正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🇺🇸🇮🇱🇹🇷 BREAKING: U.S. envoy warns Israel Turkey war could trigger ‘World War Three’ U.S. envoy Tom Barrack suggested Israel’s strike on a Syrian air base may have been intended to draw Turkey into a confrontation ahead of Israeli elections. Barrack said no Turkish military assets were present at the...

286,732 次观看 • 6 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🇮🇱🇸🇾🇹🇷🇺🇸⚡️ Benjamin Netanyahu’s decision to publicly claim responsibility for Israel’s strike on Syria’s Abu al-Duhur airbase has reportedly triggered frustration inside Israel’s own security establishment, where officials wanted the sensitive operation to remain deliberately low-profile. According to i24NEWS, criticism within Israel’s security services concerns both Netanyahu’s public acknowledgment of the operation and recent statements by Defense Minister Israel Katz. Security officials reportedly preferred to avoid extensively publicizing the strike as tensions with Turkey rise. The concern is hardly theoretical: U.S. envoy Tom Barrack said the incident brought Israel and Turkey “a step away” from direct military confrontation, warning that inadequate coordination could have produced an unintended escalation. The political dimension is also increasingly difficult to ignore. Axios reports that some senior U.S. officials believe the timing of the strike may have been influenced partly by Israel’s October elections, while Washington is already frustrated that the operation complicated its attempts to de-escalate tensions between Israel, Syria and Turkey. For Netanyahu, a limited confrontation in Syria may project decisiveness after prolonged conflicts in Gaza, Lebanon and Iran, but turning tactical military action into domestic political messaging carries a serious risk when the other major player involved is Turkey. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

25,854 次观看 • 7 天前

ISRAEL ALMOST STARTED A WAR WITH TURKEY, AND NO ONE, NOT EVEN TRUMP, SAW IT COMING… Israel’s strike in Syria almost started a war with Turkey, and Trump’s Special Envoy just gave me an extraordinary account of how it happened According to Ambassador Tom Barrack, Israel received intelligence suggesting Turkey might be moving military assets onto a Syrian airbase. Washington checked, and confirmed it WAS NOT happening. The concern was communicated, the intelligence was examined, and Syria believed the issue was being handled through diplomatic channels, including a two-hour backchannel discussion between Syria’s foreign minister and the head of Mossad. Then jets appeared anyway, and Israel struck the runways without notifying either Washington or Turkey. That's where this stopped being another Israeli strike on Syria and became something potentially far more dangerous. Turkey saw the aircraft approaching and, not knowing their purpose or target, began confronting the possibility that it would have to scramble its own jets. It could have triggered a direct military confrontation between two of America’s most important regional partners, one of them a NATO member. Asked why Israel would take such a risk, Ambassador Barrack offered two theories. One was a catastrophic breakdown in communication between Mossad, the IDF and Netanyahu’s office. The other? “The Israelis were baiting the Turks.” My bet is on the latter… Behind all of this sits an even bigger strategic contest. Ambassador Barrack says Israel wants Syria kept clear of military systems that could interfere with its access to Iran, describing Syrian airspace as providing Israel with a “clear line of sight to Iran.” Turkey, meanwhile, is becoming increasingly entrenched as a military and political power inside the new Syria; so this wasn’t simply another airstrike. It was a glimpse of the fault line emerging underneath the post-Assad Middle East: Turkey wants to help build and secure the new Syria; Israel wants to ensure that Syria can never obstruct its freedom to strike Iran. For a few extremely dangerous moments, those two ambitions appear to have nearly met in the sky. And next time, cooler heads may not get there first. Ambassador Tom Barrack

Mario Nawfal

1,045,183 次观看 • 7 天前

🇮🇱🇹🇷🇮🇷 Israel knew Turkey was moving military assets into Syria. Mossad warned Damascus. Washington was mediating. Syria denied the deployment and gave assurances. Then Israel bombed the airbase anyway. Veteran war correspondent Elijah Magnier thinks the interesting part is not the strike itself, but who Netanyahu chose to address afterward. He could have said Israel spotted Syrian pilots, Sukhois or a rebuilt air force and decided to destroy them. Instead, he publicly framed the strike around Turkey. Magnier's reading: the real audience was Israeli voters. Because he does not believe Netanyahu actually wants a war with Turkey. Turkey has a million-man NATO military, ballistic missiles, serious air defences and one of the region's most capable drone fleets. It also happens to be a country Israel has continued doing business with throughout the Gaza war. So publicly, the two sides trade threats. Privately, the trade keeps moving. And Turkey's military presence in Syria is hardly new. Ankara has been operating there since 2016. Israel tolerated it for years. Magnier's argument is that the problem was never Turkey being in Syria, but what Turkey might now be doing there. His broader theory is even more uncomfortable for Israel: Syria's collapse created a power vacuum, but the vacuum is no longer necessarily working in Israel's favour. That also explains why Magnier believes Israel has little interest in a real deal with Damascus. Because a sovereign Syria eventually raises the Golan Heights. Then comes Iran. Magnier says Turkey has become Tehran's most important route around US sanctions, while Ankara has consistently refused to enforce Washington's unilateral sanctions. His logic is brutally practical: why sacrifice billions in trade and a strategic neighbour to satisfy a U.S. president who may have only two years left? And if Iran is being invited into a regional security pact, Magnier thinks Tehran is unlikely to show up merely to become another signature on somebody else's document. Iran survived the war. It controls the pressure point at Hormuz. If it joins a new regional security architecture, his argument is simple: Iran won't be signing the rules. Iran will be writing them. Elijah J. Magnier 🇪🇺

Mario Nawfal

306,489 次观看 • 5 天前