Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Burlington, Maine Mayor just released a strong statement fully backing her police department. She confirmed officers used reasonable force against the local terrorists who rioted during the ICE raid. Anyone who watched the bodycam footage and other videos knows this is 100% the correct call. The officers acted professionally...

48,455 views • 27 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

My Statement on Conditions for the Use of Firearms by Police Officers I have seen debates, reactions, and expressions regarding my recent statement on the use of firearms by police officers. My statement was made contextually and consciously with clarity of mind based on the express provisions of the law. No leader, scholar, jurist, journalist, blogger, or opinion shaper has challenged me on the law. At my age, position, and experience, I cannot utter statements that are not supported by the Constitution and the law. Throughout my career, I have never, in my conduct or utterances, found myself on the wrong side of the law. Indeed the Sixth Schedule of the National Police Service Act, in Paragraph B(1), provides the conditions for use of firearms by the Police as follows: 1.Protecting the lives of officers or civilians 2.Self-defense against imminent threats of death or serious injury protection through justified force 4.Preventing the escape of felony suspects from lawful custody I ask all those who are spreading misinformation, disinformation, and fake news to challenge me on the law. Those who are saying I issued an order to the police should show where the order is. A mere restatement of the law as it exists cannot amount to giving an order to the police. The Police are mandated by law to operate within the constitutional framework, the statutes, and the departmental standing orders. In any case, I have no constitutional powers to give such orders; instead, I have a duty to support the police and to formulate policy recommendations to aid the application of law in the enforcement of law and order. Our police officers who are attacked by robbers, rioters, and arsonists—who have torched police stations, stolen rifles, burnt suspects alive, and burnt property worth millions of shillings, including courts —cannot be left helpless when they have been given the authority by the Constitution and the law to defend themselves, the citizens, and their property. The law is in black and white.

KIPCHUMBA MURKOMEN, E.G.H

213,277 views • 1 year ago

In the wake of the Manchester Airport incident, where an armed officer was suspended after a video showed him using force during an arrest, the rush to judgment is not only unjust but perilous for public safety. The full video release, which clearly shows the officer being violently assaulted before responding, underscores a critical issue. The growing trend of scrutinising police actions without considering the full context or immediate threats faced by officers. The video footage from Manchester Airport reveals a chaotic and dangerous situation. The officer dazed after being punched in the head three times, found himself in a fight for survival. The aggressive behaviour of the suspect necessitated a rapid and forceful response. According to principles governing police use of force, officers are entitled to defend themselves and others from imminent harm. When under assault, the officer’s priority was to neutralise the threat swiftly, a decision made in split seconds and under extreme duress. Critics argue that the force used was excessive, but it's crucial to understand the legal framework. Armed officers are trained to respond proportionately to threats. In situations where their own lives or the lives of others are at immediate risk, what may appear excessive in hindsight can be entirely justified. The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is investigating the incident, considering all circumstances, including the severity of the assault on the officer and the perceived threat. This incident is symptomatic of a broader, troubling trend. The tendency to vilify police officers without due process. Immediate public outrage, often fuelled by incomplete footage or social media snippets, leads to premature judgments and severe consequences for the officers involved. This witch hunt mentality not only demoralises the police force but also emboldens criminals who see a weakened, scrutinised police presence as an opportunity. The witch hunt against police is not an isolated phenomenon. It is part of a larger strategy employed by certain groups to manipulate public perception and cry wolf. Consider the case of Bailey and the Syrian bully in Huddersfield, where a fabricated narrative was constructed around the alleged bullying of a Syrian boy. The ensuing media frenzy and public outcry were based on misleading information, weaponising the boy's background to generate sympathy, and vilifying the supposed aggressor. This tactic is being used again in the Manchester Airport incident, where Muslim groups are quick to label the police response as racist and ignoring the violent assault on the officer. By crying wolf and manipulating public sentiment, these groups undermine legitimate law enforcement efforts and create an environment where officers are hesitant to act, fearing backlash and accusations of bias. When police officers are hesitant to act out of fear of suspension or legal repercussions, public safety is compromised. Officers must have the confidence that they can perform their duties without facing undue persecution. The constant second-guessing of their split-second decisions can lead to hesitation, endangering both officers and the public they are sworn to protect. The Manchester Airport incident should serve as a reminder of the complexities and dangers of police work. Instead of rushing to condemn, we should ensure that our officers are supported and that their actions are judged fairly, considering the full context and the immediate threats they face. The witch hunt against police officers, often fuelled by manipulative tactics and false accusations, not only undermines their ability to protect us but also threatens the very fabric of public safety. It's time to stand by our police and ensure they have the support and respect they need to do their jobs effectively.

MarXmeN

26,043 views • 1 year ago

El Paso PD Finds Use of Force Lawful in Resisting Arrest Incident On April 1, 2026, in Central El Paso, Texas, El Paso police officers executed an arrest warrant at a house in the 600 block of East Rio Grande Avenue for 28-year-old Kelcee Renee Hufford. She faced charges of assault causing bodily injury involving family violence, stemming from a dispute with her roommate over rent on March 31. A cellphone video recorded by Hufford’s mother, which went viral on social media around April 3, showed a chaotic scene inside the home. Officers attempted to handcuff Hufford as she resisted. One officer delivered a closed-fist punch to her face while she was pinned down. Hufford continued struggling before officers subdued and arrested her. She was booked into the El Paso County Detention Facility on family violence/assault and resisting arrest charges with bonds set at $3,000 and $1,000, respectively. Hufford was released the same day on a personal recognizance bond. The El Paso Police Department initially acknowledged the video in a statement, noting that force was used during the apprehension and that the Internal Affairs Division would review the incident per policy. On April 10, 2026, Chief Peter Pacillas held a press conference at police headquarters in Central El Paso. He stated that Internal Affairs and a Use of Force Discipline Review Board (six officers and six civilians) investigated and determined the officers’ actions, including the punch, were within department policy and the law. Chief Pacillas supported his officers, saying the punch constituted a justified use of force against active resistance during a violent offense warrant. “The officer acted within the law and policy... that’s what I expect my officers to do,” he added, emphasizing that resistance turns the encounter into a fight regardless of the suspect’s gender or size. #ElPasoPD #ElPasoArrest #CentralElPaso #UseOfForce #ViralArrestVideo #ChiefPacillas #FamilyViolence #ResistingArrest #ElPasoPolice #police #cops #crime #policia #polizei

Police Incidents

11,974 views • 2 months ago

VIDEO: Woman who threw speeding ticket toward Hurst Police officer brings complaint to city council FOX 4 NEWS ... HURST, Texas - A Hurst woman and the local police department are telling different sides of a story involving a traffic stop and a thrown speeding ticket. On Jan. 16, Taneisha Thompson was stopped by a Hurst police officer after allegedly speeding in a school zone. Hurst Police released body camera footage of the incident on Tuesday. In the video, an officer issues Thompson a traffic citation after a brief conversation. Thompson is seen throwing the ticket back at the officer, who then placed Thompson under arrest with the help of another officer. Officers pulled Thompson out of her car and onto the ground before arresting her. Thompson's child was present in the passenger seat of the vehicle at the time of the incident. Thompson has hired civil rights attorney Lee Merritt as she considers legal action against the Hurst Police Department. She says she suffered a black eye, a lip injury that required stitches and several bruises on her body from the incident. Thompson read a statement to reporters on Tuesday evening during a press conference before sharing her story with Hurst City Council. "I am here today because this is bigger than me—this is about all of us. It is about ensuring de-escalation, about prioritizing the safety of every citizen, so that no one else endures what I did. I am deeply grateful for all the support I have received from around the world—this is a call for justice, for humanity, and for safety. I will not be silenced," part of Thompson's statement read. Merritt answered questions during the presser. When asked about Thompson's throwing of the ticket, Merritt said: "I tell my clients, I tell the public in general, it’s not best to litigate a case on the side of the road. If you’re upset about a police encounter, hold your peace, hire an attorney, file a complaint with the police department later." He also stated: "I let the public know, just because this is the law, that you actually have every right to be rude to law enforcement. Not best practice, but you have every right to be rude." Hurst Police are standing by the officer. "Corporal Morgan acted in full accordance with the law and with our department’s policies and the department stands firmly behind his actions," Hurst Police Chief Billy Keadle said. The department conducted an investigation into the incident after Thompson filed a formal complaint claiming excessive use of force. The investigation determined the claims were unfounded. Alex del Carmen, a criminologist at Tarleton State University, viewed the footage and said the officer's actions were lawful. "What I said after reviewing the entire footage was that the woman was very disrespectful of the office during the entire exchange. Further, that the officer, up to the point of handing the ticket to her, was very respectful, professional and showed restraint," del Carmen said. "However, when the woman threw the citation out the window, the officer had the choice of either giving her another citation for loitering, ignoring it, or asking another officer to step in. Instead, he chose to issue a verbal command for the woman to get out of the vehicle, and she refused." "At that point, the officer used physical force. Although this was awful, it is lawful, for the woman refused to get out of the vehicle and ignored the officer’s commands."

David Sentendrey

65,637 views • 3 months ago

A teen who was assaulted and slammed by a Warren police officer during booking has filed a $50 million lawsuit. The lawsuit was filed this week by Fieger Law. Matthew Rodriguez, 48, an officer with 14 years on the force, was charged Friday with assault and battery charges. Warren police announced Monday that he had been fired According to the lawsuit, the teen suffered physical and mental damage due to excessive force, and the city of Warren failed to properly train the officer. "Officer Matthew, with the specific intent to intimidate and/or harass Plaintiff, as a result of his race and/or ethnicity, caused physical contact with Plaintiff by striking him in the head and/or face with a fist and pulling him off the ground by his hair," the lawsuit reads. The lawsuit also says that the two other officers in the video failed to intervene and help the teen. “This is one of the most flagrant cases of police misconduct I’ve seen in my entire career as a trial attorney. The sheer violence and disregard for human life that these three officers showed is despicable and cannot be tolerated," said James Harrington of Fieger Law. The incident happened early this week at the Warren police department. The video shows the officer punching and grabbing the 19-year-old by his locs before slamming & launching him into his cell. Warren Police Commissioner Bill Dwyer says an investigation was launched after the two officers in the video stepped up and told a supervisor about the incident. One officer was telling Rodriguez "That's enough" multiple times in an attempt to make the officer stop, Dwyer said. At first, they did not know why the officer was attacking him. Within a week, the officer was arrested, charged, and put on unpaid administrative leave, said Dwyer. The officer in the video also was out of policy and was not wearing bodycam. The officer has a lengthy history of alleged accessive force. He currently has two pending lawsuits.

Music is Life

1,890,928 views • 9 months ago

🚨BREAKING NEWS🚨 I have it from credible anonymous sources that NYS Attorney General Tish James Office is interfering in the investigation of the NYPD shooting death of Win Rozario. Here are the facts: • NYPD Force Investigation Division investigated the shooting and cleared NYPD Officers Alongi & Cianfrocco, deeming it a justified shooting. • Queens District Attorney Melinda Katz Officer investigated the incident and found no criminality on the officers part. • NYC CCRB investigators reviewed the incident and found the officers did NOTHING wrong. • The CCRB’s board then in an eyebrow raising decision disagreed with their own investigators and are calling for the officers to be TERMINATED. • Jessica S. Tisch Jessica Tisch then informs the NYPD to move forward with a Department trial while the officers are still awaiting the results of their 3rd separate criminal investigation from NYS Attorney General’s Office. • After being cleared criminally 2x’s from both the NYPD and the Queens District Attorney’s office these officers are still facing potential criminal charges from the NYS AG’s Office as well as now administrative for the charges from the CCRB board. The NYPD is facing immense political pressure to fire these officers. I am now being told that the NYS Attorney General’s Office concluded their investigation months ago and the investigators at the NYS AG’s office cleared these officers of any criminality but the leadership of the AG’s office is not happy with that result and is seeking to go against the determination of their own investigators and charge these officers criminally. If what I am being told is true it is more than likely that the AG’s office also pressured the CCRB board to against the determination of their own investigators to achieve a political goal. Two NYPD officers, freedom & career are being sacrificed to appease the anti police mob and it’s the states top law enforcement official who is doing it. The NYS AG’s must release the results of the original investigation NOW and end this witch hunt. You can view the officers body camera here President Donald J. Trump Attorney General Pamela Bondi U.S. Department of Justice NYC PBA National Police Association National Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) Betsy Brantner Smith Mayor Eric Adams Kaz Daughtry NYPD Chief of Department Sam E. Antar New York Post Fox News NEWSMAX Redacted

John D. Macari Jr. 🇺🇸🗽

12,001 views • 9 months ago

•Gauteng Traffic Officer faces criminal charges following heated confrontation with Ekurhuleni Metro Police A police officer from the Gauteng Traffic Police is facing criminal charges after being captured on cell phone video during a heated argument with Ekurhuleni metro police officers. A case of intimidation, common assault, grievous bodily harm, defeating the ends of justice, and interfering with police duties has been opened against the officer. The male traffic officer is seen swearing and making obscene gestures at a female EMPD officer, calling them illiterate and a clown. He also told the EMPD officers that he would take the pension fund of the EMPD officials. The EMPD officials had stopped a female motorist, who then called the traffic officer to assist her. The motorist was driving a vehicle with a foreign number plate. The EMPD officers had to stop the vehicle for inspection when the woman motorist reached out to the Gauteng Traffic officer, who came running. Upon arriving at the scene, the Gauteng Traffic officer started insulting the officers and interfering with the duties of the metro police in Ekurhuleni. This prompted the Member of the Mayoral Committee of Community (MMC) for Safety, Sizakele Masuku, to condemn the incident. MMC Masuku condemned the intimidation of the EMPD officers by a Gauteng Traffic Police member. It is alleged that this is not the first incident of this nature involving this Gauteng Traffic officer, and more preliminary investigations are underway. The MMC further reiterated that no officer is above the law and such behavior is unacceptable. She called on officers to uphold all the rules of law. The so-called "Super Sheriff" of Gauteng will not stop the work of the EMPD or intimidate its officers. “He is not the best cop ever because a law enforcement officer would never conduct himself in such an unlawful manner. Our duty is to enforce the law. The Super Sheriff is not above the law." MMC Masuku said the Gauteng Traffic official has two previous cases of assault which are under investigation. He is also accused of beating people on the streets. Watch: MMC CITY OF EKURHULENI responds…

Yusuf Abramjee

187,823 views • 1 year ago