Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Democrats and the Left are increasingly realizing that rather than simply denigrate Christianity, as they did in the past, they're better off trying to appropriate the language of Christianity and to use Jesus as a mascot for wickedness (as we saw with these protestors who stormed into a St.... Paul church and screamed in the faces of innocent children about their white "privilege." They then had the gall to claim they were "turning over tables" like Jesus.) Obviously, there's nothing Christ-like about that, as anyone with even a passing acquaintance with their Bible knows. But the Left is banking on people not being familiar with their Bibles. The same is true with James Talarico. What he says about Christianity is heresy. It is anathema to a holy, jealous God who will tolerate the worship of no other gods. What we learned in Ezra Klein's interview with him is that he is no follower of the Way, no follower of Christ. But Christian, you need to know your Bible well enough to be able to expose counterfeits like Talarico. This is where the battleground is now.show more

Megan Basham

207,574 subscribers

47,794 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Образование

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

James Talarico says “all religions of love point to the same truth.” But Christianity teaches the opposite. In John 14:6, Jesus says, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” You can respect other religions but you can’t claim they all lead to God. Christianity is exclusive in its claim that salvation is through Christ and Christ alone. It doesn't come as a surprise that Talarico is essentially a universalist who claims to be a Christian and uses some Christian tenets, but actually doesn't believe in the exclusivity of Christ.

James Talarico says “all religions of love point to the same truth.” But Christianity teaches the opposite. In John 14:6, Jesus says, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” You can respect other religions but you can’t claim they all lead to God. Christianity is exclusive in its claim that salvation is through Christ and Christ alone. It doesn't come as a surprise that Talarico is essentially a universalist who claims to be a Christian and uses some Christian tenets, but actually doesn't believe in the exclusivity of Christ.

Allie Beth Stuckey

55,586 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

James Talarico: "I believe Christianity points to the truth. I also think other religions of love point to the same truth. I think of different religious traditions as different languages, but we are all talking about the same reality. I believe Jesus Christ reveals that reality to us, but I also think that other traditions reveal that reality in their own ways with their own symbol structures. And I've learned more about my tradition by learning more about Buddhism and Hinduism and Islam and Judaism. And so I see these beautiful faith traditions as circling the same truth about the universe, about the cosmos." You can believe those things, but you can't be a Christian and believe that all religions point to the same truth. In John 14:6, the Jesus that James Talarico claims to follow says, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the father except through me." Talarico is still a member of his childhood congregation, St. Andrew Presbyterian Church, which is a very progressive church in Austin. It shouldn't be surprising at all that in the church’s About Us page it says, "We are Christ centered, yet we respect and learn from all religions of love." That's not a Christian position. If God is love and we believe in the trinity: God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, which no other religion believes in, then He is actually the only source of love. There aren't other religions of love in addition to Christianity. It doesn't come as a surprise that Talarico is essentially a universalist who claims to be a Christian and uses some Christian tenets, but actually doesn't believe in the exclusivity of Christ.

James Talarico: "I believe Christianity points to the truth. I also think other religions of love point to the same truth. I think of different religious traditions as different languages, but we are all talking about the same reality. I believe Jesus Christ reveals that reality to us, but I also think that other traditions reveal that reality in their own ways with their own symbol structures. And I've learned more about my tradition by learning more about Buddhism and Hinduism and Islam and Judaism. And so I see these beautiful faith traditions as circling the same truth about the universe, about the cosmos." You can believe those things, but you can't be a Christian and believe that all religions point to the same truth. In John 14:6, the Jesus that James Talarico claims to follow says, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the father except through me." Talarico is still a member of his childhood congregation, St. Andrew Presbyterian Church, which is a very progressive church in Austin. It shouldn't be surprising at all that in the church’s About Us page it says, "We are Christ centered, yet we respect and learn from all religions of love." That's not a Christian position. If God is love and we believe in the trinity: God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, which no other religion believes in, then He is actually the only source of love. There aren't other religions of love in addition to Christianity. It doesn't come as a surprise that Talarico is essentially a universalist who claims to be a Christian and uses some Christian tenets, but actually doesn't believe in the exclusivity of Christ.

Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey

11,548 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Texas Senate Frontrunner Ken Paxton Just TORCHED James Talarico as 'Anti-Christian False Prophet' Talarico claims God is nonbinary, twists Scripture to defend abortion, and pushes men in women’s sports. "He claims to be a pastor. This is what’s so dangerous about him: he's like a false prophet convincing people that he is a Christian pastor, but everything I hear from him is as far from the gospel of Jesus Christ as could possibly be imagined." "This guy is misleading people in Texas about what Christianity really is about. There’s no doubt that any mainline Christian pastor would disagree, any mainline Christian theologian would disagree with his presentation of what he claims is the gospel. It is antithetical to the gospel what he is preaching. And it is dangerous for people to not understand that." Pray that Texans see through Talarico's fake Christianity. He would be a disaster for Texas — and for the country.

Texas Senate Frontrunner Ken Paxton Just TORCHED James Talarico as 'Anti-Christian False Prophet' Talarico claims God is nonbinary, twists Scripture to defend abortion, and pushes men in women’s sports. "He claims to be a pastor. This is what’s so dangerous about him: he's like a false prophet convincing people that he is a Christian pastor, but everything I hear from him is as far from the gospel of Jesus Christ as could possibly be imagined." "This guy is misleading people in Texas about what Christianity really is about. There’s no doubt that any mainline Christian pastor would disagree, any mainline Christian theologian would disagree with his presentation of what he claims is the gospel. It is antithetical to the gospel what he is preaching. And it is dangerous for people to not understand that." Pray that Texans see through Talarico's fake Christianity. He would be a disaster for Texas — and for the country.

Benny Johnson

93,711 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Q: Why do so many on the Christian right seem obsessed with James Talarico? Journalist: The kind of Christianity he’s espousing is a threat to the cultural monopoly that the GOP wants to project over Christianity. They want to say that they have ownership of Christianity, and for someone like him to stand up and take it back is scary for them. The Christianity I grew up with bears no resemblance to what the GOP and MAGA are putting forward right now.

Q: Why do so many on the Christian right seem obsessed with James Talarico? Journalist: The kind of Christianity he’s espousing is a threat to the cultural monopoly that the GOP wants to project over Christianity. They want to say that they have ownership of Christianity, and for someone like him to stand up and take it back is scary for them. The Christianity I grew up with bears no resemblance to what the GOP and MAGA are putting forward right now.

Team Talarico

75,609 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

“We are saving Christianity. We are saving God.” -Eric Trump It takes a certain type of diabolical narcissism to believe that we can save God rather than that God is saving us. No matter where you land politically, we must name Christian Nationalism as a theological heresy. Rather than Jesus being the Savior of the world, political leaders claim to be the saviors of the world, of humanity, and civilization. And America replaces Jesus as God’s central messianic force at work in the world. Beware of anyone who says that they are saving God or even saving the world. There is only one Savior - and it is not Donald Trump. Rebuke it… in the name of Jesus.

“We are saving Christianity. We are saving God.” -Eric Trump It takes a certain type of diabolical narcissism to believe that we can save God rather than that God is saving us. No matter where you land politically, we must name Christian Nationalism as a theological heresy. Rather than Jesus being the Savior of the world, political leaders claim to be the saviors of the world, of humanity, and civilization. And America replaces Jesus as God’s central messianic force at work in the world. Beware of anyone who says that they are saving God or even saving the world. There is only one Savior - and it is not Donald Trump. Rebuke it… in the name of Jesus.

Shane Claiborne

24,717 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

CAMPUS CONTROVERSY: College student outraged after discovering her assigned textbook labels Christianity as a “white supremacist” group: “The book reiterated that Christianity is a U.S.-based white supremacist group, which I was mind blown because the textbook did not describe any other identities besides Christianity.” “The book had underlying propaganda, in my opinion. It seems as if they are innocent, but in reality, they know what they're doing and trying to push on their students.” “I'm proud of my faith, and I don't want people who don't know who Jesus is or who don't know what Christianity is to take this and run with this.”

CAMPUS CONTROVERSY: College student outraged after discovering her assigned textbook labels Christianity as a “white supremacist” group: “The book reiterated that Christianity is a U.S.-based white supremacist group, which I was mind blown because the textbook did not describe any other identities besides Christianity.” “The book had underlying propaganda, in my opinion. It seems as if they are innocent, but in reality, they know what they're doing and trying to push on their students.” “I'm proud of my faith, and I don't want people who don't know who Jesus is or who don't know what Christianity is to take this and run with this.”

Fox News

1,315,094 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Two Texans talk Talarico! Allie Beth Stuckey explains to Jeremy Boreing how Dems have changed their strategy: Maligning Christians is out. Wearing their faith as a costume is in. “The Beto brand didn’t exactly work… Now we have this seeming choir boy who is using Bible verses, who is talking about Jesus, and who is talking about tenets of Christianity that we really DO believe in… But then he’s manipulating those very real Christian values into supporting progressivism.” They discuss how Talarico uses a Christian veneer to convince others that the Bible supports abortion, transgenderism, and open borders. 🎥:

Jackie Chea ⚖️

19,801 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

TUCKER CARLSON: Christianity is Socialist. 🧵 Is it? Simply put, no. In the biblical worldview, the state is a temporal institution meant to serve man, an eternal being. In the socialist model this is reversed: man, a temporal being, serves the eternal state. Socialism is, by definition, atheistic. It is an attempt to build Heaven on earth without God. In making the state both the means and the end it violates the first commandment — “Thou shalt have no other gods before me” — and proceeds to violate the other 9 with wild abandon. Socialism is atheism masquerading as political philosophy. As such, socialist regimes always harbor a deep antipathy for authentic Christianity. Indeed, socialist regimes killed no less than 150 million people in the 20th century alone. That’s more than all religious wars from all previous centuries combined. But socialists have capitalized on the fact that many confuse socialism with Christianity. The Bible demolishes any socialist notions with a single sentence: “Thou shalt not steal.” With that one verse, the Bible affirms private property. Furthermore, giving in the Bible is volitional and is never divorced from the Gospel. In the socialist model, property is seized and, when given to the poor at all, is never coupled with the Gospel. Tucker’s guest refers to Acts. There we see members of the early church sharing what they have as hearts overflowed with joy. But giving wasn’t compelled. No one was required to do it. Advocates of the “Christianity is socialist” view often (mis)use the story of Ananias & Sapphira (Acts 5) who were struck down by the Holy Spirit. They will say it was because they didn’t give. Not so. Peter emphasizes in verse 4 that the property was theirs to do with as they wished. Twice. They were killed for lying to the Holy Spirit. So, no, Acts is no support to the socialist cause anymore than the rest of Scripture. Socialism is antithetical to Christianity, and where that faith is practiced faithfully it transforms society while socialism brings utter ruin.

TUCKER CARLSON: Christianity is Socialist. 🧵 Is it? Simply put, no. In the biblical worldview, the state is a temporal institution meant to serve man, an eternal being. In the socialist model this is reversed: man, a temporal being, serves the eternal state. Socialism is, by definition, atheistic. It is an attempt to build Heaven on earth without God. In making the state both the means and the end it violates the first commandment — “Thou shalt have no other gods before me” — and proceeds to violate the other 9 with wild abandon. Socialism is atheism masquerading as political philosophy. As such, socialist regimes always harbor a deep antipathy for authentic Christianity. Indeed, socialist regimes killed no less than 150 million people in the 20th century alone. That’s more than all religious wars from all previous centuries combined. But socialists have capitalized on the fact that many confuse socialism with Christianity. The Bible demolishes any socialist notions with a single sentence: “Thou shalt not steal.” With that one verse, the Bible affirms private property. Furthermore, giving in the Bible is volitional and is never divorced from the Gospel. In the socialist model, property is seized and, when given to the poor at all, is never coupled with the Gospel. Tucker’s guest refers to Acts. There we see members of the early church sharing what they have as hearts overflowed with joy. But giving wasn’t compelled. No one was required to do it. Advocates of the “Christianity is socialist” view often (mis)use the story of Ananias & Sapphira (Acts 5) who were struck down by the Holy Spirit. They will say it was because they didn’t give. Not so. Peter emphasizes in verse 4 that the property was theirs to do with as they wished. Twice. They were killed for lying to the Holy Spirit. So, no, Acts is no support to the socialist cause anymore than the rest of Scripture. Socialism is antithetical to Christianity, and where that faith is practiced faithfully it transforms society while socialism brings utter ruin.

Larry Alex Taunton

33,555 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

David French declares "I'm just really not willing to say that James Talarico is not a Christian. I'm just not going to do it" -- less than a second after he is reminded that Talarico believes that all religions contain the same truth as Christianity, thus denying the central Christian tenet of the exclusivity of Jesus Christ.

David French declares "I'm just really not willing to say that James Talarico is not a Christian. I'm just not going to do it" -- less than a second after he is reminded that Talarico believes that all religions contain the same truth as Christianity, thus denying the central Christian tenet of the exclusivity of Jesus Christ.

Breitbart News

119,019 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

When I watch the James Talarico clip of him saying he loves trans children, I think, "What a creep, what a groomer." David French wrote a glowing piece about Talarico's "Christianity." I have to ask you, David, what is Christian about advocating for queer theory and the transgender ideology to be inflicted on the minds, bodies, and souls of children? How is it loving to affirm the delusion of precious, young children who are innocently confused about gender by advocating that they irreversibly butcher and mutilate their own bodies? James Talarico is not Christian. He does not embody Christianity. He does not embody decency. He embodies the opposite. I can think of very few people in the conservative movement who have disappointed me more than this devolution of David French. We don't have to agree on all political positions or political strategy, but to try to whitewash James Talarico's openly evil positions and comments that are in direct opposition to the word of God about being decent and Christian... Well, that is evil.

Sensitive content

When I watch the James Talarico clip of him saying he loves trans children, I think, "What a creep, what a groomer." David French wrote a glowing piece about Talarico's "Christianity." I have to ask you, David, what is Christian about advocating for queer theory and the transgender ideology to be inflicted on the minds, bodies, and souls of children? How is it loving to affirm the delusion of precious, young children who are innocently confused about gender by advocating that they irreversibly butcher and mutilate their own bodies? James Talarico is not Christian. He does not embody Christianity. He does not embody decency. He embodies the opposite. I can think of very few people in the conservative movement who have disappointed me more than this devolution of David French. We don't have to agree on all political positions or political strategy, but to try to whitewash James Talarico's openly evil positions and comments that are in direct opposition to the word of God about being decent and Christian... Well, that is evil.

Liz Wheeler

33,281 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Notice what David French never references in his willingness to treat Talarico as a true Christian brother. And that is what scripture says. Talarico says God is nonbinary and has denied the exclusivity of Christ as the only means to eternal life. French is in clear disobedience by treating Talarico as a Christian. —1 Corinthians 5:11–13, But now I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who bears the name of brother if he is guilty of sexual immorality or greed, or is an idolater, reviler, drunkard, or swindler—not even to eat with such a one…God judges those outside. ‘Purge the evil person from among you.’ —2 Thessalonians 3:6, In the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, we command you, brothers and sisters, to keep away from every believer who is idle and disruptive and does not live according to the teaching you received from us. —2 Thes 3:13-14, Take special note of anyone who does not obey our instruction in this letter. Do not associate with them, in order that they may feel ashamed. (Also, this is a repost so that people can see the video).

Notice what David French never references in his willingness to treat Talarico as a true Christian brother. And that is what scripture says. Talarico says God is nonbinary and has denied the exclusivity of Christ as the only means to eternal life. French is in clear disobedience by treating Talarico as a Christian. —1 Corinthians 5:11–13, But now I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who bears the name of brother if he is guilty of sexual immorality or greed, or is an idolater, reviler, drunkard, or swindler—not even to eat with such a one…God judges those outside. ‘Purge the evil person from among you.’ —2 Thessalonians 3:6, In the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, we command you, brothers and sisters, to keep away from every believer who is idle and disruptive and does not live according to the teaching you received from us. —2 Thes 3:13-14, Take special note of anyone who does not obey our instruction in this letter. Do not associate with them, in order that they may feel ashamed. (Also, this is a repost so that people can see the video).

Megan Basham

95,697 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The Christian kvetching over this clip is pathetic. Here is the full context. In the interview Spielberg is not calling for the abolition or subversion of Christianity or the Church. The film literally includes a cardinal, a nun quoting scripture, and believers wrestling with what alien life would mean for their faith. Spielberg's conclusion is not that Christianity is false, but that god would still have dominion over alien life just as he does over humanity. This is directly out of mainstream Catholic theology. His point is the opposite of what people are claiming. He is suggesting that the creator god shared by Jews and Christians rules the entire universe, and that aliens or other unexplained phenomena would ultimately fall under that god's authority and reinforce it. That is the psyop, not "Christianity is being destroyed/subverted." Jews are not trying to destroy Christianity. Enough of this insecurity and persecution complex. Even by arguing this it shows that you have no idea what is going on.

The Christian kvetching over this clip is pathetic. Here is the full context. In the interview Spielberg is not calling for the abolition or subversion of Christianity or the Church. The film literally includes a cardinal, a nun quoting scripture, and believers wrestling with what alien life would mean for their faith. Spielberg's conclusion is not that Christianity is false, but that god would still have dominion over alien life just as he does over humanity. This is directly out of mainstream Catholic theology. His point is the opposite of what people are claiming. He is suggesting that the creator god shared by Jews and Christians rules the entire universe, and that aliens or other unexplained phenomena would ultimately fall under that god's authority and reinforce it. That is the psyop, not "Christianity is being destroyed/subverted." Jews are not trying to destroy Christianity. Enough of this insecurity and persecution complex. Even by arguing this it shows that you have no idea what is going on.

NeedMoreAmalek

18,305 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

God Himself is the ORIGINAL “Zionist” if that’s what you wanna call it. If you are a Christian & you are falling for the social media Psyop to hate Jews & Israel you need to open your Bible & read it. Start with Romans 11. Replacement theology practiced by people like Tucker (who is now a propagandist for Islamicism) is a heresy. According to this heresy, God is done with the Jews & anytime you see the word Israel in the Bible you must “replace” it with “the church”. This is a lie from the pit of hell. The Bible clearly makes a distinction between the Church & Israel & how God deals with each. 1. Romans 11 tells us Jewish rejection of Christ is ONLY TEMPORARY & at the appointed time when “the number of the gentiles (non Jews) has been fulfilled” Jews will accept Christ & all of Israel will be saved as the ORIGINAL branches of the Olive tree (Christ). Paul goes on to warn Christians (who are grafted in branches) not to boast & look down on Jews (the original branches) for their unbelief lest you LOSE your own salvation. Yes. God Word’s not mine so be careful. 2. You can NOT be a Christian & be against the existence of Israel because it means you are directly working against God’s Will, Plan & purpose for Israel in the last days. That land is part of a Covenant God made with the NATURAL descendants of Abraham, Isaac & Jacob. A covenant the Bible says is irrevocable & everlasting. That DOES NOT mean the fake straw man argument put out by dishonest people like Tucker, that it means you support the secular Israeli government & all they do, is true. I don’t support the the things the Israeli govt. does but I support Jewish people’s right to their ancestral land because I’m a Bible believing Christian. We as Christians are now spiritual descendants of Abraham. 3. Israel & yes modern day Israel is central to Biblical prophecy concerning the 2nd coming of Christ which Bible says happens in a Jerusalem under Jewish control. The fact that Trump recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, is a fulfillment of this very prophecy. 4. Jesus was & is a Jew. The Bible says Jesus is coming back as a Jew “the Lion of tribe of Judah (Jew)” to be exact. & he is returning to Jerusalem, Israel not.. Charlotte North Carolina, Not Paris France.. Israel. & Jews will weep & welcome Him as their King & “all of Israel will be saved” according to your Bible. So if you hate Jews & Israel. You are gonna have a hard time being a Christian when our Lord returns. Repent

God Himself is the ORIGINAL “Zionist” if that’s what you wanna call it. If you are a Christian & you are falling for the social media Psyop to hate Jews & Israel you need to open your Bible & read it. Start with Romans 11. Replacement theology practiced by people like Tucker (who is now a propagandist for Islamicism) is a heresy. According to this heresy, God is done with the Jews & anytime you see the word Israel in the Bible you must “replace” it with “the church”. This is a lie from the pit of hell. The Bible clearly makes a distinction between the Church & Israel & how God deals with each. 1. Romans 11 tells us Jewish rejection of Christ is ONLY TEMPORARY & at the appointed time when “the number of the gentiles (non Jews) has been fulfilled” Jews will accept Christ & all of Israel will be saved as the ORIGINAL branches of the Olive tree (Christ). Paul goes on to warn Christians (who are grafted in branches) not to boast & look down on Jews (the original branches) for their unbelief lest you LOSE your own salvation. Yes. God Word’s not mine so be careful. 2. You can NOT be a Christian & be against the existence of Israel because it means you are directly working against God’s Will, Plan & purpose for Israel in the last days. That land is part of a Covenant God made with the NATURAL descendants of Abraham, Isaac & Jacob. A covenant the Bible says is irrevocable & everlasting. That DOES NOT mean the fake straw man argument put out by dishonest people like Tucker, that it means you support the secular Israeli government & all they do, is true. I don’t support the the things the Israeli govt. does but I support Jewish people’s right to their ancestral land because I’m a Bible believing Christian. We as Christians are now spiritual descendants of Abraham. 3. Israel & yes modern day Israel is central to Biblical prophecy concerning the 2nd coming of Christ which Bible says happens in a Jerusalem under Jewish control. The fact that Trump recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, is a fulfillment of this very prophecy. 4. Jesus was & is a Jew. The Bible says Jesus is coming back as a Jew “the Lion of tribe of Judah (Jew)” to be exact. & he is returning to Jerusalem, Israel not.. Charlotte North Carolina, Not Paris France.. Israel. & Jews will weep & welcome Him as their King & “all of Israel will be saved” according to your Bible. So if you hate Jews & Israel. You are gonna have a hard time being a Christian when our Lord returns. Repent

Melissa Tate

131,526 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

“You can't get to Christian nationalism from the specific articulations of state-supported Christianity in the early Republic, because they do not want the state making determinations about what Christianity is.” — Miles Smith IV (Miles Smith IV) “In the early Republic, across the board, there is a real sense that we do not want Christianity associated with the idea of an American nation.” “Christianity was something other than the government.” “Our idea — especially insofar as people on the right articulate what gets called Christian nationalism — is an anachronism. You can only think of Christian nationalism as downstream from what we might historically call liberal Protestant assumptions. And I'm not saying all of those liberal Protestant assumptions are heretical per se.” “You can't get to Christian nationalism from the specific articulations of state-supported Christianity in the early Republic, because they do not want the state making determinations about what Christianity is. “Think of it this way: they're happy with the church telling them what Christianity is, but they don't want the state telling the church what Christianity is.” “In that sense, there's actually a pretty capacious place for ecclesiastical influence in the early Republic. I think people see that and say, "See, that's Christian nationalism." No — I think what's happening now is that we want the government to do the leading on that.” “When historically, at least in the United States, it was churchmen, educational institutions, and civic celebrations that aren’t even necessarily state-supported that were doing that. In the early Republic, there were many people speaking to the state. Now what we tend to want is actual politicians and government officers doing this.” Watch: Listen:

“You can't get to Christian nationalism from the specific articulations of state-supported Christianity in the early Republic, because they do not want the state making determinations about what Christianity is.” — Miles Smith IV (Miles Smith IV) “In the early Republic, across the board, there is a real sense that we do not want Christianity associated with the idea of an American nation.” “Christianity was something other than the government.” “Our idea — especially insofar as people on the right articulate what gets called Christian nationalism — is an anachronism. You can only think of Christian nationalism as downstream from what we might historically call liberal Protestant assumptions. And I'm not saying all of those liberal Protestant assumptions are heretical per se.” “You can't get to Christian nationalism from the specific articulations of state-supported Christianity in the early Republic, because they do not want the state making determinations about what Christianity is. “Think of it this way: they're happy with the church telling them what Christianity is, but they don't want the state telling the church what Christianity is.” “In that sense, there's actually a pretty capacious place for ecclesiastical influence in the early Republic. I think people see that and say, "See, that's Christian nationalism." No — I think what's happening now is that we want the government to do the leading on that.” “When historically, at least in the United States, it was churchmen, educational institutions, and civic celebrations that aren’t even necessarily state-supported that were doing that. In the early Republic, there were many people speaking to the state. Now what we tend to want is actual politicians and government officers doing this.” Watch: Listen:

Sola Media

25,698 просмотров • 16 дней назад

At a Q&A, John MacArthur is asked about Christian nationalism. The kingdom of God is not of this world. Jesus said that. He said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would [fight].” His kingdom is not of this world. The kingdom of this world is a separate world; they’re not linked together. Let me say it another way: Nothing that happens in any nation, whether it’s a Communist nation, a Muslim nation, or a “quasi-Christian” nation, or an atheistic nation—nothing in that nation politically, socially has anything to do with the advancement of the kingdom of God, because the kingdom of God is separate from that system. God, in His sovereignty, is building His church, “and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it,” Jesus said. So the idea that you should link up some political effort, some political process, some social process, some gain of power or influence in a culture as part of the advance of Christianity is alien to Christianity. You never have our Lord approaching anything like that, nor the apostles, and particularly the apostle Paul. He sought to gain no favor with the Roman Empire whatsoever, or for that matter, with any other of the rulers that he ran into during his life. Now, that is not to say that we are indifferent to what happens in the nation. We’ve been talking about that the last couple of Sunday mornings. We have to be the people who uphold righteousness. When we come to vote, we want to vote for that which is the most righteous option. Obviously, we can’t vote in righteousness, but we have to vote in a way that reflects our commitment to the righteousness of God. So we couldn’t possibly elect somebody who was an abortionist, somebody who was LGBTQ or LGBTQ-affirming, or any other deviation from God’s righteous moral standard. So it gets harder, doesn’t it, nowadays, because even sometimes when politicians are more conservative and anti-abortion, they may be sinful and wicked in some other categories, and it’s very hard to find out who is really honest and who is simply dishonest and seeking power. But in the end, we do what we can with the understanding that the responsibility of the church is not to advance the kingdom of this world. That’s a faulty viewpoint. Christian nationalism is usually tied to what is called post-millennialism, and that is the view that the church, somehow, by influencing the culture, can bring in the kingdom of Christ. In other words, it’s the idea not that Christ returns and sets up His kingdom, but that the church establishes His kingdom and then hands it to Him. That is not what Scripture teaches. What Scripture teaches is what we’re learning from the book of Revelation. Things are going to get worse and worse and worse. And the end of human history is not the church triumphant, reigning in the world and taking over the structures of human kingdoms; that’s not what happens. At the end of human history, the believers are persecuted and murdered, and that’s the very opposite of what Christian nationalism would anticipate. So we believe the Bible teaches that things get worse and worse, headed toward the wrath of God, which we’re seeing in Revelation, and then our Lord returns, Himself, to establish His kingdom is clearly what we read in the book of Revelation. OK?

At a Q&A, John MacArthur is asked about Christian nationalism. The kingdom of God is not of this world. Jesus said that. He said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would [fight].” His kingdom is not of this world. The kingdom of this world is a separate world; they’re not linked together. Let me say it another way: Nothing that happens in any nation, whether it’s a Communist nation, a Muslim nation, or a “quasi-Christian” nation, or an atheistic nation—nothing in that nation politically, socially has anything to do with the advancement of the kingdom of God, because the kingdom of God is separate from that system. God, in His sovereignty, is building His church, “and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it,” Jesus said. So the idea that you should link up some political effort, some political process, some social process, some gain of power or influence in a culture as part of the advance of Christianity is alien to Christianity. You never have our Lord approaching anything like that, nor the apostles, and particularly the apostle Paul. He sought to gain no favor with the Roman Empire whatsoever, or for that matter, with any other of the rulers that he ran into during his life. Now, that is not to say that we are indifferent to what happens in the nation. We’ve been talking about that the last couple of Sunday mornings. We have to be the people who uphold righteousness. When we come to vote, we want to vote for that which is the most righteous option. Obviously, we can’t vote in righteousness, but we have to vote in a way that reflects our commitment to the righteousness of God. So we couldn’t possibly elect somebody who was an abortionist, somebody who was LGBTQ or LGBTQ-affirming, or any other deviation from God’s righteous moral standard. So it gets harder, doesn’t it, nowadays, because even sometimes when politicians are more conservative and anti-abortion, they may be sinful and wicked in some other categories, and it’s very hard to find out who is really honest and who is simply dishonest and seeking power. But in the end, we do what we can with the understanding that the responsibility of the church is not to advance the kingdom of this world. That’s a faulty viewpoint. Christian nationalism is usually tied to what is called post-millennialism, and that is the view that the church, somehow, by influencing the culture, can bring in the kingdom of Christ. In other words, it’s the idea not that Christ returns and sets up His kingdom, but that the church establishes His kingdom and then hands it to Him. That is not what Scripture teaches. What Scripture teaches is what we’re learning from the book of Revelation. Things are going to get worse and worse and worse. And the end of human history is not the church triumphant, reigning in the world and taking over the structures of human kingdoms; that’s not what happens. At the end of human history, the believers are persecuted and murdered, and that’s the very opposite of what Christian nationalism would anticipate. So we believe the Bible teaches that things get worse and worse, headed toward the wrath of God, which we’re seeing in Revelation, and then our Lord returns, Himself, to establish His kingdom is clearly what we read in the book of Revelation. OK?

Terri Green

12,152 просмотров • 8 дней назад

This is one of John Piper's son, one who hasn't apostatized. He talks about the centrality of the Bible in their home, the upside and downside. To me it sounds like an extreme form of Biblicism. Our children need to be persuaded by us that Christianity is true, and then taught how to develop a Christian worldview and critique the competing secular worldview. Scripture is central to this, but not the only thing.

This is one of John Piper's son, one who hasn't apostatized. He talks about the centrality of the Bible in their home, the upside and downside. To me it sounds like an extreme form of Biblicism. Our children need to be persuaded by us that Christianity is true, and then taught how to develop a Christian worldview and critique the competing secular worldview. Scripture is central to this, but not the only thing.

Mike D'Virgilio, aka Based Boomer

42,090 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The church is no longer using discernment. The church is no longer in their Bibles- and it shows. The world’s stage is now seen as a pulpit. As long as someone says “Jesus” or mentions God, they are a Christian. The bar for being a Christian is in the dirt and it’s the perfect primed position for the man of sin to step onto the scene.

The church is no longer using discernment. The church is no longer in their Bibles- and it shows. The world’s stage is now seen as a pulpit. As long as someone says “Jesus” or mentions God, they are a Christian. The bar for being a Christian is in the dirt and it’s the perfect primed position for the man of sin to step onto the scene.

Ashley Hays

123,902 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 ALERT AMERICA: ANOTHER CHURCH CONVERTED - AND THEY NAMED IT “MOSQUE OF JESUS” Masjid Isa Ibn Maryam (“Mosque of Jesus, Son of Mary”) — Syracuse, New York This is the next church takeover — and they didn’t just convert a Christian house of worship. They spit in the face of Christians with the branding. They turned a church into a mosque… and then labeled it “Mosque of Jesus.” That’s not respect. That’s psychological warfare. Because Islam does not honor the Jesus of the Bible. Islam’s “Jesus” is not the Son of God. He is not crucified. He does not resurrect. And he does not save. The Islamic version of Jesus is used as a tool to refute Christianity, dismantle the Cross, and validate Muhammad. And that’s exactly why Christians must stop falling for the oldest deception in the book: ⚠️ “WE BELIEVE IN JESUS” IS NOT WHAT YOU THINK IT MEANS Muslim influencers and apologists aggressively target Christians with the same scripted tactic: They claim the Quran “respects Jesus”… Then insist the Quran’s version is more authentic… While quietly destroying everything Christianity is built on. This isn’t dialogue. It’s conversion strategy. Major Islamic online figures have built massive platforms pushing these narratives, using emotional manipulation, debate traps, and “same Jesus” messaging designed to confuse Christians and blur the line between truth and submission. ✅ THE CORE DIFFERENCE: ISLAM ERADICATES THE CROSS Christianity stands on one foundation: ✝️ Christ crucified and risen. Islam explicitly denies it: 📌 “They did not kill him, nor crucify him…” — Qur’an 4:157 📌 Those who say Christ is God are labeled disbelievers — Qur’an 5:17 / 5:72 📌 Christians are commanded to be fought and subdued — Qur’an 9:29 This is not a “small theological disagreement.” It is a direct assault on the center of Christianity. And the ultimate endgame is not hidden: Islamic tradition describes Jesus returning not to redeem humanity, but to destroy the cross and enforce Islamic dominance. THIS IS NOT “RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.” IT’S RELIGIOUS DOMINANCE. Churches across America are falling silent… …and mosques are rising in their place, not just as places of prayer, but as permanent ideological infrastructure. And now they are taking Christian sanctuaries and rebranding them with Christian names to neutralize Christian resistance. That is not coexistence. That is conquest. Church by church. City by city. State by state. America: wake up.

🚨 ALERT AMERICA: ANOTHER CHURCH CONVERTED - AND THEY NAMED IT “MOSQUE OF JESUS” Masjid Isa Ibn Maryam (“Mosque of Jesus, Son of Mary”) — Syracuse, New York This is the next church takeover — and they didn’t just convert a Christian house of worship. They spit in the face of Christians with the branding. They turned a church into a mosque… and then labeled it “Mosque of Jesus.” That’s not respect. That’s psychological warfare. Because Islam does not honor the Jesus of the Bible. Islam’s “Jesus” is not the Son of God. He is not crucified. He does not resurrect. And he does not save. The Islamic version of Jesus is used as a tool to refute Christianity, dismantle the Cross, and validate Muhammad. And that’s exactly why Christians must stop falling for the oldest deception in the book: ⚠️ “WE BELIEVE IN JESUS” IS NOT WHAT YOU THINK IT MEANS Muslim influencers and apologists aggressively target Christians with the same scripted tactic: They claim the Quran “respects Jesus”… Then insist the Quran’s version is more authentic… While quietly destroying everything Christianity is built on. This isn’t dialogue. It’s conversion strategy. Major Islamic online figures have built massive platforms pushing these narratives, using emotional manipulation, debate traps, and “same Jesus” messaging designed to confuse Christians and blur the line between truth and submission. ✅ THE CORE DIFFERENCE: ISLAM ERADICATES THE CROSS Christianity stands on one foundation: ✝️ Christ crucified and risen. Islam explicitly denies it: 📌 “They did not kill him, nor crucify him…” — Qur’an 4:157 📌 Those who say Christ is God are labeled disbelievers — Qur’an 5:17 / 5:72 📌 Christians are commanded to be fought and subdued — Qur’an 9:29 This is not a “small theological disagreement.” It is a direct assault on the center of Christianity. And the ultimate endgame is not hidden: Islamic tradition describes Jesus returning not to redeem humanity, but to destroy the cross and enforce Islamic dominance. THIS IS NOT “RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.” IT’S RELIGIOUS DOMINANCE. Churches across America are falling silent… …and mosques are rising in their place, not just as places of prayer, but as permanent ideological infrastructure. And now they are taking Christian sanctuaries and rebranding them with Christian names to neutralize Christian resistance. That is not coexistence. That is conquest. Church by church. City by city. State by state. America: wake up.

Amy Mek

60,340 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

You wanna know why I hate Christianity, because of this right here: "Paganism was largely eradicated in Muslim and Christian countries, and now Judaism was preserved, protected, and is now more powerful than ever" "They like that Jesus conquered all the pagan gods. And now all them worship the God of Israel and believe their Torah. Why will the Christians not show you this stuff? Because they're frauds" "Who taught the Gentiles that they were worshipping demons? Oh, it was the Jews. It was the Saul. The Pharisee told him that" "There is a tractate in the Talmud that talks about the the the correct way to destroy an idol of a Gentile is to knock off their nose like they knocked off the nose and carved the crosses in the forehead. "This is literally the Talmudic Jewish agenda of conquering all of the religions of the world. This is what the Christians did" "Christianity is completely kosher now, and people still want to be in denial that this is an op, that this is a psyop" "Christians destroyed Western civilization, the libraries, the temples, the mythologies, the philosophies, the science, they destroyed it all in the name of the God of the Jews. That's the reality of what happened"

You wanna know why I hate Christianity, because of this right here: "Paganism was largely eradicated in Muslim and Christian countries, and now Judaism was preserved, protected, and is now more powerful than ever" "They like that Jesus conquered all the pagan gods. And now all them worship the God of Israel and believe their Torah. Why will the Christians not show you this stuff? Because they're frauds" "Who taught the Gentiles that they were worshipping demons? Oh, it was the Jews. It was the Saul. The Pharisee told him that" "There is a tractate in the Talmud that talks about the the the correct way to destroy an idol of a Gentile is to knock off their nose like they knocked off the nose and carved the crosses in the forehead. "This is literally the Talmudic Jewish agenda of conquering all of the religions of the world. This is what the Christians did" "Christianity is completely kosher now, and people still want to be in denial that this is an op, that this is a psyop" "Christians destroyed Western civilization, the libraries, the temples, the mythologies, the philosophies, the science, they destroyed it all in the name of the God of the Jews. That's the reality of what happened"

Seethroughitall

10,583 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 CHRIST IS KING ✝️ A Muslim man is in tears as he proclaims that the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ is the one true living God❗️ The man has converted to Christianity after Jesus came to him in his time of need 🙏 MERRY CHRISTMAS 🎄

🚨 CHRIST IS KING ✝️ A Muslim man is in tears as he proclaims that the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ is the one true living God❗️ The man has converted to Christianity after Jesus came to him in his time of need 🙏 MERRY CHRISTMAS 🎄

BRITAIN IS BROKEN 🇬🇧

405,007 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад