Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

CHD researchers just published a bombshell study exposing that infant mortality rates double after childhood vaccination. Then, it was REMOVED with no explanation. And the advisory board that removed it has ZERO safety expertise. Dr. Brian Hooker: "Retraction is a word that’s usually associated with peer-reviewed studies.” “But this...

ChildrensHD's profile picture

Children’s Health Defense

327,486 subscribers

24,374 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsHealth & WellnessScience & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🔥 Attorney EXPOSES pro-vaccine hypocrisy: “They ask for evidence—yet shut down every study exposing them” Rick Jaffe: "[Paul Thomas] tried to do these vax vs. unvax studies." "10 or 11 days after he published his study, his license was emergency suspended." "I had a draft of this complaint, and we had Brian and Karl’s article in there." "Then Angela told me the study had been… withdrawn." "Withdrawn sort of [only] comes from the author." "It wasn't withdrawn by them, it was withdrawn by the scientific advisory committee." "And they didn't even check the box, they didn't tell them why." "So the irony is this is… what happens to people that publish studies [about] vax vs. unvax." "I showed these guys the most recent study to prove the point, and then their study gets retracted.” "So then they found another Preprint." "My guess is in the next month it will be withdrawn for no reason also." "This is just further evidence of these tactics." "So they switch the questions and… force the withdrawal or the retraction of all these studies." Vaccine Safety Research Foundation richard jaffe Brian Hooker, PhD
2:16

🔥 Attorney EXPOSES pro-vaccine hypocrisy: “They ask for evidence—yet shut down every study exposing them” Rick Jaffe: "[Paul Thomas] tried to do these vax vs. unvax studies." "10 or 11 days after he published his study, his license was emergency suspended." "I had a draft of this complaint, and we had Brian and Karl’s article in there." "Then Angela told me the study had been… withdrawn." "Withdrawn sort of [only] comes from the author." "It wasn't withdrawn by them, it was withdrawn by the scientific advisory committee." "And they didn't even check the box, they didn't tell them why." "So the irony is this is… what happens to people that publish studies [about] vax vs. unvax." "I showed these guys the most recent study to prove the point, and then their study gets retracted.” "So then they found another Preprint." "My guess is in the next month it will be withdrawn for no reason also." "This is just further evidence of these tactics." "So they switch the questions and… force the withdrawal or the retraction of all these studies." Vaccine Safety Research Foundation richard jaffe Brian Hooker, PhD

Children’s Health Defense

22,675 views • 5 months ago

The ceremony ended with a powerful moment from Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, the newly appointed Director of the NIH. He called it “a historic day,” and warned that gain of function research—the kind that makes viruses more contagious or deadly—has always carried a catastrophic risk. “This research does not protect us against pandemics,” he said. “What it does is there's always a danger that in doing this research, it might leak out just by accident, even, and cause a pandemic.” Bhattacharya stressed that the vast majority of scientific research will continue as normal. But this small slice of high-risk experimentation? That’s no longer just up to scientists. “This executive order puts in place a framework to make sure that the public has a say… that in fact, the public can say, no, don’t take this risk.” For the first time, the door is finally closing on one of the most dangerous scientific practices in modern history.
1:27

The ceremony ended with a powerful moment from Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, the newly appointed Director of the NIH. He called it “a historic day,” and warned that gain of function research—the kind that makes viruses more contagious or deadly—has always carried a catastrophic risk. “This research does not protect us against pandemics,” he said. “What it does is there's always a danger that in doing this research, it might leak out just by accident, even, and cause a pandemic.” Bhattacharya stressed that the vast majority of scientific research will continue as normal. But this small slice of high-risk experimentation? That’s no longer just up to scientists. “This executive order puts in place a framework to make sure that the public has a say… that in fact, the public can say, no, don’t take this risk.” For the first time, the door is finally closing on one of the most dangerous scientific practices in modern history.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

271,483 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Dr. Brian Hooker speaks bluntly about the permanent damage of vaccination. “You cannot un-autism a kid.” “You cannot un-vaccinate your child.” “You just cannot.” “Once that vaccine is in, it’s going to do frank damage.” “And frankly, with the vaccine schedule today… no one gets a pass.” “There’s damage that is done to every single child, whether you know it, whether you recognize it or not.” The HighWire Brian Hooker, PhD
1:08

🚨 Dr. Brian Hooker speaks bluntly about the permanent damage of vaccination. “You cannot un-autism a kid.” “You cannot un-vaccinate your child.” “You just cannot.” “Once that vaccine is in, it’s going to do frank damage.” “And frankly, with the vaccine schedule today… no one gets a pass.” “There’s damage that is done to every single child, whether you know it, whether you recognize it or not.” The HighWire Brian Hooker, PhD

Children’s Health Defense

41,475 views • 4 months ago

There are no double-blind, placebo-based randomized controlled trials for the safety of childhood vaccines. They don't exist because the people responsible for them decided not to do them. I know this because in 2017 Robert F. Kennedy Jr and I sat down at the NIH with Francis Collins and Tony Fauci and asked them. We said, we can't find a single placebo-based safety trial for any vaccine on the childhood schedule. Are you doing them, or are we just not seeing them? They told us they don't do those trials because they believe it is unethical to withhold what they consider a beneficial product from a control group. That is the logic. The faith that the product is so valuable that studying it rigorously would be unfair to the people in the trial not getting it. So they never study it. Every vaccine given to every child in America rests on an assumption of safety and nothing more. Marcello Foa
2:32

There are no double-blind, placebo-based randomized controlled trials for the safety of childhood vaccines. They don't exist because the people responsible for them decided not to do them. I know this because in 2017 Robert F. Kennedy Jr and I sat down at the NIH with Francis Collins and Tony Fauci and asked them. We said, we can't find a single placebo-based safety trial for any vaccine on the childhood schedule. Are you doing them, or are we just not seeing them? They told us they don't do those trials because they believe it is unethical to withhold what they consider a beneficial product from a control group. That is the logic. The faith that the product is so valuable that studying it rigorously would be unfair to the people in the trial not getting it. So they never study it. Every vaccine given to every child in America rests on an assumption of safety and nothing more. Marcello Foa

Del Bigtree

116,842 views • 1 month ago

"The Largest Autopsy Series in the World" censored by powerful pharmaceutical interest: "we found that about 74% of the cases of sudden death were caused or contributed to by the vaccine" William Makis, working with Dr Peter McCullough and other Drs. was set to be published with the Lancet, but after hundreds of thousands of downloads, Big Pharma put pressure on the journal. Lancet "took the paper down", so they had to go to another publisher, which notified Makis MD hours before this clip was recorded, that it passed peer review. William Makis MD: "[We] submitted a vaccine injury paper to the Lancet, to one of the biggest journals in the world, co authored by Doctor Peter Mccullough myself, Doctor Mark Trozzi Doctor Roger Hodgkinson and other doctors that paper was [the] largest autopsy series in the world of covid vaccine people who took Covid 19 vaccines and then died suddenly a few days or a few weeks after." "That paper was downloaded hundreds of thousands of times and within 24 hours there was so much pressure put on by the pharmaceutical industry, that the Lancet took the paper down [and] basically wanted to cancel it forever" "I just found out a few hours ago that that paper has passed peer reviewed and is going to be published" It looks like the "peer review" process is shielding the pharmaceutical industry from liability
1:19

"The Largest Autopsy Series in the World" censored by powerful pharmaceutical interest: "we found that about 74% of the cases of sudden death were caused or contributed to by the vaccine" William Makis, working with Dr Peter McCullough and other Drs. was set to be published with the Lancet, but after hundreds of thousands of downloads, Big Pharma put pressure on the journal. Lancet "took the paper down", so they had to go to another publisher, which notified Makis MD hours before this clip was recorded, that it passed peer review. William Makis MD: "[We] submitted a vaccine injury paper to the Lancet, to one of the biggest journals in the world, co authored by Doctor Peter Mccullough myself, Doctor Mark Trozzi Doctor Roger Hodgkinson and other doctors that paper was [the] largest autopsy series in the world of covid vaccine people who took Covid 19 vaccines and then died suddenly a few days or a few weeks after." "That paper was downloaded hundreds of thousands of times and within 24 hours there was so much pressure put on by the pharmaceutical industry, that the Lancet took the paper down [and] basically wanted to cancel it forever" "I just found out a few hours ago that that paper has passed peer reviewed and is going to be published" It looks like the "peer review" process is shielding the pharmaceutical industry from liability

Humanspective

282,263 views • 1 year ago

Dr. Paul Thomas: "And there's no safe vaccine on the childhood schedule, period. So at this point, I'm also an anti-vaxxer because we don't have a safe vaccine. We don't even have a single one that was properly tested for safety." "However, if you aren't comfortable with how you want your child to die I say in the book in the book Vax Facts that you are more likely to die from the vaccine than you are from the disease for which there is a vaccine, and this is true for every single vaccine on the childhood schedule. It's still a death." "It's still super rare, but you're much more likely to die from the vaccine. So which do you want? You want a greater chance of dying from the vaccine or a lesser chance of dying from the disease? Of course, from many of these diseases, the risk is zero."
0:42

Dr. Paul Thomas: "And there's no safe vaccine on the childhood schedule, period. So at this point, I'm also an anti-vaxxer because we don't have a safe vaccine. We don't even have a single one that was properly tested for safety." "However, if you aren't comfortable with how you want your child to die I say in the book in the book Vax Facts that you are more likely to die from the vaccine than you are from the disease for which there is a vaccine, and this is true for every single vaccine on the childhood schedule. It's still a death." "It's still super rare, but you're much more likely to die from the vaccine. So which do you want? You want a greater chance of dying from the vaccine or a lesser chance of dying from the disease? Of course, from many of these diseases, the risk is zero."

Camus

69,827 views • 1 year ago

Bombshell Study Finds 74% of COVID Vaccine Autopsy Deaths Caused by Vaccine, Censored by Lancet A study published in The Lancet, based on 325 autopsies after COVID vaccination, found that 74% of deaths were caused by the vaccine. However, it was removed from the site within 24 hours. Authored by leading experts like cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough and Yale epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch, the paper awaited peer review. Despite the study's thorough methodology, a note on The Lancet stated that its conclusions were "not supported by the methodology." "From the preprints with the Lancet staff who removed the paper, it is hard to know what substance the claim that the conclusions are not supported by the method. So again, they're not telling you why they took it down," wrote The Daily Sceptic. "Keep in mind that the CDC has not yet acknowledged a single death being caused by COVID mRNA vaccines. Autopsy evidence demonstrating otherwise is clearly not what the United States public health establishment wants to hear."
5:08

Bombshell Study Finds 74% of COVID Vaccine Autopsy Deaths Caused by Vaccine, Censored by Lancet A study published in The Lancet, based on 325 autopsies after COVID vaccination, found that 74% of deaths were caused by the vaccine. However, it was removed from the site within 24 hours. Authored by leading experts like cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough and Yale epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch, the paper awaited peer review. Despite the study's thorough methodology, a note on The Lancet stated that its conclusions were "not supported by the methodology." "From the preprints with the Lancet staff who removed the paper, it is hard to know what substance the claim that the conclusions are not supported by the method. So again, they're not telling you why they took it down," wrote The Daily Sceptic. "Keep in mind that the CDC has not yet acknowledged a single death being caused by COVID mRNA vaccines. Autopsy evidence demonstrating otherwise is clearly not what the United States public health establishment wants to hear."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,586,365 views • 2 years ago

A leaked discussion reveals the fundamental breach of trust at the heart of vaccine policy. The central question from the public has always been: "Is it safe?" But behind closed doors, as highlighted by Del Bigtree, the conversation wasn't about ensuring safety. It was about managing a public relations problem. They admitted several critical things: First, they confessed that their primary goal is not to ensure safety, but to "maximize" it. This is a profound distinction. It means a baseline level of risk is not just acknowledged, but is an accepted part of the equation. Second, they revealed their true obsession: "We can't have any decision that reduces people vaccinating." Their entire focus was on maintaining public participation, not on an impartial scientific inquiry into the safety signals being raised. Third, they explicitly stated their dilemma: if they honestly discussed risks or validated any concerns, people might make different choices, like opting for single-dose vaccines. This, they feared, would mean "we've got a dragon by the tail." So, what was their solution? Their stated mission became not to find the scientific truth, but to find a "consistent story" and "communication mechanisms" to avoid scaring the public. The charge of the panel was to "work our way out of the trap." This is the smoking gun. It shows that the conclusion "vaccines don't cause autism" was not simply a result of pure science, but the necessary endpoint of a managed communication strategy designed to protect vaccination rates at all costs. The public asks for safety assurances and is given PR talking points. The demand for transparent risk-benefit analysis is met with a campaign to eliminate doubt. This is why trust has been shattered.
3:16

