Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

CNN’s Shermichael Singleton couldn’t hold back a grin as Jake Tapper melted down over President Trump’s latest AI video dropping a “payload” on protestors. But then Shermichael Singleton said what no one else on the panel would admit about the meme. TAPPER: “What’s the point that he’s making, Shermichael?...

overton_news's profile picture

Overton

257,295 subscribers

379,486 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

WATCH: Shermichael Singleton Singleton reminds the NewsNight panel criticizing Pete Hegseth's remarks that he DID serve and is fully aware of the fact that war is hell. SHERMICHAEL SINGLETON: Can I just make one point of objection to what Ana just said? You know, in politics, sometimes we make flippant remarks. If we could go back and do it over, we would. Pete Hegseth has served this country honorably- a tour in Afghanistan, a tour in Iraq. I never put on the uniform, but I certainly have a lot of damn respect for the people who do. He led his troops for about a year as a leader, and many of the generals and individuals who gave him a Bronze Star wrote admirably about his leadership position. So I don't think that this is someone who doesn't recognize the importance of war, the toll it takes on families, and that you might indeed pay the ultimate price. And so I think we shouldn't forget that. We may dislike him. You may not like the comment that he made and we could critique maybe it wasn't the right way to word it, but but this is someone who knows war more than anybody at this table that I'm familiar with, and we should keep that in mind.
3:43

WATCH: Shermichael Singleton Singleton reminds the NewsNight panel criticizing Pete Hegseth's remarks that he DID serve and is fully aware of the fact that war is hell. SHERMICHAEL SINGLETON: Can I just make one point of objection to what Ana just said? You know, in politics, sometimes we make flippant remarks. If we could go back and do it over, we would. Pete Hegseth has served this country honorably- a tour in Afghanistan, a tour in Iraq. I never put on the uniform, but I certainly have a lot of damn respect for the people who do. He led his troops for about a year as a leader, and many of the generals and individuals who gave him a Bronze Star wrote admirably about his leadership position. So I don't think that this is someone who doesn't recognize the importance of war, the toll it takes on families, and that you might indeed pay the ultimate price. And so I think we shouldn't forget that. We may dislike him. You may not like the comment that he made and we could critique maybe it wasn't the right way to word it, but but this is someone who knows war more than anybody at this table that I'm familiar with, and we should keep that in mind.

Jorge Bonilla

249,111 views • 5 months ago

.Shermichael Singleton talks Graham Platner on CNN: “Voters can forgive a mistake. This is a pattern. This is a pattern of a guy who continues to lie over and over and over again. The nazi tattoo, at first it was ‘I didn’t know what it was.’ Turns out he knew what it was years ago.”
0:42

.Shermichael Singleton talks Graham Platner on CNN: “Voters can forgive a mistake. This is a pattern. This is a pattern of a guy who continues to lie over and over and over again. The nazi tattoo, at first it was ‘I didn’t know what it was.’ Turns out he knew what it was years ago.”

RNC Research

43,778 views • 2 months ago

CNN’s Shermichael Singleton Singleton on last night’s NYC mayoral debate and whether Andrew Cuomo did anything to change the trajectory of the race and a Mamdani victory: “No...I think it’s going to be Mamdani. He’s incredibly talented. As a Republican, I certainly don’t agree with many of his positions. But there is something to be said about the arguments that he’s making to New Yorkers that is palatable. I am concerned about some of his presentations on economics. I’m concerned about the idea of the role of government as it pertains to sort of level setting for people who have economically struggled. I think there’s a different way to go about certain things, but that message is resonating. And if you’re Cuomo, can folks in New York know who Cuomo is? And there’s some real concern about his past misgivings, there’s some concern about some of the things he did as governor. And he didn’t, in my opinion, effectively address those things aggressively enough. Mamdani did. He showcased strength. And even if you’re a New Yorker, you’re curious and maybe say, I don’t disagree with him. You watch that and say, this is a guy who will fight for me, and that moves the needle for voters.”
1:02

CNN’s Shermichael Singleton Singleton on last night’s NYC mayoral debate and whether Andrew Cuomo did anything to change the trajectory of the race and a Mamdani victory: “No...I think it’s going to be Mamdani. He’s incredibly talented. As a Republican, I certainly don’t agree with many of his positions. But there is something to be said about the arguments that he’s making to New Yorkers that is palatable. I am concerned about some of his presentations on economics. I’m concerned about the idea of the role of government as it pertains to sort of level setting for people who have economically struggled. I think there’s a different way to go about certain things, but that message is resonating. And if you’re Cuomo, can folks in New York know who Cuomo is? And there’s some real concern about his past misgivings, there’s some concern about some of the things he did as governor. And he didn’t, in my opinion, effectively address those things aggressively enough. Mamdani did. He showcased strength. And even if you’re a New Yorker, you’re curious and maybe say, I don’t disagree with him. You watch that and say, this is a guy who will fight for me, and that moves the needle for voters.”

Curtis Houck

10,567 views • 9 months ago

Shermichael Singleton shuts down a New York Times reporter melting down over President Trump receiving the FIFA Peace Prize. Lulu Garcia-Navarro tried to frame the moment as Trump needing people to pander to him, but Shermichael Singleton reminded her of his very real peace efforts. GARCIA-NAVARRO: “The thing is this. He’s incredibly powerful, and there are real accomplishments that he has actually made.” “And I don’t understand the constant need that he feels to have people sort of pander to him. It’s it’s just a strange impulse when you are the most powerful man in the world.” SINGLETON: “But is there any harm in this? I mean, it’s a very serious question here.” GARCIA-NAVARRO: “Psychologists say, yes.” SINGLETON: “Congo, DRC, I did some work with the DRC a couple of years ago. That’s important. There are some factions that are still fighting there, but you have to acknowledge that.” “Pakistan, India, that was a very real thing.” GARCIA-NAVARRO: “But why is FIFA giving him an award?” SINGLETON: “My point is, there are some very serious resolutions that the president has under his belt in less than a year.” “I don’t have a problem with it being acknowledged, whether it’s FIFA, whether it’s the New York Times, whether it’s CNN, what’s the problem with it?”
0:57

Shermichael Singleton shuts down a New York Times reporter melting down over President Trump receiving the FIFA Peace Prize. Lulu Garcia-Navarro tried to frame the moment as Trump needing people to pander to him, but Shermichael Singleton reminded her of his very real peace efforts. GARCIA-NAVARRO: “The thing is this. He’s incredibly powerful, and there are real accomplishments that he has actually made.” “And I don’t understand the constant need that he feels to have people sort of pander to him. It’s it’s just a strange impulse when you are the most powerful man in the world.” SINGLETON: “But is there any harm in this? I mean, it’s a very serious question here.” GARCIA-NAVARRO: “Psychologists say, yes.” SINGLETON: “Congo, DRC, I did some work with the DRC a couple of years ago. That’s important. There are some factions that are still fighting there, but you have to acknowledge that.” “Pakistan, India, that was a very real thing.” GARCIA-NAVARRO: “But why is FIFA giving him an award?” SINGLETON: “My point is, there are some very serious resolutions that the president has under his belt in less than a year.” “I don’t have a problem with it being acknowledged, whether it’s FIFA, whether it’s the New York Times, whether it’s CNN, what’s the problem with it?”

Overton

45,936 views • 8 months ago

This man’s dog passed away a few months ago. They used to tie him up to this tree out in the front yard as he loved being outside. They even buried his leash at the base of the tree. As he was walking by the tree they used to tie him up to, they noticed a formation at the bottom of the tree on the trunk and it looks so similar to a photo they have of him. He said he’s aware of pareidolia, where people see patterns or formations in certain things. But he doesn’t believe it is that. I see it. Think it is so cool and beautiful. ❤️ Do you see it? What do you think it is? Ever heard of pareidolia? Think he is seeing what he wants to see? Or, do you think it is definitely a sign of his beloved dog?
0:45

This man’s dog passed away a few months ago. They used to tie him up to this tree out in the front yard as he loved being outside. They even buried his leash at the base of the tree. As he was walking by the tree they used to tie him up to, they noticed a formation at the bottom of the tree on the trunk and it looks so similar to a photo they have of him. He said he’s aware of pareidolia, where people see patterns or formations in certain things. But he doesn’t believe it is that. I see it. Think it is so cool and beautiful. ❤️ Do you see it? What do you think it is? Ever heard of pareidolia? Think he is seeing what he wants to see? Or, do you think it is definitely a sign of his beloved dog?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

470,320 views • 2 months ago

WATCH: CNN’s Shermichael Singleton Singleton goes postal on the Hunter Biden pardon, saying this “facade” President Biden and Democrats created as “this great arbiter of morality and truth...protecting norms and institutions of our country” has proven to be utter “trash”... “Democrats portrayed the President as this great arbiter of morality and truth. They said that he somehow was a better standard bearer for protecting norms and institutions of our country and yet, that wasn't true. They lied. You can go all the way back to 2022 when they were asked this question and the White House continuously, consecutively lied over and over and over again. They could have simply said to MJ's point, to Chuck's point, the President isn't going to put his thumb on the scales of justice. He's going to wait. He hasn't made a decision yet. Most people would have expected that. They would have respected that. I think most people, to your point, Chuck, believed if it was my child, I probably would have done the same thing. That's not the issue, Jake. The question here, the burden on the White House, I would argue, is the continuous lies. You said that you were better than this other guy. You criticized the other guy for all of these things. And now, your DOJ is committing witch hunts and this is now politicized, where you appointed Merrick Garland. You can't blame Republicans for that and I can only imagine, as I've talked to a lot of Republicans, if this were Donald Trump and I know people are going to give him a lot of criticism for the pardons he's already given, but if this were him and Don Jr. or Eric Trump or Ivanka, I can only imagine what the headlines would have been. And I will say, if you're Democrats and you're trying to walk this straight line, that we're somehow better than Republicans because we care more about the future and state of this democracy, I think that's — that's — that's — that's trash now, no one believes it. No one believes it. They've lost all credibility for the facade they portrayed for several years.”
1:31

WATCH: CNN’s Shermichael Singleton Singleton goes postal on the Hunter Biden pardon, saying this “facade” President Biden and Democrats created as “this great arbiter of morality and truth...protecting norms and institutions of our country” has proven to be utter “trash”... “Democrats portrayed the President as this great arbiter of morality and truth. They said that he somehow was a better standard bearer for protecting norms and institutions of our country and yet, that wasn't true. They lied. You can go all the way back to 2022 when they were asked this question and the White House continuously, consecutively lied over and over and over again. They could have simply said to MJ's point, to Chuck's point, the President isn't going to put his thumb on the scales of justice. He's going to wait. He hasn't made a decision yet. Most people would have expected that. They would have respected that. I think most people, to your point, Chuck, believed if it was my child, I probably would have done the same thing. That's not the issue, Jake. The question here, the burden on the White House, I would argue, is the continuous lies. You said that you were better than this other guy. You criticized the other guy for all of these things. And now, your DOJ is committing witch hunts and this is now politicized, where you appointed Merrick Garland. You can't blame Republicans for that and I can only imagine, as I've talked to a lot of Republicans, if this were Donald Trump and I know people are going to give him a lot of criticism for the pardons he's already given, but if this were him and Don Jr. or Eric Trump or Ivanka, I can only imagine what the headlines would have been. And I will say, if you're Democrats and you're trying to walk this straight line, that we're somehow better than Republicans because we care more about the future and state of this democracy, I think that's — that's — that's — that's trash now, no one believes it. No one believes it. They've lost all credibility for the facade they portrayed for several years.”

Curtis Houck

745,585 views • 1 year ago

This is a longer video than I normally post, but it was a special request. I’m not making a deep theological point or criticism, just found this to be funny. James White was interacting with some Roman Catholics, and they told him that Taco_Talks is the leader of the Protestant movement. Well, James melted down. He got so triggered by it. And you can tell that he doesn’t want to insult Taco, but he sort of does so anyway. It is EXTREMELY clear who James thinks is the leader of the Protestant movement. When I heard this, I instantly thought that the Catholics were trolling him. There is some debate about that, but I don’t care. I WANT to believe (Fox Mulder voice) that he was trolled here, purposely. You can’t convince me otherwise!
7:35

This is a longer video than I normally post, but it was a special request. I’m not making a deep theological point or criticism, just found this to be funny. James White was interacting with some Roman Catholics, and they told him that Taco_Talks is the leader of the Protestant movement. Well, James melted down. He got so triggered by it. And you can tell that he doesn’t want to insult Taco, but he sort of does so anyway. It is EXTREMELY clear who James thinks is the leader of the Protestant movement. When I heard this, I instantly thought that the Catholics were trolling him. There is some debate about that, but I don’t care. I WANT to believe (Fox Mulder voice) that he was trolled here, purposely. You can’t convince me otherwise!

Defiant Baptist

32,478 views • 5 months ago

‘It’s not clear Trump even READ the Memorandum of Understanding he signed with Iran.’ —Doug Bandow, former Special Assistant to President Reagan ‘The Iranians do have to be careful not to overreach. They hold the Strait. That gives them enormous leverage, but they need to be prepared to make a deal when they can. I think what they were worried about here was that it was pretty clear Trump was violating the MOU in terms of the Strait as well as the issue of Lebanon. Now, it's not clear that he actually read the MOU before he signed it. Did he actually know what was in it? It was somewhat ambiguous. You send over a couple of real estate developers, a childhood friend and your son-in-law and expect them to work out negotiations with Iran? What could possibly go wrong? The point is that I think he realised he was in trouble, he got a lot of flak for it and thought that he could force the Iranians to back down. They are holding firm. I think the danger here is they have to be prepared at some point, I think, to make a deal. And the question then is, how do you communicate that to Trump while indicating he's got to make the real concessions… but that they're willing to let him, in a sense, get away with some of his victory claims at home, as long as they get the substantive wins in the Middle East?’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
1:19

‘It’s not clear Trump even READ the Memorandum of Understanding he signed with Iran.’ —Doug Bandow, former Special Assistant to President Reagan ‘The Iranians do have to be careful not to overreach. They hold the Strait. That gives them enormous leverage, but they need to be prepared to make a deal when they can. I think what they were worried about here was that it was pretty clear Trump was violating the MOU in terms of the Strait as well as the issue of Lebanon. Now, it's not clear that he actually read the MOU before he signed it. Did he actually know what was in it? It was somewhat ambiguous. You send over a couple of real estate developers, a childhood friend and your son-in-law and expect them to work out negotiations with Iran? What could possibly go wrong? The point is that I think he realised he was in trouble, he got a lot of flak for it and thought that he could force the Iranians to back down. They are holding firm. I think the danger here is they have to be prepared at some point, I think, to make a deal. And the question then is, how do you communicate that to Trump while indicating he's got to make the real concessions… but that they're willing to let him, in a sense, get away with some of his victory claims at home, as long as they get the substantive wins in the Middle East?’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

19,000 views • 19 days ago

Tony Hinchcliffe Says the Legacy Media’s Attacks on His Trump Rally Set Backfired “I'm not Jimmy Fallon or any of these darlings of theirs. I think that they thought that it was going to make everything look bad. But meanwhile I think anybody with a sense of humor at all saw it and goes, I think this is the party with a sense of humor.”
2:51

Tony Hinchcliffe Says the Legacy Media’s Attacks on His Trump Rally Set Backfired “I'm not Jimmy Fallon or any of these darlings of theirs. I think that they thought that it was going to make everything look bad. But meanwhile I think anybody with a sense of humor at all saw it and goes, I think this is the party with a sense of humor.”

Chief Nerd

172,053 views • 7 months ago

A C-SPAN caller just gave a perspective on President Trump that you almost never hear in the media. C-SPAN CALLER: “First of all, I want to appreciate the president and give him credit for being able to show up the second time after the first incident.” “I think a lot of people don’t give the president credit.” “He jokes a lot. He is a funny guy, and I think he is going to do his best to have fun tonight.” “The media is very critical of him, and sometimes he also lashes out at the media, but I think tonight he’s going to joke about the media, he’s going to joke about himself, and just try to have a good time with the media tonight.” “As you can see, over the years, his relationship has developed with the media, even some people who you think would not have a good relationship with the president, eventually have a good relationship with the president.” “For instance, the president of this organization…they didn’t have a relationship in his first administration, but today they do have a good relationship.” “So I think the president is someone who, when you get to know him, when you get closer to him, you get to understand him more.”
1:07

A C-SPAN caller just gave a perspective on President Trump that you almost never hear in the media. C-SPAN CALLER: “First of all, I want to appreciate the president and give him credit for being able to show up the second time after the first incident.” “I think a lot of people don’t give the president credit.” “He jokes a lot. He is a funny guy, and I think he is going to do his best to have fun tonight.” “The media is very critical of him, and sometimes he also lashes out at the media, but I think tonight he’s going to joke about the media, he’s going to joke about himself, and just try to have a good time with the media tonight.” “As you can see, over the years, his relationship has developed with the media, even some people who you think would not have a good relationship with the president, eventually have a good relationship with the president.” “For instance, the president of this organization…they didn’t have a relationship in his first administration, but today they do have a good relationship.” “So I think the president is someone who, when you get to know him, when you get closer to him, you get to understand him more.”

Overton

157,040 views • 14 days ago

Rory McIlroy has never minced his words when it comes to his views on LIV Golf. He was asked about it again yesterday, and in typical Rory fashion, after saying he was “too judgemental” with players that went, he then said “if you want to be the most competitive golfer you can be, this (PGA Tour) is the place to be. And if you don't want to play here, I think that says something about you.” Speaking after a 5 under par 67 to climb inside the top 10 of the Truist Championship, Rory spoke about his thoughts on the news that the Saudi Arabian PIF was pulling funding to the league: “Yeah, look, I think everyone sort of knows my views on LIV and where it stands in the game of golf. I don't think I need to rehash any of that. It's never been for me and, look, it doesn't mean that LIV is going to go away. They're going to go and try and find alternative investment, whatever that may look like. But when one of the wealthiest sovereign wealth funds in the world thinks that you're too expensive for them, that sort of says something (laughing).” He then was asked what a possible route back for players to the PGA Tour would look like: “It's a question if they do want to come back. Obviously we have seen the quotes over the last few days. And, you know, it seems like some of the guys, if -- again, it all depends on what happens to LIV. But if it is a scenario where they have the option to come back and play on the traditional tours, you know, I think Brian Rolapp has said anything that makes this Tour stronger, anything that makes the DP World Tour stronger, I think everyone should be open to that. That's just good business practice. “So, but again I think there's going to be a lot of sort of bridges to cross to get there, just because, you know, obviously the guys over there are under contract and if they are able to keep it going and get a schedule together next year, it seems like those guys are still going to play the majority of their golf on LIV, in whatever form it takes.” That was followed up with a question about whether he was surprised that LIV Golf players have been outspoken about not wanting to return to the PGA Tour: “Yeah, which is totally fine. Like, again, I think I've said at the start, I was probably too judgmental with the guys that went because I was seeing it from my point of view and maybe not seeing it from other points of view. But again, I'm not going to judge anyone for not wanting to play on the PGA Tour. “I don't know, you know, does that mean that they go play DP World Tour maybe; if that's a pathway, that would make the DP World Tour stronger, and I would be delighted with that, because that's my home Tour, at the end of the day. “But this is, if you want to be the most competitive golfer you can be, this (PGA Tour) is the place to be. And if you don't want to play here, I think that says something about you.” Rory is 4 shots behind Sungjae Im heading to the weekend at Quail Hollow. Rory McIlroy PGA TOUR Truist Championship
2:47

Rory McIlroy has never minced his words when it comes to his views on LIV Golf. He was asked about it again yesterday, and in typical Rory fashion, after saying he was “too judgemental” with players that went, he then said “if you want to be the most competitive golfer you can be, this (PGA Tour) is the place to be. And if you don't want to play here, I think that says something about you.” Speaking after a 5 under par 67 to climb inside the top 10 of the Truist Championship, Rory spoke about his thoughts on the news that the Saudi Arabian PIF was pulling funding to the league: “Yeah, look, I think everyone sort of knows my views on LIV and where it stands in the game of golf. I don't think I need to rehash any of that. It's never been for me and, look, it doesn't mean that LIV is going to go away. They're going to go and try and find alternative investment, whatever that may look like. But when one of the wealthiest sovereign wealth funds in the world thinks that you're too expensive for them, that sort of says something (laughing).” He then was asked what a possible route back for players to the PGA Tour would look like: “It's a question if they do want to come back. Obviously we have seen the quotes over the last few days. And, you know, it seems like some of the guys, if -- again, it all depends on what happens to LIV. But if it is a scenario where they have the option to come back and play on the traditional tours, you know, I think Brian Rolapp has said anything that makes this Tour stronger, anything that makes the DP World Tour stronger, I think everyone should be open to that. That's just good business practice. “So, but again I think there's going to be a lot of sort of bridges to cross to get there, just because, you know, obviously the guys over there are under contract and if they are able to keep it going and get a schedule together next year, it seems like those guys are still going to play the majority of their golf on LIV, in whatever form it takes.” That was followed up with a question about whether he was surprised that LIV Golf players have been outspoken about not wanting to return to the PGA Tour: “Yeah, which is totally fine. Like, again, I think I've said at the start, I was probably too judgmental with the guys that went because I was seeing it from my point of view and maybe not seeing it from other points of view. But again, I'm not going to judge anyone for not wanting to play on the PGA Tour. “I don't know, you know, does that mean that they go play DP World Tour maybe; if that's a pathway, that would make the DP World Tour stronger, and I would be delighted with that, because that's my home Tour, at the end of the day. “But this is, if you want to be the most competitive golfer you can be, this (PGA Tour) is the place to be. And if you don't want to play here, I think that says something about you.” Rory is 4 shots behind Sungjae Im heading to the weekend at Quail Hollow. Rory McIlroy PGA TOUR Truist Championship

Flushing It

33,565 views • 3 months ago

Former CDC Director dr. Robert Redfield: "I happen to be of the view that I don't think Secretary Kennedy is anti-vaccine. I do believe he's for transparency and honest discussion about what we know about vaccines in terms of their safety and efficacy. And I think some of that has been sort of skirted through over the last couple of years." "I still say what I said when he got confirmed that I think Kennedy has the potential to be the most consequential Secretary of Health that our nation's ever had. That said, I understand a lot of the controversies and a lot of the way people act." "I thought the hearing today was very unfortunate. I think you brought it up. I think there was no real communication in that hearing." "It was people with their own position. Kennedy never really had the opportunity to explain why he thought what he thought. You and I can agree or disagree with what he thinks, but I do think it's important that you can express that."
1:06

Former CDC Director dr. Robert Redfield: "I happen to be of the view that I don't think Secretary Kennedy is anti-vaccine. I do believe he's for transparency and honest discussion about what we know about vaccines in terms of their safety and efficacy. And I think some of that has been sort of skirted through over the last couple of years." "I still say what I said when he got confirmed that I think Kennedy has the potential to be the most consequential Secretary of Health that our nation's ever had. That said, I understand a lot of the controversies and a lot of the way people act." "I thought the hearing today was very unfortunate. I think you brought it up. I think there was no real communication in that hearing." "It was people with their own position. Kennedy never really had the opportunity to explain why he thought what he thought. You and I can agree or disagree with what he thinks, but I do think it's important that you can express that."

Camus

33,374 views • 11 months ago

Fox’s Jacqui Heinrich: “Given how the Iranians have been behaving, do you have any regrets about lifting the naval blockade or giving the sanctions waivers?” President Trump: “N, no. I gave them a chance. I wanted to give them a chance at making a deal. You know, we had a deal two days ago. It was done, and then all of a sudden they couldn’t do it. They didn’t like something about the deal, they couldn’t do it, and they shot first, and that was a big mistake that they shot first, because we have been knocking the hell out of them. They’re very difficult people. 47 years we put up with it the USS Cole, you go back all the way. Thousands of people, thousands of Americans were killed. A lot of soldiers were killed. A lot of soldiers are walking around or not walking around. I mean, they’ve been so badly injured. The arms, the legs, the face with the Soleimani, with the bomb. A — they call it the roadside bomb. Most people call it the roadside bomb. It’s a disaster, and I killed him in my first administration. Had I not, it might be a different story today. He was a mad genius. He was a mad — probably a mad man. But he was a general and he had total control over the country, and I actually think the leaders of Iran were afraid of Soleimani. But I killed him. And by the way, with him went a very bad person, also. They happened to be meeting each other at the airport, and a very bad person from Iraq — happened to be a leader of Iraq — happened to be killed in that same incident. So, I don’t know if I did you a favor or not. I’ve never asked you that question. You probably would know better than me. But no, I think — I think that — I think that what we’ve done to Iran is we’ve taken away all of them, almost all of their military capability.”
1:55

Fox’s Jacqui Heinrich: “Given how the Iranians have been behaving, do you have any regrets about lifting the naval blockade or giving the sanctions waivers?” President Trump: “N, no. I gave them a chance. I wanted to give them a chance at making a deal. You know, we had a deal two days ago. It was done, and then all of a sudden they couldn’t do it. They didn’t like something about the deal, they couldn’t do it, and they shot first, and that was a big mistake that they shot first, because we have been knocking the hell out of them. They’re very difficult people. 47 years we put up with it the USS Cole, you go back all the way. Thousands of people, thousands of Americans were killed. A lot of soldiers were killed. A lot of soldiers are walking around or not walking around. I mean, they’ve been so badly injured. The arms, the legs, the face with the Soleimani, with the bomb. A — they call it the roadside bomb. Most people call it the roadside bomb. It’s a disaster, and I killed him in my first administration. Had I not, it might be a different story today. He was a mad genius. He was a mad — probably a mad man. But he was a general and he had total control over the country, and I actually think the leaders of Iran were afraid of Soleimani. But I killed him. And by the way, with him went a very bad person, also. They happened to be meeting each other at the airport, and a very bad person from Iraq — happened to be a leader of Iraq — happened to be killed in that same incident. So, I don’t know if I did you a favor or not. I’ve never asked you that question. You probably would know better than me. But no, I think — I think that — I think that what we’ve done to Iran is we’ve taken away all of them, almost all of their military capability.”

Curtis Houck

13,939 views • 24 days ago

Other statements by President Trump during the meeting with President Zelenskyy today: ▪️ "I just think they [Ukraine and Russia] are going to make a deal. This deal has been in the works for a long time. It's got the pluses, the minuses. They know what it is." ▪️ Q: "You say that Putin is ready to finish this war. What if he doesn't? Are you ready to put pressure on Russia? To put more sanctions?" President Trump: "We have a lot of pressure on Putin. I don't think he likes what's going on. There's a lot of pressure on Putin to get it done. He wants it ended as soon as he can end it. He wants to end the war. But a lot of people don't believe that." ▪️ Q: "What are Putin's conditions for ending the war?" President Trump: "There were certain conditions that were a little bit different. I think they're changing. I think they're probably getting a little bit better toward some of the things that you'd like."
1:11

Other statements by President Trump during the meeting with President Zelenskyy today: ▪️ "I just think they [Ukraine and Russia] are going to make a deal. This deal has been in the works for a long time. It's got the pluses, the minuses. They know what it is." ▪️ Q: "You say that Putin is ready to finish this war. What if he doesn't? Are you ready to put pressure on Russia? To put more sanctions?" President Trump: "We have a lot of pressure on Putin. I don't think he likes what's going on. There's a lot of pressure on Putin to get it done. He wants it ended as soon as he can end it. He wants to end the war. But a lot of people don't believe that." ▪️ Q: "What are Putin's conditions for ending the war?" President Trump: "There were certain conditions that were a little bit different. I think they're changing. I think they're probably getting a little bit better toward some of the things that you'd like."

Anton Gerashchenko

44,950 views • 1 month ago

Reporter: A number of Republicans are calling on you to apologize for that Obama post. Is that something you’re going to do? Trump: No, I didn’t make a mistake. I look at thousands of things. I looked at the beginning of it. It was fine. I guess it was a takeoff on the Lion King. A lot of people were covered. If they would have looked, they would have seen it and probably they would have had the sense to take it down.
0:54

Reporter: A number of Republicans are calling on you to apologize for that Obama post. Is that something you’re going to do? Trump: No, I didn’t make a mistake. I look at thousands of things. I looked at the beginning of it. It was fine. I guess it was a takeoff on the Lion King. A lot of people were covered. If they would have looked, they would have seen it and probably they would have had the sense to take it down.

Clash Report

47,898 views • 6 months ago

More from Trump and Qatar gift: "I think this is just a gesture of good-faith." "It'll go to my library... I thought it was a great gesture." He says he would NOT use the plane himself after leaving office. It would basically sit in his library. "I think what happens with the plane is that, you know, we're very disappointed that it's taking Boeing so long to build a new Air Force One. You know, we have an Air Force One that's 40 years old. And if you take a look at that compared to the new plane of the equivalent, you know, stature at the time, it's not even the same ballgame. You look at some of the Arab countries and the planes they have parked alongside of the United States of America plane, it's like from a different planet." "When I came back, I said, by the way, what's going on with the Boeings that are coming in? 'Well, sir, they're way behind.' And they are way behind." "I think Qatar, who has really, we've helped them a lot over the years in terms of security and safety. I think they, and very, very nicely, and I have a lot of respect for the leadership and for the leader, Qatar. And I think they knew about it because they buy Boeings, they buy a lot of Boeings. And they knew about it and they said 'we would like to do something,' and if we can get a 747 as a contribution to our Defense Department to use during a couple of years while they're building the other ones - I think that was a very nice gesture." "Now, I could be a stupid person and say, oh, no, we don't want a free plane. We give free things out. We'll take one, too. And it helps us out because, again, we're talking about we have 40-year-old aircraft. The money we spend, the maintenance we spend on those planes to keep them tippy-top is astronomical."
3:24

More from Trump and Qatar gift: "I think this is just a gesture of good-faith." "It'll go to my library... I thought it was a great gesture." He says he would NOT use the plane himself after leaving office. It would basically sit in his library. "I think what happens with the plane is that, you know, we're very disappointed that it's taking Boeing so long to build a new Air Force One. You know, we have an Air Force One that's 40 years old. And if you take a look at that compared to the new plane of the equivalent, you know, stature at the time, it's not even the same ballgame. You look at some of the Arab countries and the planes they have parked alongside of the United States of America plane, it's like from a different planet." "When I came back, I said, by the way, what's going on with the Boeings that are coming in? 'Well, sir, they're way behind.' And they are way behind." "I think Qatar, who has really, we've helped them a lot over the years in terms of security and safety. I think they, and very, very nicely, and I have a lot of respect for the leadership and for the leader, Qatar. And I think they knew about it because they buy Boeings, they buy a lot of Boeings. And they knew about it and they said 'we would like to do something,' and if we can get a 747 as a contribution to our Defense Department to use during a couple of years while they're building the other ones - I think that was a very nice gesture." "Now, I could be a stupid person and say, oh, no, we don't want a free plane. We give free things out. We'll take one, too. And it helps us out because, again, we're talking about we have 40-year-old aircraft. The money we spend, the maintenance we spend on those planes to keep them tippy-top is astronomical."

Open Source Intel

118,810 views • 1 year ago

Bill Maher’s audience laughs as he’s forced to remind liberals “you’re not a good person” if you want Trump killed. “He’s not Hitler!” “I would just like to say, if you… watched that and were disappointed the president wasn’t killed…” [Audience laughs] “See, they’re laughing at that. You’re not a good person or a smart person, but definitely not a good person.” “I was reading this, in your [NYT] paper interview with Governor Pritzker of Illinois, and they asked him, what does the next president have to be. And he said ‘good, decent and kind,’ which, who can disagree with that? And certainly Trump has often not been good, decent or kind.” [Bret Stephens tries to butt in]: “Right, but also —” “But he’s not Hitler!” Maher fires back, shutting him down. “Liberals used to always say, and they were right to say it, that a lot of this very violent rhetoric that we hear on the left, it inspires the borderline personalities to then do something. And they were right. I never thought they were wrong. But the shoe’s on the other foot now.” “I mean, it’s on both feet. But you got to own this kind of rhetoric. This is why I was against this ‘he’s Hitler’ bullshit. I mean, if you really believe that he is a Hitler McPedophile, then you kind of have to kill him. That’s the mentality they have.”
1:06

Bill Maher’s audience laughs as he’s forced to remind liberals “you’re not a good person” if you want Trump killed. “He’s not Hitler!” “I would just like to say, if you… watched that and were disappointed the president wasn’t killed…” [Audience laughs] “See, they’re laughing at that. You’re not a good person or a smart person, but definitely not a good person.” “I was reading this, in your [NYT] paper interview with Governor Pritzker of Illinois, and they asked him, what does the next president have to be. And he said ‘good, decent and kind,’ which, who can disagree with that? And certainly Trump has often not been good, decent or kind.” [Bret Stephens tries to butt in]: “Right, but also —” “But he’s not Hitler!” Maher fires back, shutting him down. “Liberals used to always say, and they were right to say it, that a lot of this very violent rhetoric that we hear on the left, it inspires the borderline personalities to then do something. And they were right. I never thought they were wrong. But the shoe’s on the other foot now.” “I mean, it’s on both feet. But you got to own this kind of rhetoric. This is why I was against this ‘he’s Hitler’ bullshit. I mean, if you really believe that he is a Hitler McPedophile, then you kind of have to kill him. That’s the mentality they have.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

442,506 views • 3 months ago

ABC News photojournalist Chris Plater, a witness to the scene after two National Guardsmen were shot in D.C.: "One person said something like, you know, man, the guy went up there and started shooting at the National Guard. I didn't get to talk to him, but I didn't get to, you know, know who he was. But it seemed like he suggested that somebody went up and started shooting at the National Guard." "One National Guard was lying on his side. They were rendering aid to him. He wasn't moving, but he was on his side. And then I looked at the the other National Guard member that was down, and I saw compressions going on. I, you know, it was -- it was a lot of people around there. So I don't think it was the person that had done the shooting. And all I could tell you is that I identified two National Guard members that were being worked on. Eventually, the one National Guard that was on the side, he got to move a little bit while he was on his side. And they were still, you know, kind of, you know, working with him. But the other national Guard member, I just saw compression going on with him in the chest area, and that's that's all I can tell you."
1:25

ABC News photojournalist Chris Plater, a witness to the scene after two National Guardsmen were shot in D.C.: "One person said something like, you know, man, the guy went up there and started shooting at the National Guard. I didn't get to talk to him, but I didn't get to, you know, know who he was. But it seemed like he suggested that somebody went up and started shooting at the National Guard." "One National Guard was lying on his side. They were rendering aid to him. He wasn't moving, but he was on his side. And then I looked at the the other National Guard member that was down, and I saw compressions going on. I, you know, it was -- it was a lot of people around there. So I don't think it was the person that had done the shooting. And all I could tell you is that I identified two National Guard members that were being worked on. Eventually, the one National Guard that was on the side, he got to move a little bit while he was on his side. And they were still, you know, kind of, you know, working with him. But the other national Guard member, I just saw compression going on with him in the chest area, and that's that's all I can tell you."

Curtis Houck

697,899 views • 8 months ago

Reporter: What do you make of Donald Trump’s attack on Kamala Harris’ identity? Shapiro: I think it’s offensive and it’s more of the same from Trump. He attacks other people based on what they look like or who they pray to or who they love.. He tries to divide Americans because he struggles with uplifting all Americans. I think it shows profound weakness.. Attacking the identity of the VP doesn’t at all reflect negatively on the VP but shows a real insecurity about Trump. This guy is nervous as hell to face Kamala Harris. He’s already trying to back out of the debate. Part of that is because he knows she’s going to whoop him in the debate… There’s another reason why he really doesn’t want to debate her and doesn’t really want to have a conversation about the issues. It’s because he can’t defend his record. He has a record of failure…I think Donald Trump’s attacks speak volumes about the kind of coward that he is, about his own failings, and say nothing about the great qualifications of the VP
2:33

Reporter: What do you make of Donald Trump’s attack on Kamala Harris’ identity? Shapiro: I think it’s offensive and it’s more of the same from Trump. He attacks other people based on what they look like or who they pray to or who they love.. He tries to divide Americans because he struggles with uplifting all Americans. I think it shows profound weakness.. Attacking the identity of the VP doesn’t at all reflect negatively on the VP but shows a real insecurity about Trump. This guy is nervous as hell to face Kamala Harris. He’s already trying to back out of the debate. Part of that is because he knows she’s going to whoop him in the debate… There’s another reason why he really doesn’t want to debate her and doesn’t really want to have a conversation about the issues. It’s because he can’t defend his record. He has a record of failure…I think Donald Trump’s attacks speak volumes about the kind of coward that he is, about his own failings, and say nothing about the great qualifications of the VP

Acyn

1,567,346 views • 2 years ago

Asmongold says he could never represent or lead a campaign or any kind of movement because of the way he looks 👀😭 “I can work from the shadows. I can never represent any sort of a movement because of the way that I look. I think people see the way that somebody like me looks, and then they are immediately like, ‘You know what? I'm on the other side. Whatever. I'm a warlock.’ Isn't that bad? Is there any other creator whose appearance is negatively discussed more on social media than me? Think about that. Is there a single person?”
0:36

Asmongold says he could never represent or lead a campaign or any kind of movement because of the way he looks 👀😭 “I can work from the shadows. I can never represent any sort of a movement because of the way that I look. I think people see the way that somebody like me looks, and then they are immediately like, ‘You know what? I'm on the other side. Whatever. I'm a warlock.’ Isn't that bad? Is there any other creator whose appearance is negatively discussed more on social media than me? Think about that. Is there a single person?”

Prism

78,271 views • 1 month ago