正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🚨 Columbia Professor Says Campuses Should Develop Students’ “Political Consciousness,” Calls Hamilton Hall Takeover “Nonviolent,” and Blames “Far Right” Collaboration Columbia professor Sarah Haley at Socialism 2026 argues that campuses are not peripheral institutions, but “concentrations of wealth” and “power” that serve as sites for developing young people’s “political...

74,985 次观看 • 15 天前 •via X (Twitter)

30 条评论

NizNellie3 的头像
NizNellie315 天前

The students barricaded workers inside of the building and fought with one of the maintenance men as he tried to leave. The hijacking of Hamilton Hall was violent as hell. Police found rope, knives, zip-ties, and Hamas propaganda after they cleared the building 24 hours later.

Thomas Lynch 的头像
Thomas Lynch15 天前

Its all word salad. Amazing that anyone is willing to pay these people a salary

RORO 2.0 的头像
RORO 2.015 天前

I am just imagining being you and having to listen to and report on all this. I am exhausted already.

ah ha 的头像
ah ha15 天前

Why the fuck do they need universities for "political experimentation" while they're legal adults with the ability to vote? What a roundabout way of telling that you're grooming young people.

FredA1776 的头像
FredA177615 天前

Sarah Haley is an Associate Professor in the Department of History at Columbia, with research interests in the history of gender and women, carceral history, Black feminist history and theory, prison abolition, and feminist archival methods. Waste of air.

Slammy J 的头像
Slammy J15 天前

Anyone that says, “right?!“ after every third word they say doesn’t even believe the shit coming out of their own mouth.

Michael Petralia 的头像
Michael Petralia15 天前

And parents pay $100G for the privilege of listening to this crap. #EmbarrassedAlumnus

JC in NJ (Slava Ukraini) 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇮🇱 的头像
JC in NJ (Slava Ukraini) 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇮🇱15 天前

Non-violent against you. Telling Jews what they can and cant do? Which beliefs are acceptable. Turning colleges into a one topic of speech zones? This hyper narrow focus described as speech?

JBittyMo 的头像
JBittyMo15 天前

This one makes the commies and nazis both angry! 😂

Danit 🟦🟧 🇮🇱 💙✡️ 的头像
Danit 🟦🟧 🇮🇱 💙✡️15 天前

Well, I start to feel that closing those allged humanities departments in the academy, is the right thing to do. Their disconnection from the society/reality starts to sound as a tremendous annoying discord.

Benjamin W. Slivka 的头像
Benjamin W. Slivka14 天前

@christopherrufo wrote an entire book about the "long march through the institutions" begun in the 1960s on American college campuses:

Kristin B 🐯🧡🖤❤️🏈⚾️ 的头像
Kristin B 🐯🧡🖤❤️🏈⚾️15 天前

Stop spouting narratives

Crewd Awakening 的头像
Crewd Awakening15 天前

Arrest her for subversion

Gregory Ontherock🤙🎣🚣 的头像
Gregory Ontherock🤙🎣🚣15 天前

Defund the colleges; they are nothing more than indoctrination camps. That also put you into debt for life.

Tinsley 的头像
Tinsley15 天前

The spaces these people belong in are padded rooms.

coconutcupcakes 的头像
coconutcupcakes14 天前

No. Just NO. And, go get a real job.

Give Peace A Chance 的头像
Give Peace A Chance14 天前

"She says college has traditionally given students space for “political experimentation” before they enter the 9-to-5 workforce" No one at my university was interested in holding protests and occupying buildings.

Brian King 的头像
Brian King15 天前

Lies. Ayn Rand summed up this bag of mashed potatoes very well

Goldens Rule 的头像
Goldens Rule13 天前

No.

Simi 的头像
Simi15 天前

@EDSecMcMahon … we have a problem…. A Sarah Haley communist problem at @Columbia

Hawk-I-Doc 的头像
Hawk-I-Doc14 天前

Violence is nonviolent, men are women, up is down. Communism 101

Give Peace A Chance 的头像
Give Peace A Chance14 天前

I want to say something here for the millions of hard working, law abiding students hoping to complete their degrees and join the workforce. This person doesn't speak for them.

Sherri Anderson 的头像
Sherri Anderson14 天前

Oh so it’s not for education?

Me, too 的头像
Me, too14 天前

Scary sh’t ‼️💥✌🏽🇺🇸

CeeCee Newell 的头像
CeeCee Newell14 天前

I do not want one dime of my tax dollars to go to any university.

Gail 的头像
Gail13 天前

@neetu_arnold Haley needs to go. These people are the problem. Would NEVER let my grandson go to Columbia.

jrrrrrr 的头像
jrrrrrr14 天前

Sarah is angry that too few will be paying for her classes on how to invent excuses to live on other people’s money.

N2HIFI VA 的头像
N2HIFI VA14 天前

problem is institutions such as Columbia only want to teach THEIR political POV

DUCKIE MALLORY 的头像
DUCKIE MALLORY12 天前

Leave my kids tf alone!

Steph K 的头像
Steph K14 天前

Fuck this dumb douche. They took two janitors hostage.

相关视频

The great Dr Jordan B Peterson praises my work exposing corruption in elite academia, but expresses concern, even opposition, to my work reforming New College of Florida. He's wrong. Let me explain why. First, Peterson implies that "political control" over universities is illegitimate. It is not. New College of Florida is a public university, and public universities are the creation of the state—that is, they belong to and should reflect the values of the public. In Florida, voters elect their representatives, who, in turn, charter, fund, and govern the public universities. The takeover of New College was, in this manner, an expression of the democratic will, moving the public university in line with the wishes of the public. It was always this way. When Thomas Jefferson wrote the charter for the University of Virginia, the first public university in the United States, he explicitly stated that the university should promote the virtues of the broader society and that the ultimate authority rested with the legislature. The university's leadership, he insisted, "should at all times conform to such laws as the legislature may from time to time think proper to enact for their government, and the said University should, in all things, and at all times be subject to the controul of the legislature." As Jefferson might remind Peterson, the alternative to "political control" of the universities is not enlightened self-government but bureaucratic rule. The laissez-faire attitude of legislators, who, in recent decades, ceded control of the public universities to unelected administrators and faculty departments, created the precise problem we are now trying to resolve. It is not a betrayal of classical liberal values to insist that political leaders, rather than permanent bureaucrats, govern public institutions—it is, rather, a restoration of those values. Second, Peterson is concerned that creating a "new conservative university," as he characterizes New College of Florida, could represent "an equivalent error on the more conservative side" to that made by “radical leftist universities." No: The equivalent error would be to propose that conservatives rule all of the universities, systemically exclude progressives from faculty positions, and use academia as a vehicle for political activism. We have done nothing of the sort. We have, instead, created a balanced faculty, fostered debate, and revived classical liberal principles at the state’s smallest university—not an equivalence in degree or in kind. I would interrogate Peterson's position a step further. Does he believe that the status quo of left-wing domination is somehow more legitimate than our reforms? Does he think that Florida voters, who elected Governor DeSantis in a landslide and whose taxes bankroll public universities, should be denied a public education system that represents their values? Why should they be compelled to subsidize DEI and gender studies rather than the classical liberal arts? Third, Peterson warns that the ideological should not permeate the educational. On this, I would agree, but with a twist: America’s public universities are too ideological, but insufficiently political. In other words, we should absolutely reject the status quo of activist pseudo-scholarship and cheap left-wing partisanship, but we should remember—and embrace—the fact that public universities are inherently political institutions, with a duty to promote citizenship, cultivate virtue, and pursue the public good. It is not by accident that Aristotle's theory of education appears in the final book of the Politics. Jefferson concurred. The imperative of the public university, he insisted, is to educate the young, and, in particular, the leadership class, into the political regime. He envisioned America’s universities as a place "[t]o form the statesmen, legislators, and judges on whom public prosperity and individual happiness are so much to depend." And he saw clearly that this would require strong leadership, able to maintain the republican character and transmit political knowledge from one generation to the next. This brings me to my final point: prudence. Peterson is intimately familiar with the crisis of the academy. Yet, he hesitates to embrace even the most modest reform. He apparently prefers the posture of the critic and, as a result and perhaps inadvertently, defends the status quo. This is regrettable. The prudent line of action, consistent with the principles of classical liberalism—not to be mistaken for non-interventionism—is to support reforms that restore public trust, rebalance the faculty, and reorient the universities toward truth, rather than power. Read the full essay at City Journal:

Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️

587,901 次观看 • 2 年前