Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Carney was asked about Alberta separation. His warning to Albertans? A “very dangerous bluff.” Then he compared it to Brexit. Interesting. The Bloc said Alberta should decide Alberta’s question. Carney says separation is a dangerous bluff and Ottawa is reviewing the question under the Clarity Act. That contrast tells... show more

The Real Mr Bench

42,447 subscribers

39,217 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Carney warned Alberta about separation. Michelle Rempel Garner fired back with the part Ottawa keeps pretending not to understand. Alberta’s frustration did not appear out of nowhere. Ten years of Liberal policy stymied Alberta energy projects, cost jobs, weakened prosperity, and damaged Canada’s energy security. Now Carney wants to wag his finger? Rempel says he helped start an international banking alliance that shut down Alberta oil and gas. Then he turned around and used Brexit-style fear politics on Albertans. That is not unity. That is exactly how Ottawa made this worse. Some of the most patriotic Canadians in this country are frustrated Albertans. They know a strong Alberta means a strong Canada. But respect is not a speech. It is pipelines. It is repealing the bills that block investment. It is ending the gun grab. It is treating Alberta like part of the country, not a resource colony Ottawa lectures when convenient. Carney wants to talk about unity. Start with humility.

Carney warned Alberta about separation. Michelle Rempel Garner fired back with the part Ottawa keeps pretending not to understand. Alberta’s frustration did not appear out of nowhere. Ten years of Liberal policy stymied Alberta energy projects, cost jobs, weakened prosperity, and damaged Canada’s energy security. Now Carney wants to wag his finger? Rempel says he helped start an international banking alliance that shut down Alberta oil and gas. Then he turned around and used Brexit-style fear politics on Albertans. That is not unity. That is exactly how Ottawa made this worse. Some of the most patriotic Canadians in this country are frustrated Albertans. They know a strong Alberta means a strong Canada. But respect is not a speech. It is pipelines. It is repealing the bills that block investment. It is ending the gun grab. It is treating Alberta like part of the country, not a resource colony Ottawa lectures when convenient. Carney wants to talk about unity. Start with humility.

The Real Mr Bench

12,381 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Quebec gets it. Bloc Québécois House Leader Christine Normandin was asked about Alberta separation and the referendum question. The reporter kept pressing. She refused the bait. Her answer was simple: She is not Albertan. Ottawa is not Albertan. Albertans decide. She even warned against “Papa Ottawa” talking down to people with disdain. For once, I agree with the Bloc. You do not have to support Alberta separation to understand the principle. If Albertans want to ask the question, it is Alberta’s question. Not Ottawa’s. Not federal politicians’. Not some managed national-unity script from people who helped create the anger in the first place.

Quebec gets it. Bloc Québécois House Leader Christine Normandin was asked about Alberta separation and the referendum question. The reporter kept pressing. She refused the bait. Her answer was simple: She is not Albertan. Ottawa is not Albertan. Albertans decide. She even warned against “Papa Ottawa” talking down to people with disdain. For once, I agree with the Bloc. You do not have to support Alberta separation to understand the principle. If Albertans want to ask the question, it is Alberta’s question. Not Ottawa’s. Not federal politicians’. Not some managed national-unity script from people who helped create the anger in the first place.

The Real Mr Bench

52,523 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Pierre Poilievre on Alberta separation and Alberta's treatment by Ottawa: "I'm against separation...the message to the government in Ottawa is you can't tell Alberta to pay up shut up. Albertans want to be a part of united Canada." Well balanced comments but I think people are discounting that too Albertans have heard it before and they don't want to waste any more time. Thoughts?

Pierre Poilievre on Alberta separation and Alberta's treatment by Ottawa: "I'm against separation...the message to the government in Ottawa is you can't tell Alberta to pay up shut up. Albertans want to be a part of united Canada." Well balanced comments but I think people are discounting that too Albertans have heard it before and they don't want to waste any more time. Thoughts?

Kirk Lubimov

213,822 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 OTTAWA AND EDMONTON ARE NOW TRYING TO STOP ALBERTA SEPARATION The Alberta Premier is now openly admitting that independence support is too big to ignore — while simultaneously trying to pull people back toward Ottawa. Listen carefully to what she said: • “35% or more” of ALL Albertans could vote for independence • Around “55%” of UCP supporters support separation • She and Mark Carney are now working together to “bring those numbers down” That last line matters. For years Albertans were told separatism was fringe. Now the Premier herself admits the movement is powerful enough that Ottawa and Edmonton must actively work to stop it growing further. And notice the shift: Suddenly Carney is being framed as “different” from Trudeau. Suddenly there’s talk of “confidence building.” Suddenly promises are being made again. Because the political establishment knows the ground is moving beneath them. The real issue now isn’t whether Alberta frustration exists. It’s whether enough Albertans still believe Canada can be fixed at all.

🚨 OTTAWA AND EDMONTON ARE NOW TRYING TO STOP ALBERTA SEPARATION The Alberta Premier is now openly admitting that independence support is too big to ignore — while simultaneously trying to pull people back toward Ottawa. Listen carefully to what she said: • “35% or more” of ALL Albertans could vote for independence • Around “55%” of UCP supporters support separation • She and Mark Carney are now working together to “bring those numbers down” That last line matters. For years Albertans were told separatism was fringe. Now the Premier herself admits the movement is powerful enough that Ottawa and Edmonton must actively work to stop it growing further. And notice the shift: Suddenly Carney is being framed as “different” from Trudeau. Suddenly there’s talk of “confidence building.” Suddenly promises are being made again. Because the political establishment knows the ground is moving beneath them. The real issue now isn’t whether Alberta frustration exists. It’s whether enough Albertans still believe Canada can be fixed at all.

Jim Ferguson

42,366 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Quebec got referendums. Alberta gets courtroom lectures. Rebel News asked Danielle Smith if Albertans are treated differently than other Canadians. Smith pointed to democratic rights, the Constitution, the Clarity Act, and Quebec. That is the part Ottawa hates. Equal treatment should not require an appeal. Unless the province asking is Alberta. @rebel

Quebec got referendums. Alberta gets courtroom lectures. Rebel News asked Danielle Smith if Albertans are treated differently than other Canadians. Smith pointed to democratic rights, the Constitution, the Clarity Act, and Quebec. That is the part Ottawa hates. Equal treatment should not require an appeal. Unless the province asking is Alberta. @rebel

The Real Mr Bench

25,126 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Here is Danielle Smith’s response to Carney calling the referendum a “dangerous bluff” Carney in my opinion should never have said what he said. He needs to stay out of Provincial matters and let the process proceed without his rhetoric.

Here is Danielle Smith’s response to Carney calling the referendum a “dangerous bluff” Carney in my opinion should never have said what he said. He needs to stay out of Provincial matters and let the process proceed without his rhetoric.

Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

65,947 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Carney: This is a real referendum. It's not, you know, a question about a question, free option. It's a dangerous bluff. We're literally at 10 years anniversary of Brexit ... and you see what's happened in the United Kingdom. It's very reminiscent.

Carney: This is a real referendum. It's not, you know, a question about a question, free option. It's a dangerous bluff. We're literally at 10 years anniversary of Brexit ... and you see what's happened in the United Kingdom. It's very reminiscent.

Scott Robertson

112,390 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Mark Carney has now made it obvious: Ottawa will use the Clarity Act as a gatekeeping tool against Alberta independence. Quebec responded to the Clarity Act with Bill 99, a law asserting Quebec’s right to self-determination, defending the authority of its National Assembly, and recognizing that a referendum is decided by a majority of valid votes cast. Alberta needs its own Bill 99. The future of Alberta should be decided by Albertans, not by the House of Commons.

Mark Carney has now made it obvious: Ottawa will use the Clarity Act as a gatekeeping tool against Alberta independence. Quebec responded to the Clarity Act with Bill 99, a law asserting Quebec’s right to self-determination, defending the authority of its National Assembly, and recognizing that a referendum is decided by a majority of valid votes cast. Alberta needs its own Bill 99. The future of Alberta should be decided by Albertans, not by the House of Commons.

Rise Of Alberta

77,026 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

This might be the worst possible thing you could say. Carney called Alberta's separation referendum a “dangerous bluff.” That is exactly the WRONG thing to say to a province that has spent ten years airing every grievance the Liberals wouldn't listen to. When someone tells you they want out, you don't accuse them of bluffing. You ask “what went wrong?” And work on reconciling those differences. Instead, Carney chose to call it a bluff. It will be the most expensive misread of a room in this country's history.

This might be the worst possible thing you could say. Carney called Alberta's separation referendum a “dangerous bluff.” That is exactly the WRONG thing to say to a province that has spent ten years airing every grievance the Liberals wouldn't listen to. When someone tells you they want out, you don't accuse them of bluffing. You ask “what went wrong?” And work on reconciling those differences. Instead, Carney chose to call it a bluff. It will be the most expensive misread of a room in this country's history.

Mario Zelaya

31,739 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 ALBERTA INDEPENDENCE MOMENTUM EXPLODES Independence organizer Jeffery Rath tells says that Jason Kenney and Mark Carney are the best salesmen Alberta independence could ever ask for — moments before the largest independence rally in Alberta’s history. Hundreds of volunteers. Thousands lining up. Petitions flying. Rath says every time Carney opens his mouth, more Albertans join the movement — including immigrants who know exactly what centralized control leads to. This isn’t fringe anymore. This is a political force Ottawa can’t ignore. Jeffrey Rath

🚨 ALBERTA INDEPENDENCE MOMENTUM EXPLODES Independence organizer Jeffery Rath tells says that Jason Kenney and Mark Carney are the best salesmen Alberta independence could ever ask for — moments before the largest independence rally in Alberta’s history. Hundreds of volunteers. Thousands lining up. Petitions flying. Rath says every time Carney opens his mouth, more Albertans join the movement — including immigrants who know exactly what centralized control leads to. This isn’t fringe anymore. This is a political force Ottawa can’t ignore. Jeffrey Rath

Jim Ferguson

18,907 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Carney was asked about people bringing “animosities” to Canada. His answer should stop every Canadian for a second. It depends if your animosity is illegal. Then he says Bill C-9 will soon be law. So here is the real question: Who decides when your opinion becomes hate? Who decides when your anger becomes intimidation? Who decides when your “animosity” becomes a crime? Ottawa does. That is the whole point.

Carney was asked about people bringing “animosities” to Canada. His answer should stop every Canadian for a second. It depends if your animosity is illegal. Then he says Bill C-9 will soon be law. So here is the real question: Who decides when your opinion becomes hate? Who decides when your anger becomes intimidation? Who decides when your “animosity” becomes a crime? Ottawa does. That is the whole point.

The Real Mr Bench

30,341 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 Alberta just dropped the nuclear option. As an Ontarian I am ENVIOUS of Premiers like Danielle Smith instead we have Liberal Doug Ford 🤦🏻‍♂️ that ONLY decides to act like a Conservative when something affects HIM personally. Premier Danielle Smith announced a public vote on October 19th: Should Alberta hold a referendum to SEPARATE from Canada? Mark Carney’s immediate response? “Dangerous bluff. Just like Brexit. You’ll regret it.” Translation: Ottawa doesn’t want Alberta keeping its own money. Here’s the brutal reality the Laurentian elite never talk about: Alberta = Canada’s Texas. Oil. Agriculture. Hard work. They generate the surplus… and Ottawa takes it via equalization payments and ships it to Quebec, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Manitoba — provinces that “can’t carry their own weight” because of decades of Liberal policies. Look at the chart (timestamp ~2:50). Alberta’s bar sticks out like a sore thumb while the have-not provinces line up for their cheque. This isn’t “unity.” This is wealth transfer on steroids. Albertans are tired of: - Funding policies they never voted for - Watching their resource wealth subsidize Ontario/Quebec priorities - Being told they’re the problem Two completely different value systems. Two different countries in all but name. Carney can call it a “bluff” all he wants. Canadians are waking up to the math: Your paycheque is being raided twice — once federally, and again provincially through this rigged system. Alberta isn’t asking permission anymore. Drop your take below: Should Alberta get the referendum? Should they actually leave? Or is Carney right and this is all just “regret later”? #AlbertaSeparation #Wexit #EqualizationTheft #MarkCarney #cdnpoli #CanadaDivided #DanielleSmith #PBDPodcast

🚨 Alberta just dropped the nuclear option. As an Ontarian I am ENVIOUS of Premiers like Danielle Smith instead we have Liberal Doug Ford 🤦🏻‍♂️ that ONLY decides to act like a Conservative when something affects HIM personally. Premier Danielle Smith announced a public vote on October 19th: Should Alberta hold a referendum to SEPARATE from Canada? Mark Carney’s immediate response? “Dangerous bluff. Just like Brexit. You’ll regret it.” Translation: Ottawa doesn’t want Alberta keeping its own money. Here’s the brutal reality the Laurentian elite never talk about: Alberta = Canada’s Texas. Oil. Agriculture. Hard work. They generate the surplus… and Ottawa takes it via equalization payments and ships it to Quebec, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Manitoba — provinces that “can’t carry their own weight” because of decades of Liberal policies. Look at the chart (timestamp ~2:50). Alberta’s bar sticks out like a sore thumb while the have-not provinces line up for their cheque. This isn’t “unity.” This is wealth transfer on steroids. Albertans are tired of: - Funding policies they never voted for - Watching their resource wealth subsidize Ontario/Quebec priorities - Being told they’re the problem Two completely different value systems. Two different countries in all but name. Carney can call it a “bluff” all he wants. Canadians are waking up to the math: Your paycheque is being raided twice — once federally, and again provincially through this rigged system. Alberta isn’t asking permission anymore. Drop your take below: Should Alberta get the referendum? Should they actually leave? Or is Carney right and this is all just “regret later”? #AlbertaSeparation #Wexit #EqualizationTheft #MarkCarney #cdnpoli #CanadaDivided #DanielleSmith #PBDPodcast

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

26,788 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Mark Carney just dropped his "impassioned" plea for Canadian unity He spent 3 minutes droning about "cooperative federalism," "common ground," "social programs," and how voting Yes is a "dangerous bluff" like Brexit/Quebec. Zero fire. Zero emotion. All it was missing was a heartfelt reference to the appendix "Albertans... we must stay united... for the appendix... it belongs to the body politic..." This is the guy who wants to lead Canada? Sounds more like he’s reading the Bank of Canada monetary policy statement at a funeral 🤦‍♂️ Even the separatists are yawning Mark Carney

Mark Carney just dropped his "impassioned" plea for Canadian unity He spent 3 minutes droning about "cooperative federalism," "common ground," "social programs," and how voting Yes is a "dangerous bluff" like Brexit/Quebec. Zero fire. Zero emotion. All it was missing was a heartfelt reference to the appendix "Albertans... we must stay united... for the appendix... it belongs to the body politic..." This is the guy who wants to lead Canada? Sounds more like he’s reading the Bank of Canada monetary policy statement at a funeral 🤦‍♂️ Even the separatists are yawning Mark Carney

cbcwatcher

21,551 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I was in Rocky Mountain House recently for a massive pro Alberta independence rally. Hundreds of people were waving Alberta flags and driving around town, and I found a small group of about seven pro-Canada counter protesters and decided to engage them. One man challenged me. He said that if Alberta independence loses, I should give up. I told him plainly that yes, if we lose, I will respect the will of the voters. Then I asked him the same question back. If Alberta wins, will you accept it? He reluctantly said yes, but the moment I pressed him on what percentage he would accept, he would not even engage with the argument. He would not clearly accept a majority. That tells you a lot. For too many on the pro-Canada side, this is not really about democracy. It is about imposing their will on Albertans who disagree with them, then using shame and fear to pressure us into silence. The second part of his argument was that the independence movement is hurting investment in Alberta. My answer was that Ottawa already did that and we have nothing to loose. For years, federal policy has blocked pipelines, restricted market access, and damaged confidence in Alberta’s future. Then, when Albertans finally start pushing back, we are told that we are the problem. He even claimed there is no tanker ban. That is factually false. Canada’s Oil Tanker Moratorium Act does restrict large crude oil and persistent-oil tankers from stopping, loading, or unloading at ports on BC’s north coast. The details matter, but the broader point stands: Ottawa has put real barriers in the way of Alberta getting its resources to market. His response was basically, if that is true, then why is Alberta still so rich and prosperous? My answer was simple: because we work hard, we have a lot going for us, and it takes a lot to sink us. But that does not prove Canada is working. It proves Alberta is strong enough to keep carrying a country that keeps dragging us down. Canada feels more and more like a sinking ship, and Alberta is the last thing holding it up. That is why I support independence. Please sign the petition. Go to to find a signing location near you. See the full video on YouTube here:

I was in Rocky Mountain House recently for a massive pro Alberta independence rally. Hundreds of people were waving Alberta flags and driving around town, and I found a small group of about seven pro-Canada counter protesters and decided to engage them. One man challenged me. He said that if Alberta independence loses, I should give up. I told him plainly that yes, if we lose, I will respect the will of the voters. Then I asked him the same question back. If Alberta wins, will you accept it? He reluctantly said yes, but the moment I pressed him on what percentage he would accept, he would not even engage with the argument. He would not clearly accept a majority. That tells you a lot. For too many on the pro-Canada side, this is not really about democracy. It is about imposing their will on Albertans who disagree with them, then using shame and fear to pressure us into silence. The second part of his argument was that the independence movement is hurting investment in Alberta. My answer was that Ottawa already did that and we have nothing to loose. For years, federal policy has blocked pipelines, restricted market access, and damaged confidence in Alberta’s future. Then, when Albertans finally start pushing back, we are told that we are the problem. He even claimed there is no tanker ban. That is factually false. Canada’s Oil Tanker Moratorium Act does restrict large crude oil and persistent-oil tankers from stopping, loading, or unloading at ports on BC’s north coast. The details matter, but the broader point stands: Ottawa has put real barriers in the way of Alberta getting its resources to market. His response was basically, if that is true, then why is Alberta still so rich and prosperous? My answer was simple: because we work hard, we have a lot going for us, and it takes a lot to sink us. But that does not prove Canada is working. It proves Alberta is strong enough to keep carrying a country that keeps dragging us down. Canada feels more and more like a sinking ship, and Alberta is the last thing holding it up. That is why I support independence. Please sign the petition. Go to to find a signing location near you. See the full video on YouTube here:

Jon Alberta Patriot

14,425 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Carney: I was a teenager in Edmonton when the National Energy Program was introduced, and I remember how Ottawa made Albertans feel like our resources weren't our own. And then more recently, we're made to feel that our energy contributions were running against the tides of history.

Carney: I was a teenager in Edmonton when the National Energy Program was introduced, and I remember how Ottawa made Albertans feel like our resources weren't our own. And then more recently, we're made to feel that our energy contributions were running against the tides of history.

Scott Robertson

70,510 просмотров • 28 дней назад

Howard Anglin "While the separatists don't have answers to most of the key questions about separation, I think there are a lot of people in central Canada and Ottawa that need to step up and give some answers to the questions Alberta has been asking." "The attitude from some in central Canada, the barely concealed contempt and sometimes the open open contempt for the Alberta economy and the way of life in Alberta is something that wouldn't be tolerated with any other province." "At the end of the day, the vast majority of Albertans love Alberta and they love Canada. I'm not sure a lot of people in Ottawa can say the same thing." Howard Anglin

Howard Anglin "While the separatists don't have answers to most of the key questions about separation, I think there are a lot of people in central Canada and Ottawa that need to step up and give some answers to the questions Alberta has been asking." "The attitude from some in central Canada, the barely concealed contempt and sometimes the open open contempt for the Alberta economy and the way of life in Alberta is something that wouldn't be tolerated with any other province." "At the end of the day, the vast majority of Albertans love Alberta and they love Canada. I'm not sure a lot of people in Ottawa can say the same thing." Howard Anglin

cbcwatcher

27,675 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

"It is often advanced that vote for this and you will strengthen our hand in future negotiations, and that's a very dangerous bluff." Mark Carney likens Alberta's sovereignty referendum to Brexit, saying voters run the risk of being left with a bad hand they didn't mean to vote for.

"It is often advanced that vote for this and you will strengthen our hand in future negotiations, and that's a very dangerous bluff." Mark Carney likens Alberta's sovereignty referendum to Brexit, saying voters run the risk of being left with a bad hand they didn't mean to vote for.

Courtney Theriault

67,300 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 ALBERTA AWAKENS — THE WEST REMEMBERS WHO IT IS Something historic is stirring on the Canadian plains. Not protest. Not complaint. But resolve. For decades, Alberta has powered Canada while being ruled by a distant political class in Ottawa that neither understands nor respects it. The deal was simple: Alberta would produce, Ottawa would decide. And year after year, that deal bled the province dry. Now, Alberta is asking the question no one was supposed to ask: Why do we stay? Alberta is not poor. Alberta is not dependent. Alberta is not fragile. It is one of the most resource-rich regions in the Western world. • Vast oil and gas reserves • Critical minerals and rare earths • Timber, agriculture, and energy infrastructure • A highly skilled workforce • A culture built on production, not bureaucracy If Alberta were a country, it would rank among the wealthiest per capita on Earth. And unlike Ottawa, Alberta actually creates wealth. For years, that wealth has been siphoned off through equalization payments, federal regulation, and policies written for urban centres thousands of miles away — policies that punish energy, restrict land use, and criminalise the very industries that made the nation viable. Albertans have watched their rights curtailed. Their livelihoods targeted. Their values dismissed as backward. And still, they paid the bills. Until now. A new generation of leaders and citizens are openly challenging Ottawa’s grip — not with anger, but with clarity. They are pointing out an obvious truth: Alberta does not need permission to succeed. It already feeds, powers, and funds the country. Independence is no longer unthinkable. It is being discussed seriously, methodically, and confidently. Because Alberta has something Ottawa cannot manufacture: • Economic leverage • Cultural cohesion • Energy sovereignty • And the will to stand alone History shows that nations are not born from chaos — they are born when productive regions refuse to be ruled by systems that drain them. Alberta is reaching that moment. Not in haste. Not in hatred. But in strength. This is not a threat. It is a reckoning. And if Alberta does choose its own path, the world may soon witness something rare in modern politics: A wealthy, capable, freedom-minded people stepping out from under a collapsing centre — not to burn bridges, but to finally build their own future. The West is remembering who it is. And Ottawa can feel it. Jason Coursey

🚨 ALBERTA AWAKENS — THE WEST REMEMBERS WHO IT IS Something historic is stirring on the Canadian plains. Not protest. Not complaint. But resolve. For decades, Alberta has powered Canada while being ruled by a distant political class in Ottawa that neither understands nor respects it. The deal was simple: Alberta would produce, Ottawa would decide. And year after year, that deal bled the province dry. Now, Alberta is asking the question no one was supposed to ask: Why do we stay? Alberta is not poor. Alberta is not dependent. Alberta is not fragile. It is one of the most resource-rich regions in the Western world. • Vast oil and gas reserves • Critical minerals and rare earths • Timber, agriculture, and energy infrastructure • A highly skilled workforce • A culture built on production, not bureaucracy If Alberta were a country, it would rank among the wealthiest per capita on Earth. And unlike Ottawa, Alberta actually creates wealth. For years, that wealth has been siphoned off through equalization payments, federal regulation, and policies written for urban centres thousands of miles away — policies that punish energy, restrict land use, and criminalise the very industries that made the nation viable. Albertans have watched their rights curtailed. Their livelihoods targeted. Their values dismissed as backward. And still, they paid the bills. Until now. A new generation of leaders and citizens are openly challenging Ottawa’s grip — not with anger, but with clarity. They are pointing out an obvious truth: Alberta does not need permission to succeed. It already feeds, powers, and funds the country. Independence is no longer unthinkable. It is being discussed seriously, methodically, and confidently. Because Alberta has something Ottawa cannot manufacture: • Economic leverage • Cultural cohesion • Energy sovereignty • And the will to stand alone History shows that nations are not born from chaos — they are born when productive regions refuse to be ruled by systems that drain them. Alberta is reaching that moment. Not in haste. Not in hatred. But in strength. This is not a threat. It is a reckoning. And if Alberta does choose its own path, the world may soon witness something rare in modern politics: A wealthy, capable, freedom-minded people stepping out from under a collapsing centre — not to burn bridges, but to finally build their own future. The West is remembering who it is. And Ottawa can feel it. Jason Coursey

Jim Ferguson

342,413 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

At first, I was angry about Danielle Smith’s referendum question. It felt like Alberta independence supporters were being denied the direct yes-or-no vote many of us wanted. But after cooling down, I started to see the strategy. If we cannot win a vote on whether Albertans should even have a referendum, then we probably could not have won the direct independence vote anyway. This new question gives fence sitters a third option. People who are frustrated with Ottawa, equalization, pipelines, taxes, the economy, woke policies, and federal overreach, but who are not quite ready to vote yes on independence, can still vote to have the referendum. They can send a message to Ottawa now. And make up their mind later. Watch the full video here:

At first, I was angry about Danielle Smith’s referendum question. It felt like Alberta independence supporters were being denied the direct yes-or-no vote many of us wanted. But after cooling down, I started to see the strategy. If we cannot win a vote on whether Albertans should even have a referendum, then we probably could not have won the direct independence vote anyway. This new question gives fence sitters a third option. People who are frustrated with Ottawa, equalization, pipelines, taxes, the economy, woke policies, and federal overreach, but who are not quite ready to vote yes on independence, can still vote to have the referendum. They can send a message to Ottawa now. And make up their mind later. Watch the full video here:

Jon Alberta Patriot

12,488 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The Conservative Party has an Alberta problem — a big one It's not because Alberta has abandoned the Conservatives, but because Alberta's Conservative voters might be outgrowing Ottawa, and we have the poll numbers to prove it. A new @ActForAlberta poll shows something remarkable: 66% of Conservative Party of Canada supporters in Alberta support independence; 51% strongly support it. Another 15% somewhat support it. That is not a fringe. That is not a handful of angry keyboard warriors. That is the federal Conservatives' Western engine room looking at Confederation and saying: maybe this deal is done. And that explains something important about the way Pierre Poilievre and the federal Conservatives talk about Alberta independence. They oppose it, of course. They have to. The Conservative Party of Canada cannot win without Alberta. Take Alberta out of Confederation and the CPC loses its safest seats, its donor base, its volunteer army, and its moral claim to represent Western Canada. Without Alberta, there may never be another Conservative government in Ottawa again. So yes, they are against independence. But notice what they are not doing. They are not going full Liberal-style Project Fear. They are not screaming that Albertans are stupid, racist, reckless, dangerous separatists who need to be shamed back into line. Why? Because they can read a poll. If two-thirds of your own Alberta supporters back independence, you cannot sneer at them without blowing up your own base. You cannot smear them as extremists when they are your riding presidents, your donors, your door-knockers, your sign crews, your voters. So, the CPC is trapped. Ottawa needs Alberta to stay. But Alberta conservatives are increasingly asking: what exactly are we staying for?

The Conservative Party has an Alberta problem — a big one It's not because Alberta has abandoned the Conservatives, but because Alberta's Conservative voters might be outgrowing Ottawa, and we have the poll numbers to prove it. A new @ActForAlberta poll shows something remarkable: 66% of Conservative Party of Canada supporters in Alberta support independence; 51% strongly support it. Another 15% somewhat support it. That is not a fringe. That is not a handful of angry keyboard warriors. That is the federal Conservatives' Western engine room looking at Confederation and saying: maybe this deal is done. And that explains something important about the way Pierre Poilievre and the federal Conservatives talk about Alberta independence. They oppose it, of course. They have to. The Conservative Party of Canada cannot win without Alberta. Take Alberta out of Confederation and the CPC loses its safest seats, its donor base, its volunteer army, and its moral claim to represent Western Canada. Without Alberta, there may never be another Conservative government in Ottawa again. So yes, they are against independence. But notice what they are not doing. They are not going full Liberal-style Project Fear. They are not screaming that Albertans are stupid, racist, reckless, dangerous separatists who need to be shamed back into line. Why? Because they can read a poll. If two-thirds of your own Alberta supporters back independence, you cannot sneer at them without blowing up your own base. You cannot smear them as extremists when they are your riding presidents, your donors, your door-knockers, your sign crews, your voters. So, the CPC is trapped. Ottawa needs Alberta to stay. But Alberta conservatives are increasingly asking: what exactly are we staying for?

Rebel News

27,753 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад