正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Codiff 0.1 is out * Fast Local Code Reviews * Optional LLM Walkthroughs * Inline Review Comments This is the best companion for reviewing output of coding agents. macOS Release:

Christoph Nakazawa

34,605 subscribers

78,641 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

this is f**king gold someone mapped the research behind AI agents reviewing other AI agents, including 116 real coding tasks with Claude + Codex the pairing matters more than people think 1. Claude reviewing Codex pushed 71.6% → 89.7% 2. Codex self-review reached 84.5% 3. Codex reviewing Claude dropped 91.4% → 82.8% the graph connects this to self-repair, code review and multi-agent verification the takeaway is simple: the best agent is not always the best reviewer save this before letting one model write the code and approve itself

this is f**king gold someone mapped the research behind AI agents reviewing other AI agents, including 116 real coding tasks with Claude + Codex the pairing matters more than people think 1. Claude reviewing Codex pushed 71.6% → 89.7% 2. Codex self-review reached 84.5% 3. Codex reviewing Claude dropped 91.4% → 82.8% the graph connects this to self-repair, code review and multi-agent verification the takeaway is simple: the best agent is not always the best reviewer save this before letting one model write the code and approve itself

Gipp 🦅

12,632 次观看 • 26 天前

Code reviews are changing forever! CodeRabbit's AI-powered platform is revolutionising how we do code reviews. Imagine a team of seasoned experts in the form of AI agents reviewing every PR that is made. 100% FREE for open-source projects.

Code reviews are changing forever! CodeRabbit's AI-powered platform is revolutionising how we do code reviews. Imagine a team of seasoned experts in the form of AI agents reviewing every PR that is made. 100% FREE for open-source projects.

Akshay 🚀

33,440 次观看 • 1 年前

I’ve been working on dunk. It’s a terminal diff reviewer where you mark issues inline, then let a coding agent fix them. It started as a fork of hunk, but I stripped it down to the loop I need: review → my comments → agent fixes I’m spending time reviewing code and leaving comments for agents rather than writing code myself. But in most tools, that feedback loop still feels broken. dunk is a simple way to make it work across Claude Code, Codex, Pi, etc.

I’ve been working on dunk. It’s a terminal diff reviewer where you mark issues inline, then let a coding agent fix them. It started as a fork of hunk, but I stripped it down to the loop I need: review → my comments → agent fixes I’m spending time reviewing code and leaving comments for agents rather than writing code myself. But in most tools, that feedback loop still feels broken. dunk is a simple way to make it work across Claude Code, Codex, Pi, etc.

Amir Salihefendić

13,156 次观看 • 3 个月前

🪐 Cantina Code Demo Release 🪐 A new era for security reviews is starting. We will continue to roll out updates and features to make this the best code review experience across any industry. Available to all Cantina researchers to explore below👇

🪐 Cantina Code Demo Release 🪐 A new era for security reviews is starting. We will continue to roll out updates and features to make this the best code review experience across any industry. Available to all Cantina researchers to explore below👇

Cantina 🪐

26,573 次观看 • 2 年前

Anthropic Boris Cherny says the role of programmers is shifting from writing code to orchestrating agents "it's more about reviewing code than writing code" complex tasks still require manual coding, but those windows are shrinking. eventually, managing agents will become the core of programming

Anthropic Boris Cherny says the role of programmers is shifting from writing code to orchestrating agents "it's more about reviewing code than writing code" complex tasks still require manual coding, but those windows are shrinking. eventually, managing agents will become the core of programming

Haider.

137,906 次观看 • 1 年前

Grok Build is coming. Not autocomplete… a full coding agent. You describe it. Grok plans, codes, and debugs. Up to 8 agents run in parallel. Apps, sites, full repos. Built from plain English. Arena Mode picks the best output. The local CLI keeps your code private. This isn’t “help me code.” It just builds. xAI Grok

Grok Build is coming. Not autocomplete… a full coding agent. You describe it. Grok plans, codes, and debugs. Up to 8 agents run in parallel. Apps, sites, full repos. Built from plain English. Arena Mode picks the best output. The local CLI keeps your code private. This isn’t “help me code.” It just builds. xAI Grok

Mario Nawfal

193,923 次观看 • 3 个月前

Plannotator 0.22.0 is out. Code Review (is not dead yet): - Guided reviews give you a list of changes with semantic overviews, ordered by importance & where you need to spend your time reviewing. Inspired by Linear, this works for local and PR changes . You don't need the best models or high reasoning levels to use this! - Pi and Copilot are added as agent review providers. - A new default `git status` view is added. - A new `commits` view is added to easily navigate all commits and view their descriptions+changes.

Plannotator 0.22.0 is out. Code Review (is not dead yet): - Guided reviews give you a list of changes with semantic overviews, ordered by importance & where you need to spend your time reviewing. Inspired by Linear, this works for local and PR changes . You don't need the best models or high reasoning levels to use this! - Pi and Copilot are added as agent review providers. - A new default `git status` view is added. - A new `commits` view is added to easily navigate all commits and view their descriptions+changes.

plannotator

24,593 次观看 • 2 个月前

The bottleneck in coding is now the time it takes a human to review agent-generated code. But existing review UIs don't work well for agents. So we built a new one into Amp.

The bottleneck in coding is now the time it takes a human to review agent-generated code. But existing review UIs don't work well for agents. So we built a new one into Amp.

Beyang

63,082 次观看 • 10 个月前

📢Excited to release GoEx⚡️a runtime for LLM-generated actions like code, API calls, and more. Featuring "post-facto validation" for assessing LLM actions after execution 🔍 Key to our approach is "undo" 🔄 and "damage confinement" abstractions to manage unintended actions & risks. This paves the way for fully autonomous LLM agents, enhancing interaction between apps & services with human-out-of-loop🚀 Blog: Code: Paper:

📢Excited to release GoEx⚡️a runtime for LLM-generated actions like code, API calls, and more. Featuring "post-facto validation" for assessing LLM actions after execution 🔍 Key to our approach is "undo" 🔄 and "damage confinement" abstractions to manage unintended actions & risks. This paves the way for fully autonomous LLM agents, enhancing interaction between apps & services with human-out-of-loop🚀 Blog: Code: Paper:

Shishir Patil

58,071 次观看 • 2 年前

introducing greptile security agent it combines static analysis, sca, and ai agents to efficiently catch security flaws before merge. why did we build this? - coding agents have caused the frequency of security incidents to explode - neither agents nor deterministic methods alone are sufficient for detecting vulnerabilities - security review is best done in conjunction with regular code review because many vulns are really just logical issues with security consequences security review is turned on by default for free for all greptile users.

introducing greptile security agent it combines static analysis, sca, and ai agents to efficiently catch security flaws before merge. why did we build this? - coding agents have caused the frequency of security incidents to explode - neither agents nor deterministic methods alone are sufficient for detecting vulnerabilities - security review is best done in conjunction with regular code review because many vulns are really just logical issues with security consequences security review is turned on by default for free for all greptile users.

Daksh Gupta

33,973 次观看 • 1 个月前

Anthropic’s Boris Cherny argues that for certain modern, model-friendly codebases, especially TypeScript/React projects, coding is already effectively "solved". AI agents can write nearly 100% of the code, while humans shift from hand-coding to directing, reviewing, integrating, and scaling many small PRs at once.

Anthropic’s Boris Cherny argues that for certain modern, model-friendly codebases, especially TypeScript/React projects, coding is already effectively "solved". AI agents can write nearly 100% of the code, while humans shift from hand-coding to directing, reviewing, integrating, and scaling many small PRs at once.

Chubby♨️

32,117 次观看 • 4 个月前

What is the best LLM for agentic software engineering? Today, we're releasing The OpenHands Index to answer this question. It's the first broad-coverage benchmark for AI coding agents, comparing them on accuracy, cost, and runtime across 5 task domains.

What is the best LLM for agentic software engineering? Today, we're releasing The OpenHands Index to answer this question. It's the first broad-coverage benchmark for AI coding agents, comparing them on accuracy, cost, and runtime across 5 task domains.

OpenHands

31,780 次观看 • 7 个月前

Creator of Claude Code: "100% of our pull requests at Anrtopic are run by Claude Code. 80-90% of code review too. The feature I’m using the most for my agents is /loops. I’m not prompting Claude anymore - I’m building loops" in 1-hour podcast, Boris shows his setup, which helps him build the #1 coding tool of this year. Worth more than a $500 vibe-coding course.

Creator of Claude Code: "100% of our pull requests at Anrtopic are run by Claude Code. 80-90% of code review too. The feature I’m using the most for my agents is /loops. I’m not prompting Claude anymore - I’m building loops" in 1-hour podcast, Boris shows his setup, which helps him build the #1 coding tool of this year. Worth more than a $500 vibe-coding course.

Codez

105,879 次观看 • 2 个月前

Temporal CEO Samar Birwadker says GitHub was designed for humans, but is now at the mercy of agents. "Agents are starting to get more and more long-lived, more asynchronous, and more mission-critical." "For example, if you pick coding agents alone, is something like GitHub was designed for humans collaborate and create [pull requests] right now." "Now a lot of code is being generated by these agents, and they're the ones creating these PRs essentially, and even code review process is being automated by other agents." "So now this entire system backend, which is being built for human consumption, is now at the mercy of these agents kind of using it for their own coordination and collaboration."

Temporal CEO Samar Birwadker says GitHub was designed for humans, but is now at the mercy of agents. "Agents are starting to get more and more long-lived, more asynchronous, and more mission-critical." "For example, if you pick coding agents alone, is something like GitHub was designed for humans collaborate and create [pull requests] right now." "Now a lot of code is being generated by these agents, and they're the ones creating these PRs essentially, and even code review process is being automated by other agents." "So now this entire system backend, which is being built for human consumption, is now at the mercy of these agents kind of using it for their own coordination and collaboration."

MTS

26,902 次观看 • 3 个月前

How are coding agents changing software engineering? Yapped for 15 minutes about new Cursor data we published, including: 1. Why lines of code is an imperfect measure of AI progress 2. Balancing intelligence/cost/speed for models 3. Code reviews with "Mega PRs" (1000+ lines)

How are coding agents changing software engineering? Yapped for 15 minutes about new Cursor data we published, including: 1. Why lines of code is an imperfect measure of AI progress 2. Balancing intelligence/cost/speed for models 3. Code reviews with "Mega PRs" (1000+ lines)

Lee Robinson

59,013 次观看 • 3 个月前

If you are reviewing 100% of your AI-generated code by hand, you aren't moving fast enough. It's just impossible. Reviewing code has become the biggest bottleneck in software. Here is how to make this better:

If you are reviewing 100% of your AI-generated code by hand, you aren't moving fast enough. It's just impossible. Reviewing code has become the biggest bottleneck in software. Here is how to make this better:

Santiago

20,133 次观看 • 2 个月前

AI code reviews are promising, BUT they're hard to control and currently all closed source. That's why we built GPTLint: It's an automated code review tool powered by both ASTs and LLMs – the best part is it's a 100% OSS standard that works w/ any LLM 🔥

AI code reviews are promising, BUT they're hard to control and currently all closed source. That's why we built GPTLint: It's an automated code review tool powered by both ASTs and LLMs – the best part is it's a 100% OSS standard that works w/ any LLM 🔥

Travis Fischer

38,139 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨Gemini 3.0 Pro - ECP. one shot in 2 Min Holy Shit Guys Gemini made GAMEBOY with original games This is literally my favourite the level of detail is beyond any LLM till date , this is the best output i have ever seen Prompt and code pen link in thread

🚨Gemini 3.0 Pro - ECP. one shot in 2 Min Holy Shit Guys Gemini made GAMEBOY with original games This is literally my favourite the level of detail is beyond any LLM till date , this is the best output i have ever seen Prompt and code pen link in thread

Chetaslua

63,440 次观看 • 10 个月前

Head of OpenAI's API: "Codex is really good at reviewing code. Codex reviews all of our PRs. It makes code reviews go from a 10-15 minute task to sometimes a 2-3 minute task, because you have a bunch of suggestions already baked in. For small PRs, you actually don't even need people to review them, we trust Codex."

Head of OpenAI's API: "Codex is really good at reviewing code. Codex reviews all of our PRs. It makes code reviews go from a 10-15 minute task to sometimes a 2-3 minute task, because you have a bunch of suggestions already baked in. For small PRs, you actually don't even need people to review them, we trust Codex."

Lenny Rachitsky

38,764 次观看 • 6 个月前