Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🇨🇳✈️ **China’s J-36 reportedly conducts another test flight** The Chinese **J-36**, a large tailless aircraft widely assessed as a sixth-generation fighter/technology demonstrator, has reportedly been spotted again during flight testing. Reports describe the aircraft as approximately **22 meters long**, weighing more than **50 tonnes**, and powered by **three engines**....

SprinterPress's profile picture

𝕊𝕡𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕻𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕤

798,624 subscribers

15,474 просмотров • 1 день назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Flight was "causing concern to civil authorities": Two Royal Air Force (RAF) Typhoon fighter jets were scrambled on the evening of July 24 to intercept Qatar Airways flight QR23 from Doha to Manchester after the aircraft became a cause for concern to UK civil aviation authorities upon entering British airspace. According to the RAF, a Quick Reaction Alert (QRA) was launched as a precaution. The Typhoons intercepted the Boeing 777-3DZ(ER) over the Nottingham area, although the escort was reportedly discontinued before the aircraft reached Manchester. The flight landed safely at Manchester Airport at approximately 7:45 p.m. BST, where emergency services had been placed on standby as a standard precaution. Authorities have not officially disclosed the reason for the interception. However, aviation tracking reports and industry sources suggest the incident may have been triggered by a temporary loss of radio communications between the aircraft and air traffic control, though this has not been confirmed by the RAF or Qatar Airways. The RAF said only that the flight was "causing concern to civil authorities" and confirmed that the incident was resolved without further issues, allowing the aircraft to taxi normally to its gate after landing. Civil aviation authorities are expected to review the event in coordination with Qatar Airways. #aircraft #airspace #airlines
0:14

Flight was "causing concern to civil authorities": Two Royal Air Force (RAF) Typhoon fighter jets were scrambled on the evening of July 24 to intercept Qatar Airways flight QR23 from Doha to Manchester after the aircraft became a cause for concern to UK civil aviation authorities upon entering British airspace. According to the RAF, a Quick Reaction Alert (QRA) was launched as a precaution. The Typhoons intercepted the Boeing 777-3DZ(ER) over the Nottingham area, although the escort was reportedly discontinued before the aircraft reached Manchester. The flight landed safely at Manchester Airport at approximately 7:45 p.m. BST, where emergency services had been placed on standby as a standard precaution. Authorities have not officially disclosed the reason for the interception. However, aviation tracking reports and industry sources suggest the incident may have been triggered by a temporary loss of radio communications between the aircraft and air traffic control, though this has not been confirmed by the RAF or Qatar Airways. The RAF said only that the flight was "causing concern to civil authorities" and confirmed that the incident was resolved without further issues, allowing the aircraft to taxi normally to its gate after landing. Civil aviation authorities are expected to review the event in coordination with Qatar Airways. #aircraft #airspace #airlines

FL360aero

20,938 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇮🇱Elbit Systems is developing an airborne high-power laser interception system as the next generation of air defense following the Iron Beam. The system is planned to be installed on fighter aircraft or helicopters and will be able to intercept incoming missiles and drones outside Israel’s airspace. Compared with ground-based laser systems, it offers greater mobility and the ability to engage targets both above and below cloud cover. The core technology combines multiple fiber lasers into a single high-power laser source, while enabling stable airborne targeting and precise engagement. Its accuracy has been described as “hitting a coin from 10 kilometers away.” Israel aims to eventually establish a squadron of laser-equipped aircraft that could rapidly take off during large-scale attacks and use low-cost laser interceptions to neutralize large numbers of incoming threats. The capability is expected to gradually become operational within the next few years. source:
0:17

🇮🇱Elbit Systems is developing an airborne high-power laser interception system as the next generation of air defense following the Iron Beam. The system is planned to be installed on fighter aircraft or helicopters and will be able to intercept incoming missiles and drones outside Israel’s airspace. Compared with ground-based laser systems, it offers greater mobility and the ability to engage targets both above and below cloud cover. The core technology combines multiple fiber lasers into a single high-power laser source, while enabling stable airborne targeting and precise engagement. Its accuracy has been described as “hitting a coin from 10 kilometers away.” Israel aims to eventually establish a squadron of laser-equipped aircraft that could rapidly take off during large-scale attacks and use low-cost laser interceptions to neutralize large numbers of incoming threats. The capability is expected to gradually become operational within the next few years. source:

笑脸男人

56,882 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

A Southwest Airlines flight from Burbank, California, safely landed in Las Vegas after performing an emergency maneuver to avoid colliding with another aircraft on Friday. Minutes after Southwest flight 1496 took off from Burbank, it rapidly descended 475 feet to avoid hitting another plane — dropping from 14,100 feet to 13,625 feet, according to flight tracking data and passenger accounts. The other aircraft was identified as a Hawk Hunter with the N-number "N335AX," which was at approximately 14,653 feet when the Southwest flight had to make its emergency descent. Southwest airlines said in a statement, "The Crew of Southwest Flight 1496 responded to two onboard traffic alerts Friday afternoon while climbing out of Burbank, Cal., requiring them to climb and descend to comply with the alerts. The flight continued to Las Vegas, where it landed uneventfully. Southwest is engaged with the Federal Aviation Administration to further understand the circumstances. No injuries were immediately reported by Customers, but two Flight Attendants are being treated for injuries. We appreciate the professionalism of our Flight Crew and Flight Attendants in responding to this event. Nothing is more important to Southwest than the Safety of our Customers and Employees."
0:18

A Southwest Airlines flight from Burbank, California, safely landed in Las Vegas after performing an emergency maneuver to avoid colliding with another aircraft on Friday. Minutes after Southwest flight 1496 took off from Burbank, it rapidly descended 475 feet to avoid hitting another plane — dropping from 14,100 feet to 13,625 feet, according to flight tracking data and passenger accounts. The other aircraft was identified as a Hawk Hunter with the N-number "N335AX," which was at approximately 14,653 feet when the Southwest flight had to make its emergency descent. Southwest airlines said in a statement, "The Crew of Southwest Flight 1496 responded to two onboard traffic alerts Friday afternoon while climbing out of Burbank, Cal., requiring them to climb and descend to comply with the alerts. The flight continued to Las Vegas, where it landed uneventfully. Southwest is engaged with the Federal Aviation Administration to further understand the circumstances. No injuries were immediately reported by Customers, but two Flight Attendants are being treated for injuries. We appreciate the professionalism of our Flight Crew and Flight Attendants in responding to this event. Nothing is more important to Southwest than the Safety of our Customers and Employees."

Breaking Aviation News & Videos

212,372 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇨🇳🇺🇲CHINA says New Y-30 Transport Will Outperform U.S. C-130J in Payload and Power. China's state-affiliated media and a recent analysis in Aerospace Knowledge (published by Beihang University) have highlighted the Y-30 as a next-generation medium-lift tactical transport aircraft intended to outperform the Lockheed Martin C-130J Super Hercules in several key areas. The Y-30 is a four-engine turboprop developed by Shaanxi Aircraft Industry Corporation (under AVIC). It completed its maiden flight in December 2025 and remains in the early prototype/testing phase, with no publicly confirmed production schedule or final operational specifications from official Chinese sources. According to the Chinese analysis, the Y-30 is positioned to surpass the C-130J in: 🔺️Engine power — Powered by four indigenous AEP-500 (or EP-500) turboprops, claimed to deliver significantly higher output than the C-130J's Rolls-Royce AE2100D3 engines. 🔺️Payload capacity — Targeted at around 30 tonnes (some reports mention up to 35 tonnes in certain configurations), compared to the C-130J's typical maximum payload of roughly 19–21 tonnes. 🔺️Structural design and materials — Extensive use of composites for reduced weight and improved strength, versus the C-130's more traditional all-metal airframe. 🔺️Avionics and flight control software — Modern integrated systems offering potential advantages in automation and performance.
0:14

🇨🇳🇺🇲CHINA says New Y-30 Transport Will Outperform U.S. C-130J in Payload and Power. China's state-affiliated media and a recent analysis in Aerospace Knowledge (published by Beihang University) have highlighted the Y-30 as a next-generation medium-lift tactical transport aircraft intended to outperform the Lockheed Martin C-130J Super Hercules in several key areas. The Y-30 is a four-engine turboprop developed by Shaanxi Aircraft Industry Corporation (under AVIC). It completed its maiden flight in December 2025 and remains in the early prototype/testing phase, with no publicly confirmed production schedule or final operational specifications from official Chinese sources. According to the Chinese analysis, the Y-30 is positioned to surpass the C-130J in: 🔺️Engine power — Powered by four indigenous AEP-500 (or EP-500) turboprops, claimed to deliver significantly higher output than the C-130J's Rolls-Royce AE2100D3 engines. 🔺️Payload capacity — Targeted at around 30 tonnes (some reports mention up to 35 tonnes in certain configurations), compared to the C-130J's typical maximum payload of roughly 19–21 tonnes. 🔺️Structural design and materials — Extensive use of composites for reduced weight and improved strength, versus the C-130's more traditional all-metal airframe. 🔺️Avionics and flight control software — Modern integrated systems offering potential advantages in automation and performance.

Global Surveillance

31,051 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🇨🇳🛫China's special mission aircraft expanding at breakneck speed Over the past decade, China has built one of the world’s largest and most modern fleets of airborne early-warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft, rapidly narrowing the gap with the US. 🔸New platforms like the KJ-700, KJ-3000, Y-9LG, Y-9GR, and Y-9PT continue to emerge at a remarkable pace 🔸China’s AEW&C capacity has increased by six to eight-fold, providing the PLA with high level of situational awareness 🔸Advanced electronic warfare assets such as the J-16D, J-15D, and multiple Y-9 variants strengthen China's ability to detect, disrupt, and suppress enemy systems 🔸Rapid iterative development and multipurpose aircraft designs are allowing China to field new capabilities faster and at larger scale than many competitors The PLA is increasingly capable of achieving information superiority across the Western Pacific, making Chinese special mission aircraft one of the most important aspects of China's military modernization.
0:16

🇨🇳🛫China's special mission aircraft expanding at breakneck speed Over the past decade, China has built one of the world’s largest and most modern fleets of airborne early-warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft, rapidly narrowing the gap with the US. 🔸New platforms like the KJ-700, KJ-3000, Y-9LG, Y-9GR, and Y-9PT continue to emerge at a remarkable pace 🔸China’s AEW&C capacity has increased by six to eight-fold, providing the PLA with high level of situational awareness 🔸Advanced electronic warfare assets such as the J-16D, J-15D, and multiple Y-9 variants strengthen China's ability to detect, disrupt, and suppress enemy systems 🔸Rapid iterative development and multipurpose aircraft designs are allowing China to field new capabilities faster and at larger scale than many competitors The PLA is increasingly capable of achieving information superiority across the Western Pacific, making Chinese special mission aircraft one of the most important aspects of China's military modernization.

Sputnik

17,105 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨🇨🇳 China's J-15T fighter achieves full carrier interoperability The J-15T was initially developed for the newest carrier Fujian (with EMALS catapults), but has now been successfully tested on the older ski-jump carriers Liaoning and Shandong, giving the Chinese Navy unprecedented operational flexibility. 🔸 The aircraft can now be moved between carriers depending on maintenance schedules, deployment plans, or operational needs 🔸 A single common fighter fleet simplifies logistics, reduces the need for separate spare parts and training programs, and lowers long-term costs 🔸 The J-15T features advanced avionics, radar, flight controls, and structural upgrades that allow it to handle both ski-jump and catapult launches 🔸 This interoperability ensures that each carrier can field a capable air wing without being restricted to a specific aircraft variant By ensuring its naval fighter can operate across different launch systems, China is building a more integrated, adaptable, and cost-effective carrier aviation force — strengthening its ability to project power across the western Pacific and beyond.
0:19

🚨🇨🇳 China's J-15T fighter achieves full carrier interoperability The J-15T was initially developed for the newest carrier Fujian (with EMALS catapults), but has now been successfully tested on the older ski-jump carriers Liaoning and Shandong, giving the Chinese Navy unprecedented operational flexibility. 🔸 The aircraft can now be moved between carriers depending on maintenance schedules, deployment plans, or operational needs 🔸 A single common fighter fleet simplifies logistics, reduces the need for separate spare parts and training programs, and lowers long-term costs 🔸 The J-15T features advanced avionics, radar, flight controls, and structural upgrades that allow it to handle both ski-jump and catapult launches 🔸 This interoperability ensures that each carrier can field a capable air wing without being restricted to a specific aircraft variant By ensuring its naval fighter can operate across different launch systems, China is building a more integrated, adaptable, and cost-effective carrier aviation force — strengthening its ability to project power across the western Pacific and beyond.

Sputnik

15,625 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Many people online speculate that the drones spotted in New Jersey might be the PteroDynamics Transwing X-P4. This drone transitions between two configurations: a quadcopter mode (7 feet by 4 feet) for vertical takeoff and landing and a fixed-wing airplane mode (7 feet by 13 feet) for efficient flight. PteroDynamics has contracts with the U.S. Navy, which tests drones at the Naval Air Station at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey. The company has also carried out test flights from the flight deck of the USNS Burlington, which is currently stationed in New Jersey. This capability might explain the drone sightings reported from the sea. These sightings are likely tied to classified U.S. Navy drone testing, which explains the federal government’s silence on the matter. If these drones are not the PteroDynamics X-P4, they are likely similar unmanned aerial systems being evaluated by the U.S. military. That's the most logical explanation for why the federal government is allowing these operations to happen. At this point, it appears to be as much an experiment in psychological operations as it is a test of drone technology.
0:17

Many people online speculate that the drones spotted in New Jersey might be the PteroDynamics Transwing X-P4. This drone transitions between two configurations: a quadcopter mode (7 feet by 4 feet) for vertical takeoff and landing and a fixed-wing airplane mode (7 feet by 13 feet) for efficient flight. PteroDynamics has contracts with the U.S. Navy, which tests drones at the Naval Air Station at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey. The company has also carried out test flights from the flight deck of the USNS Burlington, which is currently stationed in New Jersey. This capability might explain the drone sightings reported from the sea. These sightings are likely tied to classified U.S. Navy drone testing, which explains the federal government’s silence on the matter. If these drones are not the PteroDynamics X-P4, they are likely similar unmanned aerial systems being evaluated by the U.S. military. That's the most logical explanation for why the federal government is allowing these operations to happen. At this point, it appears to be as much an experiment in psychological operations as it is a test of drone technology.

KanekoaTheGreat

591,015 просмотров • 1 год назад

😓 Air India 🇮🇳 Flight AI171 with fully loaded Boeing 787-7 Dreamliner fatal accident: I‘m an airline pilot with >15‘000h of experience and a physics institute: My brief PRELIMINARY analysis of the visible facts from the video of the takeoff: * The flaps are only slightly extended, presumably to position 1 instead of 5. * The landing gear is still extended, which should have been retracted at this altitude and causes additional drag. * The aircraft is at a high angle of attack, which confirms the insufficient flap setting. * From the video and witness accounts, only low engine noise is audible. * Neither smoke nor fire is visible. * An engine failure is less likely. The most probable cause is presumably a human factor, an incorrectly chosen, insufficient flap setting for takeoff, and consequently an inadequately selected thrust. In this context, the correlated speeds were too low because they were calculated for a larger flap setting or a lighter aircraft. As a result, the aircraft took off with insufficient speed and intentionally but falsely derated thrust, was therefore on the unstable side, and rapidly lost more speed and altitude due to the additional failure to retract the landing gear in a timely manner, leading to a subsequent stall at low altitude and crash. For the experts: the aircraft got onto the wrong side of the speed vs drag curve and maneuvered itself into a corner from where there is no escape. Another possible cause could also have been an incorrect input of a wrong takeoff weight into the Flight Management System, resulting in too low thrust and too low speeds. The pilots got startled after takeoff, couldn’t wrap their head around what went wrong and incorrectly prioritized making an emergency call instead of flying the aircraft first, manually increasing thrust immediately to maximum, and retracting the landing gear. In summary of this very early and preliminary assessment (your confidence level should be as low as mine): The most probable cause is human error 😓 - as most of the time these days. Not because the pilots got worse (although that effect can be observed as well with prioritization of diversity over competence) - but because technology got so much better.
0:16

😓 Air India 🇮🇳 Flight AI171 with fully loaded Boeing 787-7 Dreamliner fatal accident: I‘m an airline pilot with >15‘000h of experience and a physics institute: My brief PRELIMINARY analysis of the visible facts from the video of the takeoff: * The flaps are only slightly extended, presumably to position 1 instead of 5. * The landing gear is still extended, which should have been retracted at this altitude and causes additional drag. * The aircraft is at a high angle of attack, which confirms the insufficient flap setting. * From the video and witness accounts, only low engine noise is audible. * Neither smoke nor fire is visible. * An engine failure is less likely. The most probable cause is presumably a human factor, an incorrectly chosen, insufficient flap setting for takeoff, and consequently an inadequately selected thrust. In this context, the correlated speeds were too low because they were calculated for a larger flap setting or a lighter aircraft. As a result, the aircraft took off with insufficient speed and intentionally but falsely derated thrust, was therefore on the unstable side, and rapidly lost more speed and altitude due to the additional failure to retract the landing gear in a timely manner, leading to a subsequent stall at low altitude and crash. For the experts: the aircraft got onto the wrong side of the speed vs drag curve and maneuvered itself into a corner from where there is no escape. Another possible cause could also have been an incorrect input of a wrong takeoff weight into the Flight Management System, resulting in too low thrust and too low speeds. The pilots got startled after takeoff, couldn’t wrap their head around what went wrong and incorrectly prioritized making an emergency call instead of flying the aircraft first, manually increasing thrust immediately to maximum, and retracting the landing gear. In summary of this very early and preliminary assessment (your confidence level should be as low as mine): The most probable cause is human error 😓 - as most of the time these days. Not because the pilots got worse (although that effect can be observed as well with prioritization of diversity over competence) - but because technology got so much better.

Iven‘s Dad

2,786,862 просмотров • 1 год назад

💥 The Chinese authorities have known for 4 years that a pilot of a China Eastern Airlines jet — flight MU5735 — deliberately crashed the aircraft, killing all 132 aboard, according to data from the US. The data, released by the 🇺🇸 National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), confirms earlier leaked US accounts that Flight 5735, a Boeing 737, was intentionally crashed into mountains in Guangxi in Mar 2022. The NTSB readings from the flight recorders show two pilots wrestling over the controls after both engines were shut down by hand, the automatic pilot was switched off and the jet was pushed into a nosedive as it cruised between Kunming and Guangzhou. In the face of public anger, Beijing has failed to publish a report. Last July the Chinese Civil Aviation Administration responded to an inquiry with a warning that “disclosure [about the crash] may, if released, endanger national security and social stability”. Beijing is under pressure from international aviation organizations to come clean over the disaster, which appears to have followed a similar pattern to suspected murder-suicide acts by airline pilots that have killed hundreds since 2014. The NTSB was asked to decode the flight recorders of Flight 5735 and transmitted its readings to China two weeks after their recovery in 2022. The US agency released extracts from its findings on Thursday in response to a Chinese citizen’s freedom of information request. “It was found that while cruising at 29,000ft, the fuel switches on both engines moved from the run position to the cut-off position,” the NTSB said. “Engine speeds decreased after the fuel switch movement.” Graphs of control inputs and the aircraft’s movement showed a pilot’s yoke pushing the aircraft into a steep dive and efforts by the other pilot to halt the dive. The two pilots were turning their yokes in opposite directions, commanding left or right rolls from the ailerons on the edges of the wings. The report said that a power failure had halted the data recorder after 90 seconds but the battery-powered crew voice recorder had continued. The agency did not reveal the contents, which it transmitted to Beijing at the time and said it had not stored a copy. Video from the ground showed the Boeing plunging vertically. The crew made no radio calls and no emergency radar code was transmitted. Previous Chinese reports have said that all systems appeared to have been functioning normally. Two months after the crash, a US investigator said “the plane did what it was told to do by someone in the cockpit”. China removed all references to that report, including screenshots, from social media. Three pilots were on the flight deck. Captain Yang Hongda, Zhang Zhengping, the first officer, and Ni Gongtao, a second officer in training. Speculation in China has centred on Zhang, one of the airline’s most experienced pilots, who had recently been demoted from his captain’s rank.
0:14

💥 The Chinese authorities have known for 4 years that a pilot of a China Eastern Airlines jet — flight MU5735 — deliberately crashed the aircraft, killing all 132 aboard, according to data from the US. The data, released by the 🇺🇸 National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), confirms earlier leaked US accounts that Flight 5735, a Boeing 737, was intentionally crashed into mountains in Guangxi in Mar 2022. The NTSB readings from the flight recorders show two pilots wrestling over the controls after both engines were shut down by hand, the automatic pilot was switched off and the jet was pushed into a nosedive as it cruised between Kunming and Guangzhou. In the face of public anger, Beijing has failed to publish a report. Last July the Chinese Civil Aviation Administration responded to an inquiry with a warning that “disclosure [about the crash] may, if released, endanger national security and social stability”. Beijing is under pressure from international aviation organizations to come clean over the disaster, which appears to have followed a similar pattern to suspected murder-suicide acts by airline pilots that have killed hundreds since 2014. The NTSB was asked to decode the flight recorders of Flight 5735 and transmitted its readings to China two weeks after their recovery in 2022. The US agency released extracts from its findings on Thursday in response to a Chinese citizen’s freedom of information request. “It was found that while cruising at 29,000ft, the fuel switches on both engines moved from the run position to the cut-off position,” the NTSB said. “Engine speeds decreased after the fuel switch movement.” Graphs of control inputs and the aircraft’s movement showed a pilot’s yoke pushing the aircraft into a steep dive and efforts by the other pilot to halt the dive. The two pilots were turning their yokes in opposite directions, commanding left or right rolls from the ailerons on the edges of the wings. The report said that a power failure had halted the data recorder after 90 seconds but the battery-powered crew voice recorder had continued. The agency did not reveal the contents, which it transmitted to Beijing at the time and said it had not stored a copy. Video from the ground showed the Boeing plunging vertically. The crew made no radio calls and no emergency radar code was transmitted. Previous Chinese reports have said that all systems appeared to have been functioning normally. Two months after the crash, a US investigator said “the plane did what it was told to do by someone in the cockpit”. China removed all references to that report, including screenshots, from social media. Three pilots were on the flight deck. Captain Yang Hongda, Zhang Zhengping, the first officer, and Ni Gongtao, a second officer in training. Speculation in China has centred on Zhang, one of the airline’s most experienced pilots, who had recently been demoted from his captain’s rank.

Byron Wan

365,447 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

💥 This is an online briefing circulating about the incident (The incident site was only about four miles from Zhongnanhai) : Incident No.: 2026-06-26-STFS-01 Incident Type: Suspected crash after loss of contact during general aviation local training Date of Incident: June 26, 2026 Time of Incident: 17:30–17:40 Location: Beijing Shifosi General Aviation Airport and the airspace near the East Fifth Ring Road to its west Operating Unit: Dongshi Shuangyue (Beijing) General Aviation Co., Ltd. Aircraft Information: Registration No. B-12PP Flight Personnel: Liu Junhua, a club member conducting a local solo flight I. Flight Overview This was a solo training flight by a club member within the local airspace, with the planned training subject being local takeoffs and landings. At 17:30, the aircraft took off normally from Shifosi Airport. At 17:40, as the crew prepared to return for landing and join the westbound traffic pattern for Runway 18, abnormal control behavior occurred. The aircraft did not properly enter the local traffic pattern. Instead, it continued maintaining a heading of 270 degrees due west and flew beyond the local controlled airspace. Local ADS-B monitoring continued until the aircraft reached the area near Beijing’s East Fifth Ring Road, after which its signal disappeared. The ground control tower then coordinated with regional approach control and Air Force control authorities, making repeated radio calls, but received no response. The aircraft lost contact. II. Key Timeline At 17:30, B-12PP took off from Shifosi Airport for a local solo training flight. At 17:40, it prepared to join the west-side traffic pattern for Runway 18 for approach and landing. The aircraft’s heading became abnormal, continuing on a 270-degree heading and flying westward out of the local airspace. The flight track reached the area near the East Fifth Ring Road, where the ADS-B signal was lost. Approach control and Air Force control were contacted, but the aircraft never responded by radio and was considered missing. III. Preliminary Risk and Problem Analysis Insufficient solo-flight control: The member was flying alone, without instructor monitoring, meaning there was no condition for intervention or emergency handling once a special situation occurred. Severe deviation from the flight pattern: During the approach phase, the aircraft failed to fly according to the standard traffic pattern. Its heading continued to deviate, causing it to cross the boundary and enter sensitive airspace over the city. Complete failure of communication and surveillance: ADS-B and radio communication failed, creating extremely high risk. Serious airspace safety hazard: A low-altitude general aviation aircraft crossed the boundary into the airspace above a built-up urban area, posing major safety risks on the ground. IV. Possible Causes Pending confirmation by official investigation Human factors: Pilot error, spatial disorientation, physical incapacitation, etc. Mechanical failure: Failure of the flight control system, engine, or electrical system, causing the heading to become uncorrectable and communication/surveillance to be interrupted. Equipment failure: Failure of ADS-B or the radio transponder, resulting in loss of signal and inability to establish contact. Some people online also found a photo of a Liu Junhua who is deputy general manager of the Discretionary Mandate and Solutions Department at CITIC Bank’s Asset Management Business Center, and claimed that she was the aircraft’s pilot. The building that was struck, China Zun — also known as CITIC Tower — is precisely where CITIC Group is headquartered. However, others have come forward saying that the pilot was not the Liu Junhua from CITIC. There are also two LinkedIn photos of Liu Junhua from CITIC in the comment section.
0:10

💥 This is an online briefing circulating about the incident (The incident site was only about four miles from Zhongnanhai) : Incident No.: 2026-06-26-STFS-01 Incident Type: Suspected crash after loss of contact during general aviation local training Date of Incident: June 26, 2026 Time of Incident: 17:30–17:40 Location: Beijing Shifosi General Aviation Airport and the airspace near the East Fifth Ring Road to its west Operating Unit: Dongshi Shuangyue (Beijing) General Aviation Co., Ltd. Aircraft Information: Registration No. B-12PP Flight Personnel: Liu Junhua, a club member conducting a local solo flight I. Flight Overview This was a solo training flight by a club member within the local airspace, with the planned training subject being local takeoffs and landings. At 17:30, the aircraft took off normally from Shifosi Airport. At 17:40, as the crew prepared to return for landing and join the westbound traffic pattern for Runway 18, abnormal control behavior occurred. The aircraft did not properly enter the local traffic pattern. Instead, it continued maintaining a heading of 270 degrees due west and flew beyond the local controlled airspace. Local ADS-B monitoring continued until the aircraft reached the area near Beijing’s East Fifth Ring Road, after which its signal disappeared. The ground control tower then coordinated with regional approach control and Air Force control authorities, making repeated radio calls, but received no response. The aircraft lost contact. II. Key Timeline At 17:30, B-12PP took off from Shifosi Airport for a local solo training flight. At 17:40, it prepared to join the west-side traffic pattern for Runway 18 for approach and landing. The aircraft’s heading became abnormal, continuing on a 270-degree heading and flying westward out of the local airspace. The flight track reached the area near the East Fifth Ring Road, where the ADS-B signal was lost. Approach control and Air Force control were contacted, but the aircraft never responded by radio and was considered missing. III. Preliminary Risk and Problem Analysis Insufficient solo-flight control: The member was flying alone, without instructor monitoring, meaning there was no condition for intervention or emergency handling once a special situation occurred. Severe deviation from the flight pattern: During the approach phase, the aircraft failed to fly according to the standard traffic pattern. Its heading continued to deviate, causing it to cross the boundary and enter sensitive airspace over the city. Complete failure of communication and surveillance: ADS-B and radio communication failed, creating extremely high risk. Serious airspace safety hazard: A low-altitude general aviation aircraft crossed the boundary into the airspace above a built-up urban area, posing major safety risks on the ground. IV. Possible Causes Pending confirmation by official investigation Human factors: Pilot error, spatial disorientation, physical incapacitation, etc. Mechanical failure: Failure of the flight control system, engine, or electrical system, causing the heading to become uncorrectable and communication/surveillance to be interrupted. Equipment failure: Failure of ADS-B or the radio transponder, resulting in loss of signal and inability to establish contact. Some people online also found a photo of a Liu Junhua who is deputy general manager of the Discretionary Mandate and Solutions Department at CITIC Bank’s Asset Management Business Center, and claimed that she was the aircraft’s pilot. The building that was struck, China Zun — also known as CITIC Tower — is precisely where CITIC Group is headquartered. However, others have come forward saying that the pilot was not the Liu Junhua from CITIC. There are also two LinkedIn photos of Liu Junhua from CITIC in the comment section.

Inconvenient Truths — Jennifer Zeng Reports

433,155 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

China has flight-tested a 60-kilowatt hybrid propulsion system designed for small battlefield drones. The system lets drones generate electricity from fuel in flight, then switch to silent electric mode when the mission demands it. The result: longer range, lower noise, and a reduced heat signature. That dual-mode capability matters most precisely where stealth and endurance have to be traded against each other. It fits a larger pattern. China has simultaneously tested 3D-printed jet engines for low-cost disposable drones, deployed AI-driven swarm systems, and integrated long-range maritime strike missiles with drone-based targeting. Converted J-6 jets are now stationed near the Taiwan Strait. China is not building a drone force. It is building a fully integrated unmanned combat ecosystem, from cheap expendables by the thousands to stealth platforms capable of guiding anti-ship ballistic missiles deep into the western Pacific. The hybrid engine is not a curiosity. It is the logic behind everything else. Gandalv / Gandalv
0:10

China has flight-tested a 60-kilowatt hybrid propulsion system designed for small battlefield drones. The system lets drones generate electricity from fuel in flight, then switch to silent electric mode when the mission demands it. The result: longer range, lower noise, and a reduced heat signature. That dual-mode capability matters most precisely where stealth and endurance have to be traded against each other. It fits a larger pattern. China has simultaneously tested 3D-printed jet engines for low-cost disposable drones, deployed AI-driven swarm systems, and integrated long-range maritime strike missiles with drone-based targeting. Converted J-6 jets are now stationed near the Taiwan Strait. China is not building a drone force. It is building a fully integrated unmanned combat ecosystem, from cheap expendables by the thousands to stealth platforms capable of guiding anti-ship ballistic missiles deep into the western Pacific. The hybrid engine is not a curiosity. It is the logic behind everything else. Gandalv / Gandalv

Gandalv

16,051 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

#PLA #China #Japan #Korea #Guam #India #Hypersonic The Chinese 6th generation fighter is a high-quality reverse engineering of the American 6th generation fighter project from Lockheed Martin as part of the NGAD (Next-Generation Air Dominance) program. The Chinese Air Force has begun flight tests of a 6th-generation stealth fighter designed using a "flying wing"/"tailless" configuration without the usual vertical and horizontal all-moving tail fins typical of 4th and 5th generation aircraft. The machine is stabilized in flight thanks to an advanced computerized fly-by-wire control system with multiple backup systems, which controls the wing mechanization on the trailing edge. The design has a huge resemblance to that of the Lockheed project under the NGAD program. It is worth noting that the visible length of the glider can vary from 22.5 to 25 - 27 m, while the wingspan reaches an incredible 18 - 19 m. Obviously, the normal takeoff weight of such a machine can reach 33 - 37 tons, the maximum - 43 - 47 tons. The payload in the internal weapons compartments is up to 10 - 12 tons. The estimated volume of the fuel system can reach 17-18 tons, and the combat radius of action up to 2500-2700 km. The effective reflective surface of this machine can vary from 0.05 to 0.15 sq. m The configuration of the onboard radar of the Chinese 5th generation fighter is almost identical to that of the Russian Su-57. On the side forming the nose of the fuselage, one can pay attention to 2 X-band side-looking AESA modules, similar to the N036B-1-01L and N036B-1-01B modules of the Belka onboard radar system. These canvases provide radar reconnaissance in SAR mode at distances of up to 150-200 km, as well as the ability to detect air targets in the lateral and rear hemisphere Evgeniy Damantsev
0:17

#PLA #China #Japan #Korea #Guam #India #Hypersonic The Chinese 6th generation fighter is a high-quality reverse engineering of the American 6th generation fighter project from Lockheed Martin as part of the NGAD (Next-Generation Air Dominance) program. The Chinese Air Force has begun flight tests of a 6th-generation stealth fighter designed using a "flying wing"/"tailless" configuration without the usual vertical and horizontal all-moving tail fins typical of 4th and 5th generation aircraft. The machine is stabilized in flight thanks to an advanced computerized fly-by-wire control system with multiple backup systems, which controls the wing mechanization on the trailing edge. The design has a huge resemblance to that of the Lockheed project under the NGAD program. It is worth noting that the visible length of the glider can vary from 22.5 to 25 - 27 m, while the wingspan reaches an incredible 18 - 19 m. Obviously, the normal takeoff weight of such a machine can reach 33 - 37 tons, the maximum - 43 - 47 tons. The payload in the internal weapons compartments is up to 10 - 12 tons. The estimated volume of the fuel system can reach 17-18 tons, and the combat radius of action up to 2500-2700 km. The effective reflective surface of this machine can vary from 0.05 to 0.15 sq. m The configuration of the onboard radar of the Chinese 5th generation fighter is almost identical to that of the Russian Su-57. On the side forming the nose of the fuselage, one can pay attention to 2 X-band side-looking AESA modules, similar to the N036B-1-01L and N036B-1-01B modules of the Belka onboard radar system. These canvases provide radar reconnaissance in SAR mode at distances of up to 150-200 km, as well as the ability to detect air targets in the lateral and rear hemisphere Evgeniy Damantsev

Koba

40,346 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 NASA’S X-59 JUST BROKE THE SOUND BARRIER AND IT DID IT QUIETLY. For decades, supersonic flight over land has been banned in most countries because of the loud sonic boom it creates. NASA’s experimental X-59 is trying to change that. The aircraft, developed with Lockheed Martin, is shaped in a very specific way to reshape the shockwaves that form during supersonic flight. Instead of a loud, window-rattling boom, it’s designed to produce a much softer “thump” that reaches the ground. In its first supersonic flight, the X-59 reached Mach 1.1 while testing this quiet sonic boom technology. Why this matters: • If successful, it could reopen the possibility of supersonic passenger flights over populated areas • Current supersonic jets (like the retired Concorde) were too loud for overland routes • The X-59 doesn’t carry passengers — it’s a flying testbed for the technology • Quieter supersonic flight could dramatically cut long-distance travel times in the future The deeper implication: This isn’t just about going faster. It’s about removing one of the biggest barriers that has kept supersonic travel from becoming practical for regular people. For over 50 years, the sonic boom has been the main reason we’ve been stuck flying at subsonic speeds on most routes. If NASA and its partners can prove that a shaped aircraft can turn a loud boom into a gentle thump, it could fundamentally change how we think about long-distance air travel in the coming decades. We may be watching the return of supersonic flight just much quieter this time. Do you think quiet supersonic passenger planes will become a reality in your lifetime? Follow for more frontier aerospace and aviation technology.
0:10

🚨 NASA’S X-59 JUST BROKE THE SOUND BARRIER AND IT DID IT QUIETLY. For decades, supersonic flight over land has been banned in most countries because of the loud sonic boom it creates. NASA’s experimental X-59 is trying to change that. The aircraft, developed with Lockheed Martin, is shaped in a very specific way to reshape the shockwaves that form during supersonic flight. Instead of a loud, window-rattling boom, it’s designed to produce a much softer “thump” that reaches the ground. In its first supersonic flight, the X-59 reached Mach 1.1 while testing this quiet sonic boom technology. Why this matters: • If successful, it could reopen the possibility of supersonic passenger flights over populated areas • Current supersonic jets (like the retired Concorde) were too loud for overland routes • The X-59 doesn’t carry passengers — it’s a flying testbed for the technology • Quieter supersonic flight could dramatically cut long-distance travel times in the future The deeper implication: This isn’t just about going faster. It’s about removing one of the biggest barriers that has kept supersonic travel from becoming practical for regular people. For over 50 years, the sonic boom has been the main reason we’ve been stuck flying at subsonic speeds on most routes. If NASA and its partners can prove that a shaped aircraft can turn a loud boom into a gentle thump, it could fundamentally change how we think about long-distance air travel in the coming decades. We may be watching the return of supersonic flight just much quieter this time. Do you think quiet supersonic passenger planes will become a reality in your lifetime? Follow for more frontier aerospace and aviation technology.

TheNewPhysics

138,033 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

𝐏𝐂𝐆 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝 𝐘𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐁𝐮𝐨𝐲 𝐚𝐭 𝐁𝐚𝐣𝐨 𝐝𝐞 𝐌𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐥𝐨𝐜 𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐚𝐥 The Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) today discovered a second yellow floating buoy installed at the northern tip of Bajo de Masinloc Shoal during a routine Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA) flight conducted this morning. This follows the monitoring of an initial buoy placed in the center of the shoal yesterday, highlighting ongoing activities in the area. Moreover, the PCG has secured the precise coordinates of a reported structure observed during yesterday's operations. These coordinates have enabled a thorough review of historical satellite imagery, confirming the presence of structural debris dating back at least two years. This verification underscores that the debris is longstanding and not indicative of recent construction. Consequently, the PCG's MDA flight was subjected to aggressive interference by forces from the People's Republic of China (PRC). Immediately following the low-altitude pass of a People's Liberation Army (PLA) Navy helicopter directly beneath the PCG aircraft, a PLA Air Force Shenyang J-16 fighter jet was deployed to harass and endanger the safe flight path. Such actions pose a clear and unacceptable risk to the safety of PCG personnel and the journalists embedded on the mission. In the face of such aggressive actions, the PCG remains steadfast in its commitment to uphold international law and safeguard maritime jurisdiction in the West Philippine Sea.
0:15

𝐏𝐂𝐆 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝 𝐘𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐁𝐮𝐨𝐲 𝐚𝐭 𝐁𝐚𝐣𝐨 𝐝𝐞 𝐌𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐥𝐨𝐜 𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐚𝐥 The Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) today discovered a second yellow floating buoy installed at the northern tip of Bajo de Masinloc Shoal during a routine Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA) flight conducted this morning. This follows the monitoring of an initial buoy placed in the center of the shoal yesterday, highlighting ongoing activities in the area. Moreover, the PCG has secured the precise coordinates of a reported structure observed during yesterday's operations. These coordinates have enabled a thorough review of historical satellite imagery, confirming the presence of structural debris dating back at least two years. This verification underscores that the debris is longstanding and not indicative of recent construction. Consequently, the PCG's MDA flight was subjected to aggressive interference by forces from the People's Republic of China (PRC). Immediately following the low-altitude pass of a People's Liberation Army (PLA) Navy helicopter directly beneath the PCG aircraft, a PLA Air Force Shenyang J-16 fighter jet was deployed to harass and endanger the safe flight path. Such actions pose a clear and unacceptable risk to the safety of PCG personnel and the journalists embedded on the mission. In the face of such aggressive actions, the PCG remains steadfast in its commitment to uphold international law and safeguard maritime jurisdiction in the West Philippine Sea.

Jay Tarriela

156,721 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

‼️🇺🇲🇨🇳 For the first time, the U.S. Air Force has publicly announced the launch of a Long-Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM) from a B-2 bomber. The test took place during recent exercises north of the Mariana Islands in the Pacific Ocean, with reports confirming that the target ship was successfully struck. The bomber utilized the LRASM anti-ship missile, which features a range of approximately 370 kilometers and a 450-kilogram warhead. As a reminder, this missile has already been integrated onto F/A-18E/F Super Hornet carrier-based fighters and B-1B Lancer bombers. Work is also underway to integrate it onto P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft, as well as F-15EX and F-35 fighters. The capability to deploy LRASMs from B-2 Spirit bombers could mark a highly significant development, as the range and low radar observability (stealth) of these aircraft unlock new operational possibilities for utilizing these anti-ship missiles. Furthermore, conducting this test specifically in the Pacific region can be interpreted as a very clear hint directed at China. Video is made Grok AI
0:10

‼️🇺🇲🇨🇳 For the first time, the U.S. Air Force has publicly announced the launch of a Long-Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM) from a B-2 bomber. The test took place during recent exercises north of the Mariana Islands in the Pacific Ocean, with reports confirming that the target ship was successfully struck. The bomber utilized the LRASM anti-ship missile, which features a range of approximately 370 kilometers and a 450-kilogram warhead. As a reminder, this missile has already been integrated onto F/A-18E/F Super Hornet carrier-based fighters and B-1B Lancer bombers. Work is also underway to integrate it onto P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft, as well as F-15EX and F-35 fighters. The capability to deploy LRASMs from B-2 Spirit bombers could mark a highly significant development, as the range and low radar observability (stealth) of these aircraft unlock new operational possibilities for utilizing these anti-ship missiles. Furthermore, conducting this test specifically in the Pacific region can be interpreted as a very clear hint directed at China. Video is made Grok AI

Visioner

61,787 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 NASA-BACKED CONCEPT SHOWS A 100+ SEAT AIRLINER THAT COULD BE UP TO 17% MORE EFFICIENT THAN FUTURE PROJECTIONS. Electra has unveiled a new turbo-electric aircraft concept developed under NASA’s AACES 2050 program. The design uses a double-bubble fuselage and electrically driven tail fans to recover energy from the airflow that normally trails behind an aircraft. Two conventional turbofan engines under the wings generate electricity, which powers fans mounted at the rear. These fans ingest and re-energize the slow-moving boundary layer air flowing over the fuselage a technique known as boundary layer ingestion. This reduces wasted energy in the aircraft’s wake. Why this matters: • The concept is designed to fit within existing airport infrastructure and airline operations • It doesn’t require new charging stations or alternative fuels it can run on jet fuel or sustainable aviation fuel • The double-bubble fuselage generates more lift from the body itself, allowing a twin-aisle cabin in a narrower overall aircraft • The study suggests up to a 17% efficiency gain beyond what’s already expected from future improvements in engines, structures, and aerodynamics The deeper implication: Most future aircraft concepts focus on either radical new propulsion (like hydrogen or all-electric) or incremental improvements to conventional designs. This concept takes a middle path using electrification not to replace engines entirely, but to unlock aerodynamic improvements that were previously impractical. It shows how hybrid-electric systems could help bridge the gap between today’s aircraft and much more efficient future designs. Follow for more frontier aviation technology and NASA-backed research into the future of flight.
0:10

🚨 NASA-BACKED CONCEPT SHOWS A 100+ SEAT AIRLINER THAT COULD BE UP TO 17% MORE EFFICIENT THAN FUTURE PROJECTIONS. Electra has unveiled a new turbo-electric aircraft concept developed under NASA’s AACES 2050 program. The design uses a double-bubble fuselage and electrically driven tail fans to recover energy from the airflow that normally trails behind an aircraft. Two conventional turbofan engines under the wings generate electricity, which powers fans mounted at the rear. These fans ingest and re-energize the slow-moving boundary layer air flowing over the fuselage a technique known as boundary layer ingestion. This reduces wasted energy in the aircraft’s wake. Why this matters: • The concept is designed to fit within existing airport infrastructure and airline operations • It doesn’t require new charging stations or alternative fuels it can run on jet fuel or sustainable aviation fuel • The double-bubble fuselage generates more lift from the body itself, allowing a twin-aisle cabin in a narrower overall aircraft • The study suggests up to a 17% efficiency gain beyond what’s already expected from future improvements in engines, structures, and aerodynamics The deeper implication: Most future aircraft concepts focus on either radical new propulsion (like hydrogen or all-electric) or incremental improvements to conventional designs. This concept takes a middle path using electrification not to replace engines entirely, but to unlock aerodynamic improvements that were previously impractical. It shows how hybrid-electric systems could help bridge the gap between today’s aircraft and much more efficient future designs. Follow for more frontier aviation technology and NASA-backed research into the future of flight.

TheNewPhysics

54,001 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Unverified reports circulating on Chinese social media claim a large deployment of Chinese law enforcement personnel has arrived in Cambodia. According to multiple online sources, more than 2,000 Chinese police officers (seems quite inflated) are said to be involved, with claims that senior officials are included. The reports allege an upcoming comprehensive inspection targeting Jinwan Park (金湾园区), Jinwan three, and other “gold-linked” compounds. The same sources say that as of last night, roughly ninety percent of companies connected to Jinwan-linked sites had begun urgent relocations. Additional claims link the person in charge of Jinwan three to the former five-A (5A) zone, an area reportedly under heightened scrutiny due to the number of illegal operations previously based there. Some posts suggest personnel inside five-A–linked sites may already be facing shutdowns or questioning. None of this has been independently verified. If accurate, it would help explain the sudden, large-scale movements reported across multiple Jinwan-associated compounds.
0:13

Unverified reports circulating on Chinese social media claim a large deployment of Chinese law enforcement personnel has arrived in Cambodia. According to multiple online sources, more than 2,000 Chinese police officers (seems quite inflated) are said to be involved, with claims that senior officials are included. The reports allege an upcoming comprehensive inspection targeting Jinwan Park (金湾园区), Jinwan three, and other “gold-linked” compounds. The same sources say that as of last night, roughly ninety percent of companies connected to Jinwan-linked sites had begun urgent relocations. Additional claims link the person in charge of Jinwan three to the former five-A (5A) zone, an area reportedly under heightened scrutiny due to the number of illegal operations previously based there. Some posts suggest personnel inside five-A–linked sites may already be facing shutdowns or questioning. None of this has been independently verified. If accurate, it would help explain the sudden, large-scale movements reported across multiple Jinwan-associated compounds.

Jacob in Cambodia 🇺🇸 🇰🇭

48,321 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад