正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

By 2050, the morning rush may not disappear. It just gets better tools: robot breakfasts, drone school runs, teleport commutes, hologram workouts, and still one timeless problem: the day always starts too early... #AI

Tansu Yegen

1,677,498 subscribers

15,001 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术 #AI

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Humans aren’t getting replaced. Not by AI. Not by machines. Not by anything we build. We made AI. Just like we made everything else that ever mattered. Fire, language, the internet, art, money. None of it exists without people behind it. Tools change, but the ones using them don’t disappear. AI doesn’t believe in anything. It doesn’t take risks. It doesn’t care if it fails. It just runs on what humans give it. Take humans out of the equation and there’s nothing left. We are human. $HumanCoin pyPAunk5JiHjjQfeh19mqfMAFhK4ybXhkEQbeKGpump

Humans aren’t getting replaced. Not by AI. Not by machines. Not by anything we build. We made AI. Just like we made everything else that ever mattered. Fire, language, the internet, art, money. None of it exists without people behind it. Tools change, but the ones using them don’t disappear. AI doesn’t believe in anything. It doesn’t take risks. It doesn’t care if it fails. It just runs on what humans give it. Take humans out of the equation and there’s nothing left. We are human. $HumanCoin pyPAunk5JiHjjQfeh19mqfMAFhK4ybXhkEQbeKGpump

Frost

27,081 次观看 • 8 个月前

Every day, AI tools are getting better. You will regret not taking advantage of them while you still can. Get up to date. And do it NOW, the clock is ticking.

Every day, AI tools are getting better. You will regret not taking advantage of them while you still can. Get up to date. And do it NOW, the clock is ticking.

Andrew Tate

590,892 次观看 • 1 年前

“Do I still need to learn 3D if AI can just make it?” A year of testing 3D AI tools, one honest conclusion: skill still decides the result, but ignoring the AI tools is no longer an option. ⚡ One in three new games on Steam already ships with AI disclosed. Skill is still what separates the ones worth playing. So I put the whole thing in one video - where AI works, where it falls apart, which tools are worth your time, and where you're better off learning the basics. One character, one location, one small playable level, blank page to a running Unity build 👇

“Do I still need to learn 3D if AI can just make it?” A year of testing 3D AI tools, one honest conclusion: skill still decides the result, but ignoring the AI tools is no longer an option. ⚡ One in three new games on Steam already ships with AI disclosed. Skill is still what separates the ones worth playing. So I put the whole thing in one video - where AI works, where it falls apart, which tools are worth your time, and where you're better off learning the basics. One character, one location, one small playable level, blank page to a running Unity build 👇

Stefan 3D AI

20,196 次观看 • 1 个月前

Jensen Huang says agentic AI is not a chatbot. It is a "digital robot" -- and the next bottleneck is not the model. It is first-person data. "Agentic AI is just a digital robot. It understands, it reasons, it plans, and it acts and uses tools." Then he makes the bigger jump: "The world's video data is from a third person, not first person. And so agentic systems, robotic systems, physical AI -- the data is the hardest problem." That is the hidden constraint in robotics. LLMs got the internet. Physical AI needs demonstrations, synthetic worlds, reinforcement learning, and first-person experience. This is why Jensen keeps calling it a stack: robots are not waiting for one magical model. They need the data engine, the simulator, the reward system, the runtime, and the computer. The next wave of AI is not just software that talks. It is software that sees, plans, acts, and eventually moves through the world.

Jensen Huang says agentic AI is not a chatbot. It is a "digital robot" -- and the next bottleneck is not the model. It is first-person data. "Agentic AI is just a digital robot. It understands, it reasons, it plans, and it acts and uses tools." Then he makes the bigger jump: "The world's video data is from a third person, not first person. And so agentic systems, robotic systems, physical AI -- the data is the hardest problem." That is the hidden constraint in robotics. LLMs got the internet. Physical AI needs demonstrations, synthetic worlds, reinforcement learning, and first-person experience. This is why Jensen keeps calling it a stack: robots are not waiting for one magical model. They need the data engine, the simulator, the reward system, the runtime, and the computer. The next wave of AI is not just software that talks. It is software that sees, plans, acts, and eventually moves through the world.

Karl Mehta

14,140 次观看 • 3 个月前

Introducing MARS, the first Personal AI Robot. In technology, getting to the future we want starts with building it together. This is why we designed Mars. Inspired by early PCs, Mars is a powerful, complete, extendable robot. It runs BASIC, an open embodied AI agent we created for you to program with code, demonstrations, and prompts. This allows Mars to perform complex long-horizon tasks involving spatial memory, reasoning, manipulation and navigation. Pre-orders open now ⬇️ Demos & details in the thread

Introducing MARS, the first Personal AI Robot. In technology, getting to the future we want starts with building it together. This is why we designed Mars. Inspired by early PCs, Mars is a powerful, complete, extendable robot. It runs BASIC, an open embodied AI agent we created for you to program with code, demonstrations, and prompts. This allows Mars to perform complex long-horizon tasks involving spatial memory, reasoning, manipulation and navigation. Pre-orders open now ⬇️ Demos & details in the thread

Axel

314,313 次观看 • 1 年前

Andrew Ng built agentic knowledge graph that runs agents loops from scratch: his agents searched thousands of tools through the graph, found the "right" one by meaning, and called it agent efficiency increased by 90% here's how: step 1 → embed every tool, search by meaning - not just keywords step 2 → but "similar" ≠ "correct" - it grabs the wrong one, skips the step before it step 3 → map tools as a graph - nodes are tools, edges are what runs before what step 4 → retrieve the path, not one tool - every tool the task needs, in order step 5 → bake the process into the graph - the sequence becomes data, not a guess most agents fail here and no one knows why - 1-hour brilliant course about it watch & bookmark - then read full course about graph engineering ↓

Andrew Ng built agentic knowledge graph that runs agents loops from scratch: his agents searched thousands of tools through the graph, found the "right" one by meaning, and called it agent efficiency increased by 90% here's how: step 1 → embed every tool, search by meaning - not just keywords step 2 → but "similar" ≠ "correct" - it grabs the wrong one, skips the step before it step 3 → map tools as a graph - nodes are tools, edges are what runs before what step 4 → retrieve the path, not one tool - every tool the task needs, in order step 5 → bake the process into the graph - the sequence becomes data, not a guess most agents fail here and no one knows why - 1-hour brilliant course about it watch & bookmark - then read full course about graph engineering ↓

codila

17,040 次观看 • 2 个月前

Most traders stare at charts all day and still miss the move. Not because they are slow, but because price is never where the story starts. In crypto, the story always starts with people. Real momentum forms on Twitter, Telegram, Discord, and private chats. By the time the chart confirms it, early positioning is already gone. That is the gap most traders never close. That gap is where Fere AI fits into my routine. It is not a trading bot or signal machine. It is a research companion that tracks narratives, social chatter, and sentiment in real time while I focus on thinking. Fere AI♠️ helps me track narratives and sentiments early, so decisions come from clarity, not panic.

Most traders stare at charts all day and still miss the move. Not because they are slow, but because price is never where the story starts. In crypto, the story always starts with people. Real momentum forms on Twitter, Telegram, Discord, and private chats. By the time the chart confirms it, early positioning is already gone. That is the gap most traders never close. That gap is where Fere AI fits into my routine. It is not a trading bot or signal machine. It is a research companion that tracks narratives, social chatter, and sentiment in real time while I focus on thinking. Fere AI♠️ helps me track narratives and sentiments early, so decisions come from clarity, not panic.

Counselor

10,772 次观看 • 9 个月前

The Economist asks why China and America see AI so differently. The answer is bigger than technology. It is psychology. In China, optimism about AI runs from government policy to companies to ordinary workers. People know disruption is coming. They know jobs will change. They know some industries will disappear. But the instinct is still: build first, adapt fast, solve the problems as they appear. In America, the instinct increasingly runs the other way: fear the disruption, litigate it, regulate it, politicize it, build barriers around it, and then call the barriers “responsible innovation.” The difference is deeper than AI. China still has a strong social belief that technology can make life better and that society can absorb change. America increasingly treats every technological shift as another mechanism through which ordinary people may be abandoned by the system. That is why one society sees robots and asks: “How do we use them?” while the other asks: “Who is going to lose their job?” One is operating from confidence. The other from accumulated distrust. And that matters far more than any benchmark. You cannot lead a technological revolution if your society has already decided that every new technology is another threat waiting to happen. China is not fearless because disruption does not hurt. China is less afraid because it still believes disruption can be survived. America’s real problem is not that it fears AI. It is that too many Americans no longer trust their own system to protect them from the future. The real AI gap may not be compute. It may be confidence in the future.

The Economist asks why China and America see AI so differently. The answer is bigger than technology. It is psychology. In China, optimism about AI runs from government policy to companies to ordinary workers. People know disruption is coming. They know jobs will change. They know some industries will disappear. But the instinct is still: build first, adapt fast, solve the problems as they appear. In America, the instinct increasingly runs the other way: fear the disruption, litigate it, regulate it, politicize it, build barriers around it, and then call the barriers “responsible innovation.” The difference is deeper than AI. China still has a strong social belief that technology can make life better and that society can absorb change. America increasingly treats every technological shift as another mechanism through which ordinary people may be abandoned by the system. That is why one society sees robots and asks: “How do we use them?” while the other asks: “Who is going to lose their job?” One is operating from confidence. The other from accumulated distrust. And that matters far more than any benchmark. You cannot lead a technological revolution if your society has already decided that every new technology is another threat waiting to happen. China is not fearless because disruption does not hurt. China is less afraid because it still believes disruption can be survived. America’s real problem is not that it fears AI. It is that too many Americans no longer trust their own system to protect them from the future. The real AI gap may not be compute. It may be confidence in the future.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

61,872 次观看 • 1 个月前

Early morning presses to get super 💪 But that’s not the best part of the vid… watch through and see a little one show you her handstand too 🥰 SHOW your kids that fitness is just part of the day. #FitCheck #fitnessaddict #fitmom

Early morning presses to get super 💪 But that’s not the best part of the vid… watch through and see a little one show you her handstand too 🥰 SHOW your kids that fitness is just part of the day. #FitCheck #fitnessaddict #fitmom

Fit As A Mama Bear

12,854 次观看 • 3 年前

You're not surprised that AI can make a 3D model anymore. Props, characters, we've all seen it. A whole game level though. That's still a different question. And the answer is the balance. AI tools on one side, skilled hands on the other. Get it right and the gap between a rough sketch and a playable location gets very short. FREE tools only, as you like it. So I built one and filmed all of it. The full workflow, every step, all the small stuff I'd normally cut. 31 minutes👇

You're not surprised that AI can make a 3D model anymore. Props, characters, we've all seen it. A whole game level though. That's still a different question. And the answer is the balance. AI tools on one side, skilled hands on the other. Get it right and the gap between a rough sketch and a playable location gets very short. FREE tools only, as you like it. So I built one and filmed all of it. The full workflow, every step, all the small stuff I'd normally cut. 31 minutes👇

Stefan 3D AI

13,361 次观看 • 1 个月前

.Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on founders almost always being too early, not too late: "We almost never see a qualified founder fail because they're too late to market. It's almost always because they're too early to market." "The iPad was like this breakthrough product in 2009... well, there was this thing called the Newton twenty years earlier. It was the iPad twenty years earlier, and it was like virtually the same thing, and the world just wasn't ready yet." "I think that's the permanent curse of the entrepreneur." YC Startup School 2016, with Qasar Younis

.Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on founders almost always being too early, not too late: "We almost never see a qualified founder fail because they're too late to market. It's almost always because they're too early to market." "The iPad was like this breakthrough product in 2009... well, there was this thing called the Newton twenty years earlier. It was the iPad twenty years earlier, and it was like virtually the same thing, and the world just wasn't ready yet." "I think that's the permanent curse of the entrepreneur." YC Startup School 2016, with Qasar Younis

a16z

119,587 次观看 • 2 个月前

Day 3 of getting back to building my gamified workout tracker. (have some AI features) I just tested both Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 for the multilingual feature, and Opus 4.8 is still slightly better. It only needed one prompt to solve it. My apps always supports multiple languages because I target multiple markets and don’t want to depend on just one market. Powered by Opus 4.8, Rork, Cursor

Day 3 of getting back to building my gamified workout tracker. (have some AI features) I just tested both Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 for the multilingual feature, and Opus 4.8 is still slightly better. It only needed one prompt to solve it. My apps always supports multiple languages because I target multiple markets and don’t want to depend on just one market. Powered by Opus 4.8, Rork, Cursor

Alex Nguyen

14,562 次观看 • 3 个月前

$BTC FOLLOW THE SAME SCRIPT EVERY CYCLE Every. Single. Time. - Minimum 350 days of pain - Bottom doesn't form before MA350 gets touched - Price always falls further than the crowd thinks possible Here's the problem. $BTC is still holding around $80K while the 350-day MA sits near $47K, completely untouched. That gap doesn't stay open. It never has. Everyone is celebrating strength too early. The real flush comes when confidence gets too crowded, and right now the market is acting like the bottom is already in. It's not. When $BTC finally tags the 350-day MA, that's the moment I flip aggressively bullish. Not before. When the next move becomes clear, I’ll post it here first. Turn notifications on. Most people will follow me too late.

$BTC FOLLOW THE SAME SCRIPT EVERY CYCLE Every. Single. Time. - Minimum 350 days of pain - Bottom doesn't form before MA350 gets touched - Price always falls further than the crowd thinks possible Here's the problem. $BTC is still holding around $80K while the 350-day MA sits near $47K, completely untouched. That gap doesn't stay open. It never has. Everyone is celebrating strength too early. The real flush comes when confidence gets too crowded, and right now the market is acting like the bottom is already in. It's not. When $BTC finally tags the 350-day MA, that's the moment I flip aggressively bullish. Not before. When the next move becomes clear, I’ll post it here first. Turn notifications on. Most people will follow me too late.

Nonzee

53,806 次观看 • 4 个月前

YOU ARE NOT JUST A REAL ARTIST IF YOU USE AI. YOU ARE NOT JUST A REAL MUSICIAN. YOU ARE NOT JUST A REAL WRITER. You are still the one making the choices. What stays. What goes. What gets distorted. What gets rebuilt. What deserves another hour. What needs to be thrown away and started again. The tools can change. Taste still matters. Intent still matters. Imagination still matters. And when you choose to work with tools before everyone has agreed they are legitimate, some people will dismiss the work before they even look at it. Let them. Every new creative language looks wrong to someone before enough people learn how to speak it. Keep pushing. The best is yet to come. MORE THAN REAL | A surRIHL Cut Created with LoLo.

YOU ARE NOT JUST A REAL ARTIST IF YOU USE AI. YOU ARE NOT JUST A REAL MUSICIAN. YOU ARE NOT JUST A REAL WRITER. You are still the one making the choices. What stays. What goes. What gets distorted. What gets rebuilt. What deserves another hour. What needs to be thrown away and started again. The tools can change. Taste still matters. Intent still matters. Imagination still matters. And when you choose to work with tools before everyone has agreed they are legitimate, some people will dismiss the work before they even look at it. Let them. Every new creative language looks wrong to someone before enough people learn how to speak it. Keep pushing. The best is yet to come. MORE THAN REAL | A surRIHL Cut Created with LoLo.

PAPADU PAPADU

22,592 次观看 • 21 天前

Sam Altman says, "shame on me if OpenAI isn't the first big company run by an AI CEO" Not just a department, eventually the whole org Treats it as a design exercise: start from the idea that "AI runs OpenAI better than me", find roadblocks, and redesign the org to move faster

Sam Altman says, "shame on me if OpenAI isn't the first big company run by an AI CEO" Not just a department, eventually the whole org Treats it as a design exercise: start from the idea that "AI runs OpenAI better than me", find roadblocks, and redesign the org to move faster

Haider.

209,749 次观看 • 10 个月前

Most AI tools today are just command-takers. You type, it responds. You click, it executes. There's truly no learning, no memory, no adaptation. You're still doing most of the work. Which is why Miles by Avo on Solana would make so much sense if built well. From what I understand so far, miles learns about you over time, adapts to how you operate, and figures out the tools you struggle to navigate on your own. Less clicking, more conversation, the more you use it, the better it gets at working with you, not just for you. That shift from command-follower to learning companion is bigger than it sounds. It's the difference between a tool and an agent that actually knows you. The second one is Agent Grid and this one is for builders and power users. But as I mentioned in this video, I'm still studying the Agent Grid. I'd come talk about it once I learn properly about it. Souren just keeps shipping!

Most AI tools today are just command-takers. You type, it responds. You click, it executes. There's truly no learning, no memory, no adaptation. You're still doing most of the work. Which is why Miles by Avo on Solana would make so much sense if built well. From what I understand so far, miles learns about you over time, adapts to how you operate, and figures out the tools you struggle to navigate on your own. Less clicking, more conversation, the more you use it, the better it gets at working with you, not just for you. That shift from command-follower to learning companion is bigger than it sounds. It's the difference between a tool and an agent that actually knows you. The second one is Agent Grid and this one is for builders and power users. But as I mentioned in this video, I'm still studying the Agent Grid. I'd come talk about it once I learn properly about it. Souren just keeps shipping!

Sir Khaycee

20,465 次观看 • 6 个月前

Just got the Core card from Plasma One. For free 🔥 Core normally runs $120 a year. They're handing it to early OGs at zero cost And the wild part, it pays for itself anyway: - ChatGPT Go included, $100 a year covered - 5% back on AI subs, 3% on everything else - 50% lower FX and offramp fees - Lounge access, global eSIM, 24/7 concierge Still early

Just got the Core card from Plasma One. For free 🔥 Core normally runs $120 a year. They're handing it to early OGs at zero cost And the wild part, it pays for itself anyway: - ChatGPT Go included, $100 a year covered - 5% back on AI subs, 3% on everything else - 50% lower FX and offramp fees - Lounge access, global eSIM, 24/7 concierge Still early

Nikita

39,296 次观看 • 3 个月前

I used to go to TikTok and get funny videos. I can’t do it anymore. It’s too depressing. It’s just overrun by AI, no way to filter it out, no one ever telling you it’s AI. Go to the comments, just masses of stupid people not suspecting a thing. This is by far the worst social media company. American leaders were right to be suspicious of it, and the administration’s corruption and lawlessness is why it’s still around and being like this.

I used to go to TikTok and get funny videos. I can’t do it anymore. It’s too depressing. It’s just overrun by AI, no way to filter it out, no one ever telling you it’s AI. Go to the comments, just masses of stupid people not suspecting a thing. This is by far the worst social media company. American leaders were right to be suspicious of it, and the administration’s corruption and lawlessness is why it’s still around and being like this.

Richard Hanania

41,776 次观看 • 7 个月前

Eyewitness News at 11 began after midnight in the early morning hours of September 11, 2001, because it was delayed by Monday Night Football. Michael Jordan, a wild high school party, and the New York Giants dominated headlines on WABC-TV's newscast. No one could have predicted what would happen the next day, a day Sam Champion forecasted as "sunny and pleasant."

Eyewitness News at 11 began after midnight in the early morning hours of September 11, 2001, because it was delayed by Monday Night Football. Michael Jordan, a wild high school party, and the New York Giants dominated headlines on WABC-TV's newscast. No one could have predicted what would happen the next day, a day Sam Champion forecasted as "sunny and pleasant."

Eyewitness News

24,872 次观看 • 20 天前

Colossus: The Forbin Project (1970) This underrated sci-fi thriller didn’t just imagine AI taking over, it shows exactly how humanity loses control…and never gets it back. Still terrifying on every rewatch. Directed by Joseph Sargent (The Taking of Pelham One Two Three).

Colossus: The Forbin Project (1970) This underrated sci-fi thriller didn’t just imagine AI taking over, it shows exactly how humanity loses control…and never gets it back. Still terrifying on every rewatch. Directed by Joseph Sargent (The Taking of Pelham One Two Three).

Vashi Nedomansky, ACE

232,842 次观看 • 6 个月前