Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Canada liberal government has 3 bills that when passed will be their most destructive bills ever put into law Free speech will be ended, Canadians will be thrown in prison for social media posts, warrantless searches of phones, pre-crime punishments and even open your mail Bill C-2 - empowers... government employees, not police, to open your mail, search your phone or computer — all without a warrant. Bill C-8 - gives cabinet ministers the power to kick Canadians off the internet, impose fines, and demand data — no judge, no police review. Bill C-9 - removes legal safeguards around free speech. Justice Centre expands “hate” prosecutions. Online Harms Act - brings pre-crime punishment: house arrest, ankle bracelets, curfews for people who haven’t committed a crime. Because they might. “If the Online Harms Act is brought back and passed into law, you're gonna see the Canadian Human Rights Commission with massive new powers to prosecute Canadians over offensive non-criminal speech with penalties up to $50,000” (This is a bill that insiders say is about to be revived and passed with the 3 above) “Canada will be a police state by Christmas if Parliament passes bills C2, C8, and C9 in their current form. C2 is the Strong Borders Act. It should be called the Strong Surveillance Act. It empowers Canada Post to open letter mail without a warrant. It criminalizes the use of cash in amounts greater than $10,000. And it empowers a vast army of government officials, not just police, to conduct warrantless searches of the computers and cell phones of Canadians. It is a massive invasion of privacy. It's extremely dangerous.” “You're gonna see a Digital Safety Commission with a vast army of bureaucrats to enforce federal regulations that are passed in respective of the internet and internet contents. And you're gonna see Canadians punished preemptively because their neighbor fears that they might commit a hate speech crime in future, the Online Harms Act would authorize judges to place Canadians under house arrest, wearing an ankle bracelet and respect a curfew, et cetera. Giving the federal government, giving federal cabinet ministers power to kick Canadians off the internet is not necessary for protecting public safety or defending our national security.”show more

Wall Street Apes

1,392,837 subscribers

172,610 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & Wellness News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Canadians mail should not be accessed without a warrant. Canadians should not be kicked off the internet without due process. Canadians should not be threated with unprecedented police powers to suppress speech online. But for every societal problem, the Liberals' first instinct is to erode the freedoms of Canadians. Thank you to the many residents of York-Durham who have written to me about this. I will keep fighting against the kinds of attacks on personal freedom the government has introduced in Bills C-2, C-8, and C-9.

Canadians mail should not be accessed without a warrant. Canadians should not be kicked off the internet without due process. Canadians should not be threated with unprecedented police powers to suppress speech online. But for every societal problem, the Liberals' first instinct is to erode the freedoms of Canadians. Thank you to the many residents of York-Durham who have written to me about this. I will keep fighting against the kinds of attacks on personal freedom the government has introduced in Bills C-2, C-8, and C-9.

Jacob Mantle

76,218 views • 9 months ago

A WARNING To All Canadians: Your Freedoms Are UNDER DIRECT ATTACK With Bills C-2, C-8 And C-9!!! This is a warning to all Canadians that the government is coming for your freedoms and they have no plans of slowing down until they get them. The liberal government is pushing Bills C-2, C-8, C-9, and the Online Harms Act and the goal here is complete and total control over your life. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down the implications of these bills and why they must be rejected now before they get a chance of becoming actual laws!

A WARNING To All Canadians: Your Freedoms Are UNDER DIRECT ATTACK With Bills C-2, C-8 And C-9!!! This is a warning to all Canadians that the government is coming for your freedoms and they have no plans of slowing down until they get them. The liberal government is pushing Bills C-2, C-8, C-9, and the Online Harms Act and the goal here is complete and total control over your life. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down the implications of these bills and why they must be rejected now before they get a chance of becoming actual laws!

Dan Dicks

47,180 views • 9 months ago

They are building a digital cage, and they are doing it through a web of multiple bills designed to strip away your remaining anonymity. Look at the full picture: 🚨Bill C-34 (the safe social media act): Branded as a kids ban for under 16. But to lock kids out, they have to lock adults in. Main steam platforms will be forced to implement facial age, estimation and digital ID gates for everyone just to verify that you are an adult. 🚨Bill S-210: branded as a crackdown on adult websites, but the legal text is so broad. It catches search engines like Google and open platforms like X and Reddit. It forces facial recognition checkpoints onto the sites you use daily, backed by $500,000 corporate fines. 🚨Bill C-36: the brand new bill that just dropped, creating a massive federal, digital safety commission. This new digital, super regulator strips, power away from the independent privacy, commissioner, centralizing, total enforcement and private data oversight under a single government appointed panel. 🚨Bill C-63: the massive framework creating a new, government appointed digital safety commission. It weaponizes human rights tribunal to police online speech and introduces heavy-handed hate speech regulations that civil liberty groups warn threaten your right to dissent. 🚨Bill C-9: the criminal follow up that expands the definition of hate and increases penalties under the criminal code, building the legal teeth to enforce what the new digital regulators deem. Unacceptable speech online. 🚨Bill C-22: the ultimate surveillance trap. It forces, Internet providers, VPN’s, and tech platforms to build back and back doors for law-enforcement, mandating that companies, track and store the personal meta-data of all Canadians for up to a year without you ever been suspected of a crime. They didn’t pass one massive digital ID law because they knew that you would fight it. They broke it into pieces. They wrapped it in child safety. They are forcing the private sector to build the walls. No more casual scrolling. No more anonymity. Every tap, account, and view tied directly to your legal name. God Speed.

Unfiltered With Kels

12,170 views • 1 month ago

Canada is being told Bills C-8 and C-9 are about “safety” and “hate prevention.” In reality, they’re two of the most dangerous control bills we’ve ever seen. Canada is being told Bills C-8 and C-9 are about “safety” and “hate prevention.” In reality, they’re two of the most dangerous control bills we’ve ever seen. C-8 lets the government secretly cut off your internet, block content, silence voices, and seize digital networks — all without telling you why. C-9 lets prosecutors decide what speech is “hate,” removes oversight, and hands the government the power to criminalize the wrong opinion. This isn’t protection. This is control. If Canadians don't speak up now, we’ll wake up in a country where the government decides what you say — and whether you’re allowed to say it at all. Wake up, Canada. Tell your MP: NO to Bills C-8 & C-9.

Canada is being told Bills C-8 and C-9 are about “safety” and “hate prevention.” In reality, they’re two of the most dangerous control bills we’ve ever seen. Canada is being told Bills C-8 and C-9 are about “safety” and “hate prevention.” In reality, they’re two of the most dangerous control bills we’ve ever seen. C-8 lets the government secretly cut off your internet, block content, silence voices, and seize digital networks — all without telling you why. C-9 lets prosecutors decide what speech is “hate,” removes oversight, and hands the government the power to criminalize the wrong opinion. This isn’t protection. This is control. If Canadians don't speak up now, we’ll wake up in a country where the government decides what you say — and whether you’re allowed to say it at all. Wake up, Canada. Tell your MP: NO to Bills C-8 & C-9.

Lisa Robinson

54,951 views • 8 months ago

Karnatka's Hate Speech Bill: Congress government in Karnataka has tabled a bill that claims to curb hate speech, but it attempts to risk free speech! The wording of the bill is vague and open to interpretation, which means even ordinary statements could be judged as ill will and lead to serious criminal action. India already has laws to deal with hate speech, and even the Supreme Court has said that the real problem is weak enforcement, not the absence of law. When the line between free speech and crime becomes unclear, people begin to self censor out of fear rather than responsibility!

Karnatka's Hate Speech Bill: Congress government in Karnataka has tabled a bill that claims to curb hate speech, but it attempts to risk free speech! The wording of the bill is vague and open to interpretation, which means even ordinary statements could be judged as ill will and lead to serious criminal action. India already has laws to deal with hate speech, and even the Supreme Court has said that the real problem is weak enforcement, not the absence of law. When the line between free speech and crime becomes unclear, people begin to self censor out of fear rather than responsibility!

Praffulgarg

11,269 views • 7 months ago

Their New Social Media Ban Means Every Canadian Must Show Government ID To Access Their Accounts They call it a social media ban to protect your kids. Here's what it actually means — every Canadian will be forced to show government approved ID to access their social media accounts. Your real name. Attached to every account. Given directly to the platforms. And when you connect that to Bill C-22 which forces telecoms to retain your metadata without a warrant, Bill C-9 which criminalizes hate speech, Bill C-8 which gives the government the power to cut your internet access, and the soon to be retabled Bill C-63 — you start to see the full picture. This isn't about protecting your kids. It's about building the infrastructure to control what every Canadian can say online. I did a full breakdown of exactly how these four bills work together and what it means for every Canadian. Watch the full breakdown here 👇

Their New Social Media Ban Means Every Canadian Must Show Government ID To Access Their Accounts They call it a social media ban to protect your kids. Here's what it actually means — every Canadian will be forced to show government approved ID to access their social media accounts. Your real name. Attached to every account. Given directly to the platforms. And when you connect that to Bill C-22 which forces telecoms to retain your metadata without a warrant, Bill C-9 which criminalizes hate speech, Bill C-8 which gives the government the power to cut your internet access, and the soon to be retabled Bill C-63 — you start to see the full picture. This isn't about protecting your kids. It's about building the infrastructure to control what every Canadian can say online. I did a full breakdown of exactly how these four bills work together and what it means for every Canadian. Watch the full breakdown here 👇

Nico Lagan

87,150 views • 3 months ago

Documentary on Canadian Woke Authoritarianism: The Hate Network Premieres in Alberta The film features several high-profile scholars and other Canadians who say they were vilified by a government-funded “smear merchant” known as the Canadian Anti-Hate Network. It examines how free speech is suppressed using taxpayer dollars. “Antifa doesn’t care if Charlie Kirk gets shot and killed — don’t be afraid of Antifa or Anti-Hate calling you names, because they wouldn’t care if you die,” Greg Wycliffe said, encouraging people not to fear an entity with ties to Antifa, which has been designated by the U.S. government as a domestic terrorist organization. “This movie, my friends, doesn’t end if you will not rise up — evil never stops on its own; evil must be stopped,” proclaimed Pastor Artur Pawlowski, who was jailed for refusing to close his church during COVID-19. “Censorship grows like a cancer, and we need to root it out and restore freedom in Canada,” stated John Carpay, president of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms. About 150 people attended the screening in Calgary, Alberta. According to the filmmaker, more screenings will be announced across the country, with the aim of bringing Canadians onto the same page about the state of free speech in Canada and ending federal funding of the Canadian Anti-Hate Network. “The state of free speech is pitiful. If Bill C-9 passes, or if they try to resurrect the Online Harms Act, that’s it — we’re finished in terms of free speech in Canada. We cannot let that happen, and part of stopping it is educating middle-of-the-road Canadians who don’t know what’s going on,” Wycliffe said. Follow and support Media Bezirgan for more exclusive coverage of news that matters.

Mocha Bezirgan 🇨🇦

29,420 views • 7 months ago

Video : Liberal MP Arif Virania admits that if Bill C-63 passes, the regulator and the ombudsperson will not be in place before the next election. But the human rights act and the criminal code amendments will take effect. The Ombudsperson & regulators are supposed to be there to protect Canadians from abuse of the system. So we could go into the Oct 2025 election with huge numbers of Canadians taken offline or severely restricted online, with no way to fight back, before the election is over. Make no mistake, our government is doing everything it can to rig the next election. Censorship and mass retroactive citizenship seems to be their key plans.

Video : Liberal MP Arif Virania admits that if Bill C-63 passes, the regulator and the ombudsperson will not be in place before the next election. But the human rights act and the criminal code amendments will take effect. The Ombudsperson & regulators are supposed to be there to protect Canadians from abuse of the system. So we could go into the Oct 2025 election with huge numbers of Canadians taken offline or severely restricted online, with no way to fight back, before the election is over. Make no mistake, our government is doing everything it can to rig the next election. Censorship and mass retroactive citizenship seems to be their key plans.

Bruce McGonigal

92,962 views • 2 years ago

Bill C-8 IS NOW LAW: Canada’s WARRANTLESS SURVEILLANCE NIGHTMARE Explained!! On June 16, 2026, Bill C-8 (formerly Bill C-26) received Royal Assent and became official. This legislation gives the government sweeping new surveillance powers, including: - Warrantless access to your subscriber data, location, browsing history, metadata, and more - The ability for one minister to secretly order your internet or phone service shut off with no court review - Secret gag orders preventing companies from telling you why your service was cut - Broad powers that could force weakening of encryption Sold to Canadians as a “cybersecurity” bill to protect critical infrastructure, it actually delivers massive new warrantless spying powers and internet kill switches with almost no oversight. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down exactly what’s in Bill C-8 and what it means for your privacy. Please share this video far and wide because most Canadians still have no idea this just became law!

Bill C-8 IS NOW LAW: Canada’s WARRANTLESS SURVEILLANCE NIGHTMARE Explained!! On June 16, 2026, Bill C-8 (formerly Bill C-26) received Royal Assent and became official. This legislation gives the government sweeping new surveillance powers, including: - Warrantless access to your subscriber data, location, browsing history, metadata, and more - The ability for one minister to secretly order your internet or phone service shut off with no court review - Secret gag orders preventing companies from telling you why your service was cut - Broad powers that could force weakening of encryption Sold to Canadians as a “cybersecurity” bill to protect critical infrastructure, it actually delivers massive new warrantless spying powers and internet kill switches with almost no oversight. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down exactly what’s in Bill C-8 and what it means for your privacy. Please share this video far and wide because most Canadians still have no idea this just became law!

Dan Dicks

84,857 views • 1 month ago

As online harms intensify, children are particularly at risk. To better protect them, our government has introduced the Safe Social Media Act, which will make social media services and AI chatbot services safer for children. The bill, if passed, would require social media services and AI chatbot services to identify, mitigate, and address risks of harm on their platforms, and to develop services that are safe by design and put the safety of children first. It would also prevent Canadians under 16 from having accounts on social media services, while providing a process for social media platforms to seek an exemption if they can demonstrate that they have put in place a sufficient set of protections for children. This law is about holding platforms accountable and ensuring they have protections in place to keep children safe online, reduce harm before it happens, and ensure that digital spaces are safe by design all while protecting the privacy of Canadians.

As online harms intensify, children are particularly at risk. To better protect them, our government has introduced the Safe Social Media Act, which will make social media services and AI chatbot services safer for children. The bill, if passed, would require social media services and AI chatbot services to identify, mitigate, and address risks of harm on their platforms, and to develop services that are safe by design and put the safety of children first. It would also prevent Canadians under 16 from having accounts on social media services, while providing a process for social media platforms to seek an exemption if they can demonstrate that they have put in place a sufficient set of protections for children. This law is about holding platforms accountable and ensuring they have protections in place to keep children safe online, reduce harm before it happens, and ensure that digital spaces are safe by design all while protecting the privacy of Canadians.

Yvan Baker, MP 🇨🇦🇺🇦

17,785 views • 1 month ago

Free speech is a core value of our civilization. We need to stop Bill C-9. This bill is designed to limit your speech by labeling you as an Islamophobe or racist without any specific definition. We don’t lack laws in Canada. If the authorities do not enforce the existing laws against jihadists, and if the RCMP and CSIS receive advice from Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups, it does not mean that a new law will stop the hate rallies and the glorification of terrorism in our streets. If Bill C-9 passes, I can say: welcome to the Islamic Republic of Canada.

Free speech is a core value of our civilization. We need to stop Bill C-9. This bill is designed to limit your speech by labeling you as an Islamophobe or racist without any specific definition. We don’t lack laws in Canada. If the authorities do not enforce the existing laws against jihadists, and if the RCMP and CSIS receive advice from Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups, it does not mean that a new law will stop the hate rallies and the glorification of terrorism in our streets. If Bill C-9 passes, I can say: welcome to the Islamic Republic of Canada.

Salman Sima

23,574 views • 4 months ago

Bill C-34: The End Of Anonymous Internet In Canada – What You NEED TO KNOW!! Last month the Carney Liberals tabled Bill C-34, marketed as the “Safe Social Media Act.” In reality, this bill is a full-scale assault on anonymity and digital freedom. Under the banner of “protecting children,” the government wants to raise the minimum social media age to 16 and force every single user, including adults, to verify their age through government ID uploads, facial scans, AI age estimation, or whatever method their new Digital Safety Commission approves. That means the end of anonymous browsing, private thoughts online, and unmonitored speech. Every Canadian will be tracked, traced, and databased all while the government “promises” to delete your data later. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down exactly what Bill C-34 does, how it revives the worst elements of the failed Online Harms Act, the vague “hatred” and “incitement” rules that will lead to mass over-censorship, and most importantly what YOU can do about it now before it’s too late! Please share this video far and wide!!

Bill C-34: The End Of Anonymous Internet In Canada – What You NEED TO KNOW!! Last month the Carney Liberals tabled Bill C-34, marketed as the “Safe Social Media Act.” In reality, this bill is a full-scale assault on anonymity and digital freedom. Under the banner of “protecting children,” the government wants to raise the minimum social media age to 16 and force every single user, including adults, to verify their age through government ID uploads, facial scans, AI age estimation, or whatever method their new Digital Safety Commission approves. That means the end of anonymous browsing, private thoughts online, and unmonitored speech. Every Canadian will be tracked, traced, and databased all while the government “promises” to delete your data later. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down exactly what Bill C-34 does, how it revives the worst elements of the failed Online Harms Act, the vague “hatred” and “incitement” rules that will lead to mass over-censorship, and most importantly what YOU can do about it now before it’s too late! Please share this video far and wide!!

Dan Dicks

25,283 views • 15 days ago

Stop C-2: Mark Carney’s new bill lets police open your mail without a warrant — and worse! I’ve read Mark Carney’s new bill, C-2. It claims to be Canada’s response to Donald Trump’s demand for border security. And there’s a little bit of that in the bill. But the rest of the bill is salted with things that have nothing to do with border security, and everything to do with snooping on law-abiding citizens. • The bill allows police to open your mail — without a search warrant. • It lets police contact any Internet-based company, to get all of your account details including your name, address, online nicknames and other invasive details — without a search warrant. • And it even makes it a crime to do transactions above $10,000 using cash. What does any of that have to do with stopping illegal immigrants or fentanyl at the Canada-U.S. border? It doesn’t take a lot of imagination to see how this law will be abused by the Liberals. Remember what they did with existing laws during the trucker convoy — seizing bank accounts, arresting political opponents of the regime. You can imagine who they’ll target with these privacy-destroying powers. This is how they’re going to go after their enemies list. I also worry that Mark Carney — the former governor of the Bank of Canada and Bank of England — wants to make it harder and harder to use cash, precisely because it’s untraceable and unstoppable. His shocking new ban on transactions over $10,000 looks designed to pave the way for a Central Bank Digital Currency, a kind of electronic “smart money” that would allow the government to track your spending, and even “shut off” the currency if you try to buy things the government opposes, whether it’s lawful firearms, a donation to the truckers, or even for things they deem hostile to the environment, like buying gas or eating meat. If you think I’m exaggerating, watch the video above — I’ll take you through the legislation, line-by-line. It’s about 20 minutes long, but I promise you, every paragraph is more shocking than the next. Trump told Carney to crack down on terrorists and drug dealers, but instead Carney is cracking down on ordinary Canadians, treating us all like enemies. And he’s just getting started — he hasn’t yet revealed his new online censorship bill. We’ve got to stop this. If we can show there’s a massive groundswell against this, it just might be possible to stop it, given that Carney doesn’t quite have a majority government. They want to snoop through your mail, snoop through your online history and stop you from using cash (because it’s too private). They want to destroy any privacy we have — even though their own government has never been more secretive. I think 99% of Canadians haven’t even heard of C-2. After all, it was just introduced this week. We’ve got to spread the word — please forward this message to your friends and family. (Thanks.) REPORT by Ezra Levant 🍁🚛:

Stop C-2: Mark Carney’s new bill lets police open your mail without a warrant — and worse! I’ve read Mark Carney’s new bill, C-2. It claims to be Canada’s response to Donald Trump’s demand for border security. And there’s a little bit of that in the bill. But the rest of the bill is salted with things that have nothing to do with border security, and everything to do with snooping on law-abiding citizens. • The bill allows police to open your mail — without a search warrant. • It lets police contact any Internet-based company, to get all of your account details including your name, address, online nicknames and other invasive details — without a search warrant. • And it even makes it a crime to do transactions above $10,000 using cash. What does any of that have to do with stopping illegal immigrants or fentanyl at the Canada-U.S. border? It doesn’t take a lot of imagination to see how this law will be abused by the Liberals. Remember what they did with existing laws during the trucker convoy — seizing bank accounts, arresting political opponents of the regime. You can imagine who they’ll target with these privacy-destroying powers. This is how they’re going to go after their enemies list. I also worry that Mark Carney — the former governor of the Bank of Canada and Bank of England — wants to make it harder and harder to use cash, precisely because it’s untraceable and unstoppable. His shocking new ban on transactions over $10,000 looks designed to pave the way for a Central Bank Digital Currency, a kind of electronic “smart money” that would allow the government to track your spending, and even “shut off” the currency if you try to buy things the government opposes, whether it’s lawful firearms, a donation to the truckers, or even for things they deem hostile to the environment, like buying gas or eating meat. If you think I’m exaggerating, watch the video above — I’ll take you through the legislation, line-by-line. It’s about 20 minutes long, but I promise you, every paragraph is more shocking than the next. Trump told Carney to crack down on terrorists and drug dealers, but instead Carney is cracking down on ordinary Canadians, treating us all like enemies. And he’s just getting started — he hasn’t yet revealed his new online censorship bill. We’ve got to stop this. If we can show there’s a massive groundswell against this, it just might be possible to stop it, given that Carney doesn’t quite have a majority government. They want to snoop through your mail, snoop through your online history and stop you from using cash (because it’s too private). They want to destroy any privacy we have — even though their own government has never been more secretive. I think 99% of Canadians haven’t even heard of C-2. After all, it was just introduced this week. We’ve got to spread the word — please forward this message to your friends and family. (Thanks.) REPORT by Ezra Levant 🍁🚛:

Rebel News

40,054 views • 1 year ago

Canada's speech crackdown has already begun — speak up while you still can I genuinely believe we are closer to a real speech crackdown in this country than at any point in modern Canadian history. And the craziest part is they’re not even hiding it anymore. While Canadians were distracted by inflation, tariffs and housing costs, the Liberals quietly buried something deeply disturbing on page 145 of the Spring Economic Statement: amendments to the Canada Post Corporation Act expanding police powers to search and seize your mail. Your actual physical mail. Letters. Packages. Private correspondence. Read that alongside the Liberals’ censorship agenda, and the pattern becomes impossible to ignore. If Canadians move sensitive conversations off social media and back to texts, phones and old-fashioned mail to avoid government snoops, Carney’s people appear to have anticipated that already. They are tightening control over digital communication while quietly expanding state access to private correspondence at the same time. There is no escape hatch. And before anybody accuses me of paranoia, let me remind you what Trudeau’s government already tried to make law. Bill C-36 would have allowed anonymous complaints over lawful speech. Somebody could accuse you of hateful expression, and you might never properly confront your accuser. The bill proposed fines of up to $20,000 paid directly to the complainant, plus another $50,000 paid to the government itself. Over speech. Not violence. Not terrorism. Speech somebody found offensive online. And then came the truly chilling part: pre-crime restrictions. The Liberals wanted courts to impose curfews, communication bans and house arrest conditions on Canadians who had committed no criminal offence whatsoever, simply because somebody claimed to fear what they might say in the future. Not punishment for criminal conduct. Punishment for predicted wrongthink. Then came Bill C-63, the Online Harms Act, which proposed even more censorship infrastructure through digital safety commissions, regulators and online speech enforcement bodies. The same activist ecosystem backed every step of it: anti-hate NGOs, censorship advocates, activist academics and taxpayer-funded organizations that increasingly treat free expression itself as the social problem to solve. Those bills died when the election was called. The agenda didn’t. Now Mark Carney’s government is openly signalling it wants another crack at it. Marc Miller admitted Canada is “a couple years behind” Britain and Australia on internet regulation. Britain. The country where police investigate tweets and Facebook posts. Where citizens get questioned over memes and offensive jokes. Where authorities reportedly made more than 12,000 arrests tied to online communications offences in a single year. And instead of treating that as a warning sign, Canada’s political class increasingly talks about it like it’s a model worth copying. That should terrify every Canadian. Because freedom rarely disappears dramatically. It disappears slowly, bureaucratically and under the language of safety and harm reduction. And Carney may actually be more effective at advancing this agenda than Trudeau ever was because Trudeau sounded ideological and flaky. Carney sounds calm, managerial and “evidence-based,” which makes people lower their guard while the state accumulates more power over speech and information. And independent media will obviously be among the first targets. Government-funded outlets like the CBC have very little to fear from censorship systems because they already exist safely inside the approved institutional framework. They support the government because the government supports them. The pressure lands on independent journalists, alternative media and anybody operating outside establishment narratives — because we are skeptics of government. That’s where this road leads: criminalized dissent, self-censorship and a country where ordinary people slowly become afraid to speak honestly because the legal, financial and social consequences become too risky. And once that fear becomes cultural, governments barely need to censor anybody anymore. People start censoring themselves. We need to speak up now, while we still can. Go to

Canada's speech crackdown has already begun — speak up while you still can I genuinely believe we are closer to a real speech crackdown in this country than at any point in modern Canadian history. And the craziest part is they’re not even hiding it anymore. While Canadians were distracted by inflation, tariffs and housing costs, the Liberals quietly buried something deeply disturbing on page 145 of the Spring Economic Statement: amendments to the Canada Post Corporation Act expanding police powers to search and seize your mail. Your actual physical mail. Letters. Packages. Private correspondence. Read that alongside the Liberals’ censorship agenda, and the pattern becomes impossible to ignore. If Canadians move sensitive conversations off social media and back to texts, phones and old-fashioned mail to avoid government snoops, Carney’s people appear to have anticipated that already. They are tightening control over digital communication while quietly expanding state access to private correspondence at the same time. There is no escape hatch. And before anybody accuses me of paranoia, let me remind you what Trudeau’s government already tried to make law. Bill C-36 would have allowed anonymous complaints over lawful speech. Somebody could accuse you of hateful expression, and you might never properly confront your accuser. The bill proposed fines of up to $20,000 paid directly to the complainant, plus another $50,000 paid to the government itself. Over speech. Not violence. Not terrorism. Speech somebody found offensive online. And then came the truly chilling part: pre-crime restrictions. The Liberals wanted courts to impose curfews, communication bans and house arrest conditions on Canadians who had committed no criminal offence whatsoever, simply because somebody claimed to fear what they might say in the future. Not punishment for criminal conduct. Punishment for predicted wrongthink. Then came Bill C-63, the Online Harms Act, which proposed even more censorship infrastructure through digital safety commissions, regulators and online speech enforcement bodies. The same activist ecosystem backed every step of it: anti-hate NGOs, censorship advocates, activist academics and taxpayer-funded organizations that increasingly treat free expression itself as the social problem to solve. Those bills died when the election was called. The agenda didn’t. Now Mark Carney’s government is openly signalling it wants another crack at it. Marc Miller admitted Canada is “a couple years behind” Britain and Australia on internet regulation. Britain. The country where police investigate tweets and Facebook posts. Where citizens get questioned over memes and offensive jokes. Where authorities reportedly made more than 12,000 arrests tied to online communications offences in a single year. And instead of treating that as a warning sign, Canada’s political class increasingly talks about it like it’s a model worth copying. That should terrify every Canadian. Because freedom rarely disappears dramatically. It disappears slowly, bureaucratically and under the language of safety and harm reduction. And Carney may actually be more effective at advancing this agenda than Trudeau ever was because Trudeau sounded ideological and flaky. Carney sounds calm, managerial and “evidence-based,” which makes people lower their guard while the state accumulates more power over speech and information. And independent media will obviously be among the first targets. Government-funded outlets like the CBC have very little to fear from censorship systems because they already exist safely inside the approved institutional framework. They support the government because the government supports them. The pressure lands on independent journalists, alternative media and anybody operating outside establishment narratives — because we are skeptics of government. That’s where this road leads: criminalized dissent, self-censorship and a country where ordinary people slowly become afraid to speak honestly because the legal, financial and social consequences become too risky. And once that fear becomes cultural, governments barely need to censor anybody anymore. People start censoring themselves. We need to speak up now, while we still can. Go to

Rebel News

13,811 views • 2 months ago

Here is a question for all of you: Do you believe we should be making it easier for our government to prosecute and jail Canadians based not on their actions – but on their words? To criminalize speech and prosecute those for expressing sincerely held religious beliefs? For me, the answer will always be no. Free speech, free expression and freedom of religion are foundational principles upon which our nation, and Western civilization, is built. I will always defend these fundamental Charter rights. My full speech opposing the Liberal censorship bill, C-9.

Here is a question for all of you: Do you believe we should be making it easier for our government to prosecute and jail Canadians based not on their actions – but on their words? To criminalize speech and prosecute those for expressing sincerely held religious beliefs? For me, the answer will always be no. Free speech, free expression and freedom of religion are foundational principles upon which our nation, and Western civilization, is built. I will always defend these fundamental Charter rights. My full speech opposing the Liberal censorship bill, C-9.

Aaron Gunn

17,272 views • 4 months ago

I tabled a petition from Canadians concerned about Bill C-9. Hate speech is already illegal under sections 318 and 319 of the Criminal Code. Petitioners are not asking for less protection. They are asking Parliament not to remove long-standing safeguards that protect sincerely held beliefs expressed in good faith. Bill C-9 risks expanding government power while weakening important Charter protections. When Canadians take the time to defend their fundamental freedoms, Parliament has a duty to listen.

I tabled a petition from Canadians concerned about Bill C-9. Hate speech is already illegal under sections 318 and 319 of the Criminal Code. Petitioners are not asking for less protection. They are asking Parliament not to remove long-standing safeguards that protect sincerely held beliefs expressed in good faith. Bill C-9 risks expanding government power while weakening important Charter protections. When Canadians take the time to defend their fundamental freedoms, Parliament has a duty to listen.

Dr. Leslyn Lewis

23,199 views • 5 months ago

Today the Federal Government in conjunction with the Coalition and with no resistance from One Nation passed a bill against Hate Speech. They gagged debate again and rammed the laws through with no scrutiny where we could ask questions. This is a direct attack on Free Speech. For the third parliamentary week in a row the major parties have devoted Parliament to controlling you, not serving you, by shutting you down. The Misinformation Law, the Online Safety Bill and now Hate Speech are all designed to censor people and push back on government overreach. The hate speech law is dangerous because it threatens freedom of speech by allowing the government to censor or punish individuals for expressing opinions that might be deemed offensive. Such laws are often vague and subjective, leading to potential abuse and selective enforcement. This creates a chilling effect where people fear speaking openly, stifling debate and free expression. Instead of combating hate, these laws can be weaponized to silence dissent and suppress unpopular viewpoints, ultimately undermining democratic values and individual liberties. People First stood in defence of open discourse, free speech, and the democratic principles that underpin our society. Upholding these values will foster trust and preserve the liberties that Australians hold dear. I am disappointed that One Nation did not stand with me on this issue. These laws extend to all people including children. When a motion was moved to exclude children under 14 from these laws, Malcolm Roberts voted against it. Children should not be penalised for the actions or thoughts of their parents. I challenge Malcolm and Pauline to debate me on the reasons why they support this law. It is government overreach plain and simple. There are already state laws against violence and inciting violence. Under the constitution, the States are responsible for policing crime not the Federal Government. There is no need for these laws. They will only be used to censor you. #auspol

Today the Federal Government in conjunction with the Coalition and with no resistance from One Nation passed a bill against Hate Speech. They gagged debate again and rammed the laws through with no scrutiny where we could ask questions. This is a direct attack on Free Speech. For the third parliamentary week in a row the major parties have devoted Parliament to controlling you, not serving you, by shutting you down. The Misinformation Law, the Online Safety Bill and now Hate Speech are all designed to censor people and push back on government overreach. The hate speech law is dangerous because it threatens freedom of speech by allowing the government to censor or punish individuals for expressing opinions that might be deemed offensive. Such laws are often vague and subjective, leading to potential abuse and selective enforcement. This creates a chilling effect where people fear speaking openly, stifling debate and free expression. Instead of combating hate, these laws can be weaponized to silence dissent and suppress unpopular viewpoints, ultimately undermining democratic values and individual liberties. People First stood in defence of open discourse, free speech, and the democratic principles that underpin our society. Upholding these values will foster trust and preserve the liberties that Australians hold dear. I am disappointed that One Nation did not stand with me on this issue. These laws extend to all people including children. When a motion was moved to exclude children under 14 from these laws, Malcolm Roberts voted against it. Children should not be penalised for the actions or thoughts of their parents. I challenge Malcolm and Pauline to debate me on the reasons why they support this law. It is government overreach plain and simple. There are already state laws against violence and inciting violence. Under the constitution, the States are responsible for policing crime not the Federal Government. There is no need for these laws. They will only be used to censor you. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

177,762 views • 1 year ago

Canada - This isn't a conspiracy theory. It's in the text of Bill C-8. The federal government is quietly giving itself a "kill switch" for your internet and phone. One minister. One order. They can suspend YOUR service. They claim it's for "cybersecurity," but the bill has ZERO protections for free speech, journalists, or citizens exposing government overreach. Your platform, your voice, your ability to speak out—gone with the flick of a switch. This is the moment to push back. 🔻 SHARE THIS. 🔻 TAG YOUR MP. 🔻 STOP BILL C-8.

Canada - This isn't a conspiracy theory. It's in the text of Bill C-8. The federal government is quietly giving itself a "kill switch" for your internet and phone. One minister. One order. They can suspend YOUR service. They claim it's for "cybersecurity," but the bill has ZERO protections for free speech, journalists, or citizens exposing government overreach. Your platform, your voice, your ability to speak out—gone with the flick of a switch. This is the moment to push back. 🔻 SHARE THIS. 🔻 TAG YOUR MP. 🔻 STOP BILL C-8.

Camus

154,645 views • 10 months ago

🇨🇦⚖️🤡 : Justice Minister Sean Fraser admits there are already numerous laws to deal with hate-based crimes but wants to pass another bill to protect Canadians against “hate”. A term Liberals will define and make numerous exemptions for. 🇬🇧🕌It will be used like we see in the UK to target people critical of the government and groups that prey on certain communities, like grooming gangs that target children. The 2 lesbian women attacked by a throng of Muslim men on the streets of Halifax was virtually ignored by the Liberals & NDP. The police arrested no one, despite the violent bloody assault being captured on video. The Muslim youth simply walked away from the police, with only one of the men providing ID. We didn’t need a “hate” bill to protect those women. We needed the police & justice system to act. We have real crimes being committed where the individuals doing the violent assaults are routinely released back into the community. Yesterday I posted about how 40 people in Vancouver were arrested 6,000 times in 1 year. Isn't that an act of hatred to society when people can openly break laws so freely and have no real consequence for it? We have witnessed the glorification of terrorism across Canada for years, including people chanting "Death to Canada", while praising terrorism in Vancouver and our government refused to prosecute those people. So it's flat out absurd to think this Bill is anything more than a targeted assault on free speech and average Canadians who demand accountability for actual hate crimes. Bill C-63 was promoted as protecting children. When the Liberals couldn't ram though their censorship bill based on that, they ditched even pretending it's about protecting kids. They are not trying to pass a bill to protect kids anymore, it's flat out about censorship. Remember Sean Fraser & the Liberals IMPORTED and promoted this hatred we see in Canada. They did it so they could pass laws that stifle real debate and criticism, like we see in the UK.

🇨🇦⚖️🤡 : Justice Minister Sean Fraser admits there are already numerous laws to deal with hate-based crimes but wants to pass another bill to protect Canadians against “hate”. A term Liberals will define and make numerous exemptions for. 🇬🇧🕌It will be used like we see in the UK to target people critical of the government and groups that prey on certain communities, like grooming gangs that target children. The 2 lesbian women attacked by a throng of Muslim men on the streets of Halifax was virtually ignored by the Liberals & NDP. The police arrested no one, despite the violent bloody assault being captured on video. The Muslim youth simply walked away from the police, with only one of the men providing ID. We didn’t need a “hate” bill to protect those women. We needed the police & justice system to act. We have real crimes being committed where the individuals doing the violent assaults are routinely released back into the community. Yesterday I posted about how 40 people in Vancouver were arrested 6,000 times in 1 year. Isn't that an act of hatred to society when people can openly break laws so freely and have no real consequence for it? We have witnessed the glorification of terrorism across Canada for years, including people chanting "Death to Canada", while praising terrorism in Vancouver and our government refused to prosecute those people. So it's flat out absurd to think this Bill is anything more than a targeted assault on free speech and average Canadians who demand accountability for actual hate crimes. Bill C-63 was promoted as protecting children. When the Liberals couldn't ram though their censorship bill based on that, they ditched even pretending it's about protecting kids. They are not trying to pass a bill to protect kids anymore, it's flat out about censorship. Remember Sean Fraser & the Liberals IMPORTED and promoted this hatred we see in Canada. They did it so they could pass laws that stifle real debate and criticism, like we see in the UK.

Bruce McGonigal

109,634 views • 10 months ago