Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Clark, Devay, and Martinez just won the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics for proving quantum mechanics scales beyond atoms. They cooled a Josephson junction to millikelvin temperatures and watched billions of electrons tunnel as a single wave function — something classical physics says is impossible. The proof: escape rate...

0xEronn's profile picture

Eron

6,987 subscribers

12,882 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Daniel A Lloyd
Daniel A Lloydvor 9 Tagen

Now add reality.

Profilbild von Adam Moyer
Adam Moyervor 9 Tagen

Here is the answer to the infamous double slit experiments.

Profilbild von Joseph Buerkle
Joseph Buerklevor 7 Tagen

What if quantum tunneling is just a crack in the wall.

Profilbild von That one Genius!
That one Genius!vor 6 Tagen

What explains the quantum tunneling? So basically you're having to go to Millikelvin temperatures to create or even see that quantum mechanics goes beyond atoms, or is this able to be viewed without freezing the shit out of it, ever? If not then how can it be present in nature?

Profilbild von Sniper
Snipervor 9 Tagen

.

Profilbild von Xerxiez
Xerxiezvor 9 Tagen

So we can move through walls?!

Profilbild von Lionitis
Lionitisvor 5 Tagen

Just won the 2025 Nobel Prize?

Profilbild von 奇韬者
奇韬者vor 9 Tagen

Quantum hegemony

Profilbild von Meidas.Noticing
Meidas.Noticingvor 9 Tagen

Mind blown

Profilbild von Inglorius Bad-Takes
Inglorius Bad-Takesvor 9 Tagen

Excellent explanation of cooper pairs and superconducting behavior.

Ähnliche Videos

Every quantum state in the universe is a vector - not in 3D space, but in a complex space with potentially infinite dimensions where the sum of squared coefficients always equals exactly 1. That constraint is the same math LLMs use to normalize probability distributions over tokens. A wavefunction collapsing to a measurement and a softmax choosing the next word are the same operation - projecting an infinite-dimensional vector onto a basis. Claude and GPT do quantum math on every forward pass. 14 minutes. Bookmark & watch today. Quantum mechanics and LLMs speak the same language.
15:45

Every quantum state in the universe is a vector - not in 3D space, but in a complex space with potentially infinite dimensions where the sum of squared coefficients always equals exactly 1. That constraint is the same math LLMs use to normalize probability distributions over tokens. A wavefunction collapsing to a measurement and a softmax choosing the next word are the same operation - projecting an infinite-dimensional vector onto a basis. Claude and GPT do quantum math on every forward pass. 14 minutes. Bookmark & watch today. Quantum mechanics and LLMs speak the same language.

Eron

18,166 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

6,100-Qubit Processor Shatters Quantum Computing Record | David Nield, ScienceAlert Another major quantum computing record has been broken, and by a considerable margin: physicists have now built an array containing 6,100 qubits, the largest of its type and way above the thousand or so qubits previous systems contained. It's the work of scientists from the California Institute of Technology, who used cesium atoms as their qubits, trapping them in place with a complex system of lasers that acted as tweezers to keep the atoms as stable as possible. Qubits differ from the classical bits of traditional computers by exploiting what's known as a superposition: not just binary states of 1 or 0, but a spread of probabilities that allows for algorithms that can solve problems considered out of reach of conventional computing methods. Related: Quantum Advantage: A Physicist Explains The Future of Computers A lot of qubits will be needed to make quantum algorithms practical, however. One reason for these large arrays is error correction, which helps overcome the inherent fragility of the qubit by providing a surplus to double-check the machine's operation. "This is an exciting moment for neutral-atom quantum computing," says physicist Manuel Endres. "We can now see a pathway to large error-corrected quantum computers. The building blocks are in place." There was no single breakthrough that enabled this jump in qubit numbers, but rather a series of engineering advancements in many key areas – from the laser tweezers to the ultra-high (very low pressure) vacuum chamber. Stability has also been a problem for quantum computing systems. The innovations in this latest array kept qubits in a superposition state for almost 13 seconds – almost ten times longer than previous configurations had managed. What's more, individual qubits could be manipulated with 99.98 percent accuracy, establishing a significant benchmark in the programmability of quantum technology. "Large scale, with more atoms, is often thought to come at the expense of accuracy, but our results show that we can do both," says physicist Gyohei Nomura. "Qubits aren't useful without quality. Now we have quantity and quality." To make quantum computers a practical alternative to modern supercomputers, more qubits and even greater levels of stability will be required. Experts are tackling the problem from several different angles, which is why records for some types of quantum computer don't necessarily apply to others. Next, the researchers need to work on exploiting entanglement, which will enable the system to make the leap from storing information to actually processing it. Not too far in the future, we could be using these computers to discover new materials, matter, and fundamental laws of physics. "It's exciting that we are creating machines to help us learn about the Universe in ways that only quantum mechanics can teach us," says physicist Hannah Manetsch. Read more:
1:54

6,100-Qubit Processor Shatters Quantum Computing Record | David Nield, ScienceAlert Another major quantum computing record has been broken, and by a considerable margin: physicists have now built an array containing 6,100 qubits, the largest of its type and way above the thousand or so qubits previous systems contained. It's the work of scientists from the California Institute of Technology, who used cesium atoms as their qubits, trapping them in place with a complex system of lasers that acted as tweezers to keep the atoms as stable as possible. Qubits differ from the classical bits of traditional computers by exploiting what's known as a superposition: not just binary states of 1 or 0, but a spread of probabilities that allows for algorithms that can solve problems considered out of reach of conventional computing methods. Related: Quantum Advantage: A Physicist Explains The Future of Computers A lot of qubits will be needed to make quantum algorithms practical, however. One reason for these large arrays is error correction, which helps overcome the inherent fragility of the qubit by providing a surplus to double-check the machine's operation. "This is an exciting moment for neutral-atom quantum computing," says physicist Manuel Endres. "We can now see a pathway to large error-corrected quantum computers. The building blocks are in place." There was no single breakthrough that enabled this jump in qubit numbers, but rather a series of engineering advancements in many key areas – from the laser tweezers to the ultra-high (very low pressure) vacuum chamber. Stability has also been a problem for quantum computing systems. The innovations in this latest array kept qubits in a superposition state for almost 13 seconds – almost ten times longer than previous configurations had managed. What's more, individual qubits could be manipulated with 99.98 percent accuracy, establishing a significant benchmark in the programmability of quantum technology. "Large scale, with more atoms, is often thought to come at the expense of accuracy, but our results show that we can do both," says physicist Gyohei Nomura. "Qubits aren't useful without quality. Now we have quantity and quality." To make quantum computers a practical alternative to modern supercomputers, more qubits and even greater levels of stability will be required. Experts are tackling the problem from several different angles, which is why records for some types of quantum computer don't necessarily apply to others. Next, the researchers need to work on exploiting entanglement, which will enable the system to make the leap from storing information to actually processing it. Not too far in the future, we could be using these computers to discover new materials, matter, and fundamental laws of physics. "It's exciting that we are creating machines to help us learn about the Universe in ways that only quantum mechanics can teach us," says physicist Hannah Manetsch. Read more:

Owen Gregorian

45,324 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

On September 8, 2026, OpenAI published a proof that the Navier-Stokes equations can break down - a question open since 1934 and one of seven $1 million Clay Millennium Prize problems. Every weather forecast, aircraft simulation, and fluid physics engine running on GPU clusters assumes these equations always work. This proof says they don't. The solution constructs a vortex that stretches itself infinitely thin in finite time - fluid spiraling inward, escaping upward, accelerating without limit. Every step verified by a computer in the formal proof language Lean. 4 minutes. Bookmark & watch today. The most important math result of 2026.
2:31

On September 8, 2026, OpenAI published a proof that the Navier-Stokes equations can break down - a question open since 1934 and one of seven $1 million Clay Millennium Prize problems. Every weather forecast, aircraft simulation, and fluid physics engine running on GPU clusters assumes these equations always work. This proof says they don't. The solution constructs a vortex that stretches itself infinitely thin in finite time - fluid spiraling inward, escaping upward, accelerating without limit. Every step verified by a computer in the formal proof language Lean. 4 minutes. Bookmark & watch today. The most important math result of 2026.

Deliriumm

42,744 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

"For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature." J J Thomson won the 1906 (not 1907 as claimed) Nobel Prize in Physics "in recognition of the great merits of his theoretical and experimental investigations on the conduction of electricity by gases." His son, G P Thomson (not P J Thomson) won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1937 for showing "diffraction properties" of electrons. Erwin Schrodinger never called electrons wavicles and it was not in 1932, but 1926, and Nobel Prize in 1933, for the Schrodinger wave equation describing the behaviour of a particle in a field of force or the change of a physical quantity over time. The equation showed that electrons can have the properties of either waves or particles, and their state can only be calculated with probability This discovery settled the dispute over whether quantum objects such as electrons, atoms, or molecules were waves or particles. Werner Heisenberg never said "we don't know what an electron is. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1932 (not 1956) for his theory of quantum mechanics and its applications, including the discovery of allotropic forms of hydrogen. The original concept of the photon was developed by Albert Einstein. In 1926 the optical physicist Frithiof Wolfers and the chemist Gilbert N. Lewis coined the name photon for these particles. Photons have nothing to do with electrons that was the point of discussion until now. The Hindu scriptures have nothing scientific in them. Absolutely nothing. Like all other Holy scriptures, it's fiction. B M Hegde was a reputable Cardiologist. But now he's an Ayurveda sympathizing quack who has rented out his brain in memory of ancient Sages who wrote fictionalized observations from primal theories. B M Hegde is now a shell of his former self mostly guided by spinal level thinking, brought on by senility and loss of logic. Stop circulating his videos on social media. He's merely the remnant of an intelligence from a bygone era.
1:23

"For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature." J J Thomson won the 1906 (not 1907 as claimed) Nobel Prize in Physics "in recognition of the great merits of his theoretical and experimental investigations on the conduction of electricity by gases." His son, G P Thomson (not P J Thomson) won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1937 for showing "diffraction properties" of electrons. Erwin Schrodinger never called electrons wavicles and it was not in 1932, but 1926, and Nobel Prize in 1933, for the Schrodinger wave equation describing the behaviour of a particle in a field of force or the change of a physical quantity over time. The equation showed that electrons can have the properties of either waves or particles, and their state can only be calculated with probability This discovery settled the dispute over whether quantum objects such as electrons, atoms, or molecules were waves or particles. Werner Heisenberg never said "we don't know what an electron is. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1932 (not 1956) for his theory of quantum mechanics and its applications, including the discovery of allotropic forms of hydrogen. The original concept of the photon was developed by Albert Einstein. In 1926 the optical physicist Frithiof Wolfers and the chemist Gilbert N. Lewis coined the name photon for these particles. Photons have nothing to do with electrons that was the point of discussion until now. The Hindu scriptures have nothing scientific in them. Absolutely nothing. Like all other Holy scriptures, it's fiction. B M Hegde was a reputable Cardiologist. But now he's an Ayurveda sympathizing quack who has rented out his brain in memory of ancient Sages who wrote fictionalized observations from primal theories. B M Hegde is now a shell of his former self mostly guided by spinal level thinking, brought on by senility and loss of logic. Stop circulating his videos on social media. He's merely the remnant of an intelligence from a bygone era.

TheLiverDoc™

204,568 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Complex numbers aren't imaginary. They're the only way to describe a wave that has both amplitude and phase at the same time - and every LLM processes language as exactly that kind of wave through its attention layers. The same math that describes quantum wave interference is what makes Fourier transforms work, which is what lets GPT process tokens in parallel instead of one at a time. Descartes named them "imaginary" before anyone understood what they were. 20 minutes. Bookmark & watch today. The confusion clears up faster than any textbook manages.
19:29

Complex numbers aren't imaginary. They're the only way to describe a wave that has both amplitude and phase at the same time - and every LLM processes language as exactly that kind of wave through its attention layers. The same math that describes quantum wave interference is what makes Fourier transforms work, which is what lets GPT process tokens in parallel instead of one at a time. Descartes named them "imaginary" before anyone understood what they were. 20 minutes. Bookmark & watch today. The confusion clears up faster than any textbook manages.

Eron

43,247 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

MIT put its full quantum physics course online for free and the opening lecture starts with a box you can't look inside. Almost nobody finishes it. This is 8.04, Quantum Physics I, taught by Allan Adams on the MIT campus. Same room, same problem sets, same professor the tuition pays for. He skips the history and the philosophy. He builds a simple apparatus, sends things through it, and shows the result no classical picture can survive. Skip the first 10 minutes, that part is course admin. What follows is thought experiment stacked on thought experiment until superposition stops being a word and becomes the only explanation left. Every engineer arguing about quantum computing in 2026 is arguing about what happens in this hour. A systems engineer I know watched it twice with a notebook and called it the clearest teaching he'd seen since university. MIT charges $60,000 a year. This lecture costs nothing. The gate was never locked. Almost nobody walks through.
1:15:32

MIT put its full quantum physics course online for free and the opening lecture starts with a box you can't look inside. Almost nobody finishes it. This is 8.04, Quantum Physics I, taught by Allan Adams on the MIT campus. Same room, same problem sets, same professor the tuition pays for. He skips the history and the philosophy. He builds a simple apparatus, sends things through it, and shows the result no classical picture can survive. Skip the first 10 minutes, that part is course admin. What follows is thought experiment stacked on thought experiment until superposition stops being a word and becomes the only explanation left. Every engineer arguing about quantum computing in 2026 is arguing about what happens in this hour. A systems engineer I know watched it twice with a notebook and called it the clearest teaching he'd seen since university. MIT charges $60,000 a year. This lecture costs nothing. The gate was never locked. Almost nobody walks through.

xanax

14,430 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

IIT Madras professor S. Lakshmi Bala walks a full quantum mechanics class through the two-level atom, and she does it for free. Western physics departments charge over $2,000 per credit for a graduate course in quantum mechanics. This entire course has been free since the early 2000s, but someone is trying to hide it. In this lecture she has already moved past abstract vector spaces into a real physical system, the same two-level atom model that shows up later in laser physics and quantum computing. No login wall. No certificate fee to just watch. One professor, one blackboard, one camera that never stopped rolling for over 40 lectures. Physics departments built million dollar tuition systems around gatekeeping exactly this material. IIT Madras just recorded it and gave it away through NPTEL, a program that now hosts over 3,200 free courses. ▪ $0 to watch, no account required ▪ Filmed lecture hall style since the early 2000s ▪ Same physics that underlies quantum computing today 🔖Just don't lose it and find a way to save the lecture, because other paid institutions don't want you to have access to it for free.
46:58

IIT Madras professor S. Lakshmi Bala walks a full quantum mechanics class through the two-level atom, and she does it for free. Western physics departments charge over $2,000 per credit for a graduate course in quantum mechanics. This entire course has been free since the early 2000s, but someone is trying to hide it. In this lecture she has already moved past abstract vector spaces into a real physical system, the same two-level atom model that shows up later in laser physics and quantum computing. No login wall. No certificate fee to just watch. One professor, one blackboard, one camera that never stopped rolling for over 40 lectures. Physics departments built million dollar tuition systems around gatekeeping exactly this material. IIT Madras just recorded it and gave it away through NPTEL, a program that now hosts over 3,200 free courses. ▪ $0 to watch, no account required ▪ Filmed lecture hall style since the early 2000s ▪ Same physics that underlies quantum computing today 🔖Just don't lose it and find a way to save the lecture, because other paid institutions don't want you to have access to it for free.

Trixi

582,903 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

$IONQ "The world still massively underestimates just how disruptive it's going to be." Chris Ballance IonQ President of Quantum Computing laid out the whole picture with Kearney's Brent Smolinski. Start to finish: What it is → Quantum computers run on quantum physics, not classical logic - for Ballance, the most powerful form of computing the laws of physics allow. They solve in minutes what a classical machine couldn't crack in the lifetime of the universe. Where we are → "The end of the beginning." Real systems exist, you can buy one from IonQ today, and the field is speed-running the computing revolution. The race now: who scales the best platform the fastest. The value comes in three eras → - Early: problems classical can't touch - chemistry & drug discovery (with AstraZeneca), crash-analysis simulation (with Ansys). - Middle: familiar work, but faster, better or far less energy - AI fine-tuning, most likely hybrid: a GPU farm and a quantum computer side by side, more than the sum of their parts. - Late: unknown. The killer applications are never the ones you expect. Quantum advantage → Not a benchmark stunt - a better solution per dollar invested in quantum than classical. Hard to spot, but already real for certain early problems. The economics → His sharpest line: compute is now just a markup on electricity. With a fixed budget, the question is classical or quantum - and some of the first quantum wins won't be faster, just orders of magnitude cheaper. The architectures → Superconducting (IBM, Google): first-mover lead and standard chip fabs - but chips chilled to a thousandth of a degree above absolute zero, huge energy-hungry refrigeration, and a quantum chip "three orders of magnitude harder" than Intel's toughest. It loses coherence fast, too: many redundant qubits, far bigger machines. Trapped ions (IonQ): individual atoms - and an atom is "guaranteed perfect across the universe." No fab variation, far lower error rates, no exotic cooling. The atoms are run by an ordinary classical chip, so IonQ rides the trillion-dollar semiconductor industry instead of inventing a quantum chip. (Oxford Ionics' Electronic Qubit Control, SkyWater foundry) Why it's green → A future million-qubit machine is about a dozen racks drawing minuscule power - orders of magnitude less than a large AI data center. Classical can still gain 10–100×, but not the orders of magnitude quantum unlocks. His call: within ~10 years, some 100-megawatt NVIDIA clusters could sit vacant. Quick-fire → - Most over-hyped: changing biology. - Most underestimated risk: integrating into real customer workflows. - First to adopt: finance ) portfolio analysis & fraud prevention. - Most exciting: the speed of change over the next 24 months. The personal why → What gets him out of bed: reinventing how we think about computation and the belief that the world still underestimates how disruptive this will be. For leaders → Quantum computing is here now. Adopting any new tech takes 2-3 years, so the moment to start isn't next year it's now, so you're ready when the hardware lands. Full conversation below ↓ $IONQ #IonQ #Quantum
17:04

$IONQ "The world still massively underestimates just how disruptive it's going to be." Chris Ballance IonQ President of Quantum Computing laid out the whole picture with Kearney's Brent Smolinski. Start to finish: What it is → Quantum computers run on quantum physics, not classical logic - for Ballance, the most powerful form of computing the laws of physics allow. They solve in minutes what a classical machine couldn't crack in the lifetime of the universe. Where we are → "The end of the beginning." Real systems exist, you can buy one from IonQ today, and the field is speed-running the computing revolution. The race now: who scales the best platform the fastest. The value comes in three eras → - Early: problems classical can't touch - chemistry & drug discovery (with AstraZeneca), crash-analysis simulation (with Ansys). - Middle: familiar work, but faster, better or far less energy - AI fine-tuning, most likely hybrid: a GPU farm and a quantum computer side by side, more than the sum of their parts. - Late: unknown. The killer applications are never the ones you expect. Quantum advantage → Not a benchmark stunt - a better solution per dollar invested in quantum than classical. Hard to spot, but already real for certain early problems. The economics → His sharpest line: compute is now just a markup on electricity. With a fixed budget, the question is classical or quantum - and some of the first quantum wins won't be faster, just orders of magnitude cheaper. The architectures → Superconducting (IBM, Google): first-mover lead and standard chip fabs - but chips chilled to a thousandth of a degree above absolute zero, huge energy-hungry refrigeration, and a quantum chip "three orders of magnitude harder" than Intel's toughest. It loses coherence fast, too: many redundant qubits, far bigger machines. Trapped ions (IonQ): individual atoms - and an atom is "guaranteed perfect across the universe." No fab variation, far lower error rates, no exotic cooling. The atoms are run by an ordinary classical chip, so IonQ rides the trillion-dollar semiconductor industry instead of inventing a quantum chip. (Oxford Ionics' Electronic Qubit Control, SkyWater foundry) Why it's green → A future million-qubit machine is about a dozen racks drawing minuscule power - orders of magnitude less than a large AI data center. Classical can still gain 10–100×, but not the orders of magnitude quantum unlocks. His call: within ~10 years, some 100-megawatt NVIDIA clusters could sit vacant. Quick-fire → - Most over-hyped: changing biology. - Most underestimated risk: integrating into real customer workflows. - First to adopt: finance ) portfolio analysis & fraud prevention. - Most exciting: the speed of change over the next 24 months. The personal why → What gets him out of bed: reinventing how we think about computation and the belief that the world still underestimates how disruptive this will be. For leaders → Quantum computing is here now. Adopting any new tech takes 2-3 years, so the moment to start isn't next year it's now, so you're ready when the hardware lands. Full conversation below ↓ $IONQ #IonQ #Quantum

TechInnovation

26,310 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A Nobel laureate flew to Bengaluru and spent 90 minutes on the questions physics still cannot answer. The stream sits almost unwatched. This is David Gross at the Chandrasekhar Auditorium, ICTS-TIFR, August 2025. The subject is the frontiers of fundamental physics. Gross shared the 2004 Nobel Prize for asymptotic freedom, the discovery that the force binding quarks weakens as they are pushed together. He also worked on string theory as an approach to quantum gravity. The talk is a map of the open territory. What the standard model explains, what it never touched, and where the field has been stuck for decades. Watch how he separates the settled from the unsettled. No hedging, no salesmanship, a man who won the prize describing what remains unsolved. A physicist I know rewatched the section on quantum gravity twice and said it was the cleanest statement of the gap he had heard. Free on YouTube from an Indian research institute, full lecture, subtitles on. The prizes go to the answers. The frontier is still a list of questions.
1:32:20

A Nobel laureate flew to Bengaluru and spent 90 minutes on the questions physics still cannot answer. The stream sits almost unwatched. This is David Gross at the Chandrasekhar Auditorium, ICTS-TIFR, August 2025. The subject is the frontiers of fundamental physics. Gross shared the 2004 Nobel Prize for asymptotic freedom, the discovery that the force binding quarks weakens as they are pushed together. He also worked on string theory as an approach to quantum gravity. The talk is a map of the open territory. What the standard model explains, what it never touched, and where the field has been stuck for decades. Watch how he separates the settled from the unsettled. No hedging, no salesmanship, a man who won the prize describing what remains unsolved. A physicist I know rewatched the section on quantum gravity twice and said it was the cleanest statement of the gap he had heard. Free on YouTube from an Indian research institute, full lecture, subtitles on. The prizes go to the answers. The frontier is still a list of questions.

Merlow

24,259 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Why String Theory Won't Die The string theory idea refuses to die because it's one of the few frameworks that forces a quantum object and spacetime geometry into the same picture. In the render, a closed string isn’t just a loop doing pretty vibrations. Its internal phase pattern is a quantum degree of freedom, shown as color. At the same time, its motion stirs ripples in the surrounding metric, shown as the fabric below. One object, two roles. A wave-like state living on the string, and a curvature-like response spreading through the background. You can literally watch quantum stuff and gravity stuff talk to each other in the same scene. #StringTheory #Physics #QuantumMechanics #GeneralRelativity #MathematicalPhysics #SciComm
1:00

Why String Theory Won't Die The string theory idea refuses to die because it's one of the few frameworks that forces a quantum object and spacetime geometry into the same picture. In the render, a closed string isn’t just a loop doing pretty vibrations. Its internal phase pattern is a quantum degree of freedom, shown as color. At the same time, its motion stirs ripples in the surrounding metric, shown as the fabric below. One object, two roles. A wave-like state living on the string, and a curvature-like response spreading through the background. You can literally watch quantum stuff and gravity stuff talk to each other in the same scene. #StringTheory #Physics #QuantumMechanics #GeneralRelativity #MathematicalPhysics #SciComm

Mathelirium

13,657 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

An IIT Madras physics professor teaches a full graduate level quantum mechanics course for free, and almost nobody outside India has heard of it. It's part of something called NPTEL, a government backed program that now hosts over 3,200 free university courses taught by professors at IIT and IISc, India's top engineering and science schools. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala's course, Quantum Mechanics I, runs through the same material a physics graduate student would sit through in a paid semester: postulates of quantum mechanics, angular momentum, quantum optics, all of it filmed lecture hall style and uploaded for anyone to watch. No login wall, no certificate fee required to just watch, no tuition. Just a professor, a blackboard, and a camera that's been running since the early 2000s. Western universities charge thousands per credit for exactly this kind of course. India just recorded it and gave it away. Is this the biggest free education archive nobody talks about, or are people just not looking?
49:19

An IIT Madras physics professor teaches a full graduate level quantum mechanics course for free, and almost nobody outside India has heard of it. It's part of something called NPTEL, a government backed program that now hosts over 3,200 free university courses taught by professors at IIT and IISc, India's top engineering and science schools. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala's course, Quantum Mechanics I, runs through the same material a physics graduate student would sit through in a paid semester: postulates of quantum mechanics, angular momentum, quantum optics, all of it filmed lecture hall style and uploaded for anyone to watch. No login wall, no certificate fee required to just watch, no tuition. Just a professor, a blackboard, and a camera that's been running since the early 2000s. Western universities charge thousands per credit for exactly this kind of course. India just recorded it and gave it away. Is this the biggest free education archive nobody talks about, or are people just not looking?

Kshitij Mishra | AI & Tech

11,592 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

An IIT Madras physics professor teaches a full graduate level quantum mechanics course for free, and almost nobody outside India has heard of it. It's part of something called NPTEL, a government backed program that now hosts over 3,200 free university courses taught by professors at IIT and IISc, India's top engineering and science schools. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala's course, Quantum Mechanics I, runs through the same material a physics graduate student would sit through in a paid semester: postulates of quantum mechanics, angular momentum, quantum optics, all of it filmed lecture hall style and uploaded for anyone to watch. No login wall, no certificate fee required to just watch, no tuition. Just a professor, a blackboard, and a camera that's been running since the early 2000s. Western universities charge thousands per credit for exactly this kind of course. India just recorded it and gave it away. Is this the biggest free education archive nobody talks about, or are people just not looking?
49:00

An IIT Madras physics professor teaches a full graduate level quantum mechanics course for free, and almost nobody outside India has heard of it. It's part of something called NPTEL, a government backed program that now hosts over 3,200 free university courses taught by professors at IIT and IISc, India's top engineering and science schools. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala's course, Quantum Mechanics I, runs through the same material a physics graduate student would sit through in a paid semester: postulates of quantum mechanics, angular momentum, quantum optics, all of it filmed lecture hall style and uploaded for anyone to watch. No login wall, no certificate fee required to just watch, no tuition. Just a professor, a blackboard, and a camera that's been running since the early 2000s. Western universities charge thousands per credit for exactly this kind of course. India just recorded it and gave it away. Is this the biggest free education archive nobody talks about, or are people just not looking?

Trixi

563,259 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

D-Wave announced a scientific breakthrough published in the esteemed journal Science Magazine, confirming that its annealing quantum computer outperformed one of the world’s most powerful classical supercomputers in solving a complex magnetic materials simulation problem with relevance to materials discovery. The new landmark peer-reviewed paper, “Beyond-Classical Computation in Quantum Simulation,” validates this achievement as the world’s first and only demonstration of quantum computational supremacy on a useful problem. An international collaboration of scientists led by D-Wave performed simulations of quantum dynamics in programmable spin glasses—a computationally hard magnetic materials simulation problem with known applications to business and science—on both D-Wave’s Advantage2™ prototype annealing quantum computer and the Frontier supercomputer at the Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge Lab. D-Wave’s quantum computer performed a complex simulation in minutes and with a level of accuracy that would take nearly a million years using the supercomputer. In addition, it would require more than the world’s annual electricity consumption to solve this problem using the supercomputer, which is built with graphics processing unit (GPU) clusters. For decades, scientists have aspired to build a quantum computer capable of solving complex materials simulation problems beyond the reach of classical computers. D-Wave's advancements in quantum hardware have made it possible for its annealing quantum computers to process these types of problems for the first time. Magnetic materials simulations, like those conducted in this work, use computer models to study how tiny particles not visible to the human eye react to external factors. Magnetic materials are widely used in medical imaging, electronics, superconductors, electrical networks, sensors, and motors. This is an incredibly important achievement. Please join us in congratulating the D-Wave team and our global collaborators on this remarkable milestone. It’s a significant moment for the quantum computing industry. Learn more about this monumental achievement: Read the press release here: #QuantumSupremacy #QuantumRealized #QuantumComputing #DWave #Technology #Innovation #Optimization #MaterialsDiscovery #ScientificBreakthrough $QBTS
3:26

D-Wave announced a scientific breakthrough published in the esteemed journal Science Magazine, confirming that its annealing quantum computer outperformed one of the world’s most powerful classical supercomputers in solving a complex magnetic materials simulation problem with relevance to materials discovery. The new landmark peer-reviewed paper, “Beyond-Classical Computation in Quantum Simulation,” validates this achievement as the world’s first and only demonstration of quantum computational supremacy on a useful problem. An international collaboration of scientists led by D-Wave performed simulations of quantum dynamics in programmable spin glasses—a computationally hard magnetic materials simulation problem with known applications to business and science—on both D-Wave’s Advantage2™ prototype annealing quantum computer and the Frontier supercomputer at the Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge Lab. D-Wave’s quantum computer performed a complex simulation in minutes and with a level of accuracy that would take nearly a million years using the supercomputer. In addition, it would require more than the world’s annual electricity consumption to solve this problem using the supercomputer, which is built with graphics processing unit (GPU) clusters. For decades, scientists have aspired to build a quantum computer capable of solving complex materials simulation problems beyond the reach of classical computers. D-Wave's advancements in quantum hardware have made it possible for its annealing quantum computers to process these types of problems for the first time. Magnetic materials simulations, like those conducted in this work, use computer models to study how tiny particles not visible to the human eye react to external factors. Magnetic materials are widely used in medical imaging, electronics, superconductors, electrical networks, sensors, and motors. This is an incredibly important achievement. Please join us in congratulating the D-Wave team and our global collaborators on this remarkable milestone. It’s a significant moment for the quantum computing industry. Learn more about this monumental achievement: Read the press release here: #QuantumSupremacy #QuantumRealized #QuantumComputing #DWave #Technology #Innovation #Optimization #MaterialsDiscovery #ScientificBreakthrough $QBTS

D-Wave

65,107 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Biden Appointee Claims Non-Binary People Understand Quantum Mechanics Better At Socialism 2025, Chanda Prescod-Weinstein—a physics professor at the University of New Hampshire and Biden appointee to the Department of Energy’s High Energy Physics Advisory Panel, which helps shape federal science funding—offered a unique take on quantum mechanics: “There are good arguments for why, for example, non-binary people find wave-particle duality very straightforward. Yes, you can be both at the same time.” She went on to frame science as a domain for “freedom dreamers” and warned against ceding the field to those “who are like, yeah, I’ll go work for the military.” This is someone with real influence over which science gets funded in America—and who’s also shaping the next generation in the classroom.
0:58

Biden Appointee Claims Non-Binary People Understand Quantum Mechanics Better At Socialism 2025, Chanda Prescod-Weinstein—a physics professor at the University of New Hampshire and Biden appointee to the Department of Energy’s High Energy Physics Advisory Panel, which helps shape federal science funding—offered a unique take on quantum mechanics: “There are good arguments for why, for example, non-binary people find wave-particle duality very straightforward. Yes, you can be both at the same time.” She went on to frame science as a domain for “freedom dreamers” and warned against ceding the field to those “who are like, yeah, I’ll go work for the military.” This is someone with real influence over which science gets funded in America—and who’s also shaping the next generation in the classroom.

Stu Smith

202,662 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Never miss a chance to listen to this man Feynman was a genius. The EPR Paradox Explained: How Einstein Challenged Quantum Mechanics and Bell Proved Him Right The Real Story of Einstein vs Quantum Mechanics - Not What Your Textbook Says. In this video we explain: Einstein, Podolsky & Rosen's 1935 paper - Can Quantum-Mechanical Description Be Considered Complete? Why the EPR Argument is not about God playing dice, but about locality and reality How John Bell's 1964 Theorem made it testable How Alain Aspect's 1982 Experiment proved quantum entanglement is real What Feynman said about this in The Character of Physical Law (1965) Based on original sources: EPR Paper 1935, J.S. Bell 1964, Aspect et al. 1982, Feynman Lectures Vol III 1965. This is the mystery at the heart of quantum physics that is STILL unsolved. Save this for later. This is real physics history.
4:18

Never miss a chance to listen to this man Feynman was a genius. The EPR Paradox Explained: How Einstein Challenged Quantum Mechanics and Bell Proved Him Right The Real Story of Einstein vs Quantum Mechanics - Not What Your Textbook Says. In this video we explain: Einstein, Podolsky & Rosen's 1935 paper - Can Quantum-Mechanical Description Be Considered Complete? Why the EPR Argument is not about God playing dice, but about locality and reality How John Bell's 1964 Theorem made it testable How Alain Aspect's 1982 Experiment proved quantum entanglement is real What Feynman said about this in The Character of Physical Law (1965) Based on original sources: EPR Paper 1935, J.S. Bell 1964, Aspect et al. 1982, Feynman Lectures Vol III 1965. This is the mystery at the heart of quantum physics that is STILL unsolved. Save this for later. This is real physics history.

Matty Dread

66,817 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

🔱IIT Madras professor V. Balakrishnan walks a full classical physics class through the foundations that connect Newton to quantum mechanics - he does it for free. US universities charge over $3,000 per credit to sit in a room and hear this material. Balakrishnan covers more ground in one semester than most Western physics programs fit into two years - and his first lecture alone reframes why classical mechanics matters at all. He opens not with equations but with a question most professors skip: why does classical physics still exist when quantum mechanics replaced it? The answer restructures everything. By the time the introduction ends, you are already inside the mathematical skeleton that connects Newton, Lagrange, Hamilton, and Feynman into one coherent picture. No paywalled syllabus. No overpriced textbook required. Just a blackboard, a professor who clearly spent decades thinking about how to teach this, and a playlist that runs 47 lectures deep. NPTEL filmed the actual university curriculum at 7 Indian Institutes of Technology and put all of it online. Over 3,200 courses, zero subscription. Western institutions have known about this for years and said nothing. ▪ Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics from first principles ▪ Nonlinear dynamics and chaos theory included in the same course ▪ Graduate level, no prerequisites assumed beyond calculus 🔖 Bookmark before the algorithm buries it - this is the kind of content paid platforms charge hundreds of dollars to approximate.
48:53

🔱IIT Madras professor V. Balakrishnan walks a full classical physics class through the foundations that connect Newton to quantum mechanics - he does it for free. US universities charge over $3,000 per credit to sit in a room and hear this material. Balakrishnan covers more ground in one semester than most Western physics programs fit into two years - and his first lecture alone reframes why classical mechanics matters at all. He opens not with equations but with a question most professors skip: why does classical physics still exist when quantum mechanics replaced it? The answer restructures everything. By the time the introduction ends, you are already inside the mathematical skeleton that connects Newton, Lagrange, Hamilton, and Feynman into one coherent picture. No paywalled syllabus. No overpriced textbook required. Just a blackboard, a professor who clearly spent decades thinking about how to teach this, and a playlist that runs 47 lectures deep. NPTEL filmed the actual university curriculum at 7 Indian Institutes of Technology and put all of it online. Over 3,200 courses, zero subscription. Western institutions have known about this for years and said nothing. ▪ Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics from first principles ▪ Nonlinear dynamics and chaos theory included in the same course ▪ Graduate level, no prerequisites assumed beyond calculus 🔖 Bookmark before the algorithm buries it - this is the kind of content paid platforms charge hundreds of dollars to approximate.

Trixi

36,721 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

Today is World Quantum Day! A great reminder that quantum's impact on cryptography isn't theoretical, it's only a matter of time. To mark the occasion, CEO StaciW_DC sat down with world-renowned post-quantum cryptographer and Algorand CSO Chris Peikert to discuss the quantum threat to blockchain. Since 2022, Algorand has been leading in blockchain quantum resilience by securing its entire chain history with Falcon-signed State Proofs. In 2025, we took it further: the first quantum-resistant transaction protecting real digital assets was executed on mainnet. With Google now targeting 2029 for its own post-quantum migration, the urgency is clear. Algorand isn't waiting, we're already building for that future. Watch now! 👇
1:01:56

Today is World Quantum Day! A great reminder that quantum's impact on cryptography isn't theoretical, it's only a matter of time. To mark the occasion, CEO StaciW_DC sat down with world-renowned post-quantum cryptographer and Algorand CSO Chris Peikert to discuss the quantum threat to blockchain. Since 2022, Algorand has been leading in blockchain quantum resilience by securing its entire chain history with Falcon-signed State Proofs. In 2025, we took it further: the first quantum-resistant transaction protecting real digital assets was executed on mainnet. With Google now targeting 2029 for its own post-quantum migration, the urgency is clear. Algorand isn't waiting, we're already building for that future. Watch now! 👇

Algorand Foundation

64,547 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

A NASA fellow claims 5 equations explain 99 percent of the physics that actually runs your world. Understand them deeply and you are set for life. His words. And the way he does it is what makes the video worth it. He does not teach the five as a list. He tells them as one story, where each equation is born from the one before it. F equals ma leads into gravity. Gravity rhymes with the law of electric charge, the exact same shape. That connects to magnetism. Magnetism folds into the wave. And the wave quietly opens the door to relativity and quantum physics. By the end, all of physics feels like a single sentence written by one hand, not a pile of formulas you were forced to memorize. The move that stays with you comes first. He says F equals ma is written the wrong way around, and rewrites it. One tiny flip, and the most famous equation on Earth suddenly means something school never told you. His point for why this matters now: in the age of AI, the people who understand reality itself stay in demand. Everyone else is just memorizing. Five equations. One thread. It is in the video.
17:19

A NASA fellow claims 5 equations explain 99 percent of the physics that actually runs your world. Understand them deeply and you are set for life. His words. And the way he does it is what makes the video worth it. He does not teach the five as a list. He tells them as one story, where each equation is born from the one before it. F equals ma leads into gravity. Gravity rhymes with the law of electric charge, the exact same shape. That connects to magnetism. Magnetism folds into the wave. And the wave quietly opens the door to relativity and quantum physics. By the end, all of physics feels like a single sentence written by one hand, not a pile of formulas you were forced to memorize. The move that stays with you comes first. He says F equals ma is written the wrong way around, and rewrites it. One tiny flip, and the most famous equation on Earth suddenly means something school never told you. His point for why this matters now: in the age of AI, the people who understand reality itself stay in demand. Everyone else is just memorizing. Five equations. One thread. It is in the video.

ooaes

437,699 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Can you program a quantum computer only using pi? To celebrate pi day 2026, in this video I go through the paper "All You Need is pi: Quantum Computing with Hermitian Gates", which shows that you can construct any quantum computing operations out of quantum operations that have the special property of undoing themselves ("Hermitian gates") — and for single-qubit gates, these are entirely made of rotations of an angle of pi! Happy Pi Day 🥧 *Timestamps* 0:00 Intro 1:03 Single qubits & gates 3:11 Gates on many qubits 3:58 Quantum circuit diagrams 4:44 Universal gate set 5:54 Self-reverse gates (Hermitian) 8:08 All you need is pi? 10:14 Decomposing gates 13:14 Hardware pi pulses 14:28 Clocked quantum computers
15:36

Can you program a quantum computer only using pi? To celebrate pi day 2026, in this video I go through the paper "All You Need is pi: Quantum Computing with Hermitian Gates", which shows that you can construct any quantum computing operations out of quantum operations that have the special property of undoing themselves ("Hermitian gates") — and for single-qubit gates, these are entirely made of rotations of an angle of pi! Happy Pi Day 🥧 *Timestamps* 0:00 Intro 1:03 Single qubits & gates 3:11 Gates on many qubits 3:58 Quantum circuit diagrams 4:44 Universal gate set 5:54 Self-reverse gates (Hermitian) 8:08 All you need is pi? 10:14 Decomposing gates 13:14 Hardware pi pulses 14:28 Clocked quantum computers

Dr Maria Violaris

18,022 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten