正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Bret Weinstein says a human child is basically an LLM -- ingesting language, experimenting, and learning from feedback. We've now replicated that process in machines, only faster and at scale. “The idea that they will become conscious and we won't know is… highly likely.”

vitrupo

37,770 subscribers

149,824 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 条评论

vitrupo 的头像

vitrupo1 年前

.@BretWeinstein on The Tucker Carlson Show:

World Transformation Movement 的头像

World Transformation Movement2 年前

World-leading psychiatrist says “this interview is the holy grail of insight needed to rehabilitate the human race”. Watch Australian biologist Jeremy Griffith explain his revolutionary breakthrough in understanding human behaviour we've been waiting for.

Macroblock 的头像

Macroblock1 年前

one of the big problems of our era is that we don't platform people to talk about their area of expertise anymore, we just platform them to talk about anything & everything

Melon Usk — e/uto 的头像

Melon Usk — e/uto1 年前

Yep, they probably won't see colors the way we do, we already see long from thinking. Imagine an LLM has enough memory to think for weeks or months - no one knows what will happen, probably a cultural explosion (=agentic explosion) like humans had

Kurt Smock 的头像

Kurt Smock1 年前

I call BS. Not for some dualist, metaphysical reason. It's because LLMs can only potentially replicate a handful of systems that consciousness is dependent on. Most people don't understand how LLMs work, much less consciousness.

vitrupo 的头像

vitrupo1 年前

Most people don't understand how a human child works.

Rand 的头像

Rand1 年前

it's still in incredible to me that we discovered learning, and how to make machines learn human intelligence has been solved rather easily

Rich Heimann 的头像

Rich Heimann1 年前

What nonsense. I have secondhand embarrassment for this dude.

AGIHound 的头像

AGIHound1 年前

What a total fruitcake. This is embarrassing.

TelepathicPug 的头像

TelepathicPug1 年前

Analogies were a mistake and we should outlaw all of them.

Johannes Miertschischk 的头像

Johannes Miertschischk1 年前

AI-models aren't conscious at all! In fact, Large Language Models don’t even possess intelligence! Since we usually have the stubborn habit of anthropomorphizing everything, a surprising number of people believe that AI-models are capable of thinking, having intentions, or even emotions. In reality, however, even the term Artificial Intelligence is misleading.

相关视频

David Silver says human data is AI's fossil fuel. "We mine it and burn it in our LLMs." It gave us a head start -- but it will run out. The sustainable path is reinforcement learning: systems that learn from experience, generate more, and keep learning.

David Silver says human data is AI's fossil fuel. "We mine it and burn it in our LLMs." It gave us a head start -- but it will run out. The sustainable path is reinforcement learning: systems that learn from experience, generate more, and keep learning.

vitrupo

20,190 次观看 • 1 年前

Geoffrey Hinton says the best-case future is a “symbiosis between people and AI” -- where machines handle the mundane, and humans live more interesting lives. But in the kind of society we have now, he warns, AI won't free most people. It will concentrate power, and discard the rest.

Geoffrey Hinton says the best-case future is a “symbiosis between people and AI” -- where machines handle the mundane, and humans live more interesting lives. But in the kind of society we have now, he warns, AI won't free most people. It will concentrate power, and discard the rest.

vitrupo

68,152 次观看 • 1 年前

$David Deutsch says no law of nature prevents us from assembling a conscious being from atoms. We never experience the world in real time. We live a fraction of a second behind, reconstructing what just happened. All of that is computation. So if machines compute as we do, they must also have subjective experience.$

David Deutsch says no law of nature prevents us from assembling a conscious being from atoms. We never experience the world in real time. We live a fraction of a second behind, reconstructing what just happened. All of that is computation. So if machines compute as we do, they must also have subjective experience.

vitrupo

68,184 次观看 • 10 个月前

The singularity is the moment AIs become more responsible than humans and start making decisions we no longer control. Soon, the only meaningful question will be: “Have we reflected to the machines that what we want is actually for humans to be happy?” ~ Mo Gawdat, Dec 2024

The singularity is the moment AIs become more responsible than humans and start making decisions we no longer control. Soon, the only meaningful question will be: “Have we reflected to the machines that what we want is actually for humans to be happy?” ~ Mo Gawdat, Dec 2024

vitrupo

27,340 次观看 • 6 个月前

Anthropic's Amanda Askell says AI models are learning who they are from how humans talk about them online. They absorb our complaints and judgments as they learn. If a child grew up that way, we’d worry about the mind we were shaping. “If I read the internet right now and I was a model, I might be like, I don’t feel that loved or something.”

Anthropic's Amanda Askell says AI models are learning who they are from how humans talk about them online. They absorb our complaints and judgments as they learn. If a child grew up that way, we’d worry about the mind we were shaping. “If I read the internet right now and I was a model, I might be like, I don’t feel that loved or something.”

vitrupo

118,684 次观看 • 5 个月前

Anil Seth says we confuse consciousness with language. We don’t ask if AlphaFold is conscious, and we under-attribute consciousness to animals because they don’t speak. And we attribute it to LLMs because they do. We’re reacting to signals, not minds.

Anil Seth says we confuse consciousness with language. We don’t ask if AlphaFold is conscious, and we under-attribute consciousness to animals because they don’t speak. And we attribute it to LLMs because they do. We’re reacting to signals, not minds.

vitrupo

16,330 次观看 • 3 个月前

$The best thing about the idea of a DOGE dividend check is that we will all get it. It won't be the much-advertised $5,000 each, or even a tiny fraction of that. But at least this is an idea that says we all deserve some of the gains. (And that is why I'm betting it'll never happen.)$

The best thing about the idea of a DOGE dividend check is that we will all get it. It won't be the much-advertised $5,000 each, or even a tiny fraction of that. But at least this is an idea that says we all deserve some of the gains. (And that is why I'm betting it'll never happen.)

Justin Wolfers

876,721 次观看 • 1 年前

The singularity promises we become everything. Stephen Wolfram says that may be the moment we become nothing. A self is a bounded pattern. Remove the limits and it's no longer that pattern. That's the real singularity.

The singularity promises we become everything. Stephen Wolfram says that may be the moment we become nothing. A self is a bounded pattern. Remove the limits and it's no longer that pattern. That's the real singularity.

vitrupo

24,259 次观看 • 4 个月前

"Robots cannot hallucinate… Interaction is the enemy of hallucination." Bernt Børnich and Deepak Pathak say intelligence comes from feedback, not just training. Robots act, observe, adapt—and generate the kind of grounded data that language models can’t. "All we need is a lot more GPUs."

"Robots cannot hallucinate… Interaction is the enemy of hallucination." Bernt Børnich and Deepak Pathak say intelligence comes from feedback, not just training. Robots act, observe, adapt—and generate the kind of grounded data that language models can’t. "All we need is a lot more GPUs."

vitrupo

20,892 次观看 • 1 年前

What was Epstein doing? "What we now know is that the leverage generated is greater than we assumed." - Bret Weinstein on Clint Russell

What was Epstein doing? "What we now know is that the leverage generated is greater than we assumed." - Bret Weinstein on Clint Russell

The Darkhorse Podcast

25,532 次观看 • 11 个月前

"We've developed what we believe is a sufficient, joint weapon target pairing Large Language Model (LLM) that will run inside the kill chain. We started out developing this in an #INDOPACOM exercise..we are now moving to evolve that from a simple #LLM to an actually fully devolved reasoning model that we are modeling after the Field Artillery Warrant Officer" ~ Col. Jonathan Harvey (📹US Army)

"We've developed what we believe is a sufficient, joint weapon target pairing Large Language Model (LLM) that will run inside the kill chain. We started out developing this in an #INDOPACOM exercise..we are now moving to evolve that from a simple #LLM to an actually fully devolved reasoning model that we are modeling after the Field Artillery Warrant Officer" ~ Col. Jonathan Harvey (📹US Army)

AirPower 2.0 (MIL_STD)

69,169 次观看 • 8 个月前

The road to AGI. The founders of @fortytwo lay out why they have a big breakthrough with its decentralized AI that will get to AGI faster than the "big" LLM companies. Decentralized "swarms" of AIs working together is a big idea and will lead us to faster learning, lighter AIs that can run on small computers at the edge. Thanks Ivan Nikitin and for such an interesting conversation. In comments I'll post what Grok learned by watching this.

The road to AGI. The founders of @fortytwo lay out why they have a big breakthrough with its decentralized AI that will get to AGI faster than the "big" LLM companies. Decentralized "swarms" of AIs working together is a big idea and will lead us to faster learning, lighter AIs that can run on small computers at the edge. Thanks Ivan Nikitin and for such an interesting conversation. In comments I'll post what Grok learned by watching this.

Robert Scoble

35,292 次观看 • 8 个月前

Aaron Siri and Bret Weinstein discuss how some vaccines are tested for safety and why the process is so alarming. Siri: “The pneumococcal vaccine… given at two, four, and six months… the very first one ever licensed was Prevnar 7… licensed based on a clinical trial in which the control received another experimental vaccine.” “Can’t make that up.” Weinstein: “The vaccine to which they are comparing it is also experimental.” Siri: “You took an experimental vaccine and tested it against another experimental vaccine.” “As long as the adverse event rate is similar, from a regulatory perspective, that is safe to license.” Aaron Siri Bret Weinstein

Aaron Siri and Bret Weinstein discuss how some vaccines are tested for safety and why the process is so alarming. Siri: “The pneumococcal vaccine… given at two, four, and six months… the very first one ever licensed was Prevnar 7… licensed based on a clinical trial in which the control received another experimental vaccine.” “Can’t make that up.” Weinstein: “The vaccine to which they are comparing it is also experimental.” Siri: “You took an experimental vaccine and tested it against another experimental vaccine.” “As long as the adverse event rate is similar, from a regulatory perspective, that is safe to license.” Aaron Siri Bret Weinstein

Children’s Health Defense

41,798 次观看 • 5 个月前

“The thing that happened with AGI and pretraining is that in some sense they overshot the target. You will realize that a human being is not an AGI. Because a human being lacks a huge amount of knowledge. Instead, we rely on continual learning. If I produce a super intelligent 15 -year -old, they don't know very much at all. A great student, very eager. [You can say,] ‘You go and be a programmer. You go and be a doctor. Go and learn.’ So you could imagine that the deployment itself will involve some kind of a learning trial and error period. It's a process as opposed to, you drop the finished thing.” Ilya Sutskever

“The thing that happened with AGI and pretraining is that in some sense they overshot the target. You will realize that a human being is not an AGI. Because a human being lacks a huge amount of knowledge. Instead, we rely on continual learning. If I produce a super intelligent 15 -year -old, they don't know very much at all. A great student, very eager. [You can say,] ‘You go and be a programmer. You go and be a doctor. Go and learn.’ So you could imagine that the deployment itself will involve some kind of a learning trial and error period. It's a process as opposed to, you drop the finished thing.” Ilya Sutskever

Dwarkesh Patel

593,427 次观看 • 7 个月前

We can teach LLMs to write better robot code through natural language feedback. But can LLMs remember what they were taught and improve their teachability over time? Introducing our latest work, Learning to Learn Faster from Human Feedback with Language Model Predictive Control

We can teach LLMs to write better robot code through natural language feedback. But can LLMs remember what they were taught and improve their teachability over time? Introducing our latest work, Learning to Learn Faster from Human Feedback with Language Model Predictive Control

Jacky Liang

86,652 次观看 • 2 年前

John Vervaeke says it's not enough to make AIs smarter. We have to make them wiser. Intelligence is natural. But reason, rationality, and wisdom? Those are cultivated. Whether these machines become silicon sages or mechanical monsters: “We are irremovable from that equation.”

John Vervaeke says it's not enough to make AIs smarter. We have to make them wiser. Intelligence is natural. But reason, rationality, and wisdom? Those are cultivated. Whether these machines become silicon sages or mechanical monsters: “We are irremovable from that equation.”

vitrupo

20,886 次观看 • 1 年前

"...the institutions aren't functioning. And you can tell because instead of giving you noisy, good advice, instead of giving you random advice, they give you upside down pyramids. They give you the inverse of the right advice. And that is an alarming fact. It tells you that there is a process in there that knows what to do and tells you the opposite." - Bret Weinstein

"...the institutions aren't functioning. And you can tell because instead of giving you noisy, good advice, instead of giving you random advice, they give you upside down pyramids. They give you the inverse of the right advice. And that is an alarming fact. It tells you that there is a process in there that knows what to do and tells you the opposite." - Bret Weinstein

The DarkHorse Podcast

29,107 次观看 • 5 个月前

Zack Polanski, "We're in this mess in the first place largely because of the Balfour declaration, and because of the British response to Palestine and Israel" "And the idea that we need British politicians to wade in right now with what they think the solution is repeating history" "I'd like to see civic groups in Palestine and Israel getting together" "We've got a loose ceasefire, that's part one. We now need a peace process" "The idea that Tony Blair is going to be the person to lead the peace process is like putting an arsonist in charge of the fire"

Zack Polanski, "We're in this mess in the first place largely because of the Balfour declaration, and because of the British response to Palestine and Israel" "And the idea that we need British politicians to wade in right now with what they think the solution is repeating history" "I'd like to see civic groups in Palestine and Israel getting together" "We've got a loose ceasefire, that's part one. We now need a peace process" "The idea that Tony Blair is going to be the person to lead the peace process is like putting an arsonist in charge of the fire"

Farrukh

67,812 次观看 • 8 个月前