Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Colorado AG Phil Weiser: Harmeet Dhillon needs a refresher course on constitutional law. If you listened to what she said there, you would think it’s well established that a law like Colorado’s law banning large-capacity magazines is blatantly unconstitutional. She could not be further from the truth. She mentioned...

Acyn's profile picture

Acyn

754,207 subscribers

44,818 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsHealth & Wellness
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Phang: It is a fundamental premise of the law that there is no requirement that a criminal defendant be forced to testify to explain away the government’s evidence. Lindsay Hallagan went to law school and ostensibly knows better, but she’s so stupid that she made that misstatement of the law to the grand jury.
0:56

Phang: It is a fundamental premise of the law that there is no requirement that a criminal defendant be forced to testify to explain away the government’s evidence. Lindsay Hallagan went to law school and ostensibly knows better, but she’s so stupid that she made that misstatement of the law to the grand jury.

Acyn

109,577 views • 8 months ago

Does anybody know what Kemi Badenoch actually means? Because I don't think even she knows what she means 🤷‍♂️ KB, "You cannot change your sex, you can change your legal sex" Ed Balls, "So you are saying you are happy with people changing their legal sex?" KB, "Yes" EB, "You want to change the law to be clear that someone can change their legal sex" KB, "When we do this we will be able to distinguish between sex and gender" EB, "I assumed you were going to legislate that people cannot change their sex at birth, but you're telling us that you're going to change the law so somebody can change their legal sex" KB, "No no no I'm sorry Ed no that's not what I said" EB, "That's what you just said" KB, "We're clarifying the law to saw that the Equality Act when it refers to sex refers to biological sex.. The gender recognition.. We need to move away from the term legal sex and talk about gender" EB, "You used that term, not me" KB, "Yes yes because that is what the law is now. I'm talking about what the law is and how we're trying to clarify it and make it clearer for the future"
1:28

Does anybody know what Kemi Badenoch actually means? Because I don't think even she knows what she means 🤷‍♂️ KB, "You cannot change your sex, you can change your legal sex" Ed Balls, "So you are saying you are happy with people changing their legal sex?" KB, "Yes" EB, "You want to change the law to be clear that someone can change their legal sex" KB, "When we do this we will be able to distinguish between sex and gender" EB, "I assumed you were going to legislate that people cannot change their sex at birth, but you're telling us that you're going to change the law so somebody can change their legal sex" KB, "No no no I'm sorry Ed no that's not what I said" EB, "That's what you just said" KB, "We're clarifying the law to saw that the Equality Act when it refers to sex refers to biological sex.. The gender recognition.. We need to move away from the term legal sex and talk about gender" EB, "You used that term, not me" KB, "Yes yes because that is what the law is now. I'm talking about what the law is and how we're trying to clarify it and make it clearer for the future"

Farrukh

930,092 views • 2 years ago

Democrat Rosa DeLauro , (Connecticut), says Lee Zeldin’s budget request reads like a Climate Change Denier’s Manifesto. She claims Lee Zeldin is a climate denier. The EPA has to follow the law. Yet the Congresswoman doesn’t seem to know what the law is. Zeldin asks her if she knows what Section 202 Clean Air Act is. She doesn’t seem to know. It’s the law that the EPA has to follow. He can’t change what the law says. That’s up to Congress. The Clean Air Act was established in 1963 under President Lyndon B Johnson. It has been amended many times through Congress. DeLauro seems to be angry that Zeldin is not following what climate hoaxers are claiming is happening. He’s trying to explain to her that he must follow the Section 202 Clean Air Act. If something isn’t in there he can’t enforce it. She wants a fight, she thinks she’ll make him look bad, she’s wrong. Zeldin stood his ground. In the end, her theatrics make her look as ridiculous as that streak of purple hair on her head.
3:05

Democrat Rosa DeLauro , (Connecticut), says Lee Zeldin’s budget request reads like a Climate Change Denier’s Manifesto. She claims Lee Zeldin is a climate denier. The EPA has to follow the law. Yet the Congresswoman doesn’t seem to know what the law is. Zeldin asks her if she knows what Section 202 Clean Air Act is. She doesn’t seem to know. It’s the law that the EPA has to follow. He can’t change what the law says. That’s up to Congress. The Clean Air Act was established in 1963 under President Lyndon B Johnson. It has been amended many times through Congress. DeLauro seems to be angry that Zeldin is not following what climate hoaxers are claiming is happening. He’s trying to explain to her that he must follow the Section 202 Clean Air Act. If something isn’t in there he can’t enforce it. She wants a fight, she thinks she’ll make him look bad, she’s wrong. Zeldin stood his ground. In the end, her theatrics make her look as ridiculous as that streak of purple hair on her head.

MAGA PATRIOT TGM (TERI)

20,137 views • 2 months ago

Not only should it not be controversial that I refuse to give myself powers that are not clearly stated in federal law, but that should absolutely be the standard, the constant of how an EPA Administrator approaches this position. Strictly adhere to the single best reading of the law pursuant to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Loper Bright, and don’t ever get creative in trying to give myself any powers that the law hasn’t given me. If Congress wants me to do something other than the single best reading of the law, then they should try to change the law instead of demanding that I circumvent statute.
3:25

Not only should it not be controversial that I refuse to give myself powers that are not clearly stated in federal law, but that should absolutely be the standard, the constant of how an EPA Administrator approaches this position. Strictly adhere to the single best reading of the law pursuant to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Loper Bright, and don’t ever get creative in trying to give myself any powers that the law hasn’t given me. If Congress wants me to do something other than the single best reading of the law, then they should try to change the law instead of demanding that I circumvent statute.

Lee Zeldin

105,308 views • 1 month ago

"DHS is a law enforcement agency. If Senator Alex Padilla does not like the immigration law on the books, he should try and change it instead of demonizing our law enforcement efforts." Tricia McLaughlin There are no “indiscriminate stops” being made. The Supreme Court simply applied longstanding precedent regarding what qualifies as “reasonable suspicion” under the Fourth Amendment. DHS enforces federal immigration law without fear, favor, or prejudice.
0:43

"DHS is a law enforcement agency. If Senator Alex Padilla does not like the immigration law on the books, he should try and change it instead of demonizing our law enforcement efforts." Tricia McLaughlin There are no “indiscriminate stops” being made. The Supreme Court simply applied longstanding precedent regarding what qualifies as “reasonable suspicion” under the Fourth Amendment. DHS enforces federal immigration law without fear, favor, or prejudice.

Homeland Security

61,915 views • 10 months ago

Paul Mecurio: “ For some people, having guys with masks and no cameras and very aggressive tactics and at times not having a search warrant scares people.” Scott Jennings: “What is she afraid of? … If you do not like a federal law, if you do not like the way a federal law is being enforced, what we do in this country is call our congressman, call our legislators and say, let's change the law, let's change the policies. What we do not do is drive our cars into and over the people who are simply there enforcing the laws that are on the books.” Paul Mecurio: “What about protests?” Scott Jennings: “I have no problem with protests. That's not protest. That is impeding federal law enforcement. Again, it's a perfectly legitimate political discussion.” Paul Mecurio: “She wasn't impeding because they could get around.” These leftists are disgusting, sick individuals.
1:28

Paul Mecurio: “ For some people, having guys with masks and no cameras and very aggressive tactics and at times not having a search warrant scares people.” Scott Jennings: “What is she afraid of? … If you do not like a federal law, if you do not like the way a federal law is being enforced, what we do in this country is call our congressman, call our legislators and say, let's change the law, let's change the policies. What we do not do is drive our cars into and over the people who are simply there enforcing the laws that are on the books.” Paul Mecurio: “What about protests?” Scott Jennings: “I have no problem with protests. That's not protest. That is impeding federal law enforcement. Again, it's a perfectly legitimate political discussion.” Paul Mecurio: “She wasn't impeding because they could get around.” These leftists are disgusting, sick individuals.

RedWave Press

497,036 views • 6 months ago

Elon Musk: “You’d think that if you’re going to be appointed as a judge, you have to have proven that you have an excellent knowledge of the law and that you will make your decisions according to the law. That’s what we assume should be a requirement. You’ve got to know what the law is, and then you need to make decisions in accordance with the law. Not vibes. You can’t be just vibing as a judge.”
0:58

Elon Musk: “You’d think that if you’re going to be appointed as a judge, you have to have proven that you have an excellent knowledge of the law and that you will make your decisions according to the law. That’s what we assume should be a requirement. You’ve got to know what the law is, and then you need to make decisions in accordance with the law. Not vibes. You can’t be just vibing as a judge.”

Mars University

13,096,864 views • 3 months ago

The audacity and hypocrisy of this woman are beyond belief. Hunt laments ongoing “confusion” about sex and gender - which she has done more than anyone else in the UK to create. She actually says - I’m not making this up - “It is our job to create good law.” Hunt spent her entire time as CEO of Stonewall undermining the law, creating confusion and above all training public and private sector organisations nationwide to “go beyond the law.” That meant - break the law. It meant acting as if the UK had sex self-ID. Which it has never had. But institutions and organisations from the NHS to the police followed her lead. They misrepresented and broke the law. And this monstrous individual - I’m sorry, I don’t use this word lightly - dares to say, in the House of Lords - in which her presence makes a mockery of our institutions: “It is our job to create good law.” How dare she. How dare she!
0:43

The audacity and hypocrisy of this woman are beyond belief. Hunt laments ongoing “confusion” about sex and gender - which she has done more than anyone else in the UK to create. She actually says - I’m not making this up - “It is our job to create good law.” Hunt spent her entire time as CEO of Stonewall undermining the law, creating confusion and above all training public and private sector organisations nationwide to “go beyond the law.” That meant - break the law. It meant acting as if the UK had sex self-ID. Which it has never had. But institutions and organisations from the NHS to the police followed her lead. They misrepresented and broke the law. And this monstrous individual - I’m sorry, I don’t use this word lightly - dares to say, in the House of Lords - in which her presence makes a mockery of our institutions: “It is our job to create good law.” How dare she. How dare she!

Bev Jackson

108,565 views • 1 month ago

Elon Musk: 𝕏 is simply trying to adhere to the law. If the people in a country want the laws to be different, they should make the laws different. "What we're trying to do is simply adhere to the laws in a country. If something is illegal in the United States, or if it's illegal in Europe or Brazil or wherever it might be, then we will take it down, and we'll suspend the account because we're not there to make the laws. But if speech is not illegal, then what are we doing? Now we're injecting ourselves in as a censor. And where does it stop? And who decides? Where does that path lead? I think it leads to a bad place. So, if the people in a country want the laws to be different, they should make the laws different. But otherwise, we're going to obey the law in each jurisdiction. That's it. It's not more complicated than that. We're not trying to flout the law. We're trying to adhere to the law. And if the laws change, we will change. And if the laws don't change, we won't. We're just literally trying to adhere to the law." From: The All-In Podcast, September 9, 2024
1:06

Elon Musk: 𝕏 is simply trying to adhere to the law. If the people in a country want the laws to be different, they should make the laws different. "What we're trying to do is simply adhere to the laws in a country. If something is illegal in the United States, or if it's illegal in Europe or Brazil or wherever it might be, then we will take it down, and we'll suspend the account because we're not there to make the laws. But if speech is not illegal, then what are we doing? Now we're injecting ourselves in as a censor. And where does it stop? And who decides? Where does that path lead? I think it leads to a bad place. So, if the people in a country want the laws to be different, they should make the laws different. But otherwise, we're going to obey the law in each jurisdiction. That's it. It's not more complicated than that. We're not trying to flout the law. We're trying to adhere to the law. And if the laws change, we will change. And if the laws don't change, we won't. We're just literally trying to adhere to the law." From: The All-In Podcast, September 9, 2024

ELON CLIPS

5,539,295 views • 1 year ago

For Fani Willis to KEEP HER JOB on the Trump case, or even keep her law license after GPS data clearly showed she lied is INSANE. I have never seen a clearer case of perjury. There is no rule of law if attorneys can get away with that.
3:36

For Fani Willis to KEEP HER JOB on the Trump case, or even keep her law license after GPS data clearly showed she lied is INSANE. I have never seen a clearer case of perjury. There is no rule of law if attorneys can get away with that.

Glenn Beck

277,178 views • 2 years ago

PabloReports: Is it time for a special prosecutor to be appointed to get the Epstein files out? Massie: I think Pam Bondi just needs to follow the law. We literally passed a law, and if Pam Bondi doesn’t follow it, her successor could prosecute her for that.
0:55

PabloReports: Is it time for a special prosecutor to be appointed to get the Epstein files out? Massie: I think Pam Bondi just needs to follow the law. We literally passed a law, and if Pam Bondi doesn’t follow it, her successor could prosecute her for that.

Acyn

142,224 views • 3 months ago

Reporter: The NFL commissioner says their happy with their diversity program Trump: I don’t know what their diversity program is. I know him very well. He was happy also with the flag and a lot of other things that didn’t work out to well. You know what the law is. The law is the law and it changed and it’s been backed up by The Supreme Court
0:43

Reporter: The NFL commissioner says their happy with their diversity program Trump: I don’t know what their diversity program is. I know him very well. He was happy also with the flag and a lot of other things that didn’t work out to well. You know what the law is. The law is the law and it changed and it’s been backed up by The Supreme Court

Acyn

2,369,196 views • 1 year ago

BREAKING: RI Attorney General Peter Neronha (D) says assistant AG Devon Flanagan will be SUSPENDED after she was arrested for trespassing while drunk: "She’s put me in a bad position. She’s embarrassed herself... in the end, there will be a suspension without pay here.... So she’s not going to continue, you know, to go on as if nothing happened in terms of salary and that kind of thing. So it’ll be a strong sanction here." Good start, but she needs to be suspended permanently. Her sense of entitlement and believing she’s above the law while acting as an agent of the law is completely unacceptable.
1:28

BREAKING: RI Attorney General Peter Neronha (D) says assistant AG Devon Flanagan will be SUSPENDED after she was arrested for trespassing while drunk: "She’s put me in a bad position. She’s embarrassed herself... in the end, there will be a suspension without pay here.... So she’s not going to continue, you know, to go on as if nothing happened in terms of salary and that kind of thing. So it’ll be a strong sanction here." Good start, but she needs to be suspended permanently. Her sense of entitlement and believing she’s above the law while acting as an agent of the law is completely unacceptable.

Libs of TikTok

910,572 views • 11 months ago

Krishnamoorthi: When I saw where Ghislaine Maxwell was doing her remote deposition from, it did not look like a prison. It looked like a dining room. It looked like some nice mansion. It just reminded me that she got this sweetheart deal from Trump in return for her silence, fabricating testimony, or “exonerating Donald Trump.” Then her lawyer says, well, if you were to give her clemency, then she would really tell you the whole truth. And it’s like, come on, man — this is completely backwards. In our country, you don’t get clemency, you don’t get a pardon — or you should not — unless you admit guilt, show remorse, cooperate, and try to do what law enforcement and the public want you to do to make things right. She’s done none of those things. She’s never admitted guilt. She’s never shown remorse. And now she’s saying she’s only going to cooperate if she gets clemency. So I’ve introduced a resolution saying she should never be given clemency. She should never get a pardon. She’s a monster.
1:48

Krishnamoorthi: When I saw where Ghislaine Maxwell was doing her remote deposition from, it did not look like a prison. It looked like a dining room. It looked like some nice mansion. It just reminded me that she got this sweetheart deal from Trump in return for her silence, fabricating testimony, or “exonerating Donald Trump.” Then her lawyer says, well, if you were to give her clemency, then she would really tell you the whole truth. And it’s like, come on, man — this is completely backwards. In our country, you don’t get clemency, you don’t get a pardon — or you should not — unless you admit guilt, show remorse, cooperate, and try to do what law enforcement and the public want you to do to make things right. She’s done none of those things. She’s never admitted guilt. She’s never shown remorse. And now she’s saying she’s only going to cooperate if she gets clemency. So I’ve introduced a resolution saying she should never be given clemency. She should never get a pardon. She’s a monster.

Acyn

104,772 views • 5 months ago

Campbell: We truly say no one is above the law, then no one should be deemed above the law. And instead, what we're seeing is a president who thinks he is above the law and an administration that thinks they are above the law, undermining and dismantling an agency that is critical to maintaining the sense of justice in this country
0:31

Campbell: We truly say no one is above the law, then no one should be deemed above the law. And instead, what we're seeing is a president who thinks he is above the law and an administration that thinks they are above the law, undermining and dismantling an agency that is critical to maintaining the sense of justice in this country

Acyn

29,179 views • 5 months ago

Cornyn: It's a terrible example because without any accountability for people breaking the law.. there is no deterrent effect or no accountability that teaches our young people and others that, yes, you need to follow the law and, yes, there are consequences if you don't.
0:48

Cornyn: It's a terrible example because without any accountability for people breaking the law.. there is no deterrent effect or no accountability that teaches our young people and others that, yes, you need to follow the law and, yes, there are consequences if you don't.

Acyn

449,198 views • 1 year ago

The buried lede with Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs statement on Arizona's Supreme Court abortion ruling is that she's openly admitting she will defy the ruling, suggesting her EO takes priority over the state's highest court. You don't have to like the law, you can work to change the law, but you don't get to pick and choose when you follow law...unless you're a Democrat.
0:36

The buried lede with Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs statement on Arizona's Supreme Court abortion ruling is that she's openly admitting she will defy the ruling, suggesting her EO takes priority over the state's highest court. You don't have to like the law, you can work to change the law, but you don't get to pick and choose when you follow law...unless you're a Democrat.

Charlie Kirk

559,206 views • 2 years ago

CO AG Weiser: I don’t understand Governor Polis’ action to commute the sentence of Tina Peters. She broke the law. She broke her oath of office. She undermined election equipment at a cost of millions of dollars. I prosecuted her along with the Republican district attorney because it was about the rule of law. It’s about protecting our elections. It’s about doing what’s right.
2:16

CO AG Weiser: I don’t understand Governor Polis’ action to commute the sentence of Tina Peters. She broke the law. She broke her oath of office. She undermined election equipment at a cost of millions of dollars. I prosecuted her along with the Republican district attorney because it was about the rule of law. It’s about protecting our elections. It’s about doing what’s right.

Acyn

87,941 views • 1 month ago