A leaked discussion reveals the fundamental breach of trust at the heart of vaccine policy. The central question from the public has always been: "Is it safe?" But behind closed doors, as highlighted by Del Bigtree, the conversation wasn't about ensuring safety. It was about managing a public relations problem. They admitted several critical things: First, they confessed that their primary goal is not to ensure safety, but to "maximize" it. This is a profound distinction. It means a baseline level of risk is not just acknowledged, but is an accepted part of the equation. Second, they revealed their true obsession: "We can't have any decision that reduces people vaccinating." Their entire focus was on maintaining public participation, not on an impartial scientific inquiry into the safety signals being raised. Third, they explicitly stated their dilemma: if they honestly discussed risks or validated any concerns, people might make different choices, like opting for single-dose vaccines. This, they feared, would mean "we've got a dragon by the tail." So, what was their solution? Their stated mission became not to find the scientific truth, but to find a "consistent story" and "communication mechanisms" to avoid scaring the public. The charge of the panel was to "work our way out of the trap." This is the smoking gun. It shows that the conclusion "vaccines don't cause autism" was not simply a result of pure science, but the necessary endpoint of a managed communication strategy designed to protect vaccination rates at all costs. The public asks for safety assurances and is given PR talking points. The demand for transparent risk-benefit analysis is met with a campaign to eliminate doubt. This is why trust has been shattered.

Camus

20,109 views • 9 months ago

Dr. Brian Hooker says AstraZeneca’s Covid vaccine was known to be deadly long before it was pulled. “We’re trying to get a paper published right now that shows that the death rate of the AstraZeneca was much higher than the death rate of the Pfizer.” “Not saying that either one of them is good, but the thing that’s really frightening is they pulled the AstraZeneca off the market in 2024, but they knew about this effect in 2022.”
0:44

Dr. Brian Hooker says AstraZeneca’s Covid vaccine was known to be deadly long before it was pulled. “We’re trying to get a paper published right now that shows that the death rate of the AstraZeneca was much higher than the death rate of the Pfizer.” “Not saying that either one of them is good, but the thing that’s really frightening is they pulled the AstraZeneca off the market in 2024, but they knew about this effect in 2022.”

Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP

28,032 views • 6 months ago

Moderna Wants to Replace the Entire Childhood Vaccine Schedule With mRNA Vaccines. That Is Their Stated Goal. The pause on mRNA funding was not a stop. The companies are still running full research portfolios. Moderna has made it explicit: they want every vaccine on the childhood schedule reformulated in mRNA. Every single one. For every child. With a technology that has never had long-term safety data, that skipped oncogenic preclinical studies, and that has already been linked to myocarditis, turbo cancer, and immune dysregulation. This is not hypothetical. It is their published roadmap. Join the Fight: Courtesy of Redacted Redacted Clayton Morris Watch the Full Episode: #MedicalFreedom
0:45

Moderna Wants to Replace the Entire Childhood Vaccine Schedule With mRNA Vaccines. That Is Their Stated Goal. The pause on mRNA funding was not a stop. The companies are still running full research portfolios. Moderna has made it explicit: they want every vaccine on the childhood schedule reformulated in mRNA. Every single one. For every child. With a technology that has never had long-term safety data, that skipped oncogenic preclinical studies, and that has already been linked to myocarditis, turbo cancer, and immune dysregulation. This is not hypothetical. It is their published roadmap. Join the Fight: Courtesy of Redacted Redacted Clayton Morris Watch the Full Episode: #MedicalFreedom

McCullough Foundation

47,179 views • 1 month ago

🚨 BREAKING: A new study that exposed a higher mortality rate in vaccinated infants than unvaccinated infants was just retracted with NO explanation. This study was groundbreaking. And it was censored less than a month after being published. Dr. Karl Jablonowski just broke down the shocking censorship of this paper he co-wrote with Dr. Brian Hooker: “Our paper went live at the end of December, and it had an amazingly large reception with a lot of people accessing it, and it going viral on social media.” “A few days ago, we received correspondence from Preprints dot org saying that they are going to retract the paper with no explanation.” “In this paper, we demonstrate from the State of Louisiana data that children who were vaccinated in their second month of life were more likely to d*e in their third month of life.” “And that was statistically significant.” “It was worse for Black children than for white children, and it was much worse for females than it was for males.”
2:38

🚨 BREAKING: A new study that exposed a higher mortality rate in vaccinated infants than unvaccinated infants was just retracted with NO explanation. This study was groundbreaking. And it was censored less than a month after being published. Dr. Karl Jablonowski just broke down the shocking censorship of this paper he co-wrote with Dr. Brian Hooker: “Our paper went live at the end of December, and it had an amazingly large reception with a lot of people accessing it, and it going viral on social media.” “A few days ago, we received correspondence from Preprints dot org saying that they are going to retract the paper with no explanation.” “In this paper, we demonstrate from the State of Louisiana data that children who were vaccinated in their second month of life were more likely to d*e in their third month of life.” “And that was statistically significant.” “It was worse for Black children than for white children, and it was much worse for females than it was for males.”

Children’s Health Defense

392,644 views • 5 months ago

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - Bombshell autopsy study proves COVID vaccines are causing large numbers of deaths. Powerful interests CENSORED this study TWICE, but now it has been peer-reviewed and published for the world to read. Here's what the study found: • 73.9% of the deaths (240 of 325) were DIRECTLY linked to vaccination, with physicians confirming the vaccine as a direct or significant contributor to death. • Of the COVID vaccine-related deaths, sudden cardiac arrest (died suddenly) was the leading cause of death (35% of cases). • COVID vaccine-related deaths occurred rapidly, averaging 14.3 days post-vaccination, with the majority occurring within a week. • The study has officially been republished after passing peer review in the journal Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law. • The study indicates the COVID jabs “must undergo an immediate Class I recall by the FDA to protect public safety.” “I have now published the largest autopsy study ever in that circumstance where someone dies [suddenly after the vaccine], and they undergo an autopsy. And the answer is 73.9% of the time, it's directly due to the vaccine if they've taken it,” reported Dr. Peter McCullough. “The next athlete who has a cardiac arrest, the next actor or actress that has a stroke, or the next loved one that suddenly develops a heart attack or a cardiac problem out of the blue, it is likely due to the vaccine.” Follow Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, and McCullough Foundation for more details on this study and breaking news about the COVID-19 injections. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)
1:26

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - Bombshell autopsy study proves COVID vaccines are causing large numbers of deaths. Powerful interests CENSORED this study TWICE, but now it has been peer-reviewed and published for the world to read. Here's what the study found: • 73.9% of the deaths (240 of 325) were DIRECTLY linked to vaccination, with physicians confirming the vaccine as a direct or significant contributor to death. • Of the COVID vaccine-related deaths, sudden cardiac arrest (died suddenly) was the leading cause of death (35% of cases). • COVID vaccine-related deaths occurred rapidly, averaging 14.3 days post-vaccination, with the majority occurring within a week. • The study has officially been republished after passing peer review in the journal Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law. • The study indicates the COVID jabs “must undergo an immediate Class I recall by the FDA to protect public safety.” “I have now published the largest autopsy study ever in that circumstance where someone dies [suddenly after the vaccine], and they undergo an autopsy. And the answer is 73.9% of the time, it's directly due to the vaccine if they've taken it,” reported Dr. Peter McCullough. “The next athlete who has a cardiac arrest, the next actor or actress that has a stroke, or the next loved one that suddenly develops a heart attack or a cardiac problem out of the blue, it is likely due to the vaccine.” Follow Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®, Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, and McCullough Foundation for more details on this study and breaking news about the COVID-19 injections. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,147,735 views • 1 year ago

Dr. Andy Wakefield shares with Alex Jones that a previous head of the FDA openly stated that information questioning vaccine safety cannot be allowed to circulate. “Let me read you this… this is a government document by the head of the FDA in the Federal Register.” “‘Any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation’s public health objectives.’” “In other words, it doesn’t matter how good the science is questioning vaccine safety.” “It doesn’t matter how many children are injured or how seriously they’re injured.” “It cannot be allowed to exist because it’s not consistent with the government’s vaccine objectives.” Dr. Andy Wakefield Alex Jones
1:16

Dr. Andy Wakefield shares with Alex Jones that a previous head of the FDA openly stated that information questioning vaccine safety cannot be allowed to circulate. “Let me read you this… this is a government document by the head of the FDA in the Federal Register.” “‘Any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation’s public health objectives.’” “In other words, it doesn’t matter how good the science is questioning vaccine safety.” “It doesn’t matter how many children are injured or how seriously they’re injured.” “It cannot be allowed to exist because it’s not consistent with the government’s vaccine objectives.” Dr. Andy Wakefield Alex Jones

Children’s Health Defense

41,473 views • 6 months ago

This past Thursday, Brian Hooker, PhD described getting the results back from his son's hair-metal test. Holding that paper from the doctor's office, and crumpling down on the bathroom floor and sobbing. Because you cannot unvaccinate your child. Once that vaccine is in, it's in. And with the vaccine policy the way it has been, no one gets a pass. There is damage done to every single child, whether you recognize it or not. That's not easy to say or easy to hear. Dr. Hooker says that if we can prevent even one family from living through what so many families already have, that's a good day. That's why this fight never stops.
0:57

This past Thursday, Brian Hooker, PhD described getting the results back from his son's hair-metal test. Holding that paper from the doctor's office, and crumpling down on the bathroom floor and sobbing. Because you cannot unvaccinate your child. Once that vaccine is in, it's in. And with the vaccine policy the way it has been, no one gets a pass. There is damage done to every single child, whether you recognize it or not. That's not easy to say or easy to hear. Dr. Hooker says that if we can prevent even one family from living through what so many families already have, that's a good day. That's why this fight never stops.

The HighWire

23,152 views • 4 months ago

Elon Musk just told you why caution kills more companies than risk ever has. Musk: “One of the approaches we did take was to proceed at risk with temporary permits.” Hundreds of millions in concrete before the final signature exists. Knowing the full downside. Musk: “Your long-term permit could be denied, in which case you have to stop everything.” Tear it all down. Back to dirt. Every board on Earth calls that unacceptable. Musk calls it cheaper than the alternative. Musk: “Most companies are not willing to take the risk of the temporary permit, and then the risk of having to stop and tear down.” They think they are avoiding risk. They are selecting one. Waiting is not neutral. Waiting is a position. A bet that the market holds, the team stays, and momentum outlasts a system designed to outlast you. It never does. No one says no. The calendar says it for them. Not rejection. Erosion. Musk saw it for what it was. He chose the risk you can see over the risk you cannot. Gigafactories rose in months while the rest of the industry waited on the meeting about the permit. The gap was never resources. It was the willingness to see that waiting is not free. It is the most expensive decision in business. Because it is the only one nobody knows they are making.
0:35

Elon Musk just told you why caution kills more companies than risk ever has. Musk: “One of the approaches we did take was to proceed at risk with temporary permits.” Hundreds of millions in concrete before the final signature exists. Knowing the full downside. Musk: “Your long-term permit could be denied, in which case you have to stop everything.” Tear it all down. Back to dirt. Every board on Earth calls that unacceptable. Musk calls it cheaper than the alternative. Musk: “Most companies are not willing to take the risk of the temporary permit, and then the risk of having to stop and tear down.” They think they are avoiding risk. They are selecting one. Waiting is not neutral. Waiting is a position. A bet that the market holds, the team stays, and momentum outlasts a system designed to outlast you. It never does. No one says no. The calendar says it for them. Not rejection. Erosion. Musk saw it for what it was. He chose the risk you can see over the risk you cannot. Gigafactories rose in months while the rest of the industry waited on the meeting about the permit. The gap was never resources. It was the willingness to see that waiting is not free. It is the most expensive decision in business. Because it is the only one nobody knows they are making.

Dustin

18,985 views • 23 days ago

Dr. Paul Thomas: For every childhood vaccine, risk of death from vaccine far exceeds risk of death from disease Pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas unveils shocking data that flips the vaccine narrative upside down. After diving into the numbers, he found a truth that’s hard to swallow: Unequivocally, for every single vaccine on the childhood schedule, the risk of death from the vaccine is far greater than the risk of dying from the disease it targets. Yes, across the board, vaccines pose a deadlier threat than the illnesses they’re meant to prevent. Parents dread losing their child to a preventable disease, but Dr. Thomas challenges: Why vaccinate when the data shows the cure is riskier than the disease? “If you’re afraid of your child dying, do not give them a vaccine. Period,” he states boldly. The evidence is clear. Beyond mortality, Dr. Thomas sounds the alarm on soaring severe autism rates, leaving countless children needing lifelong care and families grappling with immense challenges. Why are we turning a blind eye to this crisis? This isn’t about scaring parents—it’s about empowering them with data. Dr. Thomas calls for families to question the standard vaccine schedule and seek the truth for themselves. The numbers demand a reckoning.
0:46

Dr. Paul Thomas: For every childhood vaccine, risk of death from vaccine far exceeds risk of death from disease Pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas unveils shocking data that flips the vaccine narrative upside down. After diving into the numbers, he found a truth that’s hard to swallow: Unequivocally, for every single vaccine on the childhood schedule, the risk of death from the vaccine is far greater than the risk of dying from the disease it targets. Yes, across the board, vaccines pose a deadlier threat than the illnesses they’re meant to prevent. Parents dread losing their child to a preventable disease, but Dr. Thomas challenges: Why vaccinate when the data shows the cure is riskier than the disease? “If you’re afraid of your child dying, do not give them a vaccine. Period,” he states boldly. The evidence is clear. Beyond mortality, Dr. Thomas sounds the alarm on soaring severe autism rates, leaving countless children needing lifelong care and families grappling with immense challenges. Why are we turning a blind eye to this crisis? This isn’t about scaring parents—it’s about empowering them with data. Dr. Thomas calls for families to question the standard vaccine schedule and seek the truth for themselves. The numbers demand a reckoning.

Camus

12,953 views • 1 year ago

Dr. Brian Hooker just slammed the CDC for sitting on data exposing the truth about the autism epidemic—and doing nothing. “They do not want to implicate any vaccine or vaccine component in causing autism.” But his team has done the study. Here’s what they found: “This is a multifactorial disorder that implicates the complex sort of toxic soup that we live in today.” “What we are looking at is [vaccine components that] screw up mitochondria and then cause autism.” “One series of publications that put all of that together doesn't exist.” “They’ve had the data, they've had the information.” “What we did was we took the information that shows the pieces of the puzzle, and we link that information together.” “In addition to that, we talk about what it would take for a single publication to do that.” “So I'm really proud of this paper.” “I don't think you can conclude that it's one thing and only one thing.” “You look at what causes the oxidative stress and what causes the damage that happens in the brain there.” “It's multifactorial.” “In some instances, it's many factors that come into play together.” “In other instances, it can be overwhelmingly a single factor or just a small number of factors.” Brian Hooker, PhD Robert Scott Bell
3:04

Dr. Brian Hooker just slammed the CDC for sitting on data exposing the truth about the autism epidemic—and doing nothing. “They do not want to implicate any vaccine or vaccine component in causing autism.” But his team has done the study. Here’s what they found: “This is a multifactorial disorder that implicates the complex sort of toxic soup that we live in today.” “What we are looking at is [vaccine components that] screw up mitochondria and then cause autism.” “One series of publications that put all of that together doesn't exist.” “They’ve had the data, they've had the information.” “What we did was we took the information that shows the pieces of the puzzle, and we link that information together.” “In addition to that, we talk about what it would take for a single publication to do that.” “So I'm really proud of this paper.” “I don't think you can conclude that it's one thing and only one thing.” “You look at what causes the oxidative stress and what causes the damage that happens in the brain there.” “It's multifactorial.” “In some instances, it's many factors that come into play together.” “In other instances, it can be overwhelmingly a single factor or just a small number of factors.” Brian Hooker, PhD Robert Scott Bell

Children’s Health Defense

23,496 views • 2 months ago