Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

China’s high speed trains travel at around 350 km/h while passengers work, have coffee or sleep as if they were on a regular commute. The scale behind that experience is remarkable. China’s high speed rail network now extends beyond 50,000 km, supported by an immense system of tracks, bridges,...

212,563 просмотров • 5 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 6

Фото профиля Twiter User
Twiter User4 дней назад

@rishibagree @amitmalviya Mari is now chinese agent?

Фото профиля Lisa Wright
Lisa Wright4 дней назад

Impressive no doubt, but who pays for 50,000 km of rail? The debt-trap side never shows up in the passenger experience! We would rather build slower with transparency than celebrate numbers we can't question.

Фото профиля Ashok Daga
Ashok Daga5 дней назад

We hv guaranteed 6/16 km per hr actual speed but call 160 km/hr capacity @RailMinIndia runs train without fail late no GST bill by @IRCTCofficial vendor grt jumlabaaz

Фото профиля @instagram = @aravindrajeshnagarajan
@instagram = @aravindrajeshnagarajan4 дней назад

The snow portion appears unsettling to me.if this is true there must be sensors that monitor the snow accumulation and calculate whether the combined speed of the train would be able to plough through the accumulated snow on the tracks. Did Japanese help in technology collaboration for high speed rail?

Фото профиля Anurag Tiwari
Anurag Tiwari4 дней назад

Eh !!! Big deal ! Our achievement's no less ! Ask them to come down to India.. we'll show them Moon crater's on our roads !😂😂😂

Фото профиля Bhavesh Shah
Bhavesh Shah4 дней назад

I’ve experienced this in China. The speed, comfort and technology of their high-speed trains are truly amazing!

Похожие видео

Japan’s bullet trains had a problem big enough to threaten the future of high-speed rail. At 200 mph, tunnels turned them into sonic bombs. Noise complaints grew. Communities suffered. Speed restrictions became a real risk. What stands out to me is this: The solution did not come from more force. It came from a bird. Engineer Eiji Nakatsu studied the kingfisher, which moves from air into water with barely a splash, and used that insight to redesign the Shinkansen’s nose. The result was remarkable: ↳ sonic boom dramatically reduced ↳ trains became about 10% faster ↳ electricity use dropped by around 15% But this was never just about noise. This is the deeper impact: ↳ 15% less energy has been framed as 200,000 fewer tons of CO2 annually ↳ 10% faster speeds can mean more people living outside expensive cities while still commuting ↳ quieter tunnels can mean families near the tracks finally sleeping through the night That is what makes this story bigger than engineering. One bird’s beak did not just improve a train. It reshaped how an entire system could perform, with less friction for people and the environment. I see a much bigger lesson here. The best innovation does not always come from adding more power, more cost, or more complexity. Sometimes it comes from observing better. Nature has already solved for speed, efficiency, resilience, and adaptation. The real question is whether we are humble enough to learn from it. Because the future will not belong only to those who build more powerful systems. It will belong to those who build systems that work better with reality. What system in your industry is still being forced forward when it should be fundamentally redesigned? #Innovation #Biomimicry #Engineering #Leadership #Technology #Transportation #Sustainability #AI #FutureOfWork #PascalBornet

Pascal Bornet

54,782 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🇨🇳 CHINA'S MAGLEV HITS 700 KM/H IN 2 SECONDS - PLANNING 1,000 KM/H - WHILE AMERICA ARGUES ABOUT FIXING POTHOLES China just tested a maglev platform that accelerates to 700 km/h (435 mph) in 2 seconds. Target speed: 1,000 km/h (621 mph). That's faster than commercial aircraft. On the ground. The acceleration alone is borderline violent - 0 to 435 mph in two seconds is 9.8g. Fighter jet territory. Passengers would need specialized seating just to survive the launch. But let's address reality: This is a test platform. Prototype speeds don't mean operational trains. China announces ambitious projects constantly. Some materialize (their existing 430 km/h maglev in Shanghai works). Others disappear quietly. The pattern though? They're attempting scale nobody else is. High-speed rail connecting every major city. Maglev research pushed to extremes. Infrastructure spending that makes Western investment look microscopic. Meanwhile in America: Amtrak averages 105 km/h between cities. California's high-speed rail project started in 2008, burned $10+ billion, and hasn't moved a passenger. The fastest train in the U.S. hits 240 km/h for exactly one 54-mile stretch. China's going for 1,000 km/h. Even if they only achieve 800 km/h operationally, that's still triple America's maximum. Here's why this matters beyond trains: Infrastructure capacity signals industrial capability. If China can build and operate 1,000 km/h trains, they can manufacture the precision components, power systems, and control mechanisms that transfer to aerospace, military, and manufacturing. The U.S. won the 20th century partly because it built the Interstate Highway System when others couldn't. China's betting the 21st century winner will be whoever builds impossible infrastructure first. They might fail. Engineering challenges at 1,000 km/h are extreme - air resistance, track precision, emergency braking, passenger safety. But they're trying while America argues whether to fix the L train in New York. Even Chinese failure puts them ahead. You learn more from attempting the impossible than from successfully maintaining mediocrity. Source: Xinhua, CGTN

Mario Nawfal

818,316 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Why Does Indonesia Have a 350 km/h Fast Train While Australia Still Struggles With Average-Speed Rail? By Jamie McIntyre, Political Commentator, Australian National Review One of the biggest surprises of my recent visit to Indonesia wasn’t the new capital city of Nusantara or Jakarta’s relentless pace. It was boarding the Whoosh high-speed train between Jakarta and Bandung. The experience was extraordinary. In just around 30 minutes, we travelled between two major cities at speeds reaching approximately 350 km/h. The journey was smooth, quiet and every bit as impressive as the high-speed rail systems I’ve experienced elsewhere in Asia. What struck me wasn’t simply Indonesia’s achievement. It was Australia’s failure. Indonesia is still commonly described as a developing nation, yet it has managed to build one of Southeast Asia’s most advanced transport systems while Australia, one of the wealthiest countries in the world on a per capita basis, still cannot deliver even ordinary passenger rail between many of its major population centres. Perhaps before politicians start talking about futuristic high-speed rail, Australia should first learn how to build an average-speed train. Take the Brisbane to Gold Coast corridor. The two cities are only around 70 kilometres apart. An ordinary modern passenger train travelling at about 120 km/h could complete much of that journey in around 30 to 40 minutes, transforming daily commuting for hundreds of thousands of people. Instead, commuters often spend 70 to 90 minutes on today’s rail services, and considerably longer if travelling by car during peak-hour gridlock. That isn’t simply inconvenient. It is an enormous drag on productivity, quality of life and economic growth. Every extra hour spent sitting in traffic is an hour not spent with family, running a business or contributing to the economy. Meanwhile, Indonesia has leapfrogged into the future. The country’s Whoosh high-speed railway demonstrates what can be achieved when governments decide that modern infrastructure is an investment rather than merely another political announcement. Australia has spent decades discussing high-speed rail. We’ve commissioned study after study, produced glossy reports and made election promises. Yet little changes. Australians deserve to ask an uncomfortable question. How can Indonesia build a 350 km/h railway while Australia still struggles to provide reliable, average-speed rail between nearby cities? Infrastructure should not be viewed through a political lens. It should be viewed through an economic one. -Faster transport means higher productivity. -It expands labour markets. -It reduces congestion. -It increases property values around transport hubs. -It attracts investment. -It improves tourism. Most importantly, it gives people back something increasingly valuable: time. Australia has the engineering expertise. It has the financial capacity. What appears to be missing is the political will. Watching Indonesia’s sleek high-speed train glide effortlessly across Java was inspiring. It also served as a reminder that Australia’s infrastructure ambitions have become far too modest. Perhaps it’s time to stop debating whether Australia can build world-class rail and instead start asking why nations with fewer resources are already doing it. Until then, Australians will continue watching other countries race ahead while we remain stuck in traffic.

jamiemcintyre

10,979 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Today marks the start of China’s annual Spring Festival travel rush, known as Chunyun. Over the next 40 days, the railway system is projected to handle 539 million trips, making it the largest periodic human migration in history. For at least three millennia, the Spring Festival has been China’s most significant holiday. “Going home for the family reunion” has become a deeply ingrained cultural expectation. About a quarter of China’s population consists of floating residents who live or work outside their registered hometowns, often in other cities or provinces. For them, rail travel is the preferred option, given that nearly every Chinese city with over 200k residents is connected by rail, not to mention the advantages of speed, affordability, and frequent services. The Spring Festival travel rush poses severe challenges to China’s public transportation system, especially its high-speed rail system. In 2008, a rare snowstorm hit the typically mild southern regions during the holiday, stranding 400k people at Guangzhou station for 11 days. This incident underscored the urgency for the government to accelerate high-speed rail development. Since then, China’s high-speed rail network has drawn lessons from daily operations, refining timetables and introducing new trains to prioritize safety, punctuality, and comfort. Today, amid hundreds of millions of passengers, the on-time rate during Chunyun reaches 99%, with no major accidents reported. In reality, China’s high-speed rail program started late and lacked any initial global advantages. During a visit to Japan in 1978, then China’s top leader-to-be Deng Xiaoping boarded Shinkansen and expressed admiration for the bullet train, remarking that it “urges China to run faster.” It took another 30 years for China to launch its first high-speed rail line, connecting the capital Beijing to Tianjin, with a distance comparable to New York to Philadelphia. By the end of 2025, China’s high-speed rail mileage exceeds twice the combined total of all other countries, enough to circle the equator 1.25 times. This expanded network meets the demands of a growing number of passengers, supported by features like mobile apps and real-name ticketing, which have put an end to the need to queue overnight at ticket counters as was routine decades ago. However, during Chunyun’s peak periods—such as the first and last days of the holiday—travelers still need to snap up tickets swiftly. Thus, for longer distances, many choose flights; others prefer the greater flexibility of self-driving, which has become the primary mode of transportation.

Sinical

157,654 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🇨🇳 358.36 km/h! Three Chinese teens just broke a Guinness World Record with a micro drone. Then someone asked: “Looks impressive, but what can it actually do?” Wrong question. The real “use” isn’t the record. It’s the entire capability chain behind it. And the signal it sends. This isn’t a toy. This is a strategic signal. These kids aren’t “playing with drones.” They’re speaking the engineering mother tongue of a nation. What does it mean when a few 16-year-olds can push a small quadcopter to 358.36 km/h? It means they understand: • Aerodynamics • Materials science • Motor tuning • Control algorithms • Manufacturing workflows • Testing protocols This is not a lucky experiment. It’s a microcosm of system-level engineering ability. And a glimpse into the future. In 10 years, these kids may be building: • Hypersonic AI-powered UAVs • Tactical drone swarms • Anti-missile jammers • High-speed logistics drones • Aerospace modules From racing drones to battlefield units — the path is clear. Fast. Cheap. Swarming. Hard to shoot down. Multi-mission capable: recon, EW, jamming, decoys. The modern battlefield isn’t just tanks and missiles. It’s saturation + speed + scale. And this is the tactical Lego block. What some people call “toys”… Military labs elsewhere call: alpha models. But here’s the most important part: This proves China’s education pipeline is alive. Americans panic at this not because of the drone, But because they’re losing 10,000+ STEM PhDs a year. Meanwhile, China’s prefecture-level high schools are making kids who build these in the wild. This is the real power gap. You see a record. China sees this: “Our talent pool is starting to self-organize.” America is: • Pushing engineers away • Turning schools into churches • Slashing research budgets China is: “Children are building 350 km/h drones in open fields.” So you ask: “What’s the use?” This is the use. This is why the future doesn’t belong to you. It belongs to the people still building it. Not a record. A civilization trajectory.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

51,877 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Elon Musk’s point about China is worth thinking about not because “China is peaceful,” but because China’s historical experience is fundamentally different from the Western imperial model we often use to interpret it. For much of its long history, China’s biggest wars were fought within China, not across oceans to build overseas colonies. Think about the scale of its history, the Three Kingdoms, the An Lushan Rebellion, the Mongol conquest, the Ming–Qing transition, the Taiping Rebellion, and countless periods of fragmentation and reunification. Some of these conflicts produced demographic catastrophes on a scale that is difficult to comprehend today. Elon frequently cited “70%” figure is debatable and shouldn’t be treated as a precise historical statistic. But the broader pattern is real, some of China’s bloodiest chapters were civil wars, rebellions and struggles over the reunification of the Chinese heartland. That matters because history shapes strategic culture. China is a continental civilisation with thousands of years of written history, repeatedly experiencing fragmentation, famine, invasion, reconstruction and reunification. Its strategic instinct has often been about maintaining internal cohesion, securing its borders and building economic strength. This doesn’t mean China has never expanded, fought neighbours or exercised imperial power, it absolutely has. And history is not destiny… But I think the mistake is assuming that China’s rise automatically follows the same trajectory as 19th-century European imperialism, overseas colonies, resource extraction and permanent expeditionary warfare. Look at what China has poured enormous resources into over the past few decades: high-speed rail, ports, manufacturing, cities, energy infrastructure, technology and industrial capacity. That tells us something, the question isn’t whether China is “good” or “bad”, the more useful question is what kind of superpower is China becoming? If we want to compete with China, collaborate with China, invest in China or simply understand China, we need to stop projecting our own historical experience onto it. You cannot understand a civilization with 5,000 years of history by viewing it through a 200-year-old Western lens.

Alvin Foo

322,438 просмотров • 15 дней назад