Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

‼️🇨🇳🇺🇸China's Nuclear Buildup: Deterrence or Coercion?💥 China continues its rapid deployment of mobile ICBMs from the DF series (DF-31, DF-41, and now DF-41A variants), with recent estimates showing hundreds of new launchers and silo-based systems becoming operational. Simultaneously, Beijing openly signals the potential for military coercion against Taiwan and... show more

Defense Intelligence

322,945 subscribers

30,258 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇨🇳☢️ China showcased its DF-5C intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) at the Beijing parade. With a global strike radius, the DF-5C is capable of carrying multiple nuclear warheads and reaching any point on Earth.

🇨🇳☢️ China showcased its DF-5C intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) at the Beijing parade. With a global strike radius, the DF-5C is capable of carrying multiple nuclear warheads and reaching any point on Earth.

DD Geopolitics

95,527 views • 1 year ago

🇨🇳🎖️Beijing held the largest military parade in China’s history. The main guests were Putin and Kim Jong Un According to Bloomberg, nearly the entire center of Beijing was closed for the parade, and some residents were ordered to leave their homes🚫 ✨Among the new weapons showcased were the DF-5C intercontinental ballistic missile, capable of reaching anywhere on the planet , new mobile ground-based systems with the DF-61 ICBM, the AJX002 underwater drone, and laser weapons.

🇨🇳🎖️Beijing held the largest military parade in China’s history. The main guests were Putin and Kim Jong Un According to Bloomberg, nearly the entire center of Beijing was closed for the parade, and some residents were ordered to leave their homes🚫 ✨Among the new weapons showcased were the DF-5C intercontinental ballistic missile, capable of reaching anywhere on the planet , new mobile ground-based systems with the DF-61 ICBM, the AJX002 underwater drone, and laser weapons.

NEXTA

99,456 views • 1 year ago

The largest military parade in China’s history. For the first time, Beijing unveiled the DF-5C intercontinental nuclear missile with a strike radius covering the entire planet. China also showcased: •The full nuclear triad - strategic land, sea, and air-based forces. •Its military space and cyber forces. •The AJX002 underwater drone and new laser weapons. The parade featured over 10,000 troops and hundreds of units of military equipment and aircraft. Drones:

The largest military parade in China’s history. For the first time, Beijing unveiled the DF-5C intercontinental nuclear missile with a strike radius covering the entire planet. China also showcased: •The full nuclear triad - strategic land, sea, and air-based forces. •Its military space and cyber forces. •The AJX002 underwater drone and new laser weapons. The parade featured over 10,000 troops and hundreds of units of military equipment and aircraft. Drones:

Maria Drutska 🇺🇦

234,016 views • 1 year ago

🚨🇨🇳 PENTAGON'S NIGHTMARE: CHINA DEPLOYS DF-27 SHIP-SLAYER ACROSS PACIFIC China’s DF-27 mobile hypersonic missile system is now openly rolling on public roads — and Western intel is scrambling. This missile is built to sink carriers and hammer distant naval bases from thousands of kilometers away, turning the US fleet posture into a liability. 🔸 DF-27 spotted in convoy on Hebei roads, April 2026 — three launchers under tarps, same chassis as DF-26 but with extended nose section over the cab 🔸 5,000–8,000 km range with hypersonic glide vehicle hitting Mach 5+ on maneuvering trajectory — tested 2,100 km in 12 minutes 🔸 Designed to shred carrier strike groups and bases across the First, Second, and Third Island Chains — Pacific and Indian Ocean ops now under direct threat 🔸 Built from DF-17/DF-26 lessons, solid-fuel, road-mobile, near-impossible to track once launched. Do you think the U.S. can stop China’s hypersonic DF-27?

🚨🇨🇳 PENTAGON'S NIGHTMARE: CHINA DEPLOYS DF-27 SHIP-SLAYER ACROSS PACIFIC China’s DF-27 mobile hypersonic missile system is now openly rolling on public roads — and Western intel is scrambling. This missile is built to sink carriers and hammer distant naval bases from thousands of kilometers away, turning the US fleet posture into a liability. 🔸 DF-27 spotted in convoy on Hebei roads, April 2026 — three launchers under tarps, same chassis as DF-26 but with extended nose section over the cab 🔸 5,000–8,000 km range with hypersonic glide vehicle hitting Mach 5+ on maneuvering trajectory — tested 2,100 km in 12 minutes 🔸 Designed to shred carrier strike groups and bases across the First, Second, and Third Island Chains — Pacific and Indian Ocean ops now under direct threat 🔸 Built from DF-17/DF-26 lessons, solid-fuel, road-mobile, near-impossible to track once launched. Do you think the U.S. can stop China’s hypersonic DF-27?

