Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

BREAKING: The SEC just said crypto rules are coming with or without Congress. Chair Atkins on CNBC. "Ready, willing and able" to write market structure rules itself. Days after the Senate shelved the CLARITY Act until after recess. Passage odds dropped to 27%. Down from 82% in February. Here's...

CryptoTice_'s profile picture

Crypto Tice

329,901 subscribers

22,078 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikFinanzen
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

SEC Chair: Will issue crypto market rules if the Clarity Act fails to pass On July 27, 2026, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins Paul Atkins discussed the Clarity Act and the regulation of the U.S. crypto market structure during a CNBC interview. He stated that he is optimistic about Congress passing the bill, with the SEC actively assisting by answering questions and providing technical support. If Congress ultimately fails to act, the SEC is ready, willing, and able to issue rules to address the issues involved in the Clarity Act and improve regulation in other areas of the crypto market. However, Atkins believed that SEC rulemaking cannot replace congressional legislation. The crypto market ultimately still needs a statute to provide more lasting certainty and establish clear safeguards for future regulatory direction and market development.
0:58

SEC Chair: Will issue crypto market rules if the Clarity Act fails to pass On July 27, 2026, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins Paul Atkins discussed the Clarity Act and the regulation of the U.S. crypto market structure during a CNBC interview. He stated that he is optimistic about Congress passing the bill, with the SEC actively assisting by answering questions and providing technical support. If Congress ultimately fails to act, the SEC is ready, willing, and able to issue rules to address the issues involved in the Clarity Act and improve regulation in other areas of the crypto market. However, Atkins believed that SEC rulemaking cannot replace congressional legislation. The crypto market ultimately still needs a statute to provide more lasting certainty and establish clear safeguards for future regulatory direction and market development.

Wu Blockchain

18,081 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

🇺🇸ATKINS: “I’M OPTIMISTIC THAT CONGRESS WILL PASS THE CLARITY ACT” SEC Chair Paul Atkins says the agency is ready to help implement the bill and answer lawmakers’ technical questions. While the SEC can issue rules on its own, Atkins says only legislation can truly “future-proof” crypto market structure and provide lasting clarity.
1:14

🇺🇸ATKINS: “I’M OPTIMISTIC THAT CONGRESS WILL PASS THE CLARITY ACT” SEC Chair Paul Atkins says the agency is ready to help implement the bill and answer lawmakers’ technical questions. While the SEC can issue rules on its own, Atkins says only legislation can truly “future-proof” crypto market structure and provide lasting clarity.

CryptosRus

11,719 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 SEC Chair Paul Atkins urges Congress to pass the Bitcoin & crypto market structure legislation. "It's really crucial for Congress at this moment in time to step forward and come up with legislation that can guide us."
1:53

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 SEC Chair Paul Atkins urges Congress to pass the Bitcoin & crypto market structure legislation. "It's really crucial for Congress at this moment in time to step forward and come up with legislation that can guide us."

Bitcoin Magazine

85,923 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

16 legislative days. that's all that's left before August recess ⏳ the CLARITY Act either gets done now or waits months. and Selig just said the goal is to cement crypto rules in statute so no future administration can tear them apart 👀 the clock is the story now $XRP
1:28

16 legislative days. that's all that's left before August recess ⏳ the CLARITY Act either gets done now or waits months. and Selig just said the goal is to cement crypto rules in statute so no future administration can tear them apart 👀 the clock is the story now $XRP

𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸XRP

42,489 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

While Congress debates Clarity, the SEC just went ahead and wrote a rule "Congress has spent years now debating crypto Clarity. So the SEC did something really crazy and radical, they decided to actually write a rule. So maybe we're in an environment now where the legislative process is becoming a little less important" "The regulators, who we know will still be here for the next few years regardless of what happens in midterm elections, can make rules that make sense" "And if those rules are made, and the industry becomes too big to fail and actually launches things that are important and of use, maybe they will not be reversed by the next regime"
0:38

While Congress debates Clarity, the SEC just went ahead and wrote a rule "Congress has spent years now debating crypto Clarity. So the SEC did something really crazy and radical, they decided to actually write a rule. So maybe we're in an environment now where the legislative process is becoming a little less important" "The regulators, who we know will still be here for the next few years regardless of what happens in midterm elections, can make rules that make sense" "And if those rules are made, and the industry becomes too big to fail and actually launches things that are important and of use, maybe they will not be reversed by the next regime"

The Wolf Of All Streets

38,538 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

The LAST CHANCE for crypto clarity starts THIS FRIDAY. House field hearing in NYC, July 17: "How the CLARITY Act Unlocks Innovation." - Congress leaves for recess August 7. That's ~4 weeks to schedule, debate, and pass. - Senator Lummis, crypto's strongest advocate in the Senate, is not seeking re-election. If this slips to the 120th Congress, the entire coalition resets. - Galaxy's Alex Thorn: "If we don't pass clarity into law, innovation will continue abroad, and America will be left behind." The silver lining we have is that the pro-crypto SEC is already moving on exchange and broker-dealer rules for 2026...with or without Congress.
9:02

The LAST CHANCE for crypto clarity starts THIS FRIDAY. House field hearing in NYC, July 17: "How the CLARITY Act Unlocks Innovation." - Congress leaves for recess August 7. That's ~4 weeks to schedule, debate, and pass. - Senator Lummis, crypto's strongest advocate in the Senate, is not seeking re-election. If this slips to the 120th Congress, the entire coalition resets. - Galaxy's Alex Thorn: "If we don't pass clarity into law, innovation will continue abroad, and America will be left behind." The silver lining we have is that the pro-crypto SEC is already moving on exchange and broker-dealer rules for 2026...with or without Congress.

Dan Gambardello

25,034 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 The CLARITY Act text just dropped! For the first time in 250 years, a president agreed to an ethics provision restricting his own conduct. Trump, banned from issuing or sponsoring digital assets for profit. 15 days to pass it before recess. After that, elections, new Congress, & the bill's lead proponent is gone.
7:37

🚨 The CLARITY Act text just dropped! For the first time in 250 years, a president agreed to an ethics provision restricting his own conduct. Trump, banned from issuing or sponsoring digital assets for profit. 15 days to pass it before recess. After that, elections, new Congress, & the bill's lead proponent is gone.

Dan Gambardello

73,766 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨NEW: This week we sat down with Dan Gallagher, Chief Legal Officer at Robinhood, to discuss his path from SEC Commissioner to leading legal at the retail trading platform now in the S&P 500. We get into: • The meme stock frenzy • The future of tokenization + DeFi • Friendship with SEC Chair Paul Atkins • Market structure legislation • Why event contracts are the next big thing And, yes, we asked: could an SEC Chairmanship be in his future? 👀 TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 - Welcome Dan Gallagher To Crypto In America 0:30 - What Does Crypto In America Mean To Dan? 01:38 - The Meme Stock Craze and Robinhood's Response 04:51 - Crypto's Role in Robinhood's Growth 11:12 - Navigating Under SEC Chair Gensler, Low Points in Crypto 19:40 - Working With Paul Atkins 22:03 - Tokenization and the Future of Trading 32:21 - Liquitidy & 24/7 Trading Under Tokenization 42:37 - Market Structure Legislation 46:33 - Competitor Products (Coinbase's Base, Stripe L1) 49:00 - Approaching Gray Areas In The Legal Framework 54:00 - SEC Chair Gallagher In The Future? 55:30 - What Dan Is Watching Currenty - Event Contracts Coming to Robinhood 58:24 - Thanks Dan For Joining!
58:36

🚨NEW: This week we sat down with Dan Gallagher, Chief Legal Officer at Robinhood, to discuss his path from SEC Commissioner to leading legal at the retail trading platform now in the S&P 500. We get into: • The meme stock frenzy • The future of tokenization + DeFi • Friendship with SEC Chair Paul Atkins • Market structure legislation • Why event contracts are the next big thing And, yes, we asked: could an SEC Chairmanship be in his future? 👀 TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 - Welcome Dan Gallagher To Crypto In America 0:30 - What Does Crypto In America Mean To Dan? 01:38 - The Meme Stock Craze and Robinhood's Response 04:51 - Crypto's Role in Robinhood's Growth 11:12 - Navigating Under SEC Chair Gensler, Low Points in Crypto 19:40 - Working With Paul Atkins 22:03 - Tokenization and the Future of Trading 32:21 - Liquitidy & 24/7 Trading Under Tokenization 42:37 - Market Structure Legislation 46:33 - Competitor Products (Coinbase's Base, Stripe L1) 49:00 - Approaching Gray Areas In The Legal Framework 54:00 - SEC Chair Gallagher In The Future? 55:30 - What Dan Is Watching Currenty - Event Contracts Coming to Robinhood 58:24 - Thanks Dan For Joining!

Crypto In America

20,139 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Bloomberg says the SEC has major crypto plans coming. Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan on what they actually are, and why they're bigger than people think: "This is the bypass road on the CLARITY Act." "CLARITY is legislation, slow. The SEC can act through regulation. In about a week, we expect the first draft of the Reg Crypto rules." "They're intended to let new projects raise capital without triggering SEC registration, then evolve into a centralized platform." "That's a dream we've had since 2018 and the ICO boom, but now with regulatory teeth and certainty." "People are dramatically underestimating the entrepreneurial energy this creates."
2:20

Bloomberg says the SEC has major crypto plans coming. Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan on what they actually are, and why they're bigger than people think: "This is the bypass road on the CLARITY Act." "CLARITY is legislation, slow. The SEC can act through regulation. In about a week, we expect the first draft of the Reg Crypto rules." "They're intended to let new projects raise capital without triggering SEC registration, then evolve into a centralized platform." "That's a dream we've had since 2018 and the ICO boom, but now with regulatory teeth and certainty." "People are dramatically underestimating the entrepreneurial energy this creates."

The Rollup

93,815 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna reveals the two rules every new member of Congress is handed the week they arrive, and Stephen A. Smith can hardly believe what he’s hearing. LUNA: "Every Congress, every two years, the House will come together and kind of come up with the rules of the game." "A lot of members of Congress don't learn that when you first get elected, they just kind of bring you up here and they tell you two things: Never vote against the party and never take down a rule." SMITH: "They actually say that?! Hold on, hold on, Representative. They actually say to you? 'Never vote against the party.' They actually say that to you?!" LUNA: "Yeah, but it's not just us. The Democrats do it too, which is why you see the inner-party fighting. I'd say that Congress is more like a parliament than anything." "And then they'll tell you, 'Don't use the rules and techniques that you're given, because then you're not going back to normal order. We need to make sure that normal order is given.'" "Well, that just means that they want you to shut up and color."
0:57

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna reveals the two rules every new member of Congress is handed the week they arrive, and Stephen A. Smith can hardly believe what he’s hearing. LUNA: "Every Congress, every two years, the House will come together and kind of come up with the rules of the game." "A lot of members of Congress don't learn that when you first get elected, they just kind of bring you up here and they tell you two things: Never vote against the party and never take down a rule." SMITH: "They actually say that?! Hold on, hold on, Representative. They actually say to you? 'Never vote against the party.' They actually say that to you?!" LUNA: "Yeah, but it's not just us. The Democrats do it too, which is why you see the inner-party fighting. I'd say that Congress is more like a parliament than anything." "And then they'll tell you, 'Don't use the rules and techniques that you're given, because then you're not going back to normal order. We need to make sure that normal order is given.'" "Well, that just means that they want you to shut up and color."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

674,847 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 CLARITY ACT NEWS UPDATE: THE PRESSURE IS MOVING FROM TALK TO IMPLEMENTATION. 🚨 The White House just pushed back on claims that it is blocking Democratic seats at the SEC and CFTC, saying it asked for names and has not received them. Why does this matter for $XRP? Because CLARITY is not only about passing a bill. It is about having regulators ready to enforce the new rulebook after it passes. The SEC and CFTC are the referees. If digital assets finally get clear lanes, those agencies need people in the seats to define securities, commodities, and market rules. That is why this fight matters. Washington is no longer debating whether crypto exists. They are debating who runs the system once the rules arrive. For XRP holders, that is the shift. A real framework means institutions can stop guessing and start building around settlement, liquidity and tokenized value.
0:33

🚨 CLARITY ACT NEWS UPDATE: THE PRESSURE IS MOVING FROM TALK TO IMPLEMENTATION. 🚨 The White House just pushed back on claims that it is blocking Democratic seats at the SEC and CFTC, saying it asked for names and has not received them. Why does this matter for $XRP? Because CLARITY is not only about passing a bill. It is about having regulators ready to enforce the new rulebook after it passes. The SEC and CFTC are the referees. If digital assets finally get clear lanes, those agencies need people in the seats to define securities, commodities, and market rules. That is why this fight matters. Washington is no longer debating whether crypto exists. They are debating who runs the system once the rules arrive. For XRP holders, that is the shift. A real framework means institutions can stop guessing and start building around settlement, liquidity and tokenized value.

X Finance Bull

44,710 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

WATCH: Congressman Andy Barr questions Paul Atkins on the CLARITY Act's impact on market innovation, to which he answers: “Well, as you know, the President has set out the challenge that the U.S. should be the crypto capital of the world. And I feel strongly that we can and should do that and achieve it. So to do that, we have to have a framework that makes sense, that is fit for purpose. Unfortunately, traditional rules that the SEC has, you know, are not really fit for purpose here and have created a lot of uncertainty in the marketplace. Thus the CLARITY Act, and thus the true importance of the SEC, to work very much hand in glove with the CFTC in order that there be no gaps in the oversight, but that also innovators have surety as to what they're doing.” 📺⬇️
5:00

WATCH: Congressman Andy Barr questions Paul Atkins on the CLARITY Act's impact on market innovation, to which he answers: “Well, as you know, the President has set out the challenge that the U.S. should be the crypto capital of the world. And I feel strongly that we can and should do that and achieve it. So to do that, we have to have a framework that makes sense, that is fit for purpose. Unfortunately, traditional rules that the SEC has, you know, are not really fit for purpose here and have created a lot of uncertainty in the marketplace. Thus the CLARITY Act, and thus the true importance of the SEC, to work very much hand in glove with the CFTC in order that there be no gaps in the oversight, but that also innovators have surety as to what they're doing.” 📺⬇️

Financial Services GOP

16,788 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 WARNING: SOMETHING EXTREMELY BAD IS HAPPENING!! Odds of the CLARITY Act passing this year just CRASHED: 90% → 23% Last time this happened, Bitcoin crashed: $97K → $61K (-38%) Now the SEC is already preparing its OWN crypto rules while Congress still can’t get the bill passed. That tells you everything. Trump can keep trying to pump crypto with bullish words. But that does NOT change the situation. I don’t expect the CLARITY Act to pass this year. And if $BTC pumps again on Trump headlines, I’m calling it a BULL TRAP. I don’t think the real dump has even started yet. You were warned. Follow and turn notifications on. When I start buying Bitcoin again, I’ll post it here publicly.
0:20

🚨 WARNING: SOMETHING EXTREMELY BAD IS HAPPENING!! Odds of the CLARITY Act passing this year just CRASHED: 90% → 23% Last time this happened, Bitcoin crashed: $97K → $61K (-38%) Now the SEC is already preparing its OWN crypto rules while Congress still can’t get the bill passed. That tells you everything. Trump can keep trying to pump crypto with bullish words. But that does NOT change the situation. I don’t expect the CLARITY Act to pass this year. And if $BTC pumps again on Trump headlines, I’m calling it a BULL TRAP. I don’t think the real dump has even started yet. You were warned. Follow and turn notifications on. When I start buying Bitcoin again, I’ll post it here publicly.

Wimar.X

81,412 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

🇺🇸 The CLARITY Act could become one of the most important crypto bills EVER. Not because it’s pro-crypto. But because it creates a framework institutions can actually work with. The biggest shift: Crypto would not be treated like a regulatory experiment anymore. Instead, it would be treated like financial infrastructure. That changes the game for: • exchanges • stablecoins • tokenization • institutional adoption The market isn’t reacting to headlines. It’s reacting to the fact that the US is building actual rules around crypto. And now that the bill is advancing through Congress, the next crypto cycle could look VERY DIFFERENT from the last one.
0:25

🇺🇸 The CLARITY Act could become one of the most important crypto bills EVER. Not because it’s pro-crypto. But because it creates a framework institutions can actually work with. The biggest shift: Crypto would not be treated like a regulatory experiment anymore. Instead, it would be treated like financial infrastructure. That changes the game for: • exchanges • stablecoins • tokenization • institutional adoption The market isn’t reacting to headlines. It’s reacting to the fact that the US is building actual rules around crypto. And now that the bill is advancing through Congress, the next crypto cycle could look VERY DIFFERENT from the last one.

CryptoGoos

39,564 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

David Sacks: Crypto Legislation to Expect in 2025 On E214, David Sacks broke down two crypto bills we could see over the next few months: 1) Stablecoin Framework -- Senator Bill Hagerty introduced a stablecoin bill last week -- bill aims to be "safe" and "pro-growth" -- goals include "enhancing transaction efficiency" and "driving demand for US Treasuries" -- prohibits algorithmic stablecoins -- requires 1-to-1 reserves and AML compliance 2) Market Structure -- digital assets can be many things -- currencies, commodities, securities, collectibles, etc. -- "And one of the things that the market needs is just clarity around the definitions, so that founders know what the rules of the road are, and they can actually just comply with them." Sacks added that this is the first time that all chairmen of the four key committees that govern crypto are aligned in supporting pro-crypto legislation. They include: -- Tim Scott (Chair, Senate Banking Committee) -- French Hill (Chair, House Financial Services Committee) -- John Boozman (Chair, Senate Ag Committee) -- GT Thompson (Chair, House Ag Committee) "What the four chairmen indicated is actually they're going to take up stablecoins first and then market structure will follow very quickly." "So I think there's a pretty good chance we can get this done in the next six months."
1:03

David Sacks: Crypto Legislation to Expect in 2025 On E214, David Sacks broke down two crypto bills we could see over the next few months: 1) Stablecoin Framework -- Senator Bill Hagerty introduced a stablecoin bill last week -- bill aims to be "safe" and "pro-growth" -- goals include "enhancing transaction efficiency" and "driving demand for US Treasuries" -- prohibits algorithmic stablecoins -- requires 1-to-1 reserves and AML compliance 2) Market Structure -- digital assets can be many things -- currencies, commodities, securities, collectibles, etc. -- "And one of the things that the market needs is just clarity around the definitions, so that founders know what the rules of the road are, and they can actually just comply with them." Sacks added that this is the first time that all chairmen of the four key committees that govern crypto are aligned in supporting pro-crypto legislation. They include: -- Tim Scott (Chair, Senate Banking Committee) -- French Hill (Chair, House Financial Services Committee) -- John Boozman (Chair, Senate Ag Committee) -- GT Thompson (Chair, House Ag Committee) "What the four chairmen indicated is actually they're going to take up stablecoins first and then market structure will follow very quickly." "So I think there's a pretty good chance we can get this done in the next six months."

The All-In Podcast

132,710 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨🇺🇸🇻🇪 "THE U.S. JUST BROKE ITS OWN RULES BY KIDNAPPING A FOREIGN LEADER" The U.S. just captured Maduro in a covert military strike, and Alex Christoforou is calling out the hypocrisy. Washington constantly lectures the world about “rules-based order” and “international law,” but just kidnapped a sitting head of state. Alex points out how the U.S. would react if the roles were reversed, say, if drones targeted a Western leader. According to him there are no rules when it comes to American power. Not anymore. "The United States always lectures everybody about international law and the rules-based order. Well, you just went into a country and you kidnapped the internationally recognized leader of that country. You can't go after leaders, right? Isn't that what we've been told? There are certain rules to war or to conflict. And there are certain international rules. You just can't go in there and grab the leader of another country. But we're dealing with the United States, and so, you know, there are no rules." Alex Christoforou
0:59

🚨🇺🇸🇻🇪 "THE U.S. JUST BROKE ITS OWN RULES BY KIDNAPPING A FOREIGN LEADER" The U.S. just captured Maduro in a covert military strike, and Alex Christoforou is calling out the hypocrisy. Washington constantly lectures the world about “rules-based order” and “international law,” but just kidnapped a sitting head of state. Alex points out how the U.S. would react if the roles were reversed, say, if drones targeted a Western leader. According to him there are no rules when it comes to American power. Not anymore. "The United States always lectures everybody about international law and the rules-based order. Well, you just went into a country and you kidnapped the internationally recognized leader of that country. You can't go after leaders, right? Isn't that what we've been told? There are certain rules to war or to conflict. And there are certain international rules. You just can't go in there and grab the leader of another country. But we're dealing with the United States, and so, you know, there are no rules." Alex Christoforou

Mario Nawfal

82,233 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: Sen. Mike Lee just demanded the Senate GOP NUKE the filibuster if we don't enforce the talking filibuster — go for gold, and PASS SAVE AMERICA Or we might LOSE the midterms. "We have exactly two options. We can either one start enforcing our rules as they're written and require filibustering senators to speak and exhaust them and stay on a bill that is critical to our agenda until it passes..." "...or if we're not willing to do that because that involves hard work, we have to NUKE THE FILUBUSTER, NOW!" "I would strongly prefer the first. I think it's better to do it with the rules that we've got because the rules that we've got actually ensure and protect robust debate." "But what, we can't have is this hybrid? We can't try to walk a middle ground between those two saying yeah, we're gonna stick with the filibuster with the 60 vote cloture standard and then not do the work to get to cloture? "That is a problem. So we've got a choice to make — if we don't make one of those two choices, use the talking filibuster or nuke the filibuster, we're gonna be in BIG trouble in November."
0:58

🚨 BREAKING: Sen. Mike Lee just demanded the Senate GOP NUKE the filibuster if we don't enforce the talking filibuster — go for gold, and PASS SAVE AMERICA Or we might LOSE the midterms. "We have exactly two options. We can either one start enforcing our rules as they're written and require filibustering senators to speak and exhaust them and stay on a bill that is critical to our agenda until it passes..." "...or if we're not willing to do that because that involves hard work, we have to NUKE THE FILUBUSTER, NOW!" "I would strongly prefer the first. I think it's better to do it with the rules that we've got because the rules that we've got actually ensure and protect robust debate." "But what, we can't have is this hybrid? We can't try to walk a middle ground between those two saying yeah, we're gonna stick with the filibuster with the 60 vote cloture standard and then not do the work to get to cloture? "That is a problem. So we've got a choice to make — if we don't make one of those two choices, use the talking filibuster or nuke the filibuster, we're gonna be in BIG trouble in November."

Eric Daugherty

57,805 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🇺🇸 THE MYSTERIOUS FILIBUSTER! - As much as we talk about the filibuster, few people actually understand it. Under filibuster rules you don't need 60 votes to pass legislation. You need 60 votes to get to cloture, which means you can then vote on the legislation. Right now with the SAVE America Act we have 51 votes. We have enough votes to pass the legislation but we can't get to cloture because we can't get enough Democrats to cross the aisle to get to 60 votes. Of course Democrats don't want election integrity. We talk about the nuclear option, thinking that this means the Senate will vote to end the filibuster rule. That's not what it means. Actually achieving cloture to vote to end the filibuster rule would require a two-thirds Senate vote. And that's impossible. What is possible is when you bring up the SAVE America Act for a cloture vote and you only get 51 out of the 60 required, a senator can then raise a point of order saying that "cloture on this bill should only need a simple majority." The chair would rule against him, backed up by the parliamentarian. That senator can then appeal and the question becomes, "shall the decision of the chair stand?" The Senate then votes on that appeal and if 51 senators vote to overrule the chair then the vote on the SAVE America Act can take place. Yes this is a tortured way of doing things but that's "the nuclear option." Harry Reid did it in 2013 on federal judges and Mitch McConnell did it in 2017 on Supreme Court judges. But again the problem we have now is: do we have enough Senators to get to 51 to do the nuclear option? According to John Thune we don't. Thoughts? ⬇️
0:23

🇺🇸 THE MYSTERIOUS FILIBUSTER! - As much as we talk about the filibuster, few people actually understand it. Under filibuster rules you don't need 60 votes to pass legislation. You need 60 votes to get to cloture, which means you can then vote on the legislation. Right now with the SAVE America Act we have 51 votes. We have enough votes to pass the legislation but we can't get to cloture because we can't get enough Democrats to cross the aisle to get to 60 votes. Of course Democrats don't want election integrity. We talk about the nuclear option, thinking that this means the Senate will vote to end the filibuster rule. That's not what it means. Actually achieving cloture to vote to end the filibuster rule would require a two-thirds Senate vote. And that's impossible. What is possible is when you bring up the SAVE America Act for a cloture vote and you only get 51 out of the 60 required, a senator can then raise a point of order saying that "cloture on this bill should only need a simple majority." The chair would rule against him, backed up by the parliamentarian. That senator can then appeal and the question becomes, "shall the decision of the chair stand?" The Senate then votes on that appeal and if 51 senators vote to overrule the chair then the vote on the SAVE America Act can take place. Yes this is a tortured way of doing things but that's "the nuclear option." Harry Reid did it in 2013 on federal judges and Mitch McConnell did it in 2017 on Supreme Court judges. But again the problem we have now is: do we have enough Senators to get to 51 to do the nuclear option? According to John Thune we don't. Thoughts? ⬇️

Bill Mitchell

17,413 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

LIVE NOW -- Ethereum is Under Attack ⚠️ Joseph Lubin and Matt Corva on the SEC vs Ethereum The SEC is going after K, Coinbase 🛡️, Uniswap and MetaMask 🦊. They’re trying to turn every non-custodial wallet into a broker-dealer. But here’s what’s new - Joe and Matt are producing evidence that the SEC is coming after Ethereum itself. Sending discovery requests to Ethereum core developers, threatening their employers - pushing a coordinated effort to claim Ether is a security so they can control it. “The US is trying to disconnect from Ethereum" that’s what Joe Lubin the CEO of Consensys said in today’s conversation. He was talking about those in power trying to uplug Ethereum from the citizens. The evidence increasingly seems to back this statement. So Consensys is taking them to court. 0:00 Intro 6:35 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission vs. Ethereum 9:45 The Uniqueness of This Case 11:15 88,000 Pages to the SEC 12:11 SEC Going After Devs? 14:47 The Wells Notice 16:27 ETH ETF 17:58 Outcome of Consensys.eth Winning 21:29 U.S. Law Process & Timeline 25:55 Ether Isn’t a Security 34:50 Gary Gensler's Confidence Conspiracy 41:17 MetaMask Isn’t a Broker Dealer 47:10 What is Prometheum? 51:10 How Can the SEC Win? What Happens to Crypto? 55:49 What the Crypto Community Can Do 59:50 What Happens Next? 1:03:15 Closing & Disclaimers
1:05:16

LIVE NOW -- Ethereum is Under Attack ⚠️ Joseph Lubin and Matt Corva on the SEC vs Ethereum The SEC is going after K, Coinbase 🛡️, Uniswap and MetaMask 🦊. They’re trying to turn every non-custodial wallet into a broker-dealer. But here’s what’s new - Joe and Matt are producing evidence that the SEC is coming after Ethereum itself. Sending discovery requests to Ethereum core developers, threatening their employers - pushing a coordinated effort to claim Ether is a security so they can control it. “The US is trying to disconnect from Ethereum" that’s what Joe Lubin the CEO of Consensys said in today’s conversation. He was talking about those in power trying to uplug Ethereum from the citizens. The evidence increasingly seems to back this statement. So Consensys is taking them to court. 0:00 Intro 6:35 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission vs. Ethereum 9:45 The Uniqueness of This Case 11:15 88,000 Pages to the SEC 12:11 SEC Going After Devs? 14:47 The Wells Notice 16:27 ETH ETF 17:58 Outcome of Consensys.eth Winning 21:29 U.S. Law Process & Timeline 25:55 Ether Isn’t a Security 34:50 Gary Gensler's Confidence Conspiracy 41:17 MetaMask Isn’t a Broker Dealer 47:10 What is Prometheum? 51:10 How Can the SEC Win? What Happens to Crypto? 55:49 What the Crypto Community Can Do 59:50 What Happens Next? 1:03:15 Closing & Disclaimers

Bankless

344,332 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren