Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Chip War Author Chris Miller says China's spending on chips and data centers doesn't reflect the same sense of urgency around AGI seen in the U.S. In response, John Coogan asks whether China is actually behind or simply operating on a much longer timeline. Chris: The puzzle is why...

tbpn's profile picture

TBPN

1,022,242 subscribers

33,706 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🇨🇳🇺🇸 TREASURY SECRETARY BESSENT: “THIS IS CHINA VERSUS THE WORLD - NOT JUST A U.S.-CHINA PROBLEM” “We have things that are more powerful than the rarer export controls that the Chinese want to put on. And to be clear, this is China versus the world. It's not a U.S.-China problem. Good news is that this is IMF week. A lot of my counterparts, or all my counterparts, are here. We're going to be speaking with our European allies, with Australia, with Canada, with India, and the Asian democracies. And we're going to have a fulsome group response to this because bureaucrats in China cannot manage the supply chain or the manufacturing process for the rest of the world. We don't want to damage their economy. We don't believe that they want to damage ours." Source: Rapid Response 47
1:21

🇨🇳🇺🇸 TREASURY SECRETARY BESSENT: “THIS IS CHINA VERSUS THE WORLD - NOT JUST A U.S.-CHINA PROBLEM” “We have things that are more powerful than the rarer export controls that the Chinese want to put on. And to be clear, this is China versus the world. It's not a U.S.-China problem. Good news is that this is IMF week. A lot of my counterparts, or all my counterparts, are here. We're going to be speaking with our European allies, with Australia, with Canada, with India, and the Asian democracies. And we're going to have a fulsome group response to this because bureaucrats in China cannot manage the supply chain or the manufacturing process for the rest of the world. We don't want to damage their economy. We don't believe that they want to damage ours." Source: Rapid Response 47

Mario Nawfal

319,810 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Elon Musk explains how data centers in Space could help the US compete with China in AI “Given that Chinese AI companies are doing as well as they are with a relatively small amount of compute, it seems that if they had a lot of compute, there’s a good chance they would be the leaders. The constraints on AI are essentially electricity and AI chips. China is very strong in digital AI, and it has far more electricity than the United States. In fact, China already has more electricity than the United States, Europe and India combined. The US government can prevent US companies from using Chinese models, but it can’t stop the rest of the world from using them. That won’t stop China from becoming the leader in AI. Digital intelligence comes down to how much AI compute, how many chips and how much electricity you have. The current constraint is electricity outside China. In China, the constraint is chips. China is also closer than most people realize to solving the lithography problem, which would enable it to make AI chips in very large volumes. Once we address the power constraint with AI data centers in space, the constraint will once again be chips outside China.”
4:51

Elon Musk explains how data centers in Space could help the US compete with China in AI “Given that Chinese AI companies are doing as well as they are with a relatively small amount of compute, it seems that if they had a lot of compute, there’s a good chance they would be the leaders. The constraints on AI are essentially electricity and AI chips. China is very strong in digital AI, and it has far more electricity than the United States. In fact, China already has more electricity than the United States, Europe and India combined. The US government can prevent US companies from using Chinese models, but it can’t stop the rest of the world from using them. That won’t stop China from becoming the leader in AI. Digital intelligence comes down to how much AI compute, how many chips and how much electricity you have. The current constraint is electricity outside China. In China, the constraint is chips. China is also closer than most people realize to solving the lithography problem, which would enable it to make AI chips in very large volumes. Once we address the power constraint with AI data centers in space, the constraint will once again be chips outside China.”

DogeDesigner

246,547 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🇺🇸🇨🇳 KEVIN O’LEARY: CHINA IS BEATING THE U.S. IN THE AI RACE - U.S. IS TOO SLOW TO COMPETE WITH CHINA Kevin O’Leary just sounded the alarm: China is running laps around the U.S. in artificial intelligence, and it’s not because they’re smarter, it’s because they move faster. While America spends 7 years stuck in permits to build anything, China builds massive AI data centers in 11 months because the government just says “do it” and it happens. He says China knows AI = power. “They are kicking our high knees in advancing AI. They basically say, let’s put down a 1.4 gig facility right here. Build it in the next 11 months. We got to go through 7 years of permitting in North America. The U.S. is stuck dragging its feet while China stacks chips, data, and control of the future. They're going to use it for economic dominance and military dominance.” Source: Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful One Nation with Brian Kilmeade Fox News
0:41

🇺🇸🇨🇳 KEVIN O’LEARY: CHINA IS BEATING THE U.S. IN THE AI RACE - U.S. IS TOO SLOW TO COMPETE WITH CHINA Kevin O’Leary just sounded the alarm: China is running laps around the U.S. in artificial intelligence, and it’s not because they’re smarter, it’s because they move faster. While America spends 7 years stuck in permits to build anything, China builds massive AI data centers in 11 months because the government just says “do it” and it happens. He says China knows AI = power. “They are kicking our high knees in advancing AI. They basically say, let’s put down a 1.4 gig facility right here. Build it in the next 11 months. We got to go through 7 years of permitting in North America. The U.S. is stuck dragging its feet while China stacks chips, data, and control of the future. They're going to use it for economic dominance and military dominance.” Source: Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful One Nation with Brian Kilmeade Fox News

Mario Nawfal

119,661 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨Former BlackRock fund manager Ed Dowd says "China is hoarding copper," which "indicates [it] might be getting ready for war" Dowd paints a GRIM picture of China, noting that its real estate market is "a disaster" and that it's "in a deflationary death spiral because of [its] demographics" "just because they're hoarding doesn't mean the war is imminent. It just means that they're... getting ready for something" "[But] as their economy continues to crumble, they're having the problem of consumers that are doing well... not spending—their saving and hoarding" "[and] there's going to be a lot of unemployed Chinese as we roll forward" This clip of Dowd (Edward Dowd) is taken from an interview with CapitalCosm (CapitalCosm) posted to YouTube on July 14, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "We think China is hoarding copper. China is taking— they're buying real assets. They keep printing money to the tune of 10% a year, and they're converting a lot of their trade surpluses into real assets. So they're hoarding. "Look, if you're going to hoard copper, that indicates you might be getting ready for war as well. So there seems to be a hoarding issue going on there. It's not an indication that things are really well in the economy. They continue to just buy and stockpile. "You know, look, just because they're hoarding doesn't mean the war is imminent. It just means that they're just— they're getting ready for something, and they're buying real assets. "One of the biggest problems we have with China is they're 47% of the global money supply. People don't know that... But they have very low velocity of money. That's why— and they're in a deflationary death spiral because of their demographics. So what they're doing with their money, in aggregate, is buying real assets. "And... I think our velocity of money is 1.5. China's I think is point .4 or .6. Much lower than ours. That's why, that's why you're not seeing any inflation in China. In fact, it's the opposite. The savings rate in China is exploding. There's no safety net there. "And as their economy continues to crumble, they're having, they're having the problem of the consumers that are doing well are not spending, their saving and hoarding. "[And the real estate market is] a disaster. But what held them up, the disaster started in 2021, but they had a bunch of long-lived projects that— so construction had only rolled 20%, whereas land, new permitting was down 70, 80%. So that's now starting to roll. "We saw construction year over year go negative in Q1 of this year. So those projects are now rolling off, and all they care about is employment, so there's going to be a lot of unemployed Chinese as we roll forward."
3:03

🚨Former BlackRock fund manager Ed Dowd says "China is hoarding copper," which "indicates [it] might be getting ready for war" Dowd paints a GRIM picture of China, noting that its real estate market is "a disaster" and that it's "in a deflationary death spiral because of [its] demographics" "just because they're hoarding doesn't mean the war is imminent. It just means that they're... getting ready for something" "[But] as their economy continues to crumble, they're having the problem of consumers that are doing well... not spending—their saving and hoarding" "[and] there's going to be a lot of unemployed Chinese as we roll forward" This clip of Dowd (Edward Dowd) is taken from an interview with CapitalCosm (CapitalCosm) posted to YouTube on July 14, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "We think China is hoarding copper. China is taking— they're buying real assets. They keep printing money to the tune of 10% a year, and they're converting a lot of their trade surpluses into real assets. So they're hoarding. "Look, if you're going to hoard copper, that indicates you might be getting ready for war as well. So there seems to be a hoarding issue going on there. It's not an indication that things are really well in the economy. They continue to just buy and stockpile. "You know, look, just because they're hoarding doesn't mean the war is imminent. It just means that they're just— they're getting ready for something, and they're buying real assets. "One of the biggest problems we have with China is they're 47% of the global money supply. People don't know that... But they have very low velocity of money. That's why— and they're in a deflationary death spiral because of their demographics. So what they're doing with their money, in aggregate, is buying real assets. "And... I think our velocity of money is 1.5. China's I think is point .4 or .6. Much lower than ours. That's why, that's why you're not seeing any inflation in China. In fact, it's the opposite. The savings rate in China is exploding. There's no safety net there. "And as their economy continues to crumble, they're having, they're having the problem of the consumers that are doing well are not spending, their saving and hoarding. "[And the real estate market is] a disaster. But what held them up, the disaster started in 2021, but they had a bunch of long-lived projects that— so construction had only rolled 20%, whereas land, new permitting was down 70, 80%. So that's now starting to roll. "We saw construction year over year go negative in Q1 of this year. So those projects are now rolling off, and all they care about is employment, so there's going to be a lot of unemployed Chinese as we roll forward."

Sense Receptor

15,991 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Sacks: China’s Biggest AI Advantage Over America Is Optimism @jason on China's Robot Olympics: “This is pretty crazy. The CCP is f**king brilliant at PR. Look what they did. They got a bunch of Chinese people to fill a stadium and cheer for AI and robotics. They're cheering for it. They're rooting for it.” David Sacks: “It is true that China is much more optimistic about AI than we are. AI optimism in China is over 80%. They poll on the question, ‘Do you think AI will be more beneficial than harmful?’ Over 80% of Chinese people say yes. In the US, that number is like 30%. So I've been saying for a while that the US is ahead of China in every category except one, which is optimism. And that is the biggest risk to us winning this AI race against China, is doing something that will shoot ourselves in the foot because we're so pessimistic about what AI might do.”
0:48

Sacks: China’s Biggest AI Advantage Over America Is Optimism @jason on China's Robot Olympics: “This is pretty crazy. The CCP is f**king brilliant at PR. Look what they did. They got a bunch of Chinese people to fill a stadium and cheer for AI and robotics. They're cheering for it. They're rooting for it.” David Sacks: “It is true that China is much more optimistic about AI than we are. AI optimism in China is over 80%. They poll on the question, ‘Do you think AI will be more beneficial than harmful?’ Over 80% of Chinese people say yes. In the US, that number is like 30%. So I've been saying for a while that the US is ahead of China in every category except one, which is optimism. And that is the biggest risk to us winning this AI race against China, is doing something that will shoot ourselves in the foot because we're so pessimistic about what AI might do.”

The All-In Podcast

58,016 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Hunt: So, who’s right on data centers? President Trump or Governor Shapiro? Fetterman: Oh, the president is actually right overall. I mean, you know, uh, we we used to be moving forward on data centers and now, I mean, he's actually scared by the polls. So I mean, what really what's really motivated by more than just the polls overall, you know, I set out I set up my message on it on data centers just a couple days on X where I'm saying it's, you know, the president happens to be right in this. You know, I think it's it's very necessary that we win the war on AI. Uh, we, I think it's necessary because AI is going to transform our world. And, you know, it can be either us be the leaders or it can be the Chinese. And we could we could live under those rules and they're going to build unlimited data centers. And they're not really, uh, really stopped by with the kind of like democracy and the kinds of rules that, that we have overall, I think it's important. And I would remind people, like a lot of the opposition is, is been driven by the ccp and a lot of a lot of influence. So I think now withwith data centers, uh, also there's the facts now that it, it consumes a very, very, maybe one tenth of 1%, you know, compared to almonds and compared to other other things, part of our economy and also our land usage as well, too. Pennsylvania, you know, we are energy rich, we are water rich. And we have we're land rich now. So I think it's an important part of our economy, not just for Pennsylvania's but also the country right now.
2:02

Hunt: So, who’s right on data centers? President Trump or Governor Shapiro? Fetterman: Oh, the president is actually right overall. I mean, you know, uh, we we used to be moving forward on data centers and now, I mean, he's actually scared by the polls. So I mean, what really what's really motivated by more than just the polls overall, you know, I set out I set up my message on it on data centers just a couple days on X where I'm saying it's, you know, the president happens to be right in this. You know, I think it's it's very necessary that we win the war on AI. Uh, we, I think it's necessary because AI is going to transform our world. And, you know, it can be either us be the leaders or it can be the Chinese. And we could we could live under those rules and they're going to build unlimited data centers. And they're not really, uh, really stopped by with the kind of like democracy and the kinds of rules that, that we have overall, I think it's important. And I would remind people, like a lot of the opposition is, is been driven by the ccp and a lot of a lot of influence. So I think now withwith data centers, uh, also there's the facts now that it, it consumes a very, very, maybe one tenth of 1%, you know, compared to almonds and compared to other other things, part of our economy and also our land usage as well, too. Pennsylvania, you know, we are energy rich, we are water rich. And we have we're land rich now. So I think it's an important part of our economy, not just for Pennsylvania's but also the country right now.

Acyn

204,594 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Where are DeepSeek and other Chinese AI firms going to be getting their chips over the next 5 years? Jordan Schneider says that without Nvidia hardware, they're just not going to be able to keep up. "There's this ratio between the US semi ecosystem and the China semi ecosystem. The capacity is like 15:1. "And you can project that out pretty clearly, doing some math around how much capex is being spent, how much equipment is being acquired, yield rates, etc." "So where is [DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng] going to get the chips? He's probably going to get as much Nvidia as he can get." "But the larger takeaway with the Chinese and Western ecosystems is that the Western one is way better capitalized and has way more straightforward access to chips, which is basically an order of magnitude better over at least the next 5 years." "So it's going to be rough sledding for Chinese firms." "The Chinese AI IPOs are making like, $500M. Or like $1B. And it's cute. But it's not $3 trillion. Or even $10B. And the reason that's the case is that they're not on the frontier — so they can't charge a premium — and they're compute-constrained." "If all the firms have is access to Chinese chips, it's going to be really difficult to make a lot of money, and keep paying for more chips, in the way that the Western labs have been able to mobilize the entire global financial system."
2:28

Where are DeepSeek and other Chinese AI firms going to be getting their chips over the next 5 years? Jordan Schneider says that without Nvidia hardware, they're just not going to be able to keep up. "There's this ratio between the US semi ecosystem and the China semi ecosystem. The capacity is like 15:1. "And you can project that out pretty clearly, doing some math around how much capex is being spent, how much equipment is being acquired, yield rates, etc." "So where is [DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng] going to get the chips? He's probably going to get as much Nvidia as he can get." "But the larger takeaway with the Chinese and Western ecosystems is that the Western one is way better capitalized and has way more straightforward access to chips, which is basically an order of magnitude better over at least the next 5 years." "So it's going to be rough sledding for Chinese firms." "The Chinese AI IPOs are making like, $500M. Or like $1B. And it's cute. But it's not $3 trillion. Or even $10B. And the reason that's the case is that they're not on the frontier — so they can't charge a premium — and they're compute-constrained." "If all the firms have is access to Chinese chips, it's going to be really difficult to make a lot of money, and keep paying for more chips, in the way that the Western labs have been able to mobilize the entire global financial system."

TBPN

52,507 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

In just 3 minutes, Ken Griffin (Citadel) & Larry Fink (BlackRock) explain the current state of government overspending, AI hype, & 2026 $600B data center CapEx "The world needs a savior, & the hope is that AI is the savior that we need for productivity." "The the area of recklessness is the spending of governments around the world, who are all, with little exception, all spending well beyond their means." Big issue: "Will AI create the productivity acceleration that is honestly just hoped for in Washington & in the halls of government around the world as a ways to overcome the profligate spending that we're currently engaged in?" Citadel BlackRock World Economic Forum . . . Ken Griffin "Let's take a step back and and talk about where we are right here right now. The the area of recklessness is the spending of governments around the world, who are all, with little exception, all spending well beyond their means. That's the recklessness of this moment in history. This is not a parallel to the 1920s in terms of the recklessness of the of the private capital markets. It's a story of the recklessness of government spending. Within the private sector there's a huge question as to where AI will take us. And I, I was carefully taking notes and listening to what Larry has to say, or to what Madame Lagarde has to say, because this is one of the big issues of our moment. Will AI create the productivity acceleration that is honestly just hoped for in Washington and in the halls of government around the world as a ways to overcome the profligate spending that we're currently engaged in? The world, the world needs a savior, and the hope is that AI is the savior that we need for productivity. And the challenge with this is it is, it may or may not be. We just don't know yet. Now there's a tremendous amount of hype around AI, and in some sense the large AI companies need to create that hype to raise the tens — or actually 100, hundreds of billions, right — of billions of dollars of investment that are going into the field. Like you wouldn't be able to raise hundreds of billions of dollars. We'll spend — and Larry can probably correct me on this — but roughly $600 billion this year in cap ex for data centers in the United States. Larry Fink "I think it could be larger." Andrew Ross Sorkin "But does that mean that it's getting hyped up too much, or it's just the the hype is required as a sales mechanism?" Larry Fink "First of all, so much of the data centers are being built for cloud, right? And and the big issue is gonna be in terms of monetization of of of the spend. The data centers are being built for AI requires more advanced chips. The question is what is the lifetime of that chip. If we have new technological changes in the lifetime of the chip in one year, then that spend is gonna be really a bad spend. If the lifetime as they expect it to be is 4 or 5 years and then those chips can be used for cloud, then then I think these investments are gonna prove to be good investments. So I think it's it's gonna be — you know, if the speed of technology changes and all these investments now, they're gonna be — it's gonna be a challenge. But I agree with Ken. I think we don't know enough, but I'm personally very optimistic on how AI is gonna affect the world economy."
3:10

In just 3 minutes, Ken Griffin (Citadel) & Larry Fink (BlackRock) explain the current state of government overspending, AI hype, & 2026 $600B data center CapEx "The world needs a savior, & the hope is that AI is the savior that we need for productivity." "The the area of recklessness is the spending of governments around the world, who are all, with little exception, all spending well beyond their means." Big issue: "Will AI create the productivity acceleration that is honestly just hoped for in Washington & in the halls of government around the world as a ways to overcome the profligate spending that we're currently engaged in?" Citadel BlackRock World Economic Forum . . . Ken Griffin "Let's take a step back and and talk about where we are right here right now. The the area of recklessness is the spending of governments around the world, who are all, with little exception, all spending well beyond their means. That's the recklessness of this moment in history. This is not a parallel to the 1920s in terms of the recklessness of the of the private capital markets. It's a story of the recklessness of government spending. Within the private sector there's a huge question as to where AI will take us. And I, I was carefully taking notes and listening to what Larry has to say, or to what Madame Lagarde has to say, because this is one of the big issues of our moment. Will AI create the productivity acceleration that is honestly just hoped for in Washington and in the halls of government around the world as a ways to overcome the profligate spending that we're currently engaged in? The world, the world needs a savior, and the hope is that AI is the savior that we need for productivity. And the challenge with this is it is, it may or may not be. We just don't know yet. Now there's a tremendous amount of hype around AI, and in some sense the large AI companies need to create that hype to raise the tens — or actually 100, hundreds of billions, right — of billions of dollars of investment that are going into the field. Like you wouldn't be able to raise hundreds of billions of dollars. We'll spend — and Larry can probably correct me on this — but roughly $600 billion this year in cap ex for data centers in the United States. Larry Fink "I think it could be larger." Andrew Ross Sorkin "But does that mean that it's getting hyped up too much, or it's just the the hype is required as a sales mechanism?" Larry Fink "First of all, so much of the data centers are being built for cloud, right? And and the big issue is gonna be in terms of monetization of of of the spend. The data centers are being built for AI requires more advanced chips. The question is what is the lifetime of that chip. If we have new technological changes in the lifetime of the chip in one year, then that spend is gonna be really a bad spend. If the lifetime as they expect it to be is 4 or 5 years and then those chips can be used for cloud, then then I think these investments are gonna prove to be good investments. So I think it's it's gonna be — you know, if the speed of technology changes and all these investments now, they're gonna be — it's gonna be a challenge. But I agree with Ken. I think we don't know enough, but I'm personally very optimistic on how AI is gonna affect the world economy."

Molly O’Shea

33,210 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Ask any AI CEO why they need half a trillion dollars in data centers. They have one answer. If we don't do it, China will. Do you want China to get AGI first? Here's the problem. America already has ten times as many data centers as China. The race is not close. And ask yourself a simple question. If you could have free water and electricity or free ChatGPT which one do you pick? You need water to live. You don't need ChatGPT at all. The fear of China is not analysis. It's a fundraising strategy.
1:17

Ask any AI CEO why they need half a trillion dollars in data centers. They have one answer. If we don't do it, China will. Do you want China to get AGI first? Here's the problem. America already has ten times as many data centers as China. The race is not close. And ask yourself a simple question. If you could have free water and electricity or free ChatGPT which one do you pick? You need water to live. You don't need ChatGPT at all. The fear of China is not analysis. It's a fundraising strategy.

Predictive History

13,215 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

"I think what tech people misunderstand is just the size of the TAM in pharma." delian says capital will rotate into pharma after AGI: "Anthropic is at what, a $60B run rate? Keytruda, the drug that Merck did in 2019, that one drug's topline is $25B in revenue. Just that one drug." "By the way, once there's AGI, what do you think everybody's going to be focused on afterwards? Everybody's just going to want to live forever. Where do you think the capital is going to rotate into? It's going to rotate into longevity, therapeutics, and manufacturing."
1:04

"I think what tech people misunderstand is just the size of the TAM in pharma." delian says capital will rotate into pharma after AGI: "Anthropic is at what, a $60B run rate? Keytruda, the drug that Merck did in 2019, that one drug's topline is $25B in revenue. Just that one drug." "By the way, once there's AGI, what do you think everybody's going to be focused on afterwards? Everybody's just going to want to live forever. Where do you think the capital is going to rotate into? It's going to rotate into longevity, therapeutics, and manufacturing."

TBPN

396,722 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Palmer Luckey on Anduril’s “China 27” strategy and how China could move on Taiwan 🇺🇸🇹🇼🇨🇳 “Anduril has an internal policy called China 27. The idea is that anything we are working on, anything that we are investing in, needs to be built with the assumption that sometime in 2027 China is going to move on Taiwan. I might be wrong on this. It might be a longer. I think that it is very likely that China moves on Taiwan for a variety of political reasons. If you had to ask me, it’s more likely that they don’t do a full-scale invasion to start. It’s much more likely that they do something like a blockade. I worry about them kind of boiling the frog. They’ve got one port, and then two ports, and then the airports, and then the people of Taiwan are running out of money, running out of food. You boil the frog enough, there’s never a point where Taiwan really wants to fire the first shot and actually start a war. Boiling the frog… I think is what China will do with Taiwan.”
2:23

Palmer Luckey on Anduril’s “China 27” strategy and how China could move on Taiwan 🇺🇸🇹🇼🇨🇳 “Anduril has an internal policy called China 27. The idea is that anything we are working on, anything that we are investing in, needs to be built with the assumption that sometime in 2027 China is going to move on Taiwan. I might be wrong on this. It might be a longer. I think that it is very likely that China moves on Taiwan for a variety of political reasons. If you had to ask me, it’s more likely that they don’t do a full-scale invasion to start. It’s much more likely that they do something like a blockade. I worry about them kind of boiling the frog. They’ve got one port, and then two ports, and then the airports, and then the people of Taiwan are running out of money, running out of food. You boil the frog enough, there’s never a point where Taiwan really wants to fire the first shot and actually start a war. Boiling the frog… I think is what China will do with Taiwan.”

Garrett Wright

213,534 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

JUST IN - GOV. RON DESANTIS ON TAKING IN 600K CHINESE STUDENTS: "I'd rather those slots go to American students." "A significant percentage of the Chinese students, they are engaged with the CCP. It used to be, they would say 'oh, you bring the people from China, they're going to love America. They'll go back and be ambassadors and China will change.' But, obviously, that has not happened. Because this has been going on for decades." "The fact we have 300,000 now is way out of bounds of what most people want to see."
0:36

JUST IN - GOV. RON DESANTIS ON TAKING IN 600K CHINESE STUDENTS: "I'd rather those slots go to American students." "A significant percentage of the Chinese students, they are engaged with the CCP. It used to be, they would say 'oh, you bring the people from China, they're going to love America. They'll go back and be ambassadors and China will change.' But, obviously, that has not happened. Because this has been going on for decades." "The fact we have 300,000 now is way out of bounds of what most people want to see."

Florida’s Voice

131,992 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Leopold explains his approach to not blowing up (2024) "Obviously, not blowing up is task number one and two or whatever. I think this investment firm is going to just be betting on AGI and superintelligence before the decade is out, making the bets you would make if you took that seriously." "I think if that's wrong, the firm is not going to do that well." "The thing you have to be able to resist is, you know, one or a couple or a few individual calls. It's like AI stagnates for a year because of the data wall, or you got the call wrong on when revenue would go up." "You have to get timing right. I do think in general that the sequence of bets on the way to AGI is actually pretty critical, and something people underrate."
0:42

Leopold explains his approach to not blowing up (2024) "Obviously, not blowing up is task number one and two or whatever. I think this investment firm is going to just be betting on AGI and superintelligence before the decade is out, making the bets you would make if you took that seriously." "I think if that's wrong, the firm is not going to do that well." "The thing you have to be able to resist is, you know, one or a couple or a few individual calls. It's like AI stagnates for a year because of the data wall, or you got the call wrong on when revenue would go up." "You have to get timing right. I do think in general that the sequence of bets on the way to AGI is actually pretty critical, and something people underrate."

dnap

2,336,394 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

“The Chinese are skeptical of our calls for international cooperation on AI. They think they're in a race with us. And if they think they're in a race with us, it's kind of hard for us not to be in a race with them. And that's just the way it is.” “And at the end of the day, the Chinese government is a dictatorship that's nationalist and socialist and doesn't really want to cooperate with us much. They want to beat us. They want to compete with us. So, we can try. It's worth trying.” “But the record shows, according to 100% of the evidence, that when you sign an AI or a nuclear or a cyber-hacking document with the Chinese government, it turns out not to be held up. It turns out that they're not actually trustworthy.”
0:39

“The Chinese are skeptical of our calls for international cooperation on AI. They think they're in a race with us. And if they think they're in a race with us, it's kind of hard for us not to be in a race with them. And that's just the way it is.” “And at the end of the day, the Chinese government is a dictatorship that's nationalist and socialist and doesn't really want to cooperate with us much. They want to beat us. They want to compete with us. So, we can try. It's worth trying.” “But the record shows, according to 100% of the evidence, that when you sign an AI or a nuclear or a cyber-hacking document with the Chinese government, it turns out not to be held up. It turns out that they're not actually trustworthy.”

Josh Rogin

24,290 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

“This idea that if we regulate AI, that China will win, is not true. And the way that we know that is because China regulates AI. They have the most regulation of their AI than any country in the world. And they're moving very, very fast. They're almost at where we are or maybe going to beat us. And they have a ton of regulation.” “So the tech bros in the U.S. that say if we regulate AI, the Chinese going to win - that’s a self-serving argument. That isn't true. But at the same time, we have to understand that Chinese regulation of AI is meant to protect the Chinese Communist Party. When we talk about regulation of AI, we're talking about protecting our privacy, our citizens, our data, our democracy. They don't care about that in China. They don't have that.”
0:45

“This idea that if we regulate AI, that China will win, is not true. And the way that we know that is because China regulates AI. They have the most regulation of their AI than any country in the world. And they're moving very, very fast. They're almost at where we are or maybe going to beat us. And they have a ton of regulation.” “So the tech bros in the U.S. that say if we regulate AI, the Chinese going to win - that’s a self-serving argument. That isn't true. But at the same time, we have to understand that Chinese regulation of AI is meant to protect the Chinese Communist Party. When we talk about regulation of AI, we're talking about protecting our privacy, our citizens, our data, our democracy. They don't care about that in China. They don't have that.”

Josh Rogin

55,198 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

David Sacks: The Techno-Realist On E215, David Sacks explained a third category outside of techno-optimist and doomer: "Given the choice between the two categories of techno-optimist and techno-pessimist, I'm definitely in the optimist camp. And I think we should be." "But I think there's actually a third category that I would submit: techno-realist." "Which is, technology is going to happen. Trying to stop it is like ordering the tides to stop." "AI is going to happen. We might as well be the leader." "If we don't do it, somebody else will. China's going to do it or somebody else will do it." "If we don't, we could lose in a key category that has implications for national security, for our economy, for many things." "That's just not a world we want to live in." "So, I think a lot of this debate is sort of academic because the question is just, is it going to happen or not?" "And I think the answer is yes. So then we want to control it." "There's not a tremendous amount of choice in this, I think."
0:43

David Sacks: The Techno-Realist On E215, David Sacks explained a third category outside of techno-optimist and doomer: "Given the choice between the two categories of techno-optimist and techno-pessimist, I'm definitely in the optimist camp. And I think we should be." "But I think there's actually a third category that I would submit: techno-realist." "Which is, technology is going to happen. Trying to stop it is like ordering the tides to stop." "AI is going to happen. We might as well be the leader." "If we don't do it, somebody else will. China's going to do it or somebody else will do it." "If we don't, we could lose in a key category that has implications for national security, for our economy, for many things." "That's just not a world we want to live in." "So, I think a lot of this debate is sort of academic because the question is just, is it going to happen or not?" "And I think the answer is yes. So then we want to control it." "There's not a tremendous amount of choice in this, I think."

The All-In Podcast

154,348 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST LAID IT STRAIGHT when asked why China launched a cyberattack on us He knows something we don't! Q: We just heard from the FBI recently that there was a major cyber attack attributed to China. TRUMP: "We do it to them. They do it to us." Q: Well, what was the last time we did a cyber attack in China? TRUMP: "I'm not going to tell you that, but we do them. They do us. It's been like that for a long time." Q: So it's not going to be addressed? TRUMP: "I'll address things, but you know, it is what it is. Look, China's China, they're never easy, but we're doing great with China. I'm the toughest person in China, anywhere in the world. I put on 100 percent tariff on Chinese cars."
0:59

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST LAID IT STRAIGHT when asked why China launched a cyberattack on us He knows something we don't! Q: We just heard from the FBI recently that there was a major cyber attack attributed to China. TRUMP: "We do it to them. They do it to us." Q: Well, what was the last time we did a cyber attack in China? TRUMP: "I'm not going to tell you that, but we do them. They do us. It's been like that for a long time." Q: So it's not going to be addressed? TRUMP: "I'll address things, but you know, it is what it is. Look, China's China, they're never easy, but we're doing great with China. I'm the toughest person in China, anywhere in the world. I put on 100 percent tariff on Chinese cars."

Eric Daugherty

1,416,007 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten