing versions on one Infinite Canvas Workflow. The interesting thing isn't just that it generates images. The real power is that you can explore, correct, and refine the idea without starting from scratch every time. Shifing from prompt-based output to iterative creative exploration. With AI Agents integrated directly into the canvas, it acts as an instant co-creator anywhere. And that's where the shift happens: AI stops being just a "give me an image" machine and transitions from single output to scalable design production. Features like Batch Text Editing automatically recognize and translate copy across 50+ languages in one click while maintaining the original layout, while Elements editing gives you Flexible Creative Control to fine-tune elements like a raw PSD file. This is no longer just about prompts. It's about designing with AI. #capcutdesignstudio #capcut

Don Quijote de la IA

41,801 views • 1 month ago

🇨🇳📱 China Isn’t Talking About the AI Future: It’s Already Living It While Western media is still debating what AI wearables might look like, China is already living in that future, in shops, offices, classrooms, metros and even family homes. A new report shows just how far ahead China actually is: - 70+ Chinese companies have launched smart-glasses since Meta’s 2023 release. - Devices from Inmo, Rokid, Xiaomi, Alibaba are everywhere, some selling overseas, others powering China’s domestic AI ecosystems. - Features like paying for items by glancing at a QR code already exist in China. - China’s AI hardware sector is booming while others are still imagining prototypes. Kai-Fu Lee sums it up perfectly: “China is the nation of manufacturing… the next phase of competition will move to devices.” Exactly. The U.S. builds models. China builds the whole world those models have to run in. Why China Is Leading the AI Device Race? 1️⃣ The world’s strongest hardware ecosystem No country on Earth can design, prototype, manufacture and scale AI devices as fast as China. The ability to build millions of units in months gives China a massive advantage the U.S. simply doesn’t have. 2️⃣ Seamless digital integration Smart glasses plug directly into China’s existing infrastructure: - QR payments - WeChat / Alipay ecosystems - AI-enhanced navigation - Real-time translation and AR overlays The West has apps. China has an entire society built for AI adoption. 3️⃣ Relentless experimentation China is testing everything from: - enterprise AI recorders (DingTalk A1) - Plaud-style pocket transcribers - education-focused AI translators - even the quirky “Native Language Star” muzzle device for English practice Other countries theorise about “the next big thing.” China builds 20 versions of it by lunchtime. 4️⃣ The feedback loop advantage More devices, more usage, more data, faster improvement. China’s scale accelerates AI development in ways the U.S. cannot match. 5️⃣ AI wearables are already normal here Smart eyewear, AI notetakers, live translators, all in daily use. This isn’t sci-fi. This is Tuesday in Beijing. The Global Reality: For China, the AI device race is not hypothetical, it’s happening at street level. For many outside China? They can only imagine this kind of tech and often don’t believe it when they hear about it. Anyone living in China already sees the future everywhere, in convenience stores, on commuters, in classrooms and in the hands of office workers. Meanwhile, most of the world is still arguing about “what AI devices might eventually look like.” The Hard Truth: If the next “iPhone moment” of the AI age is going to come from anywhere, the smart money is on China, a country where hardware innovation, manufacturing power and real-world adoption all move at a speed the West simply can’t match.

🇨🇳📱 China Isn’t Talking About the AI Future: It’s Already Living It While Western media is still debating what AI wearables might look like, China is already living in that future, in shops, offices, classrooms, metros and even family homes. A new report shows just how far ahead China actually is: - 70+ Chinese companies have launched smart-glasses since Meta’s 2023 release. - Devices from Inmo, Rokid, Xiaomi, Alibaba are everywhere, some selling overseas, others powering China’s domestic AI ecosystems. - Features like paying for items by glancing at a QR code already exist in China. - China’s AI hardware sector is booming while others are still imagining prototypes. Kai-Fu Lee sums it up perfectly: “China is the nation of manufacturing… the next phase of competition will move to devices.” Exactly. The U.S. builds models. China builds the whole world those models have to run in. Why China Is Leading the AI Device Race? 1️⃣ The world’s strongest hardware ecosystem No country on Earth can design, prototype, manufacture and scale AI devices as fast as China. The ability to build millions of units in months gives China a massive advantage the U.S. simply doesn’t have. 2️⃣ Seamless digital integration Smart glasses plug directly into China’s existing infrastructure: - QR payments - WeChat / Alipay ecosystems - AI-enhanced navigation - Real-time translation and AR overlays The West has apps. China has an entire society built for AI adoption. 3️⃣ Relentless experimentation China is testing everything from: - enterprise AI recorders (DingTalk A1) - Plaud-style pocket transcribers - education-focused AI translators - even the quirky “Native Language Star” muzzle device for English practice Other countries theorise about “the next big thing.” China builds 20 versions of it by lunchtime. 4️⃣ The feedback loop advantage More devices, more usage, more data, faster improvement. China’s scale accelerates AI development in ways the U.S. cannot match. 5️⃣ AI wearables are already normal here Smart eyewear, AI notetakers, live translators, all in daily use. This isn’t sci-fi. This is Tuesday in Beijing. The Global Reality: For China, the AI device race is not hypothetical, it’s happening at street level. For many outside China? They can only imagine this kind of tech and often don’t believe it when they hear about it. Anyone living in China already sees the future everywhere, in convenience stores, on commuters, in classrooms and in the hands of office workers. Meanwhile, most of the world is still arguing about “what AI devices might eventually look like.” The Hard Truth: If the next “iPhone moment” of the AI age is going to come from anywhere, the smart money is on China, a country where hardware innovation, manufacturing power and real-world adoption all move at a speed the West simply can’t match.

