Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Broken barricades, sit-in protests, “Deputy CM down down” echoing in Srisailam, that’s what Naidu’s world class administration delivered to Lord Shiva’s devotees! VIP darshan smooth, common bhakt tortured. This isn’t governance, it’s betrayal of Hinduism 🕉️🙏🏻
49,958 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)
0 Kommentare
Keine Kommentare verfügbar
Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt
![Senator Fetterman says he and socialist Mayor Zohran Mamdani agree on one thing: it’s reasonable to meet with the president if invited. But Fetterman called out the blatant double standard from Democrats over how he was treated versus Mamdani. FETTERMAN: “Well, we actually have some common ground with me and the socialist guy.” “We both agree it’s reasonable to meet with the president if they invite [you] to sit down and talk with them.” “I think what’s different is I haven’t seen a lot of blow back for Mamdani to do this but I got a lot, and I think it’s perfectly reasonable to sit down and have this conversation, and that’s what I have done back in January.”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1991965191391547727/amplify_video_thumb/1991964075966816257/img/Y9VzpdjK__0is8cV.jpg)
![Sen. Fetterman fires off a blunt message to AOC, Bernie Sanders, and every “Democratic socialist” in his party. As they try to take over the party, Fetterman gave them this reality check: “I promise you America’s future and my party’s future is not socialism or kinds of outlandish, far-left kinds of ideas.” He even said outright that the far-left wing is the reason Democrats are in this political hole. “It’s been a year [since] we lost the election. And part of those ideas pushed our party over the cliff. And that’s why we’re in this situation right now. That’s why we’re firmly in the minority, and that’s why we’ve lost control of the White House.” Fetterman kept going, drawing a clear line between what wins and what loses. “If you think [socialism] is a solution, that’s fine, but it’s going to be a competition of ideas, and we know that’s not going to prevail,” Fetterman said. “What’s going to prevail is common sense. What’s going to prevail is choosing this country over the extreme in our party. What’s going to prevail is common sense,” he stressed. “And I do believe… we should respond [to Trump] with order and logic and patriotism and not shutting down our government right now,” Fetterman argued. “And that’s where I’m at. And I don’t know why that’s controversial. That’s not a big tent party if you’re not allowed to have the opinion that it’s wrong to shut our government down and put these people in the middle of it.”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1988789296564740252/amplify_video_thumb/1988789215107162112/img/NWsaX0miMr_f4IGK.jpg)
![Jacob Siegel just delivered a warning that every American needs to hear: The power of “ruling class institutions” is quietly replacing the will of the American people in Washington. “The banking institutions.” “The large medical organizations.” “The media.” “The universities.” And this new “top-down” system built the “infrastructure that makes censorship possible.” Here’s how it happened, according to Siegel: “This concept of the ‘whole of society’ [approach] actually begins in the world of developmental organizations like the United Nations.” “It’s used to refer to breakneck modernization programs” in developing countries. “The idea was that instead of appealing to the public or to civil society, which presumably doesn’t exist, you coordinate through ‘whole of society.’” “Which is really a euphemism for the most powerful actors.” “The ruling class institutions.” “And then it jumps this concept… into the American domestic political system.” “It happens in the first Obama administration.” “Rather than necessarily needing to build up popular support by appealing to not only the general population, but also to local political parties, instead what you could do is… coordinate support of the most powerful institutions.” “By getting the media, the universities, the banking institutions, the large medical organizations, the insurance companies… on board, you could then impose this top-down policy.” Jacob Siegel](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2063622437695070256/media/HKN10omX0AECqCD.jpg)
