Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Britain has faced hardship before. Today's crisis is fundamentally different In the 1940s/50s & 70s, Britain was culturally intact & homogenous, it could rebound economically with no lasting effect Today's crisis isn't just economic, it's cultural, social, demographic & institutional There may have been class conflict and left right...

26,979 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Mendy Howe
Mendy Howevor 1 Jahr

Yes. That's why this crisis is an existential one. Seriously, Islamic creep is progressing at a rapid pace. Islam must be eradicated from the UK through mass deportation and remigration. Better still, by self-remigration by banning halal, burqa, mosques, sharia and quran. .

Profilbild von Stu Thresh
Stu Threshvor 1 Jahr

Rafe is always over the target, a colossus is required to reverse 30+ years of abject state failure. I’m up for it!

Profilbild von Oil4ever! 🇬🇧 🇮🇱 ♥️🚜
Oil4ever! 🇬🇧 🇮🇱 ♥️🚜vor 1 Jahr

@HHelenakhl There is growing anger at what we have been told to accept as inevitable. Many peoples' patience is wearing very thin now. They hate what they see happening to their country & will mobilise around a credible figurehead. Cromwell 2.0 perhaps?

Profilbild von Quint
Quintvor 1 Jahr

Britain was culturally homogeneous despite being made up of 3 distinct countries with their own cultures and languages? You're a fucking idiot

Profilbild von For England🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
For England🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿vor 1 Jahr

It’s not the King. It’s not the heir to the throne, or any royalty. Farage seems the best bet right now. Get him into Downing Street and invoke emergency powers to deal with this crisis. Military and police need to be onboard. Expect unrest.

Profilbild von The Liberation Project
The Liberation Projectvor 1 Jahr

𝐖𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐡𝐲 𝐄𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐅𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 Scott Galloway, multi-millionaire professor, gives dire warning about the decline of American capitalism, expanding wealth inequality and far-right CEOs. ★ NEW ARTICLE ⬇️

Profilbild von ByNiels
ByNielsvor 1 Jahr

Yes, we need a new Thatcher.

Profilbild von David Lawton
David Lawtonvor 1 Jahr

Always look forward to your talks Rafe, always right, no one can doubt your word as it’s true!👍🏻👍🏻

Profilbild von Ellie
Ellievor 1 Jahr

Such a clever and beautiful man ❤️

Profilbild von Albion’s Last Laugh
Albion’s Last Laughvor 1 Jahr

In the past, Britain faced crises with a common culture and a shared identity. Now we face one another. The economy may yet be fixed, but who repairs a nation that no longer speaks the same language, sings the same songs, or laughs at the same jokes. The malaise runs deep.

Profilbild von Maureen O'Brien
Maureen O'Brienvor 1 Jahr

Ben Habib is your answer.

Ähnliche Videos

Liz Truss's full speech at CPAC Who needs enemies when you have former Prime Minister's trashing our country 🤷‍♂️ And never forget, she lost to a lettuce 🥬 -- Well, ladies and gentlemen, it's fantastic to be back in America and it's fantastic to be back at CPAC for the second year in a row. But last year, there was a dark cloud hanging over this conference. It was called Joe Biden. And this year, we are now under the leadership of President Donald Trump. This is truly. This is truly the golden age of America. But I'm sad to report. I'm sad to report that Britain is in the dark age. We have a socialist government, commissars ruling over us, who are leading our country in a terrible direction. But what I want to say today is they are not the only problem. The current establishment stooges in Whitehall and Westminster are only the latest iteration of Britain going wrong for the past few decades. Because, let's be honest, Britain isn't working. The British system is deeply rotten. Britain is becoming a failed state. We've got people who are being arrested and locked up for posting on X and Facebook. We've seen tens of thousands of girls as young as 12 raped, tortured and even killed by Pakistani grooming gangs. And yet many of those perpetrators have not been brought to justice. In fact, those crimes have been covered up. And we know that the authorities colluded. We know there was police collusion and we know there was collusion from the local council. We have a massive problem with illegal immigration, but yet we can't even deport people who are criminals from our country because of human rights. One example was a immigrant from the Democratic Republic of Congo who had sexually abused his own stepdaughter. But he was allowed to stay in Britain on the basis of the right to family life. How disgusting. A criminal from Albania was allowed to stay in Britain because his son didn't like the kind of chicken nuggets they sell abroad. And I'm not joking you there. But it's not just a problem we have with mass migration and illegal immigration. We've also got a problem with our energy in Britain. So in Britain, fracking has been banned. I was the only Prime Minister who allowed fracking. Sadly, I wasn't in office long enough to actually make it happen. We have net zero policies that have decimated our oil and gas industry. The net result is we have the highest energy prices in the developed world. And in Britain, we've just seen the last steel plant close down last year. We cannot produce our own steel anymore. We have an economic orthodoxy, a Bank of England that has printed vast amounts of money. They've created rampant inflation. They've wasted billions of taxpayer pounds. If they Weren't the government, it would be called a heist. Yet in none of these cases, in none of these cases have any of these people, any of these authorities been held to account for the fact they have completely failed. And we're in a situation where Britain is almost bankrupt morally, socially and economically. And I think people in this room might want to know, how on earth has this happened? This is the country that invented parliamentary democracy. It's the country of the Magna Carta. It's the country of the Bill of Rights. We protected freedom of the press back in 1695, almost 100 years before the First Amendment. How on earth can the country of Adam Smith and the Industrial Revolution be de. Industrializing? It doesn't make any sense. And the answer is that everything that made Britain great is being destroyed by an establishment that hates Britain and hates the West. Like in most of Europe, our universities, our institutions and our corporations have been taken over by anti west ideology, Islamism, green extremism, anti capitalism, wokery, transgenderism. You name it, they've adopted it. And what we've seen is a massive failure of leaders in Europe to push back against this. Because this is not something the population wanted. This is not something the people in Britain or Europe voted for. This is something that was imposed from above. And what happened is that democratically elected politicians handed vast amounts of power over to the unelected and the unaccountable. In Britain, Tony Blair in particular, trashed centuries of liberty by creating a tyranny of technocrats. He created an unaccountable Supreme Court which had never been existed in Britain before. He created a much deeper and powerful state that is not held to account. He also handed vast powers over to an Alphabet soup of international bodies, the World Health Organization, the United nations, the ECHR, all of whom nobody could vote in and nobody could vote out. And all of those bodies, as you've seen in the United States of America, have been captured by the same anti west ideology. But what I find really incredible, really, really incredible is it wasn't just China and Iran and Russia that were funding these NGOs, funding these anti west groups. It was actually the United States of America under President Joe Biden through USAID Now, did you know that American taxpayer dollars was funding the BBC? Did you know that they were funding the Tony Blair Institute? Did you know that they were funding Rory Stewart's wife? It's incredible. We thought you were our friends, but you were actually American taxpayers were funding this anti west ideology. And the problem is when the people in Britain voted for something different when they tried to change the government, when they tried to change the system in 2016, in 2019 and in 2024, they found the same people were still in power. The bureaucracy had not changed. And it's no surprise that young people are losing their faith in democracy because they don't believe it can change things. And amazingly, during all of this, many so called conservatives went along with the ideology. They were busy hugging Greta Thunberg. They were putting up taxes. I'm not joking about that. They were putting up taxes. They were increasing immigration, they were pursuing transgender ideology. And it's no wonder that the Conservative Party had its worst defeat since 1834. Patriotic Brits have had enough. They've had enough. And we look across the Atlantic with envy. We see President Trump in the Executive, in the Oval Office, signing off executive orders. And we want some of that in Britain. We want drill, baby, drill. We want men banned from women's bathrooms and women's sports. We want illegal immigrants deported. We want taxes to be cut. We want a Trump revolution in Britain. We want to flood the zone. We want Elon and his nerd army of muskrats examining the British deep state. Ladies and gentlemen, we missed the first American Revolution in 1776. In fact, it was actually a revolution against us. But we want to be part of the second American revolution. We want to dismantle the British deep state, which is older and more entrenched than the American one. We need a great restoration bill to repeal all of the terrible Blair laws, the Equality act, the Climate Change act, the Human Rights act, the Constitutional Reform Act. We need to eradicate judicial activism in Britain and restore parliamentary sovereignty. We want our government run by the Executive, not by the bureaucracy. But most of all, what we need is we need to restore free speech. This is the lifeblood, our democracy. And J.D. vance is right. Vice President Vance is right. Free speech is in retreat in Britain and in Europe, to Europe's governments, particularly Britain. They see George Orwell's 1984 as an instruction manual. Look at the evidence. A British citizen was arrested for praying outside an abortion clinic. We have German prosecutors saying that if you insult somebody, you could be arrested. We had Alison Pearson, a British journalist, visited at her home by the police because of a tweet that she'd posted a year ago and since deleted. I want the police to be policing real crimes, not thought crimes. But not only this. We have a supine legacy media that pay lip service to free speech, but have suppressed stories and distorted stories. The BBC were found to have violated their editorial guidelines 1500 times in the four months after the appalling atrocities of October 7th. They were found to have been downplaying Hamas terrorism and promoting the idea that Israel was the aggressor. This is our state broadcaster funded by the taxpayer. The mainstream media have failed to report on the grooming scandal and they failed to hold the deep state to account. And much of the reason for that is the deep state of the people giving them all their information, all their leaks, all their funding, all of their material. And they're frightened of the media regulator, Ofcom. We have seen what independent media has done for the United States and we want some of that. That's why we are going to be establishing a new free speech media network in conjunction with our American allies, including, including the great people here at cpac. It will be uncensorable and uncancelable. It will take on the Britain Bashing Corporation, which is what we call the BBC. It will take on Starmer and his socialists and it will take on the censors of Germany because. Because it's only by telling people the truth in the United Kingdom, in Europe, in the Anglosphere, in America, that we will turn our backs on the war's west against itself. All of the people here are working to make America great again. I believe that we can make Britain great again. I believe that we can make Europe great again. And I believe that together we can make the west great again. Thank you. Thank you.

Farrukh

20,818 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Amazed that people can be so cavalier about the white British becoming a minority by the 2060s The consequences are profound If Britain's only 30% white British will it still be Britain? How can the integration of immigrants be achieved when the indigenous population is itself an ethnic minority? What will the dominant culture be for popular music, film, comedy, sport etc. – the things that traditionally bind a nation together and which help forge both social cohesion and a sense of national identity? All too often, debates around immigration focus upon the impact on our economy, infrastructure and public services. I would argue that the impact this has on our culture and the cohesion of our communities and wider British society is even more important. A country's economy, infrastructure and public services can always bounce back from hard times and extreme pressures. But when the demographics of a nation drastically & dramatically alter - relegating the indigenous population to the status of a minority - the cultural and social change is so profound, that it will be impossible to recover or restore. Demographics matter. All of the sociological and economic evidence shows that increased ethnic diversity leads to a decline in social trust, happiness and perceived quality of life. People from areas of high diversity are less likely to become involved in their community, less likely to vote, or to volunteer or join community organisations. They become reclusive, have fewer friends and have low trust in their neighbours. This has a corrosive effect on local communities. The decline in social trust leads to lack of civic pride and maintenance, and a rise in crime, vandalism and general decay. When a society doesn’t have much in common, it’s much less likely that they will feel united and invested in one another. Does anyone seriously believe Britain or the USA are more culturally intact, socially cohesive and harmonious than ethnically homogeneous Poland or Japan? Clip from my speech on this subject:

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

80,763 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

If you take strong action and it is very different action from what your country has known before...you can only be confident that your action is right if it is founded on strong principles. Mine was founded on the belief that governments are there to serve the liberties of the people under a rule of law, a free enterprise economy, and strong defence. After we lost the election in 1974, and the Labour Government came in, we had departed from our fundamental principles. And I set up a great study with many people—not only politicians but businessmen, academics, journalists—and we redrafted our whole principles. From the principles, we decided the policies and we sorted out what needed to be done and how it was to be done when we got into power. That took four years. I had confidence we were in the right and our policies would achieve the right. Although, as you know, great change means great dislocation. We had to cut expenditure; we had to privatise; we had to get down taxation; we had to cut the bureaucracy. All of the people objected, and for two and a half years my name was marred. It's always difficult to do the right thing. But my father had taught me to persevere: It's easy to be a starter, but are you a sticker-to? It's easy enough to begin a job, it's harder to see it through. And I saw it through. After three years, all of a sudden, the good things in the economy began to show through. At the same time, we had the Falklands, and against all odds we won. Although, the world thought it was really rather astonishing that Britain sent a fleet 8,000 miles away into the bitter cold Antarctic against a foe that had air cover from land when we only had it from aircraft carriers. So the two reinforced one another. But I couldn't have done it unless I had been confident that we had the right principles and that if we persisted, it would show through to the benefit of our people. I was never defeated in an election by the people of my country. That is my proudest boast.

Margaret Thatcher

11,205 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

On Friday, Bill Maher asked me if what happened with Biden at the disastrous debate with Trump was the same story as the Emperor's New Clothes. Me: The story of the Emperor's New Clothes is a story about common knowledge, because when the kid blurted it out, he actually wasn't telling anyone anything they didn't already know. They could see the Emperor was naked. But he still changed their knowledge, because by blurting it out with an earshot of the others, now everyone knew that everyone else knew that everyone else knew that everyone else knew. And what that allowed them to do is change their relationship with the Emperor, from obsequious deference to ridicule and scorn. And the thing about common knowledge in the social realm is that it's what props up our social relationships. And so when something is blurted out, then it can change everything. It changes the nature of your relationship with someone. Maher: And we do have sort of a modern version of the Emperor parable, which is Joe Biden. I mean, he was the Emperor who everyone wouldn't say had lost his marbles. I mean, is that not really the same story? Me: It is the same story, because opinion polls showed that after that disastrous debate with Trump, the number of people who thought that he was cognitively impaired didn't go up by that much. It went up by a few percentage points. But before, a majority of people thought that he was cognitively impaired. The difference is, when it's on TV, where you're watching it, you know that the rest of the country is watching it, you know the rest of the country knows the rest of the country, it's no longer private. It's common. And that's when he was challenged. That was the end. Bill Maher Real Time with Bill Maher

Steven Pinker

272,948 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

.Naval: Marxism, besides denying human incentives, also has a problem where it just assumes that everything is finite and we're all just dividing up the same small set of things. Well, the cavemen didn't have color TVs, computers, cars, antibiotics, or medicine. They were not sitting around dividing up the same few things. The knowledge grows, and we create more. It also tends to assume that we can freeze frame at some point in society and say, 'Well, we have enough different kinds of sneakers, enough different kinds of housing, we just need to allocate it better.' And that is not how anything works. David Deutsch has a great definition of wealth, which he says is the set of physical transformations that we can affect. So, when you think about it that way, you realize that knowledge is not just stored capital in the classic Marxist sense (capital vs. labor), but it's also knowledge on what to do with that capital. The cavemen or Palaeolithic ancestors had access to all the same resources we did. They were living on the same Earth, and by the modern environmentalist arguments, they had a better Earth—they had more to do things with. But yet, they couldn't do anything. They were not wealthy by any stretch of the imagination. Why? Because of knowledge. Life is not a zero-sum game, it's a positive-sum game. But we are hardwired to think it's a zero-sum game because, for millions or billions of years, there was no such thing as wealth. There was no such thing as persistent knowledge creation in the environment. What you had was a small amount of resources being divided up, and most of the games were status games—'Which monkey outranks which other monkey?' And that decides which monkey gets to eat first. We played that game for a billion years. Now, we come onto a recent game where, actually, we can all eat, and the big problem is obesity. It's no longer starvation. The big problem is boredom. It's not actually work. There's enough work. So, in this environment, switching your evolved mindset from a zero-sum game to a positive-sum game where we can all win, if we create knowledge together and use the resources that we have to create more resources and more wealth, that's the game we all need to be playing now.

Arjun Khemani

163,525 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Yes, we were isolated in the European Community when we tried to get a fair deal for Britain for the budget, and we stayed isolated until we succeeded and got the fair deal which eluded the Labour Government. Yes, we were isolated when we tried to reform the common agricultural policy, and eventually we got the reform of the agricultural policy. Yes, we were isolated when the European Community wanted a common withholding tax. We went on with our arguments and eventually we won. What he calls isolation is really leadership and winning the argument. The 1970s was a decade when Britain was in decline; when socialism meant that we had to be treated like some third world country and be rescued by the IMF. The 1980s have been the decade when Britain regained her strength and pride. We are no longer afraid of change. We can respond to it with confidence. British industry has been set free to adapt to new ways and new technology at an unparalleled rate. Businesses can once again get a good return on investment. That is why over the last three years we have seen a 40 per cent increase in business investment—an unprecedented advance. That is why industries like steel, newspapers and now the docks, whose equipment and working methods were barely adequate for the 1950s, have been transformed to compete with the best in the 1990s. That is why Britain has been getting the lion's share of overseas investment coming into the European Community. They prefer to come to Britain.

Margaret Thatcher

33,153 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat