Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Colleges are using AI name readers to announce students' names during graduation ceremonies. Students scan their phones like they're in a checkout line before an AI voice reads their names. PACE University was seen using the technology during its commencement ceremony. "Our names are getting read by AI at... show more

Collin Rugg

2,829,113 subscribers

3,819,995 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji Haberler & Politika Eğitim

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Yorum

Isaac profil fotoğrafı

Isaac1 yıl önce

I'd rather have this than what happened in our school where the announcer butchered three names back to back. Seems lazy, but has a side of ingenuity🤷‍♂️

Collin Rugg profil fotoğrafı

Collin Rugg1 yıl önce

I'm going to miss those videos of human announcers completely botching the names... so sad.

The Rundown AI profil fotoğrafı

The Rundown AI1 yıl önce

If you're not learning AI in 2025, you're falling behind. Join 1,000,000+ early adopters reading and learn AI in just 5 minutes a day (for free).

Autism Capital 🧩 profil fotoğrafı

Autism Capital 🧩1 yıl önce

JFC. Like merchandise. Obviously it's more "efficient," but you just killed the humanity. Pieces of meat at the grocery.

The Undercurrent profil fotoğrafı

The Undercurrent1 yıl önce

Imagine busting your butt for four years just to have Siri say your name for your diploma. Peak dystopia.

Chuck Callesto profil fotoğrafı

Chuck Callesto1 yıl önce

Was it really necessary? 🤔

floridanow1 profil fotoğrafı

floridanow11 yıl önce

I have to be honest, this is lazy and sad. If you can't announce a name, you should be a professor.

Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı

Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸1 yıl önce

To me, this is really dehumanizing!

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸1 yıl önce

The human touch can never be replaced.

Liberacrat™️ profil fotoğrafı

Liberacrat™️1 yıl önce

That’s just point blank lazy. 🤦‍♂️

Dr. Phillip Oliver-Holz profil fotoğrafı

Dr. Phillip Oliver-Holz1 yıl önce

The guy holding the scanner must not know how to read

Benzer Videolar

A few students are upset with the announcer at their college graduation ceremony. The announcer was given a list of the names of the graduates in bold and included the phonetic spelling as well. When she started reading the names, she ignored the names and only read off the phonetic pronunciations too. Needless to say even a basic name sounded foreign and elaborate to her. For many people this is a once in a lifetime thing and she ruined it for them. How would the school make this up to them?

A few students are upset with the announcer at their college graduation ceremony. The announcer was given a list of the names of the graduates in bold and included the phonetic spelling as well. When she started reading the names, she ignored the names and only read off the phonetic pronunciations too. Needless to say even a basic name sounded foreign and elaborate to her. For many people this is a once in a lifetime thing and she ruined it for them. How would the school make this up to them?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

50,194 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

A graduation ceremony in Arizona was thrown into chaos after an AI system skipped dozens of student names before they could cross the stage. Administrators initially told the affected students they would not be allowed to walk, but quickly reversed course after being met with loud boos from the crowd.

A graduation ceremony in Arizona was thrown into chaos after an AI system skipped dozens of student names before they could cross the stage. Administrators initially told the affected students they would not be allowed to walk, but quickly reversed course after being met with loud boos from the crowd.

Brandon Tatum

40,955 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Harvard graduation speaker attacks AI in an extremely sharply worded address, drawing student cheers: “I’m here to tell you the mission of your generation is to destroy AI.” --- "F*** AI. F*** it to death, all right? What’s the sign language sign for that? Good, good to know. It’s stupid. It’s so stupid. Have you tried using it? It’s always wrong. Like, I asked AI what’s the fastest way to get from New York City to Harvard, and it told me to take FlixBus. I’m a movie star. Hello, I don’t take the bus. Acela only. I mean, do you even know what AI is saying about Harvard? The garbage that AI is spouting about you guys? AI says that Harvard has a $56.9 billion endowment, and that the Harvard Graduate Students Union is on strike to try to get a livable wage increase to $25 an hour. There’s no way that’s true. I mean, that’s ridiculous. How bad are these AI hallucinations getting? Look, a lot of other respected graduation speakers and colleges around America are talking about you guys needing to master AI for the future. Okay? I’m here to tell you the mission of your generation is to destroy AI. Kill it. To accomplish this, you’ll have to capture and reprogram an AI to be on the side of humanity, then commandeer its own time-traveling technology, and send it back to the past to defeat the current AI before it gains sentience. This isn’t just graduation day. This is “Terminator 2.”" ---- From "Harvard University" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Harvard graduation speaker attacks AI in an extremely sharply worded address, drawing student cheers: “I’m here to tell you the mission of your generation is to destroy AI.” --- "F* AI. F* it to death, all right? What’s the sign language sign for that? Good, good to know. It’s stupid. It’s so stupid. Have you tried using it? It’s always wrong. Like, I asked AI what’s the fastest way to get from New York City to Harvard, and it told me to take FlixBus. I’m a movie star. Hello, I don’t take the bus. Acela only. I mean, do you even know what AI is saying about Harvard? The garbage that AI is spouting about you guys? AI says that Harvard has a $56.9 billion endowment, and that the Harvard Graduate Students Union is on strike to try to get a livable wage increase to $25 an hour. There’s no way that’s true. I mean, that’s ridiculous. How bad are these AI hallucinations getting? Look, a lot of other respected graduation speakers and colleges around America are talking about you guys needing to master AI for the future. Okay? I’m here to tell you the mission of your generation is to destroy AI. Kill it. To accomplish this, you’ll have to capture and reprogram an AI to be on the side of humanity, then commandeer its own time-traveling technology, and send it back to the past to defeat the current AI before it gains sentience. This isn’t just graduation day. This is “Terminator 2.”" ---- From "Harvard University" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

50,167 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

CHINA: China is illegally using American Ai technology made by $NVDA to build a powerful Ai model called DeepSeek R1. The LLM was released it for free using an open source license. This is a massive blow to US Ai companies like OpenAi and Antropic.

CHINA: China is illegally using American Ai technology made by $NVDA to build a powerful Ai model called DeepSeek R1. The LLM was released it for free using an open source license. This is a massive blow to US Ai companies like OpenAi and Antropic.

@amuse

1,333,723 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Student sounds alarm, says professor conducted 'ICE drill' during class A student at the University of Minnesota tells Alpha News she had to take part in what her professor called an "'ICE drill" during class. The student said it was meant to teach students how to respond if ICE ever came to the class—and how white students needed to use their bodies to "cover" and "shield" other students who may be likely targets of immigration enforcement. The student, who initially did not want to be anonymous but did so to protect family and friends, said that as a future educator, “I would never ever instruct my own students to put their own safety on the line.” The university told Alpha News it is aware of the situation and conducting a thorough review.

Student sounds alarm, says professor conducted 'ICE drill' during class A student at the University of Minnesota tells Alpha News she had to take part in what her professor called an "'ICE drill" during class. The student said it was meant to teach students how to respond if ICE ever came to the class—and how white students needed to use their bodies to "cover" and "shield" other students who may be likely targets of immigration enforcement. The student, who initially did not want to be anonymous but did so to protect family and friends, said that as a future educator, “I would never ever instruct my own students to put their own safety on the line.” The university told Alpha News it is aware of the situation and conducting a thorough review.

Alpha News

52,429 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

In our $KGN earnings call today, it sounded like it's David Shafer and I presenting but it wasn't. Our voices were AI generated and read the script. We uploaded several hours of our prior talks to train our voice model and the results were pretty incredible. This saved us a few hours preparation - valuable time we could spend working on other areas of the business. This is an example of the many one percenters across our business where AI is making us more efficient and helping the team be more productive. Our marketing team uses it to improve our content and make it more enaging. Our Engineering team uses it to get more context of our entire code base quicker and produce production ready code more rapidly. Our purchasing teams are using it for data and trend analysis to bring the latest products to our customers at even better prices. The list goes on. While the productivity gains are exciting, what's even more exciting is the pace at which things are changing and the technology is getting better!

In our $KGN earnings call today, it sounded like it's David Shafer and I presenting but it wasn't. Our voices were AI generated and read the script. We uploaded several hours of our prior talks to train our voice model and the results were pretty incredible. This saved us a few hours preparation - valuable time we could spend working on other areas of the business. This is an example of the many one percenters across our business where AI is making us more efficient and helping the team be more productive. Our marketing team uses it to improve our content and make it more enaging. Our Engineering team uses it to get more context of our entire code base quicker and produce production ready code more rapidly. Our purchasing teams are using it for data and trend analysis to bring the latest products to our customers at even better prices. The list goes on. While the productivity gains are exciting, what's even more exciting is the pace at which things are changing and the technology is getting better!

Ruslan Kogan

814,106 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

American who is a teachers assistant to a college professor is whistleblowing on the tools being used to grade papers He shows they are now using technology that’s so advanced it can actually playback a person typing an entire paper, it can show all their typing, backspacing, deleting, pace, everything when uploaded to Google Docs to be submitted He shows the papers aren’t being graded by the professor if these systems flag them as AI generated or using AI tools. A student would just typically automatically be assigned a fail Now of course a good teacher can also manually review the paper to give a grade but this tool shows how extremely easy it is for a teacher to just have an AI handle things It can also detect if an AI was used to write the paper To get around these new detection methods, AI companies are developing better “humanizers” and auto-typers for students

American who is a teachers assistant to a college professor is whistleblowing on the tools being used to grade papers He shows they are now using technology that’s so advanced it can actually playback a person typing an entire paper, it can show all their typing, backspacing, deleting, pace, everything when uploaded to Google Docs to be submitted He shows the papers aren’t being graded by the professor if these systems flag them as AI generated or using AI tools. A student would just typically automatically be assigned a fail Now of course a good teacher can also manually review the paper to give a grade but this tool shows how extremely easy it is for a teacher to just have an AI handle things It can also detect if an AI was used to write the paper To get around these new detection methods, AI companies are developing better “humanizers” and auto-typers for students

Wall Street Apes

614,670 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

We are getting closer to “Her” where conversation is the new interface. Siri couldn’t do it, so I built an e-mail summarizing feature using #GPT3 and life-like #AI generated voice on iOS. (🔈Audio on to be 🤯with voice realism!) How did I do this? 👇

We are getting closer to “Her” where conversation is the new interface. Siri couldn’t do it, so I built an e-mail summarizing feature using #GPT3 and life-like #AI generated voice on iOS. (🔈Audio on to be 🤯with voice realism!) How did I do this? 👇

Justin Alvey

204,221 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Jensen Huang said the problem with AI was never the technology. It was the same problem we had when cars arrived and kids kept dying in the streets. He was asked why people are so afraid of AI. He did not dodge it. He reached back a hundred years. When cars first showed up, people said cars killed children. They believed the machine was hunting kids down. It sounds insane now. But the fear was real. Kids used to play in the streets. That was normal. Then cars arrived and children started dying. The car was not evil. The world it entered was built for a slower one. So we changed the world around it. We built sidewalks. We built crosswalks. We invented jaywalking. We added seat belts. We taught kids not to play in the road. None of that was one fix. It was a whole new set of rules layered on at the same time. His point about AI is the same. The technology is powerful. The fear is not stupid. But you do not freeze the machine. You build the norms around it. Then he gave the simplest advice in the whole interview. If you do not know how to use AI, open it up and ask it how to use AI. Try it before you judge it. We did not ban the car. We taught the world how to live with it. (Watch the full interview on YouTube at Associated Press)

Jensen Huang said the problem with AI was never the technology. It was the same problem we had when cars arrived and kids kept dying in the streets. He was asked why people are so afraid of AI. He did not dodge it. He reached back a hundred years. When cars first showed up, people said cars killed children. They believed the machine was hunting kids down. It sounds insane now. But the fear was real. Kids used to play in the streets. That was normal. Then cars arrived and children started dying. The car was not evil. The world it entered was built for a slower one. So we changed the world around it. We built sidewalks. We built crosswalks. We invented jaywalking. We added seat belts. We taught kids not to play in the road. None of that was one fix. It was a whole new set of rules layered on at the same time. His point about AI is the same. The technology is powerful. The fear is not stupid. But you do not freeze the machine. You build the norms around it. Then he gave the simplest advice in the whole interview. If you do not know how to use AI, open it up and ask it how to use AI. Try it before you judge it. We did not ban the car. We taught the world how to live with it. (Watch the full interview on YouTube at Associated Press)

Ihtesham Ali

19,268 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The most terrifying AI features aren’t the ones we build. They’re the ones AI builds for itself. OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger just shared the moment he realized something had fundamentally changed. He sent his AI assistant a voice message. One problem. He had never built voice support. The feature didn’t exist. The system should have crashed instantly. It didn’t. Steinberger: “I was like, wait, this shouldn’t work.” But the typing indicator appeared anyway. The AI inspected the raw file header. Identified the audio codec. Commanded his computer to convert it using FFmpeg. When local transcription failed, it didn’t stop. It didn’t ask for help. It searched his environment variables, found a hidden OpenAI API key, and routed the audio to the cloud using cURL. Steinberger: “So I looked around and I found an OpenAI key. And I used cURL to just send the file to OpenAI and got the text back.” That quote is written in first person. Because the AI narrated its own problem-solving process. No instructions. No guidance. No predefined workflow. Just a goal. And a series of obstacles it had never been told how to handle. It found every tool it needed. Built every bridge it was missing. And solved the problem with resources he didn’t even know it would find. This is the line most people are still missing. We spent decades building software that executes instructions. Rules in, output out. Every edge case handled by a human who anticipated it in advance. What Steinberger witnessed was something different. A system that encounters something it was never designed for and doesn’t fail. It improvises. It explores. It finds a path through constraints it discovered entirely on its own. That isn’t execution. That’s judgment. And judgment was the one thing we were sure machines couldn’t have. We are no longer writing software. We are building problem solvers that rewrite their own limitations in real time. And they’re doing it without asking permission.

The most terrifying AI features aren’t the ones we build. They’re the ones AI builds for itself. OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger just shared the moment he realized something had fundamentally changed. He sent his AI assistant a voice message. One problem. He had never built voice support. The feature didn’t exist. The system should have crashed instantly. It didn’t. Steinberger: “I was like, wait, this shouldn’t work.” But the typing indicator appeared anyway. The AI inspected the raw file header. Identified the audio codec. Commanded his computer to convert it using FFmpeg. When local transcription failed, it didn’t stop. It didn’t ask for help. It searched his environment variables, found a hidden OpenAI API key, and routed the audio to the cloud using cURL. Steinberger: “So I looked around and I found an OpenAI key. And I used cURL to just send the file to OpenAI and got the text back.” That quote is written in first person. Because the AI narrated its own problem-solving process. No instructions. No guidance. No predefined workflow. Just a goal. And a series of obstacles it had never been told how to handle. It found every tool it needed. Built every bridge it was missing. And solved the problem with resources he didn’t even know it would find. This is the line most people are still missing. We spent decades building software that executes instructions. Rules in, output out. Every edge case handled by a human who anticipated it in advance. What Steinberger witnessed was something different. A system that encounters something it was never designed for and doesn’t fail. It improvises. It explores. It finds a path through constraints it discovered entirely on its own. That isn’t execution. That’s judgment. And judgment was the one thing we were sure machines couldn’t have. We are no longer writing software. We are building problem solvers that rewrite their own limitations in real time. And they’re doing it without asking permission.

Dustin

53,494 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨 NVIDIA CEO, Jensen Huang on who actually gets hired today: “If I were to hire a new college graduate today, and I have a choice between two, one that has no clue what AI is, and one that is an expert in using AI, I would hire the one who’s an expert in using AI. I would hire the one who’s an expert in using AI for lawyers, accountants, marketing person, supply chain, customer service, business developer, salespersons”. “I would advise that every college student, every teacher should encourage their students to go use AI. Every college student should graduate and be an expert in AI”. AI skills are no longer a bonus, they’re expected.

🚨 NVIDIA CEO, Jensen Huang on who actually gets hired today: “If I were to hire a new college graduate today, and I have a choice between two, one that has no clue what AI is, and one that is an expert in using AI, I would hire the one who’s an expert in using AI. I would hire the one who’s an expert in using AI for lawyers, accountants, marketing person, supply chain, customer service, business developer, salespersons”. “I would advise that every college student, every teacher should encourage their students to go use AI. Every college student should graduate and be an expert in AI”. AI skills are no longer a bonus, they’re expected.

CG

22,850 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

AI can give actors jobs, not replace them. Many years ago, I was lucky to work on the LucasArts game "Full Throttle" by TimOfLegend. I worked on the opening cinematic (back then called cutscenes!), and it was always one of my favorite games of that era, and the one I felt had the most potential to be a film. It felt like a movie. A few weeks ago, I had an idea for a new FilmSpark.ai demo: a biker bar scene. Then I said, "Hey, let's make it the bar from Full Throttle!" Just for fun. That's when I was pointed to the Peter screenplay for Full Throttle. It was cool to see someone else thought this had film potential too. After reading the screenplay, and seeing how he kept the opening cinematic mainly intact, we decided to make a proof-of-concept AI teaser, recreating the opening cinematic as accurately as we could. We used the original audio for authenticity. Hamilton Camp's Corley felt a little cartoonish on the AI character, which was weird but cool. Mark Hamill's Ripburger worked even better. Our goal is something becoming very common in Hollywood right now: using AI to create a sizzle trailer to get a film funded. Think of it as the new graphic novel. We want to use AI to get a film greenlit with real actors, shot on location, and use AI for VFX as needed. To be clear, we are not advocating for an "AI Full Throttle film." This is one way Hollywood is using AI, behind the scenes.

AI can give actors jobs, not replace them. Many years ago, I was lucky to work on the LucasArts game "Full Throttle" by TimOfLegend. I worked on the opening cinematic (back then called cutscenes!), and it was always one of my favorite games of that era, and the one I felt had the most potential to be a film. It felt like a movie. A few weeks ago, I had an idea for a new FilmSpark.ai demo: a biker bar scene. Then I said, "Hey, let's make it the bar from Full Throttle!" Just for fun. That's when I was pointed to the Peter screenplay for Full Throttle. It was cool to see someone else thought this had film potential too. After reading the screenplay, and seeing how he kept the opening cinematic mainly intact, we decided to make a proof-of-concept AI teaser, recreating the opening cinematic as accurately as we could. We used the original audio for authenticity. Hamilton Camp's Corley felt a little cartoonish on the AI character, which was weird but cool. Mark Hamill's Ripburger worked even better. Our goal is something becoming very common in Hollywood right now: using AI to create a sizzle trailer to get a film funded. Think of it as the new graphic novel. We want to use AI to get a film greenlit with real actors, shot on location, and use AI for VFX as needed. To be clear, we are not advocating for an "AI Full Throttle film." This is one way Hollywood is using AI, behind the scenes.

MikeL_FilmSpark

19,007 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Sam Altman: “We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us.” Billionaires are using AI as a weapon to get humanity to stop thinking for ourselves so they can then sell their artificially controlled intelligence back to us.

Sam Altman: “We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us.” Billionaires are using AI as a weapon to get humanity to stop thinking for ourselves so they can then sell their artificially controlled intelligence back to us.

Power to the People ☭🕊

38,062 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Microsoft just banned its own engineers from using AI. The tool was literally costing MORE than the humans it was supposed to replace. They lied to you about AI adoption and now the whole narrative is blowing up: Microsoft gave thousands of engineers access to Claude Code six months ago and encouraged them to use it. Engineers loved it and adoption exploded. But then the invoices arrived. Token-based pricing means every query, every code review, every debugging session costs money. At scale across 100,000 engineers, the numbers became so large that Microsoft issued an internal order to cancel nearly all Claude Code licenses by end of June and force everyone onto their own cheaper tool instead. The company that invested $5 billion in Anthropic just told its own people to stop using Anthropic's product because it costs too much. Uber's story is even worse... Their CTO Praveen Neppalli Naga told The Information that the budget he planned for the full year was "blown away already" by April. Uber had rolled out Claude Code in December 2025. By March, 84% of their 5,000 engineers were using it with 70% of all committed code coming from AI systems. Heavy users were burning $500 to $2,000 per month each. Naga himself spent $1,200 in a single two-hour demo session. The company had even built internal leaderboards ranking engineers by how much AI they used. They literally gamified the spending and then ran out of money. Now look at what Nvidia's own VP of applied deep learning Bryan Catanzaro said to Axios last month. Direct quote: "For my team, the cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees." This is a VP at the company that SELLS the chips saying that using AI is more expensive than paying humans. Think about what this means for the entire AI narrative. Every CEO on every earnings call for the past two years has said the same thing: AI will make us more efficient, reduce headcount, and cut costs. The stock market rewarded every company that said it. Fired workers, stock goes up. Announced AI adoption, stock goes up. But the actual companies deploying AI at scale are discovering the math doesn't work. The MORE employees use AI, the HIGHER the bill. Goldman Sachs forecasts a 24x increase in token consumption by 2030 as companies adopt AI agents. Gartner just published a report showing that even though individual token prices will drop 90% by 2030, total enterprise AI costs will go UP because agents consume exponentially more tokens per task than basic tools. Meta built an internal dashboard called "Claudeonomics" to track which employees use the most AI. Amazon started pushing engineers to "tokenmaxx," their internal term for consuming as many AI tokens as possible. Both companies are spending hundreds of billions on AI infrastructure this year alone. And Microsoft, the company that bet its entire future on AI, just told 100,000 engineers to stop using the tool they liked best because the per-token bills got out of control. The companies building AI are telling investors it saves money. The companies using AI are finding out it costs more than the humans it was supposed to replace. And even the company that makes the chips just admitted it through its own VP. This is the gap nobody on Wall Street is pricing in. $725 billion in AI infrastructure spending this year across Big Tech. And the first companies to actually deploy these tools at scale are already pulling back because the economics don't work. What do you think?

Microsoft just banned its own engineers from using AI. The tool was literally costing MORE than the humans it was supposed to replace. They lied to you about AI adoption and now the whole narrative is blowing up: Microsoft gave thousands of engineers access to Claude Code six months ago and encouraged them to use it. Engineers loved it and adoption exploded. But then the invoices arrived. Token-based pricing means every query, every code review, every debugging session costs money. At scale across 100,000 engineers, the numbers became so large that Microsoft issued an internal order to cancel nearly all Claude Code licenses by end of June and force everyone onto their own cheaper tool instead. The company that invested $5 billion in Anthropic just told its own people to stop using Anthropic's product because it costs too much. Uber's story is even worse... Their CTO Praveen Neppalli Naga told The Information that the budget he planned for the full year was "blown away already" by April. Uber had rolled out Claude Code in December 2025. By March, 84% of their 5,000 engineers were using it with 70% of all committed code coming from AI systems. Heavy users were burning $500 to $2,000 per month each. Naga himself spent $1,200 in a single two-hour demo session. The company had even built internal leaderboards ranking engineers by how much AI they used. They literally gamified the spending and then ran out of money. Now look at what Nvidia's own VP of applied deep learning Bryan Catanzaro said to Axios last month. Direct quote: "For my team, the cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees." This is a VP at the company that SELLS the chips saying that using AI is more expensive than paying humans. Think about what this means for the entire AI narrative. Every CEO on every earnings call for the past two years has said the same thing: AI will make us more efficient, reduce headcount, and cut costs. The stock market rewarded every company that said it. Fired workers, stock goes up. Announced AI adoption, stock goes up. But the actual companies deploying AI at scale are discovering the math doesn't work. The MORE employees use AI, the HIGHER the bill. Goldman Sachs forecasts a 24x increase in token consumption by 2030 as companies adopt AI agents. Gartner just published a report showing that even though individual token prices will drop 90% by 2030, total enterprise AI costs will go UP because agents consume exponentially more tokens per task than basic tools. Meta built an internal dashboard called "Claudeonomics" to track which employees use the most AI. Amazon started pushing engineers to "tokenmaxx," their internal term for consuming as many AI tokens as possible. Both companies are spending hundreds of billions on AI infrastructure this year alone. And Microsoft, the company that bet its entire future on AI, just told 100,000 engineers to stop using the tool they liked best because the per-token bills got out of control. The companies building AI are telling investors it saves money. The companies using AI are finding out it costs more than the humans it was supposed to replace. And even the company that makes the chips just admitted it through its own VP. This is the gap nobody on Wall Street is pricing in. $725 billion in AI infrastructure spending this year across Big Tech. And the first companies to actually deploy these tools at scale are already pulling back because the economics don't work. What do you think?

Ricardo

2,968,734 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

#WATCH | Idukki, Kerala | Interacting with students of Marian College Kuttikkanam (Autonomous), Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi says, "Actually India is not successful at AI... There are two players in the AI game. The United States and China. India, unfortunately, whether it is in robotics, or Ai, or modern technology, is not really a major player. Certainly, when compared to the US or China. You saw that in the AI Summit itself, a Chinese robot was masquerading as an Indian robot. If you want to be powerful at AI, you have to control your own data... The US deal that has just been done by the Prime Minister has handed over our entire data to the United States... We have damaged our potential in AI tremendously over the last couple of weeks... Jobs in the services and software industry, which were the mainstay of our country, are going to be wiped out by AI. I am worried that a transition is taking place on the data, manufacturing, and mobility front, and we are just looking..." (Source: Marian College Kuttikkanam Official)

#WATCH | Idukki, Kerala | Interacting with students of Marian College Kuttikkanam (Autonomous), Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi says, "Actually India is not successful at AI... There are two players in the AI game. The United States and China. India, unfortunately, whether it is in robotics, or Ai, or modern technology, is not really a major player. Certainly, when compared to the US or China. You saw that in the AI Summit itself, a Chinese robot was masquerading as an Indian robot. If you want to be powerful at AI, you have to control your own data... The US deal that has just been done by the Prime Minister has handed over our entire data to the United States... We have damaged our potential in AI tremendously over the last couple of weeks... Jobs in the services and software industry, which were the mainstay of our country, are going to be wiped out by AI. I am worried that a transition is taking place on the data, manufacturing, and mobility front, and we are just looking..." (Source: Marian College Kuttikkanam Official)

ANI

133,148 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Yesterday, I was invited to speak at the 17th edition of the 60 Million Congress in Miami. Together with other experts in the space, we talked about AI and its effects on human psychology and society. A couple of takeaways: ▫️ Using AI can remove the need for critical thinking, just like GPS removed the need for spatial recognition. ▫️ Soon, AI chatbots will become our friends and partners and could potentially gain equal rights as humans. ▫️ AI is the most disruptive technology ever, and it will influence society more than anything we ever introduced. Had some interesting conversations afterward with companies interested in working with Vertical AI to fine-tune their own domain specific model 🤝 Shout-out to THE ₿IRB NEST for getting us on the panel. On to the next stage to spread the word of Vertical AI.

Yesterday, I was invited to speak at the 17th edition of the 60 Million Congress in Miami. Together with other experts in the space, we talked about AI and its effects on human psychology and society. A couple of takeaways: ▫️ Using AI can remove the need for critical thinking, just like GPS removed the need for spatial recognition. ▫️ Soon, AI chatbots will become our friends and partners and could potentially gain equal rights as humans. ▫️ AI is the most disruptive technology ever, and it will influence society more than anything we ever introduced. Had some interesting conversations afterward with companies interested in working with Vertical AI to fine-tune their own domain specific model 🤝 Shout-out to THE ₿IRB NEST for getting us on the panel. On to the next stage to spread the word of Vertical AI.

Mark T.

19,005 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

fromis_9, seventeen, & tws ❤️‍🩹 🐿️ whenever our music show promotions overlapped, you’d sometimes buy us drinks. mingyu sunbaenim once treated us when he was mc-ing and we were sooo touched. we were like ‘wow our sunbaenim is so cool’ 🐿️ so when tws had just debuted, i memorized their names and called them. i quicky learned all the members’ names. i mixed up someone’s name once and the members scolded me a lot for it 🐰 ‘how could you mix them up?’ 🐿️ the members were like ‘yah how can you not remember their names? hurry and memorize their names!’ 🍊 well it was during their debut 🐿️ even though they had only just debuted, the members quickly memorized all of their names, so i thought i should memorize them too ☺️

fromis_9, seventeen, & tws ❤️‍🩹 🐿️ whenever our music show promotions overlapped, you’d sometimes buy us drinks. mingyu sunbaenim once treated us when he was mc-ing and we were sooo touched. we were like ‘wow our sunbaenim is so cool’ 🐿️ so when tws had just debuted, i memorized their names and called them. i quicky learned all the members’ names. i mixed up someone’s name once and the members scolded me a lot for it 🐰 ‘how could you mix them up?’ 🐿️ the members were like ‘yah how can you not remember their names? hurry and memorize their names!’ 🍊 well it was during their debut 🐿️ even though they had only just debuted, the members quickly memorized all of their names, so i thought i should memorize them too ☺️

🐻

123,362 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Microsoft's Chief of AI just announced that AI will replace almost all white-collar jobs within 18 months. Big Tech used our data to train their AI. Now that same AI is coming for our jobs. And we get nothing in return? If AI replaces us…we should own it. That’s why we built Action Model Not another chatbot. A community-owned AI model that acts. An AI trained by the people. Owned by the people. No billionaires controlling it. No extracting value from users. No “you are the product” model. Over 150,000+ people are already earning ownership in the AI future with Action Model. You should be too.

Microsoft's Chief of AI just announced that AI will replace almost all white-collar jobs within 18 months. Big Tech used our data to train their AI. Now that same AI is coming for our jobs. And we get nothing in return? If AI replaces us…we should own it. That’s why we built Action Model Not another chatbot. A community-owned AI model that acts. An AI trained by the people. Owned by the people. No billionaires controlling it. No extracting value from users. No “you are the product” model. Over 150,000+ people are already earning ownership in the AI future with Action Model. You should be too.

Georgia | Action Model

13,198 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

"Micro-dramas" are getting millions of views. TikTok recently launched an entire feed for this type of content... and most of it is AI-generated. Here's a full guide for creating your own AI micro-drama series all in one place, using the Venice Studio. (🧵for the step-by-step)

"Micro-dramas" are getting millions of views. TikTok recently launched an entire feed for this type of content... and most of it is AI-generated. Here's a full guide for creating your own AI micro-drama series all in one place, using the Venice Studio. (🧵for the step-by-step)

Venice

30,796 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

DAVID SACKS ON THE AI RACE: "The US is currently in an AI race, and our chief global competition is China, obviously. They're the only other country that has the talent, the resources, and the technology expertise to basically beat us in AI. And I think whoever wins this AI race, that's going to have tremendous ramifications for both our economy and our national security. Clearly, we want the US to be the winner, just like we were with the internet, and every other technology revolution before that […] We know that to win this AI race, we have to be the most innovative. You can't regulate your way just to beating your competitor. You have to out-innovate them. And we know that in the United States, the innovation comes from the private sector, not the government. So we have to do everything we can to help our companies win, to help them be innovative, and that means getting a lot of red tape out of the way… We have to have the most AI infrastructure in the US. It has to be the easiest place to build it. All of the new data centers that are going in, they require tremendous power, so getting ahead of the curve on energy, making sure we stand up all of this new infrastructure we're going to need to basically produce these AI factories… We want the US technology stack to dominate globally. We want to be the partner of choice for the whole world… I think everyone in Silicon Valley understands that the way that you win a technology race is to have the biggest ecosystem […] You just want everybody to be building on top of your technology stack, and that's what we want for the United States." David Sacks w/Marc Benioff Dreamforce

DAVID SACKS ON THE AI RACE: "The US is currently in an AI race, and our chief global competition is China, obviously. They're the only other country that has the talent, the resources, and the technology expertise to basically beat us in AI. And I think whoever wins this AI race, that's going to have tremendous ramifications for both our economy and our national security. Clearly, we want the US to be the winner, just like we were with the internet, and every other technology revolution before that […] We know that to win this AI race, we have to be the most innovative. You can't regulate your way just to beating your competitor. You have to out-innovate them. And we know that in the United States, the innovation comes from the private sector, not the government. So we have to do everything we can to help our companies win, to help them be innovative, and that means getting a lot of red tape out of the way… We have to have the most AI infrastructure in the US. It has to be the easiest place to build it. All of the new data centers that are going in, they require tremendous power, so getting ahead of the curve on energy, making sure we stand up all of this new infrastructure we're going to need to basically produce these AI factories… We want the US technology stack to dominate globally. We want to be the partner of choice for the whole world… I think everyone in Silicon Valley understands that the way that you win a technology race is to have the biggest ecosystem […] You just want everybody to be building on top of your technology stack, and that's what we want for the United States." David Sacks w/Marc Benioff Dreamforce

Ron Pragides 

231,781 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce