Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

🚨 BREAKING: Jon Ossoff: "Was the intelligence community's assessment that there was an imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime?" Tulsi Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what constitutes an imminent threat and what does not is the president. It is not the responsibility of the intelligence... show more

GBC

146,624 subscribers

29,441 просмотров • 8 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 3

Фото профиля Principal⭐️

Principal⭐️8 дней назад

That exchange highlights a serious question about accountability: intelligence agencies assess threats, while the president makes the ultimate policy judgment. Both roles need to remain clear and transparent.

Фото профиля J

J8 дней назад

We all know there was not a nuclear threat

Фото профиля JK

JK7 дней назад

A ridiculous combo of statements by Gabbard. We obliterated Iran's nuclear capability. They had made no attempt to rebuild their capability. Yet Iran represents an imminent nuclear threat because they intend to restart their nuclear program... This admin is the imminent threat.

Похожие видео

Senator Ossoff: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."

Senator Ossoff: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."

unusual_whales

356,379 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

.Ossoff's Office: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" DNI Tulsi Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."

.Ossoff's Office: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" DNI Tulsi Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."

CSPAN

678,284 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

In an exchange with Sen. Jon Ossoff at the Senate's Worldwide Threats hearing, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said it's not her job to determine what is an "imminent threat." Gabbard told lawmakers that "the only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president." Read more:

In an exchange with Sen. Jon Ossoff at the Senate's Worldwide Threats hearing, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said it's not her job to determine what is an "imminent threat." Gabbard told lawmakers that "the only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president." Read more:

CNN

238,359 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

WATCH: After stating that the assessment of the Intelligence Community (IC) is that “Iran’s nuclear enrichment program was obliterated” by last year’s airstrikes, DNI Tulsi Gabbard repeatedly refuses to say whether it was the IC’s asessment that Iran posed an “imminent nuclear threat” as of March 1, 2026, as claimed by the White House. “It is not the Intelligence Community’s responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat,” she says. Sen. Jon Ossoff: “This is the ‘Worldwide Threats’ hearing... You are here to represent the IC’s ‘assessment of threats.’ That’s a quote from your own opening statement...”

WATCH: After stating that the assessment of the Intelligence Community (IC) is that “Iran’s nuclear enrichment program was obliterated” by last year’s airstrikes, DNI Tulsi Gabbard repeatedly refuses to say whether it was the IC’s asessment that Iran posed an “imminent nuclear threat” as of March 1, 2026, as claimed by the White House. “It is not the Intelligence Community’s responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat,” she says. Sen. Jon Ossoff: “This is the ‘Worldwide Threats’ hearing... You are here to represent the IC’s ‘assessment of threats.’ That’s a quote from your own opening statement...”

Decensored News

24,333 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

OSSOFF: Your opening statement stated that as a result of last summer's airstrikes, Iran's nuclear enrichment program was 'obliterated.' Correct? GABBARD: That's right OSSOFF: The WH stated on March 1 that this war was launched to 'eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime.' Does the IC assess that there was an imminent nuclear threat? GABBARD: The only person who can determine what is or is not an imminent threat is the president OSSOFF: False

OSSOFF: Your opening statement stated that as a result of last summer's airstrikes, Iran's nuclear enrichment program was 'obliterated.' Correct? GABBARD: That's right OSSOFF: The WH stated on March 1 that this war was launched to 'eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime.' Does the IC assess that there was an imminent nuclear threat? GABBARD: The only person who can determine what is or is not an imminent threat is the president OSSOFF: False

Aaron Rupar

792,584 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Tulsi Gabbard: 🚨 The Intelligence Community did not assess an imminent nuclear threat from Iran following last Summer’s airstrike Ossoffd: The IC determined that Iran’s nuclear enrichment program enrichment program was obliterated by last summers airstrike. Correct? Gabbard: Yes… Ossoff: Last night, you stated there’s been no effort since then to rebuild their enrichment capability, correct? Gabbard: That’s right.. Ossoff: The WH says this new war was launched to eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by Iran. —— “Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: The IC determined that Iran maintained the intention to rebuild and grow their nuclear enrichment capabilities. ——The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: False…

Tulsi Gabbard: 🚨 The Intelligence Community did not assess an imminent nuclear threat from Iran following last Summer’s airstrike Ossoffd: The IC determined that Iran’s nuclear enrichment program enrichment program was obliterated by last summers airstrike. Correct? Gabbard: Yes… Ossoff: Last night, you stated there’s been no effort since then to rebuild their enrichment capability, correct? Gabbard: That’s right.. Ossoff: The WH says this new war was launched to eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by Iran. —— “Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: The IC determined that Iran maintained the intention to rebuild and grow their nuclear enrichment capabilities. ——The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: False…

MJTruthUltra

440,571 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard asserted that it is not the responsibility of US spy agencies to determine ‘what is and is not an imminent threat’ to the United States

US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard asserted that it is not the responsibility of US spy agencies to determine ‘what is and is not an imminent threat’ to the United States

Reuters

146,888 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Absolutely wild statement from Tulsi Gabbard, the U.S. Director of National Intelligence 👇 “It is not the intelligence communities responsibility to determine what is and isn’t an imminent threat.”

Absolutely wild statement from Tulsi Gabbard, the U.S. Director of National Intelligence 👇 “It is not the intelligence communities responsibility to determine what is and isn’t an imminent threat.”

Samira Mohyeddin سمیرا

357,696 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard says it’s not her job to determine what constitutes an imminent threat to the U.S. That’s a core responsibility of the role.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard says it’s not her job to determine what constitutes an imminent threat to the U.S. That’s a core responsibility of the role.

WarMonitor

37,616 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: DNI TULSI GABBARD GOES FULL PRO-TRUMP — DROPS A MASSIVE TRUTH BOMB! “The ONLY person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the PRESIDENT!”

🚨 BREAKING: DNI TULSI GABBARD GOES FULL PRO-TRUMP — DROPS A MASSIVE TRUTH BOMB! “The ONLY person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the PRESIDENT!”

Gunther Eagleman™

170,796 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Bera: There is no imminent threat of nuclear breakout. Did you deliver that assessment to the president? Gabbard: I have delivered the intelligence community’s assessment to the president.

Bera: There is no imminent threat of nuclear breakout. Did you deliver that assessment to the president? Gabbard: I have delivered the intelligence community’s assessment to the president.

Acyn

26,365 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

MacCallum: The president has the right to take military action for 60 days. Crow: If there is an imminent threat and there is no imminent threat. MacCallum: That might be your opinion. Crow: I sit on the armed services and intelligence committees and if there are imminent threats they have the obligation to tell us about it. I have seen no imminent threat

MacCallum: The president has the right to take military action for 60 days. Crow: If there is an imminent threat and there is no imminent threat. MacCallum: That might be your opinion. Crow: I sit on the armed services and intelligence committees and if there are imminent threats they have the obligation to tell us about it. I have seen no imminent threat

Acyn

1,265,441 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

OSSOFF: was there an imminent threat yes or no TULSI: the president decides that OSSOFF: no that’s literally your job

OSSOFF: was there an imminent threat yes or no TULSI: the president decides that OSSOFF: no that’s literally your job

Adam Mockler

18,574 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: McCallum: "The president has the right to take military action for 60 days." Crow: "If there's an imminent threat? And if there isn't an imminent threat?" McCallum: "That may be your opinion." Crow: "I'm on the Armed Services and Intelligence Committees. If there were imminent threats, they'd have to tell us. I haven't seen any imminent threat."

🚨 BREAKING: McCallum: "The president has the right to take military action for 60 days." Crow: "If there's an imminent threat? And if there isn't an imminent threat?" McCallum: "That may be your opinion." Crow: "I'm on the Armed Services and Intelligence Committees. If there were imminent threats, they'd have to tell us. I haven't seen any imminent threat."

GBC

32,393 просмотров • 15 дней назад

US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has been accused of altering her Senate testimony on Iran, omitting details that contradict President Trump’s claim that the country posed an imminent threat.

US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has been accused of altering her Senate testimony on Iran, omitting details that contradict President Trump’s claim that the country posed an imminent threat.

Al Jazeera Breaking News

117,246 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Rand Paul: "Really, the debate now should be, is a 47 year old conflict an imminent threat? Were there changes in their nuclear program that made this an imminent threat? And I don't think the evidence is there that this was an imminent threat that would allow the president to go to war on his own."

Rand Paul: "Really, the debate now should be, is a 47 year old conflict an imminent threat? Were there changes in their nuclear program that made this an imminent threat? And I don't think the evidence is there that this was an imminent threat that would allow the president to go to war on his own."

Aaron Rupar

228,697 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Q: "In March, the ODNI released their threat assessment concluding Iran is not building a nuclear weapon...What new intelligence does the U.S. have since then?" Hegseth: "The president has made it very clear, he's looked at all of this, all of the intelligence, all of the information, and come to the conclusion that the Iranian nuclear program is a threat and was willing to take this precision. operation to neutralize that threat in order to advance American national interests."

Q: "In March, the ODNI released their threat assessment concluding Iran is not building a nuclear weapon...What new intelligence does the U.S. have since then?" Hegseth: "The president has made it very clear, he's looked at all of this, all of the intelligence, all of the information, and come to the conclusion that the Iranian nuclear program is a threat and was willing to take this precision. operation to neutralize that threat in order to advance American national interests."

The Bulwark

40,809 просмотров • 1 год назад

Ossoff: So the assessment of the intelligence community is that Iran's nuclear enrichment program was obliterated by last summer's airstrikes? Gabbard: Yes. Ossoff: Your statement stated: there has been no efforts since then to try to rebuild their enrichment capability. That's the assessment of the intelligence community? Gabbard: Yes.

Ossoff: So the assessment of the intelligence community is that Iran's nuclear enrichment program was obliterated by last summer's airstrikes? Gabbard: Yes. Ossoff: Your statement stated: there has been no efforts since then to try to rebuild their enrichment capability. That's the assessment of the intelligence community? Gabbard: Yes.

Acyn

455,976 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) says he stands by the 2025 Annual Threat Assessment by U.S. intelligence leaders who testified at the time that Iran had not reauthorized their nuclear weapons program. “There was no imminent threat to the United States, and I don't believe there was even an imminent threat to Israel from Iran,” he tells Margaret Brennan. “Over a period of time, particularly with the ballistic missile capability, Israel would be more under threat. The decision to go to war in this case was a choice by President Trump.”

Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) says he stands by the 2025 Annual Threat Assessment by U.S. intelligence leaders who testified at the time that Iran had not reauthorized their nuclear weapons program. “There was no imminent threat to the United States, and I don't believe there was even an imminent threat to Israel from Iran,” he tells Margaret Brennan. “Over a period of time, particularly with the ballistic missile capability, Israel would be more under threat. The decision to go to war in this case was a choice by President Trump.”

Face The Nation

24,873 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

CRUZ: “I urged President Trump on Friday, I said, this regime is teetering. It is hanging by a thread. Do not miss this opportunity…” BASH: “That's different from what the president said and what the administration is saying, which is that there was an imminent threat from Iran.”

CRUZ: “I urged President Trump on Friday, I said, this regime is teetering. It is hanging by a thread. Do not miss this opportunity…” BASH: “That's different from what the president said and what the administration is saying, which is that there was an imminent threat from Iran.”

State of the Union

28,887 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад