Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Check out this miniature comedian! Just as young children develop over time, so too does the sophistication of their humor. Infants take particular delight in visual/physical forms of humor (silly faces, misuse of objects), for example. But by two and three years of age, children’s humor becomes increasingly language-based...

348,293 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙‍♀️🦉🐈‍⬛ 🦖
Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙‍♀️🦉🐈‍⬛ 🦖vor 3 Jahren

When I was little I held one of those plastic rain bonnets in my hand. The kind that fold up and you can put over your hair. I “snapped” it shut and looked over and my baby sister who was in her crib at the time burst out laughing. My mother and I looked over stunned. Mom said “do it again!” I did and she laughed! I don’t mean baby giggles. I mean an actual laugh. From a little baby. We did it over and over and over. We were all laughing!

Profilbild von Gráinne Treanor
Gráinne Treanorvor 3 Jahren

From a 3-year-old in the back of the car: What does ‘mean’ mean? [he laughed a lot] Me: ‘Mean’ means ‘mean’ [he laughed more and asked the same question several times, laughing each time at the answer]

Profilbild von Helen (she / her) 🖤💛❤️ Always Was Always Will Be
Helen (she / her) 🖤💛❤️ Always Was Always Will Bevor 3 Jahren

& Motthew is a really good name for a pet moth ❤️

Profilbild von MomShieb
MomShiebvor 3 Jahren

When my first child was 2, I was getting her ready to go out. I said, "OK, time to boogie." And she blew her nose on me. Then she burst out laughing and said, "Boogie!" Good one, huh?

Profilbild von Sarah Ziman/BardyMum - 'Brain' out now!
Sarah Ziman/BardyMum - 'Brain' out now!vor 3 Jahren

He’s adorable! And I love his punning, boy after my own heart. I remember trying on a red coat when out shopping with my son when he was around 2 (early talker) and he said ‘oh you’re all red Mummy…like a book’.

Profilbild von CFOLS
CFOLSvor 3 Jahren

Reminds me of my kid. He was abt 2 yo & we were in the ER. I gave him my I-pod to keep him entertained (it was a very long wait). He dropped it and started referring to it as the I-drop

Profilbild von Christine Heaphy
Christine Heaphyvor 3 Jahren

Love the belly laugh! My toddler son named his hermit crab “Shellvis.” As in Shell + Elvis! We always loved that name, and he thought he was quite clever, too’

Profilbild von Megan Mogan
Megan Moganvor 3 Jahren

Our preschooler was playing with a toy boat, acting out a dialogue among passengers and I overheard, “Don’t be afraid. You’re on a relationSHIP.”

Profilbild von Mel C
Mel Cvor 3 Jahren

My grandkids are 2 and 4, both boys, and we have a lot of these! They largely involve creative language and puns about rear-ends and what happens there, so I’ll spare you 😜

Profilbild von Peacock Queen
Peacock Queenvor 3 Jahren

His mother wasn’t to thrilled…….but a Titi’s job is to teach fun. Lol

Ähnliche Videos

From 0 to 60 in X seconds… For years that’s been one of the benchmarks used by auto manufacturers to describe the rapid acceleration of the world’s most powerful cars. It’s also a perfect metaphor to wrap up two weeks of posts focused on the language acquisition of young children. Babies enter the world with cries and gurgles… advance rapidly to complex forms of babbling, and generally speak their first words within a year. Their vocabularies growing exponentially, they begin stringing simple sentences together shortly thereafter and by two years of age, become surprisingly powerful little communicators. From 0 to 60 in just a little more than 24 months. It’s really amazing to witness. I began this series with video of a baby’s first sounds, captured in a hospital maternity ward. So what better way to conclude it than with an example of the end result? I got such a kick out of listening to this little one, age two, discussing her exasperation over the family dog’s need to bark at… well, everything. Check out not only her complex vocabulary and grammar, but her expression and tone… The way her personality is exposed through her vocalizations. Listening to her it’s hard to imagine that roughly 18 months prior she’d not yet spoken a single conventional word. Talk about acceleration! 🏎️ Of course this isn’t truly the end point for language development. Her vocabulary will continue to grow throughout her lifetime, for example… but the foundations of her lifelong success have been laid… transforming not only her ability to communicate but the very ways she is able to think. Language is arguably humankind’s most powerful tool. And it’s mastered rapidly by its most efficient and precocious little learners. This fantastic video was shared to IG by harperraeels.

Dan Wuori

101,413 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Here is the real voice of Einstein. In 1941, the great physicist was recorded reading an essay he wrote called "The Common Language of Science." In this fascinating excerpt, he warns of the dangers of "errors and deception" that come from letting your language (and ideas) drift away from the reality perceived by your senses. Good message for all times — especially ours. The Common Language of Science The first step towards language was to link acoustically or otherwise commutable signs to sense-impressions. Most likely all sociable animals have arrived at this primitive kind of communication--at least to a certain degree. A higher development is reached when further signs are introduced and understood which establish relations between those other signs designating sense impression. At this stage it is already possible to report somewhat complex series of impressions; we can say that language has come to existence. If language is to lead at all to understanding, there must be rules concerning the relations between the signs on the one hand and on the other hand there must be a stable correspondence between signs and impressions. In their childhood individuals connected by the same language grasp these rules and relations mainly by intuition. When man becomes conscious of the rules concerning the relations between signs the so-called grammar of language is established. In an early stage the words may correspond directly to impressions. At a later stage this direct connection is lost insofar as some words convey relations to perceptions only if used in connection with other words (for instance such words as: "is", "or", "thing"). Then word-groups rather than single words refer to perceptions. When language becomes thus partially independent from the background of impressions a greater inner coherence is gained. Only at this further development where frequent use is made of so-called abstract concepts, language becomes an instrument of reasoning in the true sense of the word. But it is also this development which turns language into a dangerous source of error and deception. Everything depends on the degree to which words and word combinations correspond to the world of impression. What is it that brings about such an intimate connection between language and thinking? Is there no thinking without the use of language, namely in concepts and concept-combinations for which words need not necessarily come to mind? Has not every one of us struggled for words although the connection between "things" was already clear? We might be inclined to attribute to the act of thinking complete independence from language if the individual formed or were able to form his concepts without the verbal guidance of his environment. Yet most likely the mental shape of an individual growing up under such conditions, would be very poor. Thus we may conclude that the mental development of the individual and his way of forming concepts depend to a high degree upon language. This makes us realize to what extent the same language means the same mentality. In this sense thinking and language are linked together.

Benjamin Carlson

14,905 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Now here’s a little guy who LOVES his pacifier. This is a topic I’ve avoided to date, largely because there are so many varying opinions on the matter. For me the question isn’t so much whether to use one, but for how long. Infants are born with a strong sucking reflex and pacifiers can help them to soothe and sleep. There’s even some evidence to suggest that sleeping with pacifiers might reduce the risk of SIDS. In short: for babies (up to a year), I’m a fan. But it’s not uncommon to see children with pacifiers well into toddlerhood, and in some cases, even beyond. And here I’d raise some cautions. Children who rely heavily on pacifiers may be more prone to middle ear infections. And dentists note that prolonged pacifier use can affect your child’s teeth and create bite issues. Perhaps most importantly is their potential to impact expressive language development. Your child’s ability to speak is an important one. After a point, language shapes not only the content of our thinking, but the very structure of our cognition. By otherwise occupying the mouth over long periods of time, pacifiers may slow language development by limiting opportunities for expression. Speaking with a pacifier in the mouth can also lead to distortion of speech sounds (even when they aren’t in the mouth). All told, I’m an advocate for beginning to wean off of pacifiers at around one year of age. The transition can be difficult - but not nearly as challenging as for a child who has become dependent over a period of years. Do/did you use pacifiers with your child? Why or why not? How did you help transition away from their use? This sweet little one (for whom a pacifier is still completely age appropriate) was shared to IG by voroujakeman.

Dan Wuori

335,923 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

How does language begin? There’s a lot of important growth and development that occurs during the 45 month window from prenatal to age three. But among infancy’s greatest accomplishments is language acquisition. So over the coming week I’m going to dedicate this space to a series of posts on the sequential growth of language, which you may be surprised to learn begins even before birth. As your baby’s hearing activates between 18-20 weeks of gestation, they begin hearing their first sounds: Mom’s heartbeat, digestive rumblings, and voice. As you might imagine, sound isn’t crystal clear in the amniotic sac. (It’s not a perfect comparison, but consider how your own hearing changes under water in a swimming pool. You can still hear, but the sounds are muffled and significantly degraded.) For this and other reasons, your baby isn’t absorbing specific vocabulary at this point, but there’s little question that they are beginning to familiarize themselves with not only the tones/sound of their mother’s voice, but the distinct rhythms and patterns of her native language. We’re still only beginning to understand prenatal learning, but research demonstrates that in the minutes and hours immediately after birth, newborns already recognize their mother’s voice and can distinguish (and prefer) their own native language. That’s right: at birth babies’ brains have already begun organizing themselves around their mothers’ native languages. Pretty remarkable, no? It’s the first step in a miraculous process by which young children acquire complex linguistic ability over a period of just months. As for this precious little one, just minutes old, watch how he calms from a cry to an instant silence when exposed to the clear and familiar sound of his mother’s voice. Tomorrow we’ll look at the earliest forms of vocalization. This beautiful video was shared to YT by @lashaviouskirk9862.

Dan Wuori

122,020 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren