Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Comments by the actively drunk. Or people who continue to confuse Vanilla Skyrim with their 20820 mods save file. From as far back as Daggerfall, all Elder Scrolls combat is "slap things a bunch and step in and out" That's not the argument, the argument is that Morrowind was...

ArmedJ0y's profile picture

✳️Ⓐ Armed Joy 🔫💣

22,917 subscribers

155,263 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

OyunKomedi
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

When people who see themselves as the most righteous Nigerians don’t know when not to cross the lines. There is no emotions in law. Even if you fault the reason or the process, until it is successfully challenged and vacated, it remains law and must be obeyed by all or else you run foul of it and have the consequences staring you in the face. At first, I wanted to take this as activism taken too far, but no it is not. This is purely a mental health issue. Madness is not until you run naked in the streets.
1:07

When people who see themselves as the most righteous Nigerians don’t know when not to cross the lines. There is no emotions in law. Even if you fault the reason or the process, until it is successfully challenged and vacated, it remains law and must be obeyed by all or else you run foul of it and have the consequences staring you in the face. At first, I wanted to take this as activism taken too far, but no it is not. This is purely a mental health issue. Madness is not until you run naked in the streets.

Abubakar Sidiq Usman

75,678 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Arteta: “To be fair, it's a bit different when you finish second and when you win it with your phone, and that's a sport and it's a big lesson in life as well because the margins are so small and it can go either way. “When you just accomplish it, you realise, yeah, how immense it is, how big it is for so many people. I mean, just to witness the happiness and the enjoyment, all the things that I've seen from all of our supporters, families in different countries, it's just so good.”
0:45

Arteta: “To be fair, it's a bit different when you finish second and when you win it with your phone, and that's a sport and it's a big lesson in life as well because the margins are so small and it can go either way. “When you just accomplish it, you realise, yeah, how immense it is, how big it is for so many people. I mean, just to witness the happiness and the enjoyment, all the things that I've seen from all of our supporters, families in different countries, it's just so good.”

Connor Humm

39,215 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”
3:10

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”

naenia ¹ ⁶³

29,833 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered | Official Details ▫️ Rebuilt from the ground up in UE5 on top of Oblivion engine ▫️ Updated leveling system with some elements from Skyrim ▫️ Sprint added. Updated movement system. ▫️ New UI ▫️ Updated audio ▫️ Updated combat animations and gore ▫️ Recorded new lines of dialogue - each race now sounds unique ▫️ Includes all DLC expansions ▫️ Out now on PS5, PC, Xbox, and Xbox Game Pass This is basically a remake! #TheElderScrolls #Oblivion #OblivionRemastered
0:54

The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered | Official Details ▫️ Rebuilt from the ground up in UE5 on top of Oblivion engine ▫️ Updated leveling system with some elements from Skyrim ▫️ Sprint added. Updated movement system. ▫️ New UI ▫️ Updated audio ▫️ Updated combat animations and gore ▫️ Recorded new lines of dialogue - each race now sounds unique ▫️ Includes all DLC expansions ▫️ Out now on PS5, PC, Xbox, and Xbox Game Pass This is basically a remake! #TheElderScrolls #Oblivion #OblivionRemastered

KAMI

109,835 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

I asked Richardquest if he sees a pattern in Trump’s seemingly market-timed statements on the Iran war: “Jim, from where I come from, in northern England, we have a saying, let's call a spade a bloody shovel. And and you just got to call it as it as it appears. And here there is no doubt that when the heat gets really hard in the market, something happens. The president says something, he acts. There is a movement that takes the heat out and the market rallies back up again, but nothing fundamentally alters underneath it. And that's the important thing to bear in mind. And in fact, arguably the underlying movement is deteriorating and worsening. All that's happening is the market is being is being teased, if you will. It's being sugarcoated, manipulated with a small M it's being told things it wants to hear. And as a result, it goes back up again. You can't necessarily say that. And I wouldn't say that's the president's motive because I don't know. But I can say that the relationship, as you say, between these statements, market movements, reality of what's happening, true change in the economic circumstances, which as the oecd points out, is deteriorating, that there is a connection.”
1:42

I asked Richardquest if he sees a pattern in Trump’s seemingly market-timed statements on the Iran war: “Jim, from where I come from, in northern England, we have a saying, let's call a spade a bloody shovel. And and you just got to call it as it as it appears. And here there is no doubt that when the heat gets really hard in the market, something happens. The president says something, he acts. There is a movement that takes the heat out and the market rallies back up again, but nothing fundamentally alters underneath it. And that's the important thing to bear in mind. And in fact, arguably the underlying movement is deteriorating and worsening. All that's happening is the market is being is being teased, if you will. It's being sugarcoated, manipulated with a small M it's being told things it wants to hear. And as a result, it goes back up again. You can't necessarily say that. And I wouldn't say that's the president's motive because I don't know. But I can say that the relationship, as you say, between these statements, market movements, reality of what's happening, true change in the economic circumstances, which as the oecd points out, is deteriorating, that there is a connection.”

Jim Sciutto

231,192 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Tulip King explains why Bitcoin is destined to hit $1,000,000 “It's actually so deeply important to the species that we have a fair and equitable money that is as hard and resistant and true as possible” “That doesn't ever change the rules. So we're all playing the same game no matter where you are in the world, no matter who you are” “You still have to believe that it's actually so deeply important for society and humanity and it's going to make the world so much of a better place” “How could it not go to $1M and then $10M and then $100M and eventually pick your line where one BTC equals one BTC” “As bearish as I am and as much as I didn't want to sit through this price action because I'm having just a trading hot streak, it's destiny” “It's going to go to $1,000,000 because it is actually just still better than everything else ever invented” “Thank God for Satoshi”
1:05

Tulip King explains why Bitcoin is destined to hit $1,000,000 “It's actually so deeply important to the species that we have a fair and equitable money that is as hard and resistant and true as possible” “That doesn't ever change the rules. So we're all playing the same game no matter where you are in the world, no matter who you are” “You still have to believe that it's actually so deeply important for society and humanity and it's going to make the world so much of a better place” “How could it not go to $1M and then $10M and then $100M and eventually pick your line where one BTC equals one BTC” “As bearish as I am and as much as I didn't want to sit through this price action because I'm having just a trading hot streak, it's destiny” “It's going to go to $1,000,000 because it is actually just still better than everything else ever invented” “Thank God for Satoshi”

Jack

25,065 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨 A LIVING LEGEND IS COMING TO ORLANDO. 🚨 We're breaking our marketing calendar plan (don't tell anyone) because TODAY is the birthday of iconic voice actor Wes Johnson! He's joining us for #GCX2026! He has voiced some of the most iconic characters in Fallout, #TheElderScrolls and The Elder Scrolls Online as well as Starfield. He's also been the announcer of the Washington Capitals for over 25 years. 3 Fallout games: Fallout 3, Fallout 4 and Fallout 76 6 Elder Scrolls games: Morrowind, Oblivion, Skyrim, The Elder Scrolls Online, Legends and Blades. He will be doing autographs and signings at the FalloutForHope booth and the Adventurers Guild of Giving 🔜 GCX booth. Come meet him this July at Universal Orlando Resort. 🎟️ Grab your tickets now 👇
0:58

🚨 A LIVING LEGEND IS COMING TO ORLANDO. 🚨 We're breaking our marketing calendar plan (don't tell anyone) because TODAY is the birthday of iconic voice actor Wes Johnson! He's joining us for #GCX2026! He has voiced some of the most iconic characters in Fallout, #TheElderScrolls and The Elder Scrolls Online as well as Starfield. He's also been the announcer of the Washington Capitals for over 25 years. 3 Fallout games: Fallout 3, Fallout 4 and Fallout 76 6 Elder Scrolls games: Morrowind, Oblivion, Skyrim, The Elder Scrolls Online, Legends and Blades. He will be doing autographs and signings at the FalloutForHope booth and the Adventurers Guild of Giving 🔜 GCX booth. Come meet him this July at Universal Orlando Resort. 🎟️ Grab your tickets now 👇

GCX

13,084 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Nikola Jokic shares the journey it takes to become a champion. "If you wanna be successful, you need a couple years. You need to be bad, then you need to be good, and then when you're good, you need to fail. And then when you fail, you gonna figure it out." That's the process. Bad → Good → Fail → Figure it out. There are no shortcuts. "Experience is not what happens to you. It's what you're gonna do with what happened to you." Because the setbacks don't define you. Your response does. "There is a process that you need to go through. There are steps that you need to fill. There is no shortcuts. It's a journey." "And I'm glad that I'm part of this journey." The path to greatness isn't clean. It's messy, painful, and full of failures. But that is the way. Trust the journey. (🎥 NBA)
0:44

Nikola Jokic shares the journey it takes to become a champion. "If you wanna be successful, you need a couple years. You need to be bad, then you need to be good, and then when you're good, you need to fail. And then when you fail, you gonna figure it out." That's the process. Bad → Good → Fail → Figure it out. There are no shortcuts. "Experience is not what happens to you. It's what you're gonna do with what happened to you." Because the setbacks don't define you. Your response does. "There is a process that you need to go through. There are steps that you need to fill. There is no shortcuts. It's a journey." "And I'm glad that I'm part of this journey." The path to greatness isn't clean. It's messy, painful, and full of failures. But that is the way. Trust the journey. (🎥 NBA)

Coach AJ 🎯 Mental Fitness

58,708 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

CHAMATH: LET ELON DO HIS JOB, WE WILL BE BETTER OFF AS A SPECIES “At the end of the day, whether you like his style or not, his substance is irrefutable. Maybe he may mistweet from time to time, my point is, who cares? Your job as a smart investor is to separate the facts and the news from the fiction and the noise, and all of that stuff doesn't matter. It does not change the fact that tens of thousands of consumers are buying that car faster than they can get their hands on it. It doesn't change that the minute you sit inside that car, your definition of what is expected is altered forever. And you wonder why every other car around you that you ever step in that you may buy doesn't have the same things that that car offers. If you take a five year step-back and say, what did he promise in 2014 to what he's doing in 2019, you'd be ecstatic. Similarly, if you take a step back and say, from 2019 to 2024, let the man do his job, will we be better or worse off as a planet, as a species, as humanity, as consumers? We will be better off.” Source: Chamath Palihapitiya on CNBC, May 2019
1:03

CHAMATH: LET ELON DO HIS JOB, WE WILL BE BETTER OFF AS A SPECIES “At the end of the day, whether you like his style or not, his substance is irrefutable. Maybe he may mistweet from time to time, my point is, who cares? Your job as a smart investor is to separate the facts and the news from the fiction and the noise, and all of that stuff doesn't matter. It does not change the fact that tens of thousands of consumers are buying that car faster than they can get their hands on it. It doesn't change that the minute you sit inside that car, your definition of what is expected is altered forever. And you wonder why every other car around you that you ever step in that you may buy doesn't have the same things that that car offers. If you take a five year step-back and say, what did he promise in 2014 to what he's doing in 2019, you'd be ecstatic. Similarly, if you take a step back and say, from 2019 to 2024, let the man do his job, will we be better or worse off as a planet, as a species, as humanity, as consumers? We will be better off.” Source: Chamath Palihapitiya on CNBC, May 2019

Mario Nawfal

324,545 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Rick Rubin describes how the same creative aesthetic is present in everything he does: “You're at Shangri-La and you walk through the space and you see it doesn't feel like other places you've been. It has the same aesthetic as the records I make, or the things that I work on, or things that I buy.” “It’s the same aesthetic. It’s all fitting into a [creative] worldview.” ——— And then Rick and I tied this to the same creative personality type you see in every field: David: “I've had my first podcast for a decade. And it started out just me reading biographies of people that build businesses. But over time I realized it’s the same personality type: The artist, the entrepreneur, the filmmaker, the musician. I've done podcasts on all of these kind of people and I don't see any distinction between them.” Rick: “It's the same. It’s the same. It's all the creative spirit.” “Most of what I do is not really about music. I happen to work in music but it's not about the music. Does that make sense?”
1:07

Rick Rubin describes how the same creative aesthetic is present in everything he does: “You're at Shangri-La and you walk through the space and you see it doesn't feel like other places you've been. It has the same aesthetic as the records I make, or the things that I work on, or things that I buy.” “It’s the same aesthetic. It’s all fitting into a [creative] worldview.” ——— And then Rick and I tied this to the same creative personality type you see in every field: David: “I've had my first podcast for a decade. And it started out just me reading biographies of people that build businesses. But over time I realized it’s the same personality type: The artist, the entrepreneur, the filmmaker, the musician. I've done podcasts on all of these kind of people and I don't see any distinction between them.” Rick: “It's the same. It’s the same. It's all the creative spirit.” “Most of what I do is not really about music. I happen to work in music but it's not about the music. Does that make sense?”

David Senra

15,872 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

"There is no secret, but there is just commitment. It's a commitment to the process and to the work. You have to not get afraid of tired. Once you get past that threshold, that's when greatness starts to come in."
0:47

"There is no secret, but there is just commitment. It's a commitment to the process and to the work. You have to not get afraid of tired. Once you get past that threshold, that's when greatness starts to come in."

The Winning Difference

17,725 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

Jessica: You say that's the point of socialism, you keep them passive. I could make the argument and I will make the argument that you guys have been kept passive because you didn't say anything when Donald Trump took stake in U.S. Steel, or Intel. Gutfeld: How is that the same as socialism? This happens a lot. The government gives money and loans money. Jessica: It is part ownership of an American company that is supposed to be distinct from the government if you are not being massive hypocrites but you are.
1:36

Jessica: You say that's the point of socialism, you keep them passive. I could make the argument and I will make the argument that you guys have been kept passive because you didn't say anything when Donald Trump took stake in U.S. Steel, or Intel. Gutfeld: How is that the same as socialism? This happens a lot. The government gives money and loans money. Jessica: It is part ownership of an American company that is supposed to be distinct from the government if you are not being massive hypocrites but you are.

Acyn

143,923 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce

Curtis Yarvin on how "the Left" has executed population replacement in the White Dominions as a "stalk and charge." "This is a predator... [and] they're starting to speed run...mass immigration is not 2 million people entering the US a year...[it's] 10... to 100 million a year" This clip of Yarvin (Curtis Yarvin), a political blogger and software developer (according to Wikipedia), is taken from a conversation with Peter McCormack (Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪) posted to McCormack's eponymous YouTube channel on February 23, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "You might think that people getting red-pilled in various ways is something that would really put a stop to this craziness of population replacement. Oh, no, actually it's quite very much the reverse. "Because there's something anyone who's totally lost faith in the Left, in a way, they have many complaints with the Left. But it all boils down to, you basically recognize that this is not a vegetarian thing. This is a predator, right? "And so this is a predator. And so when a predator such as a lion is hunting, there are basically two phases of the pursuit. There's the stalk and the charge. And the stalk is like, well, nobody really knows what's going on here. Like, let's take the demographic replacement in the U.S. It's from the, you know, the 1965 Immigration Act. And politicians swore up and down that this was not what it, what it was. Basically, since that act, basically it's brought like 100 million people from the third world into the US, right? "Something like that. Solid, solid numbers like that. And, but in order to sort of do that, you know, you couldn't have this giant boat lift where, you know, some gigantic version of the Empire Windrush brought 100 million people at the same time. It's more a case of like, you know, slowly, slowly, catchy, catchy fish, right? You know, where you're kind of tickling it and you're like, oh yeah, oh yeah, our friends from, you know, we're open, our hearts are welcoming, right? "You know, like all of this, like, you know, stuff that's just of course, unbelievably sinister because it's sort of trading on people's goodwill and people's good wishes. It's like this con. But the thing is, when people, when enough people see the con, and all of these systems are incentive-based, they're not based on planning, the Left is not run by some cabal. It's incentives that drive things. "What you're seeing, especially in what used to be called the white dominions, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, especially is you're seeing they're starting to speed run, they're starting to come out of their crouch and basically just be like, yeah, actually we're, I mean in the 21st century, I think they've increased the population of Canada by like 35%. Right? "And so even that is small. Even that is small. The Spanish government was just like, we're going to legalize 500,000. Oh, but that's just an estimate. That's just an estimate of how many people that plan will suck in it probably will be more like over a million. Right. "And so you know and those people are Schengen. They can go anywhere in Europe and you will see them do that and the like and and so what you could see in the US if basically the next time Democrats win the presidency people go on about like mass immigration. Like no, we've not seen mass immigration. You have no idea what mass immigration is. "Mass Immigration is not 2 million people entering the US a year. Mass immigration starts I I would call it mass until it was like 10 a year. And like mass immigration is really the 10 to 50 to 100 million a year. But that's what could spark civil war. No, no— I don't know I'm seeing it here. No because people have no balls. People have no balls—"
3:27

Curtis Yarvin on how "the Left" has executed population replacement in the White Dominions as a "stalk and charge." "This is a predator... [and] they're starting to speed run...mass immigration is not 2 million people entering the US a year...[it's] 10... to 100 million a year" This clip of Yarvin (Curtis Yarvin), a political blogger and software developer (according to Wikipedia), is taken from a conversation with Peter McCormack (Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪) posted to McCormack's eponymous YouTube channel on February 23, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "You might think that people getting red-pilled in various ways is something that would really put a stop to this craziness of population replacement. Oh, no, actually it's quite very much the reverse. "Because there's something anyone who's totally lost faith in the Left, in a way, they have many complaints with the Left. But it all boils down to, you basically recognize that this is not a vegetarian thing. This is a predator, right? "And so this is a predator. And so when a predator such as a lion is hunting, there are basically two phases of the pursuit. There's the stalk and the charge. And the stalk is like, well, nobody really knows what's going on here. Like, let's take the demographic replacement in the U.S. It's from the, you know, the 1965 Immigration Act. And politicians swore up and down that this was not what it, what it was. Basically, since that act, basically it's brought like 100 million people from the third world into the US, right? "Something like that. Solid, solid numbers like that. And, but in order to sort of do that, you know, you couldn't have this giant boat lift where, you know, some gigantic version of the Empire Windrush brought 100 million people at the same time. It's more a case of like, you know, slowly, slowly, catchy, catchy fish, right? You know, where you're kind of tickling it and you're like, oh yeah, oh yeah, our friends from, you know, we're open, our hearts are welcoming, right? "You know, like all of this, like, you know, stuff that's just of course, unbelievably sinister because it's sort of trading on people's goodwill and people's good wishes. It's like this con. But the thing is, when people, when enough people see the con, and all of these systems are incentive-based, they're not based on planning, the Left is not run by some cabal. It's incentives that drive things. "What you're seeing, especially in what used to be called the white dominions, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, especially is you're seeing they're starting to speed run, they're starting to come out of their crouch and basically just be like, yeah, actually we're, I mean in the 21st century, I think they've increased the population of Canada by like 35%. Right? "And so even that is small. Even that is small. The Spanish government was just like, we're going to legalize 500,000. Oh, but that's just an estimate. That's just an estimate of how many people that plan will suck in it probably will be more like over a million. Right. "And so you know and those people are Schengen. They can go anywhere in Europe and you will see them do that and the like and and so what you could see in the US if basically the next time Democrats win the presidency people go on about like mass immigration. Like no, we've not seen mass immigration. You have no idea what mass immigration is. "Mass Immigration is not 2 million people entering the US a year. Mass immigration starts I I would call it mass until it was like 10 a year. And like mass immigration is really the 10 to 50 to 100 million a year. But that's what could spark civil war. No, no— I don't know I'm seeing it here. No because people have no balls. People have no balls—"

Sense Receptor

245,834 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

It's hard to meet a rich trader. We all know one who did well for a period, or the lucky one who caught a great run and rode it. But sitting across the table from someone who's been trading for decades and built wealth? That’s a rare breed. The best-performing brokerage accounts belong to dead people… And that's not because they had better strategies. It's because they didn't sell. That's the whole game right there. You can be as dumb as anyone alive and make money in this asset class, as long as you understand where you are in the cycle, know what to do, and don't panic when things get ugly. Trying to trade your way to wealth is the surest way to give it back. Holding it is the hard part, but it's the only part that pays.
1:03

It's hard to meet a rich trader. We all know one who did well for a period, or the lucky one who caught a great run and rode it. But sitting across the table from someone who's been trading for decades and built wealth? That’s a rare breed. The best-performing brokerage accounts belong to dead people… And that's not because they had better strategies. It's because they didn't sell. That's the whole game right there. You can be as dumb as anyone alive and make money in this asset class, as long as you understand where you are in the cycle, know what to do, and don't panic when things get ugly. Trying to trade your way to wealth is the surest way to give it back. Holding it is the hard part, but it's the only part that pays.

Raoul Pal

207,602 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

Dear Mormons, If you are a Saint today, you descend from the pioneers, by blood or by the grafting that makes you no less their child, and that means there is iron in your bones whether you have learned to feel it yet or not. You come from people who buried their children in the snow and kept walking, who were driven from state after state and did not break, who crossed a thousand miles of nothing and built a civilization out of salt and sand on the strength of pure covenant. That inheritance is not metaphor. It is in you, the same marrow, the same refusal, the same fire that no mob and no winter and no extermination order could ever put out. So let the haters on hate, let them sneer from their screens and their safe little distances, because they are screaming at a people who have outlasted far worse than them and forgotten more courage than they will ever own. You carry the essence of a covenant nation in your chest, and a people who know how to make cities rise out of a wasteland are not a people who bow. Stand up straight under what you were handed, square the shoulders this Church was built on, and remember in your bones that you were forged from the unbreakable.
4:10

Dear Mormons, If you are a Saint today, you descend from the pioneers, by blood or by the grafting that makes you no less their child, and that means there is iron in your bones whether you have learned to feel it yet or not. You come from people who buried their children in the snow and kept walking, who were driven from state after state and did not break, who crossed a thousand miles of nothing and built a civilization out of salt and sand on the strength of pure covenant. That inheritance is not metaphor. It is in you, the same marrow, the same refusal, the same fire that no mob and no winter and no extermination order could ever put out. So let the haters on hate, let them sneer from their screens and their safe little distances, because they are screaming at a people who have outlasted far worse than them and forgotten more courage than they will ever own. You carry the essence of a covenant nation in your chest, and a people who know how to make cities rise out of a wasteland are not a people who bow. Stand up straight under what you were handed, square the shoulders this Church was built on, and remember in your bones that you were forged from the unbreakable.

Kirk Rollins

119,738 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Young Americans are done with the Democrat Party “This Charlie Kirk thing kind of put the nail in the coffin of me being a Democrat” “When it comes to the death of somebody it's like It doesn't matter who they are, it doesn't matter what they think. Nobody deserves that — Your humanity is now lost. Politics is making some of them crazy and that's why I was just like, oh, y'all are drinking Kool-Aid right now and I'm not gonna drink that. I'm gonna just walk off. That's one of the reasons why and it's the nail in the coffin because if you are so politicized out that you cannot cry with somebody unalive.” “You're not as moral as you think you are. Sorry.”
2:42

Young Americans are done with the Democrat Party “This Charlie Kirk thing kind of put the nail in the coffin of me being a Democrat” “When it comes to the death of somebody it's like It doesn't matter who they are, it doesn't matter what they think. Nobody deserves that — Your humanity is now lost. Politics is making some of them crazy and that's why I was just like, oh, y'all are drinking Kool-Aid right now and I'm not gonna drink that. I'm gonna just walk off. That's one of the reasons why and it's the nail in the coffin because if you are so politicized out that you cannot cry with somebody unalive.” “You're not as moral as you think you are. Sorry.”

Wall Street Apes

77,754 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

James Harden on if the Clippers loss against the Wolves is deflating: “It's not just this game. It’s the Milwaukee game in Milwaukee. You look at the Laker game, like this [game]. I could point to a handful of games. It's not about another team. It's about us and that's what we preach and that's what it is. No matter who we play. And if we're healthy and our energy is right, it doesn't matter who we play.”
0:25

James Harden on if the Clippers loss against the Wolves is deflating: “It's not just this game. It’s the Milwaukee game in Milwaukee. You look at the Laker game, like this [game]. I could point to a handful of games. It's not about another team. It's about us and that's what we preach and that's what it is. No matter who we play. And if we're healthy and our energy is right, it doesn't matter who we play.”

Tomer Azarly

16,663 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

A woman just received her very first paycheck as a doctor and posted it online - and the comments are all over the place. What people do not realize is that a first year resident physician’s salary is actually one of the most humbling paychecks in professional America. You just spent 8 years in school, hundreds of thousands in student loans, and your first check as a doctor can run anywhere from $55,000 to $70,000 a year before taxes. But here is what the doubters are missing - that check does not stay there. Give it 5 to 10 years and that same doctor is pulling $300,000 to $500,000 or more depending on their specialty. The process is the process and every expert was once a beginner. She earned that check and every one after it is going to be bigger than the last.
1:23

A woman just received her very first paycheck as a doctor and posted it online - and the comments are all over the place. What people do not realize is that a first year resident physician’s salary is actually one of the most humbling paychecks in professional America. You just spent 8 years in school, hundreds of thousands in student loans, and your first check as a doctor can run anywhere from $55,000 to $70,000 a year before taxes. But here is what the doubters are missing - that check does not stay there. Give it 5 to 10 years and that same doctor is pulling $300,000 to $500,000 or more depending on their specialty. The process is the process and every expert was once a beginner. She earned that check and every one after it is going to be bigger than the last.

Tony Lane 🇺🇸

2,114,057 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce

Here's a clip from the Dave Smith - Douglas Murray debate on Joe Rogan that illustrates my point about Dave ducking and weaving. Dave makes an argument asserting, among other things, that "there's just no way to get rid of Hamas, without it being replaced by more Hamas or a Hamas-like group...it's General McChrystal's insurgent math" - that because innocents inevitably die in the conflict, more terrorists will replace those you manage to kill. Murray responds by noting the obvious: that Dave's logic means there is never a way to successfully fight terrorist groups, which means you just have to sit back and take it. Dave says that's not his argument, and responds: "The argument that I'm making is that when you slaughter innocent people, those people around them will tend to hate your guts." Murray characterized Dave's argument quite fairly, and his response was rock solid. Instead of answering Murray's point, Dave just disclaimed his original argument, and shifted into a new, anodyne argument about civilians hating the military force attacking them. I don't think this is intentional dishonestly or anything, but it exemplifies what I noticed when debating Scott Horton as well - a deep reluctance to be pinned down on any argument.
3:02

Here's a clip from the Dave Smith - Douglas Murray debate on Joe Rogan that illustrates my point about Dave ducking and weaving. Dave makes an argument asserting, among other things, that "there's just no way to get rid of Hamas, without it being replaced by more Hamas or a Hamas-like group...it's General McChrystal's insurgent math" - that because innocents inevitably die in the conflict, more terrorists will replace those you manage to kill. Murray responds by noting the obvious: that Dave's logic means there is never a way to successfully fight terrorist groups, which means you just have to sit back and take it. Dave says that's not his argument, and responds: "The argument that I'm making is that when you slaughter innocent people, those people around them will tend to hate your guts." Murray characterized Dave's argument quite fairly, and his response was rock solid. Instead of answering Murray's point, Dave just disclaimed his original argument, and shifted into a new, anodyne argument about civilians hating the military force attacking them. I don't think this is intentional dishonestly or anything, but it exemplifies what I noticed when debating Scott Horton as well - a deep reluctance to be pinned down on any argument.

Will Chamberlain

730,988 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce