Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

This might be the worst possible thing you could say. Carney called Alberta's separation referendum a “dangerous bluff.” That is exactly the WRONG thing to say to a province that has spent ten years airing every grievance the Liberals wouldn't listen to. When someone tells you they want out,... show more

Mario Zelaya

114,852 subscribers

31,826 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

"It is often advanced that vote for this and you will strengthen our hand in future negotiations, and that's a very dangerous bluff." Mark Carney likens Alberta's sovereignty referendum to Brexit, saying voters run the risk of being left with a bad hand they didn't mean to vote for.

"It is often advanced that vote for this and you will strengthen our hand in future negotiations, and that's a very dangerous bluff." Mark Carney likens Alberta's sovereignty referendum to Brexit, saying voters run the risk of being left with a bad hand they didn't mean to vote for.

Courtney Theriault

67,455 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Carney was asked about Alberta separation. His warning to Albertans? A “very dangerous bluff.” Then he compared it to Brexit. Interesting. The Bloc said Alberta should decide Alberta’s question. Carney says separation is a dangerous bluff and Ottawa is reviewing the question under the Clarity Act. That contrast tells you everything. Albertans are not angry because Ottawa listens too much. They are angry because Ottawa lectures, judges, reviews, delays, blocks, taxes, and then acts shocked when the country starts cracking. Then Carney calls the anger a bluff. That should go well.

Carney was asked about Alberta separation. His warning to Albertans? A “very dangerous bluff.” Then he compared it to Brexit. Interesting. The Bloc said Alberta should decide Alberta’s question. Carney says separation is a dangerous bluff and Ottawa is reviewing the question under the Clarity Act. That contrast tells you everything. Albertans are not angry because Ottawa listens too much. They are angry because Ottawa lectures, judges, reviews, delays, blocks, taxes, and then acts shocked when the country starts cracking. Then Carney calls the anger a bluff. That should go well.

The Real Mr Bench

39,217 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

When schools ask little girls what they want to be when they grow up, they could say, a doctor, a lawyer, an engineer, but the one thing they can’t say …..is a mother. Because the response will be don’t you want to be more than “just a mother?” Now, why do you think that is?

When schools ask little girls what they want to be when they grow up, they could say, a doctor, a lawyer, an engineer, but the one thing they can’t say …..is a mother. Because the response will be don’t you want to be more than “just a mother?” Now, why do you think that is?

Brett Pike

42,371 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Partners think that by discussing money, it may signal the wrong thing. It may be that they don't have any and they don't want to disclose that, or it may be that they have a bad financial past. And yet, that's exactly what you wanna know. I mean, you have to deal with this problem. And I would argue that if every couple went through the prenup experience, it would actually build a better foundation for marriage.

Partners think that by discussing money, it may signal the wrong thing. It may be that they don't have any and they don't want to disclose that, or it may be that they have a bad financial past. And yet, that's exactly what you wanna know. I mean, you have to deal with this problem. And I would argue that if every couple went through the prenup experience, it would actually build a better foundation for marriage.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

21,681 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Deep down inside, every one of us wants to go to Heaven. And if you asked most people how to get there, they’d say some version of the same thing — “Live a good life. Be a decent person. Do more good than bad.” Sounds reasonable. Feels right. But what if conventional wisdom is completely wrong on this one? What if everything you’ve been told about how to get to Heaven — is actually keeping you from it? In the next sixty seconds, I want to share something that just might be the most important thing you hear today. Watch this. 👇

Deep down inside, every one of us wants to go to Heaven. And if you asked most people how to get there, they’d say some version of the same thing — “Live a good life. Be a decent person. Do more good than bad.” Sounds reasonable. Feels right. But what if conventional wisdom is completely wrong on this one? What if everything you’ve been told about how to get to Heaven — is actually keeping you from it? In the next sixty seconds, I want to share something that just might be the most important thing you hear today. Watch this. 👇

Greg Laurie

13,338 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

This is the most enjoyable interview a Prime Minister of Canada has EVER given. Here's a snippet but you must listen to the whole thing. Carney and Nardwuar talk music. Carney is obsessed with punk rock. The breadth of his knowledge will shock you:

This is the most enjoyable interview a Prime Minister of Canada has EVER given. Here's a snippet but you must listen to the whole thing. Carney and Nardwuar talk music. Carney is obsessed with punk rock. The breadth of his knowledge will shock you:

Michael Gerald Gibbs🏳️‍🌈🍁 🇺🇦 (He/Him)

680,163 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Jordan Peterson: "If you can't fix your room, you can't fix your life" "Why should you even bother improving yourself? The answer is something like: so you don't suffer anymore stupidly than you have to. And maybe so others don't have to either. It's not some casual self-help doctrine. If you don't organize yourself properly, you'll pay for it. In a big way. And so will the people around you." Peterson continues: "You can say, 'Well, I don't care about that.' But that's actually not true, you do care about it. Because if you're in pain, you will care about it. It's very rare that you can find someone in excruciating pain who would say, 'Well, it would be no better if I was out of this.' Pain brings the idea that it would be better if it didn't exist along with it. It's incontrovertible." On how to start: "Look around for something that bothers you and see if you can fix it. You can do this in a room. Sit in your bedroom and think: 'If I wanted to spend ten minutes making this room better, what would I have to do?' You have to ask yourself that, it's a genuine question. And things will pop out. There's a stack of papers bugging you. Some rubbish behind your computer monitor you haven't attended to for six months. Cables tangled up." He explains why this matters: "If you were coming to see me for psychotherapy, the easiest thing would be to get you to organize your room. You think, is that psychotherapy? It depends on how you conceive the limits of your being. Start where you can start. If something announces itself as in need of repair that you could repair, fix it. Fix a hundred things like that, your life will be a lot different." On fixing what you repeat every day: "People tend to think of their daily routines as trivial. You get up, brush your teeth, have breakfast. Those probably constitute 50% of your life. People think, they're mundane, I don't need to pay attention to them. No, that's exactly wrong. The things you do every day are the most important things you do. Hands down. Just do the arithmetic." On staying within your competence: "Sometimes you don't know how to fix something. Imagine you're walking down the street and there's a guy who's alcoholic and schizophrenic and has been homeless for ten years. That's a problem. It would be good if you could fix it, but you haven't got a clue. You walk around that and go find something you could fix. Just because something announces itself as in need of repair doesn't mean it's you, right then and there, who should repair it. You have to have some humility. You don't walk up to a helicopter that isn't working and just start tinkering away." Peterson shares the key insight: "As soon as you give your mind a genuine aim, it'll reconfigure the world in keeping with that aim. That's actually how you see to begin with. You've all seen the video where you watch basketballs being tossed back and forth, and while you're doing that, a gorilla walks into the middle of the video and you don't see it. If you thought about that experiment for five years, that would be about the right amount of time to spend thinking about it." He explains what it reveals: "What it shows you is that you see what you aim at. If you can get one thing through your head, that would be a good one. You see what you aim at. One inference you might draw from that is: be careful what you aim at. What you aim at determines the way the world manifests itself to you. So if the world is manifesting itself in a very negative way, one thing to ask is: are you aiming at the right thing?"

Jordan Peterson: "If you can't fix your room, you can't fix your life" "Why should you even bother improving yourself? The answer is something like: so you don't suffer anymore stupidly than you have to. And maybe so others don't have to either. It's not some casual self-help doctrine. If you don't organize yourself properly, you'll pay for it. In a big way. And so will the people around you." Peterson continues: "You can say, 'Well, I don't care about that.' But that's actually not true, you do care about it. Because if you're in pain, you will care about it. It's very rare that you can find someone in excruciating pain who would say, 'Well, it would be no better if I was out of this.' Pain brings the idea that it would be better if it didn't exist along with it. It's incontrovertible." On how to start: "Look around for something that bothers you and see if you can fix it. You can do this in a room. Sit in your bedroom and think: 'If I wanted to spend ten minutes making this room better, what would I have to do?' You have to ask yourself that, it's a genuine question. And things will pop out. There's a stack of papers bugging you. Some rubbish behind your computer monitor you haven't attended to for six months. Cables tangled up." He explains why this matters: "If you were coming to see me for psychotherapy, the easiest thing would be to get you to organize your room. You think, is that psychotherapy? It depends on how you conceive the limits of your being. Start where you can start. If something announces itself as in need of repair that you could repair, fix it. Fix a hundred things like that, your life will be a lot different." On fixing what you repeat every day: "People tend to think of their daily routines as trivial. You get up, brush your teeth, have breakfast. Those probably constitute 50% of your life. People think, they're mundane, I don't need to pay attention to them. No, that's exactly wrong. The things you do every day are the most important things you do. Hands down. Just do the arithmetic." On staying within your competence: "Sometimes you don't know how to fix something. Imagine you're walking down the street and there's a guy who's alcoholic and schizophrenic and has been homeless for ten years. That's a problem. It would be good if you could fix it, but you haven't got a clue. You walk around that and go find something you could fix. Just because something announces itself as in need of repair doesn't mean it's you, right then and there, who should repair it. You have to have some humility. You don't walk up to a helicopter that isn't working and just start tinkering away." Peterson shares the key insight: "As soon as you give your mind a genuine aim, it'll reconfigure the world in keeping with that aim. That's actually how you see to begin with. You've all seen the video where you watch basketballs being tossed back and forth, and while you're doing that, a gorilla walks into the middle of the video and you don't see it. If you thought about that experiment for five years, that would be about the right amount of time to spend thinking about it." He explains what it reveals: "What it shows you is that you see what you aim at. If you can get one thing through your head, that would be a good one. You see what you aim at. One inference you might draw from that is: be careful what you aim at. What you aim at determines the way the world manifests itself to you. So if the world is manifesting itself in a very negative way, one thing to ask is: are you aiming at the right thing?"

Jaynit

68,799 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Cobie explains how he finds the next big thing in Crypto “I’ve never known what the next thing is gonna be, if you told me it would be pictures of apes in 2020, I would’ve said that doesn’t sound right” “My mental model is you isolate your risk and you try novel things… instead of trying to figure out why something won’t work, you might as well give it a go” “If you did this with Hyperliquid, you ended up a millionaire from the airdrop… same with FriendTech and buying ape pictures” “People’s instinct is to say this is stupid and won’t work but you need to invert that and ask what if this worked?” “Every time I see something weird, I just give it a go and try to figure out if it’s a new thing that’s gonna be important”

Cobie explains how he finds the next big thing in Crypto “I’ve never known what the next thing is gonna be, if you told me it would be pictures of apes in 2020, I would’ve said that doesn’t sound right” “My mental model is you isolate your risk and you try novel things… instead of trying to figure out why something won’t work, you might as well give it a go” “If you did this with Hyperliquid, you ended up a millionaire from the airdrop… same with FriendTech and buying ape pictures” “People’s instinct is to say this is stupid and won’t work but you need to invert that and ask what if this worked?” “Every time I see something weird, I just give it a go and try to figure out if it’s a new thing that’s gonna be important”

Jack

157,180 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

SEN. KELLY: I've spent 15 years working with Russian cosmonauts. Took me 5 years to understand what motivated them. Number one, appearance that they were in charge of something. Two, who to blame when something goes wrong. Three, what to steal today. Only four, mission success. I think as Ukrainians, as Americans, as Brits, we're often motivated by mission success. You want organization you work for to be successful, you want your country to be successful, you want British Army to be successful, I want US Navy to be successful, I want NASA to be successful. That wasn't my experience with Russian cosmonauts I worked with. I'm talking about dozens of people that I knew well, what motivated them when they went to work every day. At the top of the list was that they really cared about the appearance that they were in charge of something, not mission success. Now, whether they were really actually in charge of it or not didn't matter so much. Mission success wasn't even number two. Number two on the list, I would say, was whether they knew who to blame when something went wrong, like placing the blame. Russians have a position in their Mission Control Center which is called "mistakes officer." When a Russian cosmonaut makes a mistake, they keep track of it and they take money out of their pay. I would say the third thing, even before mission success, was what am I going to steal from my employer today. And we would talk about that. They were very open about this. And apparently there's a saying in Russian that if you didn't steal something at work that day, you did not have a good day. For us, and I think everybody in this room here, mission success is the thing that matters more than anything else. And for the Russians I worked with, it might have been number four on the list. So I actually was not that surprised about their incompetence.

SEN. KELLY: I've spent 15 years working with Russian cosmonauts. Took me 5 years to understand what motivated them. Number one, appearance that they were in charge of something. Two, who to blame when something goes wrong. Three, what to steal today. Only four, mission success. I think as Ukrainians, as Americans, as Brits, we're often motivated by mission success. You want organization you work for to be successful, you want your country to be successful, you want British Army to be successful, I want US Navy to be successful, I want NASA to be successful. That wasn't my experience with Russian cosmonauts I worked with. I'm talking about dozens of people that I knew well, what motivated them when they went to work every day. At the top of the list was that they really cared about the appearance that they were in charge of something, not mission success. Now, whether they were really actually in charge of it or not didn't matter so much. Mission success wasn't even number two. Number two on the list, I would say, was whether they knew who to blame when something went wrong, like placing the blame. Russians have a position in their Mission Control Center which is called "mistakes officer." When a Russian cosmonaut makes a mistake, they keep track of it and they take money out of their pay. I would say the third thing, even before mission success, was what am I going to steal from my employer today. And we would talk about that. They were very open about this. And apparently there's a saying in Russian that if you didn't steal something at work that day, you did not have a good day. For us, and I think everybody in this room here, mission success is the thing that matters more than anything else. And for the Russians I worked with, it might have been number four on the list. So I actually was not that surprised about their incompetence.

Kate from Kharkiv

288,466 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Selling Your Soul In Hollywood. "Yes, it's very real, it's a very spiritual thing." "There's definitely a "THEY," there's FACTIONS and you know, SECRET SOCITIES." "If you make that wrong choice and then if you don't play ball with what they want to do, you know, THEY'LL take you out, that's the sad thing." "You don't have a say, you just do what "THEY" tell you to do." "When the collection happens, it happens" - Omar Gooding cc: Dialogue

Sensitive content

Selling Your Soul In Hollywood. "Yes, it's very real, it's a very spiritual thing." "There's definitely a "THEY," there's FACTIONS and you know, SECRET SOCITIES." "If you make that wrong choice and then if you don't play ball with what they want to do, you know, THEY'LL take you out, that's the sad thing." "You don't have a say, you just do what "THEY" tell you to do." "When the collection happens, it happens" - Omar Gooding cc: Dialogue

The SCIF

42,309 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Gunnar Henderson is called out of the baseline on this play. A very gentlemanly thing to do, you could say.

Gunnar Henderson is called out of the baseline on this play. A very gentlemanly thing to do, you could say.

Jacob Calvin Meyer

57,241 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Martin Casado spent years dismissing the AI doom scenario and says what he got wrong was how long the scaling laws would keep holding: "I was responding to this Bostrom notion of recursive self-improvement, fast takeoff. You create one of these things, you step back, and it takes over the world... That's clearly not what's happening." "But here's what I got wrong. What I got wrong is I did not know that we could effectively just continue to pour money in this. The scaling laws are holding." "I don't know what it means to do a $100 billion training run, to have this thing that you're putting $100 billion in, and then that money comes from this meta-economic machinery that may want to solve whatever." "They may want to solve cancer, but they may also want to create a weapon. Like, who knows?" "This concentration of this many resources in a useful way, I think, is very new. I don't think we understand the implications. I think you could reasonably argue that that's very dangerous if you apply that $100 billion in the wrong way... What does it mean to be able to concentrate resources?" martin_casado

Martin Casado spent years dismissing the AI doom scenario and says what he got wrong was how long the scaling laws would keep holding: "I was responding to this Bostrom notion of recursive self-improvement, fast takeoff. You create one of these things, you step back, and it takes over the world... That's clearly not what's happening." "But here's what I got wrong. What I got wrong is I did not know that we could effectively just continue to pour money in this. The scaling laws are holding." "I don't know what it means to do a $100 billion training run, to have this thing that you're putting $100 billion in, and then that money comes from this meta-economic machinery that may want to solve whatever." "They may want to solve cancer, but they may also want to create a weapon. Like, who knows?" "This concentration of this many resources in a useful way, I think, is very new. I don't think we understand the implications. I think you could reasonably argue that that's very dangerous if you apply that $100 billion in the wrong way... What does it mean to be able to concentrate resources?" martin_casado

a16z

75,841 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

Q: Let's say you get this deal with the President of the United States. You're going to have to convince a lot of Canadians, skeptical of the trustworthiness of the President, that this time he means it. How will you explain that the President can be trusted when he signs a document with your name on it? Canada's Carney: First I have to be convinced, we have to be convinced, the team has to be convinced, the premiers have to be convinced that an agreement is worth the paper it's written on. We will know when we see it.

Q: Let's say you get this deal with the President of the United States. You're going to have to convince a lot of Canadians, skeptical of the trustworthiness of the President, that this time he means it. How will you explain that the President can be trusted when he signs a document with your name on it? Canada's Carney: First I have to be convinced, we have to be convinced, the team has to be convinced, the premiers have to be convinced that an agreement is worth the paper it's written on. We will know when we see it.

Clash Report

40,479 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Jordan Peterson: "If you're competent and silent you will be ignored." "You might think well people should reward you because you're competent. And yes of course they should. But if you're competent and silent then you're just part of the background that's keeping everything functioning" On why you cannot negotiate from a position of weakness: "If you want to push your career forward you have to push it forward. You have to be competent and you have to be strategic" "To be strategic when you negotiate for a new position or a new salary you have to be able to say if you don't give me what I want then something you don't like will happen to you" "It's not a physical threat. It's that you have an option" "You have your CV in order. You're educated and competent and desirable to people outside of your immediate job. You're willing to instantly put yourself on the job market" "So that when you go talk to the person you're negotiating with you're credible" On the one thing most people completely miss about negotiation: "It's very seldom that you're talking to the person who's at the top of the pecking order. What you need to do is tell them a story that they can tell to their boss to make you not a problem" "A good story is look we really need this person because they're hyper competent and they have a better offer" "If you go in there with no power you're going to lose. Obviously" He concludes with the one thing every competent person needs to hear: "The first thing you need to know if you're going to negotiate is that you have to be able to say no. And what no means is that you're not going to do it"

Jordan Peterson: "If you're competent and silent you will be ignored." "You might think well people should reward you because you're competent. And yes of course they should. But if you're competent and silent then you're just part of the background that's keeping everything functioning" On why you cannot negotiate from a position of weakness: "If you want to push your career forward you have to push it forward. You have to be competent and you have to be strategic" "To be strategic when you negotiate for a new position or a new salary you have to be able to say if you don't give me what I want then something you don't like will happen to you" "It's not a physical threat. It's that you have an option" "You have your CV in order. You're educated and competent and desirable to people outside of your immediate job. You're willing to instantly put yourself on the job market" "So that when you go talk to the person you're negotiating with you're credible" On the one thing most people completely miss about negotiation: "It's very seldom that you're talking to the person who's at the top of the pecking order. What you need to do is tell them a story that they can tell to their boss to make you not a problem" "A good story is look we really need this person because they're hyper competent and they have a better offer" "If you go in there with no power you're going to lose. Obviously" He concludes with the one thing every competent person needs to hear: "The first thing you need to know if you're going to negotiate is that you have to be able to say no. And what no means is that you're not going to do it"

Brad

34,992 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

A list? Seriously? After six months of Carney and 10 years of Liberals, you know what they need to do? It’s one thing: get out of the way. They know it. Industry knows it. Canadians know it.

A list? Seriously? After six months of Carney and 10 years of Liberals, you know what they need to do? It’s one thing: get out of the way. They know it. Industry knows it. Canadians know it.

Melissa Lantsman

140,539 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

“Everything is difficult. If you’re going to do something important it’s going to take you a decade or more to have an impact. You might as well pick something you care about. Pick the really big thing. It’s always bothered me when I talked to entrepreneurs and they tell me about the thing they're working on and I ask: What do you *really* want to do? And they say well the big thing I want to do is actually this [other idea] But in their mind it’s a little too ambitious, it’s a little too difficult, they need more capital…. You should just go for that now. You might as well work on the thing that will have a major impact if it works.”

“Everything is difficult. If you’re going to do something important it’s going to take you a decade or more to have an impact. You might as well pick something you care about. Pick the really big thing. It’s always bothered me when I talked to entrepreneurs and they tell me about the thing they're working on and I ask: What do you really want to do? And they say well the big thing I want to do is actually this [other idea] But in their mind it’s a little too ambitious, it’s a little too difficult, they need more capital…. You should just go for that now. You might as well work on the thing that will have a major impact if it works.”

David Senra

92,085 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This is absolutely sickening to listen to. We have professors literally repeating blood libel in the classrooms. The blood libel that led to pogroms, exiles, and the holocaust. This demonizing of Jews isn't even a little bit related to the conflict, and if you won't call it out because you think that it is, you are part of the problem. And, wouldn't you know it, this professor, Dr. Samar Maqusi, spent years working at UNRWA. What a surprise.

This is absolutely sickening to listen to. We have professors literally repeating blood libel in the classrooms. The blood libel that led to pogroms, exiles, and the holocaust. This demonizing of Jews isn't even a little bit related to the conflict, and if you won't call it out because you think that it is, you are part of the problem. And, wouldn't you know it, this professor, Dr. Samar Maqusi, spent years working at UNRWA. What a surprise.

Hen Mazzig

35,876 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Carney: This is a real referendum. It's not, you know, a question about a question, free option. It's a dangerous bluff. We're literally at 10 years anniversary of Brexit ... and you see what's happened in the United Kingdom. It's very reminiscent.

Carney: This is a real referendum. It's not, you know, a question about a question, free option. It's a dangerous bluff. We're literally at 10 years anniversary of Brexit ... and you see what's happened in the United Kingdom. It's very reminiscent.

Scott Robertson

112,521 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Naval Ravikant’s checklist for starting a company “The most important thing is there are no formulas. At the end of the day, you have to do what you love, and you have to do it even though people tell you it’ll never work. But that being said, if there was a formula [for starting a company], I would put it something like this.” Naval started seven companies before AngelList and this is the checklist he recommends running through before starting a startup: 1. Pick a great cofounder. This is most important: “You can do a company on your own, but it’s like you can raise a child on your own, but you probably shouldn’t. You need someone who’s going to be there with you.” This has it’s own checklist. Your cofounder should be: a. Very high intelligence (”hopefully they make you feel dumb, or they’re not smart enough”) b. Very high energy (”They should be extremely hardworking. A founder is someone who never has to be motivated. You should not have to be telling them to do their job.”) c. Very high integrity. (”a smart, hardworking crook who’s going to cheat you is the worst kind of person to be paired up with.”) 2. Pick a very large market. “Notice I don’t talk about the idea. I think ideas are almost irrelevant… The more important thing is that you pick a large space that you’re knowledgeable and passionate about. And then you will figure out what the right thing to do within that space is.” You want to be able to say to investors: “This is a space where there’s a huge market. I’m really knowledgeable and passionate about it. Here’s the great person that I have doing it with me. And here’s the minimum viable product that we have built. That will show that we can test in the marketplace… You iterate until you get to product/market fit… And then you go and you raise money from people you trust. And you use that money to scale.”

Naval Ravikant’s checklist for starting a company “The most important thing is there are no formulas. At the end of the day, you have to do what you love, and you have to do it even though people tell you it’ll never work. But that being said, if there was a formula [for starting a company], I would put it something like this.” Naval started seven companies before AngelList and this is the checklist he recommends running through before starting a startup: 1. Pick a great cofounder. This is most important: “You can do a company on your own, but it’s like you can raise a child on your own, but you probably shouldn’t. You need someone who’s going to be there with you.” This has it’s own checklist. Your cofounder should be: a. Very high intelligence (”hopefully they make you feel dumb, or they’re not smart enough”) b. Very high energy (”They should be extremely hardworking. A founder is someone who never has to be motivated. You should not have to be telling them to do their job.”) c. Very high integrity. (”a smart, hardworking crook who’s going to cheat you is the worst kind of person to be paired up with.”) 2. Pick a very large market. “Notice I don’t talk about the idea. I think ideas are almost irrelevant… The more important thing is that you pick a large space that you’re knowledgeable and passionate about. And then you will figure out what the right thing to do within that space is.” You want to be able to say to investors: “This is a space where there’s a huge market. I’m really knowledgeable and passionate about it. Here’s the great person that I have doing it with me. And here’s the minimum viable product that we have built. That will show that we can test in the marketplace… You iterate until you get to product/market fit… And then you go and you raise money from people you trust. And you use that money to scale.”

Startup Archive

36,050 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr