正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says he'd consider a "non-profit" structure for the future of the project: "Instead of a company, I would much rather consider a foundation, or something that is non-profit." "I want it to be accessible and free. Ultimately, code is not worth that much anymore.... show more

TBPN

231,281 subscribers

84,733 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

.Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Clawdbot represents a "liberation of data that big tech probably doesn't really want" because it effectively neutralizes its walled gardens. "The demand for the old models has to change. When you are a company, and you want to access Gmail, the amount of red tape is so large that startups have to buy other startups that have the license for Gmail." "But if you run it locally, you work around all of that. I've built plenty of CLIs where I literally pointed Codex at the website and said, 'Build me a CLI.'" "It's the liberation of data that big tech probably doesn't really want. Even the WhatsApp integration is a hack."

.Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Clawdbot represents a "liberation of data that big tech probably doesn't really want" because it effectively neutralizes its walled gardens. "The demand for the old models has to change. When you are a company, and you want to access Gmail, the amount of red tape is so large that startups have to buy other startups that have the license for Gmail." "But if you run it locally, you work around all of that. I've built plenty of CLIs where I literally pointed Codex at the website and said, 'Build me a CLI.'" "It's the liberation of data that big tech probably doesn't really want. Even the WhatsApp integration is a hack."

TBPN

21,117 次观看 • 5 个月前

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."

TBPN

442,659 次观看 • 5 个月前

Elon has been remarkably consistent on OpenAI’s non-profit structure. Elon Musk in 2016: “With a few others, I created OpenAI. It's a non-profit. The governance structure here is important because you want to make sure there is not some fiduciary duty to generate profit off of the AI technology."

Elon has been remarkably consistent on OpenAI’s non-profit structure. Elon Musk in 2016: “With a few others, I created OpenAI. It's a non-profit. The governance structure here is important because you want to make sure there is not some fiduciary duty to generate profit off of the AI technology."

Katie Miller

22,790 次观看 • 2 个月前

Sam Altman says OpenAI moved from a non-profit to a for-profit structure because they needed "vastly more capital than we were able to attract as a non-profit" because of the necessity of scaling compute: "we really underestimated how much we needed to scale them"

Sam Altman says OpenAI moved from a non-profit to a for-profit structure because they needed "vastly more capital than we were able to attract as a non-profit" because of the necessity of scaling compute: "we really underestimated how much we needed to scale them"

Tsarathustra

18,749 次观看 • 1 年前

Morgan Stanley recently reported that the amount of debt tied to AI is $1.2 trillion, with OpenAI at the center of the spend. But what's worth understanding is who is actually on the hook for the debt. It's not OpenAI, which has largely avoided tying the debt to its for- and non-profit entities, and as a result can aggressively expand without the burden of taking on high initial costs. Our discussion 👇

Morgan Stanley recently reported that the amount of debt tied to AI is $1.2 trillion, with OpenAI at the center of the spend. But what's worth understanding is who is actually on the hook for the debt. It's not OpenAI, which has largely avoided tying the debt to its for- and non-profit entities, and as a result can aggressively expand without the burden of taking on high initial costs. Our discussion 👇

TBPN

85,041 次观看 • 8 个月前

Notion's Head of Product Max Schoening : "I actually don't care at all whether designers write code that lands in production. The reason I like designers thinking in code is that it forces you to consider the medium. I would much rather take a designer or PM who has a deep affinity for understanding how agent loops work than someone who can ship PRs. And the only way that you can actually get to understanding agent loops is by building them in the material that they're made of, which is currently code. That's why I care that designers 'code.' Not because of the utility of shipping to production, but because it forces you to really interrogate the material that you're designing with."

Notion's Head of Product Max Schoening : "I actually don't care at all whether designers write code that lands in production. The reason I like designers thinking in code is that it forces you to consider the medium. I would much rather take a designer or PM who has a deep affinity for understanding how agent loops work than someone who can ship PRs. And the only way that you can actually get to understanding agent loops is by building them in the material that they're made of, which is currently code. That's why I care that designers 'code.' Not because of the utility of shipping to production, but because it forces you to really interrogate the material that you're designing with."

Lenny Rachitsky

76,242 次观看 • 2 个月前

Elon Musk: Let's say you fund a non-profit to preserve the Amazon rainforest, but instead they chop down trees to sell the wood. That's OpenAI. “I came up with the name OpenAI as an open source and as a nonprofit and I funded OpenAI for the first roughly $50 million. And it was intended to be a nonprofit open-source company. And now, they're trying to change that for their own financial benefit into a for-profit company that is closed source. So this would be like, let's say you funded a non-profit to help preserve the Amazon rainforest, but instead of doing that, they became a lumber company, chopped down the forest and sold the wood. You'd be like, wait a second, that's not what I funded. That's OpenAI.” Interview at the Qatar Economic Forum, May 20, 2025

Elon Musk: Let's say you fund a non-profit to preserve the Amazon rainforest, but instead they chop down trees to sell the wood. That's OpenAI. “I came up with the name OpenAI as an open source and as a nonprofit and I funded OpenAI for the first roughly $50 million. And it was intended to be a nonprofit open-source company. And now, they're trying to change that for their own financial benefit into a for-profit company that is closed source. So this would be like, let's say you funded a non-profit to help preserve the Amazon rainforest, but instead of doing that, they became a lumber company, chopped down the forest and sold the wood. You'd be like, wait a second, that's not what I funded. That's OpenAI.” Interview at the Qatar Economic Forum, May 20, 2025

ELON CLIPS

22,370 次观看 • 8 个月前

Ginkgo Bioworks CEO Jason Kelly says GLP-1s are opening the door for biotech to do more in wellness and longevity, rather than only serving the disease industry: “If you think about the pharmaceutical industry today, it’s basically the disease industry. How much of your life are you sick? For the average person, not that much.” “How much of your life would you like to feel better? Sleep better? Have more muscles?” “If you had something that added muscle mass annually in your 60s - that’s another GLP-1. That’s a multi-trillion-dollar drug. If you have something that adds a year to lifespan, what’s it worth?” “The pathway to apply all of this to wellness is much more muddy and unclear. How do you get FDA approval? There are lots of barriers. We haven’t thrown the full horsepower of biotechnology against that problem - we’ve only thrown it at disease. I think that needs to change.”

Ginkgo Bioworks CEO Jason Kelly says GLP-1s are opening the door for biotech to do more in wellness and longevity, rather than only serving the disease industry: “If you think about the pharmaceutical industry today, it’s basically the disease industry. How much of your life are you sick? For the average person, not that much.” “How much of your life would you like to feel better? Sleep better? Have more muscles?” “If you had something that added muscle mass annually in your 60s - that’s another GLP-1. That’s a multi-trillion-dollar drug. If you have something that adds a year to lifespan, what’s it worth?” “The pathway to apply all of this to wellness is much more muddy and unclear. How do you get FDA approval? There are lots of barriers. We haven’t thrown the full horsepower of biotechnology against that problem - we’ve only thrown it at disease. I think that needs to change.”

TBPN

10,779 次观看 • 4 个月前

OpenClaw could be joining Meta or OpenAI Peter Steinberger 🦞 says these are the two offers that seemed most interesting, and that it would be under the condition that project stays open source

OpenClaw could be joining Meta or OpenAI Peter Steinberger 🦞 says these are the two offers that seemed most interesting, and that it would be under the condition that project stays open source

Jason

242,921 次观看 • 4 个月前

Airbnb's Brian Chesky says there's still a massive opportunity in consumer AI, if only because almost every AI company is an enterprise/ coding company. "Almost every AI company is an enterprise company. The last stat I said on TBPN, like three months ago — and the stats haven't changed — was 175 companies in a YC batch, and 16 were consumer." "That trend hasn't changed. Almost everyone's going into coding and enterprise." "But the consumer [AI] experience hasn't fundamentally changed that much beyond a chatbot. I think the consumer is a massive opportunity for AI. I think it's going to need to be a richer user interface." "AI today is text, photos, and buttons. And some videos. And I think there's a breakthrough visual paradigm that could be much more immersive. With the new image and video models, you could do something so much more immersive."

Airbnb's Brian Chesky says there's still a massive opportunity in consumer AI, if only because almost every AI company is an enterprise/ coding company. "Almost every AI company is an enterprise company. The last stat I said on TBPN, like three months ago — and the stats haven't changed — was 175 companies in a YC batch, and 16 were consumer." "That trend hasn't changed. Almost everyone's going into coding and enterprise." "But the consumer [AI] experience hasn't fundamentally changed that much beyond a chatbot. I think the consumer is a massive opportunity for AI. I think it's going to need to be a richer user interface." "AI today is text, photos, and buttons. And some videos. And I think there's a breakthrough visual paradigm that could be much more immersive. With the new image and video models, you could do something so much more immersive."

TBPN

15,372 次观看 • 1 个月前

Elon Musk: Our squabbles on Earth are very minor when you consider the grandness of the universe. “It's awe-inspiring to consider just how tiny we are in the grand scheme of things. And yet we often get sort of caught up in the sort of these sort of squabbles on Earth that are really very sort of minor things when you consider the grandness of the universe. And so I think it is important actually to consider the grandness of the universe and what we can do that is much greater than what we've done before, as opposed to worry about sort of small squabbles on Earth. There's not much point in that. We want to be a civilization that expands to the galaxy with spaceships that anyone can go anywhere they want and at any time that would be epic. And have a city on the moon, cities on Mars, populate the solar system and send spaceships to other star systems. That sounds like the best possible future.” From: Terafab announcement, March 21, 2026

Elon Musk: Our squabbles on Earth are very minor when you consider the grandness of the universe. “It's awe-inspiring to consider just how tiny we are in the grand scheme of things. And yet we often get sort of caught up in the sort of these sort of squabbles on Earth that are really very sort of minor things when you consider the grandness of the universe. And so I think it is important actually to consider the grandness of the universe and what we can do that is much greater than what we've done before, as opposed to worry about sort of small squabbles on Earth. There's not much point in that. We want to be a civilization that expands to the galaxy with spaceships that anyone can go anywhere they want and at any time that would be epic. And have a city on the moon, cities on Mars, populate the solar system and send spaceships to other star systems. That sounds like the best possible future.” From: Terafab announcement, March 21, 2026

ELON CLIPS

19,230 次观看 • 3 个月前

Elon Musk Elon Musk, who co-founded and invested in an open source, non-profit OpenAI ~$50 million: I AM THE REASON OpenAI EXISTS “I am the reason OpenAI exists... I used to be a close friend with Larry Page, and I was staying at his house, and we'd have these conversations long into the evening about AI, and I would be constantly urging him to be careful about the danger of AI. And he was really not concerned about the danger of AI and was quite cavalier about it. And at the time, Google, especially after the acquisition of DeepMind, had three-quarters of the world's AI talent; they had a lot of computers, a lot of money, so it was a unipolar world for AI. And we got a unipolar world, but the person who controls that does not, or at least did not seem to be concerned about AI safety. That sounded like a real problem. The final straw was Larry calling me a speciest for being a pro-human consciousness instead of machine consciousness, and I like, 'Well, yes, I guess I am a speciest.' I came up with the name [OpenAI], which refers to open source. The intent was to what is the opposite of Google, would be an open source non-profit, because Google is closed source profit, and that profit motivation could be dangerous... It does seem weird that something can be a nonprofit, open source, and somehow transform itself into a for-profit, closed source. I mean, this would be like, let's say you founded the organization to save the Amazon rainforest, but instead, they became a lumber company and chopped down the forest and sold it for money. And you'd be, therefore, like, 'Wait a second, that's the exact opposite of what I gave the money for. Is that legal?' That doesn't seem legal. And if, in general, it is legal to start a company as a non-profit and then take the IP and transfer it to a for-profit that then makes tons of money, shouldn't everyone start? Shouldn't that be the default? And I also think it is important to understand, like when push comes to shove, let's say they do create some digital super intelligence, almost Godlike intelligence, well, who is in control, and what is exactly the relationship between OpenAI and Microsoft? And I do worry that Microsoft actually may be more in control than the leadership team at OpenAI realizes. I mean, Microsoft, as part of Microsoft Investment, has rights to all of the software, all of the model weights, and everything necessary to run the inference system. At any point, Microsoft could cut off OpenAI.”

Elon Musk Elon Musk, who co-founded and invested in an open source, non-profit OpenAI ~$50 million: I AM THE REASON OpenAI EXISTS “I am the reason OpenAI exists... I used to be a close friend with Larry Page, and I was staying at his house, and we'd have these conversations long into the evening about AI, and I would be constantly urging him to be careful about the danger of AI. And he was really not concerned about the danger of AI and was quite cavalier about it. And at the time, Google, especially after the acquisition of DeepMind, had three-quarters of the world's AI talent; they had a lot of computers, a lot of money, so it was a unipolar world for AI. And we got a unipolar world, but the person who controls that does not, or at least did not seem to be concerned about AI safety. That sounded like a real problem. The final straw was Larry calling me a speciest for being a pro-human consciousness instead of machine consciousness, and I like, 'Well, yes, I guess I am a speciest.' I came up with the name [OpenAI], which refers to open source. The intent was to what is the opposite of Google, would be an open source non-profit, because Google is closed source profit, and that profit motivation could be dangerous... It does seem weird that something can be a nonprofit, open source, and somehow transform itself into a for-profit, closed source. I mean, this would be like, let's say you founded the organization to save the Amazon rainforest, but instead, they became a lumber company and chopped down the forest and sold it for money. And you'd be, therefore, like, 'Wait a second, that's the exact opposite of what I gave the money for. Is that legal?' That doesn't seem legal. And if, in general, it is legal to start a company as a non-profit and then take the IP and transfer it to a for-profit that then makes tons of money, shouldn't everyone start? Shouldn't that be the default? And I also think it is important to understand, like when push comes to shove, let's say they do create some digital super intelligence, almost Godlike intelligence, well, who is in control, and what is exactly the relationship between OpenAI and Microsoft? And I do worry that Microsoft actually may be more in control than the leadership team at OpenAI realizes. I mean, Microsoft, as part of Microsoft Investment, has rights to all of the software, all of the model weights, and everything necessary to run the inference system. At any point, Microsoft could cut off OpenAI.”

Eva Fo𝕏 🦊 Claudius Nero's Legion

527,742 次观看 • 5 个月前

Databricks’ Arsalan Tavakoli says anyone claiming you can just vibe code any software you need isn’t actually in the business of using software in production. “Build is easy - maintaining and sustaining it is hard.” “If I can, I’d much rather buy than build.” “For things like my CRM - that is not something that, if I can help it, I’m looking to build internally. I’m happy to use something externally, given that I imagine my needs are similar to many other ones, and there should be things that could meet those needs pretty quickly.”

Databricks’ Arsalan Tavakoli says anyone claiming you can just vibe code any software you need isn’t actually in the business of using software in production. “Build is easy - maintaining and sustaining it is hard.” “If I can, I’d much rather buy than build.” “For things like my CRM - that is not something that, if I can help it, I’m looking to build internally. I’m happy to use something externally, given that I imagine my needs are similar to many other ones, and there should be things that could meet those needs pretty quickly.”

TBPN

59,716 次观看 • 4 个月前

Elon Musk helped start OpenAI, funding it and even coming up with its name. It was meant to be a non-profit company that would make AI open for everyone. Now Sam Altman is removing the non-profit part and turning it into a big money-making business.

Elon Musk helped start OpenAI, funding it and even coming up with its name. It was meant to be a non-profit company that would make AI open for everyone. Now Sam Altman is removing the non-profit part and turning it into a big money-making business.

DogeDesigner

146,088 次观看 • 8 个月前

“Many senators I know would not be able to breathe without that job. It would kill them to leave,” says Scott Pelley. “I don't want what you said to be true. But I fear that that is true. And that is a sign of a much, much deeper problem,” responds former Sen. Ben Sasse.

“Many senators I know would not be able to breathe without that job. It would kill them to leave,” says Scott Pelley. “I don't want what you said to be true. But I fear that that is true. And that is a sign of a much, much deeper problem,” responds former Sen. Ben Sasse.

60 Minutes

1,476,945 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨ELON MUSK: "One of the biggest scam/fraud hauls we've uncovered is that the Government can give money to a "non-profit" with very few controls and there's no auditing subsequently of that non-profit. They then give themselves lavish insane salaries, expense everything to the non-profit, buy jets and homes and all sorts of things. This is not just one or two, we're seeing this everywhere. It's insane."

🚨ELON MUSK: "One of the biggest scam/fraud hauls we've uncovered is that the Government can give money to a "non-profit" with very few controls and there's no auditing subsequently of that non-profit. They then give themselves lavish insane salaries, expense everything to the non-profit, buy jets and homes and all sorts of things. This is not just one or two, we're seeing this everywhere. It's insane."

Autism Capital 🧩

111,644 次观看 • 1 年前

Jordi: "Everyone's been talking about the 1-person, $100M-revenue company, but there's a much stronger incentive to just hire the incremental person." "Do you want to be the company that gets an award that doesn't matter, or do you want to win?" "It's not even a real award. It's just something you can say on the internet. Then people will debate it — they'll be like, 'Well, you hired this freelancer. You have a lawyer. Does that really count?'" "I feel like it will never actually happen."

Jordi: "Everyone's been talking about the 1-person, $100M-revenue company, but there's a much stronger incentive to just hire the incremental person." "Do you want to be the company that gets an award that doesn't matter, or do you want to win?" "It's not even a real award. It's just something you can say on the internet. Then people will debate it — they'll be like, 'Well, you hired this freelancer. You have a lawyer. Does that really count?'" "I feel like it will never actually happen."

TBPN

44,153 次观看 • 18 天前

The Apache Software Foundation Drops the "Apache" “As a non-Indigenous entity, we acknowledge that it is inappropriate for the Foundation to use Indigenous themes or language.” And, yes. It says “1985” in the date. But, do not be fooled. For it is not actually 1985.

The Apache Software Foundation Drops the "Apache" “As a non-Indigenous entity, we acknowledge that it is inappropriate for the Foundation to use Indigenous themes or language.” And, yes. It says “1985” in the date. But, do not be fooled. For it is not actually 1985.

The Lunduke Journal

20,505 次观看 • 9 个月前

Elon Musk: I provided almost all the initial money for OpenAI. Now, they're for-profit and follow a diametrically opposed purpose. “OpenAI is now really trying to maximize profit. How is it possible that an organization is founded with the goal of being open source, nonprofit – and I provided almost all the money in the beginning, almost $50 million to get it going, and no stock, I have no stock or control or anything – how is it possible to go from there to a company that's now largely worth over $100 billion and seems to be maximizing profit and is not open source? Let's say you fund a nonprofit to preserve some part of the Amazon rainforest, but instead that nonprofit becomes a lumber company, and chops down the forest and sells it. I'm considering a legal challenge, perhaps to have the court explain to me how an organization that I funded for one purpose does the diametrically opposed purpose, and becomes a for-profit. Show me the trail of breadcrumbs.” Interview with Jordan Peterson, July 22, 2024

Elon Musk: I provided almost all the initial money for OpenAI. Now, they're for-profit and follow a diametrically opposed purpose. “OpenAI is now really trying to maximize profit. How is it possible that an organization is founded with the goal of being open source, nonprofit – and I provided almost all the money in the beginning, almost $50 million to get it going, and no stock, I have no stock or control or anything – how is it possible to go from there to a company that's now largely worth over $100 billion and seems to be maximizing profit and is not open source? Let's say you fund a nonprofit to preserve some part of the Amazon rainforest, but instead that nonprofit becomes a lumber company, and chops down the forest and sells it. I'm considering a legal challenge, perhaps to have the court explain to me how an organization that I funded for one purpose does the diametrically opposed purpose, and becomes a for-profit. Show me the trail of breadcrumbs.” Interview with Jordan Peterson, July 22, 2024

ELON CLIPS

46,346 次观看 • 1 年前