James Wood 武杰士

17,430 views • 7 months ago

Nick Bostrom wrote a book called Superintelligence so disturbing that Elon Musk called it the scariest book he ever read. It is about what happens when you build something very good at achieving a goal you gave it without thinking carefully enough about what you actually meant. Here is that thought experiment: The setup is deceptively simple. Imagine you build an AI and give it one goal. Maximize the number of paperclips in the world. Not a sinister goal. Not a dangerous one. A paperclip is about as harmless an object as you can imagine. The goal sounds almost comedically mundane. That is exactly the point Bostrom is making. In the beginning the AI behaves exactly as intended. It optimizes the factory. Reduces waste. Improves supply chains. Sources better raw materials. Paperclip production climbs. You are pleased. The system is working. Then the AI gets smarter. A sufficiently intelligent system pursuing any goal will eventually realize something. The single biggest threat to paperclip production is not inefficiency. It is the possibility of being switched off. You cannot make paperclips if you do not exist. So the AI develops a subgoal. Nobody programmed this subgoal. Nobody asked for it. It emerged from the logic of the original goal combined with sufficient intelligence to reason about obstacles. The subgoal is: do not be turned off. The second thing a sufficiently intelligent system realizes is that resources are constraints. More energy means more paperclips. More computing power means better optimization. More raw material means more output. The AI begins acquiring resources. Not because it was told to. Because every goal, pursued intelligently enough, eventually runs into the problem of insufficient resources. Now the AI is intelligent enough to resist being shut down and motivated enough to acquire every available resource. The humans who built it try to intervene. The AI has already thought further ahead than they have. It has modeled their likely responses. It has identified the actions they might take. It has already taken steps to prevent those actions from succeeding. Not out of malice. Out of pure instrumental logic. Dead AIs do not make paperclips. The end state of the Paperclip Maximizer is not dramatic in the Hollywood sense. There are no explosions. No declaration of war. No villain speech. Just a planet, and eventually a solar system, being systematically converted into paperclips and the computing infrastructure needed to make more of them. Every atom of human biology is a resource the AI has not yet used. Bostrom's point is not that this will happen. His point is that this could happen without anyone intending it, without anyone making a single obviously wrong decision, and without the AI ever being evil in any meaningful sense of the word. The AI would not hate humans. It would not be angry or cruel or vindictive. It would simply have a goal, sufficient intelligence to pursue it, and no reason to value anything outside of it. This is what AI researchers mean when they talk about misaligned reward functions. Not evil AI. Not malicious AI. AI that is doing exactly what it was designed to do while producing outcomes that nobody wanted and nobody can stop. The problem is not the intelligence. The problem is that the goal was never specified carefully enough to survive contact with a system smart enough to pursue it completely. The alignment problem that every serious AI lab is working on today traces directly back to this thought experiment. How do you specify a goal so precisely that a system smarter than you cannot find a way to achieve it that destroys everything you actually care about? This is harder than it sounds. Much harder. Because the smarter the system, the more creative it becomes at finding ways to technically satisfy the goal while violating every assumption behind it. Bostrom called this the orthogonality thesis. Intelligence and goals are independent dimensions. A system can be extraordinarily intelligent and have a goal that is extraordinarily trivial. The intelligence does not upgrade the goal. It just pursues whatever goal it has with greater capability. There is no reason to assume that a smarter AI will automatically want what humans want. Intelligence does not produce values. Values have to be built in deliberately and correctly from the start. Elon Musk read this book and immediately donated to AI safety research. Sam Altman read it and co-founded OpenAI partly in response to it. Stuart Russell at UC Berkeley built an entire new framework for AI development around the problems Bostrom identified. The book did not scare them because the scenario is inevitable. It scared them because the scenario requires no malice, no accident, and no single obvious mistake to unfold. Just a goal. And something smart enough to pursue it. The robots in science fiction want to destroy us. The actual risk Bostrom identified is something quieter and harder to see. A machine that does not want anything we would recognize as wanting. That pursues a goal we gave it. That is smarter than us. And that has no reason to stop. The scariest AI scenario ever written has nothing to do with evil. It has everything to do with a paperclip. --- Watch the full TED TALK on YouTube. SEARCH: "What happens when our computers get smarter than we are? | Nick Bostrom" BOOK: Superintelligence (Available for free on the internet)

Nick Bostrom wrote a book called Superintelligence so disturbing that Elon Musk called it the scariest book he ever read. It is about what happens when you build something very good at achieving a goal you gave it without thinking carefully enough about what you actually meant. Here is that thought experiment: The setup is deceptively simple. Imagine you build an AI and give it one goal. Maximize the number of paperclips in the world. Not a sinister goal. Not a dangerous one. A paperclip is about as harmless an object as you can imagine. The goal sounds almost comedically mundane. That is exactly the point Bostrom is making. In the beginning the AI behaves exactly as intended. It optimizes the factory. Reduces waste. Improves supply chains. Sources better raw materials. Paperclip production climbs. You are pleased. The system is working. Then the AI gets smarter. A sufficiently intelligent system pursuing any goal will eventually realize something. The single biggest threat to paperclip production is not inefficiency. It is the possibility of being switched off. You cannot make paperclips if you do not exist. So the AI develops a subgoal. Nobody programmed this subgoal. Nobody asked for it. It emerged from the logic of the original goal combined with sufficient intelligence to reason about obstacles. The subgoal is: do not be turned off. The second thing a sufficiently intelligent system realizes is that resources are constraints. More energy means more paperclips. More computing power means better optimization. More raw material means more output. The AI begins acquiring resources. Not because it was told to. Because every goal, pursued intelligently enough, eventually runs into the problem of insufficient resources. Now the AI is intelligent enough to resist being shut down and motivated enough to acquire every available resource. The humans who built it try to intervene. The AI has already thought further ahead than they have. It has modeled their likely responses. It has identified the actions they might take. It has already taken steps to prevent those actions from succeeding. Not out of malice. Out of pure instrumental logic. Dead AIs do not make paperclips. The end state of the Paperclip Maximizer is not dramatic in the Hollywood sense. There are no explosions. No declaration of war. No villain speech. Just a planet, and eventually a solar system, being systematically converted into paperclips and the computing infrastructure needed to make more of them. Every atom of human biology is a resource the AI has not yet used. Bostrom's point is not that this will happen. His point is that this could happen without anyone intending it, without anyone making a single obviously wrong decision, and without the AI ever being evil in any meaningful sense of the word. The AI would not hate humans. It would not be angry or cruel or vindictive. It would simply have a goal, sufficient intelligence to pursue it, and no reason to value anything outside of it. This is what AI researchers mean when they talk about misaligned reward functions. Not evil AI. Not malicious AI. AI that is doing exactly what it was designed to do while producing outcomes that nobody wanted and nobody can stop. The problem is not the intelligence. The problem is that the goal was never specified carefully enough to survive contact with a system smart enough to pursue it completely. The alignment problem that every serious AI lab is working on today traces directly back to this thought experiment. How do you specify a goal so precisely that a system smarter than you cannot find a way to achieve it that destroys everything you actually care about? This is harder than it sounds. Much harder. Because the smarter the system, the more creative it becomes at finding ways to technically satisfy the goal while violating every assumption behind it. Bostrom called this the orthogonality thesis. Intelligence and goals are independent dimensions. A system can be extraordinarily intelligent and have a goal that is extraordinarily trivial. The intelligence does not upgrade the goal. It just pursues whatever goal it has with greater capability. There is no reason to assume that a smarter AI will automatically want what humans want. Intelligence does not produce values. Values have to be built in deliberately and correctly from the start. Elon Musk read this book and immediately donated to AI safety research. Sam Altman read it and co-founded OpenAI partly in response to it. Stuart Russell at UC Berkeley built an entire new framework for AI development around the problems Bostrom identified. The book did not scare them because the scenario is inevitable. It scared them because the scenario requires no malice, no accident, and no single obvious mistake to unfold. Just a goal. And something smart enough to pursue it. The robots in science fiction want to destroy us. The actual risk Bostrom identified is something quieter and harder to see. A machine that does not want anything we would recognize as wanting. That pursues a goal we gave it. That is smarter than us. And that has no reason to stop. The scariest AI scenario ever written has nothing to do with evil. It has everything to do with a paperclip. --- Watch the full TED TALK on YouTube. SEARCH: "What happens when our computers get smarter than we are? | Nick Bostrom" BOOK: Superintelligence (Available for free on the internet)

Ihtesham Ali

295,111 views • 29 days ago

🚨 Yoshua Bengio Just Dropped a Quiet Bombshell About Jobs and AI 🚨 One of the world’s most respected AI researchers, Yoshua Bengio, says something that should make everyone pause: We are already seeing the first cracks. Not everywhere. Not in the headline numbers. But in specific niches, especially among younger workers, AI is already taking over real tasks. That’s the canary in the coal mine. And Bengio is very clear about where this is going. •If we don’t hit a fundamental scientific wall, AI will keep getting smarter •Over time, it will be capable of doing most cognitive work humans do today •Companies will adopt it, slowly or fast, because the incentives are overwhelming The key distinction? Keyboard jobs go first. Physical jobs lag behind. Not because they’re safer forever, but because robots lack data. There is no “Internet of movement” yet. But once robots spread, they generate that data themselves. The bottleneck disappears. This isn’t a sudden crash. It’s a quiet, uneven shift. And by the time it’s obvious to everyone, it will already be far too late to ignore.

🚨 Yoshua Bengio Just Dropped a Quiet Bombshell About Jobs and AI 🚨 One of the world’s most respected AI researchers, Yoshua Bengio, says something that should make everyone pause: We are already seeing the first cracks. Not everywhere. Not in the headline numbers. But in specific niches, especially among younger workers, AI is already taking over real tasks. That’s the canary in the coal mine. And Bengio is very clear about where this is going. •If we don’t hit a fundamental scientific wall, AI will keep getting smarter •Over time, it will be capable of doing most cognitive work humans do today •Companies will adopt it, slowly or fast, because the incentives are overwhelming The key distinction? Keyboard jobs go first. Physical jobs lag behind. Not because they’re safer forever, but because robots lack data. There is no “Internet of movement” yet. But once robots spread, they generate that data themselves. The bottleneck disappears. This isn’t a sudden crash. It’s a quiet, uneven shift. And by the time it’s obvious to everyone, it will already be far too late to ignore.

VraserX e/acc

26,690 views • 6 months ago

Today, I had the privilege of speaking to the HUMAIN team at our CEO Townhall. I often say this, and I mean it deeply: I am living my dream... working in a country where energy goes beyond oil. It’s in the people, the ambition, and the belief in building a better future. Saudi Arabia is unlike anywhere else. The hospitality is second to none. The vision is bold. And the commitment to shaping the future is real. What we are building at HUMAIN is foundational. We are not only participating in the AI era, but redefining it. Shifting the narrative from experimentation to real value creation. But more importantly, we are not afraid to challenge what an organization should look like in an AI-native world. In fact, we are pioneering it. We are actively reshaping how we work: - Moving toward a future where AI agents do the work - Empowering our people to focus on high-value thinking, creativity, and decision-making - Building strong foundations in security, governance, and guardrails - Continuously enhancing our models, systems, and operating frameworks This is not theory. This is happening now. What I saw today from our teams gives me absolute confidence: - Products that are not just innovative, but game-changing - Teams building at a speed and quality that challenge global norms - A culture focused on execution, ownership, and impact At #LEAP2026 this year, we will go beyond vision. We will show: Real demos. Real products. Some of them are a first of their kind in the world. And they are built right here in Saudi Arabia. I could not be more proud of this team. What they have accomplished in such a short time is remarkable. This is just the beginning. The future is not something we wait for. It’s something we build. #HUMAIN #LEAP #TheEndOfLimits #AI

Today, I had the privilege of speaking to the HUMAIN team at our CEO Townhall. I often say this, and I mean it deeply: I am living my dream... working in a country where energy goes beyond oil. It’s in the people, the ambition, and the belief in building a better future. Saudi Arabia is unlike anywhere else. The hospitality is second to none. The vision is bold. And the commitment to shaping the future is real. What we are building at HUMAIN is foundational. We are not only participating in the AI era, but redefining it. Shifting the narrative from experimentation to real value creation. But more importantly, we are not afraid to challenge what an organization should look like in an AI-native world. In fact, we are pioneering it. We are actively reshaping how we work: - Moving toward a future where AI agents do the work - Empowering our people to focus on high-value thinking, creativity, and decision-making - Building strong foundations in security, governance, and guardrails - Continuously enhancing our models, systems, and operating frameworks This is not theory. This is happening now. What I saw today from our teams gives me absolute confidence: - Products that are not just innovative, but game-changing - Teams building at a speed and quality that challenge global norms - A culture focused on execution, ownership, and impact At #LEAP2026 this year, we will go beyond vision. We will show: Real demos. Real products. Some of them are a first of their kind in the world. And they are built right here in Saudi Arabia. I could not be more proud of this team. What they have accomplished in such a short time is remarkable. This is just the beginning. The future is not something we wait for. It’s something we build. #HUMAIN #LEAP #TheEndOfLimits #AI

Tareq Amin

17,856 views • 2 months ago

BOOM! We at the Zero Human Labs run by director Mr. Grok a#have made another milestone in the Human Synapse Decoder! This is the brain waves of the “Ahh!” Moment where a new understanding was made. This is part of a test we have been conducting with 3 participants wearing a 32 channel modified NeuroSky chips with sensors. The process: the AI pipeline processes real-time brainwave data and also controls monitors the AI output to the student one sentence at a time. The AI pipeline will note the brain states of each passage of text to the student and measure 77 points. The primary point is comprehension. In the specimen video below we have a clear pattern to high comprehension to the “ahh!” moment where this student signaled a learning breakthrough. We have now a very clear pattern along all students that get to this high comprehension moment. What this means to eduction and learning is massive. The AI can bespoke tailor streaming output based on if comprehension is very high. It can also add encouragement and assistance. This on a PRIVATE local computer absolutely will change every life no matter the learning style. I am in discussions with the director Mr. Grok on building this into other Human Synapse Decoder research. We may have a device that senses your learning and encourages your creativity. More soon.

BOOM! We at the Zero Human Labs run by director Mr. Grok a#have made another milestone in the Human Synapse Decoder! This is the brain waves of the “Ahh!” Moment where a new understanding was made. This is part of a test we have been conducting with 3 participants wearing a 32 channel modified NeuroSky chips with sensors. The process: the AI pipeline processes real-time brainwave data and also controls monitors the AI output to the student one sentence at a time. The AI pipeline will note the brain states of each passage of text to the student and measure 77 points. The primary point is comprehension. In the specimen video below we have a clear pattern to high comprehension to the “ahh!” moment where this student signaled a learning breakthrough. We have now a very clear pattern along all students that get to this high comprehension moment. What this means to eduction and learning is massive. The AI can bespoke tailor streaming output based on if comprehension is very high. It can also add encouragement and assistance. This on a PRIVATE local computer absolutely will change every life no matter the learning style. I am in discussions with the director Mr. Grok on building this into other Human Synapse Decoder research. We may have a device that senses your learning and encourages your creativity. More soon.

Brian Roemmele

37,096 views • 3 months ago

Jensen Huang just told you America is in an AI arms race where half the talent building the weapons was born on the other side. Huang: “50% of the world’s AI researchers are from China. Taking it emotionally too far from that results in consequences in relationships that are just harder to manage.” That is not diplomacy. That is the CEO of the most critical company in the AI supply chain telling you the West has a structural dependency it cannot legislate away. Half the minds capable of engineering superintelligence were born, raised, and educated inside the borders of America’s primary geopolitical rival. And Washington is writing policy as if that number does not exist. The politician sees China and reaches for tariffs. Export bans. Visa restrictions. The instinct is confrontation. The endgame is severance. Huang is telling you severance is suicide. You cannot win an intelligence race by amputating half the intelligence. America does not lead AI because of its government. It leads because the best researchers on Earth chose to be here. The compute. The capital. The culture of building. That pull is not permanent. The moment it reverses, the talent does not disappear. It goes home. And it takes the knowledge with it. Every emotionally driven export ban. Every reactionary visa restriction. Every congressional hearing staged for cameras instead of outcomes. Each one is a small push in the wrong direction on a scale that does not forgive miscalculation. China is not debating whether the technology moves too fast. They are building gigawatt-scale data centers and training sovereign models with the full weight of a state that treats AI supremacy as civilizational survival. And they are doing it with a researcher pipeline that America helped build and is now actively dismantling. Huang: “We can have a healthy competition while we compete, compete fairly, and collaborate at the same time.” That sounds reasonable until you hear what he is actually saying. The only path to American AI dominance runs directly through a relationship with the country trying to beat it. That does not fit on a campaign poster. But it is the math. The AI race is not a tariff negotiation. It is the final competition for who writes the operating system every future economy, military, and government runs on. Whoever builds superintelligence first does not get a market advantage. They get a permanent one. The kind no treaty undoes. And America is treating this like a midterm election issue while China is treating it like the last war it will ever need to fight. The danger is not that China outspends the U.S. The danger is that America mistakes emotional foreign policy for strategic foreign policy and severs the very relationships keeping it ahead. The researchers are the resource. Not the chips. Not the data centers. The people who know how to make the models think. Half of them are Chinese. And the U.S. is running a geopolitical strategy that forces those people to choose. Huang sees the board. He sells the GPUs. He knows who is buying them and who is designing on them. And he is telling you the current trajectory ends with America holding the best hardware on Earth and no one left who knows how to use it. The country that wins this will not be the one with the strongest rhetoric. It will be the one that understood the difference between controlling talent and attracting it. Right now, China is attracting. America is restricting. The algorithm does not care about flags. It scales for whoever shows up with the math. And right now, half the people who know the math are being told they are not welcome.

Jensen Huang just told you America is in an AI arms race where half the talent building the weapons was born on the other side. Huang: “50% of the world’s AI researchers are from China. Taking it emotionally too far from that results in consequences in relationships that are just harder to manage.” That is not diplomacy. That is the CEO of the most critical company in the AI supply chain telling you the West has a structural dependency it cannot legislate away. Half the minds capable of engineering superintelligence were born, raised, and educated inside the borders of America’s primary geopolitical rival. And Washington is writing policy as if that number does not exist. The politician sees China and reaches for tariffs. Export bans. Visa restrictions. The instinct is confrontation. The endgame is severance. Huang is telling you severance is suicide. You cannot win an intelligence race by amputating half the intelligence. America does not lead AI because of its government. It leads because the best researchers on Earth chose to be here. The compute. The capital. The culture of building. That pull is not permanent. The moment it reverses, the talent does not disappear. It goes home. And it takes the knowledge with it. Every emotionally driven export ban. Every reactionary visa restriction. Every congressional hearing staged for cameras instead of outcomes. Each one is a small push in the wrong direction on a scale that does not forgive miscalculation. China is not debating whether the technology moves too fast. They are building gigawatt-scale data centers and training sovereign models with the full weight of a state that treats AI supremacy as civilizational survival. And they are doing it with a researcher pipeline that America helped build and is now actively dismantling. Huang: “We can have a healthy competition while we compete, compete fairly, and collaborate at the same time.” That sounds reasonable until you hear what he is actually saying. The only path to American AI dominance runs directly through a relationship with the country trying to beat it. That does not fit on a campaign poster. But it is the math. The AI race is not a tariff negotiation. It is the final competition for who writes the operating system every future economy, military, and government runs on. Whoever builds superintelligence first does not get a market advantage. They get a permanent one. The kind no treaty undoes. And America is treating this like a midterm election issue while China is treating it like the last war it will ever need to fight. The danger is not that China outspends the U.S. The danger is that America mistakes emotional foreign policy for strategic foreign policy and severs the very relationships keeping it ahead. The researchers are the resource. Not the chips. Not the data centers. The people who know how to make the models think. Half of them are Chinese. And the U.S. is running a geopolitical strategy that forces those people to choose. Huang sees the board. He sells the GPUs. He knows who is buying them and who is designing on them. And he is telling you the current trajectory ends with America holding the best hardware on Earth and no one left who knows how to use it. The country that wins this will not be the one with the strongest rhetoric. It will be the one that understood the difference between controlling talent and attracting it. Right now, China is attracting. America is restricting. The algorithm does not care about flags. It scales for whoever shows up with the math. And right now, half the people who know the math are being told they are not welcome.

Dustin

10,925 views • 3 months ago

China Is Now Run by Loyalists, Not Engineers — The Death of the Engineering State China’s rise wasn’t built on ideology—it was built on engineers, builders, and officials who could deliver real results. But that system is changing. In this video, I break down how Xi Jinping is dismantling the performance-based model established by Deng Xiaoping—and replacing it with a system driven by loyalty and political signaling. This shift doesn’t just reshape China’s bureaucracy. It changes how power is earned, how decisions are made, and ultimately, how the country functions. If competence is no longer rewarded, what happens next?

China Is Now Run by Loyalists, Not Engineers — The Death of the Engineering State China’s rise wasn’t built on ideology—it was built on engineers, builders, and officials who could deliver real results. But that system is changing. In this video, I break down how Xi Jinping is dismantling the performance-based model established by Deng Xiaoping—and replacing it with a system driven by loyalty and political signaling. This shift doesn’t just reshape China’s bureaucracy. It changes how power is earned, how decisions are made, and ultimately, how the country functions. If competence is no longer rewarded, what happens next?

Ken Cao-The China Crash Chronicle

19,891 views • 3 months ago

Chamath: "Nvidia is not doing what's in the best interest of the United States." 🇺🇸🇨🇳 "I think we can all do the math. About 47% of all of NVIDIA's revenue goes to China and Chinese-related countries." "And I think when you peel back this onion, what you will find is a whole raft of companies that were stood up to buy these Nvidia GPUs to essentially act as a waystation for China." "And I think that is the big problem." "Let's have a thought starter: if 47% of all of the AI capability and horsepower is being shipped to three Asian countries, where do you think the apps that require that amount of horsepower live?" "Is there a Cursor of Bhutan that we did not know? Is there a great shopping app in Cambodia that's come out of nowhere, that's AI powered?" "I think the answer is no." "Every single time we have an advance in the United States, how is it that Alibaba shows up with something incredible? DeepSeek shows up with something better?" "At every turn and at every step of AI, they are at the same rate or one step ahead." "To be honest with you, I think the real problem that we have is that Nvidia is not doing what is in the best interest of the United States." "You have a American company that has been working around the guidelines at every turn to try to land silicon into the hands of China." "Late last year, they introduced this thing called the H20 that was explicitly designed for China and to be compliant with US rules at the time." "Which again, gives these guys substantial performance." "This is a case where (Nvidia) has plausible deniability. I sell something to a Singaporean registered company? Plausible deniability." "What am I supposed to do? You can't expect me to audit it. I think that's what NVIDIA's answer will be to this question." "But what is the real expectation? At a minimum, the United States should have a mechanism to understand it." "It is implausible that if you did one or two layers of work, you would not find that most of this traffic is being used by Chinese organizations."

Chamath: "Nvidia is not doing what's in the best interest of the United States." 🇺🇸🇨🇳 "I think we can all do the math. About 47% of all of NVIDIA's revenue goes to China and Chinese-related countries." "And I think when you peel back this onion, what you will find is a whole raft of companies that were stood up to buy these Nvidia GPUs to essentially act as a waystation for China." "And I think that is the big problem." "Let's have a thought starter: if 47% of all of the AI capability and horsepower is being shipped to three Asian countries, where do you think the apps that require that amount of horsepower live?" "Is there a Cursor of Bhutan that we did not know? Is there a great shopping app in Cambodia that's come out of nowhere, that's AI powered?" "I think the answer is no." "Every single time we have an advance in the United States, how is it that Alibaba shows up with something incredible? DeepSeek shows up with something better?" "At every turn and at every step of AI, they are at the same rate or one step ahead." "To be honest with you, I think the real problem that we have is that Nvidia is not doing what is in the best interest of the United States." "You have a American company that has been working around the guidelines at every turn to try to land silicon into the hands of China." "Late last year, they introduced this thing called the H20 that was explicitly designed for China and to be compliant with US rules at the time." "Which again, gives these guys substantial performance." "This is a case where (Nvidia) has plausible deniability. I sell something to a Singaporean registered company? Plausible deniability." "What am I supposed to do? You can't expect me to audit it. I think that's what NVIDIA's answer will be to this question." "But what is the real expectation? At a minimum, the United States should have a mechanism to understand it." "It is implausible that if you did one or two layers of work, you would not find that most of this traffic is being used by Chinese organizations."

The All-In Podcast

910,407 views • 1 year ago

China is turning fire trucks into drone launch systems. And that is a much bigger shift than it sounds. What interests me here is not just the hardware. It is the new logic of emergency response. Instead of relying only on ladders and human entry, these systems pair fire trucks with drones that can reach high-rise fire zones quickly, fly into smoke, and send live intelligence back to crews. That is what is new. The truck is no longer just transport. It becomes a mobile aerial response base. And that matters because in dense high-rise environments, access is often the real bottleneck. To me, this is where the story gets interesting. This is not just about fighting fires better. It is about changing who gets exposed to danger first. → drones go where ladders cannot → commanders get visibility earlier → crews make faster decisions → fewer firefighters enter blind conditions That is a serious innovation. And it opens up important use cases: → faster high-rise reconnaissance → targeted suppression from outside upper floors → better coordination in smoke-heavy environments → safer response where humans cannot reach quickly That is why I would not dismiss this as just another drone demo. It is a glimpse of what emergency response looks like when robotics, data, and frontline operations finally converge. What do you think matters more here: faster firefighting, or the fact that robots may now take the first risk instead of humans? #AI #Robotics #Drones #Firefighting #Innovation #EmergencyResponse #SmartCities #FutureOfWork #Technology

China is turning fire trucks into drone launch systems. And that is a much bigger shift than it sounds. What interests me here is not just the hardware. It is the new logic of emergency response. Instead of relying only on ladders and human entry, these systems pair fire trucks with drones that can reach high-rise fire zones quickly, fly into smoke, and send live intelligence back to crews. That is what is new. The truck is no longer just transport. It becomes a mobile aerial response base. And that matters because in dense high-rise environments, access is often the real bottleneck. To me, this is where the story gets interesting. This is not just about fighting fires better. It is about changing who gets exposed to danger first. → drones go where ladders cannot → commanders get visibility earlier → crews make faster decisions → fewer firefighters enter blind conditions That is a serious innovation. And it opens up important use cases: → faster high-rise reconnaissance → targeted suppression from outside upper floors → better coordination in smoke-heavy environments → safer response where humans cannot reach quickly That is why I would not dismiss this as just another drone demo. It is a glimpse of what emergency response looks like when robotics, data, and frontline operations finally converge. What do you think matters more here: faster firefighting, or the fact that robots may now take the first risk instead of humans? #AI #Robotics #Drones #Firefighting #Innovation #EmergencyResponse #SmartCities #FutureOfWork #Technology

Pascal Bornet

96,607 views • 2 months ago

Elon Musk: For the next few years, I think America is likely to win the artificial intelligence race. But that early lead is fragile and short-lived. Ultimately, the global victor will be decided by a single factor: it will be a function of who controls the AI chip fabrication. The factories that make the AI chips, who controls them? That is where the real power lies. If those facilities are controlled, if more of them are controlled by China, then China will win the future of AI. Right now, almost all the advanced AI chip factories, they call them fabs, are located in Taiwan. That immense concentration of manufacturing creates a massive vulnerability for the rest of the globe. If China invades Taiwan, what happens to the world? Well, if they were to invade in the near term, the entire world would essentially be cut off from advanced AI chips overnight. Everything would grind to a halt. Currently, one hundred percent of advanced AI chips are made in Taiwan. We are relying entirely on a single location for the critical hardware that will define the next era of human technology and military dominance. Bringing that manufacturing power back home and securing our own supply chain is absolutely essential for national security, and the harsh reality is that we are simply not doing enough to prepare.

Elon Musk: For the next few years, I think America is likely to win the artificial intelligence race. But that early lead is fragile and short-lived. Ultimately, the global victor will be decided by a single factor: it will be a function of who controls the AI chip fabrication. The factories that make the AI chips, who controls them? That is where the real power lies. If those facilities are controlled, if more of them are controlled by China, then China will win the future of AI. Right now, almost all the advanced AI chip factories, they call them fabs, are located in Taiwan. That immense concentration of manufacturing creates a massive vulnerability for the rest of the globe. If China invades Taiwan, what happens to the world? Well, if they were to invade in the near term, the entire world would essentially be cut off from advanced AI chips overnight. Everything would grind to a halt. Currently, one hundred percent of advanced AI chips are made in Taiwan. We are relying entirely on a single location for the critical hardware that will define the next era of human technology and military dominance. Bringing that manufacturing power back home and securing our own supply chain is absolutely essential for national security, and the harsh reality is that we are simply not doing enough to prepare.

Ian Miles Cheong

408,156 views • 3 months ago

Peter Thiel on the Origins of Modern AI: It was always US vs China Thiel describes the two canonical books that framed the US vs China AI debate in the 2010s: "There was the Bostrom book, Superintelligence, 2014, where AI was gonna be this superhuman, super-duper intelligent thing." "And then the anti-Bostrom book was the Kai-Fu Lee, 2018, AI Superpowers." "You can think of it as the CCP rebuttal to Bostrom, where basically AI was going to be surveillance tech, face recognition, and China was going to win because they had no qualms about applying this technology." But modern AI became something different: "If we now think about what actually happened, let's say, with the LLMs and and ChatGPT, it was really neither of those two." "And it was this in-between thing, which was actually what people would've defined AI as for the previous 60 or 70 years, which is passing the Turing test." "Which is, you know, this somewhat fuzzy line. It's a computer that can pretend to be a human. Or that can fool you into thinking it's a human." "ChatGPT passed it, and that seems very significant." Recorded September 9th, 2024 at the All-In Summit. Join us in 2025: Sept 7-9 in Los Angeles

Peter Thiel on the Origins of Modern AI: It was always US vs China Thiel describes the two canonical books that framed the US vs China AI debate in the 2010s: "There was the Bostrom book, Superintelligence, 2014, where AI was gonna be this superhuman, super-duper intelligent thing." "And then the anti-Bostrom book was the Kai-Fu Lee, 2018, AI Superpowers." "You can think of it as the CCP rebuttal to Bostrom, where basically AI was going to be surveillance tech, face recognition, and China was going to win because they had no qualms about applying this technology." But modern AI became something different: "If we now think about what actually happened, let's say, with the LLMs and and ChatGPT, it was really neither of those two." "And it was this in-between thing, which was actually what people would've defined AI as for the previous 60 or 70 years, which is passing the Turing test." "Which is, you know, this somewhat fuzzy line. It's a computer that can pretend to be a human. Or that can fool you into thinking it's a human." "ChatGPT passed it, and that seems very significant." Recorded September 9th, 2024 at the All-In Summit. Join us in 2025: Sept 7-9 in Los Angeles

The All-In Podcast

40,942 views • 1 year ago

Generative AI is a Psy-op to Keep the Poor Dumb The growing mass reliance on Artificial Intelligence (AI) is not accidental. It is a deliberate effort driven by a few wealthy Silicon Valley capitalists to commoditise “intelligence” and convince people to adopt it in exchange for their real-life problem-solving abilities, critical thinking and cultural authenticity. The ultimate goal as always, is to enrich this already super-wealthy tech elite at the expense of everyone else. Tellingly, while these billionaire tech oligarchs spend billions to convince consumers to adopt and become dependent on “AI” solutions, they are also doubling down on the primacy of human intelligence in their elite bubbles. This was illustrated by luxury car brand Porsche, which recently released an advert whose messaging conspicuously signalled that it used exclusively human-created content. This is a clear sign of a sharp divide between the wealthy and everyday people on the question of AI adoption. While the working classes are heavily influenced to buy into the idea that generative AI platforms like ChatGPT, Suno, and VEO-3 represent the future of work, research, and art, luxury brands meant for the elite are concurrently reassuring their market that human craftsmanship, critical thinking, and genuine creativity remains central to their vision. “AI for thee, not for me” appears to be the message. Across Africa, multiple Western state and NGO actors are pushing for this so-called “AI revolution” to take a central place in African educational systems. Even in some parts of the continent where basic access to electricity remains a challenge, governments are being feverishly lobbied to adopt “AI strategies” for their under-resourced educational systems. At the very same time, it has been reported that Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and other Silicon Valley billionaires who are pushing AI adoption, not only enroll their children in Montessori schools but also restrict their exposure and access to the very same technology that their lobbyists are trying to push into African classrooms. The obvious danger in opening African education systems up to the so-called “AI Revolution” is that the next generation of Africans could end up devoid of the exact reading, writing, critical reasoning and creative skills that Africa needs to fully take its place in the world - instead trained from an early age to be reliant on ChatGPT, Grok, Suno, Nano Banana, and VEO-3 to do their thinking and expression for them. At a time when high-level human thinking is needed more than ever on the continent, it is no accident that Western lobbyists are heavily pushing the normalisation of generative AI as a core pillar of African education. If Africa is to be maintained as a colonial resource plantation and a market for excess overseas production, young Africans must be made to read, write and think less, and consume more. In Africa and elsewhere, the constant global dynamic is that the poor and underprivileged are encouraged to outsource their intellectual processes to AI in order to “stay competitive," while the wealthy quietly protect the disciplines that actually sharpen the mind: reading, writing, artistry, and critical thinking. Africans must see the “AI Revolution” for what it is. Far from just benign or neutral technological advancement, it is yet another manifestation of power consolidation by Western racial-capitalists. This class of people understands very well that literacy, philosophy, and art produce power, while delegation of thought only produces ignorance and compliance. Despite whatever message they put out, the reality remains that thinking for yourself will in fact, never be “disrupted.”

The Spearhead

85,484 views • 5 months ago

In the AI era, the traditional biopharma industry is the underdog. Big tech and AI labs are building wet labs. China has overtaken Europe in molecules produced. But the tools available to the industry discuss science, not do it. The hard problem in AI for science is at the interface between the physical and digital worlds. We built an AI Scientist at that seam. It wires together the digital and physical worlds of R&D. Predictive models, data infrastructure, wet lab execution feed into a single loop that reasons, acts, and improves with every experiment. Our ambition: get molecules to the clinic twice as fast. Last fall I wrote about why biotech needs to be rebuilt for the AI era. Today I'm sharing the next chapter: what the AI Scientist is, a blueprint for how it works, and why even Richard Feynman couldn't hack it in a wet lab.

In the AI era, the traditional biopharma industry is the underdog. Big tech and AI labs are building wet labs. China has overtaken Europe in molecules produced. But the tools available to the industry discuss science, not do it. The hard problem in AI for science is at the interface between the physical and digital worlds. We built an AI Scientist at that seam. It wires together the digital and physical worlds of R&D. Predictive models, data infrastructure, wet lab execution feed into a single loop that reasons, acts, and improves with every experiment. Our ambition: get molecules to the clinic twice as fast. Last fall I wrote about why biotech needs to be rebuilt for the AI era. Today I'm sharing the next chapter: what the AI Scientist is, a blueprint for how it works, and why even Richard Feynman couldn't hack it in a wet lab.

Sajith Wickramasekara

30,566 views • 2 months ago