正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Code editing has been deprecated I still need to be there to feed insights, but the actual editing is fully automated. I now program by just talking to Sonnet on terminal. This complex refactor should take days, and it was done by lunchtime. How long til it is fully autonomous?

163,278 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Taelin 的头像
Taelin2 年前

Also 80% of the interventions are me explaining Kind's syntax. If only Claude was fine tuned on it. I considered maining TypeScript, but that 0.7s startup time is a productivity clear. Agda/Lean even worse. Haskell perhaps? Not sure if GHC likes 1000's of small files tho

Taelin 的头像
Taelin2 年前

Today's refactor cost $53

insanium 的头像
insanium2 年前

yes and then something very precise goes wrong that the language model cannot fix, and you're forced to dig through code you do not understand, which ends up taking longer than just writing the code yourself

Taelin 的头像
Taelin2 年前

That's the advantage of understanding all of it 🥰 At many points the AI made mistakes, so, yes, you absolutely need to know what you're doing. Sonnet will type for you, not think for you. It is kinda like a buff that gives you +700% WPM

htechllife 的头像
htechllife2 年前

Can you share how much you spend on claude API per month? Just to have an idea.

Taelin 的头像
Taelin2 年前

@matheusmr95 💀

phi ARCHITECT 的头像
phi ARCHITECT2 年前

ultimately we won't bother with coding languages made for humans

Taelin 的头像
Taelin2 年前

💯 That's the obvious logical conclusion!

ryunuck (p≈np) 的头像
ryunuck (p≈np)2 年前

I bet you wrote the tool using sonnet as well. The bigger these models become, the greater their ability to bootstrap both themselves and better UX to host themselves into for agentic human pilots.

Taelin 的头像
Taelin2 年前

I wrote it using GPT-4! Sonnet didn't exist

相关视频