Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

China’s response to Trump’s election-interference accusations was almost contemptuously calm: fabricated accusations. no factual basis. no interest in interfering. stop dragging China into your elections. stop projecting your own habit of interfering in other countries’ internal affairs onto China. Trump has used this trick before. During COVID, he smeared... China, turned a public-health disaster into a “China virus” campaign, and used anti-China hysteria to bury America’s own catastrophic failure — over one million dead, and it was Beijing’s fault. Now he is doing it again. Polls collapsing. MAGA furious over another Middle East quagmire. Allies alienated by his tariff war. America’s global image losing to China. Domestic politics rotting from the inside. So what does he do? Blame China for American elections. Again. The funniest part is that even America’s most anti-China media are not buying it this time. The documents do not support his performance. The intelligence community did not even agree with his claims. The Atlantic basically called it paranoid nonsense. The New York Times openly noted that voter data cannot manipulate votes. At this point, China’s response was not even an explanation. It was boredom. Because a civilization does not need to audition in a clown’s campaign speech.show more

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

56,783 subscribers

18,014 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии Образование Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 AMERICA CANNOT STOP CHINA 🚨 Tarik Cyril Amar argues that Rubio’s claim that Washington does not want to contain China is a strategic deception. For years, the United States tried tariffs, chip restrictions, technological pressure, and economic warfare, not only to slow China down but to force it into backward development. But China defeated that strategy. Now Washington says China may rise, but “not at America’s expense.” The problem is that China’s rise is the natural outcome of a state investing in prosperity, industry, technology, and national development. And even if China stood still, America’s decline would still make China look stronger by comparison. But the American empire wants to blame China for a decline created by its own ruling class. .Tarik Cyril Amar .Syriana Analysis

🚨 AMERICA CANNOT STOP CHINA 🚨 Tarik Cyril Amar argues that Rubio’s claim that Washington does not want to contain China is a strategic deception. For years, the United States tried tariffs, chip restrictions, technological pressure, and economic warfare, not only to slow China down but to force it into backward development. But China defeated that strategy. Now Washington says China may rise, but “not at America’s expense.” The problem is that China’s rise is the natural outcome of a state investing in prosperity, industry, technology, and national development. And even if China stood still, America’s decline would still make China look stronger by comparison. But the American empire wants to blame China for a decline created by its own ruling class. .Tarik Cyril Amar .Syriana Analysis

Kevork Almassian

19,145 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Blinken finally said the quiet part out loud: The United States cannot defeat China alone. So his solution is not to outbuild, outproduce, or outcompete China. It is to assemble Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia into a larger anti-China bloc—then disguise containment as “alliance coordination.” That is the entire strategy: America alone is no longer strong enough, so Washington wants to weaponize everyone else’s anxieties. But here is the darkest joke. While Blinken dreams of mobilizing the world against China, global opinion is moving in the opposite direction. Pew polling now shows China viewed more positively than the United States across many countries. Even in Europe—America’s traditional alliance base—China’s favorability has risen above America’s. So Washington has a structural problem: It wants to lead an anti-China coalition at the exact moment more of the world trusts China than the country demanding that coalition. Blinken calls this “working with friends.” China calls it what it is: An empire that can no longer win alone asking its clients to supply the missing weight. America’s alliances were supposed to prove its leadership. Now they increasingly reveal its dependence. China is competing with the United States. The United States is recruiting the world to compensate for the fact that it cannot compete with China by itself. Yet the funniest meltdown did not come from American rednecks. It came from overseas Chinese opportunists who built their entire identity around hating China. Blinken merely admitted that America cannot defeat China alone, and they immediately accused him of being “brainwashed” and spreading “Chinese propaganda.” Their problem is not China. Their problem is that China’s rise has destroyed the psychological mechanism they depend on for survival: the belief that America must always stand above China—because without that hierarchy, their entire borrowed identity collapses.

Blinken finally said the quiet part out loud: The United States cannot defeat China alone. So his solution is not to outbuild, outproduce, or outcompete China. It is to assemble Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia into a larger anti-China bloc—then disguise containment as “alliance coordination.” That is the entire strategy: America alone is no longer strong enough, so Washington wants to weaponize everyone else’s anxieties. But here is the darkest joke. While Blinken dreams of mobilizing the world against China, global opinion is moving in the opposite direction. Pew polling now shows China viewed more positively than the United States across many countries. Even in Europe—America’s traditional alliance base—China’s favorability has risen above America’s. So Washington has a structural problem: It wants to lead an anti-China coalition at the exact moment more of the world trusts China than the country demanding that coalition. Blinken calls this “working with friends.” China calls it what it is: An empire that can no longer win alone asking its clients to supply the missing weight. America’s alliances were supposed to prove its leadership. Now they increasingly reveal its dependence. China is competing with the United States. The United States is recruiting the world to compensate for the fact that it cannot compete with China by itself. Yet the funniest meltdown did not come from American rednecks. It came from overseas Chinese opportunists who built their entire identity around hating China. Blinken merely admitted that America cannot defeat China alone, and they immediately accused him of being “brainwashed” and spreading “Chinese propaganda.” Their problem is not China. Their problem is that China’s rise has destroyed the psychological mechanism they depend on for survival: the belief that America must always stand above China—because without that hierarchy, their entire borrowed identity collapses.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

41,767 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

China’s Foreign Ministry responded coldly to Trump’s threats: China opposes unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law or authorization from the UN Security Council. In other words: China is not South Korea, Japan, or a pack of NATO clients trained to bark on command. Washington has spent years confusing its own coercive toolkit with global consensus, only to discover that most of the world has no interest in setting its economy on fire just to satisfy American geopolitical theater. Russia did not collapse the way they fantasized. And China is not Russia. China’s economic scale, industrial depth, trade networks, and strategic resilience are in a completely different category. Trump already lost this fight twice. Now the more Washington threatens, the more it pushes China to decouple on its own terms. This is the real source of American hysteria: it cannot win fairly, it cannot compel obedience indefinitely, and it cannot force a sovereign China to kneel. That is why the tantrums keep escalating. Because China is too large to bully, too industrialized to strangle, and too sovereign to kneel.

China’s Foreign Ministry responded coldly to Trump’s threats: China opposes unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law or authorization from the UN Security Council. In other words: China is not South Korea, Japan, or a pack of NATO clients trained to bark on command. Washington has spent years confusing its own coercive toolkit with global consensus, only to discover that most of the world has no interest in setting its economy on fire just to satisfy American geopolitical theater. Russia did not collapse the way they fantasized. And China is not Russia. China’s economic scale, industrial depth, trade networks, and strategic resilience are in a completely different category. Trump already lost this fight twice. Now the more Washington threatens, the more it pushes China to decouple on its own terms. This is the real source of American hysteria: it cannot win fairly, it cannot compel obedience indefinitely, and it cannot force a sovereign China to kneel. That is why the tantrums keep escalating. Because China is too large to bully, too industrialized to strangle, and too sovereign to kneel.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

33,808 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

When the Chinese Foreign Ministry was asked about Germany summoning the Chinese ambassador over media reports claiming China had trained Russian soldiers, its answer was blunt: the reports have no factual basis and are purely slanderous. Translation: China has no obligation to respond to every instance of German hysteria. China is not responsible for Europe’s habit of turning every insecurity into an accusation against Beijing. The funny part is that Germany has spent years destroying its own energy security, industrial competitiveness, and strategic autonomy over Ukraine. Now it wants to drag China into the psychological wreckage. But China refuses to follow the Western gaslighting script. If Germany wants to believe every anti-China rumor it reads, that is Germany’s problem. China is not a pacifier for Europe’s overgrown children.

When the Chinese Foreign Ministry was asked about Germany summoning the Chinese ambassador over media reports claiming China had trained Russian soldiers, its answer was blunt: the reports have no factual basis and are purely slanderous. Translation: China has no obligation to respond to every instance of German hysteria. China is not responsible for Europe’s habit of turning every insecurity into an accusation against Beijing. The funny part is that Germany has spent years destroying its own energy security, industrial competitiveness, and strategic autonomy over Ukraine. Now it wants to drag China into the psychological wreckage. But China refuses to follow the Western gaslighting script. If Germany wants to believe every anti-China rumor it reads, that is Germany’s problem. China is not a pacifier for Europe’s overgrown children.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

53,545 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

“We threaten no one.” China’s reply to NATO’s accusations over normal Beijing-Moscow cooperation was simple. And it exposed the absurdity perfectly. A bloc that spent decades turning “defense” into invasions, bombings, regime change, occupation, and mass killing now calls China a “security concern.” China did not invade Europe. China did not bomb NATO. China did not loot European palaces, burn their gardens, or steal their civilizational treasures. Europe did that to China. Before NATO lectures Beijing, this North Atlantic bombing club should explain why it is crawling into the Asia-Pacific like a colonial ghost with new branding.

“We threaten no one.” China’s reply to NATO’s accusations over normal Beijing-Moscow cooperation was simple. And it exposed the absurdity perfectly. A bloc that spent decades turning “defense” into invasions, bombings, regime change, occupation, and mass killing now calls China a “security concern.” China did not invade Europe. China did not bomb NATO. China did not loot European palaces, burn their gardens, or steal their civilizational treasures. Europe did that to China. Before NATO lectures Beijing, this North Atlantic bombing club should explain why it is crawling into the Asia-Pacific like a colonial ghost with new branding.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

16,991 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

High-end carbon fiber used to be one of the classic chokehold materials used against China. Japan dominated it. The West controlled it. China was expected to buy what it was allowed to buy and stay dependent where it mattered. But sanctions and blockades have a funny habit. They do not always stop China. Sometimes they teach China exactly what it must master. Now Chinese-made carbon fiber can pull a 10-ton truck with one strand, enter aerospace materials, high-end manufacturing, sports equipment, and strategic industries. This is the pattern again: They tried to keep China at the low end. China climbed into the material layer itself. Black gold is not just carbon fiber. It is another chokehold turning into domestic capability.

High-end carbon fiber used to be one of the classic chokehold materials used against China. Japan dominated it. The West controlled it. China was expected to buy what it was allowed to buy and stay dependent where it mattered. But sanctions and blockades have a funny habit. They do not always stop China. Sometimes they teach China exactly what it must master. Now Chinese-made carbon fiber can pull a 10-ton truck with one strand, enter aerospace materials, high-end manufacturing, sports equipment, and strategic industries. This is the pattern again: They tried to keep China at the low end. China climbed into the material layer itself. Black gold is not just carbon fiber. It is another chokehold turning into domestic capability.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

14,782 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Mearsheimer is honest about power. He dares to say the quiet part of Western politics out loud: international relations are not a fairy tale of “good guys” and “bad guys”, but a naked struggle for survival, security, and dominance. That is why, to him, there is no moral distinction between America and China. But he still misunderstands China. His offensive realism has one fixed Western code: • A great power must seek regional hegemony. • A great power must push others into dependence. • A great power must turn its neighborhood into a Monroe Doctrine. So when he sees China rise, he assumes China must want to become America in Asia. That is where he gets China wrong. America’s strategy is exclusion. It cannot tolerate another strong power in its own hemisphere. That is why Cuba, Venezuela, and any independent force in Latin America become permanent targets. China’s strategy is not a Chinese Monroe Doctrine. China’s priority is stability around itself, because China’s own development requires peace, trade, logistics, markets, energy routes, and regional order. But stability does not mean turning neighbors into colonies. It does not mean hundreds of military bases. It does not mean color revolutions, proxy wars, sanctions, coups, and permanent ideological containment. China spent forty years building roads, ports, factories, power grids, railways, supply chains, and markets. America exported war. China exported infrastructure. America’s model is control. China’s model is connectivity. That is why Western realists often misread China. They assume interest maximization must mean domination. They assume security must mean exclusion. They assume strength must become hegemony. But China’s civilizational instinct is different. China does not need every country to become Chinese. It does not need every neighbor to become a satellite. It does not need to export ideology, stage revolutions, or install puppet regimes. China’s highest security is not ruling everyone around it. It is building a region where trade, development, and interdependence make war too expensive and chaos too stupid. Mearsheimer is right that great powers compete. But he is wrong to assume every great power dreams in American grammar. China does not want to become America in Asia. China wants Asia to stop being America’s battlefield.

Mearsheimer is honest about power. He dares to say the quiet part of Western politics out loud: international relations are not a fairy tale of “good guys” and “bad guys”, but a naked struggle for survival, security, and dominance. That is why, to him, there is no moral distinction between America and China. But he still misunderstands China. His offensive realism has one fixed Western code: • A great power must seek regional hegemony. • A great power must push others into dependence. • A great power must turn its neighborhood into a Monroe Doctrine. So when he sees China rise, he assumes China must want to become America in Asia. That is where he gets China wrong. America’s strategy is exclusion. It cannot tolerate another strong power in its own hemisphere. That is why Cuba, Venezuela, and any independent force in Latin America become permanent targets. China’s strategy is not a Chinese Monroe Doctrine. China’s priority is stability around itself, because China’s own development requires peace, trade, logistics, markets, energy routes, and regional order. But stability does not mean turning neighbors into colonies. It does not mean hundreds of military bases. It does not mean color revolutions, proxy wars, sanctions, coups, and permanent ideological containment. China spent forty years building roads, ports, factories, power grids, railways, supply chains, and markets. America exported war. China exported infrastructure. America’s model is control. China’s model is connectivity. That is why Western realists often misread China. They assume interest maximization must mean domination. They assume security must mean exclusion. They assume strength must become hegemony. But China’s civilizational instinct is different. China does not need every country to become Chinese. It does not need every neighbor to become a satellite. It does not need to export ideology, stage revolutions, or install puppet regimes. China’s highest security is not ruling everyone around it. It is building a region where trade, development, and interdependence make war too expensive and chaos too stupid. Mearsheimer is right that great powers compete. But he is wrong to assume every great power dreams in American grammar. China does not want to become America in Asia. China wants Asia to stop being America’s battlefield.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

14,030 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The most brutal part is not that China is using AI to sort garbage. It is that China has pushed waste management so far that the old problem has reversed. China used to worry about having too much garbage to process. Now some waste-to-energy plants are facing the opposite problem: not enough garbage. Previously sealed landfills may even have to be reopened, not because China failed, but because waste has become fuel, feedstock, data, and part of an industrial recycling loop. This is what China does best. It takes the ugliest, dirtiest, most ignored corner of urban life — garbage — and turns it into engineering, automation, energy recovery, environmental governance, and industrial optimization. Even trash gets absorbed into the machine. In many countries, garbage is where governance collapses. In China, even garbage becomes a system.

The most brutal part is not that China is using AI to sort garbage. It is that China has pushed waste management so far that the old problem has reversed. China used to worry about having too much garbage to process. Now some waste-to-energy plants are facing the opposite problem: not enough garbage. Previously sealed landfills may even have to be reopened, not because China failed, but because waste has become fuel, feedstock, data, and part of an industrial recycling loop. This is what China does best. It takes the ugliest, dirtiest, most ignored corner of urban life — garbage — and turns it into engineering, automation, energy recovery, environmental governance, and industrial optimization. Even trash gets absorbed into the machine. In many countries, garbage is where governance collapses. In China, even garbage becomes a system.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

458,889 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Indian media pressed Beijing for details about the “actual cause” of the China-Nepal mudslide disaster and whether Indian tourists had been rescued. Think about that. India’s anti-China propaganda trolls have been relentlessly spreading rumors and slandering China since the disaster began. Now Indian media are asking Beijing whether Indian tourists have been rescued. A glacier collapsed in Nepal. The disaster surged into China. Chinese rescue workers risked their lives searching for both their own citizens and foreign tourists. And even then, India’s anti-China propaganda apparatus kept manufacturing lies and smearing China. Not even after learning that more than 130 of the missing tourists were Indians could they stop. That is what makes this disaster so revealing. One side sent soldiers, engineers and rescue teams into the mud. The other side had propagandists manufacturing anti-China fantasies before their own missing compatriots had even been accounted for. The contrast is not just technological or institutional. It is educational. It is civic. It is moral. And yes, much of this hostility toward China is driven by resentment of a reality they cannot stand: China has outperformed India in industrial capacity, infrastructure, technology, state capacity and disaster response — and no amount of anti-China hysteria can erase that gap. When envy becomes propaganda, and propaganda survives even your own people’s suffering, what remains is not patriotism. It is moral decay wearing nationalism as a costume.

Indian media pressed Beijing for details about the “actual cause” of the China-Nepal mudslide disaster and whether Indian tourists had been rescued. Think about that. India’s anti-China propaganda trolls have been relentlessly spreading rumors and slandering China since the disaster began. Now Indian media are asking Beijing whether Indian tourists have been rescued. A glacier collapsed in Nepal. The disaster surged into China. Chinese rescue workers risked their lives searching for both their own citizens and foreign tourists. And even then, India’s anti-China propaganda apparatus kept manufacturing lies and smearing China. Not even after learning that more than 130 of the missing tourists were Indians could they stop. That is what makes this disaster so revealing. One side sent soldiers, engineers and rescue teams into the mud. The other side had propagandists manufacturing anti-China fantasies before their own missing compatriots had even been accounted for. The contrast is not just technological or institutional. It is educational. It is civic. It is moral. And yes, much of this hostility toward China is driven by resentment of a reality they cannot stand: China has outperformed India in industrial capacity, infrastructure, technology, state capacity and disaster response — and no amount of anti-China hysteria can erase that gap. When envy becomes propaganda, and propaganda survives even your own people’s suffering, what remains is not patriotism. It is moral decay wearing nationalism as a costume.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

274,126 просмотров • 4 дней назад

Bessent just admitted the quiet part: everyone else is afraid of U.S. sanctions, but China kept buying Iranian oil. That is what real support looks like. Not hashtags. Not empty “rules-based order” sermons. Not performative outrage from anti-China colonial pets. When Trump bombed Iran, blocked Hormuz, and tried to choke Tehran economically, they laughed and said China had lost its cheap oil. Then they mocked China for “not helping Iran.” But helping a country does not always mean sending troops. Sometimes it means keeping its economy breathing when Washington tries to suffocate it. China’s demand, industry, and payment networks gave Iran enough room to survive the pressure until America could no longer drag out a war it could not afford. And then Washington had to sign a ceasefire so humiliating that even MAGA called it surrender. China did not need to fire a missile. It bought oil. It kept trade alive. That is why sanctions did not become a death sentence. That is why empire hates China: because China does not ask permission to keep another country standing.

Bessent just admitted the quiet part: everyone else is afraid of U.S. sanctions, but China kept buying Iranian oil. That is what real support looks like. Not hashtags. Not empty “rules-based order” sermons. Not performative outrage from anti-China colonial pets. When Trump bombed Iran, blocked Hormuz, and tried to choke Tehran economically, they laughed and said China had lost its cheap oil. Then they mocked China for “not helping Iran.” But helping a country does not always mean sending troops. Sometimes it means keeping its economy breathing when Washington tries to suffocate it. China’s demand, industry, and payment networks gave Iran enough room to survive the pressure until America could no longer drag out a war it could not afford. And then Washington had to sign a ceasefire so humiliating that even MAGA called it surrender. China did not need to fire a missile. It bought oil. It kept trade alive. That is why sanctions did not become a death sentence. That is why empire hates China: because China does not ask permission to keep another country standing.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

11,546 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

China’s Southern Theater Command did not just say it “warned” and “tracked” the Dutch frigate. It used a much rarer phrase: “warning electronic interference.” Translation: We are no longer just shouting through a loudspeaker. We are touching your systems. The Dutch frigate De Ruyter and its shipborne helicopter did not simply “pass through.” It illegally entered waters near the Xisha Islands, while its helicopter repeatedly intruded into Chinese territorial airspace. And China responded with electronic pressure. Radar. Communications. Sensors. Data links. This is where modern naval confrontation begins. Not with a missile. Not with a cannon shot. But with the loss of electromagnetic control. Europe’s little naval cosplay in the South China Sea is becoming increasingly pathetic. The Netherlands thought it was showing presence. Instead, it received a lesson: The South China Sea is not a stage for declining colonial powers to perform relevance. China sees you. China tracks you. And now China is openly telling you it can interfere with you. Not wanting war does not mean China is afraid of war. It means China is giving you one last chance to leave before your expensive toys become useless metal.

China’s Southern Theater Command did not just say it “warned” and “tracked” the Dutch frigate. It used a much rarer phrase: “warning electronic interference.” Translation: We are no longer just shouting through a loudspeaker. We are touching your systems. The Dutch frigate De Ruyter and its shipborne helicopter did not simply “pass through.” It illegally entered waters near the Xisha Islands, while its helicopter repeatedly intruded into Chinese territorial airspace. And China responded with electronic pressure. Radar. Communications. Sensors. Data links. This is where modern naval confrontation begins. Not with a missile. Not with a cannon shot. But with the loss of electromagnetic control. Europe’s little naval cosplay in the South China Sea is becoming increasingly pathetic. The Netherlands thought it was showing presence. Instead, it received a lesson: The South China Sea is not a stage for declining colonial powers to perform relevance. China sees you. China tracks you. And now China is openly telling you it can interfere with you. Not wanting war does not mean China is afraid of war. It means China is giving you one last chance to leave before your expensive toys become useless metal.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

33,294 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Jensen Huang says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei Nvidia was not rejected because China “hates” Nvidia. It was pushed out because Washington turned chips into a leash. China learned the lesson very clearly: You cannot build AI sovereignty on hardware that your geopolitical rival can revoke with one export-control memo. Jensen Huang can be friendly. Nvidia can be excellent. Chinese demand can be huge. None of that changes the strategic reality. If the neck of China’s AI industry depends on an American-controlled chip supply, then it is not an industry. It is a hostage. So China did what any serious civilization-state would do: It built alternatives. It endured the pain. It let Huawei grow into the space Washington forced open. Now Nvidia says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei. That is not China closing a door. That is America sawing off the bridge, then acting surprised when China built its own road.

Jensen Huang says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei Nvidia was not rejected because China “hates” Nvidia. It was pushed out because Washington turned chips into a leash. China learned the lesson very clearly: You cannot build AI sovereignty on hardware that your geopolitical rival can revoke with one export-control memo. Jensen Huang can be friendly. Nvidia can be excellent. Chinese demand can be huge. None of that changes the strategic reality. If the neck of China’s AI industry depends on an American-controlled chip supply, then it is not an industry. It is a hostage. So China did what any serious civilization-state would do: It built alternatives. It endured the pain. It let Huawei grow into the space Washington forced open. Now Nvidia says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei. That is not China closing a door. That is America sawing off the bridge, then acting surprised when China built its own road.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

235,707 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The funniest part of JD Vance’s speech is the ending: “I am angry about the rise of China… but I am most angry that American leadership let it happen.” Let it happen? As if China’s rise was an American clerical error. As if 1.4 billion people industrialized because Washington forgot to lock the door. China was sanctioned, contained, smeared, tariffed, and technologically strangled. And still it became the world’s strongest industrial economy. India had the population. India had English. India had earlier access to the WTO. India had Western approval, “democracy” branding, and decades of geopolitical courtship. Capital still chose China. Factories still chose China. Supply chains still chose China. Why? Because civilization is not built by flattering Washington. It is built by infrastructure, discipline, engineers, workers, logistics, electricity, education, and state capacity. America’s next ten years are not about competing with China. That phase is already over. America is now competing with India for who can disappoint capital less. China’s real opponent was never America. China’s real opponent is its own execution, its own discipline, its own ability to keep building without believing Western noise. Vance is angry because China rose. But what really humiliates him is this: America tried to stop it. And China rose anyway.

The funniest part of JD Vance’s speech is the ending: “I am angry about the rise of China… but I am most angry that American leadership let it happen.” Let it happen? As if China’s rise was an American clerical error. As if 1.4 billion people industrialized because Washington forgot to lock the door. China was sanctioned, contained, smeared, tariffed, and technologically strangled. And still it became the world’s strongest industrial economy. India had the population. India had English. India had earlier access to the WTO. India had Western approval, “democracy” branding, and decades of geopolitical courtship. Capital still chose China. Factories still chose China. Supply chains still chose China. Why? Because civilization is not built by flattering Washington. It is built by infrastructure, discipline, engineers, workers, logistics, electricity, education, and state capacity. America’s next ten years are not about competing with China. That phase is already over. America is now competing with India for who can disappoint capital less. China’s real opponent was never America. China’s real opponent is its own execution, its own discipline, its own ability to keep building without believing Western noise. Vance is angry because China rose. But what really humiliates him is this: America tried to stop it. And China rose anyway.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

472,704 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The last time Trump initiated a trade war against China, Covid-19 was purposely released from a lab in Wuhan, derailing his tariff plan and costing him the election. Now Trump is placing 104% tariffs on China in a position of extreme power and Fauci is simultaneously telling media that a new Covid virus 'might' be coming. Coincidence? The Timeline: August 2019: Trump claims he is the chosen one called to take on China on trade. He is winning handily. December 2019: China purposely released Covid-19 from the Wuhan lab. Anthony Fauci was directly connected to the Wuhan lab. The mainstream media uses every trick in the book to stop Donald Trump at nearly every turn. They made Fauci seem like a saint when he was the one who had literally helped create the pandemic. Aprile 2025: Anthony Fauci claims that there will likely be a new Covid virus right as Trump begins his tariff war that specifically targets China. Would the deep state attempt to release another virus or pandemic in response to Trump's bold and powerful strategy to finally make America great again and stop the decline?

The last time Trump initiated a trade war against China, Covid-19 was purposely released from a lab in Wuhan, derailing his tariff plan and costing him the election. Now Trump is placing 104% tariffs on China in a position of extreme power and Fauci is simultaneously telling media that a new Covid virus 'might' be coming. Coincidence? The Timeline: August 2019: Trump claims he is the chosen one called to take on China on trade. He is winning handily. December 2019: China purposely released Covid-19 from the Wuhan lab. Anthony Fauci was directly connected to the Wuhan lab. The mainstream media uses every trick in the book to stop Donald Trump at nearly every turn. They made Fauci seem like a saint when he was the one who had literally helped create the pandemic. Aprile 2025: Anthony Fauci claims that there will likely be a new Covid virus right as Trump begins his tariff war that specifically targets China. Would the deep state attempt to release another virus or pandemic in response to Trump's bold and powerful strategy to finally make America great again and stop the decline?

Green Lives Matter

535,507 просмотров • 1 год назад

China is not what you think it is. China was created by America. In 1971 Nixon removed the dollar from the gold standard. The dollar was now worth nothing. So he needed to create demand for it. Two new hallucinations. The petrodollar — oil only sold in US dollars. And China — the world's factory, paid in US dollars. China didn't rise because of communism. China didn't rise because of hard work. China rose because America needed somewhere to park its dollars. China is a hallucination of a hallucination. And here is the problem with that. If the original hallucination becomes unstable — China becomes twice as unstable. Because it has nothing real to stand on. That is why China and America will always need each other. The dream only works if both keep dreaming it.

China is not what you think it is. China was created by America. In 1971 Nixon removed the dollar from the gold standard. The dollar was now worth nothing. So he needed to create demand for it. Two new hallucinations. The petrodollar — oil only sold in US dollars. And China — the world's factory, paid in US dollars. China didn't rise because of communism. China didn't rise because of hard work. China rose because America needed somewhere to park its dollars. China is a hallucination of a hallucination. And here is the problem with that. If the original hallucination becomes unstable — China becomes twice as unstable. Because it has nothing real to stand on. That is why China and America will always need each other. The dream only works if both keep dreaming it.

Predictive History

24,046 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

SpaceX was supposed to be America’s sacred crown jewel. The symbol of American innovation. The proof that only the U.S. could define the future of reusable rockets. The technological altar where Silicon Valley, Wall Street, and Washington all worshipped together. And now China has successfully completed its first controlled recovery of an orbital-class rocket booster with the Long March 10B. Not by copying the American landing-pad model. Not by repeating SpaceX’s path. China used a sea-based net-capture system — a different technical route, a Chinese solution, built for its own launch architecture. That is why this matters. China is not just entering reusable rocketry. China is entering it with its own method. For years, the West comforted itself with one myth: China can manufacture, but America still owns the frontier. EVs broke that myth. Solar broke that myth. Shipbuilding broke that myth. AI began breaking that myth. Now reusable rockets are breaking it too. SpaceX may still ahead. But the crown is no longer untouchable. China did not need permission to reach orbit. China did not need applause to recover the booster. It just built, tested, failed, learned, and came back. Again.

SpaceX was supposed to be America’s sacred crown jewel. The symbol of American innovation. The proof that only the U.S. could define the future of reusable rockets. The technological altar where Silicon Valley, Wall Street, and Washington all worshipped together. And now China has successfully completed its first controlled recovery of an orbital-class rocket booster with the Long March 10B. Not by copying the American landing-pad model. Not by repeating SpaceX’s path. China used a sea-based net-capture system — a different technical route, a Chinese solution, built for its own launch architecture. That is why this matters. China is not just entering reusable rocketry. China is entering it with its own method. For years, the West comforted itself with one myth: China can manufacture, but America still owns the frontier. EVs broke that myth. Solar broke that myth. Shipbuilding broke that myth. AI began breaking that myth. Now reusable rockets are breaking it too. SpaceX may still ahead. But the crown is no longer untouchable. China did not need permission to reach orbit. China did not need applause to recover the booster. It just built, tested, failed, learned, and came back. Again.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

60,822 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

China is planning to spend around 2 trillion yuan ($295 billion) over the next five years to build data centers across the country At least 80% of all AI chips must come from domestic suppliers, primarily Huawei. Nvidia and AMD are locked out by design. Nvidia once held a 95% market share in China's AI market. Now? Zero. America did not lose China’s AI chip market because China “closed its doors,” but because America chose to weaponize chips, sanctions, export controls, entity lists, national security hysteria, and technological apartheid against its own largest customer. Washington took the world’s largest chip consumption market — a market that could have funded American semiconductor dominance for another generation — and taught it the most important lesson: Never let your future depend on a supplier that can be turned off by one paranoid empire. So China did what any serious civilization-state would do. It localized. It substituted. It built its own stack. It turned a customer relationship into a sovereignty project. And the same people who tried to choke Huawei are watching Huawei become the backbone of China’s AI infrastructure. This is a textbook own goal. America thought it was denying China the future. In reality, it compelled China to architect the future beyond America.

China is planning to spend around 2 trillion yuan ($295 billion) over the next five years to build data centers across the country At least 80% of all AI chips must come from domestic suppliers, primarily Huawei. Nvidia and AMD are locked out by design. Nvidia once held a 95% market share in China's AI market. Now? Zero. America did not lose China’s AI chip market because China “closed its doors,” but because America chose to weaponize chips, sanctions, export controls, entity lists, national security hysteria, and technological apartheid against its own largest customer. Washington took the world’s largest chip consumption market — a market that could have funded American semiconductor dominance for another generation — and taught it the most important lesson: Never let your future depend on a supplier that can be turned off by one paranoid empire. So China did what any serious civilization-state would do. It localized. It substituted. It built its own stack. It turned a customer relationship into a sovereignty project. And the same people who tried to choke Huawei are watching Huawei become the backbone of China’s AI infrastructure. This is a textbook own goal. America thought it was denying China the future. In reality, it compelled China to architect the future beyond America.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

36,839 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

For five thousand years, China has understood one simple truth: history is not a toy. It cannot be bent for politics, edited for convenience, or erased for someone else’s narrative. That’s why, the moment Trump launched “Trade War 2.0” in his second term and began spreading blatant lies about COVID-19, China stopped giving him diplomatic courtesy. A civilization that survived dynasties, invasions, famine, plague, and rebirth does not need to tolerate the delusions of a man who thinks history begins with his tweets. China remembers 2020 clearly. China documented every case, every death, every hospital bed that overflowed. And years from now, when people look back at the pandemic, they will find something striking: China kept the most complete records. Others kept the most convenient ones. This is exactly why Beijing refuses to let Trump rewrite the past, refuses to let Western media manufacture “alternative timelines,” and refuses to let Japan whitewash its history of aggression. A nation that writes its own history — in its own hand, word by word — does not outsource truth. So when the Foreign Ministry calls out lies today, it isn’t just diplomacy. It is civilizational self-defense. It is the insistence that memory cannot be colonized. China will not allow slander to replace fact. China will not allow forgetting to replace evidence. China will not allow those who failed their own people to lecture the world about pandemics. A civilization that knows its past refuses to let others falsify it.

For five thousand years, China has understood one simple truth: history is not a toy. It cannot be bent for politics, edited for convenience, or erased for someone else’s narrative. That’s why, the moment Trump launched “Trade War 2.0” in his second term and began spreading blatant lies about COVID-19, China stopped giving him diplomatic courtesy. A civilization that survived dynasties, invasions, famine, plague, and rebirth does not need to tolerate the delusions of a man who thinks history begins with his tweets. China remembers 2020 clearly. China documented every case, every death, every hospital bed that overflowed. And years from now, when people look back at the pandemic, they will find something striking: China kept the most complete records. Others kept the most convenient ones. This is exactly why Beijing refuses to let Trump rewrite the past, refuses to let Western media manufacture “alternative timelines,” and refuses to let Japan whitewash its history of aggression. A nation that writes its own history — in its own hand, word by word — does not outsource truth. So when the Foreign Ministry calls out lies today, it isn’t just diplomacy. It is civilizational self-defense. It is the insistence that memory cannot be colonized. China will not allow slander to replace fact. China will not allow forgetting to replace evidence. China will not allow those who failed their own people to lecture the world about pandemics. A civilization that knows its past refuses to let others falsify it.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

26,200 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

China’s response to the angry protests from Japan, Australia and New Zealand was ice-cold: We notified you before the launch. We told you it was routine annual military training. We told you it was consistent with international law and customary international practice. We told you it was not directed at any specific country or target. The process was safe, standard, and professional. And still Japan, Australia and New Zealand went into hysteria. Why? If the test was not aimed at you, why are you panicking so loudly? Maybe the problem is not the missile. Maybe the problem is what you have been doing around China. Sending warships through the Taiwan Strait. Militarizing China’s doorstep. Dragging outside powers into the South China Sea. Turning every Chinese defensive capability into a regional “threat.” You provoked. China demonstrated. You tested red lines. China showed capability. And now you want China to stop because you feel uncomfortable? Who are you? China is not asking for your permission to conduct lawful military training in international waters. If you are so nervous about a publicly notified, legally compliant, non-targeted exercise, maybe you should ask yourself what guilty conscience is making you tremble. You do not oppose escalation. You just oppose consequences.

China’s response to the angry protests from Japan, Australia and New Zealand was ice-cold: We notified you before the launch. We told you it was routine annual military training. We told you it was consistent with international law and customary international practice. We told you it was not directed at any specific country or target. The process was safe, standard, and professional. And still Japan, Australia and New Zealand went into hysteria. Why? If the test was not aimed at you, why are you panicking so loudly? Maybe the problem is not the missile. Maybe the problem is what you have been doing around China. Sending warships through the Taiwan Strait. Militarizing China’s doorstep. Dragging outside powers into the South China Sea. Turning every Chinese defensive capability into a regional “threat.” You provoked. China demonstrated. You tested red lines. China showed capability. And now you want China to stop because you feel uncomfortable? Who are you? China is not asking for your permission to conduct lawful military training in international waters. If you are so nervous about a publicly notified, legally compliant, non-targeted exercise, maybe you should ask yourself what guilty conscience is making you tremble. You do not oppose escalation. You just oppose consequences.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

140,068 просмотров • 1 месяц назад