NewRulesGeopolitics

16,947 views • 3 months ago

❗️🇺🇸🇨🇳 #BREAKING China has repeatedly warned the United States and its allies against expanding what it labels “NATO-style” alliances in the Indo-Pacific, particularly over Taiwan. Washington and its partners say frameworks like AUKUS and the Quad are meant for deterrence and regional stability, not collective defense. Beijing, however, views them as encroachment on its sphere of influence, increasing the risk of a major regional conflict. See the latest updates with us: NSTRIKE

❗️🇺🇸🇨🇳 #BREAKING China has repeatedly warned the United States and its allies against expanding what it labels “NATO-style” alliances in the Indo-Pacific, particularly over Taiwan. Washington and its partners say frameworks like AUKUS and the Quad are meant for deterrence and regional stability, not collective defense. Beijing, however, views them as encroachment on its sphere of influence, increasing the risk of a major regional conflict. See the latest updates with us: NSTRIKE

NSTRIKE

214,136 views • 8 months ago

$🚨🇮🇷🇨🇳If America Can’t Handle Iranian Missiles, It’s Not Ready for China In just the first 16 days of war against Iran, the United States expended nearly 40% of its THAAD interceptors. If America’s most advanced air defenses are struggling against Iran—a regional power with a fraction of China’s capabilities—there is no plausible scenario in which the US is ready for a showdown with Beijing. The Chinese Arsenal The People’s Liberation Army operates the world’s largest missile inventory, backed by a rapid-action doctrine designed to dismantle U.S. bases and infrastructure in the early stages of conflict. Unlike Iran’s Kheibar Shikan and Sejjil missiles, China’s DF-27 anti-ship ballistic missile and DF-17 hypersonic glide vehicle offer advanced mid-air maneuverability and sustained hypersonic speeds. With an estimated range of 8,000 kilometers, the DF-27 places U.S. naval installations at Pearl Harbor and Everett, Washington within striking distance—allowing China to threaten American assets without deploying a single ship. Strategic Implications According to Dr. Andrew Erickson of the US Naval War College, China is the first nation to operationalize an armed ICBM. These capabilities could cripple U.S. operational effectiveness across East Asia and complicate the defense of American interests in Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, and the Philippines in the event of armed conflict. Depleted Defenses Even as Patriot and THAAD struggle against less sophisticated Iranian missiles, Western analysts warn that a large-scale Chinese attack could overwhelm U.S. defenses by depleting interceptor inventories entirely. With THAAD replenishment not expected until April 2027, the fragility of current stockpiles is increasingly difficult to ignore. The Central Question If US air defenses are depleted in the Middle East after just over two weeks of fighting Iran, how will they withstand a Chinese arsenal that dwarfs Iran’s—particularly when the DF-27 can already reach American soil?$

🚨🇮🇷🇨🇳If America Can’t Handle Iranian Missiles, It’s Not Ready for China In just the first 16 days of war against Iran, the United States expended nearly 40% of its THAAD interceptors. If America’s most advanced air defenses are struggling against Iran—a regional power with a fraction of China’s capabilities—there is no plausible scenario in which the US is ready for a showdown with Beijing. The Chinese Arsenal The People’s Liberation Army operates the world’s largest missile inventory, backed by a rapid-action doctrine designed to dismantle U.S. bases and infrastructure in the early stages of conflict. Unlike Iran’s Kheibar Shikan and Sejjil missiles, China’s DF-27 anti-ship ballistic missile and DF-17 hypersonic glide vehicle offer advanced mid-air maneuverability and sustained hypersonic speeds. With an estimated range of 8,000 kilometers, the DF-27 places U.S. naval installations at Pearl Harbor and Everett, Washington within striking distance—allowing China to threaten American assets without deploying a single ship. Strategic Implications According to Dr. Andrew Erickson of the US Naval War College, China is the first nation to operationalize an armed ICBM. These capabilities could cripple U.S. operational effectiveness across East Asia and complicate the defense of American interests in Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, and the Philippines in the event of armed conflict. Depleted Defenses Even as Patriot and THAAD struggle against less sophisticated Iranian missiles, Western analysts warn that a large-scale Chinese attack could overwhelm U.S. defenses by depleting interceptor inventories entirely. With THAAD replenishment not expected until April 2027, the fragility of current stockpiles is increasingly difficult to ignore. The Central Question If US air defenses are depleted in the Middle East after just over two weeks of fighting Iran, how will they withstand a Chinese arsenal that dwarfs Iran’s—particularly when the DF-27 can already reach American soil?

NewRulesGeopolitics

137,298 views • 5 months ago

‼️🇻🇪 Venezuela is boosting its defenses with strong support from Russia and China. 🇺🇸 Despite these new moves, the United States remains the most advanced and battle tested military force in the world. Its global reach, unmatched technology, and powerful network of allies keep it firmly ahead of any challenge. Nations may posture, but the balance of real military strength still rests with the United States.

‼️🇻🇪 Venezuela is boosting its defenses with strong support from Russia and China. 🇺🇸 Despite these new moves, the United States remains the most advanced and battle tested military force in the world. Its global reach, unmatched technology, and powerful network of allies keep it firmly ahead of any challenge. Nations may posture, but the balance of real military strength still rests with the United States.

Defense Intelligence

83,099 views • 8 months ago

‼️🇹🇼🇺🇸🇨🇳 BIG | Taiwan is openly signaling that its military partnership with the United States is deeper than previously known. The move appears aimed at sending a clear message to Beijing that defense ties between Taipei and Washington continue to strengthen. According to The Wall Street Journal, Taiwan is increasingly speaking publicly about previously undisclosed U.S. military training programs, joint exercises, and exchange initiatives that have remained largely out of the spotlight until now. Defense Minister Wellington Koo said the cooperation with the United States is "much closer than you can imagine," emphasizing that the relationship extends far beyond American arms sales. According to Koo, Taiwan is not only receiving advanced military equipment from Washington but is also benefiting from practical combat experience and operational expertise shared by the U.S. military. The increasingly open discussion of these defense ties reflects a growing effort by Taipei to strengthen deterrence and demonstrate that U.S.-Taiwan military cooperation remains robust amid rising pressure from China. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

‼️🇹🇼🇺🇸🇨🇳 BIG | Taiwan is openly signaling that its military partnership with the United States is deeper than previously known. The move appears aimed at sending a clear message to Beijing that defense ties between Taipei and Washington continue to strengthen. According to The Wall Street Journal, Taiwan is increasingly speaking publicly about previously undisclosed U.S. military training programs, joint exercises, and exchange initiatives that have remained largely out of the spotlight until now. Defense Minister Wellington Koo said the cooperation with the United States is "much closer than you can imagine," emphasizing that the relationship extends far beyond American arms sales. According to Koo, Taiwan is not only receiving advanced military equipment from Washington but is also benefiting from practical combat experience and operational expertise shared by the U.S. military. The increasingly open discussion of these defense ties reflects a growing effort by Taipei to strengthen deterrence and demonstrate that U.S.-Taiwan military cooperation remains robust amid rising pressure from China. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

26,885 views • 26 days ago

‼️‼️🇺🇸🇮🇷 #BREAKING - According to U.S. officials speaking to Fox News, the United States is preparing a large-scale deployment of various military assets to the Middle East in the coming days and weeks, including the placement of additional air defense systems. This move is laying the groundwork for potential military options against Iran. One official emphasized that if President Donald Trump authorizes military action, it would be offensive in nature rather than purely defensive. Notably, the expected military buildup could match or even exceed the scale observed prior to the strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. At that time, there was a significant movement of aerial refueling tankers, C-17 transport aircraft, and the deployment of fighter squadrons to the region. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

‼️‼️🇺🇸🇮🇷 #BREAKING - According to U.S. officials speaking to Fox News, the United States is preparing a large-scale deployment of various military assets to the Middle East in the coming days and weeks, including the placement of additional air defense systems. This move is laying the groundwork for potential military options against Iran. One official emphasized that if President Donald Trump authorizes military action, it would be offensive in nature rather than purely defensive. Notably, the expected military buildup could match or even exceed the scale observed prior to the strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. At that time, there was a significant movement of aerial refueling tankers, C-17 transport aircraft, and the deployment of fighter squadrons to the region. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

155,538 views • 7 months ago

‼️🇨🇳🇷🇺🇺🇸China has surpassed Russia to become the world’s second largest operator of nuclear powered submarines. A 2026 assessment estimates China now fields around 32 active nuclear submarines, surpassing Russia’s 25 to 28 boats. The United States continues to dominate the undersea domain, holding the top position with approximately 71 nuclear powered submarines. The global balance beneath the oceans is shifting, and the strategic implications are growing fast.

‼️🇨🇳🇷🇺🇺🇸China has surpassed Russia to become the world’s second largest operator of nuclear powered submarines. A 2026 assessment estimates China now fields around 32 active nuclear submarines, surpassing Russia’s 25 to 28 boats. The United States continues to dominate the undersea domain, holding the top position with approximately 71 nuclear powered submarines. The global balance beneath the oceans is shifting, and the strategic implications are growing fast.

Defense Intelligence

31,412 views • 7 months ago

🇨🇳CHINA: TWO STATES FOR TWO PEOPLES MUST HAPPEN President Xi delivered at the China-Arab Cooperation Forum in Beijing: "People are suffering. War cannot go on forever. Justice must prevail sooner or later. The solution of two states for two peoples must not be allowed to waver. China firmly supports the establishment of new borders based on the 1967 borders. And the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with full sovereignty, with East Jerusalem as its capital. China supports Palestine's aspirations of becoming a full member of the United Nations." Source: Sputnik

🇨🇳CHINA: TWO STATES FOR TWO PEOPLES MUST HAPPEN President Xi delivered at the China-Arab Cooperation Forum in Beijing: "People are suffering. War cannot go on forever. Justice must prevail sooner or later. The solution of two states for two peoples must not be allowed to waver. China firmly supports the establishment of new borders based on the 1967 borders. And the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with full sovereignty, with East Jerusalem as its capital. China supports Palestine's aspirations of becoming a full member of the United Nations." Source: Sputnik

Mario Nawfal

556,033 views • 2 years ago

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 China's Decisive Home-Field Advantage Over the U.S. The Iran War demonstrated American military capability — but also revealed a critical vulnerability. Modern wars, even against weaker adversaries, burn through missiles at an extraordinary rate. But Iran and China are not remotely comparable. China has spent decades preparing specifically for a war against American naval power. Beijing would not rely on speedboats or mines. It would attempt a coordinated campaign designed to keep U.S. carrier strike groups far from the fight — and make intervention around Taiwan or the South China Sea costly from the opening hours of the war. 🔸 China's DF-21D "carrier killer" ballistic missile has an estimated range of 1,500 kilometers. 🔸 The longer-range DF-26 can reach much farther and threatens Guam — a critical U.S. logistics and air hub. 🔸 China would also fight with submarines, long-range bombers, drones, satellites, electronic warfare, and cyberattacks — feats Iran could not sustain. 🔸 Chinese aircraft, missile forces, and naval units would operate near home territory with shorter supply lines and land-based support. 🔸 U.S. forces would need to project power across long distances while protecting bases in Guam, Okinawa, and Japan — all of which could face missile attack in the opening phase of a war. 🔸 Logistics often decide wars. Between fuel, spare parts, runway repairs, and missile reloads, the winning side needs to perfect its ability to support its fighters and hardware at all times. The core issue is endurance. U.S. forces would be heavily dependent on scattered bases throughout the region, requiring fighter jets and bombers to travel long distances. China is built to fight close to home, while the U.S. must sustain power Meanwhile. Missile threats and logistics constraints would slow American response and strain its ability to maintain tempo. Without major adaptation, geography and preparation give Beijing a decisive edge in a prolonged conflict.

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 China's Decisive Home-Field Advantage Over the U.S. The Iran War demonstrated American military capability — but also revealed a critical vulnerability. Modern wars, even against weaker adversaries, burn through missiles at an extraordinary rate. But Iran and China are not remotely comparable. China has spent decades preparing specifically for a war against American naval power. Beijing would not rely on speedboats or mines. It would attempt a coordinated campaign designed to keep U.S. carrier strike groups far from the fight — and make intervention around Taiwan or the South China Sea costly from the opening hours of the war. 🔸 China's DF-21D "carrier killer" ballistic missile has an estimated range of 1,500 kilometers. 🔸 The longer-range DF-26 can reach much farther and threatens Guam — a critical U.S. logistics and air hub. 🔸 China would also fight with submarines, long-range bombers, drones, satellites, electronic warfare, and cyberattacks — feats Iran could not sustain. 🔸 Chinese aircraft, missile forces, and naval units would operate near home territory with shorter supply lines and land-based support. 🔸 U.S. forces would need to project power across long distances while protecting bases in Guam, Okinawa, and Japan — all of which could face missile attack in the opening phase of a war. 🔸 Logistics often decide wars. Between fuel, spare parts, runway repairs, and missile reloads, the winning side needs to perfect its ability to support its fighters and hardware at all times. The core issue is endurance. U.S. forces would be heavily dependent on scattered bases throughout the region, requiring fighter jets and bombers to travel long distances. China is built to fight close to home, while the U.S. must sustain power Meanwhile. Missile threats and logistics constraints would slow American response and strain its ability to maintain tempo. Without major adaptation, geography and preparation give Beijing a decisive edge in a prolonged conflict.

NewRulesGeopolitics

21,899 views • 4 months ago

🇹🇼🇨🇳⚠️ Taiwan has uncovered a serious security breach inside its military drone supply chain, with Chinese-made electronics allegedly concealed inside UAVs delivered directly to the Taiwanese Army. According to Taiwan News, prosecutors detained the head of one drone manufacturer and a technical officer from another company after an Army inspection found Chinese-made chips and flight-control boards inside training drones. Investigators allege that certificates of origin were falsified and Chinese markings on components were removed or concealed to bypass military procurement restrictions. The suspects are being investigated under Taiwan’s National Security Act and for attempted fraud. The case exposes precisely the vulnerability Taiwan is trying to eliminate as it rapidly expands its unmanned arsenal. Taipei wants a trusted, China-free drone supply chain because Chinese components inside military systems create potential cybersecurity, intelligence and wartime supply risks. With Taiwan planning to acquire hundreds of thousands of drones as part of its emerging “hellscape” deterrence strategy, ensuring that Beijing-linked technology cannot quietly penetrate those systems is becoming a national-security requirement, not merely a procurement issue.

🇹🇼🇨🇳⚠️ Taiwan has uncovered a serious security breach inside its military drone supply chain, with Chinese-made electronics allegedly concealed inside UAVs delivered directly to the Taiwanese Army. According to Taiwan News, prosecutors detained the head of one drone manufacturer and a technical officer from another company after an Army inspection found Chinese-made chips and flight-control boards inside training drones. Investigators allege that certificates of origin were falsified and Chinese markings on components were removed or concealed to bypass military procurement restrictions. The suspects are being investigated under Taiwan’s National Security Act and for attempted fraud. The case exposes precisely the vulnerability Taiwan is trying to eliminate as it rapidly expands its unmanned arsenal. Taipei wants a trusted, China-free drone supply chain because Chinese components inside military systems create potential cybersecurity, intelligence and wartime supply risks. With Taiwan planning to acquire hundreds of thousands of drones as part of its emerging “hellscape” deterrence strategy, ensuring that Beijing-linked technology cannot quietly penetrate those systems is becoming a national-security requirement, not merely a procurement issue.

NSTRIKE

94,311 views • 11 days ago

🇨🇳🇺🇸 BIG NEWS: China sends a clear message after Trump comments on Hormuz situation 🔥 🇺🇸 Trump says many countries are ready to support US Navy operations around the Strait of Hormuz 🇨🇳 China responds that it is not sending or planning any weapons to Iran and rejects all baseless accusations Beijing also warns against political pressure and says agreements with Tehran should not be interfered with Tensions rise as diplomatic sparring continues over the region 🔥

🇨🇳🇺🇸 BIG NEWS: China sends a clear message after Trump comments on Hormuz situation 🔥 🇺🇸 Trump says many countries are ready to support US Navy operations around the Strait of Hormuz 🇨🇳 China responds that it is not sending or planning any weapons to Iran and rejects all baseless accusations Beijing also warns against political pressure and says agreements with Tehran should not be interfered with Tensions rise as diplomatic sparring continues over the region 🔥

WAR

15,588 views • 4 months ago

‼️‼️🇷🇺☢️ BREAKING | Russian state television is once again normalizing nuclear blackmail, with propagandists openly discussing demonstrative nuclear use and even the possibility of escalating to a real strike against the United Kingdom if the West refuses to back down. During the discussion, one speaker argued that Russia should conduct an actual nuclear test to force the world to witness a visible demonstration of Kremlin power, while another went further and advocated demonstrative nuclear strikes as a means of coercion. The rhetoric then escalated to the suggestion that, if the West failed to respond, Russia should consider a direct nuclear attack on British territory. Expert Konstantin Simonov added that Russia would struggle in a conventional war against Europe because of its demographic, technological and economic disadvantages, and argued that nuclear coercion therefore remains Moscow’s most powerful instrument for forcing European states to disengage from the war. The significance is less about whether such threats are operational policy and more about how openly nuclear escalation is being mainstreamed inside Russia’s state-controlled information space. The message is designed to compensate for conventional weakness by convincing European societies that continued support for Ukraine carries unacceptable risk. In practice, this is nuclear intimidation as strategic messaging: if Moscow cannot dominate Europe conventionally, it wants fear of escalation to do the work instead. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

‼️‼️🇷🇺☢️ BREAKING | Russian state television is once again normalizing nuclear blackmail, with propagandists openly discussing demonstrative nuclear use and even the possibility of escalating to a real strike against the United Kingdom if the West refuses to back down. During the discussion, one speaker argued that Russia should conduct an actual nuclear test to force the world to witness a visible demonstration of Kremlin power, while another went further and advocated demonstrative nuclear strikes as a means of coercion. The rhetoric then escalated to the suggestion that, if the West failed to respond, Russia should consider a direct nuclear attack on British territory. Expert Konstantin Simonov added that Russia would struggle in a conventional war against Europe because of its demographic, technological and economic disadvantages, and argued that nuclear coercion therefore remains Moscow’s most powerful instrument for forcing European states to disengage from the war. The significance is less about whether such threats are operational policy and more about how openly nuclear escalation is being mainstreamed inside Russia’s state-controlled information space. The message is designed to compensate for conventional weakness by convincing European societies that continued support for Ukraine carries unacceptable risk. In practice, this is nuclear intimidation as strategic messaging: if Moscow cannot dominate Europe conventionally, it wants fear of escalation to do the work instead. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

20,292 views • 8 hours ago

🚨NEW EPISODE OF GOING UNDERGROUND⚡️ Trump-Xi Summit: ‘China🇨🇳 is WINNING the Competition Against the USA🇺🇸’—Prof. Zhang Weiwei How has China outsmarted the US's attempts to choke off Beijing's oil supplies via Iran & Venezuela? How does Beijing view the Trump Administration as it unleashes death and destruction across the global south? Why does China see itself as winning the competition against the United States? All this and more on this episode of Going Underground with Prof. Zhang Weiwei, Director of Fudan University’s China Institute and former Translator for Chinese Paramount Leader Deng Xiaoping.

🚨NEW EPISODE OF GOING UNDERGROUND⚡️ Trump-Xi Summit: ‘China🇨🇳 is WINNING the Competition Against the USA🇺🇸’—Prof. Zhang Weiwei How has China outsmarted the US's attempts to choke off Beijing's oil supplies via Iran & Venezuela? How does Beijing view the Trump Administration as it unleashes death and destruction across the global south? Why does China see itself as winning the competition against the United States? All this and more on this episode of Going Underground with Prof. Zhang Weiwei, Director of Fudan University’s China Institute and former Translator for Chinese Paramount Leader Deng Xiaoping.

Going Underground

206,807 views • 3 months ago

Recently, negotiations of different countries with Belarus have intensified. What is the significance of Belarus for different countries? ◾95% of China's land transit of goods go through Belarus (the land transit comprises 3% of all China's exports). ◾️The China-Belarus "Great Stone" Industrial park is the largest overseas industrial site of China. It was created with personal support and involvement of Lukashenko and Xi Jinping. The original plan was for it to become a gateway for Chinese goods into Europe and Russia. ◾️Lukashenko can also provide information on Russia for China. Belarus has logistical and geopolitical significance for China. The situation has become even more intense with Poland closing its borders with Belarus due to Zapad-2025 military training. ◾️Russia also makes use of Belarus' location to threaten Europe and NATO, first and foremost, with nuclear weapons. A large military base is being built in Belarus, allegedly, for the Oreshnik missile and/or nuclear weapons. ◾️The United States have relaunched direct contacts with Belarus, wishing to limit China's influence, as well as limit Russia's military presence, especially in the nuclear area. 📹: Lukashenko being greeted in Beijing in June

Recently, negotiations of different countries with Belarus have intensified. What is the significance of Belarus for different countries? ◾95% of China's land transit of goods go through Belarus (the land transit comprises 3% of all China's exports). ◾️The China-Belarus "Great Stone" Industrial park is the largest overseas industrial site of China. It was created with personal support and involvement of Lukashenko and Xi Jinping. The original plan was for it to become a gateway for Chinese goods into Europe and Russia. ◾️Lukashenko can also provide information on Russia for China. Belarus has logistical and geopolitical significance for China. The situation has become even more intense with Poland closing its borders with Belarus due to Zapad-2025 military training. ◾️Russia also makes use of Belarus' location to threaten Europe and NATO, first and foremost, with nuclear weapons. A large military base is being built in Belarus, allegedly, for the Oreshnik missile and/or nuclear weapons. ◾️The United States have relaunched direct contacts with Belarus, wishing to limit China's influence, as well as limit Russia's military presence, especially in the nuclear area. 📹: Lukashenko being greeted in Beijing in June

Anton Gerashchenko

381,333 views • 11 months ago

‼️‼️🇺🇸🇮🇷 BREAKING — At this moment, a U.S. Air Force C-17 “Globemaster” military transport aircraft is flying from Germany toward the Middle East. This movement likely indicates U.S. preparations for the potential launch of large-scale strikes against Iran. Accordingly, the United States has begun transporting munitions and other military equipment to its regional bases using heavy transport aircraft. See the latest updates with us: NSTRIKE

‼️‼️🇺🇸🇮🇷 BREAKING — At this moment, a U.S. Air Force C-17 “Globemaster” military transport aircraft is flying from Germany toward the Middle East. This movement likely indicates U.S. preparations for the potential launch of large-scale strikes against Iran. Accordingly, the United States has begun transporting munitions and other military equipment to its regional bases using heavy transport aircraft. See the latest updates with us: NSTRIKE

NSTRIKE

1,454,795 views • 7 months ago

🇷🇺☢️🇺🇦 Concern inside Russia’s own establishment over the possibility that Vladimir Putin could resort to a tactical nuclear weapon is reportedly growing, as the Kremlin searches for ways to change the trajectory of the war. According to Bloomberg, an increasing number of Russian officials and people familiar with discussions inside the Kremlin believe the possibility of Putin considering tactical nuclear use can no longer be completely dismissed. The concern reflects the enormous military and political stakes Moscow now faces in Ukraine and the growing uncertainty surrounding how far the Kremlin could escalate if conventional options fail to deliver its objectives. Russia’s key international partners are also deeply opposed to such a scenario. China and India have warned Moscow against nuclear escalation, with Beijing repeatedly communicating that Russia should not even consider employing nuclear weapons against Ukraine. China has continued publicly emphasizing its opposition to nuclear use and escalation. The political consequences for Moscow would be enormous. Crossing the nuclear threshold would risk destroying much of the diplomatic space Russia still retains with countries such as China and India, while radically escalating its confrontation with Ukraine and the West. That helps explain why pressure from Beijing and New Delhi matters: for Putin, nuclear escalation would not simply represent another military step, but potentially a fundamental rupture with partners Russia increasingly depends upon.

🇷🇺☢️🇺🇦 Concern inside Russia’s own establishment over the possibility that Vladimir Putin could resort to a tactical nuclear weapon is reportedly growing, as the Kremlin searches for ways to change the trajectory of the war. According to Bloomberg, an increasing number of Russian officials and people familiar with discussions inside the Kremlin believe the possibility of Putin considering tactical nuclear use can no longer be completely dismissed. The concern reflects the enormous military and political stakes Moscow now faces in Ukraine and the growing uncertainty surrounding how far the Kremlin could escalate if conventional options fail to deliver its objectives. Russia’s key international partners are also deeply opposed to such a scenario. China and India have warned Moscow against nuclear escalation, with Beijing repeatedly communicating that Russia should not even consider employing nuclear weapons against Ukraine. China has continued publicly emphasizing its opposition to nuclear use and escalation. The political consequences for Moscow would be enormous. Crossing the nuclear threshold would risk destroying much of the diplomatic space Russia still retains with countries such as China and India, while radically escalating its confrontation with Ukraine and the West. That helps explain why pressure from Beijing and New Delhi matters: for Putin, nuclear escalation would not simply represent another military step, but potentially a fundamental rupture with partners Russia increasingly depends upon.

NSTRIKE

56,879 views • 4 days ago