Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Kling 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0, Which one is better? Every single shot was generated using the exact same base image and identical prompt.

heydin_ai's profile picture

Dinda Prasetyo

6,666 subscribers

87,349 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

KunstWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

This is our second head-to-head test between Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0. This time, we pushed both models further, including dialogue-driven Sci-fi comedy shots and even a singing scene. Every single shot was generated using: • The exact same base image • The exact same prompt • No re-generate • No second attempt • No prompt refinements. What you see is the pure first output from each model under identical conditions. So… which one performs better? Seedance 2.0 generated by Ilham Setyawan on BytePlus
3:30

This is our second head-to-head test between Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0. This time, we pushed both models further, including dialogue-driven Sci-fi comedy shots and even a singing scene. Every single shot was generated using: • The exact same base image • The exact same prompt • No re-generate • No second attempt • No prompt refinements. What you see is the pure first output from each model under identical conditions. So… which one performs better? Seedance 2.0 generated by Ilham Setyawan on BytePlus

Dinda Prasetyo

196,658 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Seedance 2.0 vs. Kling 3.0: Who delivers the most realistic emotional expressions? I put both models through the same test using one character, one reference image, and the exact same prompt. Each generated four emotions: anger, sadness, happiness, and disgust. Which AI video model handled the emotions better ?
0:28

Seedance 2.0 vs. Kling 3.0: Who delivers the most realistic emotional expressions? I put both models through the same test using one character, one reference image, and the exact same prompt. Each generated four emotions: anger, sadness, happiness, and disgust. Which AI video model handled the emotions better ?

FATHELA ESQ

38,646 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The Ultimate Creation Debate Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0 Same prompt. Same image. Both platforms can now generate an entire story from just ONE IMAGE. That’s a huge step forward. Comment Seedance or Kling. DM me if you want the prompt. #AIvideo #Seedance #KlingAI #GenerativeAI #AItools #AIcreator
1:10

The Ultimate Creation Debate Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0 Same prompt. Same image. Both platforms can now generate an entire story from just ONE IMAGE. That’s a huge step forward. Comment Seedance or Kling. DM me if you want the prompt. #AIvideo #Seedance #KlingAI #GenerativeAI #AItools #AIcreator

erich3D.com

11,335 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

You can generate a 30-second short film in one shot using a single prompt and image references. Generated using Seedance 2.5 on Runway. Prompt ⤵️
0:30

You can generate a 30-second short film in one shot using a single prompt and image references. Generated using Seedance 2.5 on Runway. Prompt ⤵️

Umesh

35,904 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

Flux 3 vs. Seedance 2.0 🥊 Same exact prompt. Completely different interpretation. Left or Right — which one nailed it? 👇
0:20

Flux 3 vs. Seedance 2.0 🥊 Same exact prompt. Completely different interpretation. Left or Right — which one nailed it? 👇

TopviewAI

15,311 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The biggest AI model showdown is here. 🚀 Kling 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0 vs Sora 2 vs VEO 3.1 One prompt. Four models. Who delivers the best results? Cast your vote 👇
0:40

The biggest AI model showdown is here. 🚀 Kling 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0 vs Sora 2 vs VEO 3.1 One prompt. Four models. Who delivers the best results? Cast your vote 👇

WaveSpeedAI

157,333 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:
0:45

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:

hedoήist

43,990 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Still choosing the right AI video model? You don’t have to. Same prompt. Kling 3.0. Seedance 2.0. StarDream 2.0. Different strengths. Different results. All in one place — SeaArt
0:32

Still choosing the right AI video model? You don’t have to. Same prompt. Kling 3.0. Seedance 2.0. StarDream 2.0. Different strengths. Different results. All in one place — SeaArt

SeaArt.Ai🐋

22,771 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Comparing Seedance 2.0 vs. Kling 3.0 Turbo Which one wins your workflow? Dropping my full initial review in the comments soon!
3:00

Comparing Seedance 2.0 vs. Kling 3.0 Turbo Which one wins your workflow? Dropping my full initial review in the comments soon!

JSFILMZ

29,258 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Compared the same prompt in Veo 3.1, Kling 3.0, and Seedance 2.0 and got this result Look at the differences in how they render the punch impact Which model do you think did well? Prompt in the comments
0:26

Compared the same prompt in Veo 3.1, Kling 3.0, and Seedance 2.0 and got this result Look at the differences in how they render the punch impact Which model do you think did well? Prompt in the comments

Fathela Esq

20,681 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

SEEDANCE 2 vs FAST vs MINI Seedance 2.0 mini just went live on CapCut and I tested the exact same storyboard for reference and prompt to see which one performs best. And the difference is actually crazy 😳 Which one do you think came out on top? 👀 #CapcutSeedance2
0:45

SEEDANCE 2 vs FAST vs MINI Seedance 2.0 mini just went live on CapCut and I tested the exact same storyboard for reference and prompt to see which one performs best. And the difference is actually crazy 😳 Which one do you think came out on top? 👀 #CapcutSeedance2

MrDejie

133,840 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I tested Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0. The winner was obvious. Same prompt, same reference image, one scene: a boy rescuing his dog from an oncoming car. Seedance 2.0 came out ahead across the board: · Better character consistency — the boy's face and expression stayed recognizable through fast, dynamic motion. · More coherent physics — when the boy dives to save the dog, he actually lands on the other side of the road. In Kling 3.0, they just drop in place, which breaks the logic of the scene. · More natural motion — fluid movements without the exaggerated, theatrical quality that plagues most AI video. · Richer cinematic language — varied shot compositions including close-ups, camera transitions, and framing shifts that actively reinforce emotion and narrative tension. The gap suggests Seedance 2.0's training leans heavier into film language, not just motion synthesis.
0:20

I tested Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0. The winner was obvious. Same prompt, same reference image, one scene: a boy rescuing his dog from an oncoming car. Seedance 2.0 came out ahead across the board: · Better character consistency — the boy's face and expression stayed recognizable through fast, dynamic motion. · More coherent physics — when the boy dives to save the dog, he actually lands on the other side of the road. In Kling 3.0, they just drop in place, which breaks the logic of the scene. · More natural motion — fluid movements without the exaggerated, theatrical quality that plagues most AI video. · Richer cinematic language — varied shot compositions including close-ups, camera transitions, and framing shifts that actively reinforce emotion and narrative tension. The gap suggests Seedance 2.0's training leans heavier into film language, not just motion synthesis.

Latte

167,558 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

I had early access to Kling 3.0. This short film is called MIRA. Every shot came from one single start image, using Kling’s new custom multi-shot feature. This changes how films get made. More below 👇
5:52

I had early access to Kling 3.0. This short film is called MIRA. Every shot came from one single start image, using Kling’s new custom multi-shot feature. This changes how films get made. More below 👇

Dave Clark

350,028 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Claude Fable 5 vs Codex 5.6 Sol gave each model the identical prompt: "create nike's member welcome flow, 12 emails, using nitrosend." one shot, no edits. which one's better?
0:59

Claude Fable 5 vs Codex 5.6 Sol gave each model the identical prompt: "create nike's member welcome flow, 12 emails, using nitrosend." one shot, no edits. which one's better?

George Hartley ☄️

92,477 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Most AI action clips feels like it was made by the same model on repeat. These 7 don’t. Every single one was generated with Seedance 2.0 in LTX. Different tones, different shot design, zero repetition. Grab the prompts below 🧵
1:21

Most AI action clips feels like it was made by the same model on repeat. These 7 don’t. Every single one was generated with Seedance 2.0 in LTX. Different tones, different shot design, zero repetition. Grab the prompts below 🧵

TechHalla

33,887 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Higgsfield Plugin is officially in the ChatGPT app. Generate with Seedance 2.5, Seedance 2.0, Seedream 5.0 Pro, GPT Image 2.0, and Kling 3.0 without leaving the chat. The Faceless Channel, Narrator, and Subtitles skills are already live inside it.
0:58

Higgsfield Plugin is officially in the ChatGPT app. Generate with Seedance 2.5, Seedance 2.0, Seedream 5.0 Pro, GPT Image 2.0, and Kling 3.0 without leaving the chat. The Faceless Channel, Narrator, and Subtitles skills are already live inside it.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

412,528 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

I ran a quick test: I used the exact same prompt to generate videos with Seedance 2.0 and Sora 2, just to see how they differ. Sora 2 automatically adds music, which instantly makes the video feel polished. But Seedance 2.0 handles shot breakdown and pacing better, it feels more like a professionally edited sequence.
0:30

I ran a quick test: I used the exact same prompt to generate videos with Seedance 2.0 and Sora 2, just to see how they differ. Sora 2 automatically adds music, which instantly makes the video feel polished. But Seedance 2.0 handles shot breakdown and pacing better, it feels more like a professionally edited sequence.

underwood

13,972 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

What Kling 3.0 & Seedance 2.0, two Chinese AI video models, created using the same prompts. We are in an era that everyone can make a film.
1:01

What Kling 3.0 & Seedance 2.0, two Chinese AI video models, created using the same prompts. We are in an era that everyone can make a film.

Li Zexin 李泽欣

14,467 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

FIRST TEST Seedance 2.0! From my initial tests, this is one of the more impressive AI video models I’ve tried so far. Dynamic motion feels fluid, prompt adherence is solid, and the efficiency really stood out, very little iteration needed. Everything you see here was generated using just one reference image + one prompt. I also tested a 3×3 image grid with no prompt at all, and the results stayed surprisingly consistent. Another highlight: sound design is already included, and it actually works really well. Tested via BytePlus 👉 More detail and access link to try Seedance 2.0 is in the comments.
1:34

FIRST TEST Seedance 2.0! From my initial tests, this is one of the more impressive AI video models I’ve tried so far. Dynamic motion feels fluid, prompt adherence is solid, and the efficiency really stood out, very little iteration needed. Everything you see here was generated using just one reference image + one prompt. I also tested a 3×3 image grid with no prompt at all, and the results stayed surprisingly consistent. Another highlight: sound design is already included, and it actually works really well. Tested via BytePlus 👉 More detail and access link to try Seedance 2.0 is in the comments.

Dinda Prasetyo

45,450 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Generated with Seedance 2.0 from a single prompt. Hollywood isn’t the future of filmmaking. Creators are.
2:46

Generated with Seedance 2.0 from a single prompt. Hollywood isn’t the future of filmmaking. Creators are.

EpicNNG

33,773 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten