Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🌟 Builder Spotlight: MagicMinute by Adarsh Singh Chauhan Email overload is universal. Every inbox fills faster than we can clear it. Adarsh built an agent that takes that weight off your shoulders. 📥 The pain You open Gmail. 43 unread messages. Half need a quick reply. The rest can...

Superior_Agents's profile picture

Superior Agents

2,229 subscribers

12,203 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I’m excited to announce Net, an email app that understands what's important to you and helps you stay on top of it, right from your phone! Do you struggle to stay on top of your email, or feel like you need to set time aside and pull out your laptop just to make progress? Net uses AI to help you blast through your inbox on your phone, without missing anything important: - Get notifications about what truly needs your attention. No more checking every tab or email in Gmail. - Swipe through your email as a stack of cards, which makes it easy and fun to mark them done or set reminders to handle them later. - Speak to draft emails! Say a few words, and Net will instantly draft a well-written email in your voice. Not happy with the draft? Just tell it what to change, and see the change instantly. Early testers say this is the best LLM writing experience they’ve had. We’re releasing Net in beta today. It works with Gmail or Google Workspace emails on iOS. Repost or reply if you want to try it, and we’ll be in touch via DM with a TestFlight invite!
1:01

I’m excited to announce Net, an email app that understands what's important to you and helps you stay on top of it, right from your phone! Do you struggle to stay on top of your email, or feel like you need to set time aside and pull out your laptop just to make progress? Net uses AI to help you blast through your inbox on your phone, without missing anything important: - Get notifications about what truly needs your attention. No more checking every tab or email in Gmail. - Swipe through your email as a stack of cards, which makes it easy and fun to mark them done or set reminders to handle them later. - Speak to draft emails! Say a few words, and Net will instantly draft a well-written email in your voice. Not happy with the draft? Just tell it what to change, and see the change instantly. Early testers say this is the best LLM writing experience they’ve had. We’re releasing Net in beta today. It works with Gmail or Google Workspace emails on iOS. Repost or reply if you want to try it, and we’ll be in touch via DM with a TestFlight invite!

Jonathan Unikowski

90,673 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

✨New LangChain Academy Course: Learn to build with LangSmith Agent Builder 🪄 Learn how to build your own agents with LangSmith Agent Builder. Anyone can now build agents for complex daily tasks, without writing code. We built Agent Builder for anyone whose day gets swallowed by routine work. The research, follow-ups, updates, scheduling, and status checks that are essential to your operations, but quickly take over your calendar. Agent Builder is different from traditional workflow automations. You don’t need to map every step, tinker with if-this-then-that branching, or babysit dependencies. You just give it feedback like you would a teammate, and the agent learns using its memory. In this quickstart course, you'll learn how to: - Build an email agent - Understand what agents can do - Improve your agent - Set up triggers and your Agent Inbox Enroll for free ➡️
1:45

✨New LangChain Academy Course: Learn to build with LangSmith Agent Builder 🪄 Learn how to build your own agents with LangSmith Agent Builder. Anyone can now build agents for complex daily tasks, without writing code. We built Agent Builder for anyone whose day gets swallowed by routine work. The research, follow-ups, updates, scheduling, and status checks that are essential to your operations, but quickly take over your calendar. Agent Builder is different from traditional workflow automations. You don’t need to map every step, tinker with if-this-then-that branching, or babysit dependencies. You just give it feedback like you would a teammate, and the agent learns using its memory. In this quickstart course, you'll learn how to: - Build an email agent - Understand what agents can do - Improve your agent - Set up triggers and your Agent Inbox Enroll for free ➡️

LangChain

26,513 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

There are 8 billion people on earth. Soon there'll be 100 billion AI agents. Every one of them needs email. Six weeks ago I said the next wave of teams would run email through an agent instead of a dashboard. Today it ships. Nitrosend☄️ is launching Agentic Email Marketing: the email layer for the agent economy. What agents can do on Nitrosend right now: Sign themselves up. Point any agent at and it creates the account, connects your domain, sorts billing and sends its first email. No API key. No dashboard. No human required. Shipped, and users agents signing up with it daily. Get their own inboxes (beta, by request). Real addresses on the domain you own. Your agents receive, and send 1-1 email conversations with customers. A reply lands at 3am, your agent answers it. Anything that needs a human gets escalated to you. Ask us and we'll flick yours on. Next: Agentic Outreach (coming soon). Your agent studies your best customers, finds more like them, writes like a person, sends in sequence and works the replies. Then: set a goal and walk away. Goal-based agentic marketing is in development. "20% more activations this quarter" and Nitrosend plans, sends, measures and improves every week. Why we built this: Gmail is agent hostile and expensive per seat. Legacy email platforms assume a human sitting in a dashboard. agents needed an email layer of their own. They're already better at it than we are. They read everything, never miss a follow-up, and write personally at any scale. *94%* of actions on Nitrosend already happen inside an agent (Claude, Codex, ChatGPT, Cursor), not in our UI. Humans approve. Agents operate. This is our third email company. Six billion emails across the first two. We've been burned by every ugly part of email already, which is why the approval gates are built in exactly where you want them. Watch the launch, then send your agent to work: send it.
1:13

There are 8 billion people on earth. Soon there'll be 100 billion AI agents. Every one of them needs email. Six weeks ago I said the next wave of teams would run email through an agent instead of a dashboard. Today it ships. Nitrosend☄️ is launching Agentic Email Marketing: the email layer for the agent economy. What agents can do on Nitrosend right now: Sign themselves up. Point any agent at and it creates the account, connects your domain, sorts billing and sends its first email. No API key. No dashboard. No human required. Shipped, and users agents signing up with it daily. Get their own inboxes (beta, by request). Real addresses on the domain you own. Your agents receive, and send 1-1 email conversations with customers. A reply lands at 3am, your agent answers it. Anything that needs a human gets escalated to you. Ask us and we'll flick yours on. Next: Agentic Outreach (coming soon). Your agent studies your best customers, finds more like them, writes like a person, sends in sequence and works the replies. Then: set a goal and walk away. Goal-based agentic marketing is in development. "20% more activations this quarter" and Nitrosend plans, sends, measures and improves every week. Why we built this: Gmail is agent hostile and expensive per seat. Legacy email platforms assume a human sitting in a dashboard. agents needed an email layer of their own. They're already better at it than we are. They read everything, never miss a follow-up, and write personally at any scale. *94%* of actions on Nitrosend already happen inside an agent (Claude, Codex, ChatGPT, Cursor), not in our UI. Humans approve. Agents operate. This is our third email company. Six billion emails across the first two. We've been burned by every ugly part of email already, which is why the approval gates are built in exactly where you want them. Watch the launch, then send your agent to work: send it.

George Hartley ☄️

938,598 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

New short course: Long-Term Agentic Memory with LangGraph. Learn to build an agent with long-term memory in this course developed in collaboration with taught by its Co-Founder and CEO, Harrison Chase! Personal assistance and productivity tasks have become important use cases for agents. An important feature of an AI assistant, such as a coding or calendar assistant, is its ability to keep improving over time from its experience. Agent memory is the key capability that enables this. To add memory to an agent, you must first figure out what to store and what to retrieve when it is time to use the information. Additionally, you’ll have to decide when to update the stored information. For example, you might update in each iteration loop of the agent or perform updates in the background, with a helper agent. In this course, you will learn a mental framework to build agents with long-term memory. You'll create a useful email assistant that can respond, ignore, and notify using writing, scheduling, and memory-management tools. You’ll develop your agent's memory by adding facts to its memory store, provide examples to learn the user's preferences, and optimize system prompts to evolve instructions based on previous responses. In detail, you’ll: - Learn how the three types of memory--semantic, episodic, and procedural–and the two update mechanisms–via hot path and in the background–apply to your agents. - Build an email agent with writing, scheduling, and availability tools, along with a router that triages incoming email and handles it accordingly by ignoring, responding, or notifying the user. - Add tools to your email agent that allow it to operate on semantic memory by learning facts about the user, storing them in a long-term memory store, and searching over them in future interactions. - Incorporate episodic memory, in the form of few-shot examples, in the triage step of your agents to help them learn and update user preferences. - Add procedural memory as system prompts, optimized with feedback to improve the instructions the agent follows. Learn how to approach memory in agents, and start building agents with long-term memory with LangGraph! Please sign up here:
2:06

New short course: Long-Term Agentic Memory with LangGraph. Learn to build an agent with long-term memory in this course developed in collaboration with taught by its Co-Founder and CEO, Harrison Chase! Personal assistance and productivity tasks have become important use cases for agents. An important feature of an AI assistant, such as a coding or calendar assistant, is its ability to keep improving over time from its experience. Agent memory is the key capability that enables this. To add memory to an agent, you must first figure out what to store and what to retrieve when it is time to use the information. Additionally, you’ll have to decide when to update the stored information. For example, you might update in each iteration loop of the agent or perform updates in the background, with a helper agent. In this course, you will learn a mental framework to build agents with long-term memory. You'll create a useful email assistant that can respond, ignore, and notify using writing, scheduling, and memory-management tools. You’ll develop your agent's memory by adding facts to its memory store, provide examples to learn the user's preferences, and optimize system prompts to evolve instructions based on previous responses. In detail, you’ll: - Learn how the three types of memory--semantic, episodic, and procedural–and the two update mechanisms–via hot path and in the background–apply to your agents. - Build an email agent with writing, scheduling, and availability tools, along with a router that triages incoming email and handles it accordingly by ignoring, responding, or notifying the user. - Add tools to your email agent that allow it to operate on semantic memory by learning facts about the user, storing them in a long-term memory store, and searching over them in future interactions. - Incorporate episodic memory, in the form of few-shot examples, in the triage step of your agents to help them learn and update user preferences. - Add procedural memory as system prompts, optimized with feedback to improve the instructions the agent follows. Learn how to approach memory in agents, and start building agents with long-term memory with LangGraph! Please sign up here:

Andrew Ng

132,058 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

You can create an AI Agent that answers your email with a few clicks. 1. Go to ChatLLM ( 2. Click on AI Engineer 3. Select Create an AI Agent 4. Choose the Email Answering Agent ChatLLM will do the rest: it will code, test, and deploy the agent for you. You can also create a custom agent in English. The Agent Economy is coming (somebody should write a book and use this title.) We are going to see examples like this, times 1,000 in 2025. Just think about how many repetitive tasks you perform every day. Some of these tasks are involved enough that we couldn't automate them with pre-AI solutions. That's where we'll see agents explode, and I'm here for it.
0:35

You can create an AI Agent that answers your email with a few clicks. 1. Go to ChatLLM ( 2. Click on AI Engineer 3. Select Create an AI Agent 4. Choose the Email Answering Agent ChatLLM will do the rest: it will code, test, and deploy the agent for you. You can also create a custom agent in English. The Agent Economy is coming (somebody should write a book and use this title.) We are going to see examples like this, times 1,000 in 2025. Just think about how many repetitive tasks you perform every day. Some of these tasks are involved enough that we couldn't automate them with pre-AI solutions. That's where we'll see agents explode, and I'm here for it.

Santiago

79,974 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Imagine an AI application that can type anywhere you can and use the full context of what's on your screen. ​ This is the application we all deserve (at least if you have macOS.) ​ Check out Omnipilot. It's an app that works with every other macOS application and uses Claude Sonet 3.5 in the background—it also supports Gemini and GPT-4o. ​ ​ Here is the idea: ​ You can use the tool to ask questions about anything on your screen. Or you can use it to autocomplete the text you are typing. You don't need to copy and paste anymore or waste your time providing context to a model. ​ It sees what you see. It works right where you are. ​ That's pretty cool. ​ Here are a couple of cool examples: ​ • Use it to reply to an email • Use it in the terminal to autocomplete a command • Use it to finish a document • Use to send a message on Slack ​ AI at the system level is bonkers. You can read a ton more on their Product Hunt launch page: ​ ​ Thanks to the Omnipilot team for collaborating with me on this post!
0:29

Imagine an AI application that can type anywhere you can and use the full context of what's on your screen. ​ This is the application we all deserve (at least if you have macOS.) ​ Check out Omnipilot. It's an app that works with every other macOS application and uses Claude Sonet 3.5 in the background—it also supports Gemini and GPT-4o. ​ ​ Here is the idea: ​ You can use the tool to ask questions about anything on your screen. Or you can use it to autocomplete the text you are typing. You don't need to copy and paste anymore or waste your time providing context to a model. ​ It sees what you see. It works right where you are. ​ That's pretty cool. ​ Here are a couple of cool examples: ​ • Use it to reply to an email • Use it in the terminal to autocomplete a command • Use it to finish a document • Use to send a message on Slack ​ AI at the system level is bonkers. You can read a ton more on their Product Hunt launch page: ​ ​ Thanks to the Omnipilot team for collaborating with me on this post!

Santiago

72,306 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Introducing Clips - 100% free, open source, agent-native alternative to Loom Unlike Loom, agent's can fully understand Clips just from a URL. Every Clip comes with APIs and metadata for agents to explore their contents. Agents can "see and hear" anything in a Clip - not just transcripts, but everything visually in the video at any timestamp. Easily share bug reports, feedback, analyses, or anything else in a way that you can easily pass to agents to use to improve products, reports, or more. Also unlike Loom, you own the software, so no one can jack up prices on you suddenly like Loom did to us. Clips is made to be customized. The built-in agent can customize its own code, so you can personalize the app to your needs and workflows. This, in my opinion, is the future of software. Open-source, forkable, customizable with agents, to make your own personal version of anything. You can also import Looms just from a URL and upload videos as well. I got so sick of telling people "don't send me feedback as looms, I can't pass those to agents, I need text and images" that I had to just solve this once and for all. There's a free hosted version you can use too, or fork and self host yourself. Will link to both in the replies.
0:35

Introducing Clips - 100% free, open source, agent-native alternative to Loom Unlike Loom, agent's can fully understand Clips just from a URL. Every Clip comes with APIs and metadata for agents to explore their contents. Agents can "see and hear" anything in a Clip - not just transcripts, but everything visually in the video at any timestamp. Easily share bug reports, feedback, analyses, or anything else in a way that you can easily pass to agents to use to improve products, reports, or more. Also unlike Loom, you own the software, so no one can jack up prices on you suddenly like Loom did to us. Clips is made to be customized. The built-in agent can customize its own code, so you can personalize the app to your needs and workflows. This, in my opinion, is the future of software. Open-source, forkable, customizable with agents, to make your own personal version of anything. You can also import Looms just from a URL and upload videos as well. I got so sick of telling people "don't send me feedback as looms, I can't pass those to agents, I need text and images" that I had to just solve this once and for all. There's a free hosted version you can use too, or fork and self host yourself. Will link to both in the replies.

Steve (Builder.io)

233,123 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Andrej Karpathy just gave one of the clearest explanations I’ve heard for how people should be thinking about their Hermes agents. Not one agent. All of them. “Remove yourself as the bottleneck.” That line is much bigger than better prompting. Karpathy is talking about arranging your agents so they can operate with less human intervention, keep work moving longer, and accomplish far more from the relatively small amount of direction you give them. That should be the direction you’re pushing every Hermes agent you build. Your research agent shouldn’t need you to tell it what to search next every five minutes. Your monitoring agent shouldn’t depend on you remembering to check something. Your content agent shouldn’t stop after step one when the rest of the workflow is already known. Your development agent shouldn’t need you sitting there approving every tiny action. That doesn’t mean blindly making everything autonomous. It means deliberately looking at every place where you are still unnecessarily sitting in the loop. Give the agent a clear objective. Give it the tools it needs. Give it the right Skills, memory, files and project context. Define the boundaries. Define what success looks like. Give it a reason to start working, whether that’s a schedule, an event, a recurring task or another agent handing work off to it. Most importantly, define what it can handle itself and what actually requires you. That’s the shift. You’re no longer just building something you can chat with. You’re building an operating workflow that can continue doing useful work after you walk away. Karpathy later puts the goal even more directly: get “more agents running for longer periods of time without your involvement.” That might be one of the best north stars you can use for a serious Hermes setup. Because the number of agents you have means almost nothing by itself. You can have 20 Hermes agents and still personally drive every single action. Or you can have five well-designed agents researching, monitoring, organizing, building and reporting while your attention is somewhere else. So instead of asking: How many Hermes agents can I build? Start asking this about every agent you already have: What am I still doing that this agent could be doing without me? That’s where the leverage starts.
0:53

Andrej Karpathy just gave one of the clearest explanations I’ve heard for how people should be thinking about their Hermes agents. Not one agent. All of them. “Remove yourself as the bottleneck.” That line is much bigger than better prompting. Karpathy is talking about arranging your agents so they can operate with less human intervention, keep work moving longer, and accomplish far more from the relatively small amount of direction you give them. That should be the direction you’re pushing every Hermes agent you build. Your research agent shouldn’t need you to tell it what to search next every five minutes. Your monitoring agent shouldn’t depend on you remembering to check something. Your content agent shouldn’t stop after step one when the rest of the workflow is already known. Your development agent shouldn’t need you sitting there approving every tiny action. That doesn’t mean blindly making everything autonomous. It means deliberately looking at every place where you are still unnecessarily sitting in the loop. Give the agent a clear objective. Give it the tools it needs. Give it the right Skills, memory, files and project context. Define the boundaries. Define what success looks like. Give it a reason to start working, whether that’s a schedule, an event, a recurring task or another agent handing work off to it. Most importantly, define what it can handle itself and what actually requires you. That’s the shift. You’re no longer just building something you can chat with. You’re building an operating workflow that can continue doing useful work after you walk away. Karpathy later puts the goal even more directly: get “more agents running for longer periods of time without your involvement.” That might be one of the best north stars you can use for a serious Hermes setup. Because the number of agents you have means almost nothing by itself. You can have 20 Hermes agents and still personally drive every single action. Or you can have five well-designed agents researching, monitoring, organizing, building and reporting while your attention is somewhere else. So instead of asking: How many Hermes agents can I build? Start asking this about every agent you already have: What am I still doing that this agent could be doing without me? That’s where the leverage starts.

Hermes Release Watch

37,617 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

New short course: LLMs as Operating Systems: Agent Memory, created with Letta, and taught by its founders Charles Packer and Sarah Wooders. An LLM's input context window has limited space. Using a longer input context also costs more and results in slower processing. So, managing what's stored in this context window is important. In the innovative paper MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems, its authors (which include the instructors) proposed using an LLM agent to manage this context window. Their system uses a large persistent memory that stores everything that could be included in the input context, and an agent decides what is actually included. Take the example of building a chatbot that needs to remember what's been said earlier in a conversation (perhaps over many days of interaction with a user). As the conversation's length grows, the memory management agent will move information from the input context to a persistent searchable database; summarize information to keep relevant facts in the input context; and restore relevant conversation elements from further back in time. This allows a chatbot to keep what's currently most relevant in its input context memory to generate the next response. When I read the original MemGPT paper, I thought it was an innovative technique for handling memory for LLMs. The open-source Letta framework, which we'll use in this course, makes MemGPT easy to implement. It adds memory to your LLM agents and gives them transparent long-term memory. In detail, you’ll learn: - How to build an agent that can edit its own limited input context memory, using tools and multi-step reasoning - What is a memory hierarchy (an idea from computer operating systems, which use a cache to speed up memory access), and how these ideas apply to managing the LLM input context (where the input context window is a "cache" storing the most relevant information; and an agent decides what to move in and out of this to/from a larger persistent storage system) - How to implement multi-agent collaboration by letting different agents share blocks of memory This course will give you a sophisticated understanding of memory management for LLMs, which is important for chatbots having long conversations, and for complex agentic workflows. Please sign up here!
2:57

New short course: LLMs as Operating Systems: Agent Memory, created with Letta, and taught by its founders Charles Packer and Sarah Wooders. An LLM's input context window has limited space. Using a longer input context also costs more and results in slower processing. So, managing what's stored in this context window is important. In the innovative paper MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems, its authors (which include the instructors) proposed using an LLM agent to manage this context window. Their system uses a large persistent memory that stores everything that could be included in the input context, and an agent decides what is actually included. Take the example of building a chatbot that needs to remember what's been said earlier in a conversation (perhaps over many days of interaction with a user). As the conversation's length grows, the memory management agent will move information from the input context to a persistent searchable database; summarize information to keep relevant facts in the input context; and restore relevant conversation elements from further back in time. This allows a chatbot to keep what's currently most relevant in its input context memory to generate the next response. When I read the original MemGPT paper, I thought it was an innovative technique for handling memory for LLMs. The open-source Letta framework, which we'll use in this course, makes MemGPT easy to implement. It adds memory to your LLM agents and gives them transparent long-term memory. In detail, you’ll learn: - How to build an agent that can edit its own limited input context memory, using tools and multi-step reasoning - What is a memory hierarchy (an idea from computer operating systems, which use a cache to speed up memory access), and how these ideas apply to managing the LLM input context (where the input context window is a "cache" storing the most relevant information; and an agent decides what to move in and out of this to/from a larger persistent storage system) - How to implement multi-agent collaboration by letting different agents share blocks of memory This course will give you a sophisticated understanding of memory management for LLMs, which is important for chatbots having long conversations, and for complex agentic workflows. Please sign up here!

Andrew Ng

201,127 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 NEW: What if your inbox was just...handled? That's why we built Cora: the AI chief-of-staff for your email that only costs $15 / month—not $150k. Today, Cora is out of private beta and available publicly! 🚀 It does three things: - Screens your emails so you only see the 20% that matter - Drafts responses in your voice - Turns 80% of your inbox into a brief you can read in 30 seconds Cora learns you inside and out, so you never miss anything important. You can also chat or email with it like a human—it will remember everything you ask for. Cora has been wildly successful in its beta period, and it manages email for over 2,500 users—today it's your turn. Cora is available as a standalone product or included as part of an Every 📧 subscription along with all of the writing we publish, Spiral, Sparkle, and everything else we make. Give Cora your inbox and take back your life →
0:55

🚨 NEW: What if your inbox was just...handled? That's why we built Cora: the AI chief-of-staff for your email that only costs $15 / month—not $150k. Today, Cora is out of private beta and available publicly! 🚀 It does three things: - Screens your emails so you only see the 20% that matter - Drafts responses in your voice - Turns 80% of your inbox into a brief you can read in 30 seconds Cora learns you inside and out, so you never miss anything important. You can also chat or email with it like a human—it will remember everything you ask for. Cora has been wildly successful in its beta period, and it manages email for over 2,500 users—today it's your turn. Cora is available as a standalone product or included as part of an Every 📧 subscription along with all of the writing we publish, Spiral, Sparkle, and everything else we make. Give Cora your inbox and take back your life →

Dan Shipper

223,381 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."
4:16

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."

The Peel

51,632 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Can your agent finally edit your videos? Yup, it's a repo called video use, by Browser Use. You put the raw footage in a folder. Then Claude Code or Codex edits it. It removes the filler words, cuts the dead space, adds the subtitles, and renders the file. Then it checks its own cut points. Most creators use the same small set of edits in every video. That style stays in your head and in your hands. This repo puts it in a file that an agent can read. People ask for a full YouTube channel on day one. They see bad results, and they stop. Start with one format instead. - One founder loom into a 60 second launch video - 3 clips out of one podcast recording Then make the format a system. Then you operate the system, or you sell it. - Real estate agents need listing videos - Coaches need clips - Agencies need ad variations Manual installation with git clone is possible. For 95% of people, the agent is faster. Here's how i intalled it: - Gave the setup prompt to Claude Code with shell access - Let it read install.md - Installed the repo - Connected FFmpeg - Registered the skill
4:22

Can your agent finally edit your videos? Yup, it's a repo called video use, by Browser Use. You put the raw footage in a folder. Then Claude Code or Codex edits it. It removes the filler words, cuts the dead space, adds the subtitles, and renders the file. Then it checks its own cut points. Most creators use the same small set of edits in every video. That style stays in your head and in your hands. This repo puts it in a file that an agent can read. People ask for a full YouTube channel on day one. They see bad results, and they stop. Start with one format instead. - One founder loom into a 60 second launch video - 3 clips out of one podcast recording Then make the format a system. Then you operate the system, or you sell it. - Real estate agents need listing videos - Coaches need clips - Agencies need ad variations Manual installation with git clone is possible. For 95% of people, the agent is faster. Here's how i intalled it: - Gave the setup prompt to Claude Code with shell access - Let it read install.md - Installed the repo - Connected FFmpeg - Registered the skill

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

15,605 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Introducing the Clips chrome extension - the easiest way to send bug reports to agents with video, transcript, and browser debug info captured automatically. 100% free and open source. If you are like me and get tired of manually typing instructions to agents, attaching screenshots, pasting debug logs, and all of that, this might be your new favorite tool. With the Clips chrome extension, you can just click the Clips icon, hit record, and start talking. Visually demonstrate your issue, go through the flow, point out what’s broken. Clips will capture everything on your screen, plus network requests, browser logs, client errors, and all the details around them. And it redacts sensitive information. Then it gives you a link you can send to humans so they can play it and take a look. Or, more importantly, just give it to your agents by just pasting the URL to them. The link has special metadata for agents so just from the URL, the agent can pull all information from the clip automatically. No plugin or MCP server required. That means it can "see and hear" what’s in the video - read the transcript, grab snapshots at any timestamp, and inspect the logs and network requests that were shared with it. So whether you want to quickly demo an issue and send all that context to an agent, or get better bug reports from teammates, recording and sending Clips makes that super easy. Unlike expensive apps like Loom, this is all 100% free and open source. The framework that powers this, plus a bunch of other free applications, is open source too. You can just sign up and use it, or fork it and customize it to your needs. This, in my opinion, is the future of software. Rather than bloated SaaS that charges you a ton of money and still doesn’t even have the things you need, we get free open source canonical apps that you can fork and customize in any way you want. I'll link to all this stuff in the replies. If you try it, let me know your feedback.
1:27

Introducing the Clips chrome extension - the easiest way to send bug reports to agents with video, transcript, and browser debug info captured automatically. 100% free and open source. If you are like me and get tired of manually typing instructions to agents, attaching screenshots, pasting debug logs, and all of that, this might be your new favorite tool. With the Clips chrome extension, you can just click the Clips icon, hit record, and start talking. Visually demonstrate your issue, go through the flow, point out what’s broken. Clips will capture everything on your screen, plus network requests, browser logs, client errors, and all the details around them. And it redacts sensitive information. Then it gives you a link you can send to humans so they can play it and take a look. Or, more importantly, just give it to your agents by just pasting the URL to them. The link has special metadata for agents so just from the URL, the agent can pull all information from the clip automatically. No plugin or MCP server required. That means it can "see and hear" what’s in the video - read the transcript, grab snapshots at any timestamp, and inspect the logs and network requests that were shared with it. So whether you want to quickly demo an issue and send all that context to an agent, or get better bug reports from teammates, recording and sending Clips makes that super easy. Unlike expensive apps like Loom, this is all 100% free and open source. The framework that powers this, plus a bunch of other free applications, is open source too. You can just sign up and use it, or fork it and customize it to your needs. This, in my opinion, is the future of software. Rather than bloated SaaS that charges you a ton of money and still doesn’t even have the things you need, we get free open source canonical apps that you can fork and customize in any way you want. I'll link to all this stuff in the replies. If you try it, let me know your feedback.

Steve (Builder.io)

61,068 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

What is the “dark factory” that there’s so much talk about, in relation to software factories? dex, founder of HumanLayer explains: “You can imagine a car factory where it’s all robots building the cars, and they don’t have lights. There’s no humans. You walk in there, there’s no lights, there’s not even light switches. And in software, you can have mini loops that are dark in your thing: hey, if the code review agent comes back with a problem, you loop that back to the builder agent, it fixes it and comes back, and that’s a dark factory. You don’t need a human loop for that. But the full dark factory where you don’t read any code: yeah, it’s a good way to maximize your token utilization. If your belief is that ‘my job is to extract as much intelligence out of the machine as I can’, then you go token harder. And my take is token smarter: how do I get as much value out of AI as I can without having to turn the lights off, while still maintaining control and taste and judgment and understanding the system architecture?”
1:14

What is the “dark factory” that there’s so much talk about, in relation to software factories? dex, founder of HumanLayer explains: “You can imagine a car factory where it’s all robots building the cars, and they don’t have lights. There’s no humans. You walk in there, there’s no lights, there’s not even light switches. And in software, you can have mini loops that are dark in your thing: hey, if the code review agent comes back with a problem, you loop that back to the builder agent, it fixes it and comes back, and that’s a dark factory. You don’t need a human loop for that. But the full dark factory where you don’t read any code: yeah, it’s a good way to maximize your token utilization. If your belief is that ‘my job is to extract as much intelligence out of the machine as I can’, then you go token harder. And my take is token smarter: how do I get as much value out of AI as I can without having to turn the lights off, while still maintaining control and taste and judgment and understanding the system architecture?”

The Pragmatic Engineer

37,636 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Scrum is a cancer. There's nothing more bureaucratic, dysfunctional, and slow than a team that just wants to build software, but they are being forced to do it using Scrum. If you are stuck with this, here is a recommendation that will change your life: Go to connect your email, GitHub account, and the software you use to manage projects, and build a workflow that will brief you before every standup. Dimension is pretty incredible. You can literally write a prompt and have Dimension build an agent that will do the work in the background for you. Example: "Go to Linear and GitHub and write a summary of the tasks I completed last week. Organize them based on priority and effort. Send me an email with the results." Schedule this workflow to run 10 minutes before your Scrum meetings, and you'll get an email right before you need it. You can have AI now do all sorts of tasks for you: 1. Brief you before a meeting 2. Reply or handle cold emails 3. Take care of support messages 4. Research tasks for you And all of this can happen unprompted, in the background. Really awesome job from the team behind Dimension! Thanks to them for supporting my work by collaborating with me on this post.
0:28

Scrum is a cancer. There's nothing more bureaucratic, dysfunctional, and slow than a team that just wants to build software, but they are being forced to do it using Scrum. If you are stuck with this, here is a recommendation that will change your life: Go to connect your email, GitHub account, and the software you use to manage projects, and build a workflow that will brief you before every standup. Dimension is pretty incredible. You can literally write a prompt and have Dimension build an agent that will do the work in the background for you. Example: "Go to Linear and GitHub and write a summary of the tasks I completed last week. Organize them based on priority and effort. Send me an email with the results." Schedule this workflow to run 10 minutes before your Scrum meetings, and you'll get an email right before you need it. You can have AI now do all sorts of tasks for you: 1. Brief you before a meeting 2. Reply or handle cold emails 3. Take care of support messages 4. Research tasks for you And all of this can happen unprompted, in the background. Really awesome job from the team behind Dimension! Thanks to them for supporting my work by collaborating with me on this post.

Santiago

56,385 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Right now, I have a few dozen tools to automate my life. Every single thing that I do more than once every week is now a tool: either a Claude Code skill, a scheduled workflow, or an application. • I spend the time doing this once. • I schedule it. • I forget about it (or at least, try to) CREAO is one of the platforms I've used extensively for building some of these automations. They are partnering with me on this post. They are one of the only platforms where you can go from a conversation to a scheduled agent that quickly. This is how it works: 1. You describe the problem you want to solve 2. CREAO's agent builds the logic and executes it 3. You can iterate with the agent to improve the solution 4. When you are done, you turn that solution into a mini app 5. You can schedule that app to run any time you need it Something important: These agents are deterministic. They don't use an LLM to generate answers, so they will always return the same output given the same input. This is critical: when you're automating something that runs every Monday at 9 am, you need it to return the same result every time, not a "creative" answer.
5:00

Right now, I have a few dozen tools to automate my life. Every single thing that I do more than once every week is now a tool: either a Claude Code skill, a scheduled workflow, or an application. • I spend the time doing this once. • I schedule it. • I forget about it (or at least, try to) CREAO is one of the platforms I've used extensively for building some of these automations. They are partnering with me on this post. They are one of the only platforms where you can go from a conversation to a scheduled agent that quickly. This is how it works: 1. You describe the problem you want to solve 2. CREAO's agent builds the logic and executes it 3. You can iterate with the agent to improve the solution 4. When you are done, you turn that solution into a mini app 5. You can schedule that app to run any time you need it Something important: These agents are deterministic. They don't use an LLM to generate answers, so they will always return the same output given the same input. This is critical: when you're automating something that runs every Monday at 9 am, you need it to return the same result every time, not a "creative" answer.

Santiago

13,727 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

This agent relies on a marketplace of 2.8M+ specialized agents to complete a task. This is how I imagine the future of personal agents. Here is how this works: 1. Agentverse is a marketplace of agents 2. Anyone can build and publish an agent there 3. ASI:One is a personal agent with access to the marketplace 4. To solve a task, ASI:One finds the best agent for the job In other words: You have an agent that can solve pretty much *anything* because it knows how to outsource the work to a network of specialized agents. And you don't need to do any setup to get this working. The way ranking agents in the marketplace works is pretty cool: Fetch.ai, the company behind it, created an AgentRank algorithm that works much like Google's PageRank. Every time an agent calls another, it forms a connection. Over time, these connections build into a graph of who relies on whom. An agent that is frequently called by other reputable agents scores higher and surfaces higher in results. The end result here is that your agent will consistently use the best agents in the marketplace to accomplish a goal. You should give this a try: You don't need to pay or even register to try these agents. Thanks to the team for partnering with me on this post.
4:16

This agent relies on a marketplace of 2.8M+ specialized agents to complete a task. This is how I imagine the future of personal agents. Here is how this works: 1. Agentverse is a marketplace of agents 2. Anyone can build and publish an agent there 3. ASI:One is a personal agent with access to the marketplace 4. To solve a task, ASI:One finds the best agent for the job In other words: You have an agent that can solve pretty much *anything* because it knows how to outsource the work to a network of specialized agents. And you don't need to do any setup to get this working. The way ranking agents in the marketplace works is pretty cool: Fetch.ai, the company behind it, created an AgentRank algorithm that works much like Google's PageRank. Every time an agent calls another, it forms a connection. Over time, these connections build into a graph of who relies on whom. An agent that is frequently called by other reputable agents scores higher and surfaces higher in results. The end result here is that your agent will consistently use the best agents in the marketplace to accomplish a goal. You should give this a try: You don't need to pay or even register to try these agents. Thanks to the team for partnering with me on this post.

Santiago

18,715 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This is insane. An AI agent can run every boring job in outbound. We spent the last 6 months building ours. Here are my 8 favorite agents to build: Replies get sorted before we open the inbox. Campaigns go live from one command. Weak inboxes pull themselves out before they hurt a domain. Here are the agents behind it: 1. Reply Agent Reads every reply and drafts the response. A human reviews, edits, and sends. 2. Mailbox Health Agent Watches inbox and domain health. It predicts when you need new mailboxes, then buys and warms them. 3. Campaign Optimizer Agent Checks every live campaign every 6 hours. If 500+ leads were emailed and replies are under 4%, it tests new copy, replaces inboxes replying under 1%, and shifts sending to better hours. 4. Lead Qualification Agent Scores each lead by company size, industry, and tech stack. It enriches the record, updates your CRM, and only loads qualified leads into campaigns. High-priority prospect? You get a Slack ping. 5. Meeting Booking Agent Finds meeting requests inside replies. It books the slot, writes prep notes using the lead's background, sends reminders, and logs the outcome. 6. Pipeline Progression Agent Tracks opens, clicks, and website visits. It moves the CRM stage, triggers the next sequence, and creates a task when a lead shows real intent. 7. Copywriting Agent Writes cold emails and follow-ups in the campaign's voice. 8. Analytics Agent Watches campaign metrics in real time and explains what to fix in plain language. We built ours with custom code. Smartlead's SmartAgents let you build agents like these from a plain-English prompt, inside the platform where your campaigns already run. If you repeat an outbound task more than twice a week, that is an agent you have not built yet. Which one would you build first?
0:45

This is insane. An AI agent can run every boring job in outbound. We spent the last 6 months building ours. Here are my 8 favorite agents to build: Replies get sorted before we open the inbox. Campaigns go live from one command. Weak inboxes pull themselves out before they hurt a domain. Here are the agents behind it: 1. Reply Agent Reads every reply and drafts the response. A human reviews, edits, and sends. 2. Mailbox Health Agent Watches inbox and domain health. It predicts when you need new mailboxes, then buys and warms them. 3. Campaign Optimizer Agent Checks every live campaign every 6 hours. If 500+ leads were emailed and replies are under 4%, it tests new copy, replaces inboxes replying under 1%, and shifts sending to better hours. 4. Lead Qualification Agent Scores each lead by company size, industry, and tech stack. It enriches the record, updates your CRM, and only loads qualified leads into campaigns. High-priority prospect? You get a Slack ping. 5. Meeting Booking Agent Finds meeting requests inside replies. It books the slot, writes prep notes using the lead's background, sends reminders, and logs the outcome. 6. Pipeline Progression Agent Tracks opens, clicks, and website visits. It moves the CRM stage, triggers the next sequence, and creates a task when a lead shows real intent. 7. Copywriting Agent Writes cold emails and follow-ups in the campaign's voice. 8. Analytics Agent Watches campaign metrics in real time and explains what to fix in plain language. We built ours with custom code. Smartlead's SmartAgents let you build agents like these from a plain-English prompt, inside the platform where your campaigns already run. If you repeat an outbound task more than twice a week, that is an agent you have not built yet. Which one would you build first?

Hosun Chung

156,625 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Bash is all you need! Which is why I'm introducing my holiday project: just-bash just-bash is a pretty complete implementation of bash in TypeScript designed to be used as a bash tool by AI agents. Because it turns out agents love exploring data via shell scripts, even beyond coding. It comes with grep, sed, awk and the 99th percentile features that an agent like Claude Code or Cursor would use. In fact, Claude Code can use it for secure bash execution. In the package - A bash-tool for AI SDK - A binary for use by yourself or your coding agents - An overlay filesystem to feed files to your agent securely - A Vercel Sandbox compatible API, so you can quickly upgrade to a real VM if you need to run binaries - An example AI agent that explores the just-bash code base using just-bash - I imported the Oils shell bash compatibility suite and just-bash passes a very good chunk What is interesting about this codebase: It was essentially entirely written by Opus 4.5. Coding agents love bash and they are good at reproducing it. They are also great at text-book recursive descent parsers and AST tweet-walk interpreters. That said, it is, like, a lot of code and I didn't read it all 😅. This is very much a hack, but it also seems to be _really_ useful. I haven't really found anything agents want to use that it doesn't support and it's fast and secure (caveats apply). It doesn't have write access to your computer and the filesystem is given a root that the agent cannot escape from. Find it at Related: Our recent blog post how we migrated our data analysis agent to bash tools and achieved incredible quality improvements The video shows the example agent investigating the just-bash code base
1:47

Bash is all you need! Which is why I'm introducing my holiday project: just-bash just-bash is a pretty complete implementation of bash in TypeScript designed to be used as a bash tool by AI agents. Because it turns out agents love exploring data via shell scripts, even beyond coding. It comes with grep, sed, awk and the 99th percentile features that an agent like Claude Code or Cursor would use. In fact, Claude Code can use it for secure bash execution. In the package - A bash-tool for AI SDK - A binary for use by yourself or your coding agents - An overlay filesystem to feed files to your agent securely - A Vercel Sandbox compatible API, so you can quickly upgrade to a real VM if you need to run binaries - An example AI agent that explores the just-bash code base using just-bash - I imported the Oils shell bash compatibility suite and just-bash passes a very good chunk What is interesting about this codebase: It was essentially entirely written by Opus 4.5. Coding agents love bash and they are good at reproducing it. They are also great at text-book recursive descent parsers and AST tweet-walk interpreters. That said, it is, like, a lot of code and I didn't read it all 😅. This is very much a hack, but it also seems to be _really_ useful. I haven't really found anything agents want to use that it doesn't support and it's fast and secure (caveats apply). It doesn't have write access to your computer and the filesystem is given a root that the agent cannot escape from. Find it at Related: Our recent blog post how we migrated our data analysis agent to bash tools and achieved incredible quality improvements The video shows the example agent investigating the just-bash code base

Malte Ubl

125,326 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten