Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Claude Fable 5 vs Codex 5.6 Sol gave each model the identical prompt: "create nike's member welcome flow, 12 emails, using nitrosend." one shot, no edits. which one's better?

George Hartley ☄️

3,499 subscribers

87,418 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Sanat Bilim & Teknoloji

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Claude Fable 5 vs Codex 5.6 Sol, round 2. identical prompt again: "create a Ferrari 2027 vision email flow, 12 emails, using nitrosend." one shot, no edits. one of these is clearly better imo

Claude Fable 5 vs Codex 5.6 Sol, round 2. identical prompt again: "create a Ferrari 2027 vision email flow, 12 emails, using nitrosend." one shot, no edits. one of these is clearly better imo

George Hartley ☄️

138,128 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5, round 3. same prompt: "create Apple's next launch email flow for a brand new product, 12 emails, using Nitrosend." both of them invented a product Apple doesn't make. Opus 5 is getting rave reviews this week...Opus or Fable here?

George Hartley ☄️

72,308 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

Kling 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0, Which one is better? Every single shot was generated using the exact same base image and identical prompt.

Kling 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0, Which one is better? Every single shot was generated using the exact same base image and identical prompt.

Dinda Prasetyo

87,329 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

wow... GPT 5.6 Sol Passed the Replit Benchmark. In one prompt 5.6 on Codex created a full Replit clone with DB, Sandboxes, and an agent that builds and edits full web apps. Only Fable and GPT 5.6 have passed this benchmark. 5.6 is much better at designing iOS apps than 5.5 as well.

wow... GPT 5.6 Sol Passed the Replit Benchmark. In one prompt 5.6 on Codex created a full Replit clone with DB, Sandboxes, and an agent that builds and edits full web apps. Only Fable and GPT 5.6 have passed this benchmark. 5.6 is much better at designing iOS apps than 5.5 as well.

Riley Brown

123,242 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce

This test shows clearly why GPT 5.6 Sol wins I asked the simplest prompt ever : > Create a gmail clone, the nearest possible to the real gmail ui You can see the result, GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable make a 100% perfect But here's the price difference: → GPT 5.6 Terra: $1.04 - 8 minutes → GPT 5.6 Luna: $0.44 - 10 minutes → GPT 5.6 Sol: $6.72 - 20 minutes → Claude Fable 5: $25.09 - 40 minutes Fable is 3.7x more expensive than Sol for "the same result"

This test shows clearly why GPT 5.6 Sol wins I asked the simplest prompt ever : > Create a gmail clone, the nearest possible to the real gmail ui You can see the result, GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable make a 100% perfect But here's the price difference: → GPT 5.6 Terra: $1.04 - 8 minutes → GPT 5.6 Luna: $0.44 - 10 minutes → GPT 5.6 Sol: $6.72 - 20 minutes → Claude Fable 5: $25.09 - 40 minutes Fable is 3.7x more expensive than Sol for "the same result"

Melvyn • Builder

22,212 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

We are officially in the era where one prompt can ship a complete playable game in <50 bucks! Asked Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol to clone Terraria, max effort level Both are playable and offer a smooth experience GPT 5.6 Sol did it at roughly 1/4 the cost and in 2/3 the runtime: - GPT 5.6 Sol: ~$35, ~1h 20m - Claude Fable 5: ~$120, ~2h Tho Fable still produced the strongest results 🥲

We are officially in the era where one prompt can ship a complete playable game in <50 bucks! Asked Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol to clone Terraria, max effort level Both are playable and offer a smooth experience GPT 5.6 Sol did it at roughly 1/4 the cost and in 2/3 the runtime: - GPT 5.6 Sol: ~$35, ~1h 20m - Claude Fable 5: ~$120, ~2h Tho Fable still produced the strongest results 🥲

GMI Cloud

127,195 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

this is f**king gold someone just figured out how to run Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol in the same loop gpt-5.6 came out yesterday. fable 5 leaves in 48 hours. this window has never existed before and never will again. here is how to use it: 1. open claude code. install openai's codex plugin 2. type /model. choose fable 5. 3. drop one ROUTING.md in your repo root (full file in comments). 4.paste the prompt (in comments), write what feature you want. boom. save and bookmark this no matter what. it will be the most productive thing you do this weekend

this is f**king gold someone just figured out how to run Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol in the same loop gpt-5.6 came out yesterday. fable 5 leaves in 48 hours. this window has never existed before and never will again. here is how to use it: 1. open claude code. install openai's codex plugin 2. type /model. choose fable 5. 3. drop one ROUTING.md in your repo root (full file in comments). 4.paste the prompt (in comments), write what feature you want. boom. save and bookmark this no matter what. it will be the most productive thing you do this weekend

Avid

139,979 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce

this is f**king insane Fable 5 goes away in 24 hours from Claude Code and someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in GPT 5.6 Sol with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Go the Codex App > Settings > Personalisation > Custom Instructions 3) Use GPT 5.5 / GPT 5.6 and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/3 th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

this is f**king insane Fable 5 goes away in 24 hours from Claude Code and someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in GPT 5.6 Sol with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Go the Codex App > Settings > Personalisation > Custom Instructions 3) Use GPT 5.5 / GPT 5.6 and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/3 th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

Avid

57,544 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

Gave a random doodle to Kimi K3, Fable 5, Opus 5, GPT-5.6 Sol and asked them to finish the drawing 🎨 The only rule: make it as creative as possible. Here are the results 👇 Which one do you like most?

Gave a random doodle to Kimi K3, Fable 5, Opus 5, GPT-5.6 Sol and asked them to finish the drawing 🎨 The only rule: make it as creative as possible. Here are the results 👇 Which one do you like most?

TypingMind

285,184 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce

I gave 4 frontier models the same prompt to create an Ecco the Dolphin style video game 100% procedural 🐬 Same task, official chat UIs, max thinking. Watch 👇 Claude Fable 5 Z.ai GLM 5.2 ChatGPT GPT 5.5 Pro Google Gemini Flash 3.5 Note: Fable 5 version was created before the model was restricted.

I gave 4 frontier models the same prompt to create an Ecco the Dolphin style video game 100% procedural 🐬 Same task, official chat UIs, max thinking. Watch 👇 Claude Fable 5 Z.ai GLM 5.2 ChatGPT GPT 5.5 Pro Google Gemini Flash 3.5 Note: Fable 5 version was created before the model was restricted.

Majid Manzarpour

42,774 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

If you're a trader still not using AI you're f*ckd. We connected Claude Fable-5 and GPT Sol 5.6 to the entire stock market and gave it a virtual machine to go wild. Insane levels of alpha have been generated thus far. Heres how it works:

If you're a trader still not using AI you're f*ckd. We connected Claude Fable-5 and GPT Sol 5.6 to the entire stock market and gave it a virtual machine to go wild. Insane levels of alpha have been generated thus far. Heres how it works:

Xynth

488,640 görüntüleme • 18 gün önce

Seedance 2.0 vs. Kling 3.0: Who delivers the most realistic emotional expressions? I put both models through the same test using one character, one reference image, and the exact same prompt. Each generated four emotions: anger, sadness, happiness, and disgust. Which AI video model handled the emotions better ?

Seedance 2.0 vs. Kling 3.0: Who delivers the most realistic emotional expressions? I put both models through the same test using one character, one reference image, and the exact same prompt. Each generated four emotions: anger, sadness, happiness, and disgust. Which AI video model handled the emotions better ?

FATHELA ESQ

38,646 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,206 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 DeepSeek V4 GA vs Fable 5 I gave both models the exact same 3D game generation prompt The results surprised me In my test, DeepSeek V4 GA produced the stronger output > Better environment generation > Stronger implementation > Excellent price-to-performance Which one do you prefer? 👇

🚨 DeepSeek V4 GA vs Fable 5 I gave both models the exact same 3D game generation prompt The results surprised me In my test, DeepSeek V4 GA produced the stronger output > Better environment generation > Stronger implementation > Excellent price-to-performance Which one do you prefer? 👇

Salio

30,681 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

This is our second head-to-head test between Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0. This time, we pushed both models further, including dialogue-driven Sci-fi comedy shots and even a singing scene. Every single shot was generated using: • The exact same base image • The exact same prompt • No re-generate • No second attempt • No prompt refinements. What you see is the pure first output from each model under identical conditions. So… which one performs better? Seedance 2.0 generated by Ilham Setyawan on BytePlus

This is our second head-to-head test between Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0. This time, we pushed both models further, including dialogue-driven Sci-fi comedy shots and even a singing scene. Every single shot was generated using: • The exact same base image • The exact same prompt • No re-generate • No second attempt • No prompt refinements. What you see is the pure first output from each model under identical conditions. So… which one performs better? Seedance 2.0 generated by Ilham Setyawan on BytePlus

Dinda Prasetyo

196,557 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

GPT-5.6 Sol just changed how I build websites with AI. In this full 10-minute video, I test Sol and Terra inside Codex to build a cinematic landing page from a video reference. I cover: → Which GPT-5.6 model to use → How I analyze a full website experience → How I recreate the layout, motion and interactions → Why better prompting matters more than one-shot results → How to avoid generic AI slop The model matters—but the way you guide it matters even more. Watch the full process below 👇 Want the free template and the exact prompt I used? They’re available exclusively in the description of the YouTube version:

GPT-5.6 Sol just changed how I build websites with AI. In this full 10-minute video, I test Sol and Terra inside Codex to build a cinematic landing page from a video reference. I cover: → Which GPT-5.6 model to use → How I analyze a full website experience → How I recreate the layout, motion and interactions → Why better prompting matters more than one-shot results → How to avoid generic AI slop The model matters—but the way you guide it matters even more. Watch the full process below 👇 Want the free template and the exact prompt I used? They’re available exclusively in the description of the YouTube version:

Sourasith

261,047 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 5 and ChatGPT 5.6 Sol were asked to paint the Mona Lisa in a browser, and all three rebuilt Leonardo's actual 500 year old technique on their own. The entire prompt was one line: "Create a single HTML file that animates the painting of the Mona Lisa layer by layer, the way an old master would build it up". Nobody told them how oil painting works, they just knew.. > Charcoal study, umber ground, shadow and atmosphere, color glazing, sfumato, varnished finish -- the exact Renaissance layering order, and not one of those words was in the prompt. > GPT 5.6 Sol went furthest and named its own app Sfumato Studio, with a completion counter, playback speed and a restart button. The models are no longer copying the result -> they are copying the process. Save this one -- the prompt is right there, go repaint your own ↓

Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 5 and ChatGPT 5.6 Sol were asked to paint the Mona Lisa in a browser, and all three rebuilt Leonardo's actual 500 year old technique on their own. The entire prompt was one line: "Create a single HTML file that animates the painting of the Mona Lisa layer by layer, the way an old master would build it up". Nobody told them how oil painting works, they just knew.. > Charcoal study, umber ground, shadow and atmosphere, color glazing, sfumato, varnished finish -- the exact Renaissance layering order, and not one of those words was in the prompt. > GPT 5.6 Sol went furthest and named its own app Sfumato Studio, with a completion counter, playback speed and a restart button. The models are no longer copying the result -> they are copying the process. Save this one -- the prompt is right there, go repaint your own ↓

slash1s

652,660 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

Claude Opus 5 just one-shotted this FPS. Less than 1 hour from prompt to playable demo. Every weapon, enemy, mechanic and environment was generated from scratch. Prompt below 👇 There is no prompt below, because the first section is exactly the kind of post I’m tired of seeing every time a new model drops. A flashy demo, “one-shot” in the caption, “built in under an hour”… anything to farm impressions while conveniently hiding the actual process. If it was really made from a single prompt, show the prompt. That’s what I do on this account. When I claim something is a one-prompt prototype built with GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra and Codex, I share the prompt publicly so anyone can verify it. AI is already making game prototyping incredible. We don’t need fake “one-shot” stories to prove it. Original footage:

Claude Opus 5 just one-shotted this FPS. Less than 1 hour from prompt to playable demo. Every weapon, enemy, mechanic and environment was generated from scratch. Prompt below 👇 There is no prompt below, because the first section is exactly the kind of post I’m tired of seeing every time a new model drops. A flashy demo, “one-shot” in the caption, “built in under an hour”… anything to farm impressions while conveniently hiding the actual process. If it was really made from a single prompt, show the prompt. That’s what I do on this account. When I claim something is a one-prompt prototype built with GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra and Codex, I share the prompt publicly so anyone can verify it. AI is already making game prototyping incredible. We don’t need fake “one-shot” stories to prove it. Original footage:

Givros

14,794 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce

We've spent six figures in tokens testing OpenAI's 5.6 Sol model to see whether if its better than Fable and what OpenAI have done to make it even better than 5.5. 02:38 - Intro 04:10 - What Is this New Model 07:17 - First Impressions 16:38 - The Code-Quality gap 26:38 - OpenAI's Naming Problem 29:38 - The Complicated Release 32:08 - Loops & Subagents 38:28 - macOS is killing your machine 46:28 - Claude Code vs Codex Subagent UX 1:03:19 - The Pottery Analogy 1:09:33 - cispolicyd CPU Usage

We've spent six figures in tokens testing OpenAI's 5.6 Sol model to see whether if its better than Fable and what OpenAI have done to make it even better than 5.5. 02:38 - Intro 04:10 - What Is this New Model 07:17 - First Impressions 16:38 - The Code-Quality gap 26:38 - OpenAI's Naming Problem 29:38 - The Complicated Release 32:08 - Loops & Subagents 38:28 - macOS is killing your machine 46:28 - Claude Code vs Codex Subagent UX 1:03:19 - The Pottery Analogy 1:09:33 - cispolicyd CPU Usage

Nerd Snipe

84,148 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

Claude Code with Sonnet 4.5 is actually incredible I gave it a prompt for a super complex app, and it one shot the entire thing In this video I walk you through how to use Claude Code to build a prompt library app you can start using immediately (no coding experience required):

Claude Code with Sonnet 4.5 is actually incredible I gave it a prompt for a super complex app, and it one shot the entire thing In this video I walk you through how to use Claude Code to build a prompt library app you can start using immediately (no coding experience required):

Alex Finn

40,955 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce