Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Brian Albert testified the bulkhead Opened directly toward the kitchen bay windows, Made a loud old rusty metal creaking sound, Was loud enough to hear from the kitchen..... but we all know they were playing music that night!.... Led to a basement door they “kept locked because they didn’t... use it” But somehow this was all just random throwaway testimony? Interesting. Because if John O’Keefe’s FIRST entry into that house wasn’t through the front door everyone keeps arguing about… but instead through that bulkhead AFTER an altercation… suddenly a LOT of things people can’t explain start lining up such as Why nobody “saw” him upstairs Why nobody remembers greeting him, Why music/noise matters, Why timing matters Why the bulkhead details suddenly mattered on redirect...And now imagine that old rusty metal bulkhead opening in the middle of the night… was it opened at a time when certain people already knew exactly what was going on? What if John wasn’t in the warm house…but also wasn’t fully exposed on the front lawn the entire time? What if he was in the bulkhead area? A cold, enclosed, partially shielded space attached to the house. Cold enough for the phone temperature to steadily crash. Shielded enough to slow total exposure. Hidden enough that nobody in the kitchen “saw him.”show more

Dixie Normus

8,345 subscribers

24,986 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🇮🇱 Former Israeli Soldier Breaks His Silence on Raiding Homes of Palestinians: "Made Sure the People in the House were Innocent" Transcript: "We would open up the maps and look at the specific house that looked into the right place that we had to enter a city center or a road. And after we would verify that the house has the best parameters, windows and geographical area, we made sure the people in the house were innocent. It so we would enter a house of an innocent Palestinian home in the middle of the night. But I would say that what motivated me eventually to break my silence was the piercing eyes of young Palestinians when I was barging into their house in the middle of the night. I could always justify it to myself. But those eyes, the anger, their fear, was what eventually helped me overcome that. A house of a physician in Nabilus, for example, that I entered in the middle of the night, taking him, his wife and his daughter and pushing them in a room if they wanted to use their bathroom or their kitchen or use their phone, they need permission from me. That specific house in Abelis stayed with me for a while because that physician himself was kind enough and generous enough to sit down and explain to me what it means to be a Palestinian. And I thought that I was a good moral soldier, but I was actually helping entrench the occupation in that sense."

🇮🇱 Former Israeli Soldier Breaks His Silence on Raiding Homes of Palestinians: "Made Sure the People in the House were Innocent" Transcript: "We would open up the maps and look at the specific house that looked into the right place that we had to enter a city center or a road. And after we would verify that the house has the best parameters, windows and geographical area, we made sure the people in the house were innocent. It so we would enter a house of an innocent Palestinian home in the middle of the night. But I would say that what motivated me eventually to break my silence was the piercing eyes of young Palestinians when I was barging into their house in the middle of the night. I could always justify it to myself. But those eyes, the anger, their fear, was what eventually helped me overcome that. A house of a physician in Nabilus, for example, that I entered in the middle of the night, taking him, his wife and his daughter and pushing them in a room if they wanted to use their bathroom or their kitchen or use their phone, they need permission from me. That specific house in Abelis stayed with me for a while because that physician himself was kind enough and generous enough to sit down and explain to me what it means to be a Palestinian. And I thought that I was a good moral soldier, but I was actually helping entrench the occupation in that sense."

Mario Nawfal

570,024 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Dr John E Mack opened a door most of us are still afraid to walk through. He said the phenomenon wasn’t just in the sky. It was in us. They tried to silence him for that. Now the world is catching up.. what a pioneer.

Dr John E Mack opened a door most of us are still afraid to walk through. He said the phenomenon wasn’t just in the sky. It was in us. They tried to silence him for that. Now the world is catching up.. what a pioneer.

Holly Nanu

50,059 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Asked why he made the decision to take out Nicolás Maduro, President Trump laid it out plainly. “It just was the right time to do it. We had to do it because it’s a war. We’re losing 300,000 people a year.” Trump then revealed new details from the raid. He said Maduro was holed up in what was essentially a fortress. “He was in a house that was more like a fortress than a house. It had steel doors, it had what they call a safety space where it’s, you know, solid steel all around.” Maduro tried to reach that reinforced area as the operation unfolded. “He didn’t get that space closed. He was trying to get into it, but he got bum rushed so fast that he didn’t get into that.” The U.S. military was prepared for anything. “We were prepared. We had, you know, massive blow torches and everything else that you need to get through that steel, but we didn’t need it.” “He didn’t make it to that area of the house.”

Asked why he made the decision to take out Nicolás Maduro, President Trump laid it out plainly. “It just was the right time to do it. We had to do it because it’s a war. We’re losing 300,000 people a year.” Trump then revealed new details from the raid. He said Maduro was holed up in what was essentially a fortress. “He was in a house that was more like a fortress than a house. It had steel doors, it had what they call a safety space where it’s, you know, solid steel all around.” Maduro tried to reach that reinforced area as the operation unfolded. “He didn’t get that space closed. He was trying to get into it, but he got bum rushed so fast that he didn’t get into that.” The U.S. military was prepared for anything. “We were prepared. We had, you know, massive blow torches and everything else that you need to get through that steel, but we didn’t need it.” “He didn’t make it to that area of the house.”

Overton

553,628 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 Benin 🇧🇯- What the hell is going on? It was already night in Cotonou when the people came out to support the army like they did on Sunday morning when they heard that Talon was captured? We can clearly hear “Vive les patriotes! Vive les patriotes!” Meaning, long live the patriots! Now this is really confusing because we saw Patrice Talon on tv saying that the situation was under control. Is that video a real one or is it a tempered version? I hope it’s not an old video of last year’s September foiled coup d’état ? I saw a video of Patrice Talon talking to the army. But that was an old video of December 30th, 2024. Strangely, the attire he was wearing is the same we saw on tv Sunday night. If the coup was thwarted, why did ECOWAS still decide to send in its troops with immediate effect? Why did France Diplomatie 🇫🇷🇪🇺 at 10:48pm Paris local time state that they condemn the attempted coup and are calling for a respect of constitutional order? Last but not least, the U.S. embassy in Cotonou, Benin released a statement at 8:30pm local time that there were still gunshots heard in the city. What the hell is really going on ?

🚨 Benin 🇧🇯- What the hell is going on? It was already night in Cotonou when the people came out to support the army like they did on Sunday morning when they heard that Talon was captured? We can clearly hear “Vive les patriotes! Vive les patriotes!” Meaning, long live the patriots! Now this is really confusing because we saw Patrice Talon on tv saying that the situation was under control. Is that video a real one or is it a tempered version? I hope it’s not an old video of last year’s September foiled coup d’état ? I saw a video of Patrice Talon talking to the army. But that was an old video of December 30th, 2024. Strangely, the attire he was wearing is the same we saw on tv Sunday night. If the coup was thwarted, why did ECOWAS still decide to send in its troops with immediate effect? Why did France Diplomatie 🇫🇷🇪🇺 at 10:48pm Paris local time state that they condemn the attempted coup and are calling for a respect of constitutional order? Last but not least, the U.S. embassy in Cotonou, Benin released a statement at 8:30pm local time that there were still gunshots heard in the city. What the hell is really going on ?

Sy Marcus Herve Traore

180,305 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Let’s talk Grammy. The most outrageous part of the night wasn’t a speech. It was watching a moment that visually screamed blackface pass without consequence, and then watching selective outrage play out in real time and in the days that followed. What was done to Drake wasn’t just criticism. It was the weaponization of the culture’s own internal scars and stereotypes against a Black man. Every historical stain ever used against Black people was recycled and redeployed from inside the culture and pinned onto him. Because it was the one language everyone already understood and felt: Culture vulture. Not Black enough. Inauthentic. Industry-made. Moral suspicion. Predatory narratives. They even reached for blackface- stripped of its context. Those accusations worked because they tapped into our shared pain, the used old policing tools “profiling” laundered through “cultural discourse,” and made it feel righteous instead of what they actually were. They were things we’ve all seen done to us from the outside and felt on the inside. That’s why the accusations were effective. That’s why they spread. That’s how they initially won over regular people. Your initial reaction was never organic, the labels, used the tactics of profiling, and our pain to make Drake the bad guy. And that’s where the black-face contrast matters. When Drake used blackface as commentary, to expose how Black artists are treated, it became a permanent stain. But when a whyt man appears on the Grammys stage doing something that visually reads as blackface, there is no outrage to be found. He was rewarded with applause, and you all outrage at a speech praising hard working immigrants. If it’s really about the culture, why didn’t Kendrick Lamar or Pusha T say a word when someone used blackface right in front of them- on the very stage they stood on? That tells the truth. This was never about protecting Black culture. It was about gatekeeping it , using familiar wounds to rally the crowd and control who’s allowed to lead, dominate, and redefine the space, and who must be contained. They didn’t challenge Drake’s art, not once. They used the culture’s own scars as weapons to try to disqualify him. Because the outrage is built on shared scars, not shared principles. That’s why it only moves when it’s convenient. Because this was never really about the culture, but the “culture”. It was always about control. It was a strategy.

Let’s talk Grammy. The most outrageous part of the night wasn’t a speech. It was watching a moment that visually screamed blackface pass without consequence, and then watching selective outrage play out in real time and in the days that followed. What was done to Drake wasn’t just criticism. It was the weaponization of the culture’s own internal scars and stereotypes against a Black man. Every historical stain ever used against Black people was recycled and redeployed from inside the culture and pinned onto him. Because it was the one language everyone already understood and felt: Culture vulture. Not Black enough. Inauthentic. Industry-made. Moral suspicion. Predatory narratives. They even reached for blackface- stripped of its context. Those accusations worked because they tapped into our shared pain, the used old policing tools “profiling” laundered through “cultural discourse,” and made it feel righteous instead of what they actually were. They were things we’ve all seen done to us from the outside and felt on the inside. That’s why the accusations were effective. That’s why they spread. That’s how they initially won over regular people. Your initial reaction was never organic, the labels, used the tactics of profiling, and our pain to make Drake the bad guy. And that’s where the black-face contrast matters. When Drake used blackface as commentary, to expose how Black artists are treated, it became a permanent stain. But when a whyt man appears on the Grammys stage doing something that visually reads as blackface, there is no outrage to be found. He was rewarded with applause, and you all outrage at a speech praising hard working immigrants. If it’s really about the culture, why didn’t Kendrick Lamar or Pusha T say a word when someone used blackface right in front of them- on the very stage they stood on? That tells the truth. This was never about protecting Black culture. It was about gatekeeping it , using familiar wounds to rally the crowd and control who’s allowed to lead, dominate, and redefine the space, and who must be contained. They didn’t challenge Drake’s art, not once. They used the culture’s own scars as weapons to try to disqualify him. Because the outrage is built on shared scars, not shared principles. That’s why it only moves when it’s convenient. Because this was never really about the culture, but the “culture”. It was always about control. It was a strategy.

industrypolitics

19,415 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇺🇸 TRUMP ON EPSTEIN: "I WAS NOT WITH HIM" “But no matter what we give, it’s never enough. You know, with Kennedy, we gave everything and it wasn’t enough. With Martin Luther King, we gave everything and it’s never enough. We’ve already given, I believe the number is 50,000 pages. 50,000 pages. And it’s just a Russia, Russia, Russia hoax as it pertains to the Republicans. Now, I believe that many of the people that we, some of the people that we mentioned are being looked at very seriously for their relationship to Jeffrey Epstein. But they were with him all the time. I wasn’t. I wasn’t at all. We’ll see what happens.” Source: Aaron Rupar

🇺🇸 TRUMP ON EPSTEIN: "I WAS NOT WITH HIM" “But no matter what we give, it’s never enough. You know, with Kennedy, we gave everything and it wasn’t enough. With Martin Luther King, we gave everything and it’s never enough. We’ve already given, I believe the number is 50,000 pages. 50,000 pages. And it’s just a Russia, Russia, Russia hoax as it pertains to the Republicans. Now, I believe that many of the people that we, some of the people that we mentioned are being looked at very seriously for their relationship to Jeffrey Epstein. But they were with him all the time. I wasn’t. I wasn’t at all. We’ll see what happens.” Source: Aaron Rupar

Mario Nawfal

1,690,751 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

John Methu: If I am given a microphone another time, I would say the exact words. I feel very proud of myself that I was able to defeat fear and speak in front of the head of state and tell him all the things that matter to my people. There is a reason why the crowd was following me, and they were reacting the way they were reacting. I was in very unfamiliar territory; I knew everybody in that stadium had been mobilized to come to the stadium. The things I spoke about are things that I know touch the people #CitizenSundayLive

John Methu: If I am given a microphone another time, I would say the exact words. I feel very proud of myself that I was able to defeat fear and speak in front of the head of state and tell him all the things that matter to my people. There is a reason why the crowd was following me, and they were reacting the way they were reacting. I was in very unfamiliar territory; I knew everybody in that stadium had been mobilized to come to the stadium. The things I spoke about are things that I know touch the people #CitizenSundayLive

Citizen TV Kenya

25,907 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 “YOU WERE LIED TO” Millions didn’t take the vaccine out of fear for themselves. They took it to “protect others.” To protect parents. Grandparents. The vulnerable. That was the message. Repeated relentlessly. “Stop the spread.” “Protect your loved ones.” “Do your part.” But now? Voices are emerging saying that claim was never properly proven — and may never have been true in the way it was presented. If that’s the case, then this isn’t a misunderstanding. It’s a breach of trust on a global scale. Because people didn’t just make a medical decision — they made a moral one. And they made it based on what they were told. The real question now isn’t just what happened… It’s why people were so certain when the evidence wasn’t.

🚨 “YOU WERE LIED TO” Millions didn’t take the vaccine out of fear for themselves. They took it to “protect others.” To protect parents. Grandparents. The vulnerable. That was the message. Repeated relentlessly. “Stop the spread.” “Protect your loved ones.” “Do your part.” But now? Voices are emerging saying that claim was never properly proven — and may never have been true in the way it was presented. If that’s the case, then this isn’t a misunderstanding. It’s a breach of trust on a global scale. Because people didn’t just make a medical decision — they made a moral one. And they made it based on what they were told. The real question now isn’t just what happened… It’s why people were so certain when the evidence wasn’t.

Jim Ferguson

22,972 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Deion Sanders should be the next Head Coach of the Dallas Cowboys. I was the first person to say it last year on the set of Monday Night Countdown when it wasn’t a popular opinion. Everyone wasn’t convinced at that time and THAT WAS OKAY. But I saw what Coach Prime was building at Colorado and when you know, you know. Now some of the same people who didn’t believe before, believe now. The difference is the Cowboys need Deion Sanders, but he doesn’t need them. Colorado is home and he built it. The only way they get him now, is if they Draft his sons Shedeur and Shilo Sanders.

Deion Sanders should be the next Head Coach of the Dallas Cowboys. I was the first person to say it last year on the set of Monday Night Countdown when it wasn’t a popular opinion. Everyone wasn’t convinced at that time and THAT WAS OKAY. But I saw what Coach Prime was building at Colorado and when you know, you know. Now some of the same people who didn’t believe before, believe now. The difference is the Cowboys need Deion Sanders, but he doesn’t need them. Colorado is home and he built it. The only way they get him now, is if they Draft his sons Shedeur and Shilo Sanders.

Robert Griffin III

683,092 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Quentin Tarantino on Sergio Leone: "People sometimes think that Leone was the first Italian to make spaghetti westerns. But of course he wasn’t. Sergio Corbucci was doing a spaghetti western in 1964, the same time Leone was doing Fistful of Dollars. But he wasn’t trying to do something different at that time — he was actually trying to be more like the American westerns, and this is reflected in the music, which isn’t operatic at all. It was Leone who put the music to task and turned it to opera. I know there are examples that will be contrary to what I am saying, but it feels as if Leone is the first guy ever to cut picture to music in that way. Before him it just happened by accident where somebody thought it would be cool for a little sequence, but didn’t think they should do it for the rest of the movie. But the way we cut to music now: you pick some rock song and you cut your scene to that song. That all started with Leone and Morricone, and particularly with The Good, the Bad and the Ugly." — excerpt from Quentin Tarantino's forward to “Once Upon a Time in the West: Shooting a Masterpiece” by Christopher Frayling, published in 2019

Quentin Tarantino on Sergio Leone: "People sometimes think that Leone was the first Italian to make spaghetti westerns. But of course he wasn’t. Sergio Corbucci was doing a spaghetti western in 1964, the same time Leone was doing Fistful of Dollars. But he wasn’t trying to do something different at that time — he was actually trying to be more like the American westerns, and this is reflected in the music, which isn’t operatic at all. It was Leone who put the music to task and turned it to opera. I know there are examples that will be contrary to what I am saying, but it feels as if Leone is the first guy ever to cut picture to music in that way. Before him it just happened by accident where somebody thought it would be cool for a little sequence, but didn’t think they should do it for the rest of the movie. But the way we cut to music now: you pick some rock song and you cut your scene to that song. That all started with Leone and Morricone, and particularly with The Good, the Bad and the Ugly." — excerpt from Quentin Tarantino's forward to “Once Upon a Time in the West: Shooting a Masterpiece” by Christopher Frayling, published in 2019

RadiantFilm

100,797 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Carlos Alcaraz says he initially wasn’t sure if he was cramping or if it was an issue with his adductor during his match against Zverev, ‘I just told what happened to the physio & he decided to take a medical’ “I didn’t think it was cramps at all at the beginning. I didn’t know exactly what it was. I ran to a forehand and started to feel it in the right adductor. That’s why I called the physio. Because it was just that moment, the rest of the legs.. the left leg was good. Not good but decent. After that with all the stress I didn’t know what was going on. I didn’t know if it was going to be worse or not. In that moment I just talked to the physio and said ‘Ok I just went to run to the forehand side and I started to feel the right adductor.’ He decided to take the medical time out and he did it. I just told what happened to the physio and he decided to take a medical.” (via Australian Open Press)

Carlos Alcaraz says he initially wasn’t sure if he was cramping or if it was an issue with his adductor during his match against Zverev, ‘I just told what happened to the physio & he decided to take a medical’ “I didn’t think it was cramps at all at the beginning. I didn’t know exactly what it was. I ran to a forehand and started to feel it in the right adductor. That’s why I called the physio. Because it was just that moment, the rest of the legs.. the left leg was good. Not good but decent. After that with all the stress I didn’t know what was going on. I didn’t know if it was going to be worse or not. In that moment I just talked to the physio and said ‘Ok I just went to run to the forehand side and I started to feel the right adductor.’ He decided to take the medical time out and he did it. I just told what happened to the physio and he decided to take a medical.” (via Australian Open Press)

The Tennis Letter

516,837 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

In a shocking CCTV footage from the Kitchen of the house of Businessman Satyam Mittal from Bijnor in UP, it was revealed that their 55 years old maid Samanna was urinating in the kitchen. Samanna use to urinate in a glass inside the kitchen after that she used to sprinkle that urine on the kitchen utensils. Later she use to serve food to the Mittal Family in the same utensils. Police detained her but later released after issuing a challan for breach of peace.

In a shocking CCTV footage from the Kitchen of the house of Businessman Satyam Mittal from Bijnor in UP, it was revealed that their 55 years old maid Samanna was urinating in the kitchen. Samanna use to urinate in a glass inside the kitchen after that she used to sprinkle that urine on the kitchen utensils. Later she use to serve food to the Mittal Family in the same utensils. Police detained her but later released after issuing a challan for breach of peace.

NCMIndia Council For Men Affairs

475,769 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

When Karen Read gets deposed for the wrongful death lawsuit brought upon her by the victim’s family, it will be interesting to see which “door” she says John entered. So many options. FACT: Karen Read never said she saw John enter the house until after she was arrested for Manslaughter. She never even asked one person who she knew was in that house ‘what happened’ that night and why John was on the lawn where she left him.

When Karen Read gets deposed for the wrongful death lawsuit brought upon her by the victim’s family, it will be interesting to see which “door” she says John entered. So many options. FACT: Karen Read never said she saw John enter the house until after she was arrested for Manslaughter. She never even asked one person who she knew was in that house ‘what happened’ that night and why John was on the lawn where she left him.

Tuesday Gazette

18,130 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

"Why the cover-up?" Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace questions why powerful figures mentioned in the Epstein files are still being shielded from accountability. "We're talking about one of the biggest scandals in American history, where basically nobody went to jail." "People knew what was going on, they knew where it was happening, they knew who was doing it." "This is a cover-up."

"Why the cover-up?" Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace questions why powerful figures mentioned in the Epstein files are still being shielded from accountability. "We're talking about one of the biggest scandals in American history, where basically nobody went to jail." "People knew what was going on, they knew where it was happening, they knew who was doing it." "This is a cover-up."

Wide Awake Media

20,698 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🧸 ah i wanted to talk about this! i saw a lot of people holding birthday cafes at the cafes in front of the cafe and in a lot of other places…it was a shame that i couldn’t see it with my own eyes but i was really grateful that day because so many people were celebrating my birthday 🧸 if it were up to me, it wasn’t for the surgery, i would go to the cafes in front of the company and i’d want to give something to moas if there were any that there were there…but maybe on my next birthday or when i get the time again, i’ll make the dream that i couldn’t fulfil this time, come true 💗

🧸 ah i wanted to talk about this! i saw a lot of people holding birthday cafes at the cafes in front of the cafe and in a lot of other places…it was a shame that i couldn’t see it with my own eyes but i was really grateful that day because so many people were celebrating my birthday 🧸 if it were up to me, it wasn’t for the surgery, i would go to the cafes in front of the company and i’d want to give something to moas if there were any that there were there…but maybe on my next birthday or when i get the time again, i’ll make the dream that i couldn’t fulfil this time, come true 💗

💬

48,406 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

John Leonetti has now donated thousands of dollars to the House Defendants’ legal fund. This is the same John Leonetti who owned the home where, by sworn testimony, a large group of under-21 kids were drinking on the night of January 28, 2022. That’s not speculation. That comes from their own witnesses. Colin Albert testified he was at Leonetti’s house that night and there was a text shared in which he was “chugging beers.” He also testified Allie picked him up from that house and drove him to Fairview. Allie then claims she later picked him up again from Fairview to bring him home. There are no independent facts, records, that corroborate that second pickup. That matters. When people point out this very narrow, very factual issue that an adult homeowner allegedly allowed underage drinking and that this house sits squarely in the timeline what happens? Instead of answers, we get attacks. The loudest voices backing the house defendants, including so-called “true crime” commentators like Julie Carpenter, don’t address the question at all. They attack the person asking it. No clarification. No denial. No explanation. Just outrage. Why is questioning this labeled “obsession,” while donating thousands to defend those witnesses is considered noble? And most importantly, why is scrutiny only acceptable when it points away from certain people but suddenly “disturbing” when it points toward them? If the story is solid, it should withstand questions. If the timelines are true, they should align with evidence. And if underage drinking, pickups, drop-offs, and missing corroboration are irrelevant then someone should be able to say why. So far, no one has. Just attacks.

John Leonetti has now donated thousands of dollars to the House Defendants’ legal fund. This is the same John Leonetti who owned the home where, by sworn testimony, a large group of under-21 kids were drinking on the night of January 28, 2022. That’s not speculation. That comes from their own witnesses. Colin Albert testified he was at Leonetti’s house that night and there was a text shared in which he was “chugging beers.” He also testified Allie picked him up from that house and drove him to Fairview. Allie then claims she later picked him up again from Fairview to bring him home. There are no independent facts, records, that corroborate that second pickup. That matters. When people point out this very narrow, very factual issue that an adult homeowner allegedly allowed underage drinking and that this house sits squarely in the timeline what happens? Instead of answers, we get attacks. The loudest voices backing the house defendants, including so-called “true crime” commentators like Julie Carpenter, don’t address the question at all. They attack the person asking it. No clarification. No denial. No explanation. Just outrage. Why is questioning this labeled “obsession,” while donating thousands to defend those witnesses is considered noble? And most importantly, why is scrutiny only acceptable when it points away from certain people but suddenly “disturbing” when it points toward them? If the story is solid, it should withstand questions. If the timelines are true, they should align with evidence. And if underage drinking, pickups, drop-offs, and missing corroboration are irrelevant then someone should be able to say why. So far, no one has. Just attacks.

Dixie Normus

26,969 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Flex Alexander reveals that Michael Jackson wasn’t a fan of the Man in the Mirror biopic he starred in — and that he himself eventually realized how bad it was. His excitement initially grew when he thought they’d be able to use Michael’s music, but midway through filming he learned that wasn’t the case. He also says they airbrushed him to appear white and even suggested he wear a prosthetic nose — a request he was able to decline. A few reasons that explain exactly why the film turned out the way it did 🎥: The Art Of Dialogue 🔗:

Flex Alexander reveals that Michael Jackson wasn’t a fan of the Man in the Mirror biopic he starred in — and that he himself eventually realized how bad it was. His excitement initially grew when he thought they’d be able to use Michael’s music, but midway through filming he learned that wasn’t the case. He also says they airbrushed him to appear white and even suggested he wear a prosthetic nose — a request he was able to decline. A few reasons that explain exactly why the film turned out the way it did 🎥: The Art Of Dialogue 🔗:

Glock Topickz

392,890 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

A TRAP DOOR located directly under the draped table in front of Charlie? You have to see this. What if they took down that camera directly behind Charlie right away because it showed too much? Maybe it showed something or someone coming from a trap door under the table that was directly in front of Charlie. Maybe that's why his shirt made the odd movement besides from the bullet shockwave. Not saying that this is solid proof of anything but we need the autopsy and ballistics report to start crossing out all the theories floating around. If we can even trust them if they even come out. Just something to think about and a reason as to why they removed that camera and its SD card immediately.

A TRAP DOOR located directly under the draped table in front of Charlie? You have to see this. What if they took down that camera directly behind Charlie right away because it showed too much? Maybe it showed something or someone coming from a trap door under the table that was directly in front of Charlie. Maybe that's why his shirt made the odd movement besides from the bullet shockwave. Not saying that this is solid proof of anything but we need the autopsy and ballistics report to start crossing out all the theories floating around. If we can even trust them if they even come out. Just something to think about and a reason as to why they removed that camera and its SD card immediately.

The SCIF

2,478,178 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

A walk from the bulkhead to the front yard.

A walk from the bulkhead to the front yard.

Nick Rocco

94,569